DOCSLIB.ORG

Arkansas Aviation Operation Plan Glossary of Terms A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Arkansas Aviation Operations –March 2014 Glossary of Terms Glossary v1.r1 Arkansas Aviation Operation Plan Glossary of Terms A ABORT To terminate a preplanned aircraft maneuver; e.g. an aborted takeoff 29 ADVISORY FREQUENCY The appropriate frequency to be used for Airport Advisory Service 29 AIR CARRIER A person who undertakes directly by lease, or other arrangement, to engage in air transportation.30 AIRCRAFT CATERGORY The term “category,” as used with respect to the certification of aircraft, means a grouping of aircraft based on their intended use or operating limitations, for example, normal, utility, acrobatic, or primary. For purposes of this order, gliders and balloons will be referred to as categories rather than classifications.30 AIR TRAFFIC Aircraft operating in the air or on an airport surface, exclusive of loading ramps and parking areas 29 AIR TRAFFIC CLEARANCE An authorization by air traffic control for the purpose of preventing collision between known aircraft, for an aircraft to proceed under specified traffic conditions within controlled airspace. The pilot-in-command of an aircraft may not deviate from the provisions of a visual flight rules (VFR) or instrument flight rules (IFR) air traffic clearance except in an emergency or unless an amended clearance has been obtained 29 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL A service operated by appropriate authority to promote the safe, orderly and expeditious flow of air traffic 29 AIRPORT MARKING AID Markings used on runway and taxiway surfaces to identify a specific runway, a runway threshold, a centerline, a hold line, etc. A runway should be marked in accordance with its present usage such as: a. Visual. b. Non-precision instrument. c. Precision instrument 29 Page 1 Arkansas Department of Emergency Management Arkansas Aviation Operations –March 2014 Glossary of Terms Glossary v1.r1 AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT (ARP) Approximate geometric center of all usable runway surfaces 29 AIRSPACE CONFLICT Predicted conflict of an aircraft and active Special Activity Airspace (SAA) 29 AERONAUTICAL BEACON A visual NAVAID displaying flashes of white and/or colored light to indicate the location of an airport, a heliport, a landmark, a certain point of a Federal airway in mountainous terrain, or an obstruction 29 AERONAUTICAL CHART A map used in air navigation containing all or part of the topographic features, hazards and obstructions, navigation aids, navigation routes, designated airspace, and airports 29 AERO-MEDICAL EVACUATION (AE) Movement of patients under medical supervision to and between medical treatment facilities by air transportation1 AIR COORDINATION GROUP Establishes policies and provides for coordinating state, federal and volunteer organizations’ air response to disasters or emergencies 31 AIR GROUP COORDINATOR The ADA Assistant Director will assume the role of the Air Group Coordinator 31 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE A service provided for the purpose of the following: a. preventing collisions: (1) between aircraft and (2) on the maneuvering area between aircraft and obstructions; and b. expediting and maintaining an orderly flow of air traffic.2 APRON Defined area, on a land aerodrome, intended to accommodate aircraft for purposes of loading or unloading passengers, mail or cargo, refueling, parking or maintenance 29 ATC ASSIGNED AIR SPACE Air space of defined vertical/lateral limits, assigned by ATC, for the purpose of providing air traffic segregation between the specified activities being conducted within the assigned airspace and other IFR air traffic 29 1 Joint Publication 1-02, Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and AsSEOCiated Terms, October 17, 2008 2 Federal Aviation Administration, Pilot/Controller Glossary, March 12, 2009 Page 2 Arkansas Department of Emergency Management Arkansas Aviation Operations –March 2014 Glossary of Terms Glossary v1.r1 ATC SECURITY TRACKING Continuous tracking of aircraft movement by an ATC facility in support of the DHS, the DOD, or other security elements for national security using radar (i.e., radar tracking) or other means (e.g., manual tracking) without providing basic radar services (including traffic advisories) or other ATC services not defined in this section 29 ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICS (ADA) The ADA, is integral part of Emergency Support Function #1 – Transportation Annex (ESF #1) to the State of Arkansas Emergency Operations Plan (AR EOP), and acts as the State Aviation Director and is the Air Coordinator for the ACG. The AHTD is the lead agency for (ESF #1) Transportation in the Arkansas Emergency Operations Plan. AHTD may assume control of intact surface transportation routes and facilitate restoration of surface roads serving airports 31 Arkansas Airport Operators Association (AAOA) Represents the owners, operators, and users of the 90 public use airports located throughout the State of Arkansas31 Auto-Gas Fuel used for ground transportation B BASE LEG A flight path at right angles to the landing runway off its approach end. The base leg normally extends from the downwind leg to the intersection of the extended runway centerline30 BELOW MINIMUMS Weather conditions below the minimums prescribed by regulation for the particular action involved; e.g., landing minimums, takeoff minimums 30 C CEILING Heights above the earth’s surface of the lowest layer of clouds or obscuring phenomena that is reported as “broken,” “overcast,” or “obscuration,” and not classified as “thin” or “partial.” 29 CONTINGENCY RESPONSE AIR SUPPORT SCHEDULE Is a visibility document of all participating aircraft operating in airspace control area, to include both Joint Forces Commander (JFC) and non-JFC assets. Page 3 Arkansas Department of Emergency Management Arkansas Aviation Operations –March 2014 Glossary of Terms Glossary v1.r1 CREW MEMBER A person assigned to perform duty in an aircraft during flight time.3 COMMAND AND CONTROL (C2) The exercise of authority and direction by a properly designated commander over assigned and attached forces in the accomplishment of the mission. Command and control functions are performed through an arrangement of personnel, equipment, communications, facilities, and procedures employed by a commander in planning, directing, coordinating, and controlling forces and operations in the accomplishment of the mission.3 COMPANY AIRCRAFT An aircraft owned by a corporation, a private business, a non- profit organization, or union that is not engaged in public commercial aviation purposes or for hire to the general public 29 CONTROLLED AIR SPACE Air space of defined dimensions within which ATC service is provided to IFR flights and to VFR flights in accordance with the airspace classification. It is also the airspace within which all aircraft operators are subject to certain pilot qualifications, operating rules, and equipment requirements in 14 CFR part 91 (for specific operating requirements, please refer to 14 CFR part 91). For IFR operations in any class of controlled airspace, a pilot must file an IFR flight plan and receive an appropriate ATC clearance. Each Class B, Class C, and Class D airspace area designated for an airport contains at least one primary airport around which the airspace is designated (for specific designations and descriptions of the airspace classes, please refer to 14 CFR part 71). 29 COORDINATE To systematically advance an analysis and exchange of information among principals who have or may have a need to know certain information to carry out specific incident management responsibilities. 29 CROSSWIND When used concerning wind conditions, the word means a wind not parallel to the runway or the path of an aircraft 29 CROSSWIND LEG A flight path at right angles to the landing runway off its upwind end 29 D DEAD RECKONING Dead reckoning, as applied to flying, is the navigation of an airplane solely by means of computations based on airspeed, course, heading, wind direction, and speed, groundspeed, and elapsed time 29 3 Joint Publication 1, Joint Doctrine for the Armed Forces of the United States, March 20, 2009 Page 4 Arkansas Department of Emergency Management Arkansas Aviation Operations –March 2014 Glossary of Terms Glossary v1.r1 DEFENSE COORDINATING OFFICER (DCO) Individual who serves as the Department of Defense’s (DOD’s) single point of contact at the Joint Field Office (JFO) for requesting assistance from DOD, With few exceptions, requests for Defense Support of Civil Authorities originating at the JFO are coordinated with and processed through the DCO. The DCO may have a Defense Coordinating Element (DCE) consisting of a staff and military liaison officers to facilitate coordination and support to activated Emergency Support Functions. 29 DEFENSE SUPPORT OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES (DSCA) Support provided by U.S. military forces (Regular, Reserve, and National Guard), DOD civilians, DOD contract personnel, and DOD agency and component assets in response to requests for assistance from civilian federal, state, local, and tribal authorities for domestic emergencies, designated law enforcement support, and other domestic activities. 29 DISPLACED THRESHOLD A threshold that is located at a point on the runway other than the designated beginning of the runway 29 DOWNWIND LEG Flight path parallel to the landing runway in the direction opposite to landing, the downwind leg normally extends between the crosswind leg and the base leg 29 DYNAMIC RESTRICTIONS Those restrictions imposed by the local facility on an “as needed” basis to manage unpredictable fluctuations in traffic demands 29 E
Recommended publications
  • Guidance for the Implementation of Fdm Precursors

    Guidance for the Implementation of Fdm Precursors

    EUROPEAN OPERATORS FLIGHT DATA MONITORING WORKING GROUP B SAFETY PROMOTION Good Practice document GUIDANCE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FDM PRECURSORS June 2019 Rev 02 Guidance for the Implementation of FDM Precursors | Rev 02 Contents Table of Revisions .............................................................................................................................5 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................6 Occurrence Reporting and FDM interaction ............................................................................................ 6 Precursor Description ................................................................................................................................ 6 Methodology for Flight Data Monitoring ................................................................................................. 9 Runway Excursions (RE) ..................................................................................................................11 RE01 – Incorrect Performance Calculation ............................................................................................. 12 RE02 – Inappropriate Aircraft Configuration .......................................................................................... 14 RE03 – Monitor CG Position .................................................................................................................... 16 RE04 – Reduced Elevator Authority .......................................................................................................
  • Airfield Driver Training Program

    Airfield Driver Training Program

    Airfield Driver Training Program *This handbook is provided by the Erie Regional Airport Authority to acquaint all employees with the local procedures for operating vehicles on the airport. These rules and regulations are subject to change should circumstances dictate a need to revisit these procedures. It is the responsibility of airport management to disseminate pertinent changes and additions to this handbook. It is the responsibility of the tenant, employee, or contractor to ensure that all employees are properly trained in the policies and procedures for the operation of ground vehicles at the Erie International Airport. 1 ERI movement area drivers training 08162019 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................3 DRIVERS TRAINING ..................................................................................................................................................4 NON-COMPLIANCE....................................................................................................................................................5 DEFINITIONS ..............................................................................................................................................................7 REGULATIONS .........................................................................................................................................................11 THE AIRPORT OPERATING AREA
  • United Nations Aviation Standards for Peacekeeping and Humanitarian Air Transport Operations

    United Nations Aviation Standards for Peacekeeping and Humanitarian Air Transport Operations

    UNITED NATIONS AVIATION STANDARDS FOR PEACEKEEPING AND HUMANITARIAN AIR TRANSPORT OPERATIONS (SEPTEMBER 2012) UNITED NATIONS AVIATION STANDARDS FOR PEACEKEEPING AND HUMANITARIAN AIR TRANSPORT OPERATIONS Table of Contents LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1.2 Applicability 1.3 Rules of Construction 1.4 Administration and Organization SECTION 2: DEFINITIONS SECTION 3: UN ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF AIR TRANSPORT OPERATIONS 3.1 Organization Structure 3.2 Personnel Requirements 3.3 Personnel Qualification Requirements for Air Transport Management 3.4 Personnel Qualification Requirements for Aviation Safety Management 3.5 Personnel Qualification Requirements for Aviation Quality Assurance Management 3.6 UN Call Signs 3.7 Insurance SECTION 4: AIRCRAFT OPERATOR REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Participation in UN Charter Contracts 4.2 Crew Member Training, Qualifications and Experience 4.3 Operational Control Functions 4.4 Flight Time, Flight Duty Periods and Rest Periods 4.5 The Air Operator Certificate 4.6 AOC Holder’s Operations Management 4.7 AOC Holder’s Maintenance Requirements 4.8 AOC Holder’s Security Management 4.9 Other Requirements 4.10 Crew Member Duties and Responsibilities 4.11 Flight Rules 4.12 Carriage of Passengers and Cargo — — — — — — — — (i) LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES Section Page Date Amended Section Page Date Amended by by 1 I‐1 September 2012 IV‐24 November 2007 I‐2 November 2007 2 II‐1 September 2012 II‐2 November 2007 II‐3 September 2012 II‐4 September 2012 II‐5 September 2012 II‐6 November 2007 3 III‐1
  • The Pennsylvania State University

    The Pennsylvania State University

    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Aerospace Engineering REAL-TIME PATH PLANNING AND AUTONOMOUS CONTROL FOR HELICOPTER AUTOROTATION A Dissertation in Aerospace Engineering by Thanan Yomchinda 2013 Thanan Yomchinda Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2013 The dissertation of Thanan Yomchinda was reviewed and approved* by the following: Joseph F. Horn Associate Professor of Aerospace Engineering Dissertation Co-Advisor Co-Chair of Committee Jacob W. Langelaan Associate Professor of Aerospace Engineering Dissertation Co-Advisor Co-Chair of Committee Edward C. Smith Professor of Aerospace Engineering Christopher D. Rahn Professor of Mechanical Engineering George A. Lesieutre Professor of Aerospace Engineering Head of the Department of Aerospace Engineering *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT Autorotation is a descending maneuver that can be used to recover helicopters in the event of total loss of engine power; however it is an extremely difficult and complex maneuver. The objective of this work is to develop a real-time system which provides full autonomous control for autorotation landing of helicopters. The work includes the development of an autorotation path planning method and integration of the path planner with a primary flight control system. The trajectory is divided into three parts: entry, descent and flare. Three different optimization algorithms are used to generate trajectories for each of these segments. The primary flight control is designed using a linear dynamic inversion control scheme, and a path following control law is developed to track the autorotation trajectories. Details of the path planning algorithm, trajectory following control law, and autonomous autorotation system implementation are presented.
  • Cessna Model 150M Performance- Cessna Specifications Model 150M Performance - Specifications

    Cessna Model 150M Performance- Cessna Specifications Model 150M Performance - Specifications

    PILOT'S OPERATING HANDBOOK ssna 1977 150 Commuter CESSNA MODEL 150M PERFORMANCE- CESSNA SPECIFICATIONS MODEL 150M PERFORMANCE - SPECIFICATIONS SPEED: Maximum at Sea Level 109 KNOTS Cruise, 75% Power at 7000 Ft 106 KNOTS CRUISE: Recommended Lean Mixture with fuel allowance for engine start, taxi, takeoff, climb and 45 minutes reserve at 45% power. 75% Power at 7000 Ft Range 340 NM 22.5 Gallons Usable Fuel Time 3.3 HRS 75% Power at 7000 Ft Range 580 NM 35 Gallons Usable Fuel Time 5. 5 HRS Maximum Range at 10,000 Ft Range 420 NM 22. 5 Gallons Usable Fuel Time 4.9 HRS Maximum Range at 10,000 Ft Range 735 NM 35 Gallons Usable Fuel Time 8. 5 HRS RATE OF CLIMB AT SEA LEVEL 670 FPM SERVICE CEILING 14, 000 FT TAKEOFF PERFORMANCE: Ground Roll 735 FT Total Distance Over 50-Ft Obstacle 1385 FT LANDING PERFORMANCE: Ground Roll 445 FT Total Distance Over 50-Ft Obstacle 107 5 FT STALL SPEED (CAS): Flaps Up, Power Off 48 KNOTS Flaps Down, Power Off 42 KNOTS MAXIMUM WEIGHT 1600 LBS STANDARD EMPTY WEIGHT: Commuter 1111 LBS Commuter II 1129 LBS MAXIMUM USEFUL LOAD: Commuter 489 LBS Commuter II 471 LBS BAGGAGE ALLOWANCE 120 LBS WING LOADING: Pounds/Sq Ft 10.0 POWER LOADING: Pounds/HP 16.0 FUEL CAPACITY: Total Standard Tanks 26 GAL. Long; Range Tanks 38 GAL. OIL CAPACITY 6 QTS ENGINE: Teledyne Continental O-200-A 100 BHP at 2750 RPM PROPELLER: Fixed Pitch, Diameter 69 IN. D1080-13-RPC-6,000-12/77 PILOT'S OPERATING HANDBOOK Cessna 150 COMMUTER 1977 MODEL 150M Serial No.
  • (VL for Attrid

    (VL for Attrid

    ECCAIRS Aviation 1.3.0.12 Data Definition Standard English Attribute Values ECCAIRS Aviation 1.3.0.12 VL for AttrID: 391 - Event Phases Powered Fixed-wing aircraft. (Powered Fixed-wing aircraft) 10000 This section covers flight phases specifically adopted for the operation of a powered fixed-wing aircraft. Standing. (Standing) 10100 The phase of flight prior to pushback or taxi, or after arrival, at the gate, ramp, or parking area, while the aircraft is stationary. Standing : Engine(s) Not Operating. (Standing : Engine(s) Not Operating) 10101 The phase of flight, while the aircraft is standing and during which no aircraft engine is running. Standing : Engine(s) Start-up. (Standing : Engine(s) Start-up) 10102 The phase of flight, while the aircraft is parked during which the first engine is started. Standing : Engine(s) Run-up. (Standing : Engine(s) Run-up) 990899 The phase of flight after start-up, during which power is applied to engines, for a pre-flight engine performance test. Standing : Engine(s) Operating. (Standing : Engine(s) Operating) 10103 The phase of flight following engine start-up, or after post-flight arrival at the destination. Standing : Engine(s) Shut Down. (Standing : Engine(s) Shut Down) 10104 Engine shutdown is from the start of the shutdown sequence until the engine(s) cease rotation. Standing : Other. (Standing : Other) 10198 An event involving any standing phase of flight other than one of the above. Taxi. (Taxi) 10200 The phase of flight in which movement of an aircraft on the surface of an aerodrome under its own power occurs, excluding take- off and landing.
  • Airport Traffic Directives for the Operation of Vehicles

    Airport Traffic Directives for the Operation of Vehicles

    Driving of Vehicles on the Movement Area – Airport Vehicle Operator Permit (AVOP) (NAME OF THE COUNTRY, CAA LOGO ETC.) AIRPORT DIRECTIVE NO: SUBJECT: DRIVING OF VEHICLES ON THE MOVEMENT AREA - AIRPORT VEHICLE OPERATOR PERMIT (AVOP) DATE: MM/DD/YYYY ISSUED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF : (position title) ASSOCIATED ADVISORY CIRCULAR AND DIRECTIVES Nil. GENERAL Civil Aviation Authority Aerodrome Directives contain information about standards, practices and procedures that the Authority has found to be an Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) with the associated rule. An AMC is not intended to be the only means of compliance with a rule, and consideration will be given to other methods of compliance that may be presented to the Authority. When new standards, practices or procedures are found to be acceptable, they will be added to the appropriate Guidance Document. PURPOSE This Airport Directive provides methods, acceptable to the Authority, for showing compliance with the authorization to drive a vehicle on the airport movement area, (to mention the national regulations article(s)) and explanatory material to assist in showing compliance. IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS Airport Operators are requested to implement an "Airport Vehicle Operator Permit" (AVOP) system. The attached "Airport Traffic Directives for the Operation of Vehicles on Movement Areas" is a study document for airport workers having the need to drive a vehicle on the movement areas. The Airport Operator shall supplement these Date: MM/DD/YYYY (name of the country), CAA Page 1 of 133 Driving of Vehicles on the Movement Area – Airport Vehicle Operator Permit (AVOP) "national" directives with "local" airport traffic directives to be included in Chapter 10.
  • International Civil Aviation Organization Asia Pacific

    International Civil Aviation Organization Asia Pacific

    INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION ASIA PACIFIC REGIONAL GUIDANCE ON REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DESIGN AND OPERATIONS OF WATER AERODROMES FOR SEAPLANE OPERATIONS This Guidance Material is approved by the meeting and published by ICAO Asia and Pacific Office, Bangkok RECORD OF AMENDMENTS AND CORRIGENDA AMENDMENTS CORRIGENDA No. Date Date Entered No. Date Date Entered applicable entered by of issue entered by i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. iv PART I GENERAL ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Definitions ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Certification of water aerodromes .............................................................................. 2 PART II WATER AERODROME DATA ................................................................................... 3 2.1 Water aerodrome data quality requirements ............................................................ 3 2.2 Geographic data............................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Water aerodrome dimensions and related information ............................................ 4 2.4 Provision of operational information .......................................................................... 5 PART III PHYSICAL
  • Sidestick Controllers During High Gain Tasks

    Sidestick Controllers During High Gain Tasks

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2002 Sidestick Controllers During High Gain Tasks Brian J. Goszkowicz University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Systems Engineering and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Commons Recommended Citation Goszkowicz, Brian J., "Sidestick Controllers During High Gain Tasks. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2002. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2060 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Brian J. Goszkowicz entitled "Sidestick Controllers During High Gain Tasks." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aviation Systems. Dr. R. Kimberlin, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Dr. U. P. Solies, Dr. Fred Stellar Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Brian J. Goszkowicz entitled “Sidestick Controllers During High Gain Tasks.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aviation Systems.
  • On a Supersonic Cruise Research Transport to Minimize Airport

    On a Supersonic Cruise Research Transport to Minimize Airport

    NASA TP 1742 NASA Technical Paper 1742 c.1 on a Supersonic Cruise ResearchTransport To MinimizeAirport-Community Noise William D. Grantham, Paul M. Smith, a,nd Perry L. Deal NOVEMBER 1980 00b7bb0 NASA Technical Paper 1742 A SimulatorStudy for the Development and Evaluation of OperatingProcedures on a SupersonicCruise Research Transport To MinimizeAirport-Community Noise William D. Grantham Langley Research Center Hampton,Virginia Paul M. Smith KentronInternational, Inc. Hampton,Virginia Perry L. Deal t Langley Research Center Hampton,Virginia National Aeronautics and Space Administration Scientific and Technical Information Branch 1980 SUMMARY Piloted-simulator studies have been conducted to determine takeoff and landing operating procedures for a supersonic cruise research transport con- cept that result in predicted noise levels which meet current Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) noise-certification standards. The results of these studies indicate that with the ofuse standard FAA noise-certification test procedures, the simulated aircraft did not meet FAA the traded-noise-level standards during takeoff and landing. With the use of advanced test proce- dures, however, this simulated aircraft did meet the traded-noise-level stan- dards for average flightcrew skills. The advanced takeoff procedures developed involve violating threeof the current Federal Aviation Regulations(FAR) noise- test conditions. These violations are thrust cutback at altitudes below 214 m (700 ft), thrust cutbacklevel below that presently allowed, and configuration change (other than raising the landing gear). Of these rule violations, thrust cutback at altitudes below 214 (700m ft) is of primary importance. That is, only minor noise-reduction benefits were realized by violating the other rules listed. It was not necessary to violate any FAR noise-test conditions during landing approach.
  • Segmented Standard Taxi Routes—A New Way to Integrate Remotely Piloted Aircraft Into Airport Surface Traffic

    Segmented Standard Taxi Routes—A New Way to Integrate Remotely Piloted Aircraft Into Airport Surface Traffic

    aerospace Article Segmented Standard Taxi Routes—A New Way to Integrate Remotely Piloted Aircraft into Airport Surface Traffic Michael Finke and Sandro Lorenz * German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Flight Guidance, 38108 Braunschweig, Germany; michael.fi[email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 April 2020; Accepted: 9 June 2020; Published: 25 June 2020 Abstract: The safe and orderly integration of unmanned aircraft in the airspace is surely among the most difficult challenges to be solved in the near future. However, a safe and fluid traffic management on the ground is not less important and not less challenging, as completely different aspects have to be considered here. Much less work has been done yet to solve this question. In the frame of the project Surface Management Operations (SuMO), a procedural solution has been developed to enable fully integrated unmanned airport ground movements while allowing air traffic controllers to guarantee a safe, orderly and expeditious flow of traffic. This concept is based on the idea of segmented standard taxi routes for unmanned aircraft, while maintaining current procedures for manned aircraft. From 2017 to 2019, a two-stage validation campaign validated this new solution. No concerns regarding safety or human factors issues were revealed. Access and Equity, as well as Interoperability, were found to be very satisfying. A fast time simulation of mixed manned and unmanned traffic, using the proposed solution, was almost as efficient as pure manned traffic and can easily be implemented at medium-size airports. This article provides information about the experimental setup and the conduction of both validations stages, and illustrates obtained results.
  • FAA Order 8260.19I

    FAA Order 8260.19I

    ORDER 8260.19I Effective Date: National Policy 06/29/2020 SUBJ: Flight Procedures and Airspace This order provides guidance to all FAA personnel for the administration and accomplishment of the FAA Flight Procedures and Airspace Program. The development of effective and efficient flight procedures is closely related to facility establishment and airport programs. These procedures require active participation by Flight Standards, the applicable Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Service Area, and office of Airports personnel in the planning, programming, and budgeting of navigation facilities and airport development plans. Instrument procedures often determine the alignment and location of navigation facilities as well as the location, marking, and lighting of airport landing and maneuvering areas. Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 95 establishes minimum en route altitude (MEA), minimum reception altitude (MRA), maximum authorized altitude (MAA), minimum obstruction clearance altitude (MOCA), minimum crossing altitude (MCA), and changeover point (COP) are established by the Federal Aviation Administration for instrument flight along Federal airways. General information and responsibilities are contained in Chapter 1 and guidelines and procedures that are common to all instrument flight procedures are in Chapter 2. Chapter 3 and 4 contain specific guidelines and procedures for en route and terminal instrument flight procedures, respectively. Chapter 5 contains information concerning airspace - obstruction evaluation (OE); designation of controlled airspace; airport airspace analysis; restricted areas; and establishment, relocation, or discontinuance of radio navigation aids. Chapter 6 provides information concerning Military procedures. Chapter 7 contains planning standards; airway, terminal, and airport planning; safety analysis; private aid, and facilities and equipment (F&E) support.