DOCSLIB.ORG

FAA JO Order 7110.65W, Air Traffic Control

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FAA JO Order 7110.65W, Air Traffic Control ORDER JO 7110.65W Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: December 10, 2015 SUBJ: Air Traffic Control This order prescribes air traffic control procedures and phraseology for use by personnel providing air traffic control services. Controllers are required to be familiar with the provisions of this order that pertain to their operational responsibilities and to exercise their best judgment if they encounter situations not covered by it. Distribution: ZAT-710, ZAT-464 Initiated By: AJV-0 Vice President, System Operations Services RECORD OF CHANGES DIRECTIVE NO. JO 7110.65W CHANGE SUPPLEMENTS CHANGE SUPPLEMENTS TO OPTIONAL TO OPTIONAL BASIC BASIC FAA Form 1320−5 (6−80) USE PREVIOUS EDITION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION JO 7110.65W CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION CHG 1 Air Traffic Organization Policy Effective Date: 05/26/16 SUBJ: Air Traffic Control 1. Purpose of This Change. This change transmits revised pages to Federal Aviation Administration Order JO 7110.65W, Air Traffic Control, and the Briefing Guide. 2. Audience. This change applies to all Air Traffic Organization (ATO) personnel and anyone using ATO directives. 3. Where Can I Find This Change? This change is available on the FAA Web site at http://faa.gov/air_traffic/publications and https://employees.faa.gov/tools_resources/orders_notices/. 4. Explanation of Policy Change. See the Explanation of Changes attachment which has editorial corrections and changes submitted through normal procedures. The Briefing Guide lists only new or modified material, along with background. 5. Distribution. This change is distributed to selected offices in Washington headquarters, regional offices, service area offices, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, and the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center. Also, copies are sent to all air traffic field facilities and international aviation field offices; and to interested aviation public. 6. Disposition of Transmittal. Retain this transmittal until superseded by a new basic order. 7. Page Control Chart. See the page control chart attachment. Elizabeth L. Ray Vice President, Mission Support Services Air Traffic Organization Date: __________________________ Distribution: ZAT-710, ZAT-464 Initiated By: AJV-0 Vice President, Mission Support Services 5/26/16 JO 7110.65W CHG 1 Explanation of Changes Change 1 Direct questions through appropriate facility/service center office staff to the Office of Primary Interest (OPI) a. 1-1-9. REQUESTS FOR INTERPRETA- c. 1-2-6. ABBREVIATIONS TIONS OR CLARIFICATIONS This change adds the abbreviation “NOWGT” to This change adds processes for requesting the subject paragraph. interpretations or clarifications pertaining to FAA d. 2-3-6. AIRCRAFT TYPE Order JO 7110.65 content. This change deletes the contents of Appendices A, b. 1-2-6. ABBREVIATIONS B, and C, and redirects the reader to FAA Order 2-3-10. CONTROL SYMBOLOGY 7360.1, Aircraft Type Designators. 2-4-17. NUMBERS USAGE e. 2-6-2. HAZARDOUS INFLIGHT 2-5-2. NAVAID TERMS WEATHER ADVISORY SERVICE 2-5-3. NAVAID FIXES 2-9-3. CONTENT 3-3-2. CLOSED/UNSAFE RUNWAY This change reflects the migration of the En Route INFORMATION Flight Advisory Service responsibilities into the 3-7-5. PRECISION APPROACH InFlight position and the discontinued use of the CRITICAL AREA term “Flight Watch” within the CONUS and Puerto 4-1-1. ALTITUDE AND DISTANCE Rico. LIMITATIONS f. 2-6-4. WEATHER AND CHAFF 4-6-4. HOLDING INSTRUCTIONS SERVICES 4-7-5. MILITARY TURBOJET EN ROUTE DESCENT This change adds the requirement for issuing an 4-7-13. SWITCHING ILS/MLS altitude to maintain when clearing an aircraft to RUNWAYS deviate after a crossing altitude had already been 5-1-13. RADAR SERVICE issued, including Climb Via or Descend Via TERMINATION clearances on SID/STAR procedures. 5-9-2. FINAL APPROACH COURSE g. 2-10-1. EN ROUTE SECTOR TEAM INTERCEPTION POSITION RESPONSIBILITIES 5-9-4. ARRIVAL INSTRUCTIONS 5-9-5. APPROACH SEPARATION This change adds oceanic sector teams to the title RESPONSIBILITY and deletes subparagraph 2-10-1a2. It also removes 5-9-6. SIMULTANEOUS DEPENDENT the remaining subparagraph designators that are no APPROACHES longer needed. 5-9-9. SIMULTANEOUS OFFSET h. 2-10-2. TERMINAL RADAR/ INSTRUMENT APPROACHES (SOIA) – NONRADAR TEAM RESPONSIBILITIES HIGH UPDATE RADAR This change deletes subparagraph 2-10-2a2 and 5-13-1. MONITOR ON PAR removes the subparagraph 2-10-2 designators that EQUIPMENT are no longer needed. 5-13-3. MONITOR INFORMATION 13-1-8. RECORDING OF CONTROL i. 2-10-3. TOWER TEAM DATA RESPONSIBILITIES This change deletes subparagraph 2-10-3a2 and Due to lack of MLS and approach procedures in the removes the subparagraph 2-10-3a designators that NAS, this change removes all MLS references. are no longer needed. Explanation of Changes E of C−1 JO 7110.65W CHG 1 5/26/16 j. 3-3-7. FAR FIELD MONITOR (FFM) r. 4-8-1. APPROACH CLEARANCE REMOTE STATUS UNIT This change revises the associated FIG 4-8-5 to be The MM, or in the absence of a MM, 1/2 mile final consistent with the content. and the IM or CAT II Missed Approach Point s. 5-1-3. RADAR USE (MAP) will be used as reference points for the This change provides procedural guidance for issuance of the localizer reliability advisory. facilities providing ATC services using ADS-B and k. 3-8-1. SEQUENCE/SPACING WAM as surveillance sources. APPLICATION t. 5-4-3. METHODS This change advises pilots to inform ATC as soon as This change allows the use of the CID as a means for possible of any delay clearing the runway during the transferring controller to identify an aircraft in their stop-and-go or full stop landing. making an intra-facility point out. l. 3-9-6. SAME RUNWAY SEPARATION u. 5−4−6. RECEIVING CONTROLLER HANDOFF This change makes all the figures consistent with the logic provided in the text. The shaded aircraft in Changes to this paragraph were inadvertently FIG 3-9-3 is moved to be within the confines of the omitted from the global implementation of the runway, similar to the departure aircraft depicted in previously vetted FAA Order 7110.311C, into FAA FIG 3-9-1 and FIG 3-9-2. Order 7110.65. v. 5-6-2. METHODS m. 3-9-9. NONINTERSECTING CONVERGING RUNWAY OPERATIONS This change adds the requirement to issue an altitude to maintain when clearing an aircraft to This change relocates a subparagraph of 3-9-9, and deviate off of a procedure containing published renumbers the remaining subparagraphs. crossing restrictions except when the aircraft has n. 3-10-5. LANDING CLEARANCE not yet been cleared to navigate vertically. w. 5-9-10. SIMULTANEOUS This change allows controllers to be clearer with INDEPENDENT APPROACHES TO their instructions when controlling aircraft in the WIDELY-SPACED PARALLEL RUNWAYS traffic pattern while utilizing LUAW procedures. WITHOUT FINAL MONITORS These additional examples will reduce pilot confusion. This change allows controllers to discontinue using 1,000 feet vertical or 3 miles radar separation o. 4-2-5. ROUTE OR ALTITUDE between aircraft conducting an RNAV (RNP) AMENDMENTS approach that contains a radius-to-fix (RF) leg and This change conveys to ATC they cannot modify aircraft conducting a straight-in ILS/RNAV with these restrictions (speed and/or crossing altitudes) vertical guidance/GLS, or another RNAV (RNP) since they are needed to ensure obstacle avoidance. approach with an RF leg once the aircraft are established on their respective approach proced- p. 4-3-2. DEPARTURE CLEARANCES ures. This change clarifies that both textual and graphic x. 7-2-1. VISUAL SEPARATION ODPs can be assigned by ATC to ensure aircraft This change clarifies existing procedures and separation. responsibilities and revises phraseology to ensure q. 4-7-12. AIRPORT CONDITIONS understanding of ATC clearances and instructions. 4-8-1. APPROACH CLEARANCE y. 7-4-4. APPROACHES TO MULTIPLE 4-8-9. MISSED APPROACH RUNWAYS 4-8-10. APPROACH INFORMATION This change permits the use of RNAV procedures This change prescribes controller responsibility and direct courses that will intercept the extended when informed that a pilot will conduct Cold centerline of the runway at an angle not greater than Temperature Compensation (CTC). 30 degrees, to be used in lieu of radar vectors. This E of C−2 5/26/16 JO 7110.65W CHG 1 change also permits use of procedures using specific directions to facilities as to duties and radius-to-fix legs that intercept final in lieu of responsibilities. 30-degree intercept provisions otherwise contained in this paragraph. ad. 13-1-9. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AUTOMATED NOTIFICATION z. 8-7-3. LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION 8-8-3. LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION 8-9-3. LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION This change adds the requirement for the first sector 8-10-3. LONGITUDINAL SEPARATION displaying the Embedded Route Text (ERT) coding to issue and acknowledge the ERT coding unless This change implements ADS-B ITP to allow climb otherwise coordinated or specified in appropriate and descent of appropriately equipped aircraft using facility directives. reduced separation in the oceanic domain upon pilot request. ae. Appendix A - Aircraft Information Fixed-Wing Aircraft aa. 9-1-2. SPECIAL HANDLING Appendix B - Aircraft Information This change increases Air Traffic awareness that Helicopters/Rotorcrafts aircraft using the call sign FLIGHT VAL will be Appendix C - Aircraft Information performing Flight Validation activities that are Specific Amateur−Built/Experimental Aircraft similar to Flight Check activities, but no additional priority is granted. This change directs readers to a new source of ab. 10-2-13. MANPADS ALERT aircraft information and deletes Appendices A, B, This change identifies the DEN as the FAA and C. Headquarters office for MANPADS notifications, af. Entire publication adds a clarification edit, and a reference to FAA Order JO 7610.4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Multimodal Transport 28 Charting the History of Tents Are Informative and Not Regulatory Or Is a Joint Effort of Multiple Air Force One Directive
    THE MOBILITYTHE MAGAZINE OF AIR MOBILITY COMMAND | SUMMER 2017 FORUM Rota’s Multimodal Transport is a Joint Effort of Multiple Branches and Nations HURRICANES: Brig Gen Richoux Speaks from Experience Volume 26, No. 2 CONTENTS THE MOBILITY FORUM Summer 2017 AIR MOBILITY COMMAND Gen Carlton Everhart II 3 10 16 26 34 DIRECTOR OF SAFETY Col Michael R. Seiler FROM THE TOP 18 Unit Deployment Manager: Are [email protected] 3 Hurricanes: Brig Gen Richoux You Mission Ready? Speaks from Experience 34 Benchmark Cybersecurity 5 So Long, Fellow Airmen Assessment on C-5M EDITORS Kim Brumley RISK MANAGEMENT SEASONAL [email protected] 6 My Pride is All That Hurt CONSIDERATIONS Sherrie Schatz Having a Blast at Home 12 Aerial Port LOSAs Increase 22 Sheree Lewis Safety, Efficiency 30 Water: The Fickle (and [email protected] Deceptive) Element FLIGHT SAFETY Graphic Design Elizabeth Bailey 8 Aviation Ground Mishaps: MOTORCYCLE CULTURE A ‘Good Guy’ Club Four-Year Indicators 26 The Mobility Forum (TMF) is published four times a year by the Director of Safety, Air SAFETY CULTURE AMC HERITAGE Mobility Command, Scott AFB, IL. The con- 10 Rota's Multimodal Transport 28 Charting the History of tents are informative and not regulatory or is a Joint Effort of Multiple Air Force One directive. Viewpoints expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the Branches and Nations policy of AMC, USAF, or any DoD agency. 13 Critical Days of Summer 2017 Contributions: Please email articles and 14 7 Steps to Setting and REGULAR FEATURES photos to [email protected], fax to Reaching Your Safety Goal 20 Center Spread: (580) 628-2011, or mail to Schatz Publishing, 24 I Had Junk in My Trunk! The Rescue Reflex 11950 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    1995-2020 ANNUAL REPORT RESPONSIBILITY PROACTIVENESS CREATIVITY TABLE OF CONTENTS I. MESSAGE FROM CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 6 II. DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 12 Vision 12 Mission 12 Core values 12 Targets 12 Development strategy 13 III. COMPANY OVERVIEW 18 General information 18 Business lines 20 Business network 22 Establishment and Development history 24 Organization structure 26 Shareholder structure 38 Highlight events in 2019 40 Awards and Accolades in 2019 42 IV. BUSINESS PERFORMANCE 46 Key operational performance 46 Key financial indicators 49 V. ASSESSMENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 52 On the operations of Vietnam Airlines 52 On the activities of the Board of Management (BOM) 55 On the orientation of operations for 2020 56 VI. REPORT OF THE BOARD OF MANAGEMENT ON BUSINESS RESULTS IN 2019 58 Business environment 58 Performance in various areas 60 Route network 60 Fleet 66 Flight operation 67 Commercial performance 68 Services 75 Technical areas 79 Safety and security 81 Human resource management 82 Communications and brand development 86 Information technology 90 Cooperation programs 91 Investment activities 94 Financial performance 99 Innovations in organizational structure and management policy 103 VII. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES 106 Compliance with environmental protection regulations 108 Social engagement 109 Employee welfare and benefits 112 VIII. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 114 Corporate governance structure 114 Information and activities of the Board of Directors 116 Activities of the committees under the Board of Directors 116 Report of the Supervisory Board 117 Activities of the Chief Administrator & Corporate Secretary 119 Investor relations 119 IX. RISK MANAGEMENT 122 X. AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 126 To download a soft copy of Vietnam Airlines’ Annual Report 2019, please visit https://www.vietnamairlines.com/vn/about-us/investor-relations/annual-reports or scan QR code on the left-hand side.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma International Trade Bulletin
    OKLAHOMA INTERNATIONAL TRADE BULLETIN 301 N.W. 63rd Street, Suite 330 700 N. Greenwood Ave., Suite 1400 900 N. Stiles Ave. Oklahoma City, OK 73116 Tulsa, OK 74106 Oklahoma City, OK 73104 (405)608-5302 Fax: (405)608-5302 (918)581-7650 Fax: (918)581-6263 (405)815-6552 Fax: (405)815-5199 A joint newsletter of the Oklahoma Department of Commerce and the U.S. Department of Commerce Volume XXVII, Number 1 October 2009 Exporting 101: Shipping and Documentation Workshop – November 12, 2009 – Tulsa, OK The Oklahoma District Export Council, in conjunction with the Oklahoma U. S. Export Assistance Center and the Oklahoma Department of Commerce, will sponsor a full-day workshop in Tulsa, on November 12, 2009, on Exporting 101 – Export Shipping and Documentation Workshop. Registration will begin at 8:30 a.m. The workshop will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The workshop will be located at OSU- Tulsa, Room 106 of the North Hall, 700 North Greenwood Avenue, Tulsa, OK. For a fee of only $35.00 you will receive nearly seven hours of expert advice from freight forwarders and Oklahoma U. S. Export Assistance Center International Trade Specialists. The following subjects will be covered: export licensing; utilizing a freight forwarder; Incoterms; export quotations; shipping methods; export packing; export documentation; and insurance. This will be an excellent opportunity to have your questions answered by the experts. Your registration fee will also include a networking luncheon. Checks should be made payable to the Oklahoma District Export Council and mailed to 301 N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Kaimin, March 19, 2008 Students of the Niu Versity of Montana, Missoula
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Associated Students of the University of Montana Montana Kaimin, 1898-present (ASUM) 3-19-2008 Montana Kaimin, March 19, 2008 Students of The niU versity of Montana, Missoula Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/studentnewspaper Recommended Citation Students of The nivU ersity of Montana, Missoula, "Montana Kaimin, March 19, 2008" (2008). Montana Kaimin, 1898-present. 5105. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/studentnewspaper/5105 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Associated Students of the University of Montana (ASUM) at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Montana Kaimin, 1898-present by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UMʼs Independent Campus Newspaper Since 1898 Wednesday MVolume CX, Issueontana 81 Kaimin March 19, 2008 Inside the Kaimin Arts p 7 On Campus Today Forecast Sports p 5 Finals week will start with • 9-11 a.m. President’s Open Offi ce Hours, University Hall 109 High 45F UM billiards player headed • 6 p.m. ASUM Senate meeting, UC 330-331 Low 29F Wilco, get worse from there • 7 p.m. “Lunafest,” short fi lms by, for and about women, UC Theater to nationals – Courtesy of UM Events Calendar UM possible stop on Obama’s Montana trip Elizabeth Harrison Montana’s June 3 primary draws for the Obama campaign. When Democratic But Tinsley said his subsequent MONTANA KAIMIN near, the candidate might campaign he found out the senator was to party, he phone calls to the campaign in other areas of the state as well.
    [Show full text]
  • AIR POWER History / WINTER 2015 from the Editor
    WINTER 2015 - Volume 62, Number 4 WWW.AFHISTORICALFOUNDATION.ORG The Air Force Historical Foundation Founded on May 27, 1953 by Gen Carl A. “Tooey” Spaatz MEMBERSHIP BENEFITS and other air power pioneers, the Air Force Historical All members receive our exciting and informative Foundation (AFHF) is a nonprofi t tax exempt organization. Air Power History Journal, either electronically or It is dedicated to the preservation, perpetuation and on paper, covering: all aspects of aerospace history appropriate publication of the history and traditions of American aviation, with emphasis on the U.S. Air Force, its • Chronicles the great campaigns and predecessor organizations, and the men and women whose the great leaders lives and dreams were devoted to fl ight. The Foundation • Eyewitness accounts and historical articles serves all components of the United States Air Force— Active, Reserve and Air National Guard. • In depth resources to museums and activities, to keep members connected to the latest and AFHF strives to make available to the public and greatest events. today’s government planners and decision makers information that is relevant and informative about Preserve the legacy, stay connected: all aspects of air and space power. By doing so, the • Membership helps preserve the legacy of current Foundation hopes to assure the nation profi ts from past and future US air force personnel. experiences as it helps keep the U.S. Air Force the most modern and effective military force in the world. • Provides reliable and accurate accounts of historical events. The Foundation’s four primary activities include a quarterly journal Air Power History, a book program, a • Establish connections between generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Aviation Operation Plan Glossary of Terms A
    Arkansas Aviation Operations –March 2014 Glossary of Terms Glossary v1.r1 Arkansas Aviation Operation Plan Glossary of Terms A ABORT To terminate a preplanned aircraft maneuver; e.g. an aborted takeoff 29 ADVISORY FREQUENCY The appropriate frequency to be used for Airport Advisory Service 29 AIR CARRIER A person who undertakes directly by lease, or other arrangement, to engage in air transportation.30 AIRCRAFT CATERGORY The term “category,” as used with respect to the certification of aircraft, means a grouping of aircraft based on their intended use or operating limitations, for example, normal, utility, acrobatic, or primary. For purposes of this order, gliders and balloons will be referred to as categories rather than classifications.30 AIR TRAFFIC Aircraft operating in the air or on an airport surface, exclusive of loading ramps and parking areas 29 AIR TRAFFIC CLEARANCE An authorization by air traffic control for the purpose of preventing collision between known aircraft, for an aircraft to proceed under specified traffic conditions within controlled airspace. The pilot-in-command of an aircraft may not deviate from the provisions of a visual flight rules (VFR) or instrument flight rules (IFR) air traffic clearance except in an emergency or unless an amended clearance has been obtained 29 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL A service operated by appropriate authority to promote the safe, orderly and expeditious flow of air traffic 29 AIRPORT MARKING AID Markings used on runway and taxiway surfaces to identify a specific runway, a runway threshold, a centerline, a hold line, etc. A runway should be marked in accordance with its present usage such as: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Criteria for Precision Approach Obstacle Assessment and Category II/III Instrument Landing System
    Canceled by Order 8260.3C [03-14-2016] Federal Aviation Administration Memorandum Date: AUG 1 6 2011 To: Chas. Frederic Anderson, Acting Director, Aeronautical Products, AJV-3 From: Leslie H. Smith, Manager, Flight Technologies~:f~~J~~UO¥' AFS-400 Subject: Interim Criteria for Precision Approach Obstacle Assessment and Category WIII Instrument Landing System (ILS) Requirements This memorandum cancels and replaces the December 21, 2007 memorandum, same subject. It incorporates minor editorial revisions as well as the following changes summarized below: 1. A reference to Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5300-13, Airport Design, has been added to paragraph 2.3.2. Paragraphs 2.3.2a, b, c, and d have been deleted since the information duplicates the relevant content in this AC. 2. The formula for Case 2 in paragraph 6.9.1 has been corrected to reflect the use of"f" instead of"e". 3. The formula at the bottom of figure 5 has been corrected to reflect the use of the airport elevation instead ofthe runway elevation. Change bars in the margin of Appendix 1 indicate changes made from the 21 Dec 2007 memorandum. Incorporation ofthese criteria into Order 8260.3B has been delayed; apply the criteria in the attachments to this memorandum in the interim. Ifyou have any questions, please contact AFS-420 at 405-954-4164. Attachment: Appendix ] cc: Wayne D. Fetty, Division Manager, U.S. Air Force Instrument Procedure Center James M. Foster, Branch Manager, U.S. Army Aeronautical Services Agency Daniel E. Lehman, Deputy Head, U.S. Naval Flight Information Group CANCELEDArthur J. Snyder, CDR, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • TP308 Vol 3.Pdf
    TP 308/GPH 209 CRITERIA FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF INSTRUMENT PROCEDURES TP 308 / GPH 209 – CHANGE 7 VOLUME 3 PRECISION APPROACH (PA) PROCEDURE CONSTRUCTION TRANSPORT CANADA NATIONAL DEFENSE 5 January 2017 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TP 308/GPH 209 Volume 3 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................................................ 1 1.0 Purpose .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Definitions ....................................................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2. GENERAL CRITERIA ................................................................................... 2–1 2.0 General ....................................................................................................................................... 2–1 2.1 Data Resolution .......................................................................................................................... 2–1 2.2 Procedure Identification .............................................................................................................. 2–1 2.3 En Route, Initial, And Intermediate Segments ............................................................................ 2–1
    [Show full text]
  • User Requirements for Air Traffic Services Effective 1 January 2010
    User Requirements for Air Traffic Services Effective 1 January 2010 International Air Transport Association Montreal — Geneva 2nd Edition NOTICE DISCLAIMER. The information contained in this publication is subject to constant review in the light of changing government requirements and regula- tions. No subscriber or other reader should act on the basis of any such information without referring to applicable laws and regulations and/or without taking appropriate professional advice. Although every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the International Air Transport Association shall not be held responsible for any loss or damage caused by errors, omissions, misprints or misinterpretation of the contents hereof. Furthermore, the International Air Transport Association expressly disclaims any and all liability to any person or entity, whether a purchaser of this publication or not, in respect of anything done or omitted, and the consequences of anything done or omitted, by any such person or entity in reliance on the contents of this publication. © International Air Transport Association. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, recast, reformatted or trans- mitted in any form by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, record- ing or any information storage and retrieval sys- tem, without the prior written permission from: Senior Vice President Safety, Operations & Infrastructure International Air Transport Association 800 Place Victoria P.O. Box 113 Montreal, Quebec CANADA H4Z 1M1 User
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Survellance-Reconnaisance Field Army
    <3 # / FM 30-20 DEP/KRTMENT OF THE ARMY FIELD MANUAL SURVEILLANCE NAISSANCE ARMY ^SHINGTONXC K1££ orti HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT DiF THE ARMY APRIL 1969 TAGO 7075A # 9 * *FM 30-20 FIELD MANUAL HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. 30-20 WASHINGTON, D.C., 25 April 1969 AERIAL SURVEILLANCE-RECONNAISSANCE, FIELD ARMY Paragraph Page CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1—1-4 1-1 2. G2 AIR ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS Section I. Organization 2-1 2-1 2-1 II. Functions 2-3, 3-4 2-1 CHAPTER 3. CONCEPT OF AERIAL SURVEILLANCE AND RECONNAISSANCE EMPLOYMENT 3-1—3-6 3-1 4. AERIAL SURVEILLANCE AND RECONNAIS- SANCE MISSIONS Section I. Type missions 4_i 4_g 4-1 II. Collection means 4_7_4_n 4-2 CHAPTER 5. AERIAL SURVEILLANCE AND RECONNAIS- SANCE PLANNING, OPERATIONS, AND COORDINATION Section I. General planning 5-1—5-5 5-1 II. Specific planning 5-6, 5-7 5-4 III. Request prccedures 5-8—5-10 5- 6 IV. Aircraft and sensor capabilities 5-11,5-12 5-10 V. Operational aids 5-13—5-26 5-12 VI. Coordination 5-27—5-30 5-21 CHAPTER 6. COMMUNICATIONS 6-1—6-5 6- 1 7. MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION, AIR RECONNAISSANCE SUPPORT, FIELD ARMY Section I. Mission, organization, and functions •_ 7-1—7-3 7-1 II. Concept of employment 7_4 7_g 7-3 III. Planning and operations _ 7_9, 7-10 7-5 CHAPTER 8. AVIATION AERIAL SURVEILLANCE COMPANY Section I. Mission, organization, capabilities, and limitations __ g_i g-6 8-1 II. Command, control, and communication g_7 8-10 8-4 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Hail to the Chief
    AirSpace Season 2, Episode 3 Hail To the Chief Nick: So, they call the White House "the people's house," and there's an old joke about it being the crown of public housing in the United States. Does that make Air Force One public transportation? Emily: Paid for by the public- Nick: Fair enough. Emily: So, it's public transportation. Nick: It's just not public access. Emily: Just not public access. Matt: Yeah, so publicly subsidized but not publicly enjoyed. Nick: Today on AirSpace, we're going to talk about presidential flight, specifically the people who fly and fly with the President of the United States. We assure you no presidents were interviewed in the making of this episode. Emily: We'll talk about the luxuries and familiarities of one of the most romanticized aircraft in the world with a member of the White House press corps. Scott Horsley: No one ever says, "Oh, have you been in the Oval Office," or "Have you gotten to meet the President?" The first question they always ask me is, "Have you flown on Air Force One?" Matt: And we'll talk with a former Marine One pilot about the seriousness of the responsibilities that come along with the job to fly the President of the United States on good days and bad. Matt Howard: Page 1 of 19 My most memorable flight was to the Wall Street pad on September 14th, 2001. Nick: Presidential flight, from the cockpit in front to the Press Corps in back, and we all know who sits in the middle.
    [Show full text]
  • Airfield Driver Training Program
    Airfield Driver Training Program *This handbook is provided by the Erie Regional Airport Authority to acquaint all employees with the local procedures for operating vehicles on the airport. These rules and regulations are subject to change should circumstances dictate a need to revisit these procedures. It is the responsibility of airport management to disseminate pertinent changes and additions to this handbook. It is the responsibility of the tenant, employee, or contractor to ensure that all employees are properly trained in the policies and procedures for the operation of ground vehicles at the Erie International Airport. 1 ERI movement area drivers training 08162019 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................3 DRIVERS TRAINING ..................................................................................................................................................4 NON-COMPLIANCE....................................................................................................................................................5 DEFINITIONS ..............................................................................................................................................................7 REGULATIONS .........................................................................................................................................................11 THE AIRPORT OPERATING AREA
    [Show full text]