Academica, 152, 157 Aporia, 139 Caelo, 81-89; De Caelo and De Anima, Nichomachean Ethics, 100- 101 ; on Generation and Corrupti

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Academica, 152, 157 Aporia, 139 Caelo, 81-89; De Caelo and De Anima, Nichomachean Ethics, 100- 101 ; on Generation and Corrupti Index Academic skepticism. See skepticism Arab civilization, 170 Academica, 152, 157 Arcesilaus, 141-144; leader of Academic Academy, 106, 118, 161 , 165; Old, 119, skeptics, 137, 140, 141; Montaigne and 139; Plato, xix, 51 , 61 , 63 , 105, 107, epoche, 171 ; Plato's Academy, I 06; 111 , 119, 159; Third, 144----145 Strata, friendship with, 112 Aenesidemus, 141 , 144 Archelaus, 53 Aetius, xviii Aristotle, 63-102; acroamata, xix, 65; afterlife, l 0, I 32 anima, 93 , 96; atoms, 88, 91 , 116; Age of Pericles, 49, 172 belief, 98; binary combinations, doubts, agnosticism. See Cicero 109; body and thought, 96, 97; Bruno, Agrippa, 139 use of Aristotle's materialism, 171; air. See elements Christian interpolations, 70---71; Alcmaeon, 13 compared with Plato, 66-69; cycles, Alexander the Great, 63 , 65 94----95, 95, 96; De Anima, 93-100; De Alexandria, I 05 , 169; scientists, 117 Caelo, 81-89; De Caelo and De Anima, Anaxagoras, 29-34; atomism, 58; links between, 109; Democritus, Democritus, 45; homoemeria, 129; influence, 46; first mover, 76; gravity or mentioned by Aristotle, 99; mind, 33, weight, 113, 160; imagination, 97-98; 54; spiritual transcendence, 56, 84, 158; left Academy, 61 ; life, 96; logic, trial, 50, 52 Aristotlean, 147; mass in motion, 85 ; Anaximander, 4----5 ; basic matter of materialism of pre-Socratics, 55; universe, 4; cycles, 4; globe, 5; heat and Melissus, criticism of, 25, 84----85, 86; cold, 5, I 09; universe, eternal history, Metaphysics, 77- 80; motion and force, 155 31; motion of living bodies, 160; Anaximenes, 6; air, 35; change and stasis, Nichomachean Ethics, 100- 101 ; On 31 ; cycles of elements, 20; death, 132 Generation and Corruption, 89-93; Andronicus of Rhodes, 77 oral doctrine. See acromata ; Philolaus, animal consciousness, 98 14; philosophy, purpose, 98; Physics, Antiochus, 145, 152, 157 72-76; Prior Analytics, 146; aporia, 139 procreation, 95 ; Pythias, 63; sequence Aquinas, St. Thomas, xviii, 102 of Aristotle's books, 89; soul, 96-97; 193 194 Index universe, 18, 155 Copernicus, 155, 170 ataraxia, 139, 140, 142 cosmos, 11 , 88 atheism, 82, 123, 143, 149, 171 Cotta, 156, 157, 158, 161 atheists, x, 106, 171-5 Cratylus, 50 Athens, 1,52, 54, 105, 169 creation: Aristotle, 74, 75, 86; Cicero, 155; Atlas, 88 Epicurus, 123; Lucretius, 132; atoms, 11, 37, 39, 73, 124, 129 Philolaus, 14; Plato, 60, 75 attraction and repulsion, 28 Critias, 51 Averroes, I 70 cycles, 66, 76, 81-82, 85, 89- 90, 91 , 92, Avicenna, 170 93, 94, 95, 96, 109-110; Anaxigoras, 15, 16, 34; Anaximander, 4, 5, 15 ; Bacon, Sir Francis, 111, 117, 149, 171 Anaximenes, 4, 6; Aristotle, 15; Baghdad Battery, 114 Empedocles, 14; Heraclitus, 17, 31 ; Balbus, 156, 157, 159, 160, 161 Leucippus, 39; Plato, 15, 58; su=ary, Big Bang, 74 46 binary opposition, 4 Bohr, Niels, 124 Darwin, 32 Bruno, 171 De Natura Deorum, xix, 152 Burnet, John, vii death, 17, 93 , 132 deists, 171 Caesar, 151 Democritus, 40-46; Aristotle, 90, 99, 116; Cameades, 144-149; atheism, 106, 147, atoms, 42; Cicero, 44; ideas 153; Cotta's explanation of, 157; appropriated by Epicurus, 120; ideas credibility, 146; deleted from Cicero's su=arized, 42; Lucretius, 129; writings, 152; irreversible, 146; opinion perception, 43; Plato, 45 ; religion, 44; of providence, 163; oratorical skills, soul, 42-43; void among atoms, 25 , 88 153; orthodoxy, 156; probability, 147; Descartes, 138, 171 refutations of God, 147- 149; truth, Dewey, John, 144 145- 146 Diagoras ofMelos, 50, 157 catharsis, 51 Diets, Hermann, xviii Catholic ecumenical councils, 69 Diocletian, 168 chance, 73, 111, 113, 123, 160 Diodorus, 152, 168 Christian, 169 Diogenes Laertius, xix, 141 Christian scribes, 71 Diogenes of Apollonia, 34-36 Christianity, xv, 168, 169 doubt, 49, 51 , 58-59, 122,137,138,140, Chrysippus, 157, 159, 162 142,146 Cicero, 151 - 165;absolutetruth, 155; agnosticism, 154, 155; Arcesilaus, 142; earth: sphere, 68, 161 ; destruction of, 161 . Cameades, 145; Democritus, 41 ; De See also elements Natura Deorum, 156; doubt, 154; Einstein, 47, 117, 172 Epicurus, 122; later influence of, 155 ; Eleatic school, 7, 20, 67, 123 Lucretius, 126, 164; St. Augustine, 169; elements, 5, 10, 11 , 16, 18, 24, 28-29, 31, surviving dialogues, xviii; swerve, 124; 36, 58 , 60, 115, 129, 148, 153; air, 4, 6, tutors, 152 8, 9, 11 , 12, 17, 27, 30, 31 , 35 , 35- 36, circular universe, 14 36, 39, 68, 73 , 116, 132, 158, 160; Clitomachus, xvii, 144, 145, 152 earth, 3,4, 6,8, 9, 13, 16, 17,30,33, Confucius, xiii 46-47, 115, 160; fire, 6, 9, 13 , 16, 17, consciousness, 93, 126 18, 19, 21 , 22, 28-29, 35 , 42, 46, 60, Constantine, 169 87, 88,109, 115, 125, 126, 129, 160, Index 195 162; water, xiii, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 16, 17, 29, 17 I; Theophrastus, I 09, I I 0 33 , 68, 73 , 114-115, 116, 118, 158, 160 godhead, 75, 76, 79, 91 Empedocles, 26- 29; Anaxagoras, 67, 75; gods: Anaximander, 6; Aristotle, 73 , 74, Aristotle, 88, 90, 99; cyclical concept, 77, 86, 94, 98; Augustus, 167; Balbus, 28; eternal universe, 27-28; religion, I 60, 16 I ; Cameades, 148; Cicero, 152, 27, 28 155, 156;Cott~ 158- 159, 162- 163; endless motion, 82 Critias, 51; early Roman, 168; endless time, l 0 Empedocles, 11-12; Epicurus, I 31 ; Epicurus, 119- 126; atoms, 124; Greek gods, 53; Homeric conception of, cosmology, 123; death, 122; Garden, 8; intervention of, 134; Leucippus, 40; The, 51 , 105, 119; gods, 121 ; influence Lucretius, 127-128, 129, 131 , 133, 134; of, 120; religious insincerity, 122; soul, Melissus, 25 ; Paramenides, 6-7; 125; works, 121 Protagoras, 53 ; Pyrrho, 140; episteme, 142 Pythagoras, 12 ; Socrates, 54; Strato, epoche, 139, 142, 143-144, 154 112, 113; summary, 50, 168; Thales on esoteric and exoteric, 65 gods, 2; Xenophanes, 7, 8-9, 9 ethics. See Nicomachean Ethics Golden Mean, 64, 100 Eudemian Ethics, 70 Gomperz, Theodor, viii eulogon, 143, 146, 147 Gorgias, 49 Euripides, 50, 53 gravity, 40, 114,131,155, 160 evolution, 5, 110 Greek mythology. See Homeric gods expanding universe, 14 Greenblatt, Stephen, 168 Guthrie, W.K.C., vii fertility cults, I 05 fideists, 138 harmony, 11, 17 fire. See elements heat, 4, 5, 6, 12, 14, 21 , 30, 34, 35 , I 32 first cause, 72, 73 , 76, 77 Hegel, G.W.F., xv, 87 first mover. See godhead Heraclitus, 15-19; fire and logos, 18, I 09; flux , 17 logos, 18-19, 32; love and hate, 28; Freeman, Kathleen, xviii one, 18; religion, 19; Socrates' opinion Freud, Sigmund, 97 of, 53 ; struggle and destruction, 17; unity of opposites, 31; universe as Galileo, 170 rubbish heap, I 08 Gassendi, Pierre, 171 Hermias, 63 Gibbon, Edward, 168 Hero, I 16 Gilbert, William, 171 Hobbes, Thomas, 171 globe, sphere, 5 Holy Ghost, 32 God, 36; Anaxagoras, 29, 32, 34; Homeric gods. See gods Anaxirnander, 5; Arcesilaus, 143; hot and cold, 4 Aristotle, 14, 75- 76, 77, 78, 79, 82 , 83, Hume, David, 171 85, 87, 90, 92; Cameades, 147- 149; Christian God, 169; Descartes, 138; imagination, 97, 99 Democritus, 42, 44, 45; Diogenes, 35; immortality, 9, 10, 13 Epicurus, 120, 121 , 122, 122- 123, 123, infinite, 24, 73, 92, 123, 130 125; Heraclitus, 19; interpolations, interpolations, 70, 72, 79, 82- 83 , 92 70--71 , 83 , 92, I 08; Pythagoras, IO; Plato, 14, 56-55, 57-58, 58, 59- 61 , Justinian, I 02, 169 115; Sextus Empiricus, 147- 149; Strato, 143 ; summary, 106, 158- 160, Kepler, Johannes, 170 196 Index Lactantius, 113 nature, 92, 160 Lao'tze, xiii Nausiphanes, I 19, 120, 159 Leucippus, 36-40; atoms in space, 42 Newton, 171 libraries, destruction of, xvi; Herculaneum, Nicomachean Ethics, 70, I 00, IO I xvi, xx, 120; Library at Alexandria, nous, 31 , 57 xvii, 105, 169; Library at Constantinople, xvii Ockham's razor, 64, 102 Livy, 168 Oedipus Rex, 51 Locke,John, 99, 171 On the Heavens. See Aristotle, De Caelo Logos, 18, 31 On the Soul. See Aristotle, De Anima Lucretius, 126-135; De Rerum Natura , oral doctrine. See acromata xix, 127; destruction, 88,131 , 133; Osiris, 168 senses, 132 Ovid, 167 Lyceum,xix, 64, 107 pantheism, 36, 86, 92, 160 magnetism, 2, 134 paradox, 23 Marcus Aurelius, 167 Parmenides, 20---22; Aristotle, 67, 84, Marx, Karl, xv, 124,127 84-85; cosmic cycle, 28; creation, 74, mass: Aristotle, 12, 19, 64, 67, 74, 83, 85, 75, 87; Eleatic school, 20; love, 21 ; 86, 87, 88, 89, 95, 99, 101 ; Diogenes, monist concept, 22, 25; soul and mind, 35- 17; Einstein, 47, 64; Leucippus, 39, 21; universe, 24, 123 85; Lucretius, 129, 130; Melissus, 9, Peirce, Charles Sanders, 144 68; Pythagoras, 68; Strato, 116 perception, 99 mathematics, 10, 11 , 20, 22, 47, 68, 170 Pericles, 52 matter, 6, 17, 20, 25, 36, 37, 66, 90; perpetual motion, 75 Aristotle, 72, 85, 90, 96; Lucretius, 127; Petrarch, 151 , 155, 170 Strato, 113 ; matter and motion, 155; Phaedrus, 152, 156 matter in motion, 73 Pherecydes ofSyros, 9 Melissus, 24-25; agnosticism, vii-viii; Phidias, 50 Aristotle, 66, 67, 84-85, 86; atoms, 25, Philo of Larissa, 144, 145, 152 38; Epicurus, 123; existence without Philolaus, 14 boundaries, 25; infinitude of space and philosopher, term or word, 11 time, 24-25; universe, limitless, 20 Phoenician trade, xiv Metaphysics. See Aristotle, Metaphysics Physics, 72- 76 Metrodorus of Chios, 50 plague, 134 Michell, Humfrey, xv Plato, 55-61 ; Anaxagoras, 30, 34; Miletus, xiv, I Aristotle, 66-69, 99; atheists, execution mind: Anaxagoras, 31 - 33, 34, 158; of, 122; Democritus, 45; creationism, Aristotle, 2, 70, 72, 93-94, 94, 96-97, 75; Heraclitus, influence of, 17, 18; 99, 100; Diogenes, 36; Empedocles, 27; God, 56, 57; Heraclitus, influence of, Lucretius, 132; Parmenides, 21; 17, 18 ; Laws X , 59, 63 , 81; motion, 15; Pherecydes, 10; Philolaus, 14; Plato, Socrates, 55; soul,
Recommended publications
  • Skepticism and Pluralism Ways of Living a Life Of
    SKEPTICISM AND PLURALISM WAYS OF LIVING A LIFE OF AWARENESS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ZHUANGZI #±r A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHILOSOPHY AUGUST 2004 By John Trowbridge Dissertation Committee: Roger T. Ames, Chairperson Tamara Albertini Chung-ying Cheng James E. Tiles David R. McCraw © Copyright 2004 by John Trowbridge iii Dedicated to my wife, Jill iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In completing this research, I would like to express my appreciation first and foremost to my wife, Jill, and our three children, James, Holly, and Henry for their support during this process. I would also like to express my gratitude to my entire dissertation committee for their insight and understanding ofthe topics at hand. Studying under Roger Ames has been a transformative experience. In particular, his commitment to taking the Chinese tradition on its own terms and avoiding the tendency among Western interpreters to overwrite traditional Chinese thought with the preoccupations ofWestern philosophy has enabled me to broaden my conception ofphilosophy itself. Roger's seminars on Confucianism and Daoism, and especially a seminar on writing a philosophical translation ofthe Zhongyong r:pJm (Achieving Equilibrium in the Everyday), have greatly influenced my own initial attempts to translate and interpret the seminal philosophical texts ofancient China. Tamara Albertini's expertise in ancient Greek philosophy was indispensable to this project, and a seminar I audited with her, comparing early Greek and ancient Chinese philosophy, was part ofthe inspiration for my choice ofresearch topic. I particularly valued the opportunity to study Daoism and the Yijing ~*~ with Chung-ying Cheng g\Gr:p~ and benefited greatly from his theory ofonto-cosmology as a means of understanding classical Chinese philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Cynicism
    A HISTORY OF CYNICISM Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com A HISTORY OF CYNICISM From Diogenes to the 6th Century A.D. by DONALD R. DUDLEY F,llow of St. John's College, Cambrid1e Htmy Fellow at Yale University firl mll METHUEN & CO. LTD. LONDON 36 Essex Street, Strand, W.C.2 Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com First published in 1937 PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN Downloaded from https://www.holybooks.com PREFACE THE research of which this book is the outcome was mainly carried out at St. John's College, Cambridge, Yale University, and Edinburgh University. In the help so generously given to my work I have been no less fortunate than in the scenes in which it was pursued. I am much indebted for criticism and advice to Professor M. Rostovtseff and Professor E. R. Goodonough of Yale, to Professor A. E. Taylor of Edinburgh, to Professor F. M. Cornford of Cambridge, to Professor J. L. Stocks of Liverpool, and to Dr. W. H. Semple of Reading. I should also like to thank the electors of the Henry Fund for enabling me to visit the United States, and the College Council of St. John's for electing me to a Research Fellowship. Finally, to• the unfailing interest, advice and encouragement of Mr. M. P. Charlesworth of St. John's I owe an especial debt which I can hardly hope to repay. These acknowledgements do not exhaust the list of my obligations ; but I hope that other kindnesses have been acknowledged either in the text or privately.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contextual Examination of Three Historical Stages of Atheism and the Legality of an American Freedom from Religion
    ABSTRACT Rejecting the Definitive: A Contextual Examination of Three Historical Stages of Atheism and the Legality of an American Freedom from Religion Ethan Gjerset Quillen, B.A., M.A., M.A. Mentor: T. Michael Parrish, Ph.D. The trouble with “definitions” is they leave no room for evolution. When a word is concretely defined, it is done so in a particular time and place. Contextual interpretations permit a better understanding of certain heavy words; Atheism as a prime example. In the post-modern world Atheism has become more accepted and popular, especially as a reaction to global terrorism. However, the current definition of Atheism is terribly inaccurate. It cannot be stated properly that pagan Atheism is the same as New Atheism. By interpreting the Atheisms from four stages in the term‟s history a clearer picture of its meaning will come out, hopefully alleviating the stereotypical biases weighed upon it. In the interpretation of the Atheisms from Pagan Antiquity, the Enlightenment, the New Atheist Movement, and the American Judicial and Civil Religious system, a defense of the theory of elastic contextual interpretations, rather than concrete definitions, shall be made. Rejecting the Definitive: A Contextual Examination of Three Historical Stages of Atheism and the Legality of an American Freedom from Religion by Ethan Gjerset Quillen, B.A., M.A. A Thesis Approved by the J.M. Dawson Institute of Church-State Studies ___________________________________ Robyn L. Driskell, Ph.D., Interim Chairperson Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Baylor University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Approved by the Thesis Committee ___________________________________ T.
    [Show full text]
  • UT CV 17 Fall
    STEPHEN A. WHITE: Curriculum Vitae (August 2017) Department of Classics Office: 512-475-7457 University of Texas at Austin [email protected] 2210 Speedway, C3400 Austin, Texas 78712-1738 Academic Appointments University of Texas at Austin: Department of Classics Professor: 2005-date. Associate Professor: 1995-2005. Assistant Professor: 1988-1995. Department Chair: 2007-13. Director, Joint Classics and Philosophy Graduate Program in Ancient Philosophy: 1996-2015. Courtesy appointment and GSC in Department of Philosophy: 1988-date. Carleton College: Department of Classics. Assistant Professor: 1987-1988. Academic Training Ph.D. Classics University of California, Berkeley 1987 M.A. Classics University of Illinois, Urbana l980 B.A. Philosophy University of Illinois, Urbana l978 Monographs 1. Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers, translation with introduction and notes (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge forthcoming). 2. Sovereign Virtue: Aristotle on the Relation Between Prosperity and Happiness (Stanford University Press: Stanford 1992). Reviews: A. Curran, International Studies in Philosophy (1995) 143-4; P. Donini, Phronesis 39 (1994) 98-110; M.G. Lee, Canadian Philosophical Reviews (1993) 279-82; G. Lesses, Ethics 104 (1993) 402-3; R. Polansky, Review of Metaphysics 47 (1993) 397-9; N. Sherman, Philosophical Review 103 (1994) 178-81; C.C.W. Taylor, Ancient Philosophy 15 (1995) 228-32. Edited volumes 1. Aristo of Ceos: Text, Translation, and Discussion = Rutgers University Studies in Classical Humanities, vol. 13, co-editor with W.W. Fortenbaugh (Transaction: New Brunswick 2006). Reviews: H. Cullyer, Journal of Hellenic Studies 127 (2007) 251-2; D. Lefebvre, Philosophie antique 10 (2010) 287-90; I. Volt, Göttinger Forum für Altertumswissenschaft 9 (2006) 1083-95.
    [Show full text]
  • DIOGENES of SINOPE Diogenes of Sinope (C
    DIOGENES OF SINOPE Diogenes of Sinope (c. 412‐323 BC), a contemporary of Plato and Aristotle, is considered the founder of the philosophical school of Cynicism. Concerned more with action than with words, he left no writings. What we know of his thought is what has been related to us by contempo‐ raries and later scholars. The most extensive account is from Diogenes Laertes, writing almost 500 years after Diogenes lived. LIFE OF DIOGENES OF SINOPE, THE CYNIC (404‐323 BC) RD BY DIOGENES LAERTIUS (3 CENTURY AD) Diogenes was a native of Sinope, son of Hicesius, a banker. Diocles relates that he went into exile because his father was entrusted with the money of the state and adulterated the coin‐ age. But Eubulides in his book on Diogenes says that Diogenes himself did this and was forced to leave home along with his father. Moreover Diogenes himself actually confesses in his Porde‐ lus that he adulterated the coinage. Some say that having been appointed to superintend the workmen he was persuaded by them, and that he went to Delphi or to the Delian oracle in his own city and inquired of Apollo whether he should do what he was urged to do. When the god gave him permission to alter the political currency, not understanding what this meant, he adulterated the state coinage, and when he was detected, according to some he was banished, while according to others he voluntarily quitted the city for fear of consequences. One version is that his father entrusted him with the money and that he debased it, in consequence of which the father was imprisoned and died, while the son fled, came to Delphi, and inquired, not whether he should falsify the coinage, but what he should do to gain the greatest reputation; and that then it was that he received the oracle.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Word Index
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-76517-6 - Galen: Psychological Writings Edited by P. N. Singer Index More information Greek word index Comprehensive word indexes are available in the modern editions of the Greek texts translated in this volume (though in the case of Capacities of the Soul, only in the recent edition of Bazou, not in that of Müller). The present index contains a selection of terms with their translations, referenced by page and line numbers of the edition used, and is intended to be of help in finding both the translation and the occurrences of technical or otherwise interesting terminology. For certain very commonly used terms (e.g. agathos, anthrōpos, psuchē), where no problem of translation arises, only a few passages are given by way of example; for terms of particular importance to the argument of the texts, most or all occur- rences have been listed. Compound verbs are listed under the main verbal form and adverbs under the corresponding adjective. ἀγαθός good Ind. 18,19; 20,13; 21,6 QAM ἀδιανόητος incomprehensible QAM 48,18 40,22 (Hesiod); 73,14; 74,5-11; τὰ ἀγαθά ἀδικεῖν harm QAM 74,15.17 (matters of) good Aff. Pecc. Dig. 42,11-19; ἀερώδης airy (substance) QAM 45,10 44,13 (with note); τὸ ἀγαθόν the good Ind. ἀήρ air QAM 45,11.23; 66,11 20,1.4 Aff. Pecc. Dig. 42,21; 43,9 QAM 73,17; ἀθάνατος immortal QAM 36,14; 38,4; 42,14 what someone enjoys Aff. Pecc. Dig. 24,14 ἀθυμεῖν be dispirited Aff.
    [Show full text]
  • U Ottawa L'universite Canadienne Canada's University FACULTE DES ETUDES SUPERIEURES 1^=1 FACULTY of GRADUATE and ET POSTOCTORALES U Ottawa POSDOCTORAL STUDIES
    nm u Ottawa L'Universite canadienne Canada's university FACULTE DES ETUDES SUPERIEURES 1^=1 FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND ET POSTOCTORALES U Ottawa POSDOCTORAL STUDIES L'Universitc canadienne Canada's university Steven Tomlins M.A. (Religious Studies) _._„„__„„„._ Department of Religious Studies In Science we Trust: Dissecting the Chimera of New Atheism TITRE DE LA THESE / TITLE OF THESIS Lori Beaman Peter Beyer Anne Vallely Gary W. Slater Le Doyen de la Faculte des etudes superieures et postdoctorales / Dean of the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies IN SCIENCE WE TRUST: DISSECTING THE CHIMERA OF NEW ATHEISM Steven Tomlins Student Number: 5345726 Degree sought: Master of Arts, Religious Studies University of Ottawa Thesis Director: Lori G. Beaman © Steven Tomlins, Ottawa, Canada, 2010 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-73876-4 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-73876-4 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Nnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciaies ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Synopsis of the Aristotelian Commentary Tradition (In Less Than Sixty Minutes)
    HISTORICAL SYNOPSIS OF THE ARISTOTELIAN COMMENTARY TRADITION (IN LESS THAN SIXTY MINUTES) Fred D. Miller, Jr. CHAPTER 1 PERIPATETIC SCHOLARS Aristotle of Stagira (384–322 BCE) Exoteric works: Protrepticus, On Philosophy, Eudemus, etc. Esoteric works: Categories, Physics, De Caelo, Metaphysics, De Anima, etc. The legend of Aristotle’s misappropriated works Andronicus of Rhodes: first edition of Aristotle’s works (40 BCE) Early Peripatetic commentators Boethus of Sidon (c. 75—c. 10 BCE) comm. on Categories Alexander of Aegae (1st century CE)comm. on Categories and De Caelo Adrastus of Aphrodisias (early 1st century) comm. on Categories Aspasius (c. 131) comm. on Nicomachean Ethics Emperor Marcus Aurelius establishes four chairs of philosophy in Athens: Platonic, Peripatetic, Stoic, Epicurean (c. 170) Alexander of Aphrodisias (late 2nd —early 3rd century) Extant commentaries on Prior Analytics, De Sensu, etc. Lost comm. on Physics, De Caelo, etc. Exemplar for all subsequent commentators. Comm. on Aristotle’s Metaphysics Only books 1—5 of Alexander’s comm. are genuine; books 6—14 are by ps.-Alexander . whodunit? Themistius (c. 317—c. 388) Paraphrases of Physics, De Anima, etc. Paraphrase of Metaphysics Λ (Hebrew translation) Last of the Peripatetics CHAPTER 2 NEOPLATONIC SCHOLARS Origins of Neoplatonism Ammonius Saccas (c. 175—242) forefather of Neoplatonism Plotinus (c. 205—260) the Enneads Reality explained in terms of hypostases: THE ONE—> THE INTELLECT—>WORLD SOUL—>PERCEPTIBLE WORLD Porphyry of Tyre (232–309) Life of Plotinus On the School of Plato and Aristotle Being One On the Difference Between Plato and Aristotle Isagoge (Introduction to Aristotle’s Categories) What is Neoplatonism? A broad intellectual movement based on the philosophy of Plotinus that sought to incorporate and reconcile the doctrines of Plato, Pythagoras, and Aristotle with each other and with the universal beliefs and practices of popular religion (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theodicy of Plato's Timaeus
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Philosophy Theses Department of Philosophy 8-10-2021 Reincarnation and Rehabilitation: the Theodicy of Plato's Timaeus John Garrett Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses Recommended Citation Garrett, John, "Reincarnation and Rehabilitation: the Theodicy of Plato's Timaeus." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2021. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/philosophy_theses/298 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Philosophy at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REINCARNATION AND REHABILITATION: THE THEODICY OF PLATO’S TIMAEUS by JOHN GARRETT Under the Direction of Timothy O’Keefe, PhD A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University 2021 ABSTRACT Plato wonders why a good God might allow the existence of evil. This problem is especially pertinent to his dialogue Timaeus, in which Plato describes the creation of the cosmos by a benevolent divine craftsman called the Demiurge. A justification for why God allows evil to exist is called a theodicy. Readers of the Timaeus have interpreted the theodicy of this dialogue in many ways. After showing the shortcomings of some common interpretations, I offer a largely original interpretation of the theodicy of the Timaeus. I claim that in the Timaeus evil is caused by conflict between souls, and this conflict is something that the good (but not omnipotent) Demiurge could not avoid.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter Nicgorski: Cicero on Aristotle and Aristotelians 35 and the Teachings of the Peripatetic School Founded by Aristotle
    WALTER NICGORSKI Cicero on Aristotle and Aristotelians ABSTRACT: Set against tendencies in the Renaissance and later political theory to see Cicero in tension with Aristotle, this research essay reports the results of a close study of all of Cicero’s texts that bear on his reading, understanding and assessment of Aristotle and the Peripatetic school. The essay necessarily attends to Cicero’s sources for his encoun- ter with Aristotle and affirms, with some qualifications, Cicero’s overall continuity with the moral and political thought of Aristotle. KEYWORDS: Aristotle, Cicero, Socrates, Theophrastus, Peripatetic, New Academy, Rhetoric, Stoic, Dialogues, Virtue, Equality, Petrarch. [M]y philosophical writings differing very little from Peri- patetic teachings, for both I and those men wish to follow in the Socratic and Platonic tradition… (Cicero, De Officiis I. 2) cicero was rome’s “best Aristotelian”. (dante)1 The authority of the American Declaration of Independen- ce rests in part on its drawing from “elementary books of public right as Aristotle, Cicero, Locke, Sidney, etc.” (Tho- mas Jefferson, 1824/1973. 12) This research essay provides the basis, in cicero’s own writings, to see his moral and political thinking as a significant Roman manifestation of political Aristo- telianism. It examines closely his assessment of Aristotle’s political legacy and the necessary preliminary topic of cicero’s sources for understanding Aristotle 1 This was dante’s judgement according to A. E. Douglas (1965, 162) and Paul Renucci (1954, 331). A seemingly different claim made by the 20th century scholar Ernest Fortin (1996, 33) was that cicero and Varro are “Plato’s roman disciples.” WALTER NICGORSKI: CICERO ON ARISTOTLE AND ARISTOTELIANS 35 and the teachings of the Peripatetic school founded by Aristotle.
    [Show full text]
  • Marsilio Ficino's Commentary on Plato's Gorgias
    Marsilio Ficino’s Commentary on Plato’s Gorgias Leo Catana Abstract: Plato’s Gorgias sets out to discuss the nature translated in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, but, and aim of rhetoric. The dialogue was held in high esteem apart from the Meno, none of the dialogues conveyed among late ancient Platonists and it resurfaced in Renais- much about ancient sophists. In the Timaeus we find the sance discussions about ethics. Olympiodorus (6th cen- speaker Critias, whose relation to the speaker with the tury) produced an extensive commentary on the dialogue, same name in the Plato dialogue entitled Critias is dis- emphasising its ethical content. In 1409, Leonardo Bruni puted, but the central point is that Critias in the Timaeus (1369-1444) provided the first complete Latin translation did not convey theories under the banner of sophistry.1 In of the Gorgias with preface and annotations. Later in the Meno 93c, Meno had related that sophists (sophistai) Renaissance we find direct and indirect commentaries by promised to teach virtue (aretē), adding that he admired George of Trebizond (1395-1472/1473) and Marsilio Fi- Gorgias (probably a reference to Gorgias of Leontini), for cino (1433-1499). I argue that Ficino’s translation of, and his refusal to make such a promise; all he did was to teach commentary to, Plato’s Gorgias was a significant, but oratory. Gorgias of Leontini (485-380) was a historical perhaps also unintended, contribution to the dissemination figure, who went to Athens on a diplomatic mission in of ancient sophists in the Italian Renaissance. Ficino’s 427, and Plato’s Gorgias was clearly a reaction to his in- commentary to the Gorgias defends a legitimate and fluence on Athenian rhetoric and politics.2 In Meno 75e, philosophical use of rhetoric, including the one we find in Socrates had referred to Prodicus, but without linking his Plato’s own writings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ecology O Critias and Platonic Metaphysics
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Philosophy Faculty Research and Publications Philosophy, Department of 1-1-1997 The cologE y o Critias and Platonic Metaphysics Owen Goldin Marquette University, [email protected] Published version. "The cE ology of Critias and Platonic Metaphysics," in The Greeks and the Environment by Laura Westra and Thomas More Robinson. Lanham (Md.) ; New York ; Boulder (Colo.) [etc] : Rowman & Littlefield publ., cop. 1997: 73-82. reproduced by permission of Rowman & Littlefield Publisher link. © 1997 Rowman & Littlefield. All rights reserved. Please contact the publisher for permission to copy, distribute or reprint. 6 The Ecology of Critias and Platonic Metaphysics Owen Goldin lato cannot be said to have been an ecologist. That is to say, his bio­ Plogical stu.dies did not attend to the relations between living beings and their environment. Our evidence for Plato's biological thought is almost exclusively found in the Timaeus, which considers particular living beings as images of Form. Each living being is a copy of the Form of some particular animal, and all of these forms are parts of the Form of Animal (or Living Being) as such, of which the cosmos as a whole is said to be a copy (30c-d). Each of the copies is a body vivified by soul, whose proper motions are the regular cyclical motions of thinking (36d-37d, 42e-44d). Human beings are teleologically organized to allow these cyclical soul­ motions to occur with as little bodily interference as possible (47a-e). All other living things are understood as deformed versions of humans (42b-d, 91d-92c).
    [Show full text]