DOCSLIB.ORG

This Report Covers Updates to Cleveland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

First Quarter 2019 Vision Report Current Reporting Date: Jul 15, 2019 Report Created On: May 07, 2019 Page 1 Report Legend No Update Overdue # Priority Page 2 Plan Summary Vision 1 Progress 50% Vision 2 Progress 53% Owner: Tanisha Briley Owner: Tanisha Briley % # % # On Track 83.33 20 Status Pending 4.76 1 Completed 16.67 4 On Track 47.62 10 Status Status Upcoming 9.52 2 Completed 38.1 8 Goal: 5 Action: 24 Goal: 6 Action: 21 Vibrant Neighborhoods Cleveland Heights will be a city of strong, safe, Complete Transportation Network Cleveland Heights will be a and vibrant neighborhoods composed of a variety of beautiful homes community where getting to work, meeting friends over dinner, or and buildings, well-maintained yards and greenspaces, historic shopping can be accomplished easily by foot, bike, transit, or car districts, active neighbo... along beautiful and well-maintained... Vision 3 Progress 37% Vision 4 Progress 57% Owner: Tanisha Briley Owner: Tanisha Briley % # % # Status Pending 7.14 1 On Track 66.67 10 On Track 71.43 10 Completed 33.33 5 Status Upcoming 7.14 1 Status Completed 14.29 2 Goal: 5 Action: 14 Goal: 5 Action: 15 Environmentally Sustainable Community Cleveland Heights will be an Business Friendly Cleveland Heights will be a business-friendly environmentally sustainable community that uses green community that leverages the city’s entrepreneurial spirit, well- infrastructure to capture and slow stormwater, encourages active educated population, solid services, strong infrastructure, and transportation, and promotes state of the... proximity to world-class instituti... Vision 5 Progress 14% Vision 6 Progress 65% Owner: Tanisha Briley Owner: Tanisha Briley % # % # On Track 100.0 16 On Track 44.44 4 Completed 55.56 5 Status Status Goal: 6 Action: 16 Goal: 3 Action: 9 Strong Business Districts Cleveland Heights will have an appropriate High-Quality Infrastructure Cleveland Heights will be a city of high- number of strong, safe, and walkable neighborhood business districts quality infrastructure and solid public services that support and spur that serve the needs of local residents and attract visitors from business activity and serve residents. throughout the region t... Page 3 Vision 7 Progress 33% Vision 8 Progress 31% Owner: Tanisha Briley Owner: Tanisha Briley % # % # Status Pending 6.67 1 Status Pending 12.5 1 On Track 73.33 11 On Track 37.5 3 Status Some Disruption 6.67 1 Status Upcoming 25.0 2 Completed 13.33 2 Completed 25.0 2 Goal: 4 Action: 15 Goal: 3 Action: 8 Hub for Arts and Culture Cleveland Heights will continue to be a A Diverse and Open Community Cleveland Heights will continue to be cultural leader that supports an active arts community through a diverse community that is open and welcoming to all who choose to vibrant events, incorporation of art in public spaces, and support for call the City home. the artists and arts organiz... Vision 9 Progress 53% Vision 10 Progress 50% Owner: Tanisha Briley Owner: Tanisha Briley % # % # Status Pending 5.88 1 Status Pending 7.69 1 On Track 64.71 11 On Track 61.54 8 Status Completed 29.41 5 Status Completed 30.77 4 Goal: 5 Action: 17 Goal: 3 Action: 13 A Safe and Engaged Community Cleveland Heights will continue to be A Healthy Community Cleveland Heights will be a city of optimal a community of active and engaged citizens that pursues innovative physical health and general well-being through access to healthy partnerships with local and regional groups critical for providing safe foods, a strong park system, and healthy homes. communities, resilien... Vision 11 Progress 20% Owner: Tanisha Briley % # Status Pending 14.29 1 On Track 28.57 2 Status Upcoming 42.86 3 Completed 14.29 1 Goal: 2 Action: 7 Future Land Use To guide the City’s future development, the Future Land Use section describes the way that buildings and parcels should be used if developed or redeveloped. Page 4 Goal 1.1 Progress 65% Goal 1.2 Progress 56% Owner: Tim Boland Owner: Susanna Niermann O'Neil % # % # On Track 80.0 4 On Track 75.0 3 Completed 20.0 1 Completed 25.0 1 Status Status Action: 5 Action: 4 GOAL A: Revitalize and rehabilitate neighborhoods affected by blight, GOAL B: Continue to promote the city’s neighborhoods to potential abandonment, foreclosure, rental conversions, and demolition Strong residents, especially the workforce in university circle Promoting housing and neighborhoods are essential to a stable community, and Cleveland Heights to potential residents can attract new citizens that revitalizing strugglin... can stabilize the City’... Goal 1.3 Progress 77% Goal 1.4 Progress 19% Owner: Allan Butler Owner: Richard Wong % # % # On Track 66.67 4 On Track 100.0 6 Completed 33.33 2 Status Status Action: 6 Action: 6 GOAL C: Strategically use local dollars, state and national grants, and GOAL D: Continue to promote the preservation of historic homes and comprehensive incentive programs to stabilize the housing market buildings Preserving Cleveland Heights’ historic homes and and spur private investment Strategically investing dollars in targeted neighborhoods is essential to maintaining the City’s character and areas helps maximi... charm Goal 1.5 Progress 28% Goal 2.1 Progress 56% Owner: Richard Wong Owner: Joe Kickel % # % # On Track 100.0 3 On Track 80.0 4 Completed 20.0 1 Status Status Action: 3 Action: 5 GOAL E: Continue to promote and support neighborhood identities to GOAL A: Adequately repair and maintain the city’s network of enhance the sense of place and build pride among residents attractive streets Well-maintained streets provide safe transportation Delineating neighborhoods and benchmarking them begins to build for residents and convey community quality to users. identities among residents living wit... Page 5 Goal 2.2 Progress 35% Goal 2.4 Progress 25% Owner: Susanna Niermann O'Neil Owner: Richard Wong % # % # Status Pending 20.0 1 On Track 25.0 1 On Track 60.0 3 Upcoming 50.0 2 Status Completed 20.0 1 Status Completed 25.0 1 Action: 5 Action: 4 GOAL B: Ensure parking accessibility, availability, technology, and GOAL D: Develop a bicycle network that incorporates management are conducive to shopping, living, or opening a business recommendations of the eastside greenway plan and local bicycle The ease of parking is essential to attracting the shoppers and plans, and achieves silver bicycle friendly community designation A residents that make Clevela... complete bicycle network that incorporates ... Goal 2.5 Progress 83% Goal 2.6 Progress 50% Owner: Richard Wong Owner: Richard Wong % # % # On Track 33.33 1 On Track 50.0 1 Completed 66.67 2 Completed 50.0 1 Status Status Action: 3 Action: 2 GOAL E: Promote biking and walking with a system of complete streets GOAL F: Review the sidewalk network to ensure a well-connected that incorporate options for all types of transportation Complete system of routes that are accessible for residents of all abilities As a streets provide safe and comfortable spaces for people of differing walkable community, Cleveland Heights relies on a safe and abilities to bike, walk,... accessible sidewalk network to c... Goal 3.1 Progress 26% Goal 3.2 Progress 40% Owner: Collette Clinkscale Owner: Joe Kickel % # % # Status Pending 20.0 1 On Track 100.0 2 On Track 60.0 3 Status Completed 20.0 1 Status Action: 5 Action: 2 GOAL A: As part of an integrated plan, use green infrastructure in GOAL B: promote and use energy efficient echnologiest such as LED public projects and promote it in private investments in order to lights or alternative energy sources to reduce the city’s carbon minimize the impact on the city’s sewer infrastructure Green footprint and be more sustainable Energy efficient echnologiest can infrastructure such as rain barre... reduce the City’s carbon foo... Page 6 Goal 3.3 Progress 29% Goal 3.5 Progress 69% Owner: Susanna Niermann O'Neil Owner: Richard Wong % # % # On Track 80.0 4 On Track 100.0 1 Upcoming 20.0 1 Status Status Action: 5 Action: 1 GOAL C: Promote walking or biking as a more sustainable way to get GOAL E: Continue to promote sustainability through city regulations, around Active transportation—getting around on foot or by such as the adopted sustainable zoning code amendment A Zoning bike—promotes healthy lifestyles, reduces carbon emissions, and Ordinance should require, allow, and encourage a variety of lowers the requirements for parking. sustainable development techniques,... Goal 4.1 Progress 10% Goal 4.2 Progress 78% Owner: Tim Boland Owner: Tim Boland % # % # On Track 100.0 4 On Track 50.0 1 Completed 50.0 1 Status Status Action: 4 Action: 2 GOAL A: Partner with institutions and capitalize on proximity to GOAL B: Work with local and regional economic development capture university circle spin-off development Cultural and organizations to increase the number of high-paying jobs available in educational institutions are hotbeds of innovative people and new the city by assisting the expansion of existing businesses and ideas that can spur new businesses. attracting new ones Assisting in the... Goal 4.3 Progress 25% Goal 4.4 Progress 75% Owner: Tim Boland Owner: Tim Boland % # % # On Track 100.0 1 On Track 50.0 2 Completed 50.0 2 Status Status Action: 1 Action: 4 GOAL C: Invest in infrastructure that supports businesses GOAL D: Promote and support the city’s start-up culture to grow new Infrastructure is a key reason businesses choose to locate in a businesses Cleveland Heights’ start-up culture and innovative community, and having strong infrastructure can be attractive to residents can be harnessed as a powerful force for new development.
Recommended publications
  • Chartbook on Women's Progress

    Chartbook on Women's Progress

    FUTURE OF WORK@50+ NOVEMBERMONTH 2015 Research Report Looking Back, Looking Ahead: Chartbook on Women’s Progress Ariane Hegewisch Jeff Hayes Jessica Milli Elyse Shaw Heidi Hartmann Institute for Women’s Policy Research Acknowledgments We would like to thank the following members of the AARP Public Policy Institute and AARP’s Office of Policy Integration for their contributions to this paper: Lori Trawinski, Sara Rix, Donald Redfoot, Christina Fitzpatrick, Gary Koenig, Mikki Waid, Alison Shelton, and Julia Alexis. Also, we would like to thank Allison Porter for her assistance as well as an external, anonymous peer reviewer for their time and valuable contributions. AARP’s Public Policy Institute informs and stimulates public debate on the issues we face as we age. Through research, analysis, and dialogue with the About the Future of Work@50+ nation’s leading experts, PPI promotes development of sound, creative policies This report is part of the Future of Work@50+ Initiative. to address our common need for This is a multiyear initiative that examines the challenges economic security, health care, and and opportunities facing older workers. For other reports and quality of life. information, visit: http://www.aarp.org/futureofwork. The views expressed herein are for information, debate, and discussion, and do not necessarily represent official policies of AARP. LOOKING BACK, LOOKING AHEAD: CHARTBOOK ON WOMEN’S PROGRESS i Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..............................................................................................................................................i
  • Developing Achievement Levels on the National Assessment of Educational Progress for Writing Grades 8 and 12 in 2011 and Grade 4 in 2013

    Developing Achievement Levels on the National Assessment of Educational Progress for Writing Grades 8 and 12 in 2011 and Grade 4 in 2013

    National Assessment Governing Board Developing Achievement Levels on the National Assessment of Educational Progress for Writing Grades 8 and 12 in 2011 and Grade 4 in 2013 Submitted to: Dr. Susan Loomis National Assessment Governing Board 800 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 825 Washington, DC 20002-4233 Email: [email protected] Phone: 202.357.6940 This study was funded by the National Assessment Governing Board under Contract ED-NAG-10-C-0003. Submitted by: Measured Progress 100 Education Way Dover, NH 03820 Phone: 603.749.9102 NAEP Writing ALS Design Document March 10, 2011 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................. 5 Purpose of This Document ................................................................................. 5 Organization of This Document ......................................................................... 6 Methodology ............................................................................................................ 7 Body of Work ...................................................................................................... 7 BoW Technological Integration and Enhancements (BoWTIE) ..................... 10 Research Studies ..................................................................................................... 13 Field Trial .......................................................................................................... 13 Hardware ....................................................................................................
  • Module 3 Slide Handouts

    Module 3 Slide Handouts

    Pathways of Progress­­™ Module 3: The Logic Behind Pathways of Progress TM Three Guiding Principles in Establishing Pathways of Progress Matter Individual Student Learning Goals • We know that the level of skills for a student at the Meaningful. beginning of the year is an important predictor of their – Goals should support students to achieve meaningful outcomes or increase the likelihood of achieving meaningful and important end of year outcome (partial eta squared = 71%). outcomes. • Pathways of Progress contributes to initial skills in Ambitious. predicting later outcomes (partial eta squared = 17%). – Above typical or well above typical progress are ambitious goals. – Typical progress may be sufficient for students who are at or above benchmark – Typical progress may not be adequate for students who are likely to need additional support to achieve benchmark goals. – Below typical or well below typical progress are just not very ambitious. Attainable. – High in the well above typical range is probably not attainable. – Typical and above typical progress is readily attainable. – Well below typical and below typical progress may be attainable, but are not ambitious or meaningful. Pathways of ProgressTM ©2015 Dynamic Measurement Group 33 Pathways of ProgressTM ©2015 Dynamic Measurement Group 34 Considerations in Establishing Considerations in Establishing Student Learning Goals Student Learning Goals DIBELS Next informed considerations: Other considerations: What rate of progress is above typical progress What rate of progress is possible with a very compared to other students with similar initial skills? effective, research based intervention? What rate of progress is necessary to narrow the What resources are available to support instruction achievement gap with students making adequate and intervention? progress? What is the student attendance pattern? What rate of progress is necessary to achieve important benchmark goals.
  • No Data No Progress

    No Data No Progress

    No Data–No Progress Data Collection in Countries Participating in the Decade of Roma Inclusion 2005–2015 INFANT MORTALITY RATE Country Year Roma 2005 No Data Albania PRIMARY EDUCATION COMPLETION RATE Most Recent No Data Country Year Roma Bosnia and 2005 No Data 2005 14% Herzegovina Most Recent No Data Albania Most Recent Insuffi cient Data 2005 25 per 1000 Bulgaria Bosnia and 2005 No Data Most Recent 25 per 1000 Herzegovina Most Recent No Data 2005 25.1 per 1000 Croatia 2005 28.3% Most Recent 11.5 per 1000 Bulgaria Most Recent 31.6% 2005 No Data Czech Republic 2005 No Data Most Recent No Data Croatia Most Recent No Data 2005 No Data Hungary Czech 2005 No Data Most Recent No Data Republic Most Recent No Data 2005 Insuffi cient Data Macedonia 2005 76% Most Recent Insuffi cient Data Hungary Most Recent No Newer Data 2005 No Data Montenegro 2005 50.8% Most Recent No Data Macedonia Most Recent No Data 2005 Insuffi cient Data Romania 2005 9.2% Most Recent No Data Montenegro Most Recent 20% 2005 25 per 1000 Serbia 2005 31.7% Most Recent No Newer Data Romania Most Recent 19.7% 2005 No Data Slovakia 2005 22.7% Most Recent No Data Serbia Most Recent No Data 2005 Insuffi cient Data Spain 2005 No Data Most Recent No Data Slovakia Most Recent No Data 2005 No Data Spain Most Recent No Data OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATIONS No Data—No Progress Data Collection in Countries Participating in the Decade of Roma Inclusion 2005–2015 No Data—No Progress Data Collection in Countries Participating in the Decade of Roma Inclusion 2005–2015 June 2010 Roma Initiatives OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATIONS Copyright © 2010 by the Open Society Institute.
  • How Do Pupils Progress During Key Stages 2 and 3?

    How Do Pupils Progress During Key Stages 2 and 3?

    Research Report DFE-RR096 How do pupils progress during Key Stages 2 and 3? Education Standards Analysis and Research Division Department for Education Executive Summary What’s in this Report? How do Pupils Progress During Key Stages 2 and 3? presents statistical analysis of pupils’ progress in reading, writing and maths during years 3-9, based on a sample of termly teacher assessments for over 70,000 pupils in 10 Local Authorities. The main issues addressed are when most progress is made, who makes most progress, how termly progress adds up to expected threshold levels of achievement, and what progress through National Curriculum Key Stages 2 and 3 looks like empirically – the patterns and pathways actually followed by pupils. What are the Key Findings from the Analysis? Learning Pathways (details in Chapter 5) • For many pupils, progress during Key Stages 2 and 3 is not linear and continuous; episodes of regression to an earlier level of attainment, or remaining at the same level for a period, are part of the norm. • Patterns of progress are highly individual; there is low concentration of pupils into one pathway or another, especially in reading and writing. • The more progress a pupil made in the previous term, the less likely they are to make progress the following term, and vice versa. Timing of Progress (details in Chapter 1) • More progress is made per year in Key Stage 2 than Key Stage 3 in all three subjects, but especially in reading and writing. • Pupils make most progress during the summer term and least progress during the autumn term.
  • A Path to Empowerment: the Role of Corporations in Supporting Women's

    A Path to Empowerment: the Role of Corporations in Supporting Women's

    A Path to Empowerment: The role of corporations in supporting women’s economic progress Jane Nelson, Marli Porth, Kara Valikai, and Honor McGee Summary report of a roundtable series on women’s economic empowerment Written by Jane Nelson, Marli Porth, Kara Valikai, and Honor McGee Designed by Alison Beanland Photographs: All the photographs on the cover and throughout the report are representative of women employees, business partners, individual contributors or community partners of companies that participated in the Path to Empowerment roundtable series and are profiled in the report. Cover photos are as follows: Top Row (L to R): Qualcomm community partner (Indonesia); SABMiller retailer (Colombia); Amway Business Owner (Thailand); Coca-Cola retailer (The Philippines); Kate Spade & Company artisan (Rwanda); Amway Business Owner (United States); Walmart factory worker (China); Walmart smallholder farmer (Rwanda). Bottom Row (L to R): ExxonMobil engineer trainee (Papua New Guinea); Amway Business Owner (United States); Kate Spade & Company artisans (Rwanda); Walmart supplier (Guatemala); Walmart smallholder farmer (Nepal); Abbott supported health partners (Afghanistan); Walmart smallholder farmer (Peru); Abbott supported students (Bangladesh). Our thanks to these and other companies for providing photographs. © 2015 by the CSR Initiative at the Harvard Kennedy School and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation Corporate Citizenship Center. The material in this publication is copyrighted. Quoting, copying, and/or reproducing portions or all of this work is permitted providing the following citation is used: Nelson, Jane, Marli Porth, Kara Valikai, and Honor McGee (2015). “A Path to Empowerment: The role of corporations in supporting women’s economic progress.” Cambridge, MA: The CSR Initiative at the Harvard Kennedy School and the U.S.
  • National Seed Strategy

    National Seed Strategy

    NATIONAL SEED STRATEGY for Rehabilitation and Restoration Making Progress The Plant Conservation Alliance (PCA) is a public-private partnership of organizations that share the same goal: to protect native plants by ensuring that native plant populations and their communities are maintained, enhanced, and restored. The PCA Federal Committee, chaired by the Bureau of Land Management, developed the “National Seed Strategy for Rehabilitation and Restoration 2015-2020” in cooperation with federal and non-federal partners. For more information on the Plant Conservation Alliance and its members and activities, please visit http://www.blm.gov/pca. Copies of this publication may be obtained online at www.blm.gov/seedstrategy. NATIONAL SEED STRATEGY Making Progress 2 Table of Contents National Seed Strategy for Rehabilitation and Restoration: Making Progress ............................................ 5 Status by Goal ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Goal One ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Goal Two ............................................................................................................................................... 8 Goal Three ............................................................................................................................................. 9 Goal Four ............................................................................................................................................
  • Deliverable 8: Revised Literature Review and Gap Analysis for Phase 1

    Deliverable 8: Revised Literature Review and Gap Analysis for Phase 1

    BIOREDD+ Program DELIVERABLE 8: REVISED LITERATURE REVIEW AND GAP ANALYSIS FOR PHASE 1 Subcontract number: EPP-I-00-06-00013-00-EcoPartners Name: Ecological Carbon Offset Partners, LLC April 2014 This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Chemonics International Inc. for the BIOREDD+ Project, task order number AID-514-TO-11-00002. Table of Contents List of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................. 4 1. Introduction & Context ................................................................................................................................ 5 I.1 Summary of Major Climate Risks .......................................................................................................... 5 I.2 Summary of Major Community Risks .................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Summary of Major Biodiversity Risks.................................................................................................. 6 1.4 Summary of CCB Version 3 Updates ................................................................................................. 6 2. Methods ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 3. PDD Section 1 Progress ...........................................................................................................................
  • A Revolution in Progress

    A Revolution in Progress

    ADUs in CA: A Revolution in Progress | October 2020 | Center for Community Innovation Authors: Karen Chapple, Audrey Lieberworth, Dori Ganetsos, Eric Valchuis, Andrew Kwang & Rachel Schten Acknowledgments We are grateful to the California Department of Housing and Community Development for the funding that helped support this research. We also thank Jenny Liang, Lauren Hom, Jen Hu, and Isaac Schmidt for their invaluable research assistance. The Center for Community Innovation (CCI) at UC Berkeley nurtures effective solutions that expand economic opportunity, diversify housing options, and strengthen connection to place. Center for Community Innovation c/o Institute of Governmental Studies 109 Moses Hall, #2370 Berkeley, CA 94720-237 Table of Conents Table of Contents Executive Summary . 5 Introduction . 7 Methods . 9 Trends in ADU Implementation . 12 Barriers to ADU Development . 18 Best Practices . 23 Missing Middle . 27 Conclusion & Recommendations. 30 Endnotes . 31 Appendices . 33 ADUs in California: A Revolution in Progress 3 Executive Summary Executive Summary Executive Summary Introduction But Barriers Remain In order to address the California (CA) housing crisis, state leg- • Finances (27%), lack of awareness (16%), and lack of desire islators are pursuing zoning reform to allow more small-scale (16%) remain significant barriers to ADU development. Juris- housing types, particularly in low density neighborhoods. Ac- dictions also report that the State’s top-down approach to cessory dwelling units (ADUs), commonly known as secondary this series of ADU legislation presents challenges for local units, backyard cottages, and in-law units, are one such housing ADU construction. type. Over the past few years, state legislators reduced parking requirements, lot size minimums and setback requirements, and • Although lower income and lower resource communities in development fees to incentivize construction of ADUs.
  • POLARIZED PROGRESS Social Acceptance of LGBT People in 141 Countries, 1981 to 2014

    POLARIZED PROGRESS Social Acceptance of LGBT People in 141 Countries, 1981 to 2014

    POLARIZED PROGRESS Social Acceptance of LGBT People in 141 Countries, 1981 to 2014 Andrew R. Flores MARCH 2018 Andrew Park EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes the development of a lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) Global Acceptance Index (GAI), which seeks to measure the relative level of social acceptance of LGBT people and rights in each country at a specific time period. Understanding acceptance and rejection of LGBT people lies at the heart of understanding violence, discrimination, and the multitude of negative consequences arising from exclusion and unfair treatment. Sexual and gender minorities all over the world are heavily impacted by the attitudes and beliefs of those around them. Low levels of acceptance are tied to bullying and violence, physical and mental health problems, discrimination in employment, and underrepresentation in positions of civic leadership. Additionally, exclusion can result in lower levels of workforce productivity and decreased business profits. Development of the LGBT Global Acceptance Index. Using an advanced statistical model, the authors developed the LGBT Global Acceptance Index (GAI) to measure acceptance in each country. Acceptance is the extent to which LGBT people are seen in ways that are positive and inclusive, both with respect to an individual’s opinions about LGBT people and with regard to an individual’s position on LGBT policy. KEY FINDINGS Globally, the average level of acceptance has increased since 1980. • 80 of 141 countries experienced increases in acceptance since 1980. • 46 countries experienced a decline. • 15 countries experienced no change. In the past decade, the range of levels of acceptance has increased. Levels of acceptance have become more polarized: • The most accepting countries have experienced increased levels of acceptance.
  • Developing Achievement Levels on the 2011 National Assessment of Educational Progress in Grades 8 and 12 Writing Process Report

    Developing Achievement Levels on the 2011 National Assessment of Educational Progress in Grades 8 and 12 Writing Process Report

    National Assessment Governing Board Developing Achievement Levels on the National Assessment of Educational Progress in Writing Grades 8 and 12 in 2011 Submitted to: National Assessment Governing Board 800 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 825 Washington, DC 02002-4233 Phone: 202.357.6938 This study was funded by the National Assessment Governing Board under Contract ED-NAG-10-C-0003. Submitted by: Measured Progress 100 Education Way Dover, NH 03820 Phone: 603.749.9102 ALS Writing Process Report September 2012 PANELIST NAMES REDACTED BY GOVERNING BOARD Developing Achievement Levels on the 2011 National Assessment of Educational Progress in Grades 8 and 12 Writing Process Report Luz Bay with Chris Clough Jennifer Dunn Wonsuk Kim Leah McGuire Tia Sukin September 2012 ALS Writing Process Report Measured Progress ii National Assessment Governing Board BOARD MEMBERSHIP (2011–2012) Honorable David P. Driscoll, Chair Former Commissioner of Education Melrose, Massachusetts Mary Frances Taymans, SND, Vice Chair Sisters of Notre Dame National Education Office Bethesda, Maryland Andrés Alonso Shannon Garrison Chief Executive Officer Fourth-Grade Teacher Baltimore City Public Schools Solano Avenue Elementary School Baltimore, Maryland Los Angeles, California David J. Alukonis Doris R. Hicks Former Chairman Principal and Chief Executive Officer Hudson School Board Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Charter School Hudson, New Hampshire for Science and Technology New Orleans, Louisiana Louis M. Fabrizio Data, Research and Federal Policy Director Honorable Terry Holliday North Carolina Department of Public Commissioner of Education Instruction Kentucky Department of Education Raleigh, North Carolina Lexington, Kentucky Honorable Anitere Flores Richard Brent Houston Senator Principal Florida State Senate Shawnee Middle School Miami, Florida Shawnee, Oklahoma Alan J.