DOCSLIB.ORG

Stafford Leak Warren Papers LSC.0987

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt9x0nb418 No online items Stafford Leak Warren papers LSC.0987 Processed by Manuscripts Division staff; additions processed by Kelly Besser with assistance from Rebecca Bucher and Kamarin Takahara, 2013; machine-readable finding aid created by Caroline Cubé UCLA Library Special Collections Finding aid last updated on 2020 February 4. Room A1713, Charles E. Young Research Library Box 951575 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1575 [email protected] URL: https://www.library.ucla.edu/special-collections Stafford Leak Warren papers LSC.0987 1 LSC.0987 Contributing Institution: UCLA Library Special Collections Title: Stafford Leak Warren papers Creator: Warren, Stafford L. (Stafford Leak), 1896-1981 Identifier/Call Number: LSC.0987 Physical Description: 148 Linear Feet(281 boxes, 8 cartons, 26 oversize boxes, and 1 oversize folder) Date (inclusive): 1917-1980 Date (bulk): 1943-1980 Abstract: Stafford Leak Warren was the director of the Atomic Energy Project at the University of Rochester and worked on the Manhattan Project. After the war, Warren came to UCLA to serve as Dean of the School of Medicine and as Vice-Chancellor of the Health Sciences. The collection consists of Warren's professional papers, documenting every major phase of his career. The bulk of the papers cover 1940 onward, including Warren's participation in the Manhattan Project and Operation Crossroads, and his subsequent involvement concerning issues and work with atomic bomb development and radiation effects. Stored off-site. All requests to access special collections material must be made in advance using the request button located on this page. Language of Material: Materials are in English. Conditions Governing Access This collection is closed for a holistic description review by Library Special Collections staff. Conditions Governing Reproduction and Use Copyright to portions of this collection has been assigned to the UCLA Library Special Collections. The library can grant permission to publish for materials to which it holds the copyright. All requests for permission to publish must be submitted in writing to Library Special Collections. Credit shall be given as follows: The Regents of the University of California on behalf of the UCLA Library Special Collections. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Stafford Leak Warren papers (Collection 987). UCLA Library Special Collections, Charles E. Young Research Library, University of California, Los Angeles. Immediate Source of Acquisition Gift of Dr. Stafford L. Warren, date of receipt unknown. Gift of Gertrude Warren, 1982. Addition to the collection gift of Jane Larson, 1987. Almost all the papers of Stafford Leak Warren were donated to the UCLA Library on April 19, 1982 by his widow, Mrs. Gertrude Warren. A small number of items, consisting mostly of government publications and materials relating to Dr. Warren's research interests at the University of Rochester and his work on mental retardation as Special Advisor to Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson, were received in the 1960s, when records relating to his foundational service as Dean of the UCLA School of Medicine, were transferred to the University Archives. Processing Information This collection was originally processed by Manuscripts Division staff, 2001. The January 2010 additions were processed by Kelly Besser with assistance from Rebecca Bucher and Kamarin Takahara, 2013. Prior to donation to the UCLA Library, some parts of the Warren papers, including material relating to Dr. Warren's participation in the Manhattan Engineering District and Operation Crossroads projects, had been arranged and boxed in several similarly numbered sequences. In addition, as part of the preliminary processing of the collection, a considerable amount of material originally housed in filing cabinets, was transferred as filed in the drawers into document boxes or cartons and given a temporary number to preserve filing cabinet location and internal order until it could be examined more thoroughly as part of the processing of the collection as a whole. The existing file order at the time of transfer has been retained with few exceptions. The exceptions are as follows: Related items from the earlier transfer have been brought together with items donated in 1982. Appendix A lists current and former box numbers. Some of Dr. Warren's items found among the papers of his first wife, Viola, (also donated in 1982; UCLA Library Special Collections, collection 1322), have been placed with related material in this collection. Transfers from the Viola Warren papers are noted in the finding aid. The arrangement of the papers described in Sections II (Boxes 57-70) and III of the finding aid, concerning the Manhattan Project and Operation Crossroads, has been left exactly as found at the time of the 1982 transfer from Dr. Warren's campus office to the UCLA Library Special Collections. Titles and names of authors, addressees and places have been transcribed as they appear in the papers, except for Stafford Leak Warren, which is abbreviated as SLW throughout the finding aid. Except Stafford Leak Warren papers LSC.0987 2 LSC.0987 for issues of the Oakridge Journal, glass slides and motion picture film, these two series and part of Box 113 have been microfilmed both for preservation purposes and to facilitate creating copies of the originals. Appendix B lists film reel and image numbers in relation to original document reference numbers. As part of the processing of the collection, all boxes have now been systematically numbered with a unique and final number. Please see in-house paper finding aid for more information. Biography Stafford Leak Warren was born on June 19, 1896 in Maxwell City, New Mexico. In 1918, Warren earned his Bachelor of Arts degree from University of California at Berkeley. Then in 1922, Warren received his Master of Arts in Research Medicine and simultaneously obtained his Doctors of Medicine degree from the University of California, San Francisco Medical School. From 1922-1925, Warren completed his post-doctoral work at both Johns Hopkins University and Harvard University. Then in 1926, Warren became an Assistant Professor in the Department of Radiology at the University of Rochester. Subsequently, Warren became an Associate Professor of Medicine in 1930 and remained at the University of Rochester until 1943. During his residence at the University of Rochester, Warren performed groundbreaking research on radiology and its ability to track cancer in breasts. Through his research he developed a stereoscopic technique used to detect breast cancer in women which eventually led to the invention of the mammogram. Before departing from the University of Rochester in 1943, Warren was briefly the university's Director of the Atomic Energy Project. Within the same year, Warren was commissioned as a Colonel in the United States Army Medical Corps and became chief of the medical section and advisor to the director of the Manhattan Project, which dealt with the research and development of the atomic bomb during World War II. From 1943-1946, Warren worked on the safety aspects surrounding the Manhattan Project, Trinity Nuclear tests, and Operation Crossroads. During the Trinity Nuclear tests, Warren's primary responsibility was medical research, but he also supervised the project's health and safety programs. When Operation Crossroads began testing on the Marshall Islands to investigate the effect of nuclear weapons on warships, Warren planned and implemented procedures to evaluate, limit, and control the impact of radiation. However after these tests, Warren became aware of the radioactive contamination in the environment and warned the public about the potential dangers of the atomic bomb. In 1947, Warren was awarded the Distinguished Service Medal and Legion of Merit for his service on the Manhattan Project. During 1947, Warren helped establish the University of California at Los Angeles' new School of Medicine. Warren also served as the school's first Dean until 1963 when he became Vice-Chancellor of Health Services from 1963-1965. During the 1960s, Warren was a Special Advisor who helped research the effects of mental retardation on behalf of U.S. Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson. After Warren's first wife, Viola Lockhart's death in 1968, he remarried in 1970 to Gertrude Turner Hubberty. In 1972, Warren received the Enrico Fermi Award from the Atomic Energy Commission. Warren held the position of Professor Emeritus at UCLA from 1965 until his death. Stafford Leak Warren died on July 26, 1981 in Pacific Palisades, California. Scope and Content The collection consists of Warren's professional papers, documenting every major phase of his career. Materials include glass slides, photographs and materials assembled in connection with Warren's research. His research included fever therapy, arthritis, and the effects of shock. The bulk of the papers cover 1940 onward, including Warren's participation in the Manhattan Project and Operation Crossroads, and his subsequent involvement concerning issues and work with atomic bomb development and radiation effects. Warren's contribution to the Manhattan Project and Operation Crossroads produced a series of photographs of the test area and effects of the bomb such as clippings of blast waves and radiation, and a motion picture in relation to the project on microfilm. Related Material An Exceptional Man for Exceptional Challenges [oral history transcript] / Stafford
Recommended publications
  • The Los Alamos Thermonuclear Weapon Project, 1942-1952

    The Los Alamos Thermonuclear Weapon Project, 1942-1952

    Igniting The Light Elements: The Los Alamos Thermonuclear Weapon Project, 1942-1952 by Anne Fitzpatrick Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STUDIES Approved: Joseph C. Pitt, Chair Richard M. Burian Burton I. Kaufman Albert E. Moyer Richard Hirsh June 23, 1998 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Nuclear Weapons, Computing, Physics, Los Alamos National Laboratory Igniting the Light Elements: The Los Alamos Thermonuclear Weapon Project, 1942-1952 by Anne Fitzpatrick Committee Chairman: Joseph C. Pitt Science and Technology Studies (ABSTRACT) The American system of nuclear weapons research and development was conceived and developed not as a result of technological determinism, but by a number of individual architects who promoted the growth of this large technologically-based complex. While some of the technological artifacts of this system, such as the fission weapons used in World War II, have been the subject of many historical studies, their technical successors -- fusion (or hydrogen) devices -- are representative of the largely unstudied highly secret realms of nuclear weapons science and engineering. In the postwar period a small number of Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory’s staff and affiliates were responsible for theoretical work on fusion weapons, yet the program was subject to both the provisions and constraints of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission, of which Los Alamos was a part. The Commission leadership’s struggle to establish a mission for its network of laboratories, least of all to keep them operating, affected Los Alamos’s leaders’ decisions as to the course of weapons design and development projects.
  • J. Newell Stannard and the University of Rochester

    J. Newell Stannard and the University of Rochester

    J. Newell Stannard and the University of Rochester A collection of papers presented at a special session at the Forty-Eighth annual meeting of the Health Physics Society in San Diego, California on July 22, 2003 in honor of Dr. J. Newell Stannard. J. Newell Stannard and the University of Rochester Contents Prologue and Acknowledgment……………………………………………....................1 Photograph of Participants ……………………………………………………………...3 Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………..5 William Bair Sketch of the University of Rochester Atomic Energy Project ………………………...7 J. Newell Stannard University of Rochester and the Health Physics Opportunity …………………………11 Paul Rohwer Firm Foundations for Understanding Radionuclide Dosimetry and Health Effects ……………………………………………………………………..17 Bruce Boecker Advances in Aerosol Science for Radiation Protection ……………………………….27 Otto Raabe Field Studies of Plutonium and Fission Products in Animals …………………………37 Robert Thomas Radon, Smoking, and Lung Cancer: We’ve Come a Long Way Baby! .........................51 Jan Johnson The Chernobyl Accident: Predictions vs. Reality ……………………………………..59 Marvin Goldman Selected Publications of Dr. J. Newell Stannard ………………………………………63 Prologue and Acknowledgement My first graduate student, Bill Bair was invited by the chairman of the Health Physics Society’s History Committee, Sydney Porter, to organize a session at the San Diego Meeting of the Health Physics Society, July 2003, to acknowledge and honor me and the University of Rochester for their many contributions to radiation protection through education and research. In consultation with Bob Thomas, Bill selected speakers to represent the contributions of the educational program at the University of Rochester made to the profession of radiation protection through all of its graduates. The early sections of Bill Bair’s introduction to the session and of my short sketch of the Rochester Project, also describe, respectively, how the special session came about and my delight and gratitude at the honor bestowed on me.
  • Nuclear Proliferation International History Project

    Nuclear Proliferation International History Project

    Nuclear Proliferation International History Project From the Peaceful Atom to the Peaceful Explosion: Indo-French nuclear relations during the Cold War, 1950–1974 By Jayita Sarkar NPIHP Working Paper #3 September 2013 THE NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT WORKING PAPER SERIES Christian F. Ostermann, Leopoldo Nuti and Evan Pikulski, Series Editors This paper is one of a series of Working Papers published by the Nuclear Proliferation International History Project. The Nuclear Proliferation International History Project (NPIHP) is a global network of individuals and institutions engaged in the study of international nuclear history through archival documents, oral history interviews and other empirical sources. Recognizing that today’s toughest nuclear challenges have deep roots in the past, NPIHP seeks to transcend the East vs. West paradigm to work towards an integrated international history of nuclear weapon proliferation. The continued proliferation of nuclear weapons is one of the most pressing security issues of our time, yet the empirically-based study of international nuclear history remains in its infancy. NPIHP’s programs to address this central issue include: the annual Nuclear Boot Camp for M.A. and Ph.D. candidates to foster a new generation of experts on the international history of nuclear weapons; the NPIHP Fellowship Program for advanced Ph.D. students and post-doctoral researchers hosted by NPIHP partner institutions around the world; a coordinated, global research effort which combines archival mining and oral history interviews conducted by NPIHP partners; a massive translation and digitization project aimed at making documentary evidence on international nuclear history broadly accessible online; a series of conferences, workshops and seminars hosted by NPIHP partners around the world.
  • BIOLOGICAL STUDIES WI'i'h POLONIUM, Radiubi, AND

    BIOLOGICAL STUDIES WI'i'h POLONIUM, Radiubi, AND

    BIOLOGICAL STUDIES WI'I'H POLONIUM, RADIUbI, AND PLUTONIUM Edited by ROBERT 1\11. FINK, Ph.D. .4 s CCT I 2 1 t. C ! I 11 I c ;I 1 P I.ofes SOr of Ph y si olc,eira1 C he m i st r y . School rvf hledlci!ie. Vniverslly of C.ililornia at LOS Amrlrs: Research Chemist. Birminghanl \' et c r a r. s .4 d ni I n i st r 11i on H o sp11 a I, Van Suys. California F,irmer Iy A:sI>iar.t Prufrssnr of Radlolocy and Biophyslcs. Sch(~c.1Of hledlcinc and Denllstry, L'niversiiv of Rochester Ne.*. York . Toronto . London MCCRAW- HILL' BOOK COMPA N+, INC . 1950 PREFACE This volume is oiic of n series uhirh has: been preparedas a record of the resrnrrli uork di>ne under the hlanhattan Project and the Atomic Energy Coniinission. The Iianic hlanhattan Project was assigned by the Corps nf Engineers. War Department, to thr far-flung scientific and enginecritic activities which lndas their objective the utilizationof atumic enrrry for military purposes. In the attainment of this objec- tive. there -u.rrc many developments in scientilic and technical fields which are of Ernera1 interest. The National Nuclear Energy Series IManhattan Pro jcct Technical Section) is a record of these scientilic and technical contributions. as well as of the developments in these fields which arc being sponsored by the Atomic Energy Commission. The declassified portion of the National Nuclear Energy Series, when conipletcd. IS expected to consist of some 60 volumes. These will be groulwd into eight divisions, as follows: Divisioii I - Electromagnetic Separation Project Divisioii I1 -.
  • Scientists and the Decision to Build the Superbomb, 1952-1954

    Scientists and the Decision to Build the Superbomb, 1952-1954

    In Any Light: Scientists and the Decision to Build the Superbomb, 1952-1954 Author(s): Peter Galison and Barton Bernstein Source: Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, Vol. 19, No. 2 (1989), pp. 267-347 Published by: University of California Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27757627 Accessed: 09-09-2019 20:44 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences This content downloaded from 206.253.207.235 on Mon, 09 Sep 2019 20:44:00 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms PETER GALISON* AND BARTON BERNSTEIN** In any light: Scientists and the decision to build the Superbomb, 1952-1954 If the development [of the hydrogen bomb] is possible, it is out of our powers to prevent it. All that we can do is to retard its completion by some years. I believe, on the other hand, that any form of international control may be put on a more stable basis by the knowledge of the full extent of the problem that must be solved and of the dangers of a ruth less international competition.
  • Norris Bradbury Took Over As Director of Los Alamos in October 1945

    Norris Bradbury Took Over As Director of Los Alamos in October 1945

    SCIENCE: Norris Bradbury took over as second, perhaps in their own interest as well. He was on leave from the Physics Depart- Director of Los Alamos in October 1945. This was Bradbury’s forte. We tend to forget ment at Stanford, and he had a house there Would you describe what he faced at that what management is all about, Management that his wife liked. But he accepted the time and what he accomplished? is a tool of leadership. Norris so used it for assignment of Director for six months, just ROSEN: I can put it very succinctly. Op- the country and the Lab. to give time to decide what was to be done. penheimer was the founder of this Labora- MARK: With the end of the war, a large In addition, the people in the military-scien- tory: Bradbury was its savior. After the war number of people who had been important to tific group called the Special Engineer De- many of us had other job offers and many the Lab’s direction and effectiveness could tachment, who had been drafted out of were leaving the Lab. I went to Norris to ask scarcely wait to get back to the place where college and graduate school, were very eager for advice. Norris is a low-key but very they really thought of themselves as still to get back and finish their education. So by effective man. He did an excellent job of being. Most of the well-known scientists were the end of 1945 the staff of the Lab had helping people decide whether to stay here in that group.
  • Trial Run May 7, 1945

    Trial Run May 7, 1945

    trial run may 7, 1945 A crew prepares fission products from the Hanford slug Completed stack of 100 tons of TNT rests on the sturdy for insertion in the high explosive for the 100-ton test. tower, ready for the May 7 firing. Carpenters who built Material simulated, at a low level, the radioactive the tower were appalled, on returning to the site after products expected from the nuclear explosion. the test, to find the structure completely obliterated. Crates of high explosive, brought from Fort Wingate, The 100-ton explosion would have been an unforget- ore stacked on the 20-foot high wooden tower. The table sight, witnesses say, had it not been outdone so men have about 15 more rows to go before the stack soon afterward by the nuclear explosion. Brilliant will be complete. orange fireball was observed 60 miles away. 41 The rehearsal proved to be tremendously valu- devices. Each experiment required different time able and the high percentage of successful measure- schedules, some having to start ahead of Zero, others ments in the final test may be attributed in large requiring a warning pulse only 1000th of a second measure to the experience gained from the shot. ahead of the detonation. The circuits were the re- Blast and earth shock data were valuable not only sponsibility of Joseph McKibben and the electronic for calibrating instruments but for providing stand- timing device was developed by Ernest Titterton of ards for the safe design of shock proof instrument Australia. In addition to these chores there were the shelters.
  • Silage Choppers and Snake Spirits the Lives and Struggles of Two Americans in Modern China Third Edition

    Silage Choppers and Snake Spirits the Lives and Struggles of Two Americans in Modern China Third Edition

    Silage Choppers and Snake Spirits The Lives and Struggles of Two Americans in Modern China Third Edition Dao-Yuan Chou Foreign Languages Press Foreign Languages Press Collection “New Roads” #2 A collection directed by Christophe Kistler Contact – [email protected] https://foreignlanguages.press Paris, 2019 Third Edition ISBN: 978-2-491182-02-1 This book is under license Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ For the people in the world who have tied their struggle inextricably to the struggle of others… and… For Sid and Joan, who insisted that I ‘get off my butt and do something for the world,’ and gave me many tools with which I could try. Acknowledgements Thanks to my mother, without whom I never would have made it to that small Agricultural Machinery Experiment Station in China, and who has been a personal and political compass throughout my life. She sets a loving if nearly unattainable exam- ple and makes me a better person for trying to follow. Many thanks to the people who were unwavering in their support for this long project: to Sid and Joan who trusted me to tell their story, family and friends, who if they ever doubted that I would finish it never showed it, the Philadelphia Chinatown youth who taught me about practice, IBON staff and board, and all the people who participated in making this book so much better. Second Edition: Warm thanks to Ann Tomkins for her invaluable assistance in copyediting and clarification. She will be remembered always for her tenacious com- mitment to struggle for the people of the world.
  • Facility List

    Facility List

    Text size: Smaller - Normal - Larger ­ You are Here: DOE > HSS > HealthSafety > FWSP Largest Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Home | Health and Safety Facility List There were 382 records found for all records in the list. 1 - A.O. Smith Corporation State: Wisconsin Location: Milwaukee Time Period: 1948-1950 Facility Type: Beryllium Vendor Facility Description: A.O. Smith studied methods for protecting beryllium carbide-matrix bodies for the Nuclear Energy for the Propulsion of Aircraft (NEPA) project. 2 - AC Spark Plug Also Known As: AC Spark Plug State: Michigan Location: Flint Time Period: AWE/BE 1946-1947; Residual Radiation 1948-March 1, 2011 Facility Type: Atomic Weapons Employer Beryllium Vendor Facility Description: AC Spark Plug performed beryllium work for the AEC. Records indicate that approximately 10 men worked with beryllium at this location in 1947. Information about AC Spark Plug is found in health hazard surveys, shipping reports and in a MED history. The company continued to receive hundreds of pounds of beryllium for use under government contract into the 1960's. It is possible that some or all of this beryllium was being used for other, non-AEC projects. There was also a small amount of thorium procurement related to AC Spark Plug in the 1946-1947 timeframe. During the period of residual contamination, as designated by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and as noted in the dates above, employees of subsequent owners and operators of this facility are also covered under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act. 3 - Accurate Machine & Tool Also Known As: Accurate Machine & Tool State: New Mexico Location: Albuquerque Time Period: 1987-2002 Facility Type: Beryllium Vendor Facility Description: Accurate Machine & Tool provides machine shop services to Sandia National Laboratory, California.
  • Manhattan District History Project Y: the Los Alamos Project

    Manhattan District History Project Y: the Los Alamos Project

    ., r . ) LA]MS-2532 (vol. ‘ II) I I - ..- [ 4 DS ALAMOS SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY ‘ THE UNIVERSITYOF CALIFORNIAo LOSALAMOS NEW MEXICO ‘} , \ J – MANHATTAN DISTRICT HISTORY = ->=0 c— PROJECT Y THE LOS ALAMOS PROJECT ——— . .. i DO NOT CIRCULATE PERMANENT RETENTION + 1 .— . “. 1-- I .. ,..: ,- . ..= ~ .- ., . ., LEGAL NOTICE This repo~t was prepared as an account of Govern- ment sponsored work. Neitherthe UnitedStates, nor the Commission, nor any person acting on behalf of the Com- mission: A. Makesanywarrantyor representation,expressed . ‘or implied, withrespect to theaccuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information containedin this report, or that theuse of anyinformation,apparatus,method,or pro- cess disclosed in this report may not infringe privately owned rights; or B. Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damagesresultingfrom the use of any informa- . tion, apparatus,method,or process disclosed in this re- port. As used in theabove, “person actingon behalf of the Commission” includes any employee or contractor of the Commission, or employeeof suchcontractor, to theextent that such employee or contractor of the Commission, or employee of such contractor prepares, disseminates, or provides access to, any informationpursuantto his em- ploymentor contract with the Commission, or his employ- ment with such contractor. ... Printed in USA Piice $ 2.00. Availablefrom the Office of Technical Servtces U. S. Departmentof Commerce Washington25, D. C. a . i . ..- . LAMS-2532(Vol. Ii) SPECIALDISTRIBUTION LOS ALAMOS SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY OF THE UNIVERSITYOF CALIFORNIA LOS ALAMOS NEW MEXICO REPORTWRITTEN:1946 and 194’7 REPORT DISTRIBUTED:December 1, 1961 MANHATTAN DISTRICT HISTORY PROJECT Y THE LOS ALAMOS PROJECT ● VOL. II. AUGUST 1945 THROUGH DECEMBER 1946 by ● Edith C.

  • Lawrence Livermore National

    Spotlight on National Labs: Lawrence Livermore National Lab American Nuclear Society Young Members Group Webinar July 16, 2020 The Invention of the Modern, “Miniature” Nuclear Weapon American Nuclear Society LLNL “spotlight” seminars July 16, 2020 Bruce T. Goodwin Senior Laboratory Fellow Center for Global Security Research Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, nor any of their employees makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government orLawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. LLNL-PRES-898447 This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC Founding of Livermore The modern nuclear weapon ▪ I will present the technical history of the type of weapon that is in the US stockpile today ▪ You can read all about what Los Alamos did in Rhodes’ “The Making of the Atomic Bomb” history of the Manhattan Project and other histories of the atomic bomb ▪ You can read a description of the formation of Livermore in Rhodes’ book “Dark Sun: The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb” ▪ I’m going to talk about something different, i.e.

  • 2 the Manhattan Project for Biomedicine

    3ne: Origins of one of the ke rg :rger’s commc in k of contempc Beatty’s essaj __ _.”JragGS 0)’ le “Manhattan - ,-,A came to be connected to genetics, and ;es by which this eventually involved human genetics. His .ves us both a long-term perspective, and a short-term history, relops some of the connections of the HGP and the older 2 Bomb Casualty Commission studies. =say by Alice Dreger on the use of metaphors of mapping in ;entation of the HGP to Congress underlines some of the The Manhattan Project I issues that surrounded the origins of the mass-sequencing for Biomedicine In this provocative essay, she illustrates how nationalistic I entered into the definition of a project that originally was to the cosmopolitan dimensions of science. Timothy Lenoir and Marguerite Hays various historical perspectives provided by these papers i with striking force the complex historical roots of modem A topic of central concern to policy makers since the close of the ics,” and the nature of the interpenetration of disciplines and Cold War has been assessing the importance of federal investment in it forms of training and socialization of the scientific scientific research. With economic competitiveness replacing concerns iity that has produced the dynamic enterprise we now see about military security as a rationale for national funding priorities, is. They also illuminate the importance of the World War I1 there have been calls for a new contract between science and society n bringing about the collaboration of government, politics and establishing a closer working relationship between academe, industry medicine with the theoretical developments in biophysics and and the national laboratories, and creating a supportive environment ar biology, all of which have become involved in the HGP.