2 Col Articles 31/7/07 11:49 Page 12
Military show rrr:2 col articles 31/7/07 11:49 Page 12 Marching orders for truck engineers Money is no object, or so you might think, when it comes to designing frontline military vehicles. It ain’t necessarily so, as John Dickson- Simpson discovered at this year’s Defence Vehicle Dynamics show. uch of the headline news, in British circles at least, from the big Unimog running gear gets everywhere: including this mine-proof MacNeillie Defence Vehicle Dynamics (DVD) display of military vehicles at personnel carrier. Mthe end of June was related to the start of delivery to the British Army of 6,928 cargo carriers and 288 recovery trucks built by MAN of Germany. Yet for engineers the main intrigue of this year’s DVD show at Bedfordshire’s Millbrook proving ground lies in the American products that dominate military activity around the world, not least in Iraq and Afghanistan, where greater technical co-operation between allies surely would be strategically beneficial. But the Americans can hardly be accused of being possessive about their vehicle technology. Witness Lockheed Martin, General Dynamics and Stewart & Stevenson. They have acquired, respectively, Britain’s Supacat, Switzerland’s Mowag and Pinzgauer of Austria and Britain. The main reason why American military vehicles attract the admiration of engineers is that they seem to reflect a desire to devise the best products for the job, not the cheapest. Take the six-wheel-drive Mowag Duro truck chassis, from the General Dynamics stable, for example. It has a DeDion rear axle with high The fence in defence: Force chassis-mounted final-drive units, Protection’s Mastiff six-wheeler with an coil springs giving large deflection, outrigged fence to deflect explosions and transverse location by a Watts and diffuse blasts.
[Show full text]