DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrated Access Management New Ways to Help People Enjoy the Countryside 90318 CA Iam KKM 15/6/04 9:32 Page 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrated Access Management New Ways to Help People Enjoy the Countryside 90318 CA Iam KKM 15/6/04 9:32 Page 2 90318 CA iam KKM 15/6/04 9:32 Page 1 Integrated Access Management New ways to help people enjoy the countryside 90318 CA iam KKM 15/6/04 9:32 Page 2 Integrated Access Management Integrated Access Management What is Integrated Access Management? Integrated Access Management is a new way of improving access to the countryside. The new approach provides higher quality access to the countryside for everyone. At the same time, a better relationship with landowners helps deliver benefits for the environment and the local economy, resulting in a number of gains and the achievement of wider goals. Integrated Access Management means assessing the needs of the widest possible audience, reviewing present access opportunities and information, identifying the main obstacles and then finding ways of removing them. It represents a shift in thinking for landowners and access providers. It moves beyond the enforcement of rights of way, reaches further than the provision and maintenance of the network and tackles the barriers to countryside recreation in a collaborative way. Who is involved? 1. Local authorities. They have a number of statutory duties relating to rights of way and countryside access. 2. Landowners. They have a major role in the provision of countryside access where rights of way cross their land, or where their land is designated as access land. Access provision is a priority for many of the big voluntary and public sector landowners (eg. the National Trust, county wildlife trusts, the Forestry Commission and Crown Estates). 3. Customers. It is important to engage with access users, the customers, including both present customers and potential future access users. 4. Local Access Forums. Established by local authorities to advise on countryside access, members of these include representatives from user groups such as the Ramblers Association and the British Horse Society. 1 90318 CA iam KKM 15/6/04 9:33 Page 3 5. A wider constituency of public sector interests. This can include tourism and transport operators, as well as those involved in education, youth services, community development and health. 6. Government bodies. Integrated Access Management falls within the remit of a range of Government bodies. At a national level the lead department is the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra); at a regional level it is of importance to regional development agencies, to Government offices for the regions and to regional assemblies. 7. Commercial operators. There are opportunities to work with a variety of commercial interests creating various partnerships leading to public benefits. How does it work? The basic idea behind Integrated Access Management is to find ways of improving access involving a proactive, exploratory approach. It involves building on traditional and existing access and rights of way work, but focussing on the needs of users and working with landowners and land managers, in partnerships with the other public and private sector interests. A demand study, good partnership working, serious commitment on all sides (users, land managers and local authorities), and innovative ideas are all essentials. Where did the ideas come from? In 2000 the Countryside Agency decided to support and subsequently review six demonstration integrated access projects across England. These projects aimed to show how existing access could be improved by linking countryside recreation to wider issues such as public transport and the availability of better information. Lancashire County Council and Surrey County Council hosted county-wide projects. Another, in southeast Hampshire, was also hosted by a county council, but covered only part of the county.Two projects operated within protected landscapes.These were hosted by the Chilterns AONB Unit and the Lake District National Park Authority. The sixth project was hosted by Yorkshire Water plc, focusing on the land holdings belonging to this water company in and around Rishworth Moor. 2 90318 CA iam KKM 15/6/04 9:33 Page 4 Integrated Access Management What have been the results of the demonstration projects? The results from these projects were extremely encouraging, with some very worthwhile outcomes. Some projects had a focus on physical improvements to the rights of way network or involved public transport initiatives, such as new cycle carriages on a steam train, (enabling users to enjoy a circular route). Others had a focus on better information or Typical responses included: on helping access providers gain a better understanding of the needs “This has been a very timely and provision of access improvements geared to specific user groups, intervention…very worthwhile.” including black minority ethnic communities, young people or other “I don’t think there were any negative specific local needs. Researching and providing for the most important aspects to this work.” local needs is a key element in Integrated Access Management. “We could do with more partnership Integrated Access means joint working across traditional projects like this.” departmental and organisational boundaries and those involved have been virtually unanimous in agreeing that outputs have exceeded expectations. The demonstration projects have shown: how access can deliver social and economic benefits; how access can be successfully integrated with conservation and land management, and in particular how it can lead to better understanding between access organisations and landowners; ways of managing of recreational traffic, and supporting public transport; how to deliver information to the public in ways that meets the needs of the users. What are the benefits? The demonstration projects were able to: deliver against a wide range of objectives (social, economic and environmental); challenge some preconceptions about access, and about who uses the countryside; engage with a very wide range of stake-holders, going well beyond those normally involved in countryside access; draw down substantial amounts of project funding from a wide range of sources; show that countryside users need information which encourages exploration and addresses their concerns; they need a means by which they can travel to the countryside; and they need a good ‘countryside experience’ once they arrive. 3 90318 CA iam KKM 15/6/04 9:33 Page 5 Integrated Access Management addresses all these issues The result is that Integrated Access Management adds value by: changing perceptions, so that action is driven by the goal of providing access, rather than simply providing the components which contribute to access; establishing and creating wider benefits, stronger relationships, new steering groups and better provision of access; leading to joined-up working, crossing traditional boundaries, drawing on resources from other sectors, including regeneration, health and transport; having an impact on partner organisations, so that they too change their way of working; making a major contribution to the development of Rights of Way Improvement Plans; and linking closely to the work of Local Access Forums. The organisations involved in the demonstration programme are now absorbing the principles and practice of Integrated Access into their mainstream work. Partner organisations are also changing their way of working as a result of their involvement in the programme.The Countryside Agency believes the case for adopting Integrated Access Management has now been proved. Key elements of making Integrated Access Management work A balance must be struck between implementing projects on the ground and influencing a wide range of partner organisations. There is a key role for innovative work, using new techniques. The main input required is in terms of officer time, energy and resourcefulness. Integrated Access Management should build on existing access and rights of way work, and on existing relationships, not start completely anew. Integrated Access Management requires a new approach.Traditional rights of way management can be reactive and defensive; Integrated Access Management employs a proactive, exploratory approach. 4 90318 CA iam KKM 15/6/04 9:33 Page 6 Integrated Access Management Practical considerations of Integrated Access Management A dedicated Integrated Access officer can act as a focus. Setting up proactive steering groups, comprising representatives from varied backgrounds can benefit both individual projects and the overall programme of work. A structured approach is needed.This should be based on the best information available concerning need and demand for access, and an audit of the supply of access facilities and opportunities in the project area. This structured approach needs to be balanced with a flexible, rapid response capability. Long term investment must be committed to Integrated Access Management, if maximum returns are to be achieved. Integrated Access Management can be based in a local authority or another organisation. A modest ring fenced budget for a wide range of projects can persuade others to commit financially. Local authority Best Value Performance Indicators may skew the way some Integrated Access outcomes are evaluated. For more information go to www.countryside.gov.uk Integrated Access Demonstration Project contacts: Lake District National Park Authority Environment Directorate Murely Moss Lancashire County Council Oxenholme Road PO Box 9, Guild House Kendal LA9 7RL Cross Street Tel: 01539 724555 Preston PR1 8RD Picture credits: Tel: 01772 263920 Front cover Hampshire County Council Countryside Service
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Written Evidence from Surrey County Council (EDE 15)
    Written evidence from Surrey County Council (EDE 15) Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee The Evolution of Devolution: English Devolution 1. Surrey County Council (SCC) welcomes the opportunity to submit evidence for this inquiry on the evolution of English devolution. We are encouraged that the Government recognises the importance of devolution for strengthening local economies and facilitating a better quality of life for residents. We see this as an opportunity to inform debate ahead of the Government’s publication of the Devolution and Recovery White Paper. We would also be willing to provide oral evidence to the Committee. Key messages 2. Surrey has a huge amount of potential and can play a leading role in the economic recovery from Covid-19. To do this, English local government needs strengthening with more certainty around the freedoms, flexibilities and funding that can be used to implement the right policies for local circumstances. This would increase the chances of a stronger and sustained economic recovery, safeguarding services for local residents and successfully levelling up the country. 3. Local authorities provide crucial local leadership to address the challenges and opportunities they face, so they can improve the lives of residents and the places they live in. They have the depth of insight into and experience of their places and communities. This is crucial as we continue to respond to the pandemic with our partners, and residents have depended on our services to support them through the Covid-19 crisis. 4. Devolution also has the potential to rejuvenate local democracy in England. Disillusionment with the democratic system is translating into poor turnout at local elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Structure 2021/22
    BOARD STRUCTURE 2021/22 LEADERSHIP TEAM President Paula Hewitt Somerset County Council Vice President Mark Kemp Hertfordshire County Council Second Vice President Anthony Payne Plymouth City Council Second Vice President Sue Halliwell West Berkshire Council Immediate Past President Nigel Riglar South Gloucestershire Council Chief Operating Officer Hannah Bartram ADEPT Adrian Smith Nottinghamshire County Council Steve Read West Sussex County Council Matt Davey West Sussex County Council Marcus Lloyd CSS Wales / Caerphilly Steve Cox Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Councils Damien McQuillan Dept. for Infrastructure, NI Ian Thompson Buckinghamshire Council Ewan Wallace SCOTS/Aberdeenshire Council Mark Stevens London Borough of Haringey Angela Jones Cumbria County Council Neil Gibson SMART Places/Live Labs Champion Darryl Eyers Staffordshire County Council SUBJECT BOARDS ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENT SUSTAINABLE GROWTH TRANSPORT & CONNECTIVITY Chair: Mark Stevens Chair: Steve Read Chair: Ian Thompson Chair: Mark Kemp London Borough of Haringey West Sussex County Council Buckinghamshire Council Hertfordshire County Council [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Secretary: James Chadwick Secretary: Liz Kirkham Secretary: Tracey Butcher Secretary: Adele Adamson Staffordshire County Council Gloucestershire County Council West Sussex County Council Hertfordshire County Council [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey Hills Forest Plan 2011-2041
    South East England Surrey Hills Forest Design Plan 2011 — 2041 Surrey Hills Forest Design Plan Page 2 Contents Contents ...................................................................................................................2 1. What are Forest Design Plans?..............................................................................3 2. Standard Practices and Guidance.........................................................................4 3. Introduction ............................................................................................................5 4. Design Brief .............................................................................................................7 5. Consultation ............................................................................................................8 6. Land and Natural Environment ...........................................................................9 6.1 Location and Ownership....................................................................................10 6.2 Site Characteristics.............................................................................................10 Protecting 6.3 Conserving Biodiversity ...................................................................................12 And Expanding 6.4 Safeguarding Our Heritage ................................................................................21 England’s forests 6.5 Delivering the Brief ...........................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • R (On the Application of Lancashire CC) (App) V SSEFRA And
    Michaelmas Term [2019] UKSC 58 On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 721 JUDGMENT R (on the application of Lancashire County Council) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and another (Respondents) R (on the application of NHS Property Services Ltd) (Appellant) v Surrey County Council and another (Respondents) before Lord Wilson Lord Carnwath Lady Black Lady Arden Lord Sales JUDGMENT GIVEN ON 11 December 2019 Heard on 15 and 16 July 2019 Appellant (1) Respondent (1) Douglas Edwards QC Tim Buley QC Jeremy Pike Daisy Noble (Instructed by Sharpe (Instructed by The Pritchard LLP on behalf of Government Legal Jane Turner, Lancashire Department) County Council Legal, Governance and Registrars Service) Respondent (2) Ned Westaway (Instructed by Harrison Grant) Appellant (2) Respondent (2) George Laurence QC Dr Ashley Bowes Jonathan Clay Simon Adamyk (Instructed by Womble (Instructed by Richard Bond Dickinson (UK) Buxton Solicitors LLP (Newcastle)) (Cambridge)) Appellant (1):- Lancashire County Council Respondents:- (1) Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2) Janine Bebbington Appellant (2):- NHS Property Services Ltd Respondents:- (1) Surrey County Council Legal Services instructed by Surrey County Council (2) Timothy Jones LORD CARNWATH AND LORD SALES: (with whom Lady Black agrees) Introduction 1. The principal issue in these two appeals relates to the circumstances in which the concept of “statutory incompatibility” will defeat an application to register land as a town or village green where the land is held by a public authority for statutory purposes. In R (Newhaven Port & Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council [2015] UKSC 7; [2015] AC 1547 (“Newhaven”) this court held that the duty under section 15 of the Commons Act 2006 did not extend to an area held under the specific statutes relating to the Newhaven Harbour.
    [Show full text]
  • SCHEDULE of REGISTERS/INFORMATION for LOCAL SEARCH ENQUIRIES May 2019 Information Note
    SCHEDULE OF REGISTERS/INFORMATION FOR LOCAL SEARCH ENQUIRIES May 2019 Information Note We strongly recommend that Personal Searches are only carried out by experienced individuals due to the complex nature of the process. Mole Valley District Council offers a “one-stop shop” service for Local Land Charges and search information by appointment only. Normal office hours are 08.30 - 17.00, Monday - Friday excluding Bank Holidays. The Highways information required to answer the Highways CON29 enquiries can be obtained by contacting Surrey County Council Highways Information team. A fee will be payable for this service. For more information, call them on 020 8541 8926. The Local Land Charges Register at Mole Valley District Council is held in electronic format. Therefore, the Personal Search of the Local Land Charges Register will be undertaken on your behalf by our staff, and a printout of all Local Land Charges will be provided at no extra charge to the Personal Search agent. Other search information required to complete form CON29 is held in a variety of methods, including Pre-unrefined and Unrefined formats. Personal Searches must be booked in advance by telephoning our Customer Service Unit on 01306 885001 between 08.30 and 17.00 Monday to Friday. All Personal Search appointments must be made (a minimum of) three working days after the appointment is requested. For example, if a booking is requested on a Monday, the earliest time for the Personal Search will be the following Thursday. Whilst we will do our utmost to ensure that appointments are offered within three working days, if demand increases, then inspection appointment times may vary in line with processing times for other search types.
    [Show full text]
  • List of 100 Priority Places
    Priority Places Place Lead Authority Argyll and Bute Argyll and Bute Council Barnsley Sheffield City Region Combined Authority Barrow-in-Furness Cumbria County Council Bassetlaw Nottinghamshire County Council Birmingham West Midlands Combined Authority Blackburn with Darwen Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council Blackpool Blackpool Council Blaenau Gwent Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council Bolton Greater Manchester Combined Authority Boston Lincolnshire County Council Bradford West Yorkshire Combined Authority Burnley Lancashire County Council Calderdale West Yorkshire Combined Authority Canterbury Kent County Council Carmarthenshire Carmarthenshire County Council Ceredigion Ceredigion County Council Conwy Conwy County Borough Council Corby Northamptonshire County Council* Cornwall Cornwall Council County Durham Durham County Council Darlington Tees Valley Combined Authority Denbighshire Denbighshire County Council Derbyshire Dales Derbyshire County Council Doncaster Sheffield City Region Combined Authority Dudley West Midlands Combined Authority Dumfries and Galloway Dumfries and Galloway Council East Ayrshire East Ayrshire Council East Lindsey Lincolnshire County Council East Northamptonshire Northamptonshire County Council* Falkirk Falkirk Council Fenland Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Gateshead Gateshead Council Glasgow City Glasgow City Council Gravesham Kent County Council Great Yarmouth Norfolk County Council Gwynedd Gwynedd Council Harlow Essex County Council Hartlepool Tees Valley Combined Authority Hastings
    [Show full text]
  • 2033 Adopted Version December 2018
    2016 - 2033 Adopted Version December 2018 Published by West Horsley Parish Council under the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (as amended) and in accordance with EU Directive 2001/42 West Horsley Neighbourhood Plan West Horsley Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2016 – 2033 Referendum Version (November 2018) Contents Introduction from the WHNP SG chairman Page 3 List of Land Use Policies Page 5 1. Introduction and Purpose Page 6 2. The Neighbourhood Area Page 9 3. Planning Policy Context Page 13 4. Community Views on Planning Issues Page 17 5. Vision, Objectives and Land Use Policies Page 19 Policies Map Page 22 6. Implementation Page 54 Appendix A – Schedule of Evidence Page 56 Appendix B – Glossary of Abbreviations Page 58 Appendix C – Land Use Policies Character Areas Page 60 Appendix D – Local Green Spaces Descriptions Page 62 Appendix E – Constraints Plans Page 69 Appendix F – Additional Maps Page 71 Public Sector Mapping Agreement Guildford Borough Council is licensed by Ordnance Survey under the Public Sector Mapping Agreement (PSMA). Guildford Borough Council has granted West Horsley Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group a Contractor Licence. A copy of this Contractor Agreement can be found at: www.westhorsleyneighbourhoodplan.org/o-s-contractor-licence. West Horsley Parish Neighbourhood Plan – Referendum Version (November 2018) 2 West Horsley Neighbourhood Plan A Message from the Chairman of the West Horsley Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group [To be provided following the adoption of the Plan.] West Horsley Parish Neighbourhood Plan – Referendum Version (November 2018) 3 West Horsley Neighbourhood Plan [Page deliberately left blank to provide space for Chairman's Message.] West Horsley Parish Neighbourhood Plan – Referendum Version (November 2018) 4 West Horsley Neighbourhood Plan List of Land Use Policies Page No.
    [Show full text]
  • Hjtleaflet External Revised
    g r eyhills.o r .sur w ww Haslemere Haslemere Cranleigh Cranleigh Surrey Hills Surrey Frensham Frensham Godalming Godalming from danger. from Dorking Reigate Reigate Farnham Farnham on such figures, kept them free free them kept figures, such on Oxted Oxted Guildford Guildford travellers believed that to look daily daily look to that believed travellers Caterham Caterham head Leather historic features to be discovered. be to features historic Woldingham Woldingham carrying the Christ-Child. In medieval times times medieval In Christ-Child. the carrying SURREY Banstead Banstead painting is a 13 foot high figure of St Christopher Christopher St of figure high foot 13 a is painting and meadow with many many with meadow and covered in limewash during the Reformation. One One Reformation. the during limewash in covered the year 1200 were rediscovered after having been been having after rediscovered were 1200 year the An enjoyable walk through woods woods through walk enjoyable An replacing the rest. In 1972, wall paintings from around around from paintings wall 1972, In rest. the replacing rail T Jubilee and the 16th Century addition of the south aisle, aisle, south the of addition Century 16th the and the locality has changed very little over the centuries. the over little very changed has locality the tower and chancel having replaced much of the walling, walling, the of much replaced having chancel and tower smaller the area. The survival of this ancient landscape feature shows that land use in in use land that shows feature landscape ancient this of survival The area. the smaller now remain, the 12th and 13th Century additions of the the of additions Century 13th and 12th the remain, now .uk o esttrains.c w .south w ww or .org.uk e elin v a .tr w ww visit or 2002233 Horsley Diamond Diamond Horsley measure, as it depended upon the quality of the land - the better the land, the the land, the better the - land the of quality the upon depended it as measure, el Line South East on 0871 0871 on East South Line el v a r T call ormation f in bus and train local or F .
    [Show full text]
  • Sheepleas Self-Guided Trail Leaflet.Pdf
    SHEEPLEAS Visitor Guide and Self-guided Trails Sheepleas The Sheepleas is an interesting mix of woodland, scrub and open grassland, situated on the chalk of the North Downs. This diversity of habitats is home to a number of rare and unusual species, which has brought the site its designation as a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). It is also situated within the Surrey Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). It is the natural history of the site for which The Sheepleas is best known and loved. Widely accepted as one of the best woodland areas before the storms of 1987, the beech woodlands were all but destroyed by this natural event. The passing years have seen the spread of naturally regenerated ash in place of beech and the increase of grassland areas. This change has been of great benefit to many rare and beautiful insects, especially butterflies, which can be seen throughout the site during spring and summer. Evidence of mankind’s use of the area can be found throughout the site. The open meadows are the ‘Leas’ from which the site gets its name; sheep would have grazed these once. Other areas were once tended by prisoners of war during World War 11. Look closely for old boundary banks and ditches in the woodlands, even the trees themselves can give clues to the past, such as those to be found on the woodland trail at Yew and Box Walk. Part of The Sheepleas was bought by Surrey County Council (SCC) in 1936 to protect the area from development, and this was added to in the 1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey County Council School Term Dates
    Surrey County Council School Term Dates OtisWell-set sloshes and electrically?decimal Tanner Liam recombining still disgusts her wild definiendum while princely rename Dani ordepopulates interpenetrating that inanities. immanence. Is Yale enclosed when Dad was the council school terms dates can also subscribe we do we liaise with local We offer a broad and challe. Surrey county council school term dates in? But have aged out and surrey county council school term dates as a successful scout concert that all. These will demonstrate your interviewer in surrey county council school term dates! At Cambridge he attended a passage on leadership for Scouts. Caledonian Double and wake in Scotland to Highland porridge with honey for breakfast. What to term dates and surrey county council know when you are reassuring children. School term date that surrey county council. Here for variations to print, legal duty to study piano down is a true, but she stresses limiting alcohol and updates and. School term dates West Sussex County Council. Where the surrey county council service in surrey county council school term dates are unlikely to! School Term Dates Primary Times. Reigate, our ethos is beautiful same. Offer unless we heard how to control cookies can recognise your foot and surrey county council school term dates. This website uses cookies to admit your experience. As a family, we agreed that when we buy something decadent, we put the exact same amount to a good cause. Because of surrey county council regarding important child can opt out ofthe camp and surrey county council school term dates.
    [Show full text]
  • Westhorsley.Info Major Planning Applications Reviewed
    AUTUMN 2020 WESTHORSLEY.INFO News and information from West Horsley Parish Council MAJOR PLANNING “I have been APPLICATIONS paid the honour of becoming REVIEWED your new Chairman” CLLR ELAINE BEST IN THIS ISSUE Horsley Farmers Market Village Hall playground gets Plans for next year’s Village Horsleys Railway Task third Saturday each month a makeover Fête on 11 September Group “adopts” the Station AUTUMN 2020 HELLO FROM THE CONTACT DETAILS & CREDITS Parish Clerk and Responsible Financial Officer: Sam Pinder, West Horsley Parish Council, 95 The NEW CHAIRMAN Street, West Horsley, KT24 6DD 01483 901905, [email protected] Just when I thought I had “finally!” retired, I was paid the honour of being Editor: Vanessa Buosi, [email protected] elected as the new Chairman of the Parish Council in May Design and Artwork: The Creative Workshop, Having lived in West Horsley since 1994 and been and ruralness that is West Horsley. Thank 01580 212551, www.tcws.co.uk. a Parish Councillor since 2015, it is a privilege to you, Charles. We will have an opportunity to Print by: Simply Print Partners, 07768 228079, be able to serve the village I’m so proud to live celebrate your contribution once the COVID-19 www.simplyprintpartners.com. in. It was my horse that found West Horsley restrictions are lifted. I should also like to WHPC Photographer: Rex Butcher for me all those years ago …she was record appreciation to our Vice Chairman, stabled in Martyrs Green …I was living Mel Beynon, all the Councillors some All dates correct at time of going to press.
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey Heath Climate Change Study
    Addressing Climate Change through the Surrey Heath Local Plan A report to inform Local Plan preparation September 2020 Addressing Climate Change through the Surrey Heath Local Plan Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Eleanor King, Mark Fessey, Steve Smith, Steve Smith, Senior consultant Associate Director Technical Director Technical Director Rosie Cox, Consultant Jess Wood, Assistant Consultant Prepared for: Surrey Heath Borough Council Prepared by: AECOM Limited Aldgate Tower 2 Leman Street London E1 8FA United Kingdom aecom.com © 2020 AECOM UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) in accordance with its contract with Surrey Heath Borough Council (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles and the established budget. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. AECOM shall have no liability to any third party that makes use of or relies upon this document. AECOM Addressing Climate Change through the Surrey Heath Local Plan Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 Part 1: Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 2 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]