Written Evidence from Surrey County Council (EDE 15)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Written Evidence from Surrey County Council (EDE 15) Written evidence from Surrey County Council (EDE 15) Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee The Evolution of Devolution: English Devolution 1. Surrey County Council (SCC) welcomes the opportunity to submit evidence for this inquiry on the evolution of English devolution. We are encouraged that the Government recognises the importance of devolution for strengthening local economies and facilitating a better quality of life for residents. We see this as an opportunity to inform debate ahead of the Government’s publication of the Devolution and Recovery White Paper. We would also be willing to provide oral evidence to the Committee. Key messages 2. Surrey has a huge amount of potential and can play a leading role in the economic recovery from Covid-19. To do this, English local government needs strengthening with more certainty around the freedoms, flexibilities and funding that can be used to implement the right policies for local circumstances. This would increase the chances of a stronger and sustained economic recovery, safeguarding services for local residents and successfully levelling up the country. 3. Local authorities provide crucial local leadership to address the challenges and opportunities they face, so they can improve the lives of residents and the places they live in. They have the depth of insight into and experience of their places and communities. This is crucial as we continue to respond to the pandemic with our partners, and residents have depended on our services to support them through the Covid-19 crisis. 4. Devolution also has the potential to rejuvenate local democracy in England. Disillusionment with the democratic system is translating into poor turnout at local elections. For example, turnout for the Surrey County Council elections in 2017 was 36%, compared to 68.8% for the General Election that same year. In addition, 41% of Surrey’s residents do not feel they are able to influence local decision making1. 5. Our view is that the forthcoming Devolution and Recovery White Paper should set out a clear framework for devolution, with minimum levels of devolution, so local authorities have a better understanding of the parameters that govern the negotiation of devolution deals. This would then enable the negotiation of the devolution of additional powers and responsibilities relevant to a particular area. 6. Devolution deals would enable areas to empower their growth boards and deliver long-term plans for local growth. They could, for instance, design and implement a local employer-led skills system to increase residents’ readiness for the labour market and help employers fill vacancies. The Growth Board would become the key 1 Surrey Residents Survey, Quarter 2 (July to September) 2020 1 economic development partnership, bringing together local government, health and business partners to oversee and accelerate work to drive improvements to the economy, homes, infrastructure and quality of life. 7. Moving to a simpler local government system would provide a significant boost through streamlining, a joined-up approach, greater accountability, and better and fairer access to services. The current system is not fit for purpose or affordable and is holding back our local areas. 8. The Devolution and Recovery White Paper is an opportunity for the Government to be bold and to bring clarity to what it is willing to devolve. It can support improved and better coordinated health and wellbeing approaches, climate change strategies and newly empowered communities, which all have a role to play in facilitating a strong economy and public services and increased tax revenue. 9. Devolving powers and flexibilities will enable areas to develop their own approaches to local engagement. In Surrey, we are proposing to create 25-30 Local Community Networks (LCNs), based on Surrey’s natural communities and that people will recognise and identify with. These will bring together residents, local government, town and parish councils, other public services and partners to decide priorities, tackle local issues, make decisions and grasp opportunities within communities. Every part of the new council, whether urban or rural, would be in an LCN area. They will strengthen democracy in Surrey by introducing a more local engagement model across the public services system than exists in the current structure. Introduction 10.SCC is responsible for services for over 1.1 million residents including adult social care, children’s services and highways maintenance. Surrey’s economy contributes over £40 billion Gross Value Added (GVA) each year, of which £7.5 billion goes to the Exchequer, has very high business density of 612 businesses per 10,000 population, over half the working age population is educated to degree level or above and has an economic activity rate of over 83%. 11.Given the county’s proximity to London, it is considered peri-urban and has a complex set of characteristics including road, rail and air congestion, land pressure, large volumes of commuting to the capital and a hugely varied environment. These pressures will be exacerbated as the population grows, and the impact of being so close to London is continually felt. The population is also due to grow by 1.4% by 2030, with the older population expected to see the fastest growth rate with the 85+ population growing by nearly 30% and 65-84 population by nearly 19%. 12.While most people who live in Surrey generally have a high quality of life, the county faces many challenges, some of which have been exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic. The list below exemplifies some of the county’s most pressing issues: Surrey’s strong economic performance and relative affluence masks economic inequalities, pockets of deprivation and growing disparity between the east 2 and west of the county. Covid-19 is projected to result in a 14.3% fall in GVA - an estimated reduction of over £6 billion. Housing is increasingly unaffordable, with Surrey’s median house price at £435,000, significantly more than the South East average of £322,000 and over 13 times the county salary median. This is contributing to skilled workers leaving the county. It is also estimated the county will need at least 67,500 additional homes over the next decade. Climate change is a major issue, with 46% of the county’s carbon emissions coming from transport, and 6,900 vehicles travelling through the county each day, significantly above regional and national averages. While our population has average life expectancy over 80, there are stark inequalities across our population in the number of years people can live in good health for. For example, a man living in Godalming Holloway in Waverley borough can expect to live for 18 years longer in good health on average than a man living in Canalside in Woking borough. 13.Surrey is also a county of opportunity with strong assets. The beauty of its countryside and its proximity to London means it is well-placed to support the capital’s revival as a global economic hub. The county can act as a test bed for the green economy, trialling new approaches to sustainable growth that can be rolled out across the country that could also help with the climate emergency. 14.The local health and care system is already benefitting from devolution. The Surrey Heartlands Integrated Care System secured a devolution agreement in 2017, increasing local control over health and care commissioning decisions and aligning NHS and local government responsibilities. The impact of this agreement has enabled the ICS to work across Surrey to drive new collaborations and innovations in services. We aspire to build on this and secure further devolution for health and care to support moving towards our ambitions 15.Local authorities provide crucial local leadership to address these challenges and opportunities so they can improve the lives of residents and the places they live in. They have the depth of insight into and experience of their places and communities. This is crucial as we continue to respond to the pandemic with our partners, and residents have depended on our services to support them through the Covid-19 crisis. For instance, in a recent survey we conducted on residents’ experiences of the crisis, nearly two-thirds (65%) of respondents said they had relied on at least one source of information from Surrey County Council to support themselves. The case for devolution 16.To respond to these challenges and opportunities, and maximise the effectiveness of support to residents, English local government needs strengthening with more freedoms, flexibilities and funding that can be used to tailor policy to local circumstances. Devolution can support policies that adapt to the needs of places such as Surrey where growth is polycentric, so the needs of all residents are met regardless 3 of whether they live on county’s border with London or in a rural village near Hampshire, Sussex or Kent. 17.A clear agenda from Government with well-articulated outcomes and a framework for local authorities to work with would increase the chances of a stronger and sustained economic recovery and successfully levelling up the country. Devolution would give local places the ability to level up within regions as well as across the country so local partners can target resources and interventions to tackle regional economic disparity and provide more opportunities for the people who live in them. 18.Devolution also has the potential to rejuvenate local democracy in England. Disillusionment with the democratic system is translating into poor turnout at local elections. For example, turnout for the Surrey County Council elections in 2017 was 36%, compared to 68.8% for the General Election that same year. In addition, 41% of Surrey’s residents do not feel they are able to influence local decision making2. 19.When we have been more locally responsive and engaged with our communities, this inspires confidence of residents in local institutions, which will help strengthen faith in local democracy.
Recommended publications
  • Board Structure 2021/22
    BOARD STRUCTURE 2021/22 LEADERSHIP TEAM President Paula Hewitt Somerset County Council Vice President Mark Kemp Hertfordshire County Council Second Vice President Anthony Payne Plymouth City Council Second Vice President Sue Halliwell West Berkshire Council Immediate Past President Nigel Riglar South Gloucestershire Council Chief Operating Officer Hannah Bartram ADEPT Adrian Smith Nottinghamshire County Council Steve Read West Sussex County Council Matt Davey West Sussex County Council Marcus Lloyd CSS Wales / Caerphilly Steve Cox Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Councils Damien McQuillan Dept. for Infrastructure, NI Ian Thompson Buckinghamshire Council Ewan Wallace SCOTS/Aberdeenshire Council Mark Stevens London Borough of Haringey Angela Jones Cumbria County Council Neil Gibson SMART Places/Live Labs Champion Darryl Eyers Staffordshire County Council SUBJECT BOARDS ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENT SUSTAINABLE GROWTH TRANSPORT & CONNECTIVITY Chair: Mark Stevens Chair: Steve Read Chair: Ian Thompson Chair: Mark Kemp London Borough of Haringey West Sussex County Council Buckinghamshire Council Hertfordshire County Council [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Secretary: James Chadwick Secretary: Liz Kirkham Secretary: Tracey Butcher Secretary: Adele Adamson Staffordshire County Council Gloucestershire County Council West Sussex County Council Hertfordshire County Council [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey Hills Forest Plan 2011-2041
    South East England Surrey Hills Forest Design Plan 2011 — 2041 Surrey Hills Forest Design Plan Page 2 Contents Contents ...................................................................................................................2 1. What are Forest Design Plans?..............................................................................3 2. Standard Practices and Guidance.........................................................................4 3. Introduction ............................................................................................................5 4. Design Brief .............................................................................................................7 5. Consultation ............................................................................................................8 6. Land and Natural Environment ...........................................................................9 6.1 Location and Ownership....................................................................................10 6.2 Site Characteristics.............................................................................................10 Protecting 6.3 Conserving Biodiversity ...................................................................................12 And Expanding 6.4 Safeguarding Our Heritage ................................................................................21 England’s forests 6.5 Delivering the Brief ...........................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • R (On the Application of Lancashire CC) (App) V SSEFRA And
    Michaelmas Term [2019] UKSC 58 On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 721 JUDGMENT R (on the application of Lancashire County Council) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and another (Respondents) R (on the application of NHS Property Services Ltd) (Appellant) v Surrey County Council and another (Respondents) before Lord Wilson Lord Carnwath Lady Black Lady Arden Lord Sales JUDGMENT GIVEN ON 11 December 2019 Heard on 15 and 16 July 2019 Appellant (1) Respondent (1) Douglas Edwards QC Tim Buley QC Jeremy Pike Daisy Noble (Instructed by Sharpe (Instructed by The Pritchard LLP on behalf of Government Legal Jane Turner, Lancashire Department) County Council Legal, Governance and Registrars Service) Respondent (2) Ned Westaway (Instructed by Harrison Grant) Appellant (2) Respondent (2) George Laurence QC Dr Ashley Bowes Jonathan Clay Simon Adamyk (Instructed by Womble (Instructed by Richard Bond Dickinson (UK) Buxton Solicitors LLP (Newcastle)) (Cambridge)) Appellant (1):- Lancashire County Council Respondents:- (1) Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2) Janine Bebbington Appellant (2):- NHS Property Services Ltd Respondents:- (1) Surrey County Council Legal Services instructed by Surrey County Council (2) Timothy Jones LORD CARNWATH AND LORD SALES: (with whom Lady Black agrees) Introduction 1. The principal issue in these two appeals relates to the circumstances in which the concept of “statutory incompatibility” will defeat an application to register land as a town or village green where the land is held by a public authority for statutory purposes. In R (Newhaven Port & Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council [2015] UKSC 7; [2015] AC 1547 (“Newhaven”) this court held that the duty under section 15 of the Commons Act 2006 did not extend to an area held under the specific statutes relating to the Newhaven Harbour.
    [Show full text]
  • SCHEDULE of REGISTERS/INFORMATION for LOCAL SEARCH ENQUIRIES May 2019 Information Note
    SCHEDULE OF REGISTERS/INFORMATION FOR LOCAL SEARCH ENQUIRIES May 2019 Information Note We strongly recommend that Personal Searches are only carried out by experienced individuals due to the complex nature of the process. Mole Valley District Council offers a “one-stop shop” service for Local Land Charges and search information by appointment only. Normal office hours are 08.30 - 17.00, Monday - Friday excluding Bank Holidays. The Highways information required to answer the Highways CON29 enquiries can be obtained by contacting Surrey County Council Highways Information team. A fee will be payable for this service. For more information, call them on 020 8541 8926. The Local Land Charges Register at Mole Valley District Council is held in electronic format. Therefore, the Personal Search of the Local Land Charges Register will be undertaken on your behalf by our staff, and a printout of all Local Land Charges will be provided at no extra charge to the Personal Search agent. Other search information required to complete form CON29 is held in a variety of methods, including Pre-unrefined and Unrefined formats. Personal Searches must be booked in advance by telephoning our Customer Service Unit on 01306 885001 between 08.30 and 17.00 Monday to Friday. All Personal Search appointments must be made (a minimum of) three working days after the appointment is requested. For example, if a booking is requested on a Monday, the earliest time for the Personal Search will be the following Thursday. Whilst we will do our utmost to ensure that appointments are offered within three working days, if demand increases, then inspection appointment times may vary in line with processing times for other search types.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Access Management New Ways to Help People Enjoy the Countryside 90318 CA Iam KKM 15/6/04 9:32 Page 2
    90318 CA iam KKM 15/6/04 9:32 Page 1 Integrated Access Management New ways to help people enjoy the countryside 90318 CA iam KKM 15/6/04 9:32 Page 2 Integrated Access Management Integrated Access Management What is Integrated Access Management? Integrated Access Management is a new way of improving access to the countryside. The new approach provides higher quality access to the countryside for everyone. At the same time, a better relationship with landowners helps deliver benefits for the environment and the local economy, resulting in a number of gains and the achievement of wider goals. Integrated Access Management means assessing the needs of the widest possible audience, reviewing present access opportunities and information, identifying the main obstacles and then finding ways of removing them. It represents a shift in thinking for landowners and access providers. It moves beyond the enforcement of rights of way, reaches further than the provision and maintenance of the network and tackles the barriers to countryside recreation in a collaborative way. Who is involved? 1. Local authorities. They have a number of statutory duties relating to rights of way and countryside access. 2. Landowners. They have a major role in the provision of countryside access where rights of way cross their land, or where their land is designated as access land. Access provision is a priority for many of the big voluntary and public sector landowners (eg. the National Trust, county wildlife trusts, the Forestry Commission and Crown Estates). 3. Customers. It is important to engage with access users, the customers, including both present customers and potential future access users.
    [Show full text]
  • List of 100 Priority Places
    Priority Places Place Lead Authority Argyll and Bute Argyll and Bute Council Barnsley Sheffield City Region Combined Authority Barrow-in-Furness Cumbria County Council Bassetlaw Nottinghamshire County Council Birmingham West Midlands Combined Authority Blackburn with Darwen Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council Blackpool Blackpool Council Blaenau Gwent Blaenau Gwent County Borough Council Bolton Greater Manchester Combined Authority Boston Lincolnshire County Council Bradford West Yorkshire Combined Authority Burnley Lancashire County Council Calderdale West Yorkshire Combined Authority Canterbury Kent County Council Carmarthenshire Carmarthenshire County Council Ceredigion Ceredigion County Council Conwy Conwy County Borough Council Corby Northamptonshire County Council* Cornwall Cornwall Council County Durham Durham County Council Darlington Tees Valley Combined Authority Denbighshire Denbighshire County Council Derbyshire Dales Derbyshire County Council Doncaster Sheffield City Region Combined Authority Dudley West Midlands Combined Authority Dumfries and Galloway Dumfries and Galloway Council East Ayrshire East Ayrshire Council East Lindsey Lincolnshire County Council East Northamptonshire Northamptonshire County Council* Falkirk Falkirk Council Fenland Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Gateshead Gateshead Council Glasgow City Glasgow City Council Gravesham Kent County Council Great Yarmouth Norfolk County Council Gwynedd Gwynedd Council Harlow Essex County Council Hartlepool Tees Valley Combined Authority Hastings
    [Show full text]
  • 2033 Adopted Version December 2018
    2016 - 2033 Adopted Version December 2018 Published by West Horsley Parish Council under the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 (as amended) and in accordance with EU Directive 2001/42 West Horsley Neighbourhood Plan West Horsley Parish Neighbourhood Plan 2016 – 2033 Referendum Version (November 2018) Contents Introduction from the WHNP SG chairman Page 3 List of Land Use Policies Page 5 1. Introduction and Purpose Page 6 2. The Neighbourhood Area Page 9 3. Planning Policy Context Page 13 4. Community Views on Planning Issues Page 17 5. Vision, Objectives and Land Use Policies Page 19 Policies Map Page 22 6. Implementation Page 54 Appendix A – Schedule of Evidence Page 56 Appendix B – Glossary of Abbreviations Page 58 Appendix C – Land Use Policies Character Areas Page 60 Appendix D – Local Green Spaces Descriptions Page 62 Appendix E – Constraints Plans Page 69 Appendix F – Additional Maps Page 71 Public Sector Mapping Agreement Guildford Borough Council is licensed by Ordnance Survey under the Public Sector Mapping Agreement (PSMA). Guildford Borough Council has granted West Horsley Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group a Contractor Licence. A copy of this Contractor Agreement can be found at: www.westhorsleyneighbourhoodplan.org/o-s-contractor-licence. West Horsley Parish Neighbourhood Plan – Referendum Version (November 2018) 2 West Horsley Neighbourhood Plan A Message from the Chairman of the West Horsley Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group [To be provided following the adoption of the Plan.] West Horsley Parish Neighbourhood Plan – Referendum Version (November 2018) 3 West Horsley Neighbourhood Plan [Page deliberately left blank to provide space for Chairman's Message.] West Horsley Parish Neighbourhood Plan – Referendum Version (November 2018) 4 West Horsley Neighbourhood Plan List of Land Use Policies Page No.
    [Show full text]
  • Hjtleaflet External Revised
    g r eyhills.o r .sur w ww Haslemere Haslemere Cranleigh Cranleigh Surrey Hills Surrey Frensham Frensham Godalming Godalming from danger. from Dorking Reigate Reigate Farnham Farnham on such figures, kept them free free them kept figures, such on Oxted Oxted Guildford Guildford travellers believed that to look daily daily look to that believed travellers Caterham Caterham head Leather historic features to be discovered. be to features historic Woldingham Woldingham carrying the Christ-Child. In medieval times times medieval In Christ-Child. the carrying SURREY Banstead Banstead painting is a 13 foot high figure of St Christopher Christopher St of figure high foot 13 a is painting and meadow with many many with meadow and covered in limewash during the Reformation. One One Reformation. the during limewash in covered the year 1200 were rediscovered after having been been having after rediscovered were 1200 year the An enjoyable walk through woods woods through walk enjoyable An replacing the rest. In 1972, wall paintings from around around from paintings wall 1972, In rest. the replacing rail T Jubilee and the 16th Century addition of the south aisle, aisle, south the of addition Century 16th the and the locality has changed very little over the centuries. the over little very changed has locality the tower and chancel having replaced much of the walling, walling, the of much replaced having chancel and tower smaller the area. The survival of this ancient landscape feature shows that land use in in use land that shows feature landscape ancient this of survival The area. the smaller now remain, the 12th and 13th Century additions of the the of additions Century 13th and 12th the remain, now .uk o esttrains.c w .south w ww or .org.uk e elin v a .tr w ww visit or 2002233 Horsley Diamond Diamond Horsley measure, as it depended upon the quality of the land - the better the land, the the land, the better the - land the of quality the upon depended it as measure, el Line South East on 0871 0871 on East South Line el v a r T call ormation f in bus and train local or F .
    [Show full text]
  • Sheepleas Self-Guided Trail Leaflet.Pdf
    SHEEPLEAS Visitor Guide and Self-guided Trails Sheepleas The Sheepleas is an interesting mix of woodland, scrub and open grassland, situated on the chalk of the North Downs. This diversity of habitats is home to a number of rare and unusual species, which has brought the site its designation as a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). It is also situated within the Surrey Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). It is the natural history of the site for which The Sheepleas is best known and loved. Widely accepted as one of the best woodland areas before the storms of 1987, the beech woodlands were all but destroyed by this natural event. The passing years have seen the spread of naturally regenerated ash in place of beech and the increase of grassland areas. This change has been of great benefit to many rare and beautiful insects, especially butterflies, which can be seen throughout the site during spring and summer. Evidence of mankind’s use of the area can be found throughout the site. The open meadows are the ‘Leas’ from which the site gets its name; sheep would have grazed these once. Other areas were once tended by prisoners of war during World War 11. Look closely for old boundary banks and ditches in the woodlands, even the trees themselves can give clues to the past, such as those to be found on the woodland trail at Yew and Box Walk. Part of The Sheepleas was bought by Surrey County Council (SCC) in 1936 to protect the area from development, and this was added to in the 1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey County Council School Term Dates
    Surrey County Council School Term Dates OtisWell-set sloshes and electrically?decimal Tanner Liam recombining still disgusts her wild definiendum while princely rename Dani ordepopulates interpenetrating that inanities. immanence. Is Yale enclosed when Dad was the council school terms dates can also subscribe we do we liaise with local We offer a broad and challe. Surrey county council school term dates in? But have aged out and surrey county council school term dates as a successful scout concert that all. These will demonstrate your interviewer in surrey county council school term dates! At Cambridge he attended a passage on leadership for Scouts. Caledonian Double and wake in Scotland to Highland porridge with honey for breakfast. What to term dates and surrey county council know when you are reassuring children. School term date that surrey county council. Here for variations to print, legal duty to study piano down is a true, but she stresses limiting alcohol and updates and. School term dates West Sussex County Council. Where the surrey county council service in surrey county council school term dates are unlikely to! School Term Dates Primary Times. Reigate, our ethos is beautiful same. Offer unless we heard how to control cookies can recognise your foot and surrey county council school term dates. This website uses cookies to admit your experience. As a family, we agreed that when we buy something decadent, we put the exact same amount to a good cause. Because of surrey county council regarding important child can opt out ofthe camp and surrey county council school term dates.
    [Show full text]
  • Westhorsley.Info Major Planning Applications Reviewed
    AUTUMN 2020 WESTHORSLEY.INFO News and information from West Horsley Parish Council MAJOR PLANNING “I have been APPLICATIONS paid the honour of becoming REVIEWED your new Chairman” CLLR ELAINE BEST IN THIS ISSUE Horsley Farmers Market Village Hall playground gets Plans for next year’s Village Horsleys Railway Task third Saturday each month a makeover Fête on 11 September Group “adopts” the Station AUTUMN 2020 HELLO FROM THE CONTACT DETAILS & CREDITS Parish Clerk and Responsible Financial Officer: Sam Pinder, West Horsley Parish Council, 95 The NEW CHAIRMAN Street, West Horsley, KT24 6DD 01483 901905, [email protected] Just when I thought I had “finally!” retired, I was paid the honour of being Editor: Vanessa Buosi, [email protected] elected as the new Chairman of the Parish Council in May Design and Artwork: The Creative Workshop, Having lived in West Horsley since 1994 and been and ruralness that is West Horsley. Thank 01580 212551, www.tcws.co.uk. a Parish Councillor since 2015, it is a privilege to you, Charles. We will have an opportunity to Print by: Simply Print Partners, 07768 228079, be able to serve the village I’m so proud to live celebrate your contribution once the COVID-19 www.simplyprintpartners.com. in. It was my horse that found West Horsley restrictions are lifted. I should also like to WHPC Photographer: Rex Butcher for me all those years ago …she was record appreciation to our Vice Chairman, stabled in Martyrs Green …I was living Mel Beynon, all the Councillors some All dates correct at time of going to press.
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey Heath Climate Change Study
    Addressing Climate Change through the Surrey Heath Local Plan A report to inform Local Plan preparation September 2020 Addressing Climate Change through the Surrey Heath Local Plan Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Eleanor King, Mark Fessey, Steve Smith, Steve Smith, Senior consultant Associate Director Technical Director Technical Director Rosie Cox, Consultant Jess Wood, Assistant Consultant Prepared for: Surrey Heath Borough Council Prepared by: AECOM Limited Aldgate Tower 2 Leman Street London E1 8FA United Kingdom aecom.com © 2020 AECOM UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) in accordance with its contract with Surrey Heath Borough Council (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles and the established budget. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. AECOM shall have no liability to any third party that makes use of or relies upon this document. AECOM Addressing Climate Change through the Surrey Heath Local Plan Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 Part 1: Mitigation ...................................................................................................................... 2 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]