DOCSLIB.ORG

Metrolinx Vegetation Guideline (2020)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Metrolinx Vegetation Guideline (2020) Metrolinx Vegetation Guideline (2020) Table of Contents Glossary of Terms .......................................................................................................... i Executive Summary .................................................................................................... vii 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1 2 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................... 2 3 VEGETATION COMPENSATION ............................................................................ 5 3.1 Potential Compensation Approach Options and Guidance Documents ............. 6 3.1.1 Initial Business Case for the Metrolinx Vegetation Policy ............................ 6 3.1.2 Ontario Power Generation Biodiversity Policy and Procurement Program .. 7 3.1.3 TRCA Ecosystem Compensation Protocol .................................................. 7 3.2 Implementation Framework for Vegetation Compensation ................................ 8 3.2.1 Determining Compensation Approach ....................................................... 11 3.2.1.1 Metrolinx Right-of-Way ........................................................................... 11 3.2.1.2 Public/Private Lands ............................................................................... 11 3.2.2 Determining Compensation Ratios ............................................................ 11 3.2.2.1 Baseline Compensation ......................................................................... 11 3.2.2.2 Bylaw Compensation .............................................................................. 11 3.2.2.3 Ecological Compensation ....................................................................... 12 3.2.2.4 Bylaw + Ecological Compensation ......................................................... 14 3.2.3 Implementing Compensation ..................................................................... 14 3.2.3.1 Compensation for Public Lands .............................................................. 15 3.2.3.2 Compensation for Private Lands ............................................................ 15 3.2.3.3 Compensation for Metrolinx Lands ......................................................... 15 3.2.4 Procurement for Ecological and Baseline Compensation .......................... 16 4 TREE END USE ..................................................................................................... 16 Metrolinx Vegetation Guideline (2020) 4.1 Potential Tree End Use Options and Guidance Documents ............................ 16 4.1.1 Initial Business Case for the Metrolinx Vegetation Policy .......................... 17 4.1.2 Toronto Directory of Urban Wood Products and Services ......................... 17 4.1.3 Ontario Municipalities ................................................................................ 18 4.2 Identifying Higher Value Trees ......................................................................... 18 4.3 End Use Options for Removed Trees .............................................................. 19 4.3.1 End Use Options for Higher Value Trees................................................... 21 4.3.2 End Use Options for Lower Value Trees and Other Tree Materials ........... 22 4.3.2.1 Chipping and Mulching ........................................................................... 22 4.3.2.2 Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) and Ash Trees .............................................. 23 4.3.2.3 Wood Residue Volume and Biomass ..................................................... 23 4.4 Tree End Use Partners .................................................................................... 24 4.5 Implementation Framework for Tree End Use .................................................. 24 4.5.1 Transportation and Storage Plans for Trees .............................................. 25 4.5.1.1 Equipment Requirements ....................................................................... 25 4.5.1.2 Storage Strategy .................................................................................... 26 4.5.1.3 Access Requirements ............................................................................ 28 4.5.1.4 Transportation ........................................................................................ 28 4.5.2 Distribution and Re-Use Plan for Trees ..................................................... 29 4.5.2.1 Higher Value Trees Distribution .............................................................. 29 4.5.2.2 Tree Distribution Logistics ...................................................................... 29 5 INTEGRATED VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ..................................................... 29 5.1 Potential IVM Approach Options and Guidance Documents ............................ 30 5.1.1 Initial Business Case for the Metrolinx Vegetation Policy .......................... 30 5.1.2 Other Relevant Guidelines for Integrated Vegetation Management .......... 30 Metrolinx Vegetation Guideline (2020) 5.2 Integrated Vegetation Management in a Rail Corridor ..................................... 31 5.2.1 IVM in an Electrified Corridor ..................................................................... 31 5.2.2 IVM in a Non-Electrified Corridor ............................................................... 32 5.3 Implementation Framework for Integrated Vegetation Management ................ 33 5.3.1 IVM Step No. 1: Understanding Pest and Ecosystem Dynamics in the Corridor ...................................................................................................... 34 5.3.1.1 Initial Inventory ....................................................................................... 34 5.3.1.2 Bi-Annual Monitoring – Pre-Treatment ................................................... 35 5.3.2 IVM Step No. 2: Setting Management Objectives and Tolerance Levels .. 36 5.3.2.1 Key Determinants of Treatment Thresholds in Rail Corridors ................ 37 5.3.2.2 Compatible and Incompatible Vegetation ............................................... 37 5.3.2.3 Integrated Vegetation Management Zones in Electrified Corridors ........ 40 5.3.2.4 Integrated Vegetation Management Zones in Non-Electrified Corridors 42 5.3.2.5 Incidental Observations and Ad-Hoc Treatments ................................... 44 5.3.2.6 Summary ................................................................................................ 44 5.3.3 IVM Step No. 3: Compiling Treatment Options .......................................... 45 5.3.3.1 Chemical Control Methods ..................................................................... 45 5.3.3.2 Mechanical and Manual Control Methods .............................................. 48 5.3.3.3 Cultural Control Methods ........................................................................ 48 5.3.3.4 The Mixed Method/Combined Approach ................................................ 49 5.3.3.5 Selection Criteria .................................................................................... 50 5.3.4 IVM Step No. 4: Site-Specific Implementation of Treatments .................... 54 5.3.4.1 Chemical Techniques and Application Technologies ............................. 54 5.3.4.2 Mechanical Techniques .......................................................................... 56 5.3.4.3 Cultural Techniques ............................................................................... 58 5.3.4.4 Selection Criteria and Best Practices ..................................................... 61 Metrolinx Vegetation Guideline (2020) 5.3.5 IVM Step No. 5: Adaptive Management and Monitoring ............................ 63 5.3.5.1 Bi-Annual Monitoring - Post-Treatment .................................................. 64 5.3.5.2 Adaptive Management ........................................................................... 65 5.3.5.3 Reporting ................................................................................................ 66 6 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................... 68 List of Tables Table E1: Compensation Approach Based on Tree Location ..................................................... vii Table 1: Compensation Approach Based on Tree Location ......................................................... 9 Table 2 Ecological Compensation Ratios Based on Basal Area ................................................ 12 Table 3: Ecological Compensation Costing ................................................................................ 13 Table 4: Ecological Compensation Ratios based on Individual Tree Size .................................. 14 Table 5: High, Medium and Low Value Tree Species (Hilts and Mitchell, 2009) ........................ 18 Table 6: Integrated Vegetation Management Zones and Treatment Thresholds for Electrified Corridors ..................................................................................................................................... 41 Table 7: Integrated Vegetation Management Zones and Treatment Thresholds for Non-Electrified Corridors ..................................................................................................................................... 43 Table 8: Herbicide Selection ....................................................................................................... 46 Table 9:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ontario Power Generation: Application to Renew the Licence to Prepare Site for the Darlington New Nuclear Project (DNNP)
    Ontario Power Generation: Application to Renew the Licence to Prepare Site for the Darlington New Nuclear Project (DNNP) CNSC Staff Presentation Commission Hearing June 10-11, 2021 CMD 21-H4.A e-Doc 6522189 (PPTX) nuclearsafety.gc.ca e-Doc 6569476 (PDF) Ontario Power Generation: Darlington New Nuclear Project Licence Renewal June 10-11, 2021, CMD 21-H4 Presentation Outline • Project Location and History • Assessment of Renewal Application • OPG’s Performance • Other Matters of Regulatory Interest • Proposed Licence • Conclusions • Recommendations 2 nuclearsafety.gc.ca Ontario Power Generation: Darlington New Nuclear Project Licence Renewal June 10-11, 2021, CMD 21-H4 Purpose of Hearing Ontario Power Generation (OPG) is requesting that the Commission: • Renew the DNNP licence to prepare site for a period of 10 years from the date of issuance CNSC staff recommend that the Commission: • Renew the proposed licence, PRSL 18.00/2031 • Authorize delegation of authority as set out in CMD 21-H4 nuclearsafety.gc.ca 3 Ontario Power Generation: Darlington New Nuclear Project Licence Renewal June 10-11, 2021, CMD 21-H4 PROJECT LOCATION AND HISTORY nuclearsafety.gc.ca 4 Ontario Power Generation: Darlington New Nuclear Project Licence Renewal June 10-11, 2021, CMD 21-H4 Existing Darlington Nuclear Generating Station Site Darlington New Nuclear Project (DNNP) Site nuclearsafety.gc.ca 5 Ontario Power Generation: Darlington New Nuclear Project Licence Renewal June 10-11, 2021, CMD 21-H4 CNSC Licence under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act (NSCA) The NSCA
    [Show full text]
  • “They Demanded — Under Duress — That We Stop Supporting Belinda ​[​Karahalios​]. We Are Appalled at This Bullying An
    Queen’s Park Today – Daily Report August 20, 2020 Quotation of the day “They demanded — under duress — that we stop supporting Belinda [Karahalios]. We are appalled at this bullying and abuse ​ ​ ​ of power. It is a direct attack on our democracy!” The now-derecognized PC riding association in Cambridge sends out flyers attacking Premier Doug Ford and the PC Party over alleged "intimidation tactics." ​ Today at Queen’s Park Written by Sabrina Nanji On the schedule The house reconvenes on Monday, September 14. The roster for the Select Committee on Emergency Management Oversight — which will scrutinize ongoing extensions of emergency orders via Bill 195 — has been named. The ​ ​ majority-enjoying PC side will feature Bob Bailey, Christine Hogarth, Daryl Kramp, Robin ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Martin, Sam Oosterhoff, Lindsey Park and Effie Triantafilopoulos. The New Democrat ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ members are Gilles Bisson, Sara Singh and Tom Rakocevic; Liberal MPP John Fraser will ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ take up the Independent spot. The committee was struck as an accountability measure because the PCs empowered themselves to amend or extend the emergency orders for up to the next two years, without requiring a vote or debate in the legislature. Bill 195, the enabling law, also requires the premier ​ ​ or a designate of his choosing to appear at the special committee to justify any changes to the sweeping emergency orders. Premier watch An RFP for the next leg of the Eglinton Crosstown tunnelling project will be issued today. Premier Doug Ford announced the move in Mississauga Tuesday alongside cabinet’s ​ ​ transportation overseers Caroline Mulroney and Kinga Surma. ​ ​ ​ ​ Three construction consortiums have already been shortlisted and are now able to present their detailed costing plans to Infrastructure Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Tree Health and Species in the Gentrifying Neighbourhood of the Junction Triangle in Toronto, Ontario
    ASSESSING TREE HEALTH AND SPECIES IN THE GENTRIFYING NEIGHBOURHOOD OF THE JUNCTION TRIANGLE IN TORONTO, ONTARIO By Ritam Sen Bachelor of Arts, Ryerson University, 2014 A thesis presented to Ryerson University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science in the Program of Environmental Applied Science and Management Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2018 ©Ritam Sen, 2018 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revision, as accepted by my examiners. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this thesis to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this thesis by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Assessing Tree Health and Species in the Gentrifying Neighbourhood of the Junction Triangle in Toronto, Ontario Ritam Sen Master of Applied Science, 2018 Environmental Applied Science and Management Ryerson University Abstract: The purpose of this study is to examine the number, health, and species of trees in the gentrifying neighbourhood of the Junction Triangle. In this research, the tree inventory and questionnaire method were used. The questionnaire results show that respondents who moved in prior to 2007 view gentrification more negatively than residents who moved in after. The study found that there is a net growth of trees in the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, June 5 Update
    5/26/2021 Friday June 5 Update Subscribe Past Issues Translate Click here to view this email in your browser. Friday June 5 COVID-19 Update Dear neighbour, Toronto demonstrated its incredible solidarity this weekend as thousands marched with the family of Regis Korchinski-Paquet to demand answers and accountability for her death. Thank you to everyone who has also reached out to me and my office. I hear your grief, your anger and your demands for action. I fully endorse the letter sent by my colleagues, MPP Bhutila Karpoche and MPP Laura Mae Lindo to the Solicitor General, demanding a full, independent and urgent investigation into Regis' death. I was dismayed this week when Premier Ford tried to claim that Canada doesn't have 'deep roots' of systemic racism. Thank you to my colleague MPP Jill Andrews for responding powerfully in the legislature to Ford’s harmful comment. Our work must include making systemic change to end anti-Black racism in our institutions, including in policing. I pledge to be a part of this work. Please contact my office if you have questions or concerns, if you have petitions you want me to read out at Queen’s Park, or if you want to organize with us so we can use this pandemic to build a new normal. Yours, Jessica Bell (MPP for University-Rosedale) In this newsletter: https://mailchi.mp/ndp/update-from-mpp-bell-on-covid-19-coronavirus-12540509 1/10 5/26/2021 Friday June 5 Update Speaking out against Bill 184, and for tenants' rights Subscribe Past Issues Translate Anti-Black racism is a public health crisis Expanded
    [Show full text]
  • Pickering Nuclear 2017 Impingement Monitoring Report
    Internal Use Only Document Number: Usage Classification: Report P-REP-07263-00011 N/A Sheet Number: Revision Number: Page: N/A R000 1 of 17 Title: PICKERING NUCLEAR 2017 IMPINGEMENT MONITORING REPORT © Ontario Power Generation Inc., 2018. This document has been produced and distributed for Ontario Power Generation Inc. purposes only. No part of this document may be reproduced, published, converted, or stored in any data retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise) without the prior written permission of Ontario Power Generation Inc. Pickering Nuclear 2017 Impingement Monitoring Report P-REP-07263-00011-R000 2018-04-16 Order Number: N/A Other Reference Number: Internal Use Only Prepared By: Jeff Wright Prepared By: Doug Brown Environmental Advisor Environmental Advisor Environment Programs Environment Programs Reviewed By: Concurred By: Vanessa Tang Hon Yue Ali Esmaeily Section Manager Section Manager Environment Ops Support Environment Programs Pickering Approved By: Raphael McCalla Director Environment Ops Support Nuclear N-TMP-10010-R012 (Microsoft® 2007) Internal Use Only Document Number: Usage Classification: Report P-REP-07263-00011 N/A Sheet Number: Revision Number: Page: N/A R000 2 of 17 Title: PICKERING NUCLEAR 2017 IMPINGEMENT MONITORING REPORT Table of Contents Page List of Tables and Figures ............................................................................................................. 3 Revision Summary .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Liberty
    2013 ACCESS AND PRIVACY Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner Ontario, Canada FREEDOM & LIBERTY 2013 STATISTICS In free and open societies, governments must be accessible and transparent to their citizens. TABLE OF CONTENTS Requests by the Public ...................................... 1 Provincial Compliance ..................................... 3 Municipal Compliance ................................... 12 Appeals .............................................................. 26 Privacy Complaints .......................................... 38 Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA) .................................. 41 As I look back on the past years of the IPC, I feel that Ontarians can be assured that this office has grown into a first-class agency, known around the world for demonstrating innovation and leadership, in the fields of both access and privacy. STATISTICS 4 1 REQUESTS BY THE PUBLIC UNDER FIPPA/MFIPPA There were 55,760 freedom of information (FOI) requests filed across Ontario in 2013, nearly a 6% increase over 2012 where 52,831 were filed TOTAL FOI REQUESTS FILED BY JURISDICTION AND RECORDS TYPE Personal Information General Records Total Municipal 16,995 17,334 34,329 Provincial 7,029 14,402 21,431 Total 24,024 31,736 55,760 TOTAL FOI REQUESTS COMPLETED BY JURISDICTION AND RECORDS TYPE Personal Information General Records Total Municipal 16,726 17,304 34,030 Provincial 6,825 13,996 20,821 Total 23,551 31,300 54,851 TOTAL FOI REQUESTS COMPLETED BY SOURCE AND JURISDICTION Municipal Provincial Total
    [Show full text]
  • Tvontario (Tee-Vee-On-Táre-Ee-Oh) N
    TVOntario (tee-vee-on-táre-ee-oh) n. adjunct to Ontario’s formal education and training systems, on air, online and in print. adj. intelligent; accessible; educational; inspirational. v. increasing self-sufficiency; delivering uncompromising quality. Members make it happen! Annual Report Card 2003–2004 To the Honourable Mary Anne Chambers, Minister of Training, Colleges and Universities, Mandate Queen’s Park I take pleasure in submitting the Annual Report of the Ontario Educational Communications Authority (TVOntario) for the fiscal year April 1, 2003, to March 31, 2004. This is done in accordance with Section 12 (1) of the Ontario Educational Communications Authority Act. TVOntario’s mandate is to serve as an adjunct to the formal education and training This Annual Report outlines the milestones we set and our successes in achieving them for the year systems in Ontario, by using television and 2003–04, during which we delivered to the people of Ontario unique services that support the other communications technologies to Government’s top priority of education, and at the same time increased our financial self- provide high quality educational programs, sufficiency. curriculum resources and distance education courses in English and in French. Through the integration of our broadcast and online technologies, and the commitment and vision of a talented staff, TVOntario provides valuable educational resources and learning experiences In 1970, TVOntario was established as the that fulfill the needs of Ontarians. With our focus on formal educational programming and Ontario Educational Communications resources, diversity, innovation, and self-sufficiency at the core of our day-to-day operations, there Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 ONTARIO Budget for General Inquiries Regarding 2018 Ontario Budget: Budget Papers, Please Call
    2018 ONTARIO BUDGE 2018 ONTARIO A PLAN FOR CARE AND OPPORTUNITY RX C. Lee RX T THE HONOURABLE CHARLES SOUSA MINISTER OF FINANCE 2018 ONTARIO BUDGET BUDGET PAPERS For general inquiries regarding 2018 Ontario Budget: Budget Papers, please call: Toll-free English and French inquiries: 1-800-337-7222 Teletypewriter (TTY): 1-800-263-7776 For electronic copies of this document, visit our website at www.ontario.ca/budget A printed copy of this publication can be ordered: Online: www.serviceontario.ca/publications By phone: ServiceOntario Contact Centre (Monday to Friday, 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM) Telephone: 416-326-5300 TTY: 416-325-3408 Toll-free across Canada: 1-800-668-9938 TTY Toll-free across Ontario: 1-800-268-7095 © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2018 ISBN 978-1-4868-1883-9 (Print) ISBN 978-1-4868-1884-6 (HTML) ISBN 978-1-4868-1885-3 (PDF) Ce document est disponible en français sous le titre : Budget de l’Ontario 2018 – Documents budgétaires Foreword A Plan for Care and Opportunity Ontario’s economy is performing well. This is largely due to the businesses and entrepreneurs who create jobs and to the women and men who get up each morning to go to the plant, or the office, or another place of work to make Ontario a more prosperous province. At the same time, the government has made strategic investments to support growth. Enhanced education, skills and training, new infrastructure, a competitive business environment and support for startups and small businesses are helping create good jobs. On the surface, the numbers tell a positive story: Our economy has outperformed those of all G7 nations since 2014; Our unemployment rate, at 5.5 per cent, is the lowest it has been in almost 20 years; and Last year alone, 500 net new jobs were created, on average, each day in Ontario, and they were mostly full‐time.
    [Show full text]
  • West Toronto Railpath Environmental Stewardship Plan
    West Toronto Railpath Environmental Stewardship Plan Milkweed plant at Ruskin Avenue Date of Last Revision: August 27, 2017 2 1 Introduction 1.1 The Railpath and the Friends The West Toronto Railpath (the “Railpath”) is a linear park located in the west end of Toronto, in the Junction Triangle neighbourhood. The Railpath is both a human-powered multi-use recreational path and a biologically beneficial nature corridor. Railpath supports many animal and insect species and is part of bio-diverse eco-system. Most of the Railpath is owned by the City of Toronto, and some of it is leased to the City by Canadian Pacific Railway. The West Toronto Railpath became a city park in 2009, and is maintained by the City of Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The Friends of the West Toronto Railpath (the “Friends”) is a community-based group that was founded in 2001 when members of the Roncesvalles Macdonell Residents’ Association (RMRA), got together, formed a partnership with the Community Bicycle Network and Evergreen to advocate for the creation of WTR. The Friends are dedicated to the maintenance, expansion, and improvement of the Railpath. Our vision is for the Railpath to be a community connector, an ecological asset, a meeting place for the neighbourhood, and a resource for the whole city. 1.2 History of the Railpath Planting The Railpath is located on land that was once a CP railway spur line serving industries in the west end of Toronto (see photo below). The land was purchased in 2003 by the City of Toronto. Old Bruce service track, looking south from Wallace Wallace Ave Looking North, October, 2009 Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear in Canada NUCLEAR ENERGY a KEY PART of CANADA’S CLEAN and LOW-CARBON ENERGY MIX Uranium Mining & Milling
    Nuclear in Canada NUCLEAR ENERGY A KEY PART OF CANADA’S CLEAN AND LOW-CARBON ENERGY MIX Uranium Mining & Milling . Nuclear electricity in Canada displaces over 50 million tonnes of GHG emissions annually. Electricity from Canadian uranium offsets more than 300 million tonnes of GHG emissions worldwide. Uranium Processing – Re ning, Conversion, and Fuel Fabrication Yellowcake is re ned at Blind River, Ontario, PELLETS to produce uranium trioxide. At Port Hope, Ontario, Nuclear Power Generation and Nuclear Science & uranium trioxide is At plants in southern Technology TUBES converted. URANIUM DIOXIDE Ontario, fuel pellets are UO2 is used to fuel CANDU loaded into tubes and U O UO URANIUM Waste Management & Long-term Management 3 8 3 nuclear reactors. assembled into fuel YUKON TRIOXIDE UO2 Port Radium YELLOWCAKE REFINING URANIUM bundles for FUEL BUNDLE Shutdown or Decommissioned Sites TRIOXIDE UF is exported for 6 CANDU reactors. UO enrichment and use Rayrock NUNAVUT 3 CONVERSION UF Inactive or Decommissioned Uranium Mines and 6 in foreign light water NORTHWEST TERRITORIES Tailings Sites URANIUM HEXAFLUORIDE reactors. 25 cents 400 kg of COAL Beaverlodge, 2.6 barrels of OIL Gunnar, Lorado NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR McClean Lake = 3 Cluff Lake FUEL PELLET Rabbit Lake of the world’s 350 m of GAS BRITISH COLUMBIA Cigar Lake 20% McArthur River production of uranium is NVERSION Key Lake QUEBEC CO mined and milled in northern FU EL ALBERTA SASKATCHEWAN MANITOBA F Saskatchewan. AB G R University of IN IC ONTARIO P.E.I. IN A Saskatchewan The uranium mining F T E IO 19 CANDU reactors at Saskatchewan industry is the largest R N TRIUMF NEW BRUNSWICK Research Council NOVA SCOTIA private employer of Gentilly-1 & -2 Whiteshell Point Lepreau 4 nuclear power generating stations Rophton NPD Laboratories Indigenous people in CANDU REACTOR Chalk River Laboratories Saskatchewan.
    [Show full text]
  • ON COVID-19 Policy Response Monitor
    North American COVID-19 Policy Response Monitor: Ontario June 19, 2020 What is the North American COVID-19 Policy Response Monitor? The North American COVID-19 policy monitor has been designed to collect and organize up-to-date information on how jurisdictions are responding to the crisis. It summarizes responses of health systems as well as wider public health initiatives. The North American policy monitor is an offshoot of the international COVID-19 Health System Response Monitor (HSRM), a joint undertaking of the WHO Regional Office for Europe, the European Commission and the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Canadian content to HSRM is contributed by the North American Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (NAO). Contents 1. Preventing transmission ........................................................................................................................... 2 2. Ensuring sufficient physical infrastructure and workforce capacity ......................................................... 8 3. Providing health services effectively....................................................................................................... 12 4. Paying for services .................................................................................................................................. 12 5. Governance ............................................................................................................................................. 18 6. Measures in other sectors .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Repurposing Pickering Preliminary Assessment Report
    Repurposing Pickering Exploring the possibilities for new uses and reuses on the Pickering Nuclear site December 11, 2015 This report is made available for information purposes only. The content of this report is based on available facts, the analysis undertaken and assumptions made (the "Content"), as of the date of this report (11/12/2015). The Content may change, subsequent to the date of this report, and these changes may have an impact on the assessment results. Please note that OPG may or may not choose to either update this report or post an updated report. OPG cannot guarantee the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of this report or its usefulness for any purpose. OPG will not be liable for any loss, damage cost or expense arising or incurred as a result of any person's use or reliance on this report. 2 Executive Summary As part of planning for the end of commercial operations of the Pickering Nuclear Generating Station, Ontario Power Generation (OPG) is undertaking a study to explore future uses of the Pickering site. The reason for this is to ensure that the site will continue to be put to productive uses that benefit Ontarians during and after the decommissioning of the Pickering station. Given the transmission (hydro) corridor and other valuable infrastructure that already are in place, through Repurposing Pickering, OPG aims to identify and implement land uses that take advantage of existing assets – without interfering with decommissioning and without preventing the site’s long-term potential from being realized. As a starting point for Repurposing Pickering, the purpose of this first comprehensive study is to explore future possibilities broadly – and then narrow down and recommend a manageable number of land use options for further study.
    [Show full text]