DOCSLIB.ORG

Obrambnogeografsko Vrednotenje Spodnjega Dela Ljubljanske Kotline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Obrambnogeografsko Vrednotenje Spodnjega Dela Ljubljanske Kotline UNIVERZA V LJUBLJANI FAKULTETA ZA DRUŽBENE VEDE Katja Berčič Mentor: red. prof. dr. Jurij Kunaver Somentor: as. dr. Zvonimir Bratun Lektor: univ. dipl. slav. Simona Zupanc OBRAMBNOGEOGRAFSKO VREDNOTENJE SPODNJEGA DELA LJUBLJANSKE KOTLINE Diplomsko delo Ljubljana, september 2003 KAZALO A. VSEBINSKO KAZALO I. UVOD ..................................................................................................................1 II. METODOLOŠKO-HIPOTETIČNI OKVIR .....................................................2 1. OPREDELITEV PREDMETA ..................................................................................2 2. OPREDELITEV CILJA ............................................................................................2 3. HIPOTEZE ................................................................................................................2 4. METODOLOŠKI OKVIR .........................................................................................3 5. POSEBNOSTI IN OMEJITVE .................................................................................3 6. ZGRADBA DIPLOMSKEGA DELA .......................................................................5 7. OPREDELITEV TEMELJNIH POJMOV ................................................................5 7.1. Geografski prostor ..............................................................................................5 7.2. Zemljišče ............................................................................................................6 7.3. Relief ..................................................................................................................6 7.4. Geografske ovire in pregrade .............................................................................6 7.5. Bojno delovanje ..................................................................................................7 7.6. Smer delovanja ...................................................................................................7 7.7. Manever ..............................................................................................................7 7.8. Baza ali temeljišče za bojna delovanja ...............................................................7 7.9. Bojišče ................................................................................................................8 7.10. Vojaškogeografsko težišče in objekt ................................................................8 7.11. Prehodnost, tankovska prehodnost ...................................................................8 7.12. Prometna smer ..................................................................................................9 7.13. Razodnost .........................................................................................................9 7.14. Osamelec ..........................................................................................................9 7.15. Regionalizacija .................................................................................................9 III. VSEBINA ..........................................................................................................10 1. SPLOŠNI GEOGRAFSKI DEJAVNIKI SPODNJEGA DELA LJUBLJANSKE KOTLINE ...............................................................................................................10 1.1. Poimenovanje območja .......................................................................................10 1.2. Omejitve in geografski položaj območja ............................................................10 1.3. Meje proučevanega območja...............................................................................12 1.3.1. Naravno geografske meje ............................................................................12 1.3.2. Družbeno geografske meje...........................................................................13 1.4. Oblika in velikost spodnjega dela Ljubljanske kotline .......................................13 2. OPREDELITEV FIZIČNOGEOGRAFSKIH DEJAVNIKOV SPODNJEGA DELA LJUBLJANSKE KOTLINE.....................................................................................13 2.1.Geološke značilnosti ............................................................................................13 2.1.1. Splošne geološke značilnosti........................................................................13 2.1.1.1. Ljubljansko polje ............................................................................................. 14 2.1.1.2. Ljubljansko barje ............................................................................................. 15 2.1.2. Tektonski prelomi........................................................................................15 2.1.3. Geološka zgradba in razprostranjenost kamnin in učinki na obrambno- geografske značilnosti .................................................................................17 2.1.3.1. Predkvartarne plasti ........................................................................................ 17 2.1.3.2. Kvartarne plasti ............................................................................................... 17 2.1.4. Ocena posledic potresa na območju Ljubljane..............................................20 2.1.4.1. Opis pričakovanih potresnih učinkov ............................................................. 21 2.2. Reliefne značilnosti.............................................................................................23 2.2.1. Tipi reliefa...................................................................................................25 2.2.2. Vertikalna členitev reliefa............................................................................25 2.2.3. Reliefne oblike ............................................................................................25 2.2.4. Naklonski razredi.........................................................................................26 2.2.5. Ekspozicije ..................................................................................................27 2.2.6. Sklep ...........................................................................................................28 2.3. Podnebne in vremenske značilnosti ....................................................................28 2.3.1. Temperature...................................................................................................29 2.3.2. Padavine ........................................................................................................31 2.3.3. Oblačnost in megla ........................................................................................32 2.3.4. Veter..............................................................................................................33 2.3.5. Vojaškoobrambni pomen vremenskih razmer .................................................34 2.3.6. Sklep..............................................................................................................36 2.4. Hidrografske značilnosti .....................................................................................37 2.4.1. Poplave..........................................................................................................39 2.4.2. Podtalnica ......................................................................................................40 2.4.3. Obrambnogeografski učinek vodotokov .........................................................42 2.4.4. Sklep..............................................................................................................44 2.5. Prsti......................................................................................................................45 2.5.1. Splošne pedološke značilnosti ........................................................................45 2.5.2. Vojaškoobrambna vrednost tal .......................................................................45 2.6. Obrambnogeografski učinki rastja ......................................................................50 2.6.1. Značilnosti vegetacije.....................................................................................50 2.6.2. Učinki na prehodnost .....................................................................................51 2.6.3. Sklep..............................................................................................................55 2.7. Tankovska prehodnost.........................................................................................55 2.7.1. Urbane površine.............................................................................................57 2.7.2. Sklep..............................................................................................................57 3. OPREDELITEV DRUŽBENOGEOGRAFSKIH DEJAVNIKOV SPODNJEGA DELA LJUBLJANSKE KOTLINE .........................................................................60 3.1. Demografski dejavnik .........................................................................................60 3.1.1. Obrambnogeografski pomen prebivalstva.......................................................60 3.1.2. Obrambnogeografski pomen naselij ...............................................................62 3.1.2.1. Funkcijska zgradba Ljubljane.......................................................................... 62 3.2. Kulturna dediščina in njeno varovanje pred vojnim delovanjem........................65 3.3. Kmetijske značilnosti ..........................................................................................66
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kamna Gorica - Dolnice
    NAROČNIK: Factor nepremičnine d.0.0. POROČILO O PREDHODNIH ARHEOLOŠKIH RAZISKAVAH NA LOKACIJI KAMNA GORICA - DOLNICE (EŠD 10671) (12.7. 2012) KULTURNOVARSTVENO SOGLASJE ŠT.: MK RS 62240-75/2012/2 IZDELALI: Samo Hvalec Iris Bekljanov Zidanšek Petra Vojaković Dr. Tomaž Verbič Ljubljana 2012 ©Arhej d.o.o. NAROČNIK: Factor nepremičnine d.o.o., Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana IZVAJALEC: Arhej d.o.o., Drožanjska 23, 8290 Sevnica ODGOVORNI VODJA DEL: mag. Matjaž Novšak, univ.dipl.arheol. SODELAVCI: Samo Hvalec, univ.dipl.arheol. David Badovinac, absolv. Arheol. STROKOVNI NADZOR: Boris Vičič, univ. dipl. arheol., konservatorski svetovalec; Zavod za varstvo kulturne dediščine Slovenije, OE Ljubljana, Tržaška 4, 1000 Ljubljana ©Arhej d.o.o. KAZALO 1. UVOD ................................................................................................................................ 2 2. GEOLOŠKI ORIS PROSTORA....................................................................................... 4 3. ZGODOVINSKI ORIS PROSTORA ............................................................................... 8 4. OPIS OBMOČJA IN DELOVNI POGOJI ....................................................................... 10 5. INTENZIVNI PODPOVRŠINSKI TERENSKI PREGLED ........................................... 11 6. STROJNE TESTNE SONDE ............................................................................................ 16 SKLEP ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 25Th Alzheimer Europe Conference Dementia: Putting Strategies and Research Into Practice Ljubljana, Slovenia ˝/ 2-4 September 2015
    25th Alzheimer Europe Conference Dementia: putting strategies and research into practice Ljubljana, Slovenia ˝/ 2-4 September 2015 Abstract Book Index Plenary Sessions 1 Special Symposia 7 Parallel Sessions 10 Slovenian Sessions 45 Posters 50 Index of authors 99 The 25th AE Conference in Ljubljana received funding under an operating grant from the European Union’s Health Programme (2014-2020) The content of the 25th Alzheimer Europe conference represents the views of the author only and is his/her sole responsibility; it cannot be considered to reflect the views of the European Commission and/or the Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency or any other body of the European Union. The European Commission and the Agency do not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains. Dementia: putting strategies and research into practice / Ljubljana 2015 Abstract Book / Plenary Sessions Plenary Sessions is not easy for the entourage. Many studies show the advantages of an early diagnosis for the patient: relief to understand what is PL1.1. New medicines for Alzheimer’s disease: Lessons from going on, proper care, and appropriate attitude of the close relatives, past failures and perspectives for the future increased empowerment… And now, innovative therapies are tested WINBLAD Bengt in people at risk for developing Alzheimer’s disease because of the presence of lesions associated with this disease in their brain, before In 2010, the number of people affected by dementia worldwide any symptoms. Surveys have shown that most people say they want was estimated to 36 million, with an estimated cost of approx 600 to know if they will develop Alzheimer’s disease, but much less will bUSD.
    [Show full text]
  • PROLINE-CE Word Template
    PROLINE-CE WORKPACKAGE T2, ACTIVITY T2.1 SET UP OF PILOT SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT PRACTICES D.T2.1.4 DESCRIPTIVE DOCUMENTATION OF PILOT ACTIONS AND RELATED ISSUES PILOT ACTION PAC2.1: WELL FIELD DRAVLJE VALLEY IN LJUBLJANA September, 2017 Lead Institution University of Ljubljana Contributor/s “PP4, PP5” Lead Author/s Barbara Čenčur Curk, Jerca Praprotnik Kastelic, Ajda Cilenšek Date last release Sep 2017 Contributors, name and surname Institution Barbara Čenčur Curk University of Ljubljana, NTF Jerca Praprotnik Kastelic University of Ljubljana, NTF Primož Banovec University of Ljubljana, FGG Ajda Cilenšek University of Ljubljana, FGG Matej Cerk University of Ljubljana, FGG Branka Bračič Železnik Public Water Utility JP VO-KA 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Basic data about pilot action .................................................................................................................................. 3 2.1. Geographical description ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2. Geological description ............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.3. Pedology .................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 7Th Danube Academies Conference
    SLOVENSKA AKADEMIJA ZNANOSTI IN UMETNOSTI 7th DANUBE ACADEMIES CONFERENCE LJUBLJANA 2017 7th DANUBE ACADEMIES CONFERENCE (DAC) 12–13 May, 2016, Ljubljana Conference proceedings Organized by: European Academy of Sciences and Arts Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts Under the auspices of the President of the Republic of Slovenia, Mr. Borut Pahor and under the high patronage of the European Parliament SPrEjEto NA 80. SEjI IzvršILNEgA oDBorA, 16. MAjA 2016. Glavni urednik / Chief editor: Andrej Kranjc Uredniški odbor / Editorial board: tadej Bajd, Uroš Skalerič, jože Krašovec Priprava / Preparation:Darja rogelj Tisk in oblikovanje / Printing and design: Designpro, d. o. o. Število izvodov / Copies: 300 Izdala / Published: Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts © Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Ljubljana CIP - Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 556(4)(082) 502.131.1(4)(082) DANUBE Academies Conference (7 ; 2016 ; Ljubljana) Conference proceedings / 7th Danube Academies Conference - DAC, May 12th -13th, 2016 Ljubljana ; organized by European Academy of Sciences and Arts [and] Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts ; [glavni urednik Andrej Kranjc]. - Ljubljana : Slovenska akademija znanosti in umetnosti, 2017 ISBN 978-961-268-050-3 1. Kranjc, Andrej, 1943- 2. European Academy of Sciences 3. Arts Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts 290219776 7th DANUBE ACADEMIES CONFERENCE (DAC) Ljubljana 12–13 May, 2016 Conference proceedings Ljubljana, 2017 ConTenTS opening Address of the Conference Tadej Bajd ...................................................................................... 7 Limited resources at Unlimited Capabilities – New Ideas, Processes & Materials Will Allow a good and Can Provide a Brilliant Future Henning Zoz ................................................................................... 10 Higher Education Institutions and SME: translation of Knowledge to the Market Dejan Popović ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Slovenia
    TOWN Small and medium sized towns in their functional territorial context Applied Research 2013/1/23 Case Study Report | Slovenia Version 05/09/2013 ESPON 2013 1 This report presents the interim results of an Applied Research Project conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2013 Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The partnership behind the ESPON Programme consists of the EU Commission and the Member States of the EU27, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. Each partner is represented in the ESPON Monitoring Committee. This report does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the Monitoring Committee. Information on the ESPON Programme and projects can be found on www.espon.eu The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This basic report exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON & University of Leuven, 2013. Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON Coordination Unit in Luxembourg. List of authors Nataša Pichler-Milanović, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia Samo Drobne, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia Miha Konjar, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia © Institute UL-FGG d.o.o, Jamova 2, SI-1001 Ljubljana, Slovenia ESPON 2013 i Table of contents
    [Show full text]
  • Ekološka in Naravovarstvena Analiza Ptic Gnezdilk Ob Reki Savi Med Hrastjem in Litijo
    UNIVERZA V LJUBLJANI BIOTEHNIŠKA FAKULTETA ODDELEK ZA BIOLOGIJO Petra MOHAR EKOLOŠKA IN NARAVOVARSTVENA ANALIZA PTIC GNEZDILK OB REKI SAVI MED HRASTJEM IN LITIJO DIPLOMSKO DELO Ljubljana, 2005 UNIVERZA V LJUBLJANI BIOTEHNIŠKA FAKULTETA ODDELEK ZA BIOLOGIJO Petra MOHAR EKOLOŠKA IN NARAVOVARSTVENA ANALIZA PTIC GNEZDILK OB REKI SAVI MED HRASTJEM IN LITIJO DIPLOMSKO DELO ECOLOGICAL AND NATURE CONSERVATION ANALYSIS OF NESTING BIRDS ALONG THE RIVER SAVA BETWEEN HRASTJE AND LITIJA GRADUATION THESIS Ljubljana, 2005 Mohar, P.: Ekološka in naravovarstvena analiza ptic gnezdilk ob reki Savi med Hrastjem in Litijo. II Ljubljana, Univ. v Ljubljani, Biotehniška fakulteta, Odd. za biologijo, 2005 Diplomsko delo je zaključek Univerzitetnega študija biologije. Opravljeno je bilo na Oddelku za biologijo Biotehniške fakultete Univerze v Ljubljani. Študijska komisija Oddelka za biologijo je za mentorja diplomskega dela imenovala doc. dr. Petra Trontlja. Komisija za oceno in zagovor: Predsednik: doc. dr. Ivan Kos Univerza v Ljubljani, Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za biologijo Član: doc. dr. Peter Trontelj Univerza v Ljubljani, Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za biologijo Član: prof. dr. Mihael J. Toman Univerza v Ljubljani, Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za biologijo Datum zagovora: 26.09.2005 Naloga je rezultat lastnega raziskovalnega dela. Petra Mohar Mohar, P.: Ekološka in naravovarstvena analiza ptic gnezdilk ob reki Savi med Hrastjem in Litijo. III Ljubljana, Univ. v Ljubljani, Biotehniška fakulteta, Odd. za biologijo, 2005 KLJUČNA DOKUMENTACIJSKA INFORMACIJA
    [Show full text]
  • App. E1.1 - the Earthquake of 25 May 1448 in Catalonia
    "A Basic European Earthquake Catalogue and a Database for the evaluation of long-term seismicity and seismic hazard" (BEECD) App. E1.1 - The earthquake of 25 May 1448 in Catalonia study by Salicrú i Lluch R., 1995. The 1448 earthquake in Catalonia. Some effects and local reactions. Annali di Geofisica, 38, pp. 503-513 short comment by V. Castelli For this earthquake the BEECD WF contains the following entry, coming from the input PEC MEM83. The root is to be considered "hidden" among the references supplied by this PEC. Ds Ye Mo Da Ho Mi Ax R Rc Nmo Ix Io Lat Lon Mm MEM83 1448 05 24 01 30 CARDEDEU.B HID 3C - 0 80 41.633 02.333 - This earthquake has been recently studied by Salicrú i Lluch (1995). Brief analysis of the sources used by the study The study starts from a summary of the available dataset, collected by the leading Catalan seismological compilation (Fontserè and Iglésies, 1971) and consisting of "several contemporary chronistic and narrative sources from Barcelona [...] Perpinyà [...] Vic [...] and Girona [...]". The study then goes on to improve this reasonably good, but uneven dataset by adding new, unpublished contemporary sources and giving a new interpretation of a document already known to Fontserè and Iglésies (1971), which connected it to an earthquake occurred in September 1450. The study shows that it was written on July 1450 and could therefore be related to the previous event. The new data come from the episcopal archives of Barcelona and the central archives of the Aragonese kingdom (ACA, 1453; Acords, 1424-1451; ADV, 1450; Dietari, 1411-1458; ADB, 1448-1453; Jornades, 1411-1484; Revista, 1881).
    [Show full text]
  • Poti Znanosti K Edinosti Slovencev
    POTI ZNANOSTI K EDINOSTI SLOVENCEV 4. konferenca slovenskih znanstvenikov in gospodarstvenikov iz sveta in Slovenije Brdo pri Kranju, 8. in 9. september 2005 ZBORNIK 4. KONFERENCA SLOVENSKIH ZNANSTVENIKOV IN GOSPODARSTVENIKOV IZ SVETA IN SLOVENIJE IZ SVETA IN GOSPODARSTVENIKOV ZNANSTVENIKOV SLOVENSKIH 4. KONFERENCA Ljubljana 2005 B5 sladkanjeB5 sladkanje29/8/05 16:13 29/8/05 Page 16:13 1 Page 1 C M Y CCM MMY YCY CMCMYMYK CY CMY K +386 1 58 23 400+386 804 1 36 12 +386 (sales department) 319 1 3613 +386 1 58 23 400+386 804 1 36 12 +386 (sales department) 319 1 3613 +386 tel: fax: [email protected] e-mail: tel: http: //www.goricane.si fax: [email protected] e-mail: http: //www.goricane.si Goričane, tovarna papirja Medvode, d.d. Medvode, papirja tovarna Goričane, Mill Paper Goričane Medvode, Slovenia Ladja 1215 10, d.d. Medvode, papirja tovarna Goričane, Mill Paper Goričane Medvode, Slovenia Ladja 1215 10, POTI ZNANOSTI K EDINOSTI SLOVENCEV 4. konferenca slovenskih znanstvenikov in gospodarstvenikov iz sveta in Slovenije Brdo pri Kranju, 8. in 9. september 2005 ZBORNIK Ljubljana 2005 Izdajatelj in založnik: SVETOVNI SLOVENSKI KONGRES SLOVENIAN WORLD CONGRESS Cankarjeva cesta 1/IV, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenija telefon: +386 1 24 28 550, faks: +386 1 24 28 558 e-pošta: [email protected] spletna stran: www.slokongres.com Odgovorni urednik: Franci Feltrin Urednica: Sonia Adriana Avguštin Grafična priprava: Benjamin Pezdir s.p. Tisk: Potens d.o.o. Konferenco so omogočili Urad Vlade RS za Slovence v zamejstvu in po svetu Agencija RS za raziskovalno dejavnost Mercator, d.d.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibition Opening Common Places
    EXHIBITION OPENING COMMON PLACES A CONSTELLATION OF MICRO-INTERVENTIONS IN NOVE FUŽINE, LJUBLJANA #exhibition 14 September 2016 – 29 October 2017 Museum of Architecture and Design (MAO) Pot na Fužine 2, Ljubljana, Slovenia Opening: 14 September at 18.00 MAO presents Common Places, a commissioned project by Chilean-French architecture office Plan Común and the Portuguese landscape architect Tiago Torres-Campos. Common Places is a series of brick constructions located in Nove Fužine, a part of Ljubljana where MAO is situated. Plan Común and Tiago Torres-Campos have designed five multifunctional plinths, which are strategically positioned over the entire neighbourhood: in the museum courtyard, along the river, in the historic garden, in front of the community centre and behind the famous city bus stop, designed by Saša J. Mächtig in the 1960s. The plinths build, encourage and reinforce different uses of public space and create specific relations with the surroundings. They intend to become platforms for contemplation, meeting points, stages for events, concerts or lectures, or simply structures on which to sit and enjoy the communal life of the neighbourhood. In order to encourage passers-by to think about these spaces, Slovenian writer Goran Vojnović wrote short stories about the selected sites in which he reflects youth in the neighbourhood. The limitations inherent in the project, in terms of timeframe, administrative work and budget, have been transformed into opportunities that concentrated the constellation around the easternmost urban enclave of Nove Fužine and MAO. This allowed for a more focused, even precise set of decisions on the interventions and the public space upon which they act.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Research and Forecast Report
    1 Research H1 2020 | Slovenia | and Forecast Report Colliers | International SLOVENIA MARKET OVERVIEW H1 | 2020 RESEARCH AND FORECAST REPORT 2 CONTENT Slovenia | Summary 3 H1 2020 Economic Overview 4 Office Market 6 Forecast Report Colliers | International Retail Market 8 Research and Industrial and Logistics Market 10 HTL Market 12 Investment Market 14 Residential Market 16 About Colliers 18 3 Research SUMMARY H1 2020 Recent Trends Market Forecast Slovenia | and The COVID-19 pandemic and related The large stimulus package announced by Forecast Report Colliers | International containment measures have strongly the authorities is expected to partly cushion affected Slovenia's economy, leading to a losses in employment and household year-on-year contraction in GDP and all incomes and pave the way to an economic main macroeconomic indicators. At the rebound in 2021. same time, the investment transaction New developments are announced in all volume of commercial real estate in H1 CRE sectors. As the currently least 2020 decreased amid pandemic developed sector, the industrial/ logistics uncertainties and travel restrictions, which sector is expected to see an increase in disabled investors to perform property developments in the coming years. With inspections. Total CRE investment volume proven resilience and rising demand, it in H1 2020 amounted to approx. €50 could become the big winner of the COVID- million, 60% less than in the same period 19 crises. 2019. The office sector was the most popular among investors, with 73% share The strongest investor demand is expected in total volume. to continue for core properties: income- generating properties with high occupancy, Apartment prices are still slightly prominent tenants and long-term leases.
    [Show full text]
  • Štetje Prebivalstva Leta 1754 V Predjožefinski Ljubljanski Škofiji in Njegovi Rezultati
    Vlado Valenčič Štetje prebivalstva leta 1754 v predjožefinski ljubljanski škofiji in njegovi rezultati Leta 1754 je bilo izvedeno v slovenskih deželah prvo štetje prebival­ stva. Bilo je v zvezi z davčnimi in socialnimi reformami, ki jih je tedaj v avstrijski državi pripravljala Marija Terezija.1 Podlago zanj je dal naj­ višji reskript od 13. oktobra 1753, ki je določal, naj se v ta namen izvede ljudsko štetje. Ugotovilo naj bi se število oseb vsakega posameznega kra­ ja po gospostvih in izkazalo v treh skupinah, komunikantih, to je osebah, ki so prejemale zakramente, spoved in obhajilo, mladini, sposobni za ver­ ski pouk, ter nedoletnih otrocih. Seznami štetih oseb naj bi vsebovali na­ vedbo spola, starosti in družbenega položaja (Condition, poklic). Deželnim vladam je bilo naročeno, naj se glede izvedbe sporazumejo s škofijskimi ordinariati; štetje je bilo naloga župnikov in župnih upraviteljev, ki bi morali sezname poslati svojim ordinarijem, ti pa konec vsakega vojaškega leta deželnim vladam, da bi jih poslale naprej na dvor.2 Ni popolnoma razjasnjeno, zakaj se vlada ni zadovoljila z izvedbo štetja po prvem res- kriptu in ali ga je hotela nadomestiti ali le dopolniti z drugačno izvedbo. Dne 19. januarja 1754 je bil namreč izdan reskript, ki je določal, naj se zaradi večje zanesljivosti izvede štetje po posvetnih gosposkah in magi­ stratih. Reskriptu je bil priložen obrazec za sestavo pregledov števila pre­ bivalstva, ločenega po spolu, v petih starostnih skupinah (1-15, 15-20, 20-40, 40-50 in nad 50 let); zadnje tri skupine je bilo treba ločiti po stanu (samski, poročeni).3 Ta obrazec naj bi se po nalogu deželne reprezentance 1 Henryk Grosismann, Die Anfänge und geschichtliche Entwicklung der amtlichen Statistik in Österreich.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment in the Sava River Basin
    PRELIMINARY FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT IN THE SAVA RIVER BASIN July, 2014 Date Document Revision History Document Author/Reviser 23 September 2013 Initial draft – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ PEG FP 17 December 2013 Draft 2 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić, M. Babić Mladenović 30 January 2014 Draft 2.1 – reviewed at 23rd PEG FP meeting Secretariat/ PEG FP 20 March 2014 Draft 3 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić, A. Bezdrob 14 April 2014 Draft 3.1 – sent as doc. for 24th PEG FP meeting Secretariat/ PEG FP 02 June 2014 Draft 4 – sent to PEG FP for comments Secretariat/ V. Tusić 10 June 2014 Draft 4.1 – sent to PEG FP for approval Secretariat/ PEG FP (no comments) 18 June 2014 Draft 5 – sent to ISRBC Secretariat/ ISRBC 01 July 2014 ISRBC accepted and approved publishing on web ISRBC International Sava River Basin Commission Kneza Branimira 29 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia T: + 385 1 488 69 60 F: + 385 1 488 69 86 [email protected] www.savacommission.org TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE SAVA RIVER BASIN .................................................................. 3 3 OVERALL APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 4 3.1 SLOVENIA ...........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]