The Projective Geometry of Mario Pieri: a Legacy of Georg Karl Christian Von Staudt

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Projective Geometry of Mario Pieri: a Legacy of Georg Karl Christian Von Staudt View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Historia Mathematica 33 (2006) 277–314 www.elsevier.com/locate/yhmat The projective geometry of Mario Pieri: A legacy of Georg Karl Christian von Staudt Elena Anne Corie Marchisotto ∗ Department of Mathematics, California State University, Northridge, CA 90265, USA Available online 21 October 2005 Abstract The research of Mario Pieri (1860–1913) can be classified into three main areas: metric differential and algebraic geometry and vector analysis; foundations of geometry and arithmetic; logic and the philosophy of science. In writing this article, I intend to reveal some important aspects of his contributions to the foundations of projective geometry, notably those that emanated from his intensive study of the works of Georg Karl Christian von Staudt (1798–1867). Pieri was the first geometer to successfully establish projective geometry as an independent subject (rigorous mathematical theory), freed from all ties to Euclidean geometry. The path to this achievement began with Staudt, and involved the reformulation of the classical ideas of cross ratio and projectivity in terms of harmonic sets, as well as a critical analysis of the proof of a fundamental theorem that connects these ideas. Included is a brief overview of Pieri’s life and work. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Sommario La ricerca di Mario Pieri (1860–1913) può essere classificata in tre zone principali: differenziale metrico e la geometria algebrica ed analisi di vettore; fondamenti della geometria e dell’aritmetica logica e la filosofia di scienza. Nel questo articolo, intendo rivelare alcune funzioni importanti dei suoi contributi ai fondamenti della geometria proiettiva, considerevolmente quelli che sono derivato dal suo studio intenso sugli impianti di Georg Karl Christian von Staudt (1798–1867). Pieri era il primo geometra per stabilire con successo la geometria proiettiva come oggetto indipendente, liberato da tutti i legami alla geometria euclidea. Il percorso a questo successo ha cominciato con Staudt ed ha coinvolto la nuova formulazione delle ideee classiche del rapporto e del projectivity trasversali in termini di insiemi armonici, così come un’analisi critica della prova di un teorema fondamentale che collega queste idee. Inclusa è una breve descrizione di vita e de lavoro del Pieri. * Fax: +1 818 677 3634. E-mail address: [email protected]. 0315-0860/$ – see front matter © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.hm.2005.08.002 278 E.A.C. Marchisotto / Historia Mathematica 33 (2006) 277–314 © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. MSC: 51-02; 51M35; 51J10; 01-02 Keywords: Mario Pieri; Georg Karl Christian von Staudt; Synthetic projective geometry; Harmonic set; Cross ratio; Projective transformation; The fundamental theorem of projective geometry; Pappus’s theorem 1. Introduction The research of Mario Pieri (1860–1913) can be classified into three main areas: (1) metric differential and algebraic geometry and vector analysis; (2) foundations of geometry and arithmetic; (3) logic and the philosophy of science. In writing this article, I intend to reveal some important aspects of his contributions to the foundations of projective geometry, notably those that emanated from his intensive study of the works of Georg Karl Christian von Staudt (1798–1867). Pieri was the first geometer to successfully establish projective geometry as an independent subject, freed from all ties to Euclidean geometry. The path to this achievement began with Staudt, whose famous Geometrie der Lage [1847] was intended to rid projective geometry of metric concepts. In this endeavor, the idea of a harmonic set played a pivotal role. Staudt appealed to it in reformulating two concepts of classical projective geometry: the cross ratio, which until his time had been defined metrically; and the projectivity, a transformation that had classically been defined in terms of sequences of correspondences called perspectivities. A fundamental theorem on projectivities (which ensures that the transformation is completely determined by assigning distinct collinear images to three distinct collinear points) intercedes in both of these ideas. This theorem is important not only to reconcile Staudt’s reformulated definitions of cross ratio and projectivity with their classical definitions, but also because it simplifies the proofs of other projective theorems, enabling them to be constructed without appealing to concepts extraneous to the theorems themselves (see, for example, [Coxeter, 1964, 34–35]). Staudt’s proof of the fundamental theorem, however, was one of the reasons that he did not achieve his goal of a metric-free projective geometry. Pieri would bring Staudt’s dream to fruition 50 years later with his axiomatization of projective geometry [Pieri, 1897–1898]. Before I trace the evolution of ideas beginning with [von Staudt, 1847] and culminating in [Pieri, 1897–1898] and its modifications, I give a brief overview in Section 2 of Pieri’s life and work.1 In Sec- tion 3, I discuss the classical concept of projection and section and relate this process to the construction of projectivities as finite sequences of perspectivities. In Section 4, I set the context for Staudt’s attempts to achieve a metric-free definition of projective geometry, by showing how he reformulated the classical definition of cross ratio into a purely projective one. To do this, I introduce the quadrangle, a funda- mental plane figure of projective geometry, and demonstrate how Staudt used it to construct harmonic sets. In Section 5, I show the role of harmonic sets in Staudt’s definition of projectivity. The fundamental theorem enters into the discussion in two ways: to ensure that Staudt’s cross ratio is well defined, and to equate Staudt’s definition of projectivity in terms of harmonic sets with the classical one in terms of 1 In-depth studies of Pieri’s life and research are currently being written. The following three books will be published by Birkhäuser, Boston: The Legacy of Mario Pieri: Geometry and Arithmetic [Marchisotto and Smith], The Legacy of Mario Pieri: Logic and Geometry [Marchisotto et al.],andThe Legacy of Mario Pieri: Differential and Algebraic Geometry [Marchisotto and Smith]. E.A.C. Marchisotto / Historia Mathematica 33 (2006) 277–314 279 perspectivities. In Section 6, I focus on gaps in Staudt’s reasoning, and in Section 7,IshowhowPieri attempted to fill them. In Section 8, I illustrate how Pieri eliminated the dependence on continuity to make Staudt’s arguments. An examination of Pieri’s [1897–1898] axiomatization in relation to certain other developments of n-dimensional projective geometry is the content of Section 9. 2. Overview of Pieri’s life and work Mario Pieri was born in Lucca, Italy, in the region of Tuscany. His father, Pellegrino, was a lawyer and recognized scholar. His mother was named Erminia Luporini. Pieri had four sisters and three brothers, one of whom, Silvio (1856–1936), was a noted professor of linguistics. Mario married late in life, at the age of 41, after he had moved to Catania in Sicily. He and his wife, Anelina Jannelli Anastasio, had no children. After pursuing his early studies in Lucca at elementary and technical schools, Pieri attended the Regio Istituto Tecnico di Bologna. This institute was established in 1862, one year after the foundation of the Regno d’Italia (Kingdom of Italy). Today it is known as the Istituto di Istruzione superiore Crescenzi Pacinotti. Pieri was enrolled in the Fisico-matematica section of the institute between 1876 and 1880, which made him eligible to study mathematics, physics, and engineering2 in any Italian university. Pieri studied mathematics at the University of Bologna beginning in 1880. His instructors included Salvatore Pincherle (1853–1936), one of the founders of functional analysis. In 1881, Pieri was awarded a scholarship to the leading mathematical center in Italy, the Scuola Reale Normale Superiore of Pisa. His instructors included Enrico Betti (1823–1892), who is credited with introducing the ideas of Bernhard Riemann (1826–1866) to Italy; Luigi Bianchi (1856–1928), who had been a student of Felix Klein (1849– 1925); and Riccardo de Paolis (1854–1892), who had been a student of Luigi Cremona (1830–1903). Pieri earned his doctorate in mathematics from the University of Pisa “with commendation” on June 27, 1884. His dissertation on the singularities of Jacobians of second-, third-, and fourth-degree polynomials was never published in any journal, but it was cited in an obituary [Levi, 1913, 1], written by Beppo Levi (1875–1961), who had been a student of Segre at Turin and later colleague of Pieri at Parma. Pieri wrote a second dissertation entitled Studi di Geometria Differenziali for the Scuola (dated September, 1884) which has, until now, never been reported in the literature.3 He also earned certification to teach in secondary school. Pieri taught briefly at a gymnasium (ginnasio) in Livorno and at a technical school in Pisa [Levi, 1913, 2; Rindi, 1919, 438]. During the same period (1885–1886), he gave a special course of lessons on polyhedra at his alma mater, the Scuola [Rindi, 1919, 438–439]. In 1886, Pieri won a competition to become professor of projective and descriptive geometry at the Regia Accademia Militare, which was located across the Via Verdi from the University of Turin. This Royal Military Academy was founded in the late 1600s by Carlo Emmanuelle II. It was the first institute of military instruction in the world. After World War II it was closed in Turin and became absorbed into the military academy in Modena, which exists today. 2 In Pieri’s time, in Italy, only those who studied at a liceo could study any subject they wanted at the university. Because Pieri was enrolled at an istituto, he was limited to university study of the indicated subjects. 3 Both dissertations are available at the University of Pisa library.
Recommended publications
  • Mathematics Is a Gentleman's Art: Analysis and Synthesis in American College Geometry Teaching, 1790-1840 Amy K
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2000 Mathematics is a gentleman's art: Analysis and synthesis in American college geometry teaching, 1790-1840 Amy K. Ackerberg-Hastings Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Higher Education and Teaching Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, and the Science and Mathematics Education Commons Recommended Citation Ackerberg-Hastings, Amy K., "Mathematics is a gentleman's art: Analysis and synthesis in American college geometry teaching, 1790-1840 " (2000). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 12669. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/12669 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margwis, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. in the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Chasles' Bad Relations
    Chasles' bad relations Christophe Ritzenthaler September 10, 2004 Michel Chasles (1793-1880) 1 Introduction We give here a very atypical orientation to Chasles' life. In particular we will not deal with the ordinary aspects of his life and work. This can be found in many places (in particular [1]). We mention only that, as a mathemati- cian, he synthesized and generalized the whole geometric knowledge of his time (projective geometry, conic sections, duality and homography) - even if sometimes, (as he didn't speak German), he merely rediscovered some of these results - ([3]). Also, as a historian of mathematics, he wrote a history of geometry ([5] and two controversial essays ( [2],[4]). The following list of honors should convince us of the seriousness of this character : Membre de l'Institut, professeur de Géométrie supérieure à la faculté des Sciences de Paris, membre de la Société royale de Londres, membre honoraire de la Société royale d'Irlande, de la Société philosophique de Cambridge, de l'Académie impériale des Sciences de Saint-Pétersbourg, associé de l'Académie royale des Sciences de Brux- elles,correspondant de l'académie ponticale des Nuovi Lincei de Rome, membre de lAcadémie royale de Berlin, de l'Académie royale des Sciences de Turin, de l'Académie royale des Sciences de Naples, de l'Académie de Lincei de Rome, de la Société royale danoise des Sciences de Copenhague, de l'Académie royale des Sciences de Stockholm, de l'Académie des Sciences de l'Institut de Bologne, de l'Institut roual lombard de Milan, de la Société italienne des Sciences de Modène, correspondant de l'Académie royale des Sciences de Madrid, de l'Institut vénitien des Sciences, Lettres et Arts, membre honoraire de l'Académie royale des Sciences, Lettres et Arts de Modène, de l'Athénée vénitien des Sciences et Lettres, de l'Université d'Odessa, de l'Académie américaine des Sciences et Arts de Boston, de l'Académie nationale des sciences d'Amérique.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Genealogy of the Wellesley College Department Of
    Nilos Kabasilas Mathematical Genealogy of the Wellesley College Department of Mathematics Elissaeus Judaeus Demetrios Kydones The Mathematics Genealogy Project is a service of North Dakota State University and the American Mathematical Society. http://www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu/ Georgios Plethon Gemistos Manuel Chrysoloras 1380, 1393 Basilios Bessarion 1436 Mystras Johannes Argyropoulos Guarino da Verona 1444 Università di Padova 1408 Cristoforo Landino Marsilio Ficino Vittorino da Feltre 1462 Università di Firenze 1416 Università di Padova Angelo Poliziano Theodoros Gazes Ognibene (Omnibonus Leonicenus) Bonisoli da Lonigo 1477 Università di Firenze 1433 Constantinople / Università di Mantova Università di Mantova Leo Outers Moses Perez Scipione Fortiguerra Demetrios Chalcocondyles Jacob ben Jehiel Loans Thomas à Kempis Rudolf Agricola Alessandro Sermoneta Gaetano da Thiene Heinrich von Langenstein 1485 Université Catholique de Louvain 1493 Università di Firenze 1452 Mystras / Accademia Romana 1478 Università degli Studi di Ferrara 1363, 1375 Université de Paris Maarten (Martinus Dorpius) van Dorp Girolamo (Hieronymus Aleander) Aleandro François Dubois Jean Tagault Janus Lascaris Matthaeus Adrianus Pelope Johann (Johannes Kapnion) Reuchlin Jan Standonck Alexander Hegius Pietro Roccabonella Nicoletto Vernia Johannes von Gmunden 1504, 1515 Université Catholique de Louvain 1499, 1508 Università di Padova 1516 Université de Paris 1472 Università di Padova 1477, 1481 Universität Basel / Université de Poitiers 1474, 1490 Collège Sainte-Barbe
    [Show full text]
  • RM Calendar 2019
    Rudi Mathematici x3 – 6’141 x2 + 12’569’843 x – 8’575’752’975 = 0 www.rudimathematici.com 1 T (1803) Guglielmo Libri Carucci dalla Sommaja RM132 (1878) Agner Krarup Erlang Rudi Mathematici (1894) Satyendranath Bose RM168 (1912) Boris Gnedenko 2 W (1822) Rudolf Julius Emmanuel Clausius (1905) Lev Genrichovich Shnirelman (1938) Anatoly Samoilenko 3 T (1917) Yuri Alexeievich Mitropolsky January 4 F (1643) Isaac Newton RM071 5 S (1723) Nicole-Reine Étable de Labrière Lepaute (1838) Marie Ennemond Camille Jordan Putnam 2004, A1 (1871) Federigo Enriques RM084 Basketball star Shanille O’Keal’s team statistician (1871) Gino Fano keeps track of the number, S( N), of successful free 6 S (1807) Jozeph Mitza Petzval throws she has made in her first N attempts of the (1841) Rudolf Sturm season. Early in the season, S( N) was less than 80% of 2 7 M (1871) Felix Edouard Justin Émile Borel N, but by the end of the season, S( N) was more than (1907) Raymond Edward Alan Christopher Paley 80% of N. Was there necessarily a moment in between 8 T (1888) Richard Courant RM156 when S( N) was exactly 80% of N? (1924) Paul Moritz Cohn (1942) Stephen William Hawking Vintage computer definitions 9 W (1864) Vladimir Adreievich Steklov Advanced User : A person who has managed to remove a (1915) Mollie Orshansky computer from its packing materials. 10 T (1875) Issai Schur (1905) Ruth Moufang Mathematical Jokes 11 F (1545) Guidobaldo del Monte RM120 In modern mathematics, algebra has become so (1707) Vincenzo Riccati important that numbers will soon only have symbolic (1734) Achille Pierre Dionis du Sejour meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Projective Geometry II
    The Rise of Projective Geometry II The Renaissance Artists Although isolated results from earlier periods are now considered as belonging to the subject of projective geometry, the fundamental ideas that form the core of this area stem from the work of artists during the Renaissance. Earlier art appears to us as being very stylized and flat. The Renaissance Artists Towards the end of the 13th century, early Renaissance artists began to attempt to portray situations in a more realistic way. One early technique is known as terraced perspective, where people in a group scene that are further in the back are drawn higher up than those in the front. Simone Martini: Majesty The Renaissance Artists As artists attempted to find better techniques to improve the realism of their work, the idea of vertical perspective was developed by the Italian school of artists (for example Duccio (1255-1318) and Giotto (1266-1337)). To create the sense of depth, parallel lines in the scene are represented by lines that meet in the centerline of the picture. Duccio's Last Supper The Renaissance Artists The modern system of focused perspective was discovered around 1425 by the sculptor and architect Brunelleschi (1377-1446), and formulated in a treatise a few years later by the painter and architect Leone Battista Alberti (1404-1472). The method was perfected by Leonardo da Vinci (1452 – 1519). The German artist Albrecht Dürer (1471 – 1528) introduced the term perspective (from the Latin verb meaning “to see through”) to describe this technique and illustrated it by a series of well- known woodcuts in his book Underweysung der Messung mit dem Zyrkel und Rychtsscheyed [Instruction on measuring with compass and straight edge] in 1525.
    [Show full text]
  • Cassirer and the Structural Turn in Modern Geometry
    JOURNAL FOR THE HISTORY OF ANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHY CASSIRER AND THE STRUCTURAL TURN IN MODERN VOLUME 6, NUMBER 3 GEOMETRY GeorG SCHIEMER EDITOR IN CHIEF KEVIN C. KLEMENt, UnIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS EDITORIAL BOARD The paper investigates Ernst Cassirer’s structuralist account ANNALISA COLIVA, UnIVERSITY OF MODENA AND UC IRVINE of geometrical knowledge developed in his Substanzbegriff und GrEG FROSt-ARNOLD, HOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES Funktionsbegriff (1910). The aim here is twofold. First, to give HENRY JACKMAN, YORK UnIVERSITY a closer study of several developments in projective geometry SANDRA LaPOINte, MCMASTER UnIVERSITY that form the direct background for Cassirer’s philosophical re- CONSUELO PRETI, THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY marks on geometrical concept formation. Specifically, the paper MARCUS ROSSBERG, UnIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT will survey different attempts to justify the principle of duality ANTHONY SKELTON, WESTERN UnIVERSITY in projective geometry as well as Felix Klein’s generalization of MARK TEXTOR, KING’S COLLEGE LonDON the use of geometrical transformations in his Erlangen program. AUDREY YAP, UnIVERSITY OF VICTORIA The second aim is to analyze the specific character of Cassirer’s RICHARD ZACH, UnIVERSITY OF CALGARY geometrical structuralism formulated in 1910 as well as in sub- sequent writings. As will be argued, his account of modern REVIEW EDITORS geometry is best described as a “methodological structuralism”, SEAN MORRIS, METROPOLITAN STATE UnIVERSITY OF DenVER that is, as a view mainly concerned with the role of structural SANFORD SHIEH, WESLEYAN UnIVERSITY methods in modern mathematical practice. DESIGN DaNIEL HARRIS, HUNTER COLLEGE JHAPONLINE.ORG SPECIAL ISSUE: METHOD, SCIENCe, AND MATHEMATICS: Neo-KANTIANISM AND ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY © 2018 GeorG SCHIEMER EDITED BY SCOTT EDGAR AND LyDIA PATTON CASSIRER AND THE STRUCTURAL TURN IN In this paper, we aim to further connect these two lines of re- MODERN GEOMETRY search.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    [ 229 • ] INDEX TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS, S e r ie s B, FOR THE YEAR 1897 (YOL. 189). B. Bower (F. 0.). Studies in the Morphology of Spore-producing Members.— III. Marattiaceae, 35. C Cheirostrobus, a new Type of Fossil Cone (Scott), 1. E. Enamel, Tubular, in Marsupials and other Animals (Tomes), 107. F. Fossil Plants from Palaeozoic Rocks (Scott), 1, 83. L. Lycopodiaceae; Spencerites, a new Genus of Cones from Coal-measures (Scott), 83. 230 INDEX. M. Marattiaceae, Fossil and Recent, Comparison of Sori of (Bower), 3 Marsupials, Tubular Enamel a Class Character of (Tomes), 107. N. Naqada Race, Variation and Correlation of Skeleton in (Warren), 135 P. Pteridophyta: Cheirostrobus, a Fossil Cone, &c. (Scott), 1. S. Scott (D. H.). On the Structure and Affinities of Fossil Plants from the Palaeozoic Ro ks.—On Cheirostrobus, a new Type of Fossil Cone from the Lower Carboniferous Strata (Calciferous Sandstone Series), 1. Scott (D. H.). On the Structure and Affinities of Fossil Plants from the Palaeozoic Rocks.—II. On Spencerites, a new Genus of Lycopodiaceous Cones from the Coal-measures, founded on the Lepidodendron Spenceri of Williamson, 83. Skeleton, Human, Variation and Correlation of Parts of (Warren), 135. Sorus of JDancea, Kaulfxissia, M arattia, Angiopteris (Bower), 35. Spencerites insignis (Will.) and S. majusculus, n. sp., Lycopodiaceous Cones from Coal-measures (Scott), 83. Sphenophylleae, Affinities with Cheirostrobus, a Fossil Cone (Scott), 1. Spore-producing Members, Morphology of.—III. Marattiaceae (Bower), 35. Stereum lvirsutum, Biology of; destruction of Wood by (Ward), 123. T. Tomes (Charles S.). On the Development of Marsupial and other Tubular Enamels, with Notes upon the Development of Enamels in general, 107.
    [Show full text]
  • A Concise History of Mathematics the Beginnings 3
    A CONCISE HISTORY OF A CONCISE HISTORY MATHEMATICS STRUIK OF MATHEMATICS DIRK J. STRUIK Professor Mathematics, BELL of Massachussetts Institute of Technology i Professor Struik has achieved the seemingly impossible task of compress- ing the history of mathematics into less than three hundred pages. By stressing the unfolding of a few main ideas and by minimizing references to other develop- ments, the author has been able to fol- low Egyptian, Babylonian, Chinese, Indian, Greek, Arabian, and Western mathematics from the earliest records to the beginning of the present century. He has based his account of nineteenth cen- tury advances on persons and schools rather than on subjects as the treatment by subjects has already been used in existing books. Important mathema- ticians whose work is analysed in detail are Euclid, Archimedes, Diophantos, Hammurabi, Bernoulli, Fermat, Euler, Newton, Leibniz, Laplace, Lagrange, Gauss, Jacobi, Riemann, Cremona, Betti, and others. Among the 47 illustra- tions arc portraits of many of these great figures. Each chapter is followed by a select bibliography. CHARLES WILSON A CONCISE HISTORY OF MATHEMATICS by DIRK. J. STRUIK Professor of Mathematics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology LONDON G. BELL AND SONS LTD '954 Copyright by Dover Publications, Inc., U.S.A. FOR RUTH Printed in Great Britain by Butler & Tanner Ltd., Frame and London CONTENTS Introduction xi The Beginnings 1 The Ancient Orient 13 Greece 39 The Orient after the Decline of Greek Society 83 The Beginnings in Western Europe 98 The
    [Show full text]
  • Methods, Figures, and Practices in Early Nineteenth Century Geometry
    Die Freude an der Gestalt: Methods, Figures, and Practices in Early Nineteenth Century Geometry by Jemma Lorenat M. A., City University of New York Graduate Center, B. A., San Francisco State University Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Joint Degree (cotutelle) Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science at Simon Fraser University (Canada); Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6), Institut de mathématiques de Jussieu-Paris Rive Gauche (France) c Jemma Lorenat 2015 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2015 All rights reserved. However, in accordance with the Copyright Act of Canada, this work may be reproduced without authorization under the conditions for “Fair Dealing.” Therefore, limited reproduction of this work for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review and news reporting is likely to be in accordance with the law, particularly if cited appropriately. APPROVAL Name: Jemma Lorenat Degree: Doctor of Philosophy (Mathematics) Title of Thesis: Die Freude an der Gestalt: Methods, Figures, and Practices in Early Nineteenth Century Geometry Examining Committee: Brenda Davison Chair Department of Mathematics Dr. Thomas Archibald Senior Supervisor (co-tutelle) Professor Dr. Catherine Goldstein Senior Supervisor (co-tutelle) Directrice de recherche au CNRS, Institut de mathématiques de Jussieu-Paris Rive gauche Dr. Nilima Nigam Supervisor Professor Dr. Christian Gilain Internal Examiner (co-tutelle) by videoconference (Paris) Professeur émérite à l’Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie (Paris 6) Dr. Dirk Schlimm External Examiner Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, McGill University Date Defended: 10 April 2015 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii ABSTRACT As recounted by later historians, modern geometry began with Jean Victor Poncelet, whose contributions then spread to Germany alongside an opposition between geometric methods that came to be exemplified by the antagonism of Julius Plücker, an analytic geometer, and Jakob Steiner, a synthetic geometer.
    [Show full text]
  • RM Calendar 2021
    Rudi Mathematici x3 – 6’147x2 + 12’594’419 x – 8’600’917’233 = 0 www.rudimathematici.com 1 F (1803) Guglielmo Libri Carucci dalla Sommaja RM132 (1878) Agner Krarup Erlang Rudi Mathematici (1894) Satyendranath Bose RM168 (1912) Boris Gnedenko 2 S (1822) Rudolf Julius Emmanuel Clausius RM240 (1905) Lev Genrichovich Shnirelman (1938) Anatoly Samoilenko 3 S (1917) Yuri Alexeievich Mitropolsky January 1 4 M (1643) Isaac Newton RM071 5 T (1723) Nicole-Reine Étable de Labrière Lepaute (1838) Marie Ennemond Camille Jordan (1871) Federigo Enriques RM084 Putnam 2006, A1 (1871) Gino Fano Find the volume of the region of points ( x, y, z) such 6 W (1807) Jozeph Mitza Petzval that (1841) Rudolf Sturm (x2 + y2 + z2 + 8) 2 ≤ 36( x2 + y2). 7 T (1871) Felix Edouard Justin Émile Borel (1907) Raymond Edward Alan Christopher Paley Math’s Jokes 8 F (1888) Richard Courant RM156 Maths Teacher: Now suppose the number of sheep is (1924) Paul Moritz Cohn x... (1942) Stephen William Hawking Student: Yes sir, but what happens if the number of 9 S (1864) Vladimir Adreievich Steklov sheep is not x? (1882) Pavel Aleksandrovič Florenskij RM252 (1915) Mollie Orshansky 10 S (1875) Issai Schur The Ways of the Statisticians (1905) Ruth Moufang Statisticians do it continuously but discretely. 2 11 M (1545) Guidobaldo del Monte RM120 (1707) Vincenzo Riccati Histories make men wise; poets, witty; the mathematics, (1734) Achille Pierre Dionis du Sejour subtle; natural philosophy, deep; moral, grave; logic and 12 T (1853) Gregorio Ricci-Curbastro rhetoric, able to contend. (1906) Kurt August Hirsch Francis Bacon (1915) Herbert Ellis Robbins RM156 13 W (1864) Wilhelm Karl Werner Otto Fritz Franz Wien One of the endlessly alluring aspects of mathematics is (1876) Luther Pfahler Eisenhart that its thorniest paradoxes have a way of blooming into (1876) Erhard Schmidt beautiful theories.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthur Cayley As Sadleirian Professor
    Historia Mathematica 26 (1999), 125–160 Article ID hmat.1999.2233, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Arthur Cayley as Sadleirian Professor: A Glimpse of Mathematics View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.ukTeaching at 19th-Century Cambridge brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Tony Crilly Middlesex University Business School, The Burroughs, London NW4 4BT, UK E-mail: [email protected] This article contains the hitherto unpublished text of Arthur Cayley’s inaugural professorial lecture given at Cambridge University on 3 November 1863. Cayley chose a historical treatment to explain the prevalent basic notions of analytical geometry, concentrating his attention in the period (1638–1750). Topics Cayley discussed include the geometric interpretation of complex numbers, the theory of pole and polar, points and lines at infinity, plane curves, the projective definition of distance, and Pascal’s and Maclaurin’s geometrical theorems. The paper provides a commentary on this lecture with reference to Cayley’s work in geometry. The ambience of Cambridge mathematics as it existed after 1863 is briefly discussed. C 1999 Academic Press Cet article contient le texte jusqu’ici in´editde la le¸coninaugurale de Arthur Cayley donn´ee `a l’Universit´ede Cambridge le 3 novembre 1863. Cayley choisit une approche historique pour expliquer les notions fondamentales de la g´eom´etrieanalytique, qui existaient alors, en concentrant son atten- tion sur la p´eriode1638–1750. Les sujets discut´esincluent l’interpretation g´eom´etriquedes nombres complexes, la th´eoriedes pˆoleset des polaires, les points et les lignes `al’infini, les courbes planes, la d´efinition projective de la distance, et les th´eor`emesg´eom´etriquesde Pascal et de Maclaurin.
    [Show full text]
  • ICHM-Report on 29Th Novembertagung on the History of Mathematics.Pdf
    Report on 29th Novembertagung on the History of Mathematics Co-sponsored by the ICHM 28th-30th November 2018 The 29th Novembertagung on the History of Mathematics took place at the Institute of Mathematics of the University of Sevilla (Spain) on November 28th to 30th. The theme we proposed was “History of Mathematical Concepts and Conceptual History of Mathematics”. As is usual in the Novembertagung, the theme served as a guide and did not preclude the participation of thosenot committed to it directly. This edition of the Novembertagung counted 45 participants from 13 different countries: Spain, United Kingdom, Mexico, Germany, France, Israel, Portugal, Switzerland, USA, Belgium, Austria, Italy and the Czech Republic. Although the majority of participants were coming from Europe, some of them came from other continents as well, which gives an idea of the international level of the event and the wider diffusion that the Novembertagung is gaining year after year. This opens the possibility of future venues outside Europe and suggests that history of mathematics is very alive among young researchers. There were 35 talks divided into two parallel sessions and two plenary sessions given by senior scholars (see the program and the abstracts below). As is traditional in the Novembertagung, there was a final meeting to discuss next year’s venue and some other issues participants wished to raise relating to the future of the event. As an event for young researchers, thanks to the help given by several sponsors, we were able to cover food and accommodation for every participant during the meeting and we were able to give a high number of travel grants for those who requested them.
    [Show full text]