DOCSLIB.ORG

© in This Web Service Cambridge University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
© in This Web Service Cambridge University Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-11968-0 - Shakespeare and Manuscript Drama: Canon, Collaboration, and Text James Purkis Index More information Index A boke of prayers called ye ordynary Byrne, Muriel St Clare, 35–6, 53, 55, faschyon of good lyuynge, 241 187, 246, 282 Alexander, Peter, 7 Arden of Faversham, 246, 249, 285 C., J. Attridge, Derek, 146, 185 The Two Merry Milkmaids,79 Campbell, Nicole, 100 Bald, R. C., 147, 154, 166, 209–11, Chambers, E. K., 32, 137, 287 238–9, 254, 287 Chambers, R. W., 16, 195–6, 198, Barker, Richard Hindry, 118 224–31, 238, 244–5, 252, 265, Baskervill, Charles Read, 98–9 279 Bate, Jonathan, and Eric Rasmussen Chapman, George, 125, 198–9, 213 Collaborative Plays, 286 Charlemagne, 32, 53, 242 Bateson, F. W., 241 Chettle, Henry, 139, 232–4, 241, 246 Bayfield, M. A., 205–6, 216, 239 contribution to John of Bordeaux, Bennington, Geoffrey, 133 183 Bentley, Gerald Eades, 23, 47, 94, 99, contribution to Sir Thomas More,149, 125, 131, 139 156–63,170,173,179,181,184, Blayney, Peter W. M., 15, 145, 149, 187–8, 192, 205, 233–4, 263, 154, 157–60, 163, 174, 178, 270, 275, 277–82, 290 180, 184, 186–8, 254, 270, Kind-Harts Dreame, 278–9, 281 278–9, 281, 289 revision of Friar Rush and the Proud Boswell, Eleanore, 98, 100 Woman of Antwerp, 139 Boswell, James, 50, 56 The Tragedy of Hoffman, Bowers, Fredson, 7, 100, 172 246, 279–82, 290 ‘intermediate fair copy’,85–6 Chillington, Carol A., 157, 166, 187, Bradley, David, 99 229, 255 Brandl, Alois, 238 Clare, Janet, 155 Brathwait, Richard, 132–3 Clavell, John Braunmuller, A. R., 290 The Soddered Citizen, 242 Briggs, Julia, 115, 122, 128, 134, 138 Cohen, Walter, 261, 268 Brooke, C. F. Tucker, 18, 191, 193, Collier, John Payne, 35, 54 236, 247–53, 256, 279, 283–4, Collins, D. C., 231 286, 288 Coortesse, Richard Brooks, Douglas A., 103 An exposition of certayne words of Brown, Arthur, 61, 76, 80, 84–8, 98–9, S. Paule, 241 189 Cox, John D. and David Scott Kastan, Buc, Sir George, 1, 101, 109, 113–17, 102 129, 135, 138 Craig, Hugh, and Arthur F. Kinney, Bullen, A. H., 58–9, 99 103 307 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-11968-0 - Shakespeare and Manuscript Drama: Canon, Collaboration, and Text James Purkis Index More information 308 Index Craig, W. J., 248 Fletcher, John, 19, 125, 240 Crystal, David, 217, 241 Bonduca, 51, 97 The Noble Gentleman, 246 Daborne, Robert, 97 Fletcher, John, and Philip Massinger Dawson, Giles E., 127, 207, 211, Sir John Van Olden Barnavelt, 238–40, 243 56, 57 Day, John and William Haughton Fletcher, John, and William Friar Rush and the Proud Woman of Shakespeare Antwerp, 139 The Two Noble Kinsmen, 248–9, Day, John, Richard Hathway, 252–3 Wentworth Smith, and other Foakes, R. A., 139, 170, 220, 2 Black Dog, 139 241 De Grazia, Margreta, 3 Forker, Charles R., 285, 290 Dekker, Thomas, 179, 241 Foucault, Michel, 105 contribution to Sir Thomas More, Foxe, John 159, 169–70, 173, 178–9, Book of Martyrs, 241 181–5, 189–90, 192, 194, 223, 236, 255–6, 288 Gabrieli, Vittorio, and Giorgio Fortunatus, 139 Melchiori, 148, 154, 158, 179, Match Me in London, 244 186, 241, 267 Dekker, Thomas, and Thomas Garber, Marjorie, 19 Middleton Gardner, Helen, 4–5, 7 1 Honest Whore, 189, 232 Glapthorne, Henry Derrida, Jacques, 6–7, 52, 185 The Lady Mother, 100 supplementarity, 14 Goffe, Thomas Dessen, Alan C., and Leslie Thomson, The Careless Shepherdess, 139 99 Golding, S. R., 228 Deutschberger, Paul, 227, 229, 244 Gossett, Suzanne, 103 Douglas, Gawin Greene, Robert, and Thomas Lodge The xiii. bukes of Eneados of the A Looking Glass for London and famose poete Virgill, 241 England, 62, 99 Downs, Gerald, 221 Greene, Robert? Drayton, Michael, Richard Hathway, John of Bordeaux, 183, 242 Anthony Munday, and Robert Greg, W. W., 3–5, 7–12, 16–18, 26–7, Wilson 34–6, 41, 47, 50, 52–5, 59–60, Sir John Oldcastle, 232, 246 72, 82, 84–7, 89–92, 94–5, 97, Dutton, Richard, 129, 138 99, 102, 106, 128, 135–6, Dyce, Alexander, 187 147–8, 171, 173, 182, 188, 196, 199–201, 205, 207, Edmond Ironside, 62, 93–5 209–10, 229, 237–8, 240, Egan, Gabriel, 48–51, 53, 56–7, 73 257, 272 Erne, Lukas, 98, 291 contribution to Shakespeare’s Hand, Evans, G. Blakemore, 144, 148, 36, 53, 148, 157, 165, 167, 258 181, 183, 186, 189, 194–5, 208, 220, 237 Fair Em, 248 documentary evidence, 9, 28–33, The Faithful Friends, 242 51–2, 54 Field, Nathan, John Fletcher, and Philip edition of The Second Maiden’s Massinger Tragedy, 101, 106, 109–18, The Honest Man’s Fortune, 243 123–4, 127–8, 138–9 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-11968-0 - Shakespeare and Manuscript Drama: Canon, Collaboration, and Text James Purkis Index More information Index 309 edition of Sir Thomas More,14–15, The Captives,1,10–12, 29–32, 52–4, 143, 145–9, 154–6, 158–60, 58–101, 106–7, 109, 116, 136, 162–3, 166, 170, 174, 180, 160, 167–8, 172, 189, 213, 222, 182–3, 186, 188–9, 192–4, 197, 276 222, 236–8, 243, 247, 253–4, The Escapes of Jupiter, 168, 189 257–9, 263–4, 282, 288 The Exemplary Lives and ‘foul papers’, 29, 84 Memorable Acts of Nine the playhouse revision, 25–6, 30–1, 33, Most Worthy Women in the 37–9, 41, 46–7, 54, 64, 69, World,91 123–4 and Hand B, 167–9, 188, 205, ‘prompt books’,27–33, 42, 47–8, 287 51–3, 58, 75, 84, 92, 106 1 If You Know Not Me, You Know Grigely, Joseph, 52 Nobody, 189 Gurr, Andrew, 92–3, 95 The Royal King, and the Loyal Subject, 187 Hammond, Antony, 35, 77 and Sir Thomas More, 159, 167–9, Hand B, 161–74, 176, 179–81, 183–5, 184, 228, 245, see also Hand B 188–9, 192–4, 208, 218–19, Hinman, Charlton, 4 223, 231, 242, 256, 259, 261–2, Hirrel, Michael J., 98 267, 270–4, 276–8, 287–9, The. holie. Bible conteynyng the olde see also Heywood, Thomas Testament and the newe, Hand C, 277 241 contribution to John a Kent and John Holinshed, Raphael, 259–60, 262–3 a Cumber,36–7, 39–41, 53–4, Honigmann, E. A. J., 3, 7–8, 18–19, 35, 56 53, 85–6, 100, 211–12, 220, contribution to Sir Thomas More, 231, 238, 284–6 158–9, 162, 165–6, 170–85, Howard-Hill, T. H., 5, 56–7, 138 188–9, 191–4, 205, 218, 223, Huber, R. A., 206–7 225, 234, 237, 251, 254–7, 259, 261–4, 267, 270–6, Ichikawa, Mariko, 70 289–90 Ioppolo, Grace, 35, 53, 86–9, 92, Hand D, 14–17, 127, 154, 170–1, 221–2, 240, 243 174, 179–82, 191–236, 247, 257–87, see also Shakespeare, Jackson, MacDonald P., 35, 103, 116, William 127–9, 137–8, 148, 154, 186, Harbage, Alfred, 4 214–15, 217–19, 227, 229–36, Harrison, G. B., 231 238, 240–2, 245–6, 285 Hays, Michael, 239–40 Janzen, Henry D., 189 Heminges, John, and Henry Condell, Jenkins, Harold, 167, 238 237, 249–50, 284–5 Jenkinson, Hilary, 239 Henslowe, Philip, 97, 136, 210 Johnson, Barbara, 14 diary, 125, 139, 169, 241 Jonson, Ben, 125 Herbert, J. A., 208 Every Man Out of His Humour, Herbert, Sir Henry, 58, 60, 63, 92, 244 94–6 Jowett, John, 3, 5–6, 53, 102, 144–5, Heywood, John 148–52, 154–6, 158–9, 166–71, The Four Ps, 242 178–84, 186, 189, 219, 222–4, Heywood, Thomas, 1, 101, 157, 179, 243, 248, 250, 256, 261, 263, 208, 213, 232, 240 267, 275, 277, 280–2, 287–90 A Maidenhead Well Lost, 187 Judson, Alexander Corbin, 59, 62 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-11968-0 - Shakespeare and Manuscript Drama: Canon, Collaboration, and Text James Purkis Index More information 310 Index Kastan, David Scott, 26, 47, 103 Metz, G. Harold, 149, 154, 241 Kinney, Arthur F., 244 Middleton, Thomas, 1, 179 Knight, Edward, 8, 97, 243 A Game at Chess, 140 Kyd, Thomas, 205 A Trick to Catch the Old One, The Spanish Tragedy, 285 246 The Family of Love, 246 Lake, David J., 118, 154, 231 The Second Maiden’s Tragedy,1, Lancashire, Anne, 106, 109–11, 113, 13–14, 16, 27, 100–40, 172, 115–17, 120–2, 124, 127, 129, 218, 242, 272 138–40 Mountford, Walter Law, Robert Adger, 188 The Launching of the Mary, 32, 53, Lea, K. M., 93 92, 95, 100 Levine, Nina, 259 Mowat, Barbara A., 2, 6, 8 Littledale, H., 100 Mucedorus, 248 Long, William B., 1, 3, 10–11, 27, Muir, Kenneth, 144 31, 34–7, 39, 41–54, 56–7, Munday, Anthony, 1, 232, 241 64, 69, 72, 76, 94–5, 98, 100, contribution to Sir Thomas More, 89, 148, 154 147–52, 154, 156–7, 159, Lyotard, Jean-François, 18, 100, 104, 161–6, 171–7, 179, 184, 186, 137 188–9, 192, 194, 218–19, 223, 237, 256–7, 259, 261–4, 266–8, Marcus, Leah S., 36 270, 273, 289–90 Marston, John, 210 John a Kent and John a Cumber,1, The Fawn, 210 10, 32, 34–51, 53, 55–6, 58, The Malcontent, 210 64–5, 69, 72, 79, 82–3, 91, 97, Mason, John 106, 147–8, 150, 170, 172–3, The Turke, 241 185–6, 237 Massinger, Philip, 240, 248 Munday, Anthony, Henry Chettle, Believe as You List, 9, 18, 32, 53, 89, Thomas Heywood?, and 92, 95, 100 Thomas Dekker The Bondman, 210 Sir Thomas More,1–2, 14, 19, The Duke of Milan, 210, 240 32, 34–5, 53–4, 89, 100, The Parliament of Love,93–4, 100 102–3, 127, 131, 137, 143–86, Masten, Jeffrey A., 103–5, 131–3, 135 189, 191–236, 247–8, 251–87, McGann, Jerome J., 23 291 McKerrow, Ronald B., 4, 24–6, 32, 38, Murphy, Andrew, 2 41, 101–2, 120, 129, 136, 138, 214 Nosworthy, J.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Introduction to Shakespeare, by 1
    An Introduction to Shakespeare, by 1 An Introduction to Shakespeare, by H. N. MacCracken and F. E. Pierce and W. H. Durham This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net Title: An Introduction to Shakespeare Author: H. N. MacCracken F. E. Pierce W. H. Durham Release Date: January 16, 2010 [EBook #30982] Language: English Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 An Introduction to Shakespeare, by 2 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK AN INTRODUCTION TO SHAKESPEARE *** Produced by Al Haines [Frontispiece: TITLE-PAGE OF THE FIRST FOLIO, 1628 The first collected edition of Shakespeare's Plays (From the copy in the New York Public Library)] AN INTRODUCTION TO SHAKESPEARE BY H. N. MacCRACKEN, PH.D. F. E. PIERCE, PH.D. AND W. H. DURHAM, PH.D. OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LITERATURE IN THE SHEFFIELD SCIENTIFIC SCHOOL OF YALE UNIVERSITY New York THE MACMILLAN COMPANY 1925 All rights reserved PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA An Introduction to Shakespeare, by 3 COPYRIGHT, 1910, By THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. Set up and electrotyped. Published September, 1910. Reprinted April, December, 1911; September, 1912; July, 1913; July, 1914; December, 1915; November, 1916; May, 1918; July, 1919; November, 1920; September, 1921; June, 1923; January, 1925. Norwood Press J. S. Cushing Co.--Berwick & Smith Co. Norwood, Mass., U.S.A. {v} PREFACE The advances made in Shakespearean scholarship within the last half-dozen years seem to justify the writing of another manual for school and college use.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    introduction Romance is a twilight zone in studies of late sixteenth-century literary genres in England. Half-way between the nostalgia of medieval chivalry and the enterprising spirit of early modern exploration, piracy and com- merce as preludes to a future empire, it is both very old-fashioned and innovatively modern. Appearing in narrative as well as in dramatic forms, romance lays simultaneous claims to history and imagination, which were not necessarily in opposition in the period, and caters for a readership of servants and citizens while equally fi nding its way into Spenserian epic, Sidneyan pastoral or even late Shakespearian tragicomedy and Miltonian poetry. The three plays grouped in this volume are early modern attempts at conquering that twilight zone in a context of expanding contacts with Muslim lands around the Mediterranean. romance and conquest in early modern england ‘The structural core of all fi ction’ for Northrop Frye, who sees it as a means to translate mythical archetypes into human experience, 1 romance is also ‘a notoriously slippery category’, as Barbara Fuchs warns. 2 The basic defi nition with which Helen Cooper starts her authoritative study of the genre is a primarily narrative fi ction in the vernacular which appears from the twelfth century onward, characterised by exotic settings, distant in time and/or place, concerned with love and/or chivalry, and involving high-ranking individuals engaged in some ideal quest. It may include such recurrent patterns as encounters with the supernatural, obscured identities or miraculous conversions. 3 Patricia Parker’s earlier deconstructionist approach complicates this defi nition by insisting on the proliferating digressions which form the structure of romance and defer its closure and collective coherence.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.5 X 11 Long Title.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-11103-4 - Shakespeare Survey: Close Encounters with Shakespeare’s Text Edited by Peter Holland Excerpt More information SHAKESPEARE, TEXT AND PARATEXT SONIA MASSAI ‘Reader, . Introth you are a stranger to me; why should liography. One crucial aspect of this legacy is the I Write to you? you neuer writ to mee.’ common tendency to identify the printer’s copy (Nathaniel Field, A Woman is a Weather-Cock, rather than the printed text as the ultimate source v STC 10854, 1612,A3 ) of textual authority. As a result, all those features ‘To the onely rewarder, and most iust poiser of ver- that were added to the printer’s copy as the dra- tuous merits, the most honorably renowned No-body, matic manuscript was transmitted into print and bounteous Mecænas of Poetry, and Lord Protector of transformed into a reading text tend to be over- oppressed innocence.’ looked. The paradox of course is that no dramatic (John Marston, Antonio and Mellida, manuscripts used as printer’s copy to set up early STC 17473, 1602,A2) modern playbooks have survived.1 Scholars inter- ested in Shakespeare and performance often criti- The early modern dramatic paratext is a rich cize the ‘tyranny of print’.2 Ironically, the study of and varied repository of tributes to patrons and Shakespeare in print has also been deeply affected readers, where dramatists negotiated or parodied by the ‘tyranny of the lost manuscript’. This under- their attitudes towards dramatic publication and standing of the printed text as a misrepresentation their reliance on the medium of print as a source of the printer’s copy, combined with the absence of income and literary reputation.
    [Show full text]
  • Heads, Coins and Rebellion in the Famous History of Sir Thomas Wyatt (C
    ‘Noble being Base’: Heads, Coins and Rebellion in The Famous History of Sir Thomas Wyatt (c. 1602) Jenny Sager University of Cologne [email protected] This article examines a lesser-known play, The Famous History of Sir Thomas Wyatt, which, in a trend initiated by David Bevington, and expanded upon by Judith D. Spikes and Julia Gasper, has been read primarily for its topical link to the Essex Rebellion.1 It is the contention of this article that the play should instead be considered for its broader ruminations on the power of the monarchy and the ability of rebels to usurp royal authority through the metaphoric associations of coins and heads, both of which have prominent connection to the main setting of the play: the Tower of London. Thomas Dekker and John Webster’s early Jacobean history play depicts the story of Lady Jane’s nine day reign, Mary’s succession to the throne, the Spanish marriage, and Quotations from The Famous History of Sir Thomas Wyatt are taken from the following edition: The Dramatic Works of Thomas Dekker, ed. by Fredson Bowers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), Vol. 1. In the interest of readability, I have modernised the spelling and punctuation of all early modern texts, with the exception of the titles of primary texts listed in the notes. Those exceptions withstanding, the letters ‘u’, ‘v’, ‘i’ and ‘j’ have been silently normalised in accordance with modern usage. The use of capitalisation has also been silently normalised. The use of italics within the text has also been silently removed to provide clarity for the modern reader.
    [Show full text]
  • The Absence of America on the Early Modern Stage by Gavin R. Hollis A
    The Absence of America on the Early Modern Stage by Gavin R. Hollis A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (English Language and Literature) in The University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Valerie J. Traub, Chair Professor Michael C. Schoenfeldt Associate Professor Susan M. Juster Associate Professor Susan Scott Parrish © Gavin Hollis 2008 To my parents ii Acknowledgements In an episode of The Simpsons, Marge urges Bart not to make fun of graduate students because “they’ve just made a terrible life choice.” This may be true, but one of the many advantages of this “life choice” is that I have met, been inspired by, and become firm friends with an array of people on both sides of the pond. The first debt I owe is to my advisors at the University of Michigan, who have seen this project through its many stages of confusion and incoherence. Mike Schoenfeldt, Scotti Parrish, and Sue Juster have been supportive, critical, rigorous, inventive, and excellent company. My biggest debt of gratitude is owed however to Valerie Traub, the chair of my dissertation committee, whose influence on this project and has been, and I hope will continue to be, immense. I’m also indebted to faculty at Trinity Hall, Cambridge and at The Shakespeare Institute who have shaped me as a scholar before I made it these shores. I am especially grateful to Peter Holland, who, it is no exaggeration to say, taught me how to read Shakespeare. Thank you also to John Jowett, Drew Milne, and John Lennard.
    [Show full text]
  • So We Are Talking Roughly About Twenty‐Five Years of Theatre. Roughly, Because the Tendencies That Characteriz
    So we are talking roughly about twenty‐five years of theatre. Roughly, because the tendencies that characterize Jacobean theatre started before James I came to the throne (1603, died 1625) around the year 1599 – the year when the Lord Chamberlain’s Men relocated their theatre from Shoreditch to Southwark (on the southern bank of the Thames) and called it “The Globe”, the year when the private theatre of Paul’s boys was reopened, and a little later the Lord Chamberlain’s Men got hold of the Blackfriars theatre. These developments brought about an unprecedented avalanche of play‐writing and dramaturgical innovation that made the Jacobean period one of the most dynamic and spectacular periods in theatre history as we know it. The period also established a new generation of playwrights: the most prominent of whom are Ben Jonson, John Marston, George Chapman, Thomas Middleton, John Webster, Francis Beaumont and John Fletcher – who worked alongside, competed with, collaborated and learned from William Shakespeare – the major figure that continued to sway the English stage from the Elizabethan well into the Jacobean period. 1 Of course, at the beginning of the period the most successful playwright in London was Shakespeare. So far, his fame rested mainly on the series of history plays: the two tetralogies (Henry VI, Parts I‐III and Richard III; and Richard II, Henry IV, Parts I‐II and Henry V) and King John; and his witty romantic comedies that Queen Elizabeth reportedly liked so much: e.g. Love’s Labour’s Lost, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Much Ado About Nothing, As You Like It.
    [Show full text]
  • Viiirenaissance Drama: Excluding Shakespeare
    VIII Renaissance Drama: Excluding Downloaded from Shakespeare EOIN PRICE, ELIZABETH SHARRETT, HELEN F. SMITH, PER http://ywes.oxfordjournals.org/ SIVEFORS, AND CLARE WHITEHEAD This chapter has three sections: 1. Editions and Textual Matters; 2. Theatre History; 3. Criticism. Section 1 is by Eoin Price; section 2 is by Elizabeth Sharrett; section 3(a) is by Helen F. Smith; section 3(b) is by Per Sivefors; section 3(c) is by Clare Whitehead. at Keio University (PULC Consortium) on March 18, 2016 1. Editions and Textual Matters The year 2013 was a significant one for The Spanish Tragedy: it appeared as a single edition in the Arden Early Modern Drama series and as part of the RSC’s William Shakespeare and Others: Collaborative Plays. Another edition was added to that list in 2014: Michael Neill’s Norton Critical Edition. The Norton format, designed with the student reader in mind, combines the expected ingredients—text, annotations, and introduction—with useful supplementary material—secondary sources; extracts from influential critical essays—so the edition comfortably differentiates itself from either of last year’s offerings. Neill, one of the most accomplished and experienced editors of early modern plays, has produced a typically fine edition that offers an excellent introduction to this important play. The Norton advertising blurb promises an ‘authoritative text’ but, of course, the matter is rather more complicated than that, as Neill’s ‘Textual Note’ attests. Neill’s base text is the British Library’s 1592 quarto-form octavo and this has been collated with the same library’s 1602 version, in which, famously, a number of new scenes were introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterodox Drama: Theater in Post-Reformation London
    Heterodox Drama: Theater in Post-Reformation London Musa Gurnis-Farrell Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2011 © 2011 Musa Gurnis-Farrell All rights reserved ABSTRACT Heterodox Drama: Theater in Post-Reformation London Musa Gurnis-Farrell In “Heterodox Drama: Theater in Post-Reformation London,” I argue that the specific working practices of the theater industry generated a body of drama that combines the varied materials of post-Reformation culture in hybrid fantasies that helped audiences emotionally negotiate and productively re-imagine early modern English religious life. These practices include: the widespread recycling of stock figures, scenarios, and bits of dialogue to capitalize on current dramatic trends; the collaboration of playwrights and actors from different religious backgrounds within theater companies; and the confessionally diverse composition of theater audiences. By drawing together a heterodox conglomeration of Londoners in a discursively capacious cultural space, the theaters created a public. While the public sphere that emerges from early modern theater culture helped audience members process religious material in politically significant ways, it did so not primarily through rational-critical thought but rather through the faculties of affect and imagination. The theater was a place where the early modern English could creatively reconfigure existing confessional identity categories, and emotionally experiment with the rich ideological contradictions of post-Reformation life. ! Table of Contents Introduction: Heterodoxy and Early Modern Theater . 1 Chapter One: “Frequented by Puritans and Papists”: Heterodox Audiences . 23 Chapter Two: Religious Polemic from Print into Plays . 64 Chapter Three: Martyr Acts: Playing with Foxe’s Martyrs on the Public Stage .
    [Show full text]
  • Collaboration and Authorial Community in the Early Modern Theater Lacey Ann Conley Loyola University Chicago
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2012 The rC ew / of Common Playwrights: Collaboration and Authorial Community in the Early Modern Theater Lacey Ann Conley Loyola University Chicago Recommended Citation Conley, Lacey Ann, "The rC ew / of Common Playwrights: Collaboration and Authorial Community in the Early Modern Theater" (2012). Dissertations. Paper 299. http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/299 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2012 Lacey Ann Conley LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO “THE CREW / OF COMMON PLAYWRIGHTS” COLLABORATION AND AUTHORIAL COMMUNITY IN THE EARLY MODERN THEATER A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN ENGLISH BY LACEY ANN CONLEY CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MAY 2012 Copyright by Lacey Ann Conley, 2012 All rights reserved ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In the process of completing this dissertation, I have come to understand the many ways collaboration can occur in the creation of a written work, both in the early modern theater and, more importantly, in my own community. It is to those who made this seem a less solitary endeavor that I would like to express my thanks. I am grateful to the manuscript staff at the British Library for allowing me to have the most exciting scholarly experience of my life thus far, and to the English department at Loyola for creating a space wherein it is pleasant to be a graduate student.
    [Show full text]
  • “Here Lay My Hope”: Attribution, Collaboration
    “HERE LAY MY HOPE”: ATTRIBUTION, COLLABORATION, AND THE AUTHORSHIP OF THE THIRD ADDITION TO THE SPANISH TRAGEDY Keegan Cooper Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Department of English, Indiana University October 2016 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Master’s Thesis Committee ______________________________________ Dr. Terri Bourus, Chair ______________________________________ Dr. Jonathan Eller ______________________________________ Dr. April Witt ii Dedication For Mom, who first introduced me to Shakespeare and inspired me to imagine and create. For Char, Beeg, and Pops. Without your company and counsel, this thesis might not have been completed. iii Acknowledgements A huge thank you to my thesis committee: Dr. Jonathan Eller and Dr. April Witt. Your feedback in and out of class has been vital these past few years. And I cannot thank my mentors enough: my thesis chair, Dr. Terri Bourus, and Dr. Gary Taylor. Without your support and guidance over the past three years, I would not have been able to finish my educational career as successfully as I have. (And thanks for employing me too!) iv Table of Contents Introduction 1 Part 1: Backstory 3 Part 2: Control Tests 19 First Segment 25 Second Segment 42 Part 3: Conclusion 50 Bibliography 52 Curriculum Vitae v Introduction The authorship of the five additions to Thomas Kyd’s The Spanish Tragedy remains a conundrum. Ben Jonson was first thought responsible, but a majority of scholars argue against his involvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Playing Companies and Commerce in Shakespeare’S Time Roslyn Lander Knutson Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 0521772427 - Playing Companies and Commerce in Shakespeare’s Time Roslyn Lander Knutson Index More information Index Adam Bell (possible play subject), 174 n.47 doubling, 83±96, 88 (chart), 141 A Larum for London, 69, 70, 162 n.50 publication, 69, 70, 72, 162 n.50 Admiral's Men, 2±3, 6, 10, 15, 22, 30, 32, 33, Apologetical Dialogue, see Poetaster 34±5,38,110,115,135 Apology for Actors, 119 companies playing together, 39±41, 43±5 ``Arcadian Virgin,'' 54 competition, cross-company, 19, 36±7, Archer, Francis (playlist), 76, 171 n.9 53±4,61±3,67,101,123±4 Archer, Ian W., 42±3, 47 repertory, 49±52, 52±3, 54, 56±63, 129, Armin, Robert (player), 22, 26, 32, 71 131±3, 138±9, 145, 147 ``Arraignment of London,'' see ``Bellman of sale of playbooks, 69±72 London'' see also rivalry, Admiral's Men vs. ``As Merry as May Be,'' 52 Chamberlain's Men As You Like It, 56, 71, 162 n.50 ``Agamemnon,'' 54 Atheist's Tragedy,175n.57 ``Albere Galles,'' 52 Attewell, George (player), 30, 61 ``Alexander and Lodowick,'' 45, 138 audiences, 9, 11, 18±9, 55±6, 63, 99±100, ``Alice Pierce,'' 157 n.70 101, 129±30, 140±1, 169 n.63 All Fools,98,129 Augustine, William (player), 27, 32 ``All is not Gold that Glisters,'' 54 All's Well That Ends Well,71 ``bad'' quartos, 15, 106±7, 110, 111±12 Allen, Giles, 36 Barley, William (stationer), 64±5 Alleyn, Edward (player), 1±3, 13, 14, 25, 27, Barnes, Barnabe, 80 30,34,35,36,38,39±40,41,65,68,154 Barroll, J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crew / of Common Playwrights: Collaboration and Authorial Community in the Early Modern Theater
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2012 The Crew / of Common Playwrights: Collaboration and Authorial Community in the Early Modern Theater Lacey Ann Conley Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Conley, Lacey Ann, "The Crew / of Common Playwrights: Collaboration and Authorial Community in the Early Modern Theater" (2012). Dissertations. 299. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/299 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 2012 Lacey Ann Conley LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO “THE CREW / OF COMMON PLAYWRIGHTS” COLLABORATION AND AUTHORIAL COMMUNITY IN THE EARLY MODERN THEATER A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN ENGLISH BY LACEY ANN CONLEY CHICAGO, ILLINOIS MAY 2012 Copyright by Lacey Ann Conley, 2012 All rights reserved ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In the process of completing this dissertation, I have come to understand the many ways collaboration can occur in the creation of a written work, both in the early modern theater and, more importantly, in my own community. It is to those who made this seem a less solitary endeavor that I would like to express my thanks. I am grateful to the manuscript staff at the British Library for allowing me to have the most exciting scholarly experience of my life thus far, and to the English department at Loyola for creating a space wherein it is pleasant to be a graduate student.
    [Show full text]