DOCSLIB.ORG

Road Report of the LOGMOS Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Road Report of the LOGMOS Master Plan Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea II ENPI 2011 / 264 459 Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea II in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan LOGMOS Master Plan – Annex 5 Road Sector Overview September 2014 This project is funded by A project implemented by the European Union Egis International / Dornier Consulting Master Plan Annex 5 Page 1 of 120 Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea II TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 5 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 13 1.1 CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................................... 13 1.2 CONTENT OF THE REPORT ............................................................................................................. 13 2 ROAD SECTOR ORGANISATION: INSTITUTIONAL SETTINGS AND POLICY ............................ 15 2.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 15 2.2 ROAD SECTOR ORGANISATION IN CENTRAL ASIA ............................................................................. 15 2.2.1 Kazakhstan ....................................................................................................................... 15 2.2.2 Kyrgyzstan ........................................................................................................................ 17 2.2.3 Tajikistan ........................................................................................................................... 19 2.2.4 Turkmenistan .................................................................................................................... 20 2.2.5 Uzbekistan ........................................................................................................................ 20 2.3 ROAD SECTOR ORGANISATION IN SOUTH CAUCASUS ....................................................................... 22 2.3.1 Azerbaijan ......................................................................................................................... 23 2.3.2 Georgia ............................................................................................................................. 24 2.4 ROAD SECTOR ORGANISATION IN MOLDOVA AND UKRAINE ............................................................... 25 2.4.1 Moldova............................................................................................................................. 25 2.4.2 Ukraine .............................................................................................................................. 27 2.5 CONCLUSIONS – SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ......................................................................................... 28 3 ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE PROJECT AREA ..................................................................... 30 3.1 REGIONAL LEVEL ........................................................................................................................... 30 3.1.1 General ............................................................................................................................. 30 3.1.2 TRACECA Road Network in the Project Area .................................................................. 34 3.1.3 Pan-European corridors .................................................................................................... 38 3.1.4 E-road Network ................................................................................................................. 41 3.1.5 Asian Highways ................................................................................................................ 41 3.1.6 CAREC corridors .............................................................................................................. 42 3.1.7 TRACECA Roads, AH, CAREC and Pan-European Corridors ........................................ 50 3.2 ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE IN CENTRAL ASIA ...................................................................................... 51 3.2.1 Kazakhstan ....................................................................................................................... 51 Present Situation of the Road Network in Kazakhstan ........................................................ 51 Main Road Corridors in Kazakhstan (TRACECA, AH, CAREC) .......................................... 53 Main Road Development Projects on TRACECA Roads in Kazakhstan ............................. 57 3.2.2 Kyrgyzstan ........................................................................................................................ 59 Present Situation of the Road Network in Kyrgyzstan ......................................................... 59 Main Road Corridors in Kyrgyzstan (TRACECA, AH, CAREC) ........................................... 60 Main Road Development Projects on TRACECA Roads in Kyrgyzstan .............................. 64 3.2.3 Tajikistan ........................................................................................................................... 66 Present Situation of the Road Network in Tajikistan ............................................................ 66 Main Road Corridors in Tajikistan (TRACECA, AH, CAREC) .............................................. 67 Main Road Development Projects on TRACECA Roads in Tajikistan ................................. 71 3.2.4 Turkmenistan .................................................................................................................... 72 Present Situation of the Road Network in Turkmenistan ..................................................... 72 Main Road Corridors in Turkmenistan (TRACECA, AH, CAREC) ....................................... 74 Main Road Development Projects on TRACECA Roads in Turkmenistan .......................... 77 Master Plan Annex 5 Page 1 of 171 Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea II 3.2.5 Uzbekistan ........................................................................................................................ 78 Present Situation of the Road Network in Uzbekistan ......................................................... 78 Main Road Corridors in Uzbekistan (TRACECA, AH, CAREC) ........................................... 79 Main Road Development Projects on TRACECA Roads in Uzbekistan .............................. 83 3.3 ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE IN SOUTH CAUCASUS ................................................................................ 84 3.3.1 Armenia ............................................................................................................................. 84 Present Situation of the Road Network in Armenia .............................................................. 84 Main Road Corridors in Armenia (TRACECA, AH) .............................................................. 86 Main Road Development Projects on TRACECA Roads in Armenia ................................... 90 3.3.2 Azerbaijan ......................................................................................................................... 91 Present Situation of the Road Network in Azerbaijan .......................................................... 91 Main Road Corridors in Azerbaijan (TRACECA, AH, CAREC) ............................................ 92 Main Road Development Projects on TRACECA Roads in Azerbaijan ............................... 96 3.3.3 Georgia ............................................................................................................................. 97 Present Situation of the Road Network in Georgia .............................................................. 97 Main Road Corridors in Georgia (TRACECA, AH) ............................................................... 98 Main Road Development Projects on TRACECA Roads in Georgia ................................. 102 3.4 ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE IN MOLDOVA & UKRAINE ......................................................................... 103 3.4.1 Moldova........................................................................................................................... 103 Present Situation of the Road Network in Moldova............................................................ 103 Main Road Corridors in Moldova ........................................................................................ 105 Main Road Development Projects on TRACECA Roads in Moldova ................................ 108 3.4.2 Ukraine ............................................................................................................................ 109 Present Situation of the Road Network in Ukraine ............................................................. 109 Main Road Corridors in Ukraine (TRACECA, Pan-European) ........................................... 111 Main Road Development Projects on TRACECA Roads in Ukraine .................................. 114 3.5 SUMMARY FOR THE PROJECT AREA .............................................................................................. 114 4 TRAFFIC ON TRACECA ROADS IN THE PROJECT AREA ......................................................... 117 4.1 ROAD TRANSPORT VOLUMES IN COUNTRIES OF THE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The World Bank Rural Infrastructure in Armenia
    30312 Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Rural Infrastructure in Armenia: Addressing Gaps in Service Delivery Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Infrastructure and Energy Services Department Europe and Central Asia Region 1st September 2004 FINAL REPORT: 1st September 2004 Disclaimer: This paper is published to communicate the results of the Bank’s work to the development community with minimum delay. The typescript of this paper, therefore, has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formal printed texts and the World Bank accepts no responsibility for errors. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank cannot guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply on the part of the World Bank any judgment of the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. © 2004 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), The World Bank. ii FINAL REPORT: 1st September 2004 CONTENTS Abbreviations And Acronyms vi Acknowledgments vii Overview and Summary of Recommendations 1 Introduction 5 Why did we do this Study?........................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Sustainability of Road Management and Financing in Azerbaijan
    Report No. 66532-AZ Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized IMPROVING THE SUSTAINABILITY OF ROAD MANAGEMENT AND FINANCING IN AZERBAIJAN Public Disclosure Authorized OCTOBER 13, 2011 THE WORLD BANK Public Disclosure Authorized WASHINGTON, D.C. Abbreviations and Acronyms AADT Average Annual Daily Traffic AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ADB Asian Development Bank ARS AzerRoadService BOT Build-Operate-Transfer BRMAC Baku Road Maintenance and Advertisement Company EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development ECA Europe and Central Asia EU European Union FIDIC International Federation of Consulting Engineers FWD Falling Weight Deflectometer GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GDP Gross Domestic Product GOA Government of Azerbaijan HDM-4 Highway Development and Management Model IDA International Development Agency IFI International Financial Institution IT Information Technology JSC Joint-Stock Company KM Kilometer M Roads Major Arterial roads MoED Ministry of Economic Development MOT Ministry of Transport NCC National Construction Council NTCC National Traffic Control Centre OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development O & M Operations and Maintenance PPP Public Private Partnership R Roads Minor Arterial Roads RAMS Road Asset Management System RMU Road Maintenance Unit RONET Road Network Evaluation Tools Model RTSD Road Transport Services Department SOFAZ State Oil Fund TRACECA Transport Corridor Europe-Caucasus-Asia UK United Kingdom
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Multitranche Financing Facility Republic of Azerbaijan: Road Network Development Investment Program Tranche I: Southern Road Corridor Improvement
    Environmental Assessment Report Summary Environmental Impact Assessment Project Number: 39176 January 2007 Proposed Multitranche Financing Facility Republic of Azerbaijan: Road Network Development Investment Program Tranche I: Southern Road Corridor Improvement Prepared by the Road Transport Service Department for the Asian Development Bank. The summary environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. The views expressed herein are those of the consultant and do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s members, Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. 2 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 2 January 2007) Currency Unit – Azerbaijan New Manat/s (AZM) AZM1.00 = $1.14 $1.00 = AZM0.87 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank DRMU – District Road Maintenance Unit EA – executing agency EIA – environmental impact assessment EMP – environmental management plan ESS – Ecology and Safety Sector IEE – initial environmental examination MENR – Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources MFF – multitranche financing facility NOx – nitrogen oxides PPTA – project preparatory technical assistance ROW – right-of-way RRI – Rhein Ruhr International RTSD – Road Transport Service Department SEIA – summary environmental impact assessment SOx – sulphur oxides TERA – TERA International Group, Inc. UNESCO – United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization WHO – World Health Organization WEIGHTS AND MEASURES C – centigrade m2 – square meter mm – millimeter vpd – vehicles per day CONTENTS MAP I. Introduction 1 II. Description of the Project 3 IIII. Description of the Environment 11 A. Physical Resources 11 B. Ecological and Biological Environment 13 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives
    WIND ENERGY IN ARMENIA: OVERVIEW OF POTENTIAL AND DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES ASSISTANCE TO ENERGY SECTOR TO STRENGTHEN ENERGY SECURITY AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONTRACT NUMBER EPP-I-08-03-00008-00 MARCH 2010 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by PA Government Services Inc. Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives ASSISTANCE TO ENERGY SECTOR TO STRENGTHEN ENERGY SECURITY AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONTRACT NUMBER EPP-I-08-03-00008-00 The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives ASSISTANCE TO ENERGY SECTOR TO STRENGTHEN ENERGY SECURITY AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONTRACT NUMBER EPP-I-08-03-00008-00 March 2010 © PA Consulting Group 2010 Prepared for: United States Agency for PA Government Services Inc. International Development 4601 N. Fairfax Drive Armenia Mission Suite 600 1 American Ave. Arlington, VA 22203 Yerevan 0082 Armenia Prepared by: PA Government Services Inc. Tel: +1 571 227 9000 Fax: +1 571 227 9001 www.paconsulting.com Version: 1.0 Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of potential and development perspectives. March 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Summary 1-1 2. Introduction 2-1 2.1 International Trends 2-1 2.2 State of the energy sector in Armenia 2-3 3. Wind Studies 3-1 4. Wind Measurements 4-1 5. Wind Energy Potential 5-1 6. Development perspectives 6-1 6.1 Technical limitations 6-1 6.2 Perspective Sites 6-3 6.3 Grid Interconnection 6-8 6.4 Economic Limitations 6-11 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Personnel Management (Opm)
    Friday April 25, 1997 Part XXXVI Office of Personnel Management Semiannual Regulatory Agenda federal register 22499 VerDate 14-MAR-97 10:08 Apr 25, 1997 Jkt 173997 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\ADV88.034 25ap34 22500 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 80 / Friday, April 25, 1997 / Unified Agenda OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT (OPM) OPM OFFICE OF PERSONNEL SUMMARY: The following Office of binding obligation on the Office of MANAGEMENT Personnel Management (OPM) Personnel Management with regard to regulations are scheduled for any specific item on the agenda. 5 CFR Ch. I development or review from April 1, Additional regulatory action is not 1997, through March 31, 1998. This precluded. agenda carries out OPM's Semiannual Regulatory Agenda responsibilities to publish a semiannual FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: AGENCY: Office of Personnel agenda under E.O. 12866 ``Regulatory Jacquline D. Carter, (202) 606-1973. Management. Planning and Review'' and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. Office of Personnel Management. ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda. chapter 6). This publication in the James B. King, Federal Register does not impose a Director. Prerule Stage Sequence Regulation Title Identifier Number Number 3646 Availability of Official Information ................................................................................................................................... 3206-AG92 Proposed Rule Stage Regulation Sequence Title Identifier Number Number 3647 Appointment of Noncitizens in the Excepted Service ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Azerbaijan Systematic Country Diagnostic
    Public Disclosure Authorized AZERBAIJAN Public Disclosure Authorized SYSTEMATIC COUNTRY DIAGNOSTIC South Caucasus Country Public Disclosure Authorized Management Unit (ECCU3) Europe and Central Asia June 3, 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized i DOCUMENT OF THE WORLD BANK GROUP FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Azerbaijan Systematic Country Diagnostic June 3, 2015 South Caucasus Country Management Unit (ECCU3) Europe and Central Asia Region This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. ii CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective January 12, 2015) Currency Unit = AZN AZN 0.78 = US$1 FISCAL YEAR [January 1 – December 31] ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ACG Azeri–Chirag–Guneshli PI Permanent Income BEEPS Business Environment and Enterprise POS Points of Service Performance Surveys CBAR Central Bank of the Republic of Azerbaijan PISA Program for International Student Assessment CSO Civil society organization PEFA Public expenditure and financial accountability CCC Commission on Combating Corruption PFM Public financial management CPF Country Partnership Framework PIM Public investment management ECA Europe and Central Asia REER Real Effective Exchange Rate EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and R&D Research and development Development EFTA European Free Trade Association RAI Rural Access Index EU European Union STEPS Skills Towards Employment and Productivity Survey EITI Extractive Industries Transparency
    [Show full text]
  • Dating of Remains of Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens from Anatolian Region by ESR-US Combined Methods: Preliminary Results
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC & TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH VOLUME 5, ISSUE 05, MAY 2016 ISSN 2277-8616 Dating Of Remains Of Neanderthals And Homo Sapiens From Anatolian Region By ESR-US Combined Methods: Preliminary Results Samer Farkh, Abdallah Zaiour, Ahmad Chamseddine, Zeinab Matar, Samir Farkh, Jamal Charara, Ghayas Lakis, Bilal Houshaymi, Alaa Hamze, Sabine Azoury Abstract: We tried in the present study to apply the electron spin resonance method (ESR) combined with uranium-series method (US), for dating fossilized human teeth and found valuable archaeological sites such as Karain Cave in Anatolia. Karain Cave is a crucial site in a region that has yielded remains of Neanderthals and Homo sapiens, our direct ancestors. The dating of these remains allowed us to trace the history, since the presence of man on earth. Indeed, Anatolia in Turkey is an important region of the world because it represents a passage between Africa, the Middle East and Europe. Our study was conducted on faunal teeth found near human remains. The combination of ESR and US data on the teeth provides an understanding of their complex geochemical evolution and get better estimated results. Our samples were taken from the central cutting where geological layers are divided into archaeological horizons each 10 cm. The AH4 horizon of I.3 layer, which represents the boundary between the Middle Paleolithic and Upper Paleolithic, is dated to 29 ± 4 ka by the ESR-US model. Below, two horizons AH6 and AH8 in the same layer I.4 are dated respectively 40 ± 6 and 45 ± 7 ka using the ESR-US model.
    [Show full text]
  • Delivery Destinations
    Delivery Destinations 50 - 2,000 kg 2,001 - 3,000 kg 3,001 - 10,000 kg 10,000 - 24,000 kg over 24,000 kg (vol. 1 - 12 m3) (vol. 12 - 16 m3) (vol. 16 - 33 m3) (vol. 33 - 82 m3) (vol. 83 m3 and above) District Province/States Andijan region Andijan district Andijan region Asaka district Andijan region Balikchi district Andijan region Bulokboshi district Andijan region Buz district Andijan region Djalakuduk district Andijan region Izoboksan district Andijan region Korasuv city Andijan region Markhamat district Andijan region Oltinkul district Andijan region Pakhtaobod district Andijan region Khdjaobod district Andijan region Ulugnor district Andijan region Shakhrikhon district Andijan region Kurgontepa district Andijan region Andijan City Andijan region Khanabad City Bukhara region Bukhara district Bukhara region Vobkent district Bukhara region Jandar district Bukhara region Kagan district Bukhara region Olot district Bukhara region Peshkul district Bukhara region Romitan district Bukhara region Shofirkhon district Bukhara region Qoraqul district Bukhara region Gijduvan district Bukhara region Qoravul bazar district Bukhara region Kagan City Bukhara region Bukhara City Jizzakh region Arnasoy district Jizzakh region Bakhmal district Jizzakh region Galloaral district Jizzakh region Sh. Rashidov district Jizzakh region Dostlik district Jizzakh region Zomin district Jizzakh region Mirzachul district Jizzakh region Zafarabad district Jizzakh region Pakhtakor district Jizzakh region Forish district Jizzakh region Yangiabad district Jizzakh region
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Ministry of Agriculture and Uzbekistan Agroindustry and Food Security Agency (UZAIFSA) Public Disclosure Authorized Uzbekistan Agriculture Modernization Project Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Tashkent, Uzbekistan December, 2019 ABBREVIATIONS AND GLOSSARY ARAP Abbreviated Resettlement Action Plan CC Civil Code DCM Decree of the Cabinet of Ministries DDR Diligence Report DMS Detailed Measurement Survey DSEI Draft Statement of the Environmental Impact EHS Environment, Health and Safety General Guidelines EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ES Environmental Specialist ESA Environmental and Social Assessment ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ESMF Environmental and Social Management Framework ESMP Environmental and Social Management Plan FS Feasibility Study GoU Government of Uzbekistan GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism H&S Health and Safety HH Household ICWC Integrated Commission for Water Coordination IFIs International Financial Institutions IP Indigenous People IR Involuntary Resettlement LAR Land Acquisition and Resettlement LC Land Code MCA Makhalla Citizen’s Assembly MoEI Ministry of Economy and Industry MoH Ministry of Health NGO Non-governmental organization OHS Occupational and Health and Safety ОP Operational Policy PAP Project Affected Persons PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyl PCR Physical Cultural Resources PIU Project Implementation Unit POM Project Operational Manual PPE Personal Protective Equipment QE Qishloq Engineer
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Ice: the Role of Civil
    The failure of the 2009 Protocols to establish and develop diplomatic relations between Armenia and Turkey has largely overshadowed the success of civil society organizations in advancing the normalization process over the past decade. This report aims to help address this imbalance through a detailed account Breaking the Ice: of the United States Department of State-funded “Dialogue-Building between Turkey and Armenia” project, implemented by the Global Political Trends Center (GPoT) of Istanbul Kültür University, Internews Network, Internews Armenia, the Yerevan Press Club and CAM Film between September 2010 and December 2011. The Role of Civil Society and Media in Including an introduction that analyzes the current “frozen” state and historical background of Turkish- Armenian relations, Breaking the Ice: The Role of Civil Society and Media in Turkey-Armenia Relations presents the writings and reflections of the dozens of Turkish and Armenian journalists and students who participated in the project. The output of the Dialogue-Building Project demonstrates the continued, if not Turkey-Armenia Relations heightened, importance of civil society and media-based initiatives in the Turkey-Armenia normalization process, post-Protocols. Susae Elanchenny & Narod Maraşlıyan Since its founding in 2008, GPoT Center has played an active role in rapprochement and reconciliation projects between Turkey and Armenia through organizing numerous exchanges, roundtable discussions and conferences with the participation of leading Turkish civil society activists, academics, journalists and retired diplomats. For more information on these projects and GPoT Center, please visit www.gpotcenter.org. ISBN: 978-605-4233-80-9 Breaking the Ice: The Role of Civil Society and Media in Turkey-Armenia Relations An Evaluation of the “Dialogue-Building between Turkey and Armenia” Project Susae Elanchenny & Narod Maraşlıyan April 2012 BREAKING THE ICE: THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOcietY anD MEDia IN TUrkeY-Armenia RELatiOns Istanbul Kültür University Publication No.
    [Show full text]
  • “Tashkent's Reforms Have Not
    “TASHKENT’S REFORMS HAVE NOT YET REACHED US” UNFINISHED WORK IN THE FIGHT AGAINST FORCED LABOR IN UZBEKISTAN’S 2019 COTTON HARVEST “TASHKENT’S REFORMS HAVE NOT YET REACHED US” UNFINISHED WORK IN THE FIGHT AGAINST FORCED LABOR IN UZBEKISTAN’S 2019 COTTON HARVEST 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 KEY FINDINGS FROM THE 2019 HARVEST 6 METHODOLOGY 8 TABLE 1: PARTICIPATION IN THE COTTON HARVEST 10 POSITIVE TRENDS 12 FORCED LABOR LINKED TO GOVERNMENT POLICIES AND CONTROL 13 MAIN RECRUITMENT CHANNELS FOR COTTON PICKERS: 15 TABLE 2: PERCEPTION OF PENALTY FOR REFUSING TO PICK COTTON ACCORDING TO WHO RECRUITED RESPONDENTS 16 TABLE 3: WORKING CONDITIONS FOR PICKERS ACCORDING TO HOW THEY WERE RECRUITED TO PICK COTTON 16 TABLE 4: PERCEPTION OF COERCION BY RECRUITMENT METHODS 17 LACK OF FAIR AND EFFECTIVE RECRUITMENT SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURAL LABOR SHORTAGES 18 STRUCTURAL LABOR SHORTAGES 18 LACK OF FAIR AND EFFECTIVE RECRUITMENT SYSTEMS 18 FORCED LABOR MOBILIZATION 21 1. ABILITY TO REFUSE TO PICK COTTON 21 TABLE 5: ABILITY TO REFUSE TO PICK COTTON 21 TABLE 6: RESPONDENTS’ ABILITY TO REFUSE TO PICK COTTON ACCORDING TO HOW THEY WERE RECRUITED 22 2. MENACE OF PENALTY 22 TABLE 7: PENALTIES FOR REFUSAL 22 TABLE 8: PERCEIVED PENALTIES FOR REFUSAL TO PICK COTTON BY PROFESSION 23 3. REPLACEMENT FEES/EXTORTION 23 TABLE 9: FEES TO AVOID COTTON PICKING 23 CHART 1: PAYMENT OF FEES BY REGION 24 OFFICIALS FORCIBLY MOBILIZED LABOR FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE HARVEST TO MEET LABOR SHORTAGES 24 LAW ENFORCEMENT, MILITARY, AND EMERGENCIES PERSONNEL 24 PUBLIC UTILITIES
    [Show full text]
  • Athens County Communities
    51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 C GM JOHNSON C GM JOHNSON D HILL-BUCHTEL RD y R ODNR RD Sunda 33 W L O CARBON L A L U D O E H R A E B A K OLD A AR 278 DU SW O WATERWORKS HILL RD M C RD A P N K S RD BUCHTEL T-624A R D 13 T-622 D HOCKING COUNTY D KL 78 R Creek N A EY T N 31 E D O DR S T-35 O W HOCKING COUNTY R T N ILLIAMS ST ATHENS COUNTY W S H S U O Y J RD GLOUSTER CEMETERY O Sunday ATHENS COUNTY C J DEW T BUCHTEL UNITED H A 5 O EDWARDS ST CEMETERY S CEMETERY T-315 M 7 H K METHODIST CHURCH R 6 A O M C N I K D R W R R D E E M Y R AMO N D E O E I I CONNER M D o W D W E L E V n N P ST S O T-567 FRANK ST R T BESSEMER RDELM ST S L F d A B L ELM T B S A N T B T RD R K a W LOVE T T O A S y M V r E A S V ANKLI T R N T-675 I F S a 78 Y T-22 A T-1276 T SYCAMORE ST A R O A PINE ST EA T-1276 R n O D T L IETTA c L GROVER DOVER T P 685 h A WHITMORE T-22 S K GROVER ST T Nelsonville LID E AV EUC A D D FAIRVIEWSCOS V GROVE DR ST VERITY ST FR-3 u A V R D - York n COLLEGE ST RD L A O P E d E N I R DOVER VILLAGE OF GLOUSTER a G N CROSS ST y S R E E DR BUCHTEL MOUND R LAN Nelsonville - York H Buchtel MAYOR’S C R W O O D Park DIAMOND O AV r ST U V E Nelsonville Community OFFICE IO E E H T N Park C O D Y 33B BRICK RD R T-22A S R E C W ST D T K TWELFTH ST DR ST BUCK E E S YE WATERLOO r C B BUCHTEL e A D APARTMENTS N EARL ST OAK ST OAK MILL ST Wayne National Forest TRIMBLSYLVANIAE AV BROAD T-1305 U K PINE GROVE PINE H C e C ELIZABETH MT ST MARY DR B ST MARY OF RD T EMBRY ST GLOUSTER FORT ST FORT k ADAMS
    [Show full text]