Azerbaijan Systematic Country Diagnostic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Azerbaijan Systematic Country Diagnostic Public Disclosure Authorized AZERBAIJAN Public Disclosure Authorized SYSTEMATIC COUNTRY DIAGNOSTIC South Caucasus Country Public Disclosure Authorized Management Unit (ECCU3) Europe and Central Asia June 3, 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized i DOCUMENT OF THE WORLD BANK GROUP FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Azerbaijan Systematic Country Diagnostic June 3, 2015 South Caucasus Country Management Unit (ECCU3) Europe and Central Asia Region This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World Bank authorization. ii CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective January 12, 2015) Currency Unit = AZN AZN 0.78 = US$1 FISCAL YEAR [January 1 – December 31] ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ACG Azeri–Chirag–Guneshli PI Permanent Income BEEPS Business Environment and Enterprise POS Points of Service Performance Surveys CBAR Central Bank of the Republic of Azerbaijan PISA Program for International Student Assessment CSO Civil society organization PEFA Public expenditure and financial accountability CCC Commission on Combating Corruption PFM Public financial management CPF Country Partnership Framework PIM Public investment management ECA Europe and Central Asia REER Real Effective Exchange Rate EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and R&D Research and development Development EFTA European Free Trade Association RAI Rural Access Index EU European Union STEPS Skills Towards Employment and Productivity Survey EITI Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative SOFAZ State Oil Fund of Azerbaijan HBS Household Budget Survey SOE State-owned enterprise IDP Internally Displaced Person SCD Systematic Country Diagnostic IAB International Bank of Azerbaijan TFP Total factor productivity LFS Labor Force Survey TIMSS Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study LiTs Life in Transition Survey UNECE United Nations Economic Commission for Europe LPI Logistics Performance Indicator UMIC Upper-middle income country MSME Micro Small and Medium Enterprises WUA Water Users Association NCD Non-communicable disease WBG World Bank Group OBI Open Budget Index WDI World Development Indicators OGP Open Government Partnership WGI World Governance Indicators Regional Vice President: Laura Tuck Country Director: Henry G. R. Kerali Senior Directors: Ana Revenga/Marcelo Giugale Practice Managers: Carolina Sanchez-Paramo/ Ivailo Izvorski Task Team Leaders: Luis F. Lopez-Calva/Rashmi Shankar iii Acknowledgements The Azerbaijan SCD has been prepared by a team led by Luis F. Lopez-Calva and Rashmi Shankar, under the guidance of Carolina Sanchez-Paramo (Practice Manager), Miria Pigato (current Practice Manager), Larisa Leshchenko (Country Manager) and Ivailo V. Izvorski (former Practice Manager). The core team included (in alphabetical order) Saida Bagirli, Kimberly Blair Bolch, Dandan Chen, Ahmed A. R. Eiweida, Kimberly D. Johns, Samantha Lach, Moritz Meyer, Georgiana Pop, Mona Prasad, Angela Prigozhina, Nadir Ramazanov, Nistha Sinha and Congyan Tan. The preparation of the SCD benefitted from discussions held in the country team SCD launch workshop in Baku, country team consultations in December, and three rounds of consultations with government, think-tanks, donors, and CSOs. Inputs and comments from the country team were prepared by Aly Zulficar Rahim, Mustapha Benmaamar, Hadji Huseynov, Rufiz Chiraghzade, Elvira Anadolu, Eavan O’ Halloran, David Meerbach, Sachiko Kataoka, Sandra Sargent, Gulana Enar Hajiyeva, Carla Pittalis, Adriana Jordanova, Craig Meisner, Siddharth Sharma, Angela Prigozhina, Iuliia Mironova, Aliya Azimova, Qahir Dhanani, Nijat Valiyev, and Sadig Aliyev. The team also benefitted from comments received in a presentation to the SCD Advisory Group, and peer reviewers Donato De Rosa, Marcelo Selowsky, Tara Vishwanath and Christos Kostopulos, as well as Ana Revenga, Ambar Narayan, David Bernstein, and Jose Guilherme Reis. iv Azerbaijan Systematic Country Diagnostic Tables of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 14 1.1 Motivation .................................................................................................................. 14 1.2 How has Azerbaijan fared in terms of poverty reduction and shared prosperity? ................ 15 1.3 The Top-Down/Bottom-Up Assets Framework ............................................................... 22 2 Drivers of historical progress and risks to sustainability ................................................................ 27 2.1 What has been driving progress toward the twin goals historically? ....................................... 27 2.2 How sustainable is this progress fiscally, socially, and environmentally? ............................... 34 3 The top-down story: Challenges and constraints for ensuring sustainable growth ........................ 45 3.1 Challenge 1: The Strategic Use of Oil Rents for Asset Diversification............................... 47 3.2 Challenge 2: Unleashing productivity growth for greater economic competitiveness .......... 76 4 The bottom-up story: Challenges and constraints for ensuring sustainable inclusive growth ....... 89 4.1 Challenge 1: Accumulation of a diversified asset base at the household level ......................... 89 4.2 Challenge 2: Enhancing opportunities for households use assets more intensively .................. 98 5 Prioritization: Key binding constraints .......................................................................................... 109 References ........................................................................................................................................... 120 Annexes ............................................................................................................................................... 122 Table of figures Figure 1: Poverty headcount rate at the national poverty rate in Azerbaijan, 2001-2013 ........................ 16 Figure 2: Evolution of GDP per capita ............................................................................................. 16 Figure 3: Poverty shows a clear divide between urban and rural areas, 2012 ........................................ 17 Figure 4: Share of IDPs within welfare groups, 2012 ........................................................................ 17 Figure 5: Regional poverty rates in Azerbaijan: 2005, 2007 and 2012 ................................................. 17 Figure 6: Output per capita grows in the regions as well, though still a fraction of Baku’s .................... 18 Figure 7: Share of the population by welfare group, 2007-2012 .......................................................... 19 Figure 8: Share of population belonging to the national bottom 40 by region, 2012. ............................. 20 Figure 9: Growth incidence curve 2007-2012 ................................................................................... 20 Figure 10: Growth in mean consumption and consumption of the bottom 40 ....................................... 22 Figure 11: GDP growth is key for the achievements, but the relation is not one-to-one and there is great heterogeneity across ECA countries ................................................................................................ 22 v Figure 12: Azerbaijan performs well on shared prosperity, but below other resource-rich countries in the region ........................................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 13: The Top-Down / Bottom-Up Asset Framework ................................................................ 24 Figure 14: Increases in oil production prices .................................................................................... 27 Figure 15: Increases in per capita income growth .............................................................................. 27 Figure 16: Oil Fund reserves as percent of GDP ............................................................................... 28 Figure 17: Share of Oil in Total Goods Exports ................................................................................ 28 Figure 18: Consolidated budget expenditures ................................................................................... 29 Figure 19: Consolidated budget expenditures as a percentage of GDP ................................................ 29 Figure 20: Public investment growth ............................................................................................... 29 Figure 21: Non-oil fiscal balance benchmarked (latest available year, percentage of GDP) ................... 30 Figure 22: Sectoral composition of GDP .......................................................................................... 30 Figure 23: Decomposition of income poverty reduction ..................................................................... 32 Figure 24: Public sector wages and subsidies ................................................................................... 33 Figure 25: Unemployment rate and the average monthly salary, 2000-2013 ........................................ 33 Figure 26: Income sources at household level by welfare groups (Azerbaijan, 2012). ..........................
Recommended publications
  • Improving the Sustainability of Road Management and Financing in Azerbaijan
    Report No. 66532-AZ Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized IMPROVING THE SUSTAINABILITY OF ROAD MANAGEMENT AND FINANCING IN AZERBAIJAN Public Disclosure Authorized OCTOBER 13, 2011 THE WORLD BANK Public Disclosure Authorized WASHINGTON, D.C. Abbreviations and Acronyms AADT Average Annual Daily Traffic AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ADB Asian Development Bank ARS AzerRoadService BOT Build-Operate-Transfer BRMAC Baku Road Maintenance and Advertisement Company EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development ECA Europe and Central Asia EU European Union FIDIC International Federation of Consulting Engineers FWD Falling Weight Deflectometer GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GDP Gross Domestic Product GOA Government of Azerbaijan HDM-4 Highway Development and Management Model IDA International Development Agency IFI International Financial Institution IT Information Technology JSC Joint-Stock Company KM Kilometer M Roads Major Arterial roads MoED Ministry of Economic Development MOT Ministry of Transport NCC National Construction Council NTCC National Traffic Control Centre OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development O & M Operations and Maintenance PPP Public Private Partnership R Roads Minor Arterial Roads RAMS Road Asset Management System RMU Road Maintenance Unit RONET Road Network Evaluation Tools Model RTSD Road Transport Services Department SOFAZ State Oil Fund TRACECA Transport Corridor Europe-Caucasus-Asia UK United Kingdom
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Multitranche Financing Facility Republic of Azerbaijan: Road Network Development Investment Program Tranche I: Southern Road Corridor Improvement
    Environmental Assessment Report Summary Environmental Impact Assessment Project Number: 39176 January 2007 Proposed Multitranche Financing Facility Republic of Azerbaijan: Road Network Development Investment Program Tranche I: Southern Road Corridor Improvement Prepared by the Road Transport Service Department for the Asian Development Bank. The summary environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. The views expressed herein are those of the consultant and do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s members, Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. 2 CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 2 January 2007) Currency Unit – Azerbaijan New Manat/s (AZM) AZM1.00 = $1.14 $1.00 = AZM0.87 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank DRMU – District Road Maintenance Unit EA – executing agency EIA – environmental impact assessment EMP – environmental management plan ESS – Ecology and Safety Sector IEE – initial environmental examination MENR – Ministry of Ecology and Natural Resources MFF – multitranche financing facility NOx – nitrogen oxides PPTA – project preparatory technical assistance ROW – right-of-way RRI – Rhein Ruhr International RTSD – Road Transport Service Department SEIA – summary environmental impact assessment SOx – sulphur oxides TERA – TERA International Group, Inc. UNESCO – United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization WHO – World Health Organization WEIGHTS AND MEASURES C – centigrade m2 – square meter mm – millimeter vpd – vehicles per day CONTENTS MAP I. Introduction 1 II. Description of the Project 3 IIII. Description of the Environment 11 A. Physical Resources 11 B. Ecological and Biological Environment 13 C.
    [Show full text]
  • A Unified List of Political Prisoners in Azerbaijan
    A UNIFIED LIST OF POLITICAL PRISONERS IN AZERBAIJAN A UNIFIED LIST OF POLITICAL PRISONERS IN AZERBAIJAN Covering the period up to 25 May 2017 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................4 DEFINITION OF POLITICAL PRISONERS...............................................................5 POLITICAL PRISONERS.....................................................................................6-106 A. Journalists/Bloggers......................................................................................6-14 B. Writers/Poets…...........................................................................................15-17 C. Human Rights Defenders............................................................................17-18 D. Political and social Activists ………..........................................................18-31 E. Religious Activists......................................................................................31-79 (1) Members of Muslim Unity Movement and those arrested in Nardaran Settlement...........................................................................31-60 (2) Persons detained in connection with the “Freedom for Hijab” protest held on 5 October 2012.........................60-63 (3) Religious Activists arrested in Masalli in 2012...............................63-65 (4) Religious Activists arrested in May 2012........................................65-69 (5) Chairman of Islamic Party of Azerbaijan and persons arrested
    [Show full text]
  • BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2012 Bp.Com/Caspian
    BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2012 bp.com/caspian Building a stronger, safer BP About our report This report covers the calendar year ending 31 December 2012. In some instances significant events from 2013 have been included. Unless otherwise specified, the text does not distinguish between the activities of BP p.l.c. and those of its subsidiaries and affiliates. References in this report to ‘us’, ‘we’ and ‘our’ relate to BP in Azerbaijan unless otherwise stated. When we cite ‘BP in Azerbaijan’ we refer to operations in Azerbaijan only. If we refer to ‘BP AGT’ we are including all our activities in Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey. Specific references to ‘BP’ and the ‘BP group’ mean BP p.l.c., its subsidiaries and affiliates. All dollar amounts are in US dollars. The report is issued annually by BP Exploration (Caspian Sea) Limited in its capacities as operator and manager of the joint operating company for the Azeri-Chirag-Deepwater Gunashli field, as manager of The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline Company and by BP Exploration (Shah Deniz) Limited in its capacities as operator of the Shah Deniz field and as technical operator of The South Caucasus Pipeline Company. For this report each of these entities has provided information relevant to its project and statements applicable to its project. Cautionary statement BP in Azerbaijan Sustainability Report 2012 contains forward-looking statements relating, in particular, to recoverable volumes and resources, capital, operating and other expenditures, and future projects. Actual results may differ from such statements depending on a variety of factors including supply and demand developments, pricing and operational issues and political, legal, fiscal, commercial and social circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2003 EN
    Commissioner for Human Rights (Ombudsman) of the Republic of Azerbaijan The First Annual Report (Brief review) Of the Commissioner for Human Rights (Ombudsman) of the Republic of Azerbaijan On Status of Provision and Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms in Azerbaijan Baku-2003 A number of significant steps have been taken to improve the legislation in the area of human rights and freedoms and for ensuring provision of those rights in the framework of the consistent reforms held in our country in the latest decade. Azerbaijan has assumed diverse obligations before the Council of Europe as a member-state of this organization; and one of its commitments pertained to the adoption of a law on commissioner for human rights (Ombudsman). For this purpose, and as an constituent part and logical continuation of the continuous reforms held in the area of human rights and freedoms in Azerbaijan, a post of Ombudsman was established under the Constitution Law of the Azerbaijan Republic “On Commissioner for Human Rights (Ombudsman) of the Republic of Azerbaijan” adopted by the Milli Majlis (Parliament) of the Azerbaijan Republic on 28 December 2001. In compliance with the Decree of the President of the Azerbaijan Republic on Implementation of this law dated 5 March 2002 certain activities relating to the establishment of the post of Ombudsman were conducted. On 2 July 2002, Elmira Teymur (patronymic) Suleymanova was elected to the post of the first Ombudsman of Azerbaijan Republic. On 2 July 2002, relevant legislative acts were revised and amended in connection with the implementation of the Law on Ombudsman, and provisions concerning Ombudsman institution were included into the Constitution through the referendum held on 24 August 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Azerbaijan Health System Review
    Health Systems in Transition Vol. 12 No. 3 2010 Azerbaijan Health system review Fuad Ibrahimov • Aybaniz Ibrahimova Jenni Kehler • Erica Richardson Erica Richardson (Editor) and Martin McKee (Series editor) were responsible for this HiT profile Editorial Board Editor in chief Elias Mossialos, London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom Series editors Reinhard Busse, Berlin Technical University, Germany Josep Figueras, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Martin McKee, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom Richard Saltman, Emory University, United States Editorial team Sara Allin, University of Toronto, Canada Matthew Gaskins, Berlin Technical University, Germany Cristina Hernández-Quevedo, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Anna Maresso, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies David McDaid, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Sherry Merkur, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Philipa Mladovsky, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Bernd Rechel, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Erica Richardson, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Sarah Thomson, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Ewout van Ginneken, Berlin University of Technology, Germany International advisory board Tit Albreht, Institute of Public Health, Slovenia Carlos Alvarez-Dardet Díaz, University of Alicante, Spain Rifat Atun, Global Fund, Switzerland Johan Calltorp, Nordic School of Public Health,
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Territorial Divisions in Different Historical Periods
    Administrative Department of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan P R E S I D E N T I A L L I B R A R Y TERRITORIAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE UNITS C O N T E N T I. GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................................................................. 3 II. BAKU ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. General background of Baku ............................................................................................................................ 5 2. History of the city of Baku ................................................................................................................................. 7 3. Museums ........................................................................................................................................................... 16 4. Historical Monuments ...................................................................................................................................... 20 The Maiden Tower ............................................................................................................................................ 20 The Shirvanshahs’ Palace ensemble ................................................................................................................ 22 The Sabael Castle .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Consultations on Environmental and Social Framework
    AZERBAIJAN REPUBLIC Public Disclosure Authorized STATE AGENCY OF AZERBAIJAN AUTOMOBILE ROADS Regional Connectivity and Development Project Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized March 2021 ESF Documents Preparation – Preliminary Envıronmental and Socıal Management Plan (PESMP) TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 1 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................... 3 1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Purpose and Scope of ESMP .................................................................................. 4 1.3 Socioeconomic and Environment Overview of Project Area .................................... 5 1.4 Application of the ESMP .......................................................................................... 6 1.5 Revision / Modification of the ESMP ........................................................................ 6 2 INSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK ...................................................... 7 2.1 National Environmental Laws, Regulations, Guidelines, and Standards ................. 7 2.2 National Laws, Regulations and Standards on Environmental, Social Protection and Land Issues ...................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Applicable World
    [Show full text]
  • Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea II
    Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea II ENPI 2011 / 264 459 Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea II Country Profile AZERBAIJAN July 2012 This project is funded by A project implemented by the European Union Egis International / Dornier Consulting Page 1 of XX Inception Report Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea ll TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 5 2 NATIONAL TRANSPORT POLICY ..................................................................................................... 6 3 LEGAL ENVIRONMENT IN THE FIELD OF TRANSPORT ................................................................ 7 4 NATIONAL POLICY AND LEGISLATION IN TRADE AND TRANSIT ............................................. 10 5 INVESTMENTS IN TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS SECTOR IN AZERBAIJAN ............................ 11 6 STRATEGIC CHALLENGES ............................................................................................................. 13 6.1 MARKET CHALLENGES ................................................................................................................... 13 6.1.1 National Trade: Exports and Imports ................................................................................ 13 6.1.2 Regional TRACECA Trade ............................................................................................... 17 6.2 INTERMODAL MARITIME BASED TRANSPORT CHALLENGES ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Azerbaijan Transport Sector 2011
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Tochitskaya, Irina Working Paper Azerbaijan Transport Sector 2011 CASE Network Reports, No. 107 Provided in Cooperation with: Center for Social and Economic Research (CASE), Warsaw Suggested Citation: Tochitskaya, Irina (2012) : Azerbaijan Transport Sector 2011, CASE Network Reports, No. 107, ISBN 978-83-7178-559-7, Center for Social and Economic Research (CASE), Warsaw This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/87594 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu The views and opinions expressed here reflect the authors’ point of view and not necessarily those of CASE Network. This publication has been prepared under the project on “Advisory Services on Macroeconomic Management and Institutional Reform (ASMMIR)” for the Min- istry of Economic Development of Azerbaijan.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Partnership Enhancing Judicial Reform in the Eastern Partnership Countries
    Eastern Partnership Enhancing Judicial Reform in the Eastern Partnership Countries Efficient Judicial Systems Report 2014 Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law Strasbourg, December 2014 1 The Efficient Judicial Systems 2014 report has been prepared by: Mr Adiz Hodzic, Member of the Working Group on Evaluation of Judicial systems of the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) Mr Frans van der Doelen, Programme Manager of the Department of the Justice System, Ministry of Security and Justice, The Netherlands, Member of the Working Group on Evaluation of Judicial systems of the CEPEJ Mr Georg Stawa, Head of the Department for Projects, Strategy and Innovation, Federal Ministry of Justice, Austria, Chair of the CEPEJ 2 Table of content Conclusions and recommendations 3 Part I: Comparing Judicial Systems: Performance, Budget and Management Chapter 1: Introduction 11 Chapter 2: Disposition time and quality 17 Chapter 3: Public budget 26 Chapter 4: Management 35 Chapter 5: Efficiency: comparing resources, workload and performance (28 indicators) 44 Armenia 46 Azerbaijan 49 Georgia 51 Republic of Moldova 55 Ukraine 58 Chapter 6: Effectiveness: scoring on international indexes on the rule of law 64 Part II: Comparing Courts: Caseflow, Productivity and Efficiency 68 Armenia 74 Azerbaijan 90 Georgia 119 Republic of Moldova 139 Ukraine 158 Part III: Policy Making Capacities 178 Annexes 185 3 Conclusions and recommendations 1. Introduction This report focuses on efficiency of courts and the judicial systems of Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine, commonly referred the Easter Partnership Countries (EPCs) after the Eastern Partnership Programme of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Impact Assessment South Caucasus Gas Pipeline Azerbaijan
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT South Caucasus Gas Pipeline Azerbaijan Prepared for BP By AETC Ltd / ERM May 2002 SCP ESIA AZERBAIJAN DRAFT FOR DISCLOSURE GENERAL NOTES Project No: P8078 Title: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment South Caucasus Gas Pipeline Azerbaijan Client: BP Issue Date: May 2002 Issuing Office: Helsby Authorised by: Project Manager Date: Authorised by: Project QA Rep Date: AETC has prepared this report for the sole use of the client, showing reasonable skill and care, for the intended purposes as stated in the agreement under which this work was completed. The report may not be relied upon by any other party without the express agreement of the client, AETC and ERM. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made as to the professional advice included in this report. Where any data supplied by the client or from other sources have been used it has been assumed that the information is correct. No responsibility can be accepted by AETC for inaccuracies in the data supplied by any other party. The conclusions and recommendations I this report are based on the assumption that all relevant information has been supplied by those bodies from whom it was requested. No part of this report may be copied or duplicated without the express permission of the client and AETC and ERM and the party for whom it was prepared. Where field investigations have been carried out these have been restricted to a level of detail required to achieve the stated objectives of the work. This work has been undertaken in accordance with the Quality Management System of AETC.
    [Show full text]