DOCSLIB.ORG

Trotsky: the Sword of the Revolution 1917-1923

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Trotsky: the Sword of the Revolution 1917-1923 Trotsky: The Sword of the Revolution 1917-1923 Tony Cliff Bookmarks, London, 1990. Transcribed by Martin Fahlgren (July 2009) Marked up by Einde O’Callaghan for the Marxists Internet Archive Converted to ebook format June 2020 Cover photograph: Trotsky c.1918 Wikimedia Commons At the time of ebook conversion this title was out of print. Other works of Tony Cliff are available in hardcopy from: https://bookmarksbookshop.co.uk/ Contents Preface 1. The Consolidation of Soviet Power The Congress of the Soviets Towards a Coalition Government? The Beginning of the Red Terror 2. The Peace of Brest-Litovsk Differences in the Bolshevik Leadership The Harsh Terms of the Peace Treaty Negotiations with France and Britain Could Trotsky’s Tactic of ‘Neither War nor Peace’ Have Succeeded? 3. Building the Red Army Trotsky’s Knowledge of Military Doctrine Learning from History The Dominance of Politics 4. The Structure of the Red Army The Election of Officers The Move to Conscription Mass Desertions The Role of Workers and Communists The Use of Former Tsarist Officers Tensions Between Former Tsarist Officers and the Rank and File of the Red Army The Commissars 5. The Spirit of the Red Army The Internationalist Spirit of the Red Army Revolutionary Discipline The Struggle for Truth Tensions in the Red Army 6. The Red Army Blooded Sviiazhsk Trotsky’s Armoured Train The Army and Society 7. Opposition to Trotsky in the Red Army The Fight against Guerrillaism The Beginning of Military Opposition to Trotsky in the Communist Party Lenin and the Military Front The Eighth Congress 8. Disputes on Military Strategy The Southern Front The Red Cavalry The Defence of Petrograd The March on Warsaw 9. The Debate on Military Doctrine Military Science or Art? The Case of Tukhachevsky The Armed Militia 10. The Red Army and the Rise of the Stalinist Bureaucracy 11. War Communism at an Impasse Hunger, Epidemics and Cold Trotsky: Proponent of the New Economic Policy Labour Armies The Militarisation of all Labour Tsektran The Trade Union Debate The Views of Trotsky and Bukharin The Workers’ Opposition The Platform of the Ten The Conclusion of the Trade Union Debate How Can We Explain Trotsky’s Stand on the Trade Unions? Mass Disaffection Kronstadt Takes up Arms The Peasants’ Brest-Litovsk 12. The Decline of the Proletariat and the Rise of the Bureaucracy The Proletariat Burns Itself out in the Struggle The Bureaucratic Leviathan The Bolsheviks’ Political Monopoly The Transformation of the Party Increasing Centralisation of Power in the Party The Fight to Defend Party Democracy The Banning of Factions 13. First Steps of the Communist International The Second Congress of the Comintern 14. The Comintern: Trotsky Teaches Strategy and Tactics The Third Congress Trotsky and the French Communist Party In Conclusion 15. Lenin and Trotsky Join Forces to Fight Bureaucracy ‘Stop the Retreat’ Defending the Monopoly of Foreign Trade Lenin’s Bloc with Trotsky Against Great Russian Chauvinism Rabkrin Lenin’s Testament 16. Trotsky and the Triumvirate Trotsky Procrastinates Trotsky’s Report on Industry The Enigma: Why Did Trotsky Keep Quiet? Acknowledgements Several people have helped in the writing of this book. Many thanks are due to Chris Bambery, Alex Callinicos, Donny Gluckstein and Chris Harman. I owe a debt to Linda Aitken and Ahmed Shawki for help in locating material. Thanks are due in particular to John Molyneux for expert critical comment and most valuable stylistic suggestions, and to Peter Marsden for editing and advice. Chanie Rosenberg deserves a special thanks for participating in the editing of the manuscript and for typing it. Tony Cliff April 1990 Tony Cliff was a member of the Socialist Workers Party in Britain, and wrote many previous books. The first volume of this biography, Trotsky: Towards October 1879-1917, was published by Bookmarks in July 1989. His other books include the classic State Capitalism in Russia (1974) and two previous political biographies: Rosa Luxemburg (1959) and Lenin (in three volumes 1975-79). Preface THIS IS the second volume of a political biography of Leon Trotsky. It starts with the consolidation of Bolshevik power after the October revolution of 1917, follows Trotsky as commissar for foreign affairs in the peace negotiations with Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria and Turkey at Brest-Litovsk, and deals with his greatest achievement in these years: his creation and leadership of the Red Army in the civil war. The book ends with Trotsky’s isolation in the politburo after Lenin’s disappearance from the political scene. Trotsky’s building of the Red Army is rightly considered a gigantic achievement. By combining contradictory elements he produced a mighty army out of a void. The defence of the workers’ revolution called for a correct military strategy, which meant that Trotsky had to use former Tsarist officers – yet a social abyss separated these from the mass of the soldiers on whose enthusiasm and self-sacrifice the Red Army depended. It was against these same officers that the soldiers of the Tsarist army had rebelled. The conflict between soldiers and officers was congruent with that between peasants and landlords. Nonetheless, Trotsky argued strongly that without the passionate support of the soldiers and the technique of the professionals the Red Army could not be victorious. The heterogeneous nature of the soldiers of the Red Army – a minority of workers in a sea of peasants – added to the difficulties. The proletarian elements were the backbone of the Red Army, while the peasants were unstable, vacillating throughout the civil war. They favoured the Bolsheviks for giving them the land, but resented the Soviet government that requisitioned grain and introduced compulsory conscription. Hence mass desertions were common. To keep control over the former Tsarist officers, and at the same time preserve political leadership over the mass of the soldiers, the political commissar played a crucial role. One of the most serious developments in the Red Army was the rise of a military opposition to Trotsky. This was made up largely of old Bolsheviks, who had been commanders of Red Guard units before the Red Army was created and now resented taking orders from former Tsarist officers. They thought they did not need to learn from the specialists. They spoke about ‘proletarian military strategy’ and ‘proletarian military doctrine’. Often half-educated, crude and conceited, they criticised Trotsky’s attitude to culture in general and military doctrine in particular. When there were setbacks in the war this military opposition became more and more aggressive, and at times very strong indeed. For instance at the Eighth Congress of the Russian Communist Party, in March 1919, the official thesis on military policy, written by Trotsky and supported by Lenin, met widespread resistance: 174 delegates voted for it, 85 against and 32 abstained. The full significance of the early formation of the military opposition in the Red Army, as the embryo of the future Stalinist faction, became apparent only in the light of much later developments. Thus Trotsky, in his creation and leadership of the Red Army, sowed the seeds of an opposition that in the end contributed to his undoing. The war dominated every aspect of Soviet life, and the Red Army was to a large extent the foundation of the future bureaucracy. The hierarchical structure of the Red Army, rising on a socially heterogeneous base of which the atomised peasantry formed the bulk, inevitably strengthened bureaucratic trends. The strength of the bureaucracy in an organisation is in inverse proportion to the strength of the rank and file. Party organisation in the army modelled itself along military lines. The conditions of civil war, which made it imperative for military and civilian administrators to be transferred from one place to another in order to deal with states of emergency, further strengthened this bureaucracy. Trotsky himself recognised this, writing that at the end of the civil war, ‘the development of the Red Army of five millions played no small role in the formation of the bureaucracy’. Social and political changes during the civil war also encouraged the rise of the bureaucracy. The decline in the size of the proletariat and its disintegration and atomisation, the decline of the soviets – the directly elected workers’ councils, the merger of party and state, all contributed to the process. At the end of the civil war, the impasse of War Communism encouraged Trotsky (with Lenin’s agreement) to move towards using Red Army units as armies of labour and towards the militarisation of labour in general. This was the background to the trade union debate in the winter of 1920-21, when Trotsky argued for the statification of the trade unions, while the newly formed Workers’ Opposition argued for the unionisation of the state. Lenin shied away from both extremes. This volume also deals with the role of Trotsky in leading the Communist International, and in teaching its sections strategy and tactics. It deals also with Lenin’s turn on his death bed towards Trotsky, to form a bloc against the bureaucracy, against Great Russian chauvinism, and against Stalin. The final chapters discuss the Twelfth Congress of the party – the first without Lenin – at which Trotsky failed to carry out his agreement with Lenin that he would fight Stalin, and try to explain this lapse. The volume ends in April 1923. This was a short time before a number of great historical events: Lenin’s complete disappearance from the active scene, the defeat of the German revolution in October-November 1923, which marked the end of the revolutionary wave that had started at the end of 1918, the first appearance of Hitler, who led an unsuccessful coup in Bavaria in November 1923, and the formation of the Left Opposition in December 1923.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Learning to Swim in Stormy Weather” Was first Published July 31, 2011, at Winterends.Net
    Greece’s Communist Organization: LearningLearning toto SwimSwim inin StormyStormy WeatherWeather by Eric Ribellarsi Also includes “The in!uence of the Chinese Revolution on the Communist Movement of Greece” by the Communist Organization of Greece (KOE), 2006 KASAMA ESSAYS FOR DISCUSSION “Greece’s Communist Organization: Learning to Swim in Stormy Weather” was first published July 31, 2011, at winterends.net. Winter Has Its End is a team of reporters traveling during the summer of 2011 to places in the world where people are rising up. “!e influence of the Chinese Revolution on the Communist Move- ment of Greece” was published by the Communist Organization of Greece (KOE), May 2006 Published as a Kasama Essay for Discussion pamphlet August, 2011 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States Licence. Feel free to reprint, distribute or quote this with attribution. Cover photo illustration by Enzo Rhyner/original photo by Eric Ribellarsi Kasama is a communist project that seeks to reconceive and regroup for a profound revolutionary transformation of society. website: kasamaproject.org email: [email protected] 80045_r2 08.11 Greece’s Communist Organization: Learning to Swim in Stormy Weather by Eric Ribellarsi We in Kasama, and many others, have been en- Great and energetic hopes often masked under- gaged for several years now in trying to imagine new lying naiveté and fracture lines that would inevitably ways to fuse revolutionary ideas with the popular dis- come to the fore: How should these popular move- content of the people. It is part of what drew our Win- ments view the existing army (in Egypt), or the intru- ter’s End reporti ng team to Greece and what draws sive Western powers (in Libya), or problems of defin- us now to discuss the Communist Organization of ing specific solutions, or the organizational problems Greece (known as the KOE, and pronounced ‘Koy’).
    [Show full text]
  • The Revolutions of 1989 and Their Legacies
    1 The Revolutions of 1989 and Their Legacies Vladimir Tismaneanu The revolutions of 1989 were, no matter how one judges their nature, a true world-historical event, in the Hegelian sense: they established a historical cleavage (only to some extent conventional) between the world before and after 89. During that year, what appeared to be an immutable, ostensibly indestructible system collapsed with breath-taking alacrity. And this happened not because of external blows (although external pressure did matter), as in the case of Nazi Germany, but as a consequence of the development of insuperable inner tensions. The Leninist systems were terminally sick, and the disease affected first and foremost their capacity for self-regeneration. After decades of toying with the ideas of intrasystemic reforms (“institutional amphibiousness”, as it were, to use X. L. Ding’s concept, as developed by Archie Brown in his writings on Gorbachev and Gorbachevism), it had become clear that communism did not have the resources for readjustment and that the solution lay not within but outside, and even against, the existing order.1 The importance of these revolutions cannot therefore be overestimated: they represent the triumph of civic dignity and political morality over ideological monism, bureaucratic cynicism and police dictatorship.2 Rooted in an individualistic concept of freedom, programmatically skeptical of all ideological blueprints for social engineering, these revolutions were, at least in their first stage, liberal and non-utopian.3 The fact that 1 See Archie Brown, Seven Years that Changed the World: Perestroika in Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 157-189. In this paper I elaborate upon and revisit the main ideas I put them forward in my introduction to Vladimir Tismaneanu, ed., The Revolutions of 1989 (London and New York: Routledge, 1999) as well as in my book Reinventing Politics: Eastern Europe from Stalin to Havel (New York: Free Press, 1992; revised and expanded paperback, with new afterword, Free Press, 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Not for Distribution
    6 The decline of the legitimate monopoly of violence and the return of non-state warriors Cihan Tuğal Introduction For the last few decades, political sociology has focused on state-making. We are therefore quite ill equipped to understand the recent rise of non-state violence throughout the world. Even if states still seem to perform more violence than non- state actors, the latter’s actions have come to significantly transform relationships between citizens and states. Existing frameworks predispose scholars to treat non-state violence too as an instrument of state-building. However, we need to consider whether non-state violence serves other purposes as well. This chapter will first point out how the post-9/11 world problematises one of sociology’s major assumptions (the state’s monopolisation of legitimate violence). It will then trace the social prehistory of non-state political violence to highlight continui- ties with today’s intensifying religious violence. It will finally emphasise that the seemingly inevitable rise of non-state violence is inextricably tangled with the emergence of the subcontracting state. Neo-liberalisation aggravates the practico- ethical difficulties secular revolutionaries and religious radicals face (which I call ‘the Fanonite dilemma’ and ‘the Qutbi dilemma’). The monopolisation of violence: social implications War-making, military apparatuses and international military rivalry figure prominently in today’s political sociology. This came about as a reaction to the sociology and political science of the postwar era: for quite different rea- sons, both tended to ignore the influence of militaries and violence on domestic social structure. Political science unduly focused on the former and sociology on the latter, whereas (according to the new political sociology) international violence and domestic social structure are tightly linked (Mann 1986; Skocpol 1979; Tilly 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • A Century of 1917S: Ideas, Representations, and Interpretations of the October Revolution, 1917–2017 * Andrea Graziosi
    Harvard Ukrainian Studiesa 36, century no. 1–2 (2019):of 1917s 9–44. 9 ONE HUNDRED YEARS AFTER THE REVOLUTION A Century of 1917s: Ideas, Representations, and Interpretations of the October Revolution, 1917–2017 * Andrea Graziosi Introduction he celebrations of the 1917 centenary were striking for both their diversity and the diminishment of the event they commemorated, Tfrom Moscow’s low-key celebrations,1 to the missing or halfhearted remembrances organized in the former Soviet and socialist countries, to the West’s many platitudes—all of them stridently contradicting the initial energy of 1917. Embarrassment and hollowness were the key words in Russia, where, in 2017, 1917 was presented either as a “world historical event” illustrating the country’s greatness and importance by the very fact that it had taken place there, or it was buried under occasional studies of local events, with very little room left over for ideas. In the remain- ing post-Soviet states, as well as in the former socialist countries, silence often fell on what was until recently a hot terrain of polemics * This essay is based on a lecture that I delivered at the Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute on 6 November 2017, “Rethinking the 1917 Revolution,” as well as on a presentation that I gave at the 100th Anniversary Roundtable “The Bolshevik Revolution and Its Legacy in the USSR, Post-Soviet Russia, and the West,” organized by the Davis Center on the following day. The idea for this essay came from the way I reconstructed the interpretations of the Soviet experience in the chapter “What is the Soviet Union?” in my Histoire de l’URSS (Paris: PUF, 2010; Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Revolutionary Shocks, Divergent Results
    Beyond Academia: The International Interactions Policy Blog Revolutionary shocks, divergent results Ammar Shamaileh explains the implications of his research article, "Never out of Now: Preference Falsification, Social Capital and the Arab Spring," published in International Interactions Vol. 45 Issue 6. This article is open access. In 2010, the self-immolation of a young Tunisian man, Mohamed Bouazizi, set in motion a series of events that fundamentally altered the way scholars and analysts discuss the Arab world. His actions led to protests that quickly toppled President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali’s government, and this appeared to increase protest activity in many other Arab states. Almost immediately after the Tunisian Revolution, discussions of the region's political order shifted away from explaining its authoritarian stability to predicting a democratic wave. Nearly a decade has passed since the beginning of the Arab Spring, and what has now become clear to most is that the region neither experienced a democratic wave nor was stably autocratic. This article seeks to help us understand the barriers to revolutionary diffusion by examining what diffuses across authoritarian borders during revolutionary waves, and how a recently-terminated civil war may influence the expression of political preferences during periods of regional instability. Revolutions are often assumed to spark bandwagon effects in neighboring states, increasing regional expressions of dissent. As individuals observe the behavior of those residing in a neighboring state caught in the midst of a revolution, certain beliefs or sentiments that increase the willingness to protest may spread to these outside observers. In the case of the Arab Spring, this assumption has often been fundamental to analyses and discussions of the spread of revolutionary fervor in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Class Consciousness and Revolutionary Organisation (2018)
    Class Consciousness and Revolutionary Organisation Pamphlet of the £3/$4/€4 Communist Workers’ Organisation Class Consciousness and Revolutionary Organisation Pamphlet of the Communist Workers’ Organisation Affiliate of the Internationalist Communist Tendency in Britain Introduction 1 1 Idealism and Bourgeois Materialism 2 2 How Working Class Consciousness Develops 7 3 Marx, Engels and Proletarian Organisation 11 4 The Era of Social Democracy and the Fight Against Revisionism 15 5 On the Eve of Revolution: the Debate Between Luxemburg and Lenin 21 6 Class Consciousness and Working Class Political Organisations 28 7 Party and Class in the Revolutionary Wave 1917-1921 33 8 The Decline of the Russian Revolution and the Cult of the Party 37 9 The Idealism of Bordigism 43 10 By Way of Conclusion: Towards Proletarian World Revolution 49 For correspondence write to: BM CWO London WC1N 3XX email: [email protected] or visit our website: http://www.leftcom.org Subscriptions to Revolutionary Perspectives (3 issues) and Aurora (at least 4 issues): UK: £15 (€18) Europe: £20 (€24) World: £25 (€30, $30) How to pay: By cheque made out to the “CWO” and sending it to the address above. By emailing us at [email protected] and asking for our banking details. By Paypal using the “Donate” button on our webpage. You can also take out a supporter’s sub by adding £10 (€12) to each sum. This will give you priority mailings of Aurora and other publications including free pamphlets as they are published. Introduction The issue of class consciousness is one of the most important for the working class, and for its revolutionary minorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Times: from the 1917 Russian Revolution to the Revolution of Our
    Abstract: The present work is an attempt to locate the relevance of the C R Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. It takes as a premise the thesis that the I previous century was announced by this event, which indeed brought the S Wild Times: From I idea of Communism from the marginal debates into the center of political S action. It then goes on to debate revolutions as a plebeian moment, all the way to the possibility and the nature of socialism today, by taking a detour & the 1917 Russian through the meaning of the Bolshevik Revolution. The paper concludes C with affirming the necessity of revolutions, as something which dignifies R I the human beings. T Keywords: Russian Revolution, Lenin, plebeian, Revolution, Gramsci, I Revolution to the Q Soviet Union U E We are living in wild times. It’s difficult for our generation to / Revolution of Our adapt to the new situation. But through this revolution, our Volume 4 / lives will be purified and things will get better for the youth. Issue 2 Times S. Semyonov, spring of 19171 I.- The Revelation The revolutionary outburst split the world in two; moreover, it split the social imaginary of the world in two. On the one hand, the existing world with its inequalities, exploitations and injustices; on the other hand, a possible world of equality, without exploitation, without injustice: socialism. However, the result was not the creation of a new alternative world to the capitalist one, but the emergence -in the collective Álvaro García expectation of the world’s subordinates- of the mobilizing belief that this could be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 State-Breaking and the Crisis of Arab Authoritarianism Ariel I. Ahram
    State-Breaking and the Crisis of Arab Authoritarianism Ariel I. Ahram [email protected] Assistant Professor of Political Science College of International Studies University of Oklahoma The Arab world is witnessing one of the most prolonged and violent periods of revolutionary change in its modern history. The decades-long dictatorships of Zeen al-‘Abadin Ben Ali in Tunisia and Hosni Mubarak in Egypt have collapsed and major protests and violent regime countermeasures have erupted in nearly every country in the region. What makes this moment so remarkable is that the Arab world had been the most stable bastion of authoritarianism on earth. In some ways, this crisis has been a long time coming, stemming from the breakdown of the Arab world’s distinctive political economic bargain whereby authoritarian states gained legitimacy by guaranteeing a robust social safety net and public sector employment. Anemic private sector growth after the turn toward economic liberalization in the 1980s and 1990s, though, left many Arabs, especially the young, with bleak prospects. Today’s revolutionary movements have proven remarkably adept in channeling quotidian anger and frustration into new repertoires of contention and protest. How far will the revolutionary wave reach? What will be left in its wake? Outcomes will vary from country to country due to the differences in opportunity presented by the compounding demographic and economic crises and the abilities of the opposition trying to seize them. Like the opposition they desperately seek to defeat, incumbent regimes themselves try to adapt and regroup, positioning themselves for counterrevolution. Democracy could arise either by successful post-revolutionary elections or more gradually through concessions by incumbent 1 regimes that allow greater public participation in legislation and more effective checks on executive power.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy, Meta-Strategy and Anti-Capitalist Activism
    Socialist Studies Études socialistes The Journal of the Society for Socialist Studies Revue de la Société d’études socialistes ‘You are Here’ an interview with Dorothy E. Smith Vol. 6 No. 2 Special Section Rosa Luxemburg’s Political Economy Klaus Dörre, Peter Hudis, Ingo Schmidt, Helen Scott, Estrella Trincado, Paul LeBlanc Fall 2010 Book Reviews www.socialiststudies.com ISSN 1918-2821 Socialist Studies: the Journal of the Society for Socialist Studies 6(2) Fall 2010 Socialist Studies: the Journal of the Society for Socialist Studies, is published by the Society for Socialist Studies. The Society for Socialist Studies is an association of progressive academics, students, activists and members of the general public. Since its creation in 1966, the Society has been dedicated to providing a forum for those who promote a socialist perspective as a foundation on which to build solutions to political, economic, workplace, social, gender, ethnic, environmental and other forms of exploitation, oppression and injustice. It is unique in bringing together individuals from all walks of life and as a member of the Canadian Federation for Humanities and Social Sciences, is in a position to create links with other organizations, promote the concerns of members, and present an influential face to policy makers. As such, Socialist Studies: The Journal of the Society for Socialist Studies is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing articles on as broad an array of topics as possible from all fields of study. Typically, articles will adopt a critical perspective, which will shed light on, and offer remedies for, any form of social, economic or political injustice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southern African Revolution
    THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN REVOLUTION JOHN S. SAUL Writing twenty years ago in The Socialist Register 1969l Giovanni Arrighi and I painted a bleak picture of independent Africa's prospects, suggesting the likely 'stability of existing neo-colonial structures' for the foreseeable future and arguing that 'the "Latin Americanization" of independent Africa is well underway'. This has proven to be an accurate prophesy, although, to be hon- est, we could not have predicted, even in our wildest imaginings, just how catastrophic for Africa this denouement to the continent's march towards independence would prove to be. Was there a bright side to the picture in 1969? 'Hope,' we argued, 'must instead be focused upon the liberation struggle in southern Africa, the implications of which are bound to have truly continental dimensions' In the 'centres' of southern Africa the peasantry has been effectively proletarianized and the social structure produced by the pattern of development in which the white settlers play the hegemonic role leaves little if any, room for a neo-colonial solution. Moreover, in the periphery of this region (the Portuguese territories) the neo-colonial solution has been blocked by the 'ultra-colonialism' of Portugal and the peasant revolution which has ensued is creating subjec- tive conditions for socialist transformation which are generally absent elsewhere in independent black Africa. We did counsel against 'any illusions concerning the nature and short-term prospects of the struggle in southern Africa' but concluded that, 'at the present historical moment, this (struggle) provides the main, if not the only, leverage for revolutionary change in Sub-Saharan Africa'.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolution, Non-Violence, and the Arab Uprisings
    George Lawson Revolution, non-violence, and the Arab Uprisings Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Lawson, George (2015) Revolution, non-violence, and the Arab Uprisings. Mobilization: An International Quarterly . ISSN 1086-671X (In Press) © 2015 Mobilization: An International Quarterly This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/63156/ Available in LSE Research Online: August 2015 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Revolution, Non-Violence, and the Arab Uprisings George Lawson, London School of Economics Abstract This article combines insights from the literature on revolutions with that on non- violent protest in order to assess the causes and outcomes of the Arab Uprisings. The article makes three main arguments: first, international
    [Show full text]
  • Communist Organization of Greece the Influence of the Chinese
    Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line Communist Organization of Greece The influence of the Chinese Revolution on the Communist Movement of Greece Published: May 2006 http://www. : international.koel.gr Transcription, Editing and Markup: Sam Richards and Paul Saba Copyright: This work is in the Public Domain under the Creative Commons Common Deed. You can freely copy, distribute and display this work; as well as make derivative and commercial works. Please credit the Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line as your source, include the url to this work, and note any of the transcribers, editors & proofreaders above. The influence of the Chinese Revolution on the Communist Movement of Greece (2006) Contribution to the project of Comrade Bao Yu Ching Introduction Without a doubt, the struggle of the Chinese communists has influenced and to a point defined the development of the international communist movement. We cannot know what the scope of the resistance against revisionism and capitalist restoration would be if the essential contribution of the Communist Party of China (CPC), the Chinese communists and Mao Tsetung had not taken place. However, the real question that should bother us and points towards a critical assessment is: has everything possible to oppose revisionism and the capitalist restoration been done? The answer is not easy and we don’t have all the clues necessary to give it. The internal developments in China and the international developments during the ’60s and ’70s are not easy to be “deciphered”, neither would be methodologically correct to judge by the “result”. On one hand, there is the fact that the “general headquarters” that led the struggle against Soviet revisionism during the ’60s (and looked united at that time), would split later, during the Cultural Revolution.
    [Show full text]