DOCSLIB.ORG

Transit Technologies Worksheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transit Technologies Worksheet Transit Technologies. Worksheet 1 2 A Review of Transit Technology Specifications 1. Heavy Rail Transit 2. Commuter Rail Transit 3. Light Rail Transit 4. Modern Streetcar 5. Heritage Trolley 3 4 6. Dedicated Lane BRT 7. Express Bus 5 6 Photo credits from left to right 7 1. answers.com 2. newrecruit.com 3. lightrail.com 4. APTA Heritagetrolley.org 5. APTA Heritagetrolley.org 6. sfcta.org 7. thetransitcoalition.us 8. infilldenver.com Heavy Rail. Transit Definition: The term heavy rail refers to a mode of transportation that is defined less by its vehicle weight than by its complexity and operational rigidity. Heavy rail systems typically consist of steel-wheeled, electric powered vehicles operating in trains of two or more cars on a fully grade-separated right-of- way. (FTA) Example Cities: Station Type: Typical Power Source: Washington DC (Metro) Station, Platform Electric San Francisco (BART) New York (MTA) Distance Between Stations: FRA Compliant: (Able to run on Boston (MBTA) Urban Core >1 mile tracks with freight trains) Chicago (CTA) Periphery 1-5 miles No Projected Costs per Mile Service Frequency: $50-$250 Million 5-10 Minutes (Peak) High System Cost: $558 Million (Estimated) Alignment: San Francisco Central Subway Separate Right of Way Low System Costs: Right of Way Width: $73.12 Million (Estimated) 25-33 Feet Chicago Blue Line Rebuild Turning Radius: Service Type: 330 Feet Regional, Urban Vehicle Length: Photo: New York City Subway Operating Speed: 40-70 Feet per car From: Answers.com 50-80 MPH Up to 10 car trains Commuter Rail. Transit Definition: Commuter Rail is an electric or diesel propelled railway for urban passenger train service consisting of local short distance travel operating between a central city and adjacent suburbs. Example Cities: Operating Speed: Vehicle Length: Boston (MBTA) 30-60 MPH 150-500 Feet New Jersey (NJT) Engine and Coaches New York (Long Island RR) Station Type: Dallas – Fort Worth (TRE) Station, Platform Typical Power Source: San Jose – San Francisco Diesel (CalTrain) Distance Between Stations: 2-5 Miles FRA Compliant: Projected Costs per Mile Yes $3-$25 Million* Service Frequency: 20-30 Minutes High System Cost: $16.57 (Estimated) Chicago Southwest Corridor Alignment: Commuter Rail Generally built on existing tracks at grade street crossings Low System Costs: $1.2 Million Right of Way Width: Nashville 37+ Feet Service Type: Turning Radius: Photo: Caltrain, San Fransisco Peninsula Regional, Intraurban 140-460 Feet From: newrecruit.com Stephen DesRoches Light Rail. Transit Definition: The term light rail refers more to this mode’s relative simplicity and operational flexibility than to actual vehicle weight or cost. With an overhead power supply, light rail systems can operate in mixed traffic and widely ranging alignment configurations.(FTA) Example Cities: Station Type: Vehicle Length: Denver Sidewalk Sign, Station, 50-80 Feet per car and up to 4 Minneapolis Platform car trains Dallas Houston Distance Between Stations: Typical Power Source: Salt Lake City ~1 Mile Electric Projected Costs per Mile Service Frequency: FRA Compliant: $20-$60 Million ($56)^ 5-30 Minutes No High System Cost: $65 Million Alignment: Los Angeles Gold Line (2003) Aligned center or side of street ^ This includes estimates and corridor on separate right of figures for Complete Systems Low System Costs: way in Final Design, Under Con- $34 Million struction, or completed after Houston (2004) Right of Way Width: 2003 that do not include tun- 19-33 Feet (Double Track) neling <http://www.lightrail. Service Type: 11-13 Feet (Single Track) com/LRTSystems.htm> Regional, Urban Turning Radius: Photo: Hudson Bergen LRT From: transitpicsgallery.com Operating Speed: 50-100 Feet 20-60 MPH Modern Streetcar. Definition: The U.S. term streetcar is generic to most forms of common carrier rail transit that runs or has run on streets, providing a local service and picking up and discharging passengers at any street corner, unless otherwise marked. Example Cities: Station Type: Vehicle Length: Portland Sidewalk Sign, Station, 35-60 Feet Seattle (Design Phase) Platform Washington DC (Under Typical Power Source: Construction) Distance Between Stations: Electric 0.25 Miles Projected Costs per Mile FRA Compliant: $10-$25 Million Service Frequency: No 8-15 Minutes High System Cost: * Modern Streetcar and Light $23.7 Million Rail systems are often lumped Portland Alignment: In Street with traffic, no grade in with road and utility recon- Low System Costs: separation struction increasing the costs. * Low cost systems are viable Right of Way Width: however there are no examples Service Type: 19-24 (Double Track) at the moment Urban Circulator 11-13 (Single Track) Operating Speed: Turning Radius: 8-12 MPH 40-80 Feet Photo: Portland Streetcar From: railwaypreservation.com Heritage. Trolley Definition: The terms Heritage Trolley and Vintage Trolley are used to describe modern use of trolleys of a design dating from roughly 1900 to 1950. The terms can be used to refer either to a replica car that more or less accurately reproduces a trolley from the first half of the 20th century, or to an original preserved car restored to accurate or nearly accurate standards. (APTA) Example Cities: Station Type: Vehicle Length: New Orleans Sidewalk Sign, Station, 35-50 Feet Memphis Platform Little Rock Typical Power Source: Kenosha Distance Between Stations: Electric Galveston 0.25 Miles FRA Compliant: Projected Costs per Mile Service Frequency: No $2-$12 Million 8-15 Minutes High System Cost: $12 Million Alignment: Charlotte In Street with traffic, no grade separation Low System Costs: $2.5 Million Right of Way Width: Kenosha, Wi 19-24 (Double Track) 11-13 (Single Track) Service Type: Urban Circulator Turning Radius: Photo: San Francisco F Line 40-50 Feet From: APTA Heritagetrolley.org Operating Speed: 8-12 MPH Dedicated. Lane BRT Definition: Bus rapid transit (BRT) is a relatively new umbrella term for urban mass transportation services utilizing buses to perform premium services on existing roadways or dedicated rights-of-way. Example Cities: Station Type: Vehicle Length: Boston Sidewalk Sign, Station, 30 -50 Feet Pittsburgh Platform Cleveland Typical Power Source: Eugene Distance Between Stations: Diesel, Electric 0.25-2 Miles Projected Costs per Mile FRA Compliant: $4-$40 Million Service Frequency: N/A 8-20 Minutes High System Cost: $55 Million Pittsburgh West Busway Alignment: HOV lanes or separated right Low System Costs: of way in median or on curb $6.25 Million Los Angeles San Bernadino Right of Way Width: Freeway HOV Busway 12 (Pittsburg Single) 28 (Pittsburg Double) Service Type: Regional, Urban Turning Radius: Photo: Proposed Van Ness BRT 40-70 Feet From: sfcta.org Operating Speed: 8-12 MPH Express. Bus Definition: An Express bus is a bus service that is intended to run faster than normal bus lines. These buses usually run between the downtown sections of cities and the more residential Suburbs or Outer Boroughs. Example Cities: Alignment: Any City with a Bus System In Street with traffic Projected Costs per Mile Right of Way Width: $1-$2 Million Street Width Service Type: Turning Radius: Regional, Urban 33-46 Feet Operating Speed: Vehicle Length: 15-19 MPH 30-50 Feet Station Type: Sidewalk Sign, Platform Typical Power Source: Diesel Distance Between Stations: Limited stops along normal FRA Compliant: N/A bus routes Photo: Maple Grove Minnesota Express Bus Service Frequency: From: www.ci.maple-grove.mn.us/adminis- tration/transit 10-20 Minutes Contact. Us Data Sources: APTA HeritageTrolley.org TCRP 90 - Bus Rapid Transit Reconnecting America Lightrail.com DART Technology Review Report 436 14th Street Suite 1005 ‘Future Transport in Cities’ - Brian Richards ‘Urban Public Transportation - Oakland, CA 94612 Systems and Technology’ - Vukan R. Vuchic (510) 268-8602.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Your Paper's Title Starts Here
    Dual Rated Speeds Escalator in Rapid Transit System with Extended Ramping Up and Down KC Gan, LF Cai, SC Cheah, Hadi Wijaya, Melvyn Thong Land Transport Authority, Singapore Keywords: Dual rated speeds, automatic switching, rapid transit system, acceleration, ramping up, ramping down, vibration, jerkiness. Abstract. To cater for different needs of escalator operating speeds in rapid transit systems (i.e. higher rated speed of 0.75m/s during peak hours is for effective discharging of passengers while slower rated speed of 0.50m/s during off-peak hours is for elderly passengers), we have introduced the dual rated speed escalator. Conventionally, the switching between 2 rated speeds can be done either manually through a key switch or automatically when no passengers are detected on the escalators at pre-set timing. However, there is a possibility of not being able to change speed if there are constant passengers coming into the rapid transit station, taking the escalators. Therefore, this shortcoming will be overcome by setting up a schedule timetable to do the safe switching of escalator rated speeds with passengers riding on the escalators with extended ramping up and down without comprising any safety requirements. This paper presents the case studies conducted on an existing station where a performance–based approach was adopted. The timing for the speed ramping up/down between the 2 rated speeds has been increased to 30 seconds in order to reduce the acceleration which results in minimizing the acceleration (vibration) and the rate of change of this acceleration (jerk). The objective is to ensure that the passenger’s perception are imperceptible and do not experience any abnormal and sudden change of vibration and jerk during the switching of dual rated speeds with extended ramping up and down.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus and Shared-Ride Taxi Use in Two Small Urban Areas
    Bus and Shared-Ride Taxi Use in Two Small Urban Areas David P. Middendorf, Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Company Kenneth W. Heathington, University of Tennessee The demand for publicly owned fixed-route. fixed-schedule bus service are used for work and business-related trips to and was compared with tho demand for privately owned shared-ride taxi ser­ within CBDs and for short social, shopping, medical, vice in Davenport. Iowa, and Hicksville, New York, through on-board and personal business trips. surveys end cab company dispatch records and driver logs. The bus and In many small cities and in many suburbs of large slmrcd·ride taxi systems in Davenport com11eted for the off.peak-period travel market. During off-peak hours, the taxis tended to attract social· metropol.il;e:H!:i, l.lus~s nd taxicabs operate within tlie recreation, medical, and per onal business trips between widely scattered same jlu·isclictions and may compete for the same public origins and destinations, while the buses tended 10 attract shopping and transportation market. Two examples of small commu­ personal business trips to the CBD. The shared-ride taxi system in Hicks· nities in which buses and ta.xis coexist are Davenport, ville, in addition to providing many-to·many service, competed with the Iowa, and Hicksville, New York. The markets, eco­ counlywide bus system as a feeder system to the Long Island commuter nomic characteristics, organization, management, and railroad network. In each study area, the markets of each mode of public operation of the taxicab systems sel'Ving these commu­ transportation were similar.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Assessment of Urban Transport Systems in Bangkok
    Assessment Urban Transport System: Bangkok, Thailand Siradol Siridhara Mahidol University BLAK Bangkok Metro and Vicinity Population 16.43 million Bkk Population 5.56 million Employment 10.42 million Income 39,459 baht/hh Bangkok Metro and Vicinity 35 million trips per day. ≈ 70% by private vehicles. Average Speeds Morning peak hour 10.7 kph Evening peak hour 14.2 kph Key Players Regulators, Project Owners & Operators Rail Bus Regulators Project Owners Project Operators 3 Current Rail Network Current Network: 5 Lines, 97 Stations, 142.9 km Light Green Line 32 stations 39.5 km Dark Green Line 13 stations 14.7 km Blue Line 26 stations 47.0 km Purple Line 16 stations 23.6 km Airport Rail Link 8 Stations 28.6 km Total 153.4 km Green Blue Purple Red Ridership (approx.) 1500000 trips/day4 Future Rail Network Future Network: Approx. 540 km Light Green Line 55 stations 66.5 km Dark Green Line 20 stations 22.5 km Blue Line 42 stations 55.0 km Purple Line 32 stations 42.8 km Orange Line 30 stations 35.4 km Pink Line 30 stations 36.0 km Yellow Line 23 stations 30.4 km Brown Line 23 stations 21.0 km Gold Line 4 stations 2.7 km Grey 39 stations 26.0 km Light Blue Line 19 stations 30.0 km Light Red Line 55 stations 58.5 km Dark Red Line 20 stations 80.8 km Airport Rail Link 14 Stations 49.5 km Total 504 km 5 Assessment Urban Transport System: Bangkok SUTI01 Extent to Which Transport Plans Cover Public Transport, Intermodal Facilities and Infrastructure for Active Modes MIN SCORE MAX 0 11 16 No Aspects Explanation Score 1 Walking Networks Little attention has been paid to pedestrian network planning, although the awareness of maintenance of walkways and other pedestrian facilities have 2 been raised from the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison Between Bus Rapid Transit and Light-Rail Transit Systems: a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach
    Urban Transport XXIII 143 COMPARISON BETWEEN BUS RAPID TRANSIT AND LIGHT-RAIL TRANSIT SYSTEMS: A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS APPROACH MARÍA EUGENIA LÓPEZ LAMBAS1, NADIA GIUFFRIDA2, MATTEO IGNACCOLO2 & GIUSEPPE INTURRI2 1TRANSyT, Transport Research Centre, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain 2Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAR), University of Catania, Italy ABSTRACT The construction choice between two different transport systems in urban areas, as in the case of Light-Rail Transit (LRT) and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) solutions, is often performed on the basis of cost-benefit analysis and geometrical constraints due to the available space for the infrastructure. Classical economic analysis techniques are often unable to take into account some of the non-monetary parameters which have a huge impact on the final result of the choice, since they often include social acceptance and sustainability aspects. The application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques can aid decision makers in the selection process, with the possibility to compare non-homogeneous criteria, both qualitative and quantitative, and allowing the generation of an objective ranking of the different alternatives. The coupling of MCDA and Geographic Information System (GIS) environments also permits an easier and faster analysis of spatial parameters, and a clearer representation of indicator comparisons. Based on these assumptions, a LRT and BRT system will be analysed according to their own transportation, economic, social and environmental impacts as a hypothetical exercise; moreover, through the use of MCDA techniques a global score for both systems will be determined, in order to allow for a fully comprehensive comparison. Keywords: BHLS, urban transport, transit systems, TOPSIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Bus/Light Rail Integration Lynx Blue Line Extension Reference Effective March 19, 2018
    2/18 www.ridetransit.org 704-336-RIDE (7433) | 866-779-CATS (2287) 866-779-CATS | (7433) 704-336-RIDE BUS/LIGHT RAIL INTEGRATION LYNX BLUE LINE EXTENSION REFERENCE EFFECTIVE MARCH 19, 2018 INTEGRACIÓN AUTOBÚS/FERROCARRIL LIGERO REFERENCIA DE LA EXTENSIÓN DE LA LÍNEA LYNX BLUE EN VIGOR A PARTIR DEL 19 DE MARZO DE 2018 On March 19, 2018, CATS will be introducing several bus service improvements to coincide with the opening of the LYNX Blue Line Light Rail Extension. These improvements will assist you with direct connections and improved travel time. Please review the following maps and service descriptions to learn more. El 19 de marzo de 2018 CATS introducirá varias mejoras al servicio de autobuses que coincidirán con la apertura de la extensión de ferrocarril ligero de la línea LYNX Blue. Estas mejoras lo ayudarán con conexiones directas y un mejor tiempo de viaje. Consulte los siguientes mapas y descripciones de servicios para obtener más información. TABLE OF CONTENTS ÍNDICE Discontinued Bus Routes ....................................1 Rutas de autobús discontinuadas ......................1 54X University Research Park | 80X Concord Express 54X University Research Park | 80X Concord Express 201 Garden City | 204 LaSalle | 232 Grier Heights 201 Garden City | 204 LaSalle | 232 Grier Heights Service Improvements .........................................2 Mejoras al servicio ...............................................2 LYNX Blue Line | 3 The Plaza | 9 Central Ave LYNX Blue Line | 3 The Plaza | 9 Central Ave 11 North Tryon | 13 Nevin
    [Show full text]
  • Charoen Nakhon Thailand
    NAVARANG ASSET PRESENT CHAROEN NAKHON THAILAND About Best Health & Culture Restaurants Wellness Heritage CHAROEN Instagramable NAKHON Coffee Culture ATTRACTIONS! And more ... VOL. 01 MAY 2021 01 CHAROEN NAKHON How to get there? From 40 Suvarnabhumi international mins airport From 20 Sukhumvit rd mins (Siam-Asoke) From 5 BTS Krung mins Thon Buri Charoen Nakhon is located along Thailand’s most majestic river “The Chao Praya”. Widely regarded as Bangkok’s most popular trade route and cultural heritage site. From cool art and lifestyle hubs, ‘trendy cafes, and superb street eats to iconic riverside hotels, not to forget the unique shopping districts, life on Charoen Nakhon has never been more attractive. With the new BTS Gold Line on rails, Charoen Nakhon is one of the most desirable neighborhoods of Bangkok. 02 CHAROEN NAKHON About Charoen Nakhon There are few places in the world that make it possible for The riverside neighborhood can visitors to see its urban areas via boat. Charoen Nakhon is a be reached via a handful of BTS charming neighborhood situated in the Thonburi community on stations, or by boat, which is the western banks of the Chao Phraya River. Thonburi was the oftentimes a faster and more capital of Thailand for a short time in 1768, after Ayutthaya authentic way to see the city. was destroyed by the Burmese. After the capital was moved While many tourists who venture across the river, Thonburi became a separate city, but now it is this way come to stay in one of one of many districts that make up the city of Bangkok.
    [Show full text]
  • Sounder Commuter Rail (Seattle)
    Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Final Report PRC 14-12 F Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Texas A&M Transportation Institute PRC 14-12 F December 2014 Authors Jolanda Prozzi Rydell Walthall Megan Kenney Jeff Warner Curtis Morgan Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 8 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 9 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 10 Sharing Rail Infrastructure ........................................................................................................ 10 Three Scenarios for Sharing Rail Infrastructure ................................................................... 10 Shared-Use Agreement Components .................................................................................... 12 Freight Railroad Company Perspectives ............................................................................... 12 Keys to Negotiating Successful Shared-Use Agreements .................................................... 13 Rail Infrastructure Relocation ................................................................................................... 15 Benefits of Infrastructure Relocation ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Trolleybuses for the Lacmta's Bus System
    ARIELI ASSOCIATES MANAGEMENT, OPERATIONS AND ENGINEERING CONSULTING Report No. 1302 ELECTRIC TROLLEYBUSES FOR THE LACMTA’S BUS SYSTEM PREPARED FOR THE ADVANCED TRANSIT VEHICLE CONSORTIUM UNDER CONTRACT NO. OP 3320661 - 2 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY California Air Resources Board (CARB) Adopted Urban Bus Transit Rule for 2010 Emission Standards requires that MTA, starting in 2010, set aside 15% of all bus purchases to acquire Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEVs). Currently, none of the buses in the MTA’s inventory can be classified as ZEV, nor there are any transit buses [defined as propelled by an internal combustion engine (ICE) powered by either diesel or alternate fuels] available on the market that can be classified as ZEV. The California emission standards are well ahead of those for the rest of the United States and the manufacturers will not develop suitable vehicles on their own unless incentivized by large customers such as LACMTA. Failure to meet the 2010 Emission Standards will result in regulatory punitive fines and potentially litigation. It is important to note here that this is not the first time that the subject of incorporating electric trolleybuses into the MTA’s bus system comes before the MTA Board of Directors. In the 1992 30-Year Integrated Transportation Plan, electric trolleybuses were the preferred solution to meet CARB air regulations. The Plan provided for 18 routes, 300 miles of overhead wires and 400 peak electric trolleybuses by 2004 to be increased to 1,100 peak electric trolleybuses by 2010. Eventually, the Board voted to terminate the project. After reviewing the various technologies that might qualify as zero emissions under CARB rule, the report focuses on electric trolleybuses as the technology of choice.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENCY PROFILE and FACTS RTD Services at a Glance
    AGENCY PROFILE AND FACTS RTD Services at a Glance Buses & Rail SeniorRide SportsRides Buses and trains connect SeniorRide buses provide Take RTD to a local the metro area and offer an essential service to our sporting event, Eldora an easy RTDway to Denver services senior citizen at community. a glanceMountain Resort, or the International Airport. BolderBoulder. Buses and trains connect and the metro trainsarea and offer an easy way to Denver International Airport. Access-a-Ride Free MallRide Access-a-RideAccess-a-Ride helps meet the Freetravel MallRideneeds of passengers buses with disabilities.Park-n-Rides Access-a-RideFlexRide helps connect the entire length Make connections with meet theFlexRide travel needsbuses travel of within selectof downtown’s RTD service areas.16th Catch FlexRideour to connect buses toand other trains RTD at bus or passengerstrain with servies disabilities. or get direct accessStreet to shopping Mall. malls, schools, and more.89 Park-n-Rides. SeniorRide SeniorRide buses serve our senior community. Free MallRide FlexRideFree MallRide buses stop everyFree block onMetroRide downtown’s 16th Street Mall.Bike-n-Ride FlexRideFree buses MetroRide travel within Free MetroRide buses Bring your bike with you select RTDFree service MetroRide areas. buses offer convenientoffer convenient connections rush-hour for downtown commuterson the bus along and 18th train. and 19th Connectstreets. to other RTD connections for downtown SportsRides buses or trains or get direct commuters along 18th and Take RTD to a local sporting event, Eldora Mountain Resort, or the BolderBoulder. access toPark-n-Rides shopping malls, 19th streets. schools, Makeand more.connections with our buses and trains at more than 89 Park-n-Rides.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Medium Capacity Transit System Project in Metro Manila, the Republic of the Philippines
    Study on Economic Partnership Projects in Developing Countries in FY2014 Study on Medium Capacity Transit System Project in Metro Manila, The Republic of The Philippines Final Report February 2015 Prepared for: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC Japan External Trade Organization Prepared by: TOSTEMS, Inc. Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Japan Transportation Planning Association Reproduction Prohibited Preface This report shows the result of “Study on Economic Partnership Projects in Developing Countries in FY2014” prepared by the study group of TOSTEMS, Inc., Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. and Japan Transportation Planning Association for Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. This study “Study on Medium Capacity Transit System Project in Metro Manila, The Republic of The Philippines” was conducted to examine the feasibility of the project which construct the medium capacity transit system to approximately 18km route from Sta. Mesa area through Mandaluyong City, Ortigas CBD and reach to Taytay City with project cost of 150 billion Yen. The project aim to reduce traffic congestion, strengthen the east-west axis by installing track-guided transport system and form the railway network with connecting existing and planning lines. We hope this study will contribute to the project implementation, and will become helpful for the relevant parties. February 2015 TOSTEMS, Inc. Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd. Mitsubishi Heavy
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rail and Tram: the European Outlook November 2019
    STATISTICS BRIEF LIGHT RAIL AND TRAM: THE EUROPEAN OUTLOOK NOVEMBER 2019 INTRODUCTION Tram and light rail systems are available in 389 cit- evolution of light rail transit (LRT) in Europe since ies around the world, with more than half of them 20151, and provides a snapshot of the situation in (204) in Europe. This Statistics Brief describes the 2018. BALTIC/ NORDIC BENELUX REGION BRITISH 12 cities GERMANY 10 cities ISLES 482 km 49 cities 645 km 9 cities 375 m pax/y. 2,966 km 700 m pax/y. 356 km 2,908 m pax/y. 196 m pax/y. POLAND 15 cities 979 km FRANCE 1,051 m pax/y. 28 cities 827 km 1,104 m pax/y. SOUTH- EASTERN WESTERN CENTRAL EUROPE MEDITERRANEAN 29 cities 29 cities EUROPE 992 km 23 cities 809 km 1,277 m pax/y. 1,240 km 623 m pax/y. 2,188 m pax/y. 1 UITP collects rail data according to a three-year cycle (Metro, LRT and Regional & Suburban Railways) 1 A REMARKABLE RENAISSANCE 180 LRT has experienced a renaissance since the new millen- 160 nium, with no less than 108 new cities (re)opening their 140 first line, of which 60 are from Europe. This does not in- 120 Asia-Pacific clude new lines in existing systems and line extensions. 100 Eurasia Europe 80 40 450 South America 60 35 400 MENA & Africa 7 40 350 North America 30 +56% 20 6 300 25 3 2 250 0 2 4 20 2 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 10 1 5 200 15 1 6 1 150 1 1 Figure 3: Evolution of LRT development (km) 2 10 1 19 19 5 100 4 2 15 11 1 5 50 2 7 5 3 0 0 RIDERSHIP pre-1985 1985-89 1990-94 1995-99 2000-04 2005-09 2010-14 2015-19 Europe North America South America With a total annual ridership in Europe of 10,422 million Eurasia Asia-Pacific MENA & Africa in 2018, LRT carries as many passengers as metros and Cumulative # systems regional/commuter rail, and 10 times more passengers 2 Figure 1: LRT system opening per half-decade, 1985-2019 than air travel in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Passenger Rail Primer
    Passenger Rail Primer Thurston Passenger Rail Workgroup November 2005 Passenger Rail Characteristics This document is intended as a primer introducing and familiarizing the reader with the basic definitions of passenger rail and providing a comparison of common transit services in 2005. It was developed to facilitate a discussion of passenger rail and other transit options in the Thurston Region, in preparation of a regional rail plan. In the next section, Passenger Rail Overview, the fundamental characteristics of light rail, commuter rail and intercity rail are covered. Complementary and Alternative Transit Options (primarily common bus transit choices) provides a wider transit context within which the passenger rail modes coordinate and compete. After investigating transit options individually, they are compared and contrasted in a chart of their characteristics, Summarizing the Continuum of Services. Other Rail Transit Technologies provides a brief overview of less extensively used rail options and the Appendices provide additional details and information. Additional resources the reader may want to consult include: • The American Public Transportation Association (APTA) website at www.apta.com • The Victoria Transportation Policy Institute (VTPI) website at www.vtpi.org • Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) website at www.bts.gov Passenger Rail Overview Introduction Passenger rail modes may be distinguished from one another based on a variety of characteristics – level of service, technology, right-of-way and operations. These characteristics are discussed in more detail in the other sections of this chapter. Like other transit services, however, in the most basic sense passenger rail modes break down by three distinct geographies – local, regional, and statewide or interstate.
    [Show full text]