DOCSLIB.ORG

Light Rail and Tram: the European Outlook November 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

STATISTICS BRIEF LIGHT RAIL AND TRAM: THE EUROPEAN OUTLOOK NOVEMBER 2019 INTRODUCTION Tram and light rail systems are available in 389 cit- evolution of light rail transit (LRT) in Europe since ies around the world, with more than half of them 20151, and provides a snapshot of the situation in (204) in Europe. This Statistics Brief describes the 2018. BALTIC/ NORDIC BENELUX REGION BRITISH 12 cities GERMANY 10 cities ISLES 482 km 49 cities 645 km 9 cities 375 m pax/y. 2,966 km 700 m pax/y. 356 km 2,908 m pax/y. 196 m pax/y. POLAND 15 cities 979 km FRANCE 1,051 m pax/y. 28 cities 827 km 1,104 m pax/y. SOUTH- EASTERN WESTERN CENTRAL EUROPE MEDITERRANEAN 29 cities 29 cities EUROPE 992 km 23 cities 809 km 1,277 m pax/y. 1,240 km 623 m pax/y. 2,188 m pax/y. 1 UITP collects rail data according to a three-year cycle (Metro, LRT and Regional & Suburban Railways) 1 A REMARKABLE RENAISSANCE 180 LRT has experienced a renaissance since the new millen- 160 nium, with no less than 108 new cities (re)opening their 140 first line, of which 60 are from Europe. This does not in- 120 Asia-Pacific clude new lines in existing systems and line extensions. 100 Eurasia Europe 80 40 450 South America 60 35 400 MENA & Africa 7 40 350 North America 30 +56% 20 6 300 25 3 2 250 0 2 4 20 2 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 10 1 5 200 15 1 6 1 150 1 1 Figure 3: Evolution of LRT development (km) 2 10 1 19 19 5 100 4 2 15 11 1 5 50 2 7 5 3 0 0 RIDERSHIP pre-1985 1985-89 1990-94 1995-99 2000-04 2005-09 2010-14 2015-19 Europe North America South America With a total annual ridership in Europe of 10,422 million Eurasia Asia-Pacific MENA & Africa in 2018, LRT carries as many passengers as metros and Cumulative # systems regional/commuter rail, and 10 times more passengers 2 Figure 1: LRT system opening per half-decade, 1985-2019 than air travel in Europe. The small railways certainly do not play a small role in the sustainability of European cit- ies. The symbolic threshold of 10 billion passengers per annum was reached in 2016. GermanyRidership and Central (m. Europepassengers) make up half of all patron- age, theRidership rest being distributed (m. passengers) as shown on Figure 4. GerGemanyrmany 3% 3% 6% 6% CentralCentral Eur Euoperope 2% 2% 28%28% 7% 7% South-EasteSouth-Eastern Eurnr Euoperope 10% FranceFrance © Katatonia 10% PolandPoland Between 2015 and 2018, 420 km of new LRT opened in BeneluxBenelux Europe. This makes up 36% of LRT line openings world- 11%11% New LRT Infrastructure (km, 2015-18) Western Mediterranean wide. 2017 was a watershed year as, for the first time, Western Mediterranean 21%21% Nordic/Baltic greenfield LRT projects in Asia-Pacific exceeded those 12%12% Nordic/Baltic in Europe. BritishBritish Isles Isles Figure 4: Ridership distribution3 (m. passengers), 2018 34 Asia-Pacific 267.2 197.5 Eurasia 10,500 10,422 Europe 10,400 10,300 30.3 South America 10,288 135.4 10,200 MENA 10,100 10,119 10,000 68.1 North America 9,900 9,800 420.5 Africa 9,753 9,700 2015 2016 2017 2018 Figure 2: New LRT infrastructure (km), 2014-2018 Figure 5: Ridership evolution in Europe (m. passengers), 2015-2018 2 Eurostat, 2017 3 2017 data used for France, Poland and Switzerland 2 Patronage data for 2018 is not yet available for all coun- tries (France, Poland and Switzerland are missing). How- ever, extrapolation yields a ridership growth of 6.9 % from 9,740 million in 2015 to 10,422 million passengers between 2015 and 2018 (See Figure 5). Demand growth is therefore 50% higher than the supply growth (km of line) over the same period of time, and signals a positive response from the travelling public. Figure 6 shows different ridership evolution according to regions, ranging from a strong 17.5 % in the British Isles, where infrastructure growth was also the strongest, to 1.5% in Poland. 3500 3000 +5% 2500 +5% 2000 1500 +12% +10.4% +1.5% 1000 +12% +4.5% © Transport for Greater Manchester 500 +13.5% +17.5% LRT popularity is best measured by the annual number of 0 Germany Central South France Poland Benelux Western Nordic/ British Europe Eastern Mediter- Baltic Isles LRT trips per inhabitant per year. The annual use ranges Europe -ranean from 10 to 182 trips and can be explained by a variety of Figure 6: Ridership evolution by region (m. passengers) 2015-2018 4 factors, mainly by the system development and sophis- tication. With a ridership growth of 6.9% between 2015 and 2018, demand growth is 50% higher than the supply Annual LRT trips / inhabitant 200 growth. 180 182 Data about passenger-kilometers is available for 17 160 169 countries. The average LRT journey in Europe is 3.27km. 140 138 120 Luxemburg 1.75 European Switzerland 2.14 average 100 Bosnia Herzegovina 2.20 80 87 Greece 2.26 60 Serbia 2.41 56 Spain 2.81 40 44 Estonia 2.93 20 Hungary 3.10 20 12 10 France (Paris) 3.13 0 Central Poland Germany Benelux Nordic/ France South- Western British Isles Netherlands 3.20 Europe Baltic Eastern Mediter- Europe Italy 3.52 -ranean Germany 3.90 Austria 3.92 Figure 8: Number of LRT trips per year per inhabitant, 2017 Norway 3.95 Sweden 4.24 Portugal 4.40 The busiest LRT network is Budapest, Hungary, with 427 UK 4.75 million passengers. All systems in Figure 9 are long-es- 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 tablished tram networks. The only exception is Paris Figure 7: Average distance per trip in selected countries (km), 2017 where LRT was re-introduced almost 30 years ago. 4 Please note, the outlined bars indicate estimations 3 18 900 16 800 Budapest 411 Prague 372 14 700 Vienna 306 12 600 Paris 300 10 500 Warsaw 277 08 400 Cologne 213 Zurich 208 06 300 Berlin 197 Average line length (km) 04 200 Zagreb 197 Average distance between stops (m) 02 100 Brno 196 00 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 ope ope many France Benelux Poland British Isles dic/Baltic Ger n Eur Nor n Mediterranean Central Eur ester Figure 9: Top-10 busiest LRT systems in Europe (m. passengers), 2017 W South-Easter INFRASTRUCTURE Figure 11: LRT network characteristics, 2018 Between 2015 and 2018, LRT infrastructure in Europe grew by 3.9% from 8,943 km to 9,296 km. The longest LRT network in Europe is Berlin (193 km) +2.5% reaching third place worldwide after Melbourne (250km) 3,000 and Saint Petersburg (246km). 2,500 Top-10 longest LRT Europe (km) 2,000 Berlin 193.2 1,500 +1.5% Milan 180.2 +1% +5.5% 1,000 +8.5% +4.5% +4% Vienna 178 +9.5% 500 +8.7% Budapest 160 Düsseldorf 155.3 00 dic/ Cologne 148.7 many France British Central Poland Benelux Nor Isles Ger Europe estern Baltic W Brussels 147.6 South - Eastern Mediterranean Europe Leipzig 145.6 Figure 10: Evolution of line length in Europe (km), 2015-2018 Prague 142.7 There are notable differences between network struc- Paris 139 tures across the countries. While the European average 0 50 100 150 200 250 lies at 7.3 km, lines tend to be longer on average in coun- tries with newer systems and limited number of lines, Figure 12: Top-10 longest LRT systems in Europe (km), 2018 while older and more complex systems feature lower av- erage line length. © UITP 4 MOBILE ASSET The fleet available to operate the 1,276 LRT lines in Eu- rope consists of 20,754 trams and light rail vehicles. Germany Germany 5% Central Europe 7% 5% Central Europe 2% 24% Poland 7% 24% Poland 7% 2% 7% South-EasteSouth-Eastern Europern Europe 8% 8% WesteWresten Mediterraneanrn Mediterranean Benelux 12% 20% Benelux 12% 20% France France 15% Nordic/Baltic 15% BritishNo Islesrdic/Baltic British Isles Figure 13: Distribution of mobile assets by European regions, 2018 Currently 51% of the total installed fleet in Europe are partial or full low-floorLow-floor vehicles vehicles per, rwithegions 100% of the fleet in France, Spain, Ireland, UK and Norway being low-floor 3,500 vehicles. 120% © Leonid Andronov 3,000 100% 100% A frequent rolling stock KPI is the average yearly mile- 2,500 80% age per unit. The average annual mileage per vehicle in Europe is 52,000 km, ranging between 38,700 km and 2,000 65% 77,500 km. The discrepancy can be partly explained by 59% 60% the fleet age structure. In addition, this value is theo- 57% retical and based on the assumption that all vehicles are 1,500 50% 47% 48% equally used. 40% 1,000 32% 29% 80,000 70,000 20% 500 60,000 European average: 52,000 km 50,000 40,000 Percentage of total fleet Frequency of total fleet 0 0% 30,000 n ope ope many ester 20,000 France Poland Benelux W n Eur Ger dic/Baltic British Isles Nor 10,000 Central Eur Mediterranean South-Easter 0 ope ope many France Poland Benelux British Isles dic/Baltic Ger n Eur Nor Central Eur n Mediterranean ester Figure 14: Low-floor vehicles by regions, 2018 W South-Easter Figure 15: Average annual mileage per light rail vehicle (km), 2018 5 PERSPECTIVE With continued pressure to reduce congestion, tackle However, much attention and resources will go into the air quality in cities and reduce greenhouse gas emission maintenance, modernisation and replacement of assets contributing to climate change, LRT will continue to ob- to keep ageing systems attractive and fit for operational tain support of decision-makers and the travelling public purpose.
Recommended publications
  • Bus and Shared-Ride Taxi Use in Two Small Urban Areas

    Bus and Shared-Ride Taxi Use in Two Small Urban Areas

    Bus and Shared-Ride Taxi Use in Two Small Urban Areas David P. Middendorf, Peat, Marwick, Mitchell and Company Kenneth W. Heathington, University of Tennessee The demand for publicly owned fixed-route. fixed-schedule bus service are used for work and business-related trips to and was compared with tho demand for privately owned shared-ride taxi ser­ within CBDs and for short social, shopping, medical, vice in Davenport. Iowa, and Hicksville, New York, through on-board and personal business trips. surveys end cab company dispatch records and driver logs. The bus and In many small cities and in many suburbs of large slmrcd·ride taxi systems in Davenport com11eted for the off.peak-period travel market. During off-peak hours, the taxis tended to attract social· metropol.il;e:H!:i, l.lus~s nd taxicabs operate within tlie recreation, medical, and per onal business trips between widely scattered same jlu·isclictions and may compete for the same public origins and destinations, while the buses tended 10 attract shopping and transportation market. Two examples of small commu­ personal business trips to the CBD. The shared-ride taxi system in Hicks· nities in which buses and ta.xis coexist are Davenport, ville, in addition to providing many-to·many service, competed with the Iowa, and Hicksville, New York. The markets, eco­ counlywide bus system as a feeder system to the Long Island commuter nomic characteristics, organization, management, and railroad network. In each study area, the markets of each mode of public operation of the taxicab systems sel'Ving these commu­ transportation were similar.
  • Minutes of Claremore Public Works Authority Meeting Council Chambers, City Hall, 104 S

    Minutes of Claremore Public Works Authority Meeting Council Chambers, City Hall, 104 S

    MINUTES OF CLAREMORE PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 104 S. MUSKOGEE, CLAREMORE, OKLAHOMA MARCH 03, 2008 CALL TO ORDER Meeting called to order by Mayor Brant Shallenburger at 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Nan Pope called roll. The following were: Present: Brant Shallenburger, Buddy Robertson, Tony Mullenger, Flo Guthrie, Mick Webber, Terry Chase, Tom Lehman, Paula Watson Absent: Don Myers Staff Present: City Manager Troy Powell, Nan Pope, Serena Kauk, Matt Mueller, Randy Elliott, Cassie Sowers, Phil Stowell, Steve Lett, Daryl Golbek, Joe Kays, Gene Edwards, Tim Miller, Tamryn Cluck, Mark Dowler Pledge of Allegiance by all. Invocation by James Graham, Verdigris United Methodist Church. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA Motion by Mullenger, second by Lehman that the agenda for the regular CPWA meeting of March 03, 2008, be approved as written. 8 yes, Mullenger, Lehman, Robertson, Guthrie, Shallenburger, Webber, Chase, Watson. ITEMS UNFORESEEN AT THE TIME AGENDA WAS POSTED None CALL TO THE PUBLIC None CURRENT BUSINESS Motion by Mullenger, second by Lehman to approve the following consent items: (a) Minutes of Claremore Public Works Authority meeting on February 18, 2008, as printed. (b) All claims as printed. (c) Approve budget supplement for upgrading the electric distribution system and adding an additional Substation for the new Oklahoma Plaza Development - $586,985 - Leasehold improvements to new project number assignment. (Serena Kauk) (d) Approve budget supplement for purchase of an additional concrete control house for new Substation #5 for Oklahoma Plaza Development - $93,946 - Leasehold improvements to new project number assignment. (Serena Kauk) (e) Approve budget supplement for electrical engineering contract with Ledbetter, Corner and Associates for engineering design phase for Substation #5 - Oklahoma Plaza Development - $198,488 - Leasehold improvements to new project number assignment.
  • Sounder Commuter Rail (Seattle)

    Sounder Commuter Rail (Seattle)

    Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Final Report PRC 14-12 F Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Texas A&M Transportation Institute PRC 14-12 F December 2014 Authors Jolanda Prozzi Rydell Walthall Megan Kenney Jeff Warner Curtis Morgan Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 8 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 9 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 10 Sharing Rail Infrastructure ........................................................................................................ 10 Three Scenarios for Sharing Rail Infrastructure ................................................................... 10 Shared-Use Agreement Components .................................................................................... 12 Freight Railroad Company Perspectives ............................................................................... 12 Keys to Negotiating Successful Shared-Use Agreements .................................................... 13 Rail Infrastructure Relocation ................................................................................................... 15 Benefits of Infrastructure Relocation ...................................................................................
  • A Study on Connectivity and Accessibility Between Tram Stops and Public Facilities: a Case Study in the Historic Cities of Europe

    A Study on Connectivity and Accessibility Between Tram Stops and Public Facilities: a Case Study in the Historic Cities of Europe

    Urban Street Design & Planning 73 A study on connectivity and accessibility between tram stops and public facilities: a case study in the historic cities of Europe Y. Kitao1 & K. Hirano2 1Kyoto Women’s University, Japan 2Kei Atelier, Yame, Fukuoka, Japan Abstract The purpose of this paper is to understand urban structures in terms of tram networks by using the examples of historic cities in Europe. We have incorporated the concept of interconnectivity and accessibility between public facilities and tram stops to examine how European cities, which have built world class public transportation systems, use the tram network in relationship to their public facilities. We selected western European tram-type cities which have a bus system, but no subway system, and we focused on 24 historic cities with populations from 100,000 to 200,000, which is the optimum size for a large-scale community. In order to analyze the relationship, we mapped the ‘pedestrian accessible area’ from any tram station in the city, and analyzed how many public facilities and pedestrian streets were in this area. As a result, we were able to compare the urban space structures of these cities in terms of the accessibility and connectivity between their tram stops and their public facilities. Thus we could understand the features which determined the relationship between urban space and urban facilities. This enabled us to evaluate which of our target cities was the most pedestrian orientated city. Finally, we were able to define five categories of tram-type cities. These findings have provided us with a means to recognize the urban space structure of a city, which will help us to improve city planning in Japan.
  • Los Angeles Transportation Transit History – South LA

    Los Angeles Transportation Transit History – South LA

    Los Angeles Transportation Transit History – South LA Matthew Barrett Metro Transportation Research Library, Archive & Public Records - metro.net/library Transportation Research Library & Archive • Originally the library of the Los • Transportation research library for Angeles Railway (1895-1945), employees, consultants, students, and intended to serve as both academics, other government public outreach and an agencies and the general public. employee resource. • Partner of the National • Repository of federally funded Transportation Library, member of transportation research starting Transportation Knowledge in 1971. Networks, and affiliate of the National Academies’ Transportation • Began computer cataloging into Research Board (TRB). OCLC’s World Catalog using Library of Congress Subject • Largest transit operator-owned Headings and honoring library, forth largest transportation interlibrary loan requests from library collection after U.C. outside institutions in 1978. Berkeley, Northwestern University and the U.S. DOT’s Volpe Center. • Archive of Los Angeles transit history from 1873-present. • Member of Getty/USC’s L.A. as Subject forum. Accessing the Library • Online: metro.net/library – Library Catalog librarycat.metro.net – Daily aggregated transportation news headlines: headlines.metroprimaryresources.info – Highlights of current and historical documents in our collection: metroprimaryresources.info – Photos: flickr.com/metrolibraryarchive – Film/Video: youtube/metrolibrarian – Social Media: facebook, twitter, tumblr, google+,
  • The Neighborly Substation the Neighborly Substation Electricity, Zoning, and Urban Design

    The Neighborly Substation the Neighborly Substation Electricity, Zoning, and Urban Design

    MANHATTAN INSTITUTE CENTER FORTHE RETHINKING DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORLY SUBstATION Hope Cohen 2008 er B ecem D THE NEIGHBORLY SUBstATION THE NEIGHBORLY SUBstATION Electricity, Zoning, and Urban Design Hope Cohen Deputy Director Center for Rethinking Development Manhattan Institute In 1879, the remarkable thing about Edison’s new lightbulb was that it didn’t burst into flames as soon as it was lit. That disposed of the first key problem of the electrical age: how to confine and tame electricity to the point where it could be usefully integrated into offices, homes, and every corner of daily life. Edison then designed and built six twenty-seven-ton, hundred-kilowatt “Jumbo” Engine-Driven Dynamos, deployed them in lower Manhattan, and the rest is history. “We will make electric light so cheap,” Edison promised, “that only the rich will be able to burn candles.” There was more taming to come first, however. An electrical fire caused by faulty wiring seriously FOREWORD damaged the library at one of Edison’s early installations—J. P. Morgan’s Madison Avenue brownstone. Fast-forward to the massive blackout of August 2003. Batteries and standby generators kicked in to keep trading alive on the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ. But the Amex failed to open—it had backup generators for the trading-floor computers but depended on Consolidated Edison to cool them, so that they wouldn’t melt into puddles of silicon. Banks kept their ATM-control computers running at their central offices, but most of the ATMs themselves went dead. Cell-phone service deteriorated fast, because soaring call volumes quickly drained the cell- tower backup batteries.
  • Where Steam Engines Meet Sandstone

    Where Steam Engines Meet Sandstone

    TIMETABLE 2 01 9 Where steam engines meet sandstone. 1 Experience boat travel Established 1836! Dear Guests, Steamboat 90 years Leipzig With its nine historical paddle steamers, the Sächsische Dampfschif- Put into service: 11.05.1929 fahrt is the oldest and largest steamboat fleet in the world. In excep- tional manner and depth, this service combines riverside experience, Steamboat Dresden technical fascination and culinary delight. While you are amazed by Put into service: 02.07.1926 the incomparable Elbe landscape with the imposing rock formations in Saxon Switzerland, the impressive buildings of Dresden and Meissen, Steamboat Pillnitz and the delightful wine region between Radebeul and Diesbar-Seusslitz Put into service: 16.05.1886 you can also enjoy regional and seasonal food and beverages. Whether travelling with the lovingly restored paddle steamers or with the air- Steamboat Meissen conditioned salon ships, lean back and enjoy the breathtaking views. Put into service: 17.05.1885 We would like to impress you with our comprehensive offer of expe- riences and hope to continually surprise you. With this I would like to Steamboat 140 wish you an all-encompassing, relaxing trip on board. years Stadt Wehlen Put into service: 18.05.1879 Yours, Karin Hildebrand Steamboat Pirna Put into service: 22.05.1898 Steamboat Kurort Rathen contents Put into service: 02.05.1896 En route in Dresden city area 4 Steamboat Our special event trips 8 Krippen Put into service: 05.06.1892 Winter and Christmas Cruises 22 En route in and around Meissen 26 Steamboat En route in Saxon Switzerland 28 Diesbar Put into service: 15.05.1884 Our KombiTickets 32 Dresden’s “Terrassenufer” under steam 40 Motor ship 25 Anniversary ships 42 years August der Starke put into service: 19.05.1994 Historic Calendar 44 Souvenirs & Co.
  • Stadt-Umland-Bahnen – Beispiele Aus

    Stadt-Umland-Bahnen – Beispiele Aus

    Hartmut Topp topp.plan: Stadt.Verkehr.Moderation TU KAISERSLAUTERN imove Stadt-Umland-Bahnen: Beispiele aus Deutschland & Frankreich Informationsveranstaltung der IHK Nürnberg für Mittelfranken und des IHK-Gremiums Erlangen am 22. Februar 2016 in Erlangen ll topp.plan: Stadt .Verkehr. Moderation itopp.plan Manchester Kiel Hasselt/Maastricht Rostock Den Haag Bondy/Paris Bremen Grenoble Ausbau Nantes Montpellier Straßen-/Stadtbahn Köln/Bonn Chemnitz Kassel Zwickau StadtRegionalBahn Regiotram Stadt-Umland-Bahn Rhein- Erlangen Neckar Saarbahn tram-train Karlsruher Modell Strasbourg Neckar-Alb in Betrieb Mulhouse Salzburg geplant Basel im Ausland Kopenhagen Manchester Kiel Hasselt/Maastricht Rostock Den Haag Bondy/Paris Bremen Grenoble Ausbau Nantes Montpellier Straßen-/Stadtbahn kommen Reims im Vortrag vor Köln/Bonn Chemnitz Kassel Zwickau StadtRegionalBahn Regiotram Stadt-Umland-Bahn Rhein- Erlangen Neckar Saarbahn tram-train Karlsruher Modell Strasbourg Neckar-Alb in Betrieb Mulhouse Salzburg geplant Basel Zürich im Ausland Querschnitte Fahrgastentwicklung 663 km Netzlänge AVG, 2015 ll Institut für Mobilität & Verkehr topp.plan: Stadt .Verkehr. Moderation itopp.plan Erste Strecke 1992: Karlsruhe - Bretten 16.000 x 8 2.000 x 3 x 4,8 x 1,8 x 6,2 AVG, 2015 ll Institut für Mobilität & Verkehr topp.plan: Stadt .Verkehr. Moderation itopp.plan Tramlinien / StUB-Linien ziehen bei gleichem Linienverlauf & gleichem Fahrplantakt deutlich mehr Fahrgäste an als Buslinien . Das ist empirisch mehrfach belegt . Wir nennen das Tram- oder Schienenbonus . Bonus bis etwa 50 %, manchmal mehr . Warum ist das so? Hoher Fahrkomfort Verlässliche Reisezeit ohne Stau Hohe Sitzplatzerwartung Urbanes Image und Prestige Leichte Orientierung ll Institut für Mobilität & Verkehr topp.plan: Stadt .Verkehr. Moderation itopp.plan 1 Multimodal unterwegs 2 Städtebauliche Einbindung 2.1 Fahrwege einer StUB 2.2 Stromversorgung 2.3 Kleine & große Haltestellen 3 Baustellenmanagement 4 Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung ll Institut für Mobilität & Verkehr topp.plan: Stadt .Verkehr.
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet

    National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet

    RECEIVED 2280 NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) Oregon WordPerfect 6.0 Format (Revised July 1998) National Register of Historic Places iC PLACES Registration Form • NATIONAL : A SERVICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking Y in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A"for "not applicable. For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name The La Grande Commercial Historic District other names/site number N/A 2. Location street & number Roughly bounded by the U.P Railroad tracts along Jefferson St, on __not for publication the north; Greenwood and Cove streets on the east; Washington St. on __ vicinity the south; & Fourth St. on the west. city or town La Grande state Oregon code OR county Union code 61 zip code 97850 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ^nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
  • Passenger Rail Primer

    Passenger Rail Primer

    Passenger Rail Primer Thurston Passenger Rail Workgroup November 2005 Passenger Rail Characteristics This document is intended as a primer introducing and familiarizing the reader with the basic definitions of passenger rail and providing a comparison of common transit services in 2005. It was developed to facilitate a discussion of passenger rail and other transit options in the Thurston Region, in preparation of a regional rail plan. In the next section, Passenger Rail Overview, the fundamental characteristics of light rail, commuter rail and intercity rail are covered. Complementary and Alternative Transit Options (primarily common bus transit choices) provides a wider transit context within which the passenger rail modes coordinate and compete. After investigating transit options individually, they are compared and contrasted in a chart of their characteristics, Summarizing the Continuum of Services. Other Rail Transit Technologies provides a brief overview of less extensively used rail options and the Appendices provide additional details and information. Additional resources the reader may want to consult include: • The American Public Transportation Association (APTA) website at www.apta.com • The Victoria Transportation Policy Institute (VTPI) website at www.vtpi.org • Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) website at www.bts.gov Passenger Rail Overview Introduction Passenger rail modes may be distinguished from one another based on a variety of characteristics – level of service, technology, right-of-way and operations. These characteristics are discussed in more detail in the other sections of this chapter. Like other transit services, however, in the most basic sense passenger rail modes break down by three distinct geographies – local, regional, and statewide or interstate.
  • 2O2o Annual Report

    2O2o Annual Report

    COMMUNITY & COMMITMENT 2O2O ANNUAL REPORT DEAR DOWNTOWN STAKEHOLDER It is with deep pride and steadfast commitment that we share with you the 2020 Annual Report for the Downtown Center Business Improvement District (DCBID). Looking back at the most difficult year in our District’s history, we can say with renewed confidence that our organization, and our community, is resilient, resourceful, and built to last. While Downtown Los Angeles (DTLA), like cities across the globe, faced unprecedented circumstances due to the impacts of COVID-19, the core services that the DCBID has provided to its property owners since its inception in 1998 helped keep the District safe, clean, and viable throughout the year, and helped position us for recovery and revitalization as the pandemic begins to recede. Deemed essential workers at the start of the shutdown, our Safe and Clean Teams maintained its commitment to the highest standards of hygiene, sanitation, and safety across the District, 24/7, through months of extremely challenging conditions. In 2020, they responded to over 24,563 calls for service, and removed over 69,766 bags of trash and over 18,108 instances of graffiti. Working with our Homeless Outreach teams, our Safe and Clean teams continued their tireless efforts without interruption, proving just how essential they truly are. Nurturing a sense of community in the District is a key element of our mission and was never more critical than during this crisis. In the distinct absence of office workers and visitors, the District’s residential community filled the void, showing its strength and commitment by supporting local businesses, helping clean-up efforts following demonstrations and celebrations, and just keeping the lights on during a very dark period.
  • CAPITAL REGION RAIL VISION from Baltimore to Richmond, Creating a More Unified, Competitive, Modern Rail Network

    CAPITAL REGION RAIL VISION from Baltimore to Richmond, Creating a More Unified, Competitive, Modern Rail Network

    Report CAPITAL REGION RAIL VISION From Baltimore to Richmond, Creating a More Unified, Competitive, Modern Rail Network DECEMBER 2020 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXISTING REGIONAL RAIL NETWORK 10 THE VISION 26 BIDIRECTIONAL RUN-THROUGH SERVICE 28 EXPANDED SERVICE 29 SEAMLESS RIDER EXPERIENCE 30 SUPERIOR OPERATIONAL INTEGRATION 30 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM 31 VISION ANALYSIS 32 IMPLEMENTATION AND NEXT STEPS 47 KEY STAKEHOLDER IMPLEMENTATION ROLES 48 NEXT STEPS 51 APPENDICES 55 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The decisions that we as a region make in the next five years will determine whether a more coordinated, integrated regional rail network continues as a viable possibility or remains a missed opportunity. The Capital Region’s economic and global Railway Express (VRE) and Amtrak—leaves us far from CAPITAL REGION RAIL NETWORK competitiveness hinges on the ability for residents of all incomes to have easy and Perryville Martinsburg reliable access to superb transit—a key factor Baltimore Frederick Penn Station in attracting and retaining talent pre- and Camden post-pandemic, as well as employers’ location Yards decisions. While expansive, the regional rail network represents an untapped resource. Washington The Capital Region Rail Vision charts a course Union Station to transform the regional rail network into a globally competitive asset that enables a more Broad Run / Airport inclusive and equitable region where all can be proud to live, work, grow a family and build a business. Spotsylvania to Richmond Main Street Station Relative to most domestic peer regions, our rail network is superior in terms of both distance covered and scope of service, with over 335 total miles of rail lines1 and more world-class service.