DOCSLIB.ORG

House of Representatives 96Th Legislature REGULAR SESSION of 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
House of Representatives 96Th Legislature REGULAR SESSION of 2012 No. 61 STATE OF MICHIGAN JOURNAL OF THE House of Representatives 96th Legislature REGULAR SESSION OF 2012 House Chamber, Lansing, Wednesday, June 13, 2012. 10:00 a.m. The House was called to order by the Speaker. The roll was called by the Clerk of the House of Representatives, who announced that a quorum was present. Agema—present Gilbert—present LeBlanc—present Price—present Ananich—present Glardon—present Lindberg—present Pscholka—present Barnett—present Goike—present Lipton—present Rendon—present Bauer—present Graves—present Liss—present Rogers—present Bledsoe—present Greimel—present Lori—present Rutledge—present Bolger—present Haines—present Lund—present Santana—present Brown—present Hammel—present Lyons—present Schmidt, R.—present Brunner—present Haugh—present MacGregor—present Schmidt, W.—present Bumstead—present Haveman—present MacMaster—present Segal—present Byrum—present Heise—present McBroom—present Shaughnessy—present Callton—present Hobbs—present McCann—present Shirkey—present Cavanagh—present Hooker—present McMillin—present Slavens—present Clemente—present Horn—present Meadows—present Smiley—present Constan—present Hovey-Wright—present Moss—present Somerville—present Cotter—present Howze—present Muxlow—present Stallworth—present Crawford—present Hughes—present Nathan—present Stamas—present Daley—present Huuki—present Nesbitt—present Stanley—present Damrow—present Irwin—present O’Brien—present Stapleton—present Darany—present Jackson—present Oakes—present Switalski—present Denby—present Jacobsen—present Olson—present Talabi—present Dillon—present Jenkins—present Olumba—present Tlaib—present Durhal—present Johnson—present Opsommer—present Townsend—present Farrington—present Kandrevas—present Ouimet—present Tyler—present Forlini—present Knollenberg—present Outman—present Walsh—present Foster—present Kowall—present Pettalia—present Womack—present Franz—present Kurtz—present Poleski—present Yonker—present Geiss—present LaFontaine—present Potvin—present Zorn—present Genetski—present Lane—present e/d/s = entered during session 1810 JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE [June 13, 2012] [No. 61 Chaplain Rev. Major Lawrence L. Vollink, Chaplain of Michigan Wing Chaplain Civil Air Patrol, offered the following invocation: “For all of our honorable Representatives and staff, we pray, Eternal God, we thank You for all of Your blessings You have bestowed upon us, especially for this great state of Michigan that we are privileged to serve. Be with all of our leaders who are making the decisions that affect us. Endow them with courage and conviction, adding wisdom to their knowledge, flavoring it with a dose of humility. May our motivations be out of our love for all people, and to help them to live peacefully. We ask not for tasks suited to our strength, but we ask for Your strength for any task that You have given to each of us to accomplish. Help us to live in knowledge that You have matched us to this hour in history, and that the place and time of our service to You and to our country is not random, but by Your wisdom and direction. Walk close to our Representatives, so that they may not fail. Keep them pure in heart, clean in mind, and strong in purpose. Remind us, Lord, that Your Wisdom is not found in an hour, a day, or a year, but in a process that lasts a lifetime with You by our side. We ask for patience and understanding as our Representatives serve our great state of Michigan. Watch over our Armed Forces this day and always. You, O Lord are our strength and shield. Bless us with Your abiding presence now and forever. AMEN.” ______ The Speaker called the Speaker Pro Tempore to the Chair. ______ Rep. Stamas moved that House Committees be given leave to meet during the balance of today’s session. The motion prevailed. Motions and Resolutions Reps. Barnett, Smiley, Brunner, Irwin, Kandrevas, McCann, Haugh, Darany, Dillon, Geiss, Damrow, Daley, Rendon, O’Brien, Hobbs, Liss, Howze, Stallworth, Rutledge, Santana, Wayne Schmidt, Bauer, Cavanagh, Constan, Glardon, Haines, Heise, Johnson, Knollenberg, Kurtz, LeBlanc, Lipton, Roy Schmidt, Segal, Slavens, Switalski, Talabi and Tyler offered the following resolution: House Resolution No. 292. A resolution to declare June 25-29, 2012, as Service Disabled Veterans Business Awareness Week in the state of Michigan. Whereas, The state of Michigan honors the extraordinary service rendered to the United States by veterans with disabilities incurred or aggravated in the line of duty during active service with the armed forces; and Whereas, The people of the state of Michigan recognize the unique challenges faced by military veterans, specifically those injured in the line of duty, and their families upon returning from active service to life as a civilian; and Whereas, The people of the state of Michigan are committed to ensuring that the men and women of the United States armed forces have access to quality employment opportunities upon completing their service to our nation; and Whereas, The US Census Bureau reports that Michigan is home to at least 110,000 service disabled veterans; and Whereas, In 2011, the unemployment rate of 14.4% among Michigan veterans was far greater than the statewide unemploy- ment rate; and Whereas, The unemployment rate among service disabled veterans is estimated to be significantly higher; and Whereas, In the United States there 3,670,318 veteran-owned businesses and a significant number of these businesses are owned by disabled service veterans; and Whereas, Veteran-owned businesses are largely committed to hiring service disabled veterans; and Whereas, In 2005, Governor Granholm signed PA 91 into law which establishes a goal of awarding 3% of all state contracts to service disabled veteran-owned businesses; and Whereas, In 2008, PA 133 raised that goal to 5% of all state contracts; and Whereas, To date, the Michigan Department of Technology, Management, and Budget has awarded less than 1% of contracts to service disabled veteran owned businesses; and No. 61] [June 13, 2012] JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE 1811 Whereas, It is incumbent upon this legislature to see that the state recommits itself to achieving the goals set forth in PA 91 of 2005 and PA 133 of 2008; and Whereas, On June 26-June 29, 2012, the National Veterans Small Business Conference will be hosted in Detroit. This conference presents an excellent opportunity for representatives of the state to connect with service disabled business owners; now, therefore, be it Resolved by the House of Representatives, That the members of this legislative body declare June 25-29, 2012, as Service Disabled Veterans Business Awareness Week in the state of Michigan. The question being on the adoption of the resolution, The resolution was adopted. Reps. Darany, Tlaib, Constan, Meadows, Cavanagh, Lindberg, Barnett, Heise, Knollenberg, Liss, Roy Schmidt, Slavens, Switalski and Talabi offered the following resolution: House Resolution No. 293. A resolution to offer best wishes to Muslims in Michigan and worldwide on the joyous and meaningful observance of Ramadan, a month of reflection and prayer. Whereas, There are approximately 1.6 billion Muslims worldwide, which is more than 23 percent of the world’s popula- tion. One of the largest and most productive populations resides in southeast Michigan and observes the holy month of Ramadan; and Whereas, This month is observed in dedication to the Islamic principles and in commemoration of the month in which the holy Quran was revealed to prophet Muhammad; and Whereas, Muslims around the world will observe Ramadan by fasting, emphasizing self-discipline, worship, and reading the holy Quran to improve patience, humility, and spirituality; and Whereas, Muslims spend this time in reflection and prayer, while strengthening the bonds of family and friendship; and Whereas, This month of sacrifice and contemplation begins on or about the evening of Thursday, July 19, 2012, and continues until on or about the evening of Saturday, August 18, 2012, with Eid al-Fitr, the celebration of prophet Abraham’s sacrifice; now, therefore, be it Resolved by House of Representatives, That the members of this legislative body offer best wishes to Muslims in Michigan and worldwide on the joyous and meaningful observance of Ramadan, a month of reflection and prayer. The question being on the adoption of the resolution, The resolution was adopted. Reps. Huuki, Foster, McBroom, Lindberg, Bumstead, Barnett, Cavanagh, Constan, Crawford, Darany, Haines, Heise, Johnson, LeBlanc, Liss, Roy Schmidt, Slavens, Switalski, Talabi and Tyler offered the following resolution: House Resolution No. 294. A resolution to urge the President of the United States to declare a major disaster or emergency for areas in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula impacted by the Duck Lake wildfire. Whereas, The Duck Lake fire in Luce County, Michigan, began May 24th following a lightning strike. As of June 6th, the wildfire has covered 21,112 acres and destroyed 49 cabins and homes, including a motel and store; 23 garages; 38 sheds; and 26 campers; and Whereas, The Duck Lake fire is now the third largest forest fire to ever burn in the history of the great state of Michigan; and Whereas, Governor Snyder declared a state of disaster in Luce and Schoolcraft counties on May 25, 2012, to make all state resources available to fight the fire. In addition, Governor Snyder activated the National Guard to provide assistance; and Whereas, The Michigan Department of Natural Resources, in cooperation with state and local partners, has fought in dangerous conditions against the wildfire to protect people, property, and Michigan’s natural resources. One hundred fifty-six people, 16 engines, 5 bulldozers, 4 hand crews, and 1 fixed-wing aircraft have been employed to stop the fire. The tireless and selfless efforts of the professional personnel, countless volunteers, and laypersons helped avert even further property damage and prevented the loss of life; and Whereas, Federal assistance is necessary to supplement state efforts and resources. Michigan’s third largest wildfire has caused extensive damage and irreparably changed people’s lives.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Escribe Agenda Package
    TOWNSHIP OF CHAMPLAIN REGULAR MEETING October 8, 2020 Electronic Participation 1. OPENING - 7:00 P.M. Call to order. 2. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST (on any items that appear on the agenda) 3. ADOPTION OF AGENDA 4. PRESENTATION BY COUNCIL 5. PRESENTATION − COMMITTEES / CONSULTANTS 6. DEPUTATION 7. STAFF REPORTS 7.1. Planning 7.1.1. On-Going Planning Projects 7.1.2. Zoning By-Law Amendment Application - Removal of "Holding" zone (h) - Habitations Robert Inc. 7.1.3. Land Severance Application B-053-2020 - 853853 Ontario Inc. / Andre Desjardins 7.1.4. Land Severance Application B-054-2020 and B-055-2020 - Voith Canada Inc. 7.1.5. Land Severance Application B-056-2020, B-057-2020 et B-058-2020 - Ridge Holdings Inc. / John Russell 7.2. ADOPTION OF PLANNING BY-LAWS 7.2.1. By-Law 2020-62 - to amend Zoning By-Law 2000-75 - Habitations Robert Inc. 7.3. Administration 7.3.1. Administration Report AD-18-2020 - Update on COVID-19 7.3.2. Administration Report AD-19-2020 - Bill 197 - Proxy Voting 7.3.3. Integrity Commissioner's Report 7.4. Finance 7.4.1. Accounts 7.4.2. Finance Report FIN-10-2020 - Water and Sewer Billing Period 7.4.3. Finance Report FIN-11-2020 - User Fees for 2021-2025 7.4.4. Finance Report FIN-12-2020 - 2020 Annual Repayment Limit (ARL) 7.5. Fire Department 7.5.1. District 1 - Monthly Report - September 2020 7.5.2. District 2 - Monthly Report - September 2020 7.6. Parks & Recreation 7.6.1. REC Monthly Report - September 2020 7.7.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Procedural Rules and Orders
    Chapter 4 Procedural Rules and Orders 4.1 Introduction 4-3 A. Applicability of Rules of Civil Procedure in Juvenile Proceedings 1. Rules apply when explicitly required by the Juvenile Code 2. A rule or part of a rule will not apply where the Juvenile Code provides a different procedure 3. Rules or parts of rules apply when required to fill procedural gaps 4. Rules may not be used to confer rights B. Rule Application Analysis 4.2 Procedures Regarding the Petition 4-8 A. Contents of Petition B. Signature of Attorney or Party C. Amended and Supplemental Pleadings 1. Amendments in abuse, neglect, or dependency proceedings 2. Amendments in termination of parental rights proceedings 3. Supplemental pleadings D. Responsive Pleadings 4.3 Summons 4-11 A. Content and Issuance of Summons 1. Signature of clerk 2. Timing 3. Who receives summons 4. Service requirements when summons is not required B. Expiration of Summons 4.4 Service 4-13 A. The Impact of Service B. Summons 1. Service by delivery 2. Service by publication 3. Service in a foreign country C. Notice and Motions 4.5 Continuances 4-21 A. Continuances Disfavored B. Abuse, Neglect, Dependency Proceedings C. Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings D. Considerations 1. Party’s own actions 2. Absence of witness 3. Heavy dockets 4-1 Ch. 4: Procedural Rules and Orders (Dec. 31, 2019) 4-2 4. Time to prepare 5. Delay, prejudice, and the remedy of mandamus 4.6 Discovery 4-24 A. Discovery Generally B. The Juvenile Code and Discovery 1. DSS sharing of information 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual of Patent Practice and Procedure the Patent Office, India
    INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDIA PATENTS || DESIGNS || TRADEMARKS || GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS MANUAL OF PATENT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE THE PATENT OFFICE, INDIA Intellectual Property Office, Mumbai Intellectual Property Office, Delhi Intellectual Property Office, Chennai Intellectual Property Office, Kolkata Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks Boudhik Sampada Bhawan S.M. Road, Antop Hill Mumbai – 400 037. Patent Office, Kolkata (Head Office) Boudhik Sampada Bhawan CP-2, Sector V, Salt Lake City Kolkata – 700 091. Patent Office, Chennai Intellectual Property Building G.S.T. Road, Guindy Chennai – 600 032. Patent Office, Delhi Boudhik Sampada Bhawan Plot No.32, Sector-14, Dwarka New Delhi – 110 075. Patent Office, Mumbai Boudhik Sampada Bhawan S.M. Road, Antop Hill Mumbai – 400 037. Third Edition – 2008 Manual of Patent Practice & Procedure © Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks, India. 2 PREFACE This Manual is intended to provide detailed information to the public and users of Patent System on the practices and procedures followed by Patent Office for processing of patent applications. The Manual incorporates provisions of the Patents Act, 1970 as amended by the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 and the Patents Rules, 2003 as amended by the Patents (Amendment) Rules, 2006. The format of the Manual is to reproduce successive sections and relevant rules of the Patents Act and Patents Rules followed by explanation and past decisions of the Patent Office, wherever available. References to decisions of the courts of India and other countries have been included to provide guidance and help the users. The Manual does not constitute rule making and hence do not have the force and effect of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Internal Rules Rev 9
    EXTRAORDINARY CHAMBERS IN THE COURTS OF CAMBODIA INTERNAL RULES (REV.9) AS REVISED ON 16 January 2015 Table of Contents PREAMBLE ............................................................................................................................. 6 I – PROVISIONS RELATING TO THESE INTERNAL RULES (“IRs”) ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Rule 1. Entry into Force and Interpretation ...................................................................... 7 Rule 2. Procedure Applicable in Case of lacunae in these IRs ........................................ 7 Rule 3. Amendments ........................................................................................................ 7 II – ORGANISATION OF THE COURT ............................................................................. 8 A – General Provisions ...................................................................................................... 8 Rule 4. Administrative Regulations ................................................................................. 8 Rule 5. International Judicial Cooperation and Financial Assistance .............................. 8 Rule 6. Staff Duties and Discipline .................................................................................. 8 Rule 7. Resignation .......................................................................................................... 9 B – The Office of Administration .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3 | 2020 Volume 11 (2020) Issue 3 ISSN 2190-3387
    3 | 2020 Volume 11 (2020) Issue 3 ISSN 2190-3387 Editorial by Lucie Guibault Articles The Concept Of Joint Control Under The Data Protection Law Enforcement Directive 2016/680 In Contrast To The GDPR by Tristan Radtke Demystifying The Role Of Data Interoperability In The Access And Sharing Law and Electronic Commerce Information Technology, Intellectual Property, Journal of Debate by Jörg Hoffmann and Begoña Glez. Otero From Theory To Practice: Exercising The Right Of Access Under The Law Enforcement And PNR Directives by Plixavra Vogiatzoglou, Katherine Quezada Tavárez, Stefano Fantin and Pierre Dewitte Net Neutrality And Free Choice Of Routers And Modems In Europe by Lucas Lasota Direct Copyright Liability As Regulation Of hosting Platforms For The Copyright-Infringing Content Uploaded By Their Users: Quo vadis? by Bianca Hanuz Navigating The Fragmented Online Music Licensing Landscape In Europe – A Legislative Compass In Sight? by Lucius Klobučník Abuse Of Patent Enforcement In Europe: How Can Start-ups And Growth Companies Fight Back? by Krista Rantasaari Editors: Thomas Dreier Axel Metzger Gerald Spindler Lucie Guibault Miquel Peguera Séverine Dusollier Chris Reed www.jipitec.eu Karin Sein Table Of Contents Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Editorial Electronic Commerce Law by Lucie Guibault 241 Volume 11 Issue 3 December 2020 www.jipitec.eu [email protected] A joint publication of: Prof. Dr. Thomas Dreier, M. C. J. (NYU) Articles KIT - Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, Zentrum für Angewandte The Concept Of Joint Control Under The Data Protection Law Enforcement Rechtswissenschaft (ZAR), Directive 2016/680 In Contrast To The GDPR Vincenz-Prießnitz-Str. 3, by Tristan Radke 242 76131 Karlsruhe Germany Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules of Procedure and Evidence* **
    Rules of Procedure and Evidence* ** * Explanatory note: The Rules of Procedure and Evidence are an instrument for the application of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, to which they are subordinate in all cases. In elaborating the Rules of Procedure and Evidence, care has been taken to avoid rephrasing and, to the extent possible, repeating the provisions of the Statute. Direct references to the Statute have been included in the Rules, where appropriate, in order to emphasize the relationship between the Rules and the Rome Statute, as provided for in article 51, in particular, paragraphs 4 and 5. In all cases, the Rules of Procedure and Evidence should be read in conjunction with and subject to the provisions of the Statute. The Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Court do not affect the procedural rules for any national court or legal system for the purpose of national proceedings. ** The Rules of Procedure and Evidence are reproduced from the Official Records of the Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, First session, New York, 3-10 September 2002 (ICC-ASP/1/3 and Corr.1), part II.A. The amendments are reflected via footnotes. Rules of Procedure and Evidence Published by the International Criminal Court ISBN No. 92-9227-278-0 ICC-PIDS-LT-02-002/13_Eng Copyright © International Criminal Court 2013 First edition 2005 Second edition 2013 All rights reserved Printed by PrintPartners Ipskamp, Enschede Cover design: Corps ontwerpers International Criminal Court | Po Box 19519 | 2500 CM | The Hague | The Netherlands | www.icc-cpi.int Rules of Procedure and Evidence Table of Contents Chapter 1.
    [Show full text]
  • When Autonomous Vehicles Are Hacked, Who Is Liable?
    When Autonomous Vehicles Are Hacked, Who Is Liable? Zev Winkelman, Maya Buenaventura, James M. Anderson, Nahom M. Beyene, Pavan Katkar, Gregory Cyril Baumann For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2654 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0323-0 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: Adobe Stock/Production Perig. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report examines the civil liability implications that would flow from hackers commandeering or hacking autonomous vehicles (AVs) and using them to cause harm.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tallinn Manual 2.0: Highlights and Insights
    THE TALLINN MANUAL 2.0: HIGHLIGHTS AND INSIGHTS ERIC TALBOT JENSEN* ABSTRACT Malicious cyber activities are pervasive in the lives of individuals and in the national security discussions of national governments across the globe. It is rare for a day to pass without some cyber event reaching the national news. These malicious cyber activities are attributed to both state and non-state actors such as transnational criminal groups, terrorist organizations, and individuals. In response to this widespread phenomenon, including a specific major cyber incident in Estonia in 2007, the Cooperative Cyber Defense Center of Excellence in Tallinn, Estonia hosted a multi-year process designed to provide the views of a group of renowned experts on the application of international law to cyber activities. The first Tallinn Manual dealt with the law applicable to armed conflict. The second, and recently published, Tallinn Manual (known as Tallinn 2.0) deals with a much broader type of cyber operations—those both in and out of armed conflict. This Article briefly summarizes the key points in the Tallinn Manual 2.0, including identifying some of the most important areas of non-consensus among the Experts who wrote the Manual. The Article then offers some insights into where international law on cyber operations will need to go in the future. I. INTRODUCTION .................................... 736 II. THE PROCESS ..................................... 738 III. THE MANUAL ..................................... 740 A. Sovereignty ................................... 740 B. Due Diligence ................................. 744 C. Jurisdiction ................................... 746 D. Law of International Responsibility .................. 750 E. Cyber Operations Not Per Se Regulated ................ 755 F. International Human Rights Law................... 758 G. Diplomatic and Consular Law ....................
    [Show full text]
  • The Harbin Jewish Community and the Regional Conflicts of Northeast China, 1903-1963
    The Harbin Jewish Community and the Regional Conflicts of Northeast China, 1903-1963 Ming Hui Pan A Thesis In the Department of Religions and Cultures Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Religion) at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada March 2020 © Ming Hui Pan, 2020 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Ming Hui Pan Entitled: The Harbin Jewish Community and the Regional Conflicts of Northeast China, 1903-1963 and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Religion) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final Examining Committee: ___________________________ Chair Dr. Mark Steinberg ___________________________ External Examiner Dr. Kathryn Hellerstein ___________________________ Examiner Dr. Csaba Nickolenyi ___________________________ Examiner Dr. Norman Ravvin ___________________________ Examiner Dr. Marc des Jardins ___________________________ Supervisor Dr. Ira Robinson Approved by _____________________________________________ Dr. Marc des Jardins, Graduate Program Director March 10, 2020 ______________________________________________ Dr. André Roy, Dean, Faculty of Arts and Science ii Abstract The Harbin Jewish Community and the Regional Conflicts of Northeast China, 1903-1963 Ming Hui Pan, Ph.D. Concordia University, 2020 This study examines the historical development of the Harbin Jewish community in Northeast China from its beginning in the early 1900s to its end in the 1960s. Scholars seldom pay enough attention to the Harbin Jewish community, the largest and most influential Jewish community in Asia. This study aims to fill this significant geopolitical gap of the history of Jews in the East.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Agenda – 22 May 2019
    BOARD AGENDA – 22 MAY 2019 ITEM AGENDA ITEM ACTION PRESENTED BY PAGE NO TIME Attendance & 1 Noting Chair 3 Apologies 2 Declaration of Interest Noting Chair - 3 Minutes 5.30pm Minute of Meeting 20 3.1 Approval Chair 5 March 2019 - Chief 3.2 Action Sheet Approval 10 Executive 5.40pm Date of Next Meeting 4 Approval Chair - 19 June 2019 Director of 5 Health & Safety Noting - Operations ITEM AGENDA ITEM ACTION PRESENTED BY PAGE NO TIME 6 Items For Decision Annual Return on the Director of 6.1 Approval 12 Charter 2018/19 F&CS Review of Standing Chief 5.40pm 6.2 Approval 121 Orders Executive - Asset Management Director of 6.10pm 6.3 Approval 184 Strategy Operations Development Chief 6.4 Approval 196 Monitoring Report Executive ITEM AGENDA ITEM ACTION PRESENTED BY PAGE NO TIME 7 Policies for Approval Appointment of Chief 7.1 Approval 210 Consultants Policy Executive Communications Chief 7.2 Approval 223 Policy Executive Corporate Payroll Chief 6.10pm 7.3 Approval 242 Policy Executive Entitlements, Payments Director of - 7.4 Approval 254 & Benefits Policy F&CS Chief 6.40pm 7.5 Membership Policy Approval 277 Executive Recovery of Sundry Director of 7.6 Approval 294 Debts Policy F&CS Health & Safety Chief 7.7 Approval 303 Policies Executive ITEM AGENDA ITEM ACTION PRESENTED BY PAGE NO TIME Office Fire Safety Policy, ,Managing Violence & Aggression at Work Policy; Personal Relationships Chief 7.8 Approval 330 at Work Policy Executive Adverse Weather Chief 7.9 Approval 341 Policy Executive Landlord Health & Director of 7.10 Approval 350 Safety Policies
    [Show full text]
  • Facebook, Twitter, and the Uncertain Future of Present Sense Impressions
    BELLIN_FINAL.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 12/19/2011 3:29 PM University of Pennsylvania Law Review FOUNDED 1852 ________________ Formerly American Law Register ________________________ VOL. 160 JANUARY 2012 NO. 2 ARTICLE FACEBOOK, TWITTER, AND THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF PRESENT SENSE IMPRESSIONS † JEFFREY BELLIN The intricate legal framework governing the admission of out-of-court statements in American trials is premised on increasingly outdated communi- cation norms. Nowhere is this more apparent than with the hearsay exception for “present sense impressions.” Changing communication practices typified by interactions on social media websites like Facebook and Twitter herald the arrival of a previously uncontemplated—and uniquely unreliable—breed of present sense impressions. This Article contends that the indiscriminate admis- sion of these electronic present sense impressions (e-PSIs) is both normatively undesirable and inconsistent with the traditional rationale for the present sense impression exception. It proposes a reform to the exception that would exclude † Assistant Professor of Law, Southern Methodist University, Dedman School of Law. I would like to thank Edward Imwinkelried, Colin Miller, and the participants in the SMU Faculty Forum for their comments on a draft of this Article. Donna Bowman and Octavio Dominguez contributed valuable research assistance. The Article would not have been possible without the patience and support of Catherine Zoe Garrett. (331) BELLIN_FINAL.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 12/19/2011 3:29 PM 332 University of Pennsylvania Law Review [Vol. 160: 331 unreliable e-PSIs while simultaneously realigning the modern rule with its his- torical rationale. In so doing, this Article sounds an early warning to courts and legislators regarding similar challenges on the horizon, as modern commu- nication norms continue to evolve beyond the contemplation of the drafters of the hearsay rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules and Regulations Governing Public Utility Service
    RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICE ISSUED BY THE MISSISSIPPI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI COMPILED WITH AMENDMENTS March 2, 2011 1 1. GENERAL RULES RULE 1 – Applicability RULE 2 – Definitions RULE 3 - Accounts, Records and Reports RULE 4 - System Operation and Records RULE 5 - Continuity of Service RULE 6 - Customer Relations RULE 7 - Refusal to Serve Customers RULE 8 - Discontinuance of Service RULE 9 - Customer Deposits RULE 10 - Billing RULE 11 - Meters RULE 12 - New Construction RULE 13 - Joint Operation RULE 14 - Poles and Other Structures RULE 15 - Service Rules and Regulations 2. SPECIAL RULES - ELECTRICITY RULE 16 - Location of Meters RULE 17 - Meter Testing Facilities and Equipment RULE 18 - Accuracy Requirements for Service Watt-Hour Meters RULE 19 - Servicing Utilization and Control Equipment RULE 20 - Servicing Utilization and Control Equipment RULE 21 - Place and Methods for Meter Testing RULE 22 - Installation Tests RULE 23 - Periodic Tests of Watt-Hour and Demand Meters RULE 24 - Tests RULE 25 - Voltage RULE 26 - Voltage Surveys and Records RULE 27 - Station Instruments and Meters RULE 28 - Interstate Operation RULE 29 - Special Rule for Cogeneration & Small Power 3. SPECIAL RULES - TELEPHONE COMPANIES RULE 30 – Definitions RULE 31 - Grades CF Service RULE 32 - Service Areas RULE 33 - Base Rate Area Boundaries RULE 34 - Extensions of Service RULE 35 - Adequacy of Service RULE 36 - Rates and Tariff Changes RULE 37 - Traffic Rules RULE 38 - Service Interruptions 2 RULE 39 - Service Station Lines RULE 40 - Construction Standards RULE 41 - Held Applications for Service RULE 42 - Precedence of Service RULE 43 - Use of Telephone RULE 44 - Business and Residence Telephones RULE 45 – Directories RULE 46 – Grounded Circuits RULE 47 - Extended Area Service RULE 47.1 - Slamming 4.
    [Show full text]