DOCSLIB.ORG

Requirements of Railway Undertakings for The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Requirements of Railway Undertakings for The freight business ifactionisnot taken Impact and consequencesforthe rail Relevance andimportance Actions proposedbyRUs REQUIREMENTS OF RAILWAY UNDERTAKINGS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EUROPEAN RAIL FREIGHT CORRIDORS TABLE OF CONTENTS 03 Executive Summary 04-05 06-07 Transport Market Infrastructure Studies bottlenecks 08-09 10-11 Regulatory and operational Coordination of interoperability (cross border) infrastructure works 12-13 14-15 Traffic management Use of Path procedures Coordination System 18-19 20-21 Definition of the role Organisational of the C-OSS issues 22-23 24-25 Train Harmonised corridor parameters document 26-27 28 Other & Conclusion Conclusions 29 30-31 Glossary of Abbreviations Workplan & Acronyms Warning: No part of this publication may be copied, reproduced or distributed by any means whatsoever, including electronic, except for private and individual use, without the express permission of the International Union of Railways (UIC). The same applies for translation, adaptation or transformation, arrangement or reproduction by any method or procedure whatsoever. The sole exceptions - noting the author’s name and the source - are «analyses and brief quotations justified by the critical, argumentative, educational, scientific or informative nature of the publication into which they are incorporated» (Articles L 122-4 and L122-5 of the French Intellectual Property Code). Requirements of Railway Undertakings for the Implementation © International Union of Railways (UIC) of European Rail Freight Corridors Paris, January 2014 ISBN 978-2-7461-2248-2 2 - 3 Y R UMMA Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 of 22 September 2010 describes S the process for the establishment of international rail freight corridors (RFC) with a view to the development of a competitive European rail freight network. Progress has been made towards the implementation of the RFCs, with the establishment of some RFCs and related board UTIVE and advisory groups, completion of Transport Market Studies and drafting of Investment and Implementation Plans by IMs, C development of harmonised processes and computer systems for path allocation and exchange of traffic information, and the XE creation of RFC websites. Important progress has therefore E already been made, and some RFC services were launched on 10 November 2013. In order to further the progress made, the following Railway Undertakings (RU), DBSR, BLS, Trenitalia, SNCF, CFLMM, Captrain, RCA, RC Hungaria, B Logistics, SBB, CP, PKP, in cooperation with the International Union of Railways (UIC), have prepared a list of priority topics which need to be progressed. These are analysed in terms of their importance for developing rail freight traffic and implementation proposals are identified for each. A summary spreadsheet of these topics and timescale for implementation is appended. Of particular importance to the further development of the RFCs, and common to all the topics, are: The need for better cooperation Better cooperation between IMs Cross border harmonisation between the Infrastructure Managers along and across all RFCs to ensure of technical, operational and (IM) and RUs, to ensure that the in- seamless transport along the entire administrative processes, procedures depth understanding and knowledge RFC networks, with other RFCs, and and systems along and across all RFCs that the RUs have of the logistics along feeder and parallel/diversionary including diversionary routes, with a industry and end user customers is routes mechanism to ensure that best practice sufficiently taken into account and lessons learnt are exchanged on a regular basis. RUs recommend that these should be implemented through greater involvement of RUs at the Management Boards and the establishment of working groups dealing with specific topics involving RUs and IMs. The overall objective of the RFCs is to increase rail freight’s market share of European freight transport by providing a network with conditions of use to allow RUs’ freight trains to run reliably and seamlessly across borders. Failure to make progress in these topics will have an impact on rail’s costs and performance, the two most important factors on modal choice. This will result in customers returning or continuing to use other less environmentally friendly modes which offer better end to end reliability at a lower cost. Relevance and importance Each RFC Management Board is required to undertake a Transport Market Study, which analyses the demand for international traffic using the RFC, covering the different types of traffic. It should also include a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis, and plays a central role in the implementation of that RFC, in that it: Determines short and long term planning, particularly for investment and path allocation Allows bottlenecks to be identified, and the location and level of amelioration required Contributes to the Implementation Plan which defines objectives, investment and capacity Will be taken into account for the construction of the Pre-arranged Paths (PaP) and the definition of reserve capacity, and Should identify where there are suitable alternative routes to avoid “irrational” transport routes and possible bottlenecks. Requirements of Railway Undertakings for the Implementation of European Rail Freight Corridors 4 - 5 Actions proposed c. Establish working groups with RUs to discuss traffic forecasts, types by RUs of traffic, traffic flows and related IMs should issues from an early stage until final publication, to ensure that the a. Improve quality and accuracy of RUs’ in-depth understanding of their Transport Market Studies, which have customers, logistics flows and costs, is been completed for RFCs 1, 2 and incorporated. Important developments 6, and started for RFC 8. RUs have in the worldwide logistics chain, expressed concern about the validity including changes in the choice of of some of the estimated flows, which: ports by shipping companies, and the estimated cost of rail freight » Have omitted important markets and operations, have a fundamental key feeder flows, impact on future RFC corridor flows, KET STUDIES » Are double counted, with the same and must be included. flows accounted for on more than R d. Take into account the lists of short one RFC and long term bottlenecks, planned » Have not sufficiently engaged RUs investment plans, construction works, who have an in-depth knowledge and saturation periods in a 24 hour and understanding of the logistics period. T MA sector and end user customers. e. Develop a common transport R b. Take into account the opinions of modelling approach for all RFCs. existing and potential RUs and A coordinated transport modelling Authorised Applicants (AA) of that approach which is used on and RFC, in particular on: includes all RFCs will allow more accurate results to be achieved. A » Journey times classic transport nodal model, which » Punctuality allows weighting of alternative routes rather than Corridor studies, may be ANSPO » Availability of interoperable rolling required. stock TR » Simplified procedures for obtaining paths » Punctuality track record » Train cancellation history. Impact and consequences for the rail freight business if action is not taken Accurate knowledge and understanding of the network and the traffic flows is essential for short and long term planning of investment and path allocation. Based on these results and the estimated level of traffic volumes, IMs will decide on the extent of and location of bottlenecks on their networks, what investment is required, and how paths should be allocated. They have a direct impact on the Implementation and Investment Plans. Inaccurate traffic forecasts may lead to an incorrect assessment of the location of bottlenecks and levels of investment required. Relevance and importance In accordance with the Regulation, IMs must: Identify and describe bottlenecks on each RFC for the Implementation Plan, and Prepare a plan for the management of the capacity of the forecast freight trains including removal of identified bottlenecks for the Investment Plan. This information is also necessary for the preparation of reliable catalogue paths and diversionary paths. It is vital that bottlenecks are: Correctly identified and described in relation to the existing and forecast traffic flows, as they impact on the performance Made readily accessible to RUs by the IMs Regularly updated. Actions proposed by RUs IMs should: a. Use existing practices, such as the RailNetEurope (RNE) guidelines and/or Forum Train Europe (FTE) requirements to ensure that options for alternative routes are fully considered in the Implementation Plan. b. Establish dedicated working groups to examine infrastructure bottlenecks involving RUs for each RFC at an early stage to: » Develop complete and up to date lists of bottlenecks, and gain understanding of the relative level of impact of each on the end user customer » Determine, prioritise and discuss timescales for the list of bottlenecks » Coordinate work between the infrastructure bottlenecks and the impact of construction works (long and short term). Requirements of Railway Undertakings for the Implementation of European Rail Freight Corridors 6 - 7 c. For each bottleneck, identify: » Type of bottleneck, ie technical or operational. Bottlenecks can » Daily, weekly, yearly and seasonal be related to capacity, speed variations. Due to end user logistics KS restrictions, and technical constraints requirements, rail freight movements related to gauge, train length, lack C are concentrated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • INDIAN RAILWAYS SCHEDULE of DIMENSIONS 1676Mm Gauge (BG)
    INDIAN RAILWAYS SCHEDULE OF DIMENSIONS 1676mm Gauge (BG) REVISED, 2004 SCHEDULE OF DIMENSIONS-1676mm, GAUGE SHEDULE OF DIMENSIONS-1676MM GAUGE Schedule of Dimensions for Indian Railways, 1676mm Gauge Dear Sir/Dear Sirs, With their circular letter No. 735-W. of 1922, the Railway Board issued a Schedule of Maximum, Minimum and Recommended Dimensions to be observed on all 1676mm gauge Railways in India. In that Schedule, certain dimensions of the previous schedule of the year 1913 were modified with the object of permitting the use of enlarged rolling stock. 2. The Schedule of Dimensions of 1922 contained two distinct sections, namely, a schedule of "Maximum and Minimum Dimensions" which was considered to enable the proposed larger vehicles to run with about the same degree of safety as that which was previously obtained on the older Railways with existing stock, and a schedule of "Recommended Dimensions" intended to provide approximately the same clearances from fixed structures for the future larger vehicles as the 1913 schedule gave for existing vehicles. 3. In their circular letter No. 232-Tech.dated the 8th February, 1926, the Railway Board gave instructions that the Recommended Dimensions given in the 1922 Schedule were to be observed on important Railways in all new works and alterations to existing works. These orders were modified in letter No. 232-Tech. of the 26th April, 1926, which allowed a relaxation in the case of certain recommended dimensions, the adoption of which would involve heavy expenditure in remodeling works. 4. In 1929, it was found desirable further to amend the Schedule of 1922 in order to introduce certain improve- ments in the light of experience gained since it was issued, and to provide the clearances required by electric traction equipment on lines which were likely to be electrified in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Rail Corridor Adjacent Track Accident Risk Analysis
    USDOT Tier 1 University Transportation Center Final Report NURail Project ID: NURail2013-UIUC-R08 Shared Rail Corridor Adjacent Track Accident Risk Analysis By M. Rapik Saat Research Assistant Professor – Rail Transportation and Engineering Center (RailTEC) University of Illinois at Urbana – Champaign [email protected] and Chen-Yu Lin Masters Student of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana – Champaign [email protected] 1 DISCLAIMER Funding for this research was provided by the NURail Center, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign under Grant No. DTRT12-G-UTC18 of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research & Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Centers Program. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. 2 USDOT Tier 1 University Transportation Center Final Report TECHNICAL SUMMARY Title Shared Rail Corridor Adjacent Track Accident Risk Analysis Introduction Safety is a high priority for any rail system. There are several safety concerns associated with operating passenger and freight trains on shared-use rail corridors (SRC). Adjacent track accident (ATA) is one of the most important concerns. ATA mainly refers to a train accident scenario where a derailed equipment intrudes adjacent tracks, causing operation disturbance and potential subsequent train collisions on the adjacent tracks. Other ATA scenarios include collisions between trains on adjacent tracks (raking), turnouts and railroad crossings.
    [Show full text]
  • Eprints.Whiterose.Ac.Uk/2271
    This is a repository copy of New Inter-Modal Freight Technology and Cost Comparisons. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2271/ Monograph: Fowkes, A.S., Nash, C.A. and Tweddle, G. (1989) New Inter-Modal Freight Technology and Cost Comparisons. Working Paper. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds , Leeds, UK. Working Paper 285 Reuse See Attached Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ White Rose Research Online http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Institute of Transport Studies University of Leeds This is an ITS Working Paper produced and published by the University of Leeds. ITS Working Papers are intended to provide information and encourage discussion on a topic in advance of formal publication. They represent only the views of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views or approval of the sponsors. White Rose Repository URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2271/ Published paper Fowkes, A.S., Nash, C.A., Tweddle, G. (1989) New Inter-Modal Freight Technology and Cost Comparisons. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds. Working Paper 285 White Rose Consortium ePrints Repository [email protected] Working Paper 285 December 1989 NEW INTER-MODAL FREIGHT TECHNOLOGY AND COST COMPARISONS AS Fowkes CA Nash G Tweddle ITS Working Papers are intended to provide information and encourage discussion on a topic in advance of formal publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Locolines Ed 56
    DIVISIONAL EXECUTIVE DIVISIONAL SECRETARY: Marc Marotta 0414 897 314 DIVISIONAL PRESIDENT: Terry Sheedy 0417 310 400 DIVISIONAL ASSIST. SECRETARY: Jim Chrysostomou 0404 814 141 DIVISIONAL VICE PRESIDENT: John Marotta 0414 864 702 DIVISIONAL DELEGATES Metropolitan Sub-division: Kevin Duggan 0404 811 589 Paris Jolly 0422 790 624 Pacific National Sub-division: Peter Laux 0417 526 544 Pacific National (ex Freight) Sub-division: James Styles 0427 018 963 Passenger Sub-division: Wayne Hicks 0407 035 282 MARCH 2013 LOCO LINES Conten ts LLOCOOCO LLINESINES EDITION 56 Marc Marotta—Loco Div Secretary 3 MAR 2013 Terry Sheedy—Branch / Div President 6 Loco Lines is published by the Locomotive Division of the Australian Rail, Tram & Bus John Marotta— Divisional V/P 7 Industry Union – Victorian Branch. See the bottom of this page for the Locomotive Division’s business address, V/ Line Pass OHS Report 12 telephone, e-mail and website details. Nelsons Column 14 Loco Lines is distributed free to all financial members of the Locomotive Division. Retired Enginemen also receive the Letters 20 magazine for free. It is made available to non-members at a cost of $20.00 per year. Cab Committee 22 Advertisements offering a specific benefit to Locomotive Signal Sighting Committee 23 Division members are published free of charge. Heritage groups are generally not charged for advertising or tour information. Off the Rails 25 Views or opinions expressed in published contributions to Loco Scholarships 25 Lines are not necessarily those of the Union Office. We also reserve the right to alter or delete text for legal or other Talkback from Hinch 26 purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 23: Track Materials
    SECTION 23 TRACK MATERIALS 23.1 Securing Sleepers in Bundles 23.2 Loading Used sleepers 23.3 Loading New Sleepers 23.4 Concrete Sleepers 23.5 ETC wagon loading 23.6 Transportation of Welded Rails 23.1 SECURING SLEEPERS IN BUNDLES Some methods of securing sleepers in bundles have proved to be suspect. BUNDLING WOODEN SLEEPERS DO… Place into bundles of 25 maximum. Band with two metal strapping bands placed 300 mm from each end of the sleepers. DO NOT… DO NOT use a single metal band DO NOT use single or double No. 8 wire. DO NOT use plastic/nylon (blue) strapping. Single banding and No. 8 wire may allow sleepers to work loose. Plastic / nylon strapping wears against the sleepers and can break in transit. 15 November, 2017 FREIGHT HANDLING CODE Page 23.1 23.2 LOADING USED SLEEPERS TPR sleepers are more uniform in section than recovered hardwood sleepers, so different stacking methods are employed. These are shown in Diagram 23.1. DO… TPR SLEEPERS: Load in stacks of four to the wagon (US). HARDWOOD SLEEPERS: Load in stacks of three. Two bundles form the base of the stack with one bundle on top in the centre of the wagon. Refer to Diagram 18.2 Use good quality dunnage on the wagon floor and between layers. Dunnage must extend completely across the load with no short lengths. Load up to 4 stacks per wagon on wagons with 8 bond chains. Load up to 3 stacks per wagon on wagons with 6 bond chains. Ensure stanchions and headboards are in place.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary and Generalization of the Conrail Electrification Study Results for Application to Other Railroads
    / ) 6 Contract No. DOT-TSC-1686 SUMMARY AND GENERALIZATION OF THE CONRAIL ELECTRIFICATION STUDY RESULTS FOR APPLICATION TO OTHER RAILROADS Edward G. Schwarm Arthur D. Little, Inc. Acorn Park Cambridge, MA 02140 MARCH, 1980 FINAL REPORT Prepared for U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CENTER Kendall Square Cambridge, MA 02142 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. .4 . Title, and Subti tle 5. Report Date March 27, 1980 Summary and Generalization of the Conrail Electrifi­ cation Study Results for Application to Other Rail­ 6e Performing Organization Coda roads DTS-742 8. Performing Organization Report No. 7. Author'*) * Edward G. Schwarm 83054 9, Performing Orgoniration Nomo and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) R-933/RR-932 Arthur D. Little, Inc.“ Acorn Park 11. Contract or Grant No. Cambridge, MA 02140 DOT-TSC-1686 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Nome and Address Final Report, April 1979 U.S. Department of Transportation to March 1980 .Federal Railroad.Administration Office of Research and Development T4« Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D.C. 20590 RRD-22 15. Supplementary Notes * Report prepared under contract to: Transportation Systems Center, U.S. Department of Transportation, Kendall Square, Cambridge, MA 02142 16. Abstract The recent railroad electrification feasibility study of the Conrail line segment from Harrisburg to Pittsburgh is reviewed in this report. Approach to design and operational strategy are discussed. A summary of costs and units for various investment and cost items is presented, escalated into 1980 dollars. Of particular interest to the reader are the comments regarding the more general application of the methodology and cost figures to subsequent railroad electri­ fication studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Freight Study
    Wigan Rail Freight Study Final Report Prepared for: Transport for Greater Manchester & Wigan Council by MDS Transmodal Limited Date: May 2012 Ref: 211076r_ver Final CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Background 2. Freight Activity in North West and Wigan 3. Inventory of Intermodal Terminals in North West 4. Economics of Rail Freight 5. Future Prospects and Opportunities 6. Summary, Conclusions and Next Steps Appendix: Data Tables COPYRIGHT The contents of this document must not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part without the written consent of MDS Transmodal 1. INTRODUCTION Wigan Council (alongside Transport for Greater Manchester ± TfGM) commissioned MDS Transmodal in December 2011 to undertake a study into rail freight within the Wigan Council area. The main objective of the study was to identify existing use of rail freight, assess realistic future prospects and determine what kind of facilities would need to be developed. The study will inform the development of a wider transport strategy for Wigan Council. This technical report documHQWSURYLGHVDVXPPDU\RIWKHVWXG\¶VPDLQILQGLQJV,WEURDGO\ covers the following: Background information and data concerning the rail freight sector nationally; An assessment of cargo currently lifted in the North West and Wigan area; An inventory of existing non-bulk rail terminal facilities in the North West and planned terminal developments; The economics of rail freight; Realistic future prospects and opportunities for rail in the Wigan area, including the identification of large freight traffic generators in the Wigan area i.e. organisations which potentially have sufficient traffic, either individually or combined, to generate full-length rail freight services; and Overall conclusions and recommended next steps.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 04/2018
    Rail Accident Report Freight train derailment at Lewisham, south- east London 24 January 2017 Report 04/2018 February 2018 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2018 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.gov.uk/raib. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.gov.uk/raib DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Preface Preface The purpose of a Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) investigation is to improve railway safety by preventing future railway accidents or by mitigating their consequences. It is not the purpose of such an investigation to establish blame or liability. Accordingly, it is inappropriate that RAIB reports should be used to assign fault or blame, or determine liability, since neither the investigation nor the reporting process has been undertaken for that purpose. The RAIB’s findings are based on its own evaluation of the evidence that was available at the time of the investigation and are intended to explain what happened, and why, in a fair and unbiased manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Operating on the Railways
    Operating on the railways To the reader This brochure provides a brief description of the Network Statement issued by the Swedish Transport Administration (Trafikverket). The information relates primarily to our services, how to gain access to them and how to proceed (from there). A new Network Statement will be valid every year at midnight on the second Saturday of December. Certain text may be changed in line with the update each year and the amendments we issue. The Network Statement that is published on the website of the Swedish Transport Administration takes precedence over this brochure. For more information in English, please visit our website: Network Statement. You will find forms and instructions for application only in Swedish; do not hesitate to contact us if you need any help. On our website you will also find the correct charge of each service in this brochure. Contact If you have any views on this brochure, or on the Network Statement itself, please do not hesitate to contact us by e-mail at: [email protected] If you have any queries regarding our services, or about operating on the railways, please contact our customer services via e-mail: [email protected] 2 The Network Statement – NS The railways form an important part of Sweden’s infrastructure. In order to function effectively, the railways have to be developed based on the needs that arise. The Swedish Transport Administration discusses this with the transport sector and public authorities in order to create transport systems that are beneficial to society. Our operations are directed by a number of ordinances and acts.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Rail Transport Operations and Units
    FM 55-20 FIELD MANUAL m s ^ ; )cJ' M. il ARMY RAIL TRANSPORT OPERATIONS AND UNITS RETURN TO ARMY LIBRARY ROOM 1 A 518 PENTAGON HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE A\R M Y JUNE 1974 1 r il *FM 55-20 FIELD MâNUAL HEADQUARTERS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. 55-20 ! WASHINGTON, D. C., H June 197b ARMY RAIL TRANSPORT OPERATIONS AND UNITS Paragraph Page CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1—1-7 1-1 2. TRANSPORTATION RAILWAY UNITS Section I. General 2-1—2-3 2-1 II. Supervisory and Command Units 2-4—2-6 2-2 III. Maintenance and Operating Units 2-7—2-11 2-9 IV. Transportation Railway Service Teads 2-12, 2-13 2-18 t* A CHAPTER 3. RAILWAY OPERATIONS - 3-1—3-14 3-1 4. OPERATIONAL CONSIDERATIONS IN A THEATER OF OPERATIONS 4-1—4-6 4-1 f » A 5. RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER AGENCIES . 5-1—5-5 5-1 6. RAILWAY MAINTENANCE AND SUPPLY _. 6-1—6-4 6-1 7. RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION 7-1—7-11 7-1 8. RAILWAY ENGINEERING DATA 8-1—8-4 8-1 9. RAILWAY COMMUNICATIONS DATA 9-1—9-5 9-1 10. RAILWAY AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM ; 10-1, 10-2 10-1 11. RAILWAY SECURITY 11-1—11-7 11-7 12. PLANNING Section I. General - 12-1, 12-2 12-1 II. Railway Line Capacity Planning 12-3—12-15 12-1 III. Railway Yard Capacity Determination 12-16—12-19 12-4 IV. Railway Equipment Requirements 12-20—12-23 12-6 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Tramway Track Standard
    SYDNEY TRAMWAY MUSEUM TRAMWAY TRACK STANDARD MARCH 2016NOVEMBER 2019 SYDNEY TRAMWAY MUSEUM Document Control Record 1. Document Details: Name: Tramway track Standard Number STM6024 Version Number: 1.89 Document Status: Working Draft X Approved for Issue Archived Next Scheduled Review Date: 2. Version History: Version Number Date Reason/Comments 1.0 20/01/2007 Initial issue 1.1 09/01/2009 Changed Report title 1.2 09/07/2009 Added Tie Bar drawing 1.3 31/05/2010 Changes made to satisfy the 2009 ITSRR audit. 1.4 31/07/2010 Changes made to satisfy the 2009 ITSR audit. 1.5 03/09/2010 Updated Appendix D and other minor changes. 1.6 15/05/2011 Added the Pandrol Information as the RNP uses this equipment 1.7 21/8/2015 Added Loading gauge drawing and reference to STM6072 1.8 31/03/2016 Amended Distribution List format Better defining the sleeper standard (Good, Fair, Poor) by photos 1.9 21/11/2019 and description in Section 10.11. Approved by Signature & Date 3. Distribution List Position Date Location of Documents Rail Safety Manager Original held on GOOGLE secure Website STM WEB SITE Updated regularly and put onto the STM Web site. STM Office STM Office Computer STM Office STM Office cupboard STM6024 Tramway track Standard Page 2 of 55 Version 1.9 – 21/11/2019 SYDNEY TRAMWAY MUSEUM 1. Purpose To explain the various tramway track standards at the Sydney tramway Museum. Also the purpose of this document is to set down, in printed form, a history of the construction, operation and maintenance of the STM for the benefit of future generations called upon to further the aims of the society.
    [Show full text]
  • Upgrading Narrow Gauge Standards
    JAPANESE RAILWAY HISTORY 6 Upgrading Narrow Gauge Standards Shinichi Kato When the railways were nationalized Unification of standards and gauges persistently advocated by many in the between 1906 and 1907, the skeleton of was accomplished by incorporating the railway industry, and the debate spurred the nationwide trunk rail network was latest technologies. The process was con- extensive research reconfirming the dis- nearly completed, as mandated in the current with the industrial revolution in advantages of narrow gauge. In other Railway Construction Act of 1892. At the Japan, which occurred between the 1890s words, the railway authority tried to en- end of 1907, nationalized railway lines in and the 1900s, followed by the burgeoning sure the upgrading of railroad facilities by operation totalled 7,165 km. Construction of the heavy and chemical industries in adopting technical standards equivalent continued and 2,677 km of line were the 1910s. Rapid development of railway to those for standard gauge as far as pos- added by the end of 1919. In addition to technology formed an integral part of the sible within the restraints of the narrow active line expansion, the first decade af- industrialization process and boosted gauge. ter the nationalization up to the 1910s transport capacity significantly. Govern- Construction gauge, loading gauge, dis- was characterized by vigorous efforts to ment railways, a gigantic industrial cus- tance between track centres, bridge speci- improve the quality of facilities. tomer, also had an engineering arm cover- fications, and other standards were estab- The nationalization of railways was ac- ing basic research and manufacturing, lished on the basis of standard gauge.
    [Show full text]