Locolines Ed 56
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
INDIAN RAILWAYS SCHEDULE of DIMENSIONS 1676Mm Gauge (BG)
INDIAN RAILWAYS SCHEDULE OF DIMENSIONS 1676mm Gauge (BG) REVISED, 2004 SCHEDULE OF DIMENSIONS-1676mm, GAUGE SHEDULE OF DIMENSIONS-1676MM GAUGE Schedule of Dimensions for Indian Railways, 1676mm Gauge Dear Sir/Dear Sirs, With their circular letter No. 735-W. of 1922, the Railway Board issued a Schedule of Maximum, Minimum and Recommended Dimensions to be observed on all 1676mm gauge Railways in India. In that Schedule, certain dimensions of the previous schedule of the year 1913 were modified with the object of permitting the use of enlarged rolling stock. 2. The Schedule of Dimensions of 1922 contained two distinct sections, namely, a schedule of "Maximum and Minimum Dimensions" which was considered to enable the proposed larger vehicles to run with about the same degree of safety as that which was previously obtained on the older Railways with existing stock, and a schedule of "Recommended Dimensions" intended to provide approximately the same clearances from fixed structures for the future larger vehicles as the 1913 schedule gave for existing vehicles. 3. In their circular letter No. 232-Tech.dated the 8th February, 1926, the Railway Board gave instructions that the Recommended Dimensions given in the 1922 Schedule were to be observed on important Railways in all new works and alterations to existing works. These orders were modified in letter No. 232-Tech. of the 26th April, 1926, which allowed a relaxation in the case of certain recommended dimensions, the adoption of which would involve heavy expenditure in remodeling works. 4. In 1929, it was found desirable further to amend the Schedule of 1922 in order to introduce certain improve- ments in the light of experience gained since it was issued, and to provide the clearances required by electric traction equipment on lines which were likely to be electrified in the future. -
Shared Rail Corridor Adjacent Track Accident Risk Analysis
USDOT Tier 1 University Transportation Center Final Report NURail Project ID: NURail2013-UIUC-R08 Shared Rail Corridor Adjacent Track Accident Risk Analysis By M. Rapik Saat Research Assistant Professor – Rail Transportation and Engineering Center (RailTEC) University of Illinois at Urbana – Champaign [email protected] and Chen-Yu Lin Masters Student of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana – Champaign [email protected] 1 DISCLAIMER Funding for this research was provided by the NURail Center, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign under Grant No. DTRT12-G-UTC18 of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research & Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Centers Program. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. 2 USDOT Tier 1 University Transportation Center Final Report TECHNICAL SUMMARY Title Shared Rail Corridor Adjacent Track Accident Risk Analysis Introduction Safety is a high priority for any rail system. There are several safety concerns associated with operating passenger and freight trains on shared-use rail corridors (SRC). Adjacent track accident (ATA) is one of the most important concerns. ATA mainly refers to a train accident scenario where a derailed equipment intrudes adjacent tracks, causing operation disturbance and potential subsequent train collisions on the adjacent tracks. Other ATA scenarios include collisions between trains on adjacent tracks (raking), turnouts and railroad crossings. -
Community Accessability Inc. Annual Report 2014 – 2015
Community Accessability Inc. Annual Report 2014 – 2015 Enabling Independence 1 2 Community Accessability Inc. We were founded in 1998 to support the growing need of transport disadvantaged community memebers throughout the Hume region. We have 20 employees and utilise the conttributions of more than 220 volunteers to deliver our programs and services. Our offices are located in Wodonga, Shepparton, Wangaratta and Seymour. We deliver a range of funded and un-funded services and programs via our 2 services arms: 1. Assisted Transport Programs: a. Community Transport*: providing transport for clients to medical and social outings, utilizing volunteer drivers and a fleet of vehicles. b. The Getting There Network: acts as a portal for all transport information, services, training and assistance programs and provides access to transport assets located in the region. c. The Access Spot**: provides support, assistance and transport and access information from a manned location in Wangaratta and static deplays in the King Valley. 2. Volunteer Friends Program***: a. a disability respite program offering opportunities for 16+ year olds to enjoy community access through social gatherings, holidays and outings. * Funding is provided by the Home and Community Care program via the Department of Health ** Support is provided from the Rural City of Wangaratta *** Funding is provided by the Department of Human Services Our Vision Excellence in the delivery of accessible support services within the community. Mission Community Accessability Inc. works in partnership with clients, carers and other professionals, providing high quality and flexible services. Through leadership and a dedicated team of staff and volunteers, we promote social wellbeing and independence. -
Agenda of Ordinary Council Meeting
ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 28 JUNE 2021 10.2 ARTC - SPECIFIC CONTROLS OVERLAY RESPONSE TO PROPOSED INCORPORATED DOCUMENT Author: James Kirby - Senior Strategic Planner File No: PLP/13/094 Attachments: 1. Strategic Planning Collated response - PSA Voluntary Notification 17 May 2021 1. Purpose 1.1 For Council to consider and endorse the attached submission (Attachment 1) to Planning Scheme Amendment GC157 which implements the Specific Controls Overlay to facilitate construction of the Federal Government’s Inland Rail project. 2. Background 2.1 The Incorporated Document will be incorporated into the Whittlesea, Mitchell, Strathbogie, Benalla, Wangaratta and Wodonga Planning Schemes (the Planning Schemes) and is made pursuant to section 6(2)(j) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. 2.2 The Project will utilise the existing corridor and modify or replace existing infrastructure at a number of locations where there is not adequate clearance for double-stacked freight trains. The main components of the Project include 12 discrete project areas (also referred to as ‘enhancement sites’) from Beveridge to Albury where road and rail interfaces do not provide the required horizontal and vertical clearance for double-stacked freight trains. 2.3 The proposed amendment seeks to introduce an Incorporated Document (with conditions) for a Specific Controls Overlay (SCO) which will avoid the need for future planning permits for works associated with the Inland Rail Project. The scope of the project itself is generally limited to the following seven sites within the shire: Broadford-Wandong Road bridge, Wandong Hamilton Street bridge, Broadford Short Street bridge, Broadford Marchbanks Road bridge, Broadford Hume Highway bridge, Tallarook Seymour-Avenel Road bridge, Seymour Hume Highway bridge, Seymour MITCHELL SHIRE COUNCIL Page 436 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 28 JUNE 2021 ARTC - SPECIFIC CONTROLS OVERLAY RESPONSE TO PROPOSED INCORPORATED DOCUMENT (CONT.) 3. -
1 Submission to the Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade
Submission to the Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee into the impact of Defence training activities and facilities on rural and regional communities by John Cox Summary Increased security at Defence bases is negatively impacting the relationship between local communities and Defence organisations. The reduced access to bases has economic and social impacts for both the community and Defence. A solution is to locate select facilities that require lesser levels of security outside the high security perimeters of bases. Examples are Navy, Army and Airforce Museums. While the museums are used principally in the training of ADF members, museums also serve a valuable purpose in linking communities to the Defence Force. Regional military units need strong links with regional communities; they are neighbours and cooperative arrangements help both parties. It is common for members of local communities to become volunteers as guides and researchers at Defence museums. Social and economic bonds are strengthened through museums attracting visitors from distances away from a rural and regional community. Increased visitation helps local economies. And it helps Defence in connecting to Australians, particularly in support of recruitment. The proposed Armour and Artillery Museum at Puckapunyal/Seymour in Victoria is only one and a half hours drive from Melbourne’s northern and inner suburbs. A day trip from a major population centre is highly marketable and increases visits. The museum project is worth over $20 million. Such investment should be shared with the broader community where possible. Social bonds extend to training at Defence museum facilities for school and tertiary students undertaking related studies. -
Eprints.Whiterose.Ac.Uk/2271
This is a repository copy of New Inter-Modal Freight Technology and Cost Comparisons. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2271/ Monograph: Fowkes, A.S., Nash, C.A. and Tweddle, G. (1989) New Inter-Modal Freight Technology and Cost Comparisons. Working Paper. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds , Leeds, UK. Working Paper 285 Reuse See Attached Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ White Rose Research Online http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Institute of Transport Studies University of Leeds This is an ITS Working Paper produced and published by the University of Leeds. ITS Working Papers are intended to provide information and encourage discussion on a topic in advance of formal publication. They represent only the views of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views or approval of the sponsors. White Rose Repository URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2271/ Published paper Fowkes, A.S., Nash, C.A., Tweddle, G. (1989) New Inter-Modal Freight Technology and Cost Comparisons. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds. Working Paper 285 White Rose Consortium ePrints Repository [email protected] Working Paper 285 December 1989 NEW INTER-MODAL FREIGHT TECHNOLOGY AND COST COMPARISONS AS Fowkes CA Nash G Tweddle ITS Working Papers are intended to provide information and encourage discussion on a topic in advance of formal publication. -
Section 23: Track Materials
SECTION 23 TRACK MATERIALS 23.1 Securing Sleepers in Bundles 23.2 Loading Used sleepers 23.3 Loading New Sleepers 23.4 Concrete Sleepers 23.5 ETC wagon loading 23.6 Transportation of Welded Rails 23.1 SECURING SLEEPERS IN BUNDLES Some methods of securing sleepers in bundles have proved to be suspect. BUNDLING WOODEN SLEEPERS DO… Place into bundles of 25 maximum. Band with two metal strapping bands placed 300 mm from each end of the sleepers. DO NOT… DO NOT use a single metal band DO NOT use single or double No. 8 wire. DO NOT use plastic/nylon (blue) strapping. Single banding and No. 8 wire may allow sleepers to work loose. Plastic / nylon strapping wears against the sleepers and can break in transit. 15 November, 2017 FREIGHT HANDLING CODE Page 23.1 23.2 LOADING USED SLEEPERS TPR sleepers are more uniform in section than recovered hardwood sleepers, so different stacking methods are employed. These are shown in Diagram 23.1. DO… TPR SLEEPERS: Load in stacks of four to the wagon (US). HARDWOOD SLEEPERS: Load in stacks of three. Two bundles form the base of the stack with one bundle on top in the centre of the wagon. Refer to Diagram 18.2 Use good quality dunnage on the wagon floor and between layers. Dunnage must extend completely across the load with no short lengths. Load up to 4 stacks per wagon on wagons with 8 bond chains. Load up to 3 stacks per wagon on wagons with 6 bond chains. Ensure stanchions and headboards are in place. -
Summary and Generalization of the Conrail Electrification Study Results for Application to Other Railroads
/ ) 6 Contract No. DOT-TSC-1686 SUMMARY AND GENERALIZATION OF THE CONRAIL ELECTRIFICATION STUDY RESULTS FOR APPLICATION TO OTHER RAILROADS Edward G. Schwarm Arthur D. Little, Inc. Acorn Park Cambridge, MA 02140 MARCH, 1980 FINAL REPORT Prepared for U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CENTER Kendall Square Cambridge, MA 02142 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. .4 . Title, and Subti tle 5. Report Date March 27, 1980 Summary and Generalization of the Conrail Electrifi cation Study Results for Application to Other Rail 6e Performing Organization Coda roads DTS-742 8. Performing Organization Report No. 7. Author'*) * Edward G. Schwarm 83054 9, Performing Orgoniration Nomo and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) R-933/RR-932 Arthur D. Little, Inc.“ Acorn Park 11. Contract or Grant No. Cambridge, MA 02140 DOT-TSC-1686 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Nome and Address Final Report, April 1979 U.S. Department of Transportation to March 1980 .Federal Railroad.Administration Office of Research and Development T4« Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D.C. 20590 RRD-22 15. Supplementary Notes * Report prepared under contract to: Transportation Systems Center, U.S. Department of Transportation, Kendall Square, Cambridge, MA 02142 16. Abstract The recent railroad electrification feasibility study of the Conrail line segment from Harrisburg to Pittsburgh is reviewed in this report. Approach to design and operational strategy are discussed. A summary of costs and units for various investment and cost items is presented, escalated into 1980 dollars. Of particular interest to the reader are the comments regarding the more general application of the methodology and cost figures to subsequent railroad electri fication studies. -
Rail Freight Study
Wigan Rail Freight Study Final Report Prepared for: Transport for Greater Manchester & Wigan Council by MDS Transmodal Limited Date: May 2012 Ref: 211076r_ver Final CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Background 2. Freight Activity in North West and Wigan 3. Inventory of Intermodal Terminals in North West 4. Economics of Rail Freight 5. Future Prospects and Opportunities 6. Summary, Conclusions and Next Steps Appendix: Data Tables COPYRIGHT The contents of this document must not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part without the written consent of MDS Transmodal 1. INTRODUCTION Wigan Council (alongside Transport for Greater Manchester ± TfGM) commissioned MDS Transmodal in December 2011 to undertake a study into rail freight within the Wigan Council area. The main objective of the study was to identify existing use of rail freight, assess realistic future prospects and determine what kind of facilities would need to be developed. The study will inform the development of a wider transport strategy for Wigan Council. This technical report documHQWSURYLGHVDVXPPDU\RIWKHVWXG\¶VPDLQILQGLQJV,WEURDGO\ covers the following: Background information and data concerning the rail freight sector nationally; An assessment of cargo currently lifted in the North West and Wigan area; An inventory of existing non-bulk rail terminal facilities in the North West and planned terminal developments; The economics of rail freight; Realistic future prospects and opportunities for rail in the Wigan area, including the identification of large freight traffic generators in the Wigan area i.e. organisations which potentially have sufficient traffic, either individually or combined, to generate full-length rail freight services; and Overall conclusions and recommended next steps. -
TTGGMC Newsletter
Tea Tree Gully Gem & Mineral Club Inc. (TTGGMC) April Clubrooms: Old Tea Tree Gully School, Dowding Terrace, Tea Tree Gully, SA 5091. Edition Postal Address: Po Box 40, St Agnes, SA 5097. President: Ian Everard. H: 8251 1830 M: 0417 859 443 Email: [email protected] 2016 Secretary: Claudia Gill. M: 0419 841 473 Email: [email protected] Treasurer: Russell Fischer. Email: [email protected] "Rockzette" Tea Tree Gully Gem & Mineral Club News In This Edition… President’s Report Meetings, Courses & Fees. Hi All, Diary Dates Meetings Don McColl is doing a presentation on, st Stop Press Club meetings are held on the 1 Thursday of Harts Range, N.T.; hope you all can make President's Report. each month except January: Club Activities. it. Apologies from Janet, Mel and myself Committee meetings start at 7.00 pm. General Meetings, Courses & Fees. for the April meeting as we will be on our meetings - arrive at 7.30 pm for 8.00 pm start. Member’s Mineral Purchases. way to the Canberra ‘Rockswap’. ‘Shell Grotto’ Article. Cheers, Ian. Faceting (times to be advised) General Interest - Workshops. Course 10 weeks x 2 hours Cost $20.00. General Interest – ‘Flying Scotsman’, Handy Club Activities Use of equipment $1.00 per hour. Hints, and Nancy’s Travel Poem. Lapidary (Tuesday mornings) Members Notice Board Competitions Course 5 weeks x 2 hours Cost $10.00. Competitions have been suspended indefinitely and are currently replaced Use of equipment $1.00 per hour. Diary Dates with members showcasing an interesting Silver Craft (Friday mornings) part of their collection. -
Public Transport
MITCHELL SHIRE COUNCIL. PUBLIC TRANSPORT. Improving Public Transport in Mitchell Shire Preliminary Business Case May 2018 Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 3 1 Part 1 Problem ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Definition of the Problem......................................................................................... 12 1.3 Evidence of the Problem ......................................................................................... 12 1.4 Timing Considerations ............................................................................................ 20 1.5 Consideration of the Broader Context ..................................................................... 20 2 Part 2 Benefits ..................................................................................................................... 21 2.1 Benefits to be Delivered .......................................................................................... 21 2.2 Importance of the Benefits to Government .............................................................. 21 2.3 Evidence of Benefit Delivery ................................................................................... 22 2.4 Interdependencies ................................................................................................. -
Report 04/2018
Rail Accident Report Freight train derailment at Lewisham, south- east London 24 January 2017 Report 04/2018 February 2018 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2018 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.gov.uk/raib. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.gov.uk/raib DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Preface Preface The purpose of a Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) investigation is to improve railway safety by preventing future railway accidents or by mitigating their consequences. It is not the purpose of such an investigation to establish blame or liability. Accordingly, it is inappropriate that RAIB reports should be used to assign fault or blame, or determine liability, since neither the investigation nor the reporting process has been undertaken for that purpose. The RAIB’s findings are based on its own evaluation of the evidence that was available at the time of the investigation and are intended to explain what happened, and why, in a fair and unbiased manner.