Locolines Ed 56

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Locolines Ed 56 DIVISIONAL EXECUTIVE DIVISIONAL SECRETARY: Marc Marotta 0414 897 314 DIVISIONAL PRESIDENT: Terry Sheedy 0417 310 400 DIVISIONAL ASSIST. SECRETARY: Jim Chrysostomou 0404 814 141 DIVISIONAL VICE PRESIDENT: John Marotta 0414 864 702 DIVISIONAL DELEGATES Metropolitan Sub-division: Kevin Duggan 0404 811 589 Paris Jolly 0422 790 624 Pacific National Sub-division: Peter Laux 0417 526 544 Pacific National (ex Freight) Sub-division: James Styles 0427 018 963 Passenger Sub-division: Wayne Hicks 0407 035 282 MARCH 2013 LOCO LINES Conten ts LLOCOOCO LLINESINES EDITION 56 Marc Marotta—Loco Div Secretary 3 MAR 2013 Terry Sheedy—Branch / Div President 6 Loco Lines is published by the Locomotive Division of the Australian Rail, Tram & Bus John Marotta— Divisional V/P 7 Industry Union – Victorian Branch. See the bottom of this page for the Locomotive Division’s business address, V/ Line Pass OHS Report 12 telephone, e-mail and website details. Nelsons Column 14 Loco Lines is distributed free to all financial members of the Locomotive Division. Retired Enginemen also receive the Letters 20 magazine for free. It is made available to non-members at a cost of $20.00 per year. Cab Committee 22 Advertisements offering a specific benefit to Locomotive Signal Sighting Committee 23 Division members are published free of charge. Heritage groups are generally not charged for advertising or tour information. Off the Rails 25 Views or opinions expressed in published contributions to Loco Scholarships 25 Lines are not necessarily those of the Union Office. We also reserve the right to alter or delete text for legal or other Talkback from Hinch 26 purposes. Contributions are printed at the discretion of the publisher. Where Is It …? 28 Loco Lines, or any part thereof, cannot be reproduced or distributed without the written Membership application 36 consent of the Victorian Locomotive Division. RT&BU-LD Address: Level 6, 1 Elizabeth St, Publisher Melbourne Victoria 3000 Marc Marotta Toll Free: 1800 134 095 Fax: 9682 3344 E-mail: [email protected] RTBU LOCOMOTIVE DIVISION WEBSITE www.rtbuvicloco.com.au MARCH 2013 LOCO LINES 2 Locomotive stationary. There is a provision to move off a crossing or bridge to make the site safe. The driver is to be relieved and be subject Divisional to breath test which is mandatory for any safety irregularity. No one can take responsibility for the driver continuing on their journey after a S.P.A.D. occurs and drivers should be aware that Secretary Dwarfs, Auto and Home signals all carry the same severity if passed at Stop. March Marotta Should a S.P.A.D occur you are to carry the appropriate regulation, failure to do so can mean you could face grave repercussions. Some emerging trends that have become evident, S.P.A.Ds that defy what would be an understandable assumption, is that Signal Passed at Danger more S.P.A.Ds occur in winter because the track is wet and greasy. In fact the highest frequency of S.P.A.Ds occurs in the summer months and during school holidays. One possible One of the most fundamental influences on a train driver’s explanation is that drivers find it hard to sleep in these months working life are signals or in railway slang ‘a stick’. In years gone and children are on school holidays which may make it difficult bye it was rare to hear of a driver passing a signal at red and to sleep during the day and the driver’s concentration suffers which could be a costly experience. The unfortunate driver when at work. involved would be stood down and if the driver was proven to be at fault they would have been reduced in classification to The statistics gathered so far show that there is a 32% increase in either working in the work shops or to a shunt engine driver S.P.A.Ds during summer when compared with the winter which represented a significant reduction in wages for 6 to 12 months. months. The fact that this was news on the railway grape vine in times gone bye attests to the rarity of the event or perhaps the Another very interesting statistic was the highest incident of reporting regime that existed at the time. S.P.A.Ds occurs on Mondays and Tuesdays irrespective of the season. No credible theory as to why. Today a number of enterprises in the Victorian rail industry have adopted management procedures that go by various names, but A disturbing trend has been observed is the increase in S.P.A.Ds in affect they are Point Demerit Systems, a management tool that occur on platforms where a driver is waiting to depart and which attempts to assess the circumstances of the S.P.A.D then they depart against a red signal at the end of a platform. This is codify that into a penalty regime that may range from points lost not new in one sense. At the Sparks when there were guards on against your driving record or to summary dismissal in worst the suburban network, quite often the guard would signal two case scenarios. A lot depends on what actions are taken before bells to depart and the signal was against you. So as a driver you and after the S.P.A.D. event. soon disciplined yourself to pay attention to the signal and everything else comes after. There is a lesson in this for today. Any driver can misjudge a stop with a goods train, passenger train or electric suburban train. The contributing factors could Antidotal information from drivers at Metro is that they were include a wet and greasy rail or foreign matter on the rail. pressured to depart by platform announcements, people with S.P.A.Ds have been known to be caused by thousands of paddles, all manner of folk on platforms trying to hurry a driver millipedes on the rail that made the track slippery. It may be up. Evidence of this is Metro’s timetabling which make no time human error, mechanical failure, or maybe an individual affected provision for passengers to alight or board a train at Flinders St by prescription medication or worse. The worse scenario is that arrive and depart at the same time. Some Metro drivers a driver testing positive for illicit drugs or alcohol in their have confirmed they try and makeup time and depart before system which would lead to instant dismissal. timetabled departure time. The message for Driver’s in this situation is, you only depart when it is safe to do so, and never S.P.A.Ds have been increasing in the frequency in recent times. I ahead of time. Don’t hurry your routine irrespective of believe that part of the increase is due to the fact that nearly all distractions. There was an old saying that the most reliable safe the suburban system is recorded and Metrol has an alarm system working system in the rail ways is a cautious train driver. Don’t to alert them when a signal is passed at a stop. There has been a speed or cut corners to try and make up time. number of incidents involving drivers at V/Line and Metro where drivers have been encouraged to continue on their journey At the Met a staggering 37% of S.P.A.Ds are at platforms and these drivers make the mistaken assumption there were departing against the signal. It’s your job as Train Drivers to technical problems with the signal or that the S.P.A.D has been operate safely. Some organizations take this matter seriously and covered up which was perhaps the case in a bye gone era. not just pay lip service and attempt to be proactive. V/Line has produced a C.D. which emphasizes some simple work practices How wrong they are when the train has cleared the Metro area in an effort to reduce the frequency of S.P.A.Ds. Other or in some cases completed the journey to Flinders Street, the organizations have adopted different strategies to make their drivers have been stood aside pending investigation. The claim driver aware of pit falls on rushing or trying to make up time. No for not following their own procedure from Metro management driver comes to work to have a S.P.A.D and much of the train was they were not sure if the S.P.A.D. had occurred but Metro drivers performance is directly related to their mind set, don’t be becomes very sure about the incident when it’s convenient for influences by external distractions. Don’t worry about timetables them. to the detriment of the safe operating technics and remember caution is the most important attribute for a train driver. Members are referred to Safety Bulletin issued by Metro Safe No SWS-BUL 02 2012. After a S.P.A.D the train is to remain MARCH 2013 LOCO LINES 3 Modern Era Unionism - Fair Work Australia listing for hearing 21/1/13, Maurice Blackburn advice sought. The matter was resolved prior to the hearing. Mildura depot still open The Victorian Locomotive Division commenced a legal fund and member jobs have been saved. in 2011 to deal with the ever increasing trend of the Victorian • Locomotive Division v Metro Trains. Rail enterprises using specialized right wing labour law firms against the Union and its members. - Maurice Blackburn acted for the Division in the Federal Court application for Breach of Contract of The Locomotive Division has witnessed some of these our members at Metro in regards to the roster code foreign owned companies that are franchise holders of Public for drivers.
Recommended publications
  • INDIAN RAILWAYS SCHEDULE of DIMENSIONS 1676Mm Gauge (BG)
    INDIAN RAILWAYS SCHEDULE OF DIMENSIONS 1676mm Gauge (BG) REVISED, 2004 SCHEDULE OF DIMENSIONS-1676mm, GAUGE SHEDULE OF DIMENSIONS-1676MM GAUGE Schedule of Dimensions for Indian Railways, 1676mm Gauge Dear Sir/Dear Sirs, With their circular letter No. 735-W. of 1922, the Railway Board issued a Schedule of Maximum, Minimum and Recommended Dimensions to be observed on all 1676mm gauge Railways in India. In that Schedule, certain dimensions of the previous schedule of the year 1913 were modified with the object of permitting the use of enlarged rolling stock. 2. The Schedule of Dimensions of 1922 contained two distinct sections, namely, a schedule of "Maximum and Minimum Dimensions" which was considered to enable the proposed larger vehicles to run with about the same degree of safety as that which was previously obtained on the older Railways with existing stock, and a schedule of "Recommended Dimensions" intended to provide approximately the same clearances from fixed structures for the future larger vehicles as the 1913 schedule gave for existing vehicles. 3. In their circular letter No. 232-Tech.dated the 8th February, 1926, the Railway Board gave instructions that the Recommended Dimensions given in the 1922 Schedule were to be observed on important Railways in all new works and alterations to existing works. These orders were modified in letter No. 232-Tech. of the 26th April, 1926, which allowed a relaxation in the case of certain recommended dimensions, the adoption of which would involve heavy expenditure in remodeling works. 4. In 1929, it was found desirable further to amend the Schedule of 1922 in order to introduce certain improve- ments in the light of experience gained since it was issued, and to provide the clearances required by electric traction equipment on lines which were likely to be electrified in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Rail Corridor Adjacent Track Accident Risk Analysis
    USDOT Tier 1 University Transportation Center Final Report NURail Project ID: NURail2013-UIUC-R08 Shared Rail Corridor Adjacent Track Accident Risk Analysis By M. Rapik Saat Research Assistant Professor – Rail Transportation and Engineering Center (RailTEC) University of Illinois at Urbana – Champaign [email protected] and Chen-Yu Lin Masters Student of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana – Champaign [email protected] 1 DISCLAIMER Funding for this research was provided by the NURail Center, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign under Grant No. DTRT12-G-UTC18 of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research & Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Centers Program. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation’s University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. 2 USDOT Tier 1 University Transportation Center Final Report TECHNICAL SUMMARY Title Shared Rail Corridor Adjacent Track Accident Risk Analysis Introduction Safety is a high priority for any rail system. There are several safety concerns associated with operating passenger and freight trains on shared-use rail corridors (SRC). Adjacent track accident (ATA) is one of the most important concerns. ATA mainly refers to a train accident scenario where a derailed equipment intrudes adjacent tracks, causing operation disturbance and potential subsequent train collisions on the adjacent tracks. Other ATA scenarios include collisions between trains on adjacent tracks (raking), turnouts and railroad crossings.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Accessability Inc. Annual Report 2014 – 2015
    Community Accessability Inc. Annual Report 2014 – 2015 Enabling Independence 1 2 Community Accessability Inc. We were founded in 1998 to support the growing need of transport disadvantaged community memebers throughout the Hume region. We have 20 employees and utilise the conttributions of more than 220 volunteers to deliver our programs and services. Our offices are located in Wodonga, Shepparton, Wangaratta and Seymour. We deliver a range of funded and un-funded services and programs via our 2 services arms: 1. Assisted Transport Programs: a. Community Transport*: providing transport for clients to medical and social outings, utilizing volunteer drivers and a fleet of vehicles. b. The Getting There Network: acts as a portal for all transport information, services, training and assistance programs and provides access to transport assets located in the region. c. The Access Spot**: provides support, assistance and transport and access information from a manned location in Wangaratta and static deplays in the King Valley. 2. Volunteer Friends Program***: a. a disability respite program offering opportunities for 16+ year olds to enjoy community access through social gatherings, holidays and outings. * Funding is provided by the Home and Community Care program via the Department of Health ** Support is provided from the Rural City of Wangaratta *** Funding is provided by the Department of Human Services Our Vision Excellence in the delivery of accessible support services within the community. Mission Community Accessability Inc. works in partnership with clients, carers and other professionals, providing high quality and flexible services. Through leadership and a dedicated team of staff and volunteers, we promote social wellbeing and independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda of Ordinary Council Meeting
    ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 28 JUNE 2021 10.2 ARTC - SPECIFIC CONTROLS OVERLAY RESPONSE TO PROPOSED INCORPORATED DOCUMENT Author: James Kirby - Senior Strategic Planner File No: PLP/13/094 Attachments: 1. Strategic Planning Collated response - PSA Voluntary Notification 17 May 2021 1. Purpose 1.1 For Council to consider and endorse the attached submission (Attachment 1) to Planning Scheme Amendment GC157 which implements the Specific Controls Overlay to facilitate construction of the Federal Government’s Inland Rail project. 2. Background 2.1 The Incorporated Document will be incorporated into the Whittlesea, Mitchell, Strathbogie, Benalla, Wangaratta and Wodonga Planning Schemes (the Planning Schemes) and is made pursuant to section 6(2)(j) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. 2.2 The Project will utilise the existing corridor and modify or replace existing infrastructure at a number of locations where there is not adequate clearance for double-stacked freight trains. The main components of the Project include 12 discrete project areas (also referred to as ‘enhancement sites’) from Beveridge to Albury where road and rail interfaces do not provide the required horizontal and vertical clearance for double-stacked freight trains. 2.3 The proposed amendment seeks to introduce an Incorporated Document (with conditions) for a Specific Controls Overlay (SCO) which will avoid the need for future planning permits for works associated with the Inland Rail Project. The scope of the project itself is generally limited to the following seven sites within the shire: Broadford-Wandong Road bridge, Wandong Hamilton Street bridge, Broadford Short Street bridge, Broadford Marchbanks Road bridge, Broadford Hume Highway bridge, Tallarook Seymour-Avenel Road bridge, Seymour Hume Highway bridge, Seymour MITCHELL SHIRE COUNCIL Page 436 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA 28 JUNE 2021 ARTC - SPECIFIC CONTROLS OVERLAY RESPONSE TO PROPOSED INCORPORATED DOCUMENT (CONT.) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Submission to the Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade
    Submission to the Senate Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee into the impact of Defence training activities and facilities on rural and regional communities by John Cox Summary Increased security at Defence bases is negatively impacting the relationship between local communities and Defence organisations. The reduced access to bases has economic and social impacts for both the community and Defence. A solution is to locate select facilities that require lesser levels of security outside the high security perimeters of bases. Examples are Navy, Army and Airforce Museums. While the museums are used principally in the training of ADF members, museums also serve a valuable purpose in linking communities to the Defence Force. Regional military units need strong links with regional communities; they are neighbours and cooperative arrangements help both parties. It is common for members of local communities to become volunteers as guides and researchers at Defence museums. Social and economic bonds are strengthened through museums attracting visitors from distances away from a rural and regional community. Increased visitation helps local economies. And it helps Defence in connecting to Australians, particularly in support of recruitment. The proposed Armour and Artillery Museum at Puckapunyal/Seymour in Victoria is only one and a half hours drive from Melbourne’s northern and inner suburbs. A day trip from a major population centre is highly marketable and increases visits. The museum project is worth over $20 million. Such investment should be shared with the broader community where possible. Social bonds extend to training at Defence museum facilities for school and tertiary students undertaking related studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Eprints.Whiterose.Ac.Uk/2271
    This is a repository copy of New Inter-Modal Freight Technology and Cost Comparisons. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2271/ Monograph: Fowkes, A.S., Nash, C.A. and Tweddle, G. (1989) New Inter-Modal Freight Technology and Cost Comparisons. Working Paper. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds , Leeds, UK. Working Paper 285 Reuse See Attached Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ White Rose Research Online http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Institute of Transport Studies University of Leeds This is an ITS Working Paper produced and published by the University of Leeds. ITS Working Papers are intended to provide information and encourage discussion on a topic in advance of formal publication. They represent only the views of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views or approval of the sponsors. White Rose Repository URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2271/ Published paper Fowkes, A.S., Nash, C.A., Tweddle, G. (1989) New Inter-Modal Freight Technology and Cost Comparisons. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds. Working Paper 285 White Rose Consortium ePrints Repository [email protected] Working Paper 285 December 1989 NEW INTER-MODAL FREIGHT TECHNOLOGY AND COST COMPARISONS AS Fowkes CA Nash G Tweddle ITS Working Papers are intended to provide information and encourage discussion on a topic in advance of formal publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 23: Track Materials
    SECTION 23 TRACK MATERIALS 23.1 Securing Sleepers in Bundles 23.2 Loading Used sleepers 23.3 Loading New Sleepers 23.4 Concrete Sleepers 23.5 ETC wagon loading 23.6 Transportation of Welded Rails 23.1 SECURING SLEEPERS IN BUNDLES Some methods of securing sleepers in bundles have proved to be suspect. BUNDLING WOODEN SLEEPERS DO… Place into bundles of 25 maximum. Band with two metal strapping bands placed 300 mm from each end of the sleepers. DO NOT… DO NOT use a single metal band DO NOT use single or double No. 8 wire. DO NOT use plastic/nylon (blue) strapping. Single banding and No. 8 wire may allow sleepers to work loose. Plastic / nylon strapping wears against the sleepers and can break in transit. 15 November, 2017 FREIGHT HANDLING CODE Page 23.1 23.2 LOADING USED SLEEPERS TPR sleepers are more uniform in section than recovered hardwood sleepers, so different stacking methods are employed. These are shown in Diagram 23.1. DO… TPR SLEEPERS: Load in stacks of four to the wagon (US). HARDWOOD SLEEPERS: Load in stacks of three. Two bundles form the base of the stack with one bundle on top in the centre of the wagon. Refer to Diagram 18.2 Use good quality dunnage on the wagon floor and between layers. Dunnage must extend completely across the load with no short lengths. Load up to 4 stacks per wagon on wagons with 8 bond chains. Load up to 3 stacks per wagon on wagons with 6 bond chains. Ensure stanchions and headboards are in place.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary and Generalization of the Conrail Electrification Study Results for Application to Other Railroads
    / ) 6 Contract No. DOT-TSC-1686 SUMMARY AND GENERALIZATION OF THE CONRAIL ELECTRIFICATION STUDY RESULTS FOR APPLICATION TO OTHER RAILROADS Edward G. Schwarm Arthur D. Little, Inc. Acorn Park Cambridge, MA 02140 MARCH, 1980 FINAL REPORT Prepared for U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS CENTER Kendall Square Cambridge, MA 02142 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. .4 . Title, and Subti tle 5. Report Date March 27, 1980 Summary and Generalization of the Conrail Electrifi­ cation Study Results for Application to Other Rail­ 6e Performing Organization Coda roads DTS-742 8. Performing Organization Report No. 7. Author'*) * Edward G. Schwarm 83054 9, Performing Orgoniration Nomo and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) R-933/RR-932 Arthur D. Little, Inc.“ Acorn Park 11. Contract or Grant No. Cambridge, MA 02140 DOT-TSC-1686 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Nome and Address Final Report, April 1979 U.S. Department of Transportation to March 1980 .Federal Railroad.Administration Office of Research and Development T4« Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D.C. 20590 RRD-22 15. Supplementary Notes * Report prepared under contract to: Transportation Systems Center, U.S. Department of Transportation, Kendall Square, Cambridge, MA 02142 16. Abstract The recent railroad electrification feasibility study of the Conrail line segment from Harrisburg to Pittsburgh is reviewed in this report. Approach to design and operational strategy are discussed. A summary of costs and units for various investment and cost items is presented, escalated into 1980 dollars. Of particular interest to the reader are the comments regarding the more general application of the methodology and cost figures to subsequent railroad electri­ fication studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Freight Study
    Wigan Rail Freight Study Final Report Prepared for: Transport for Greater Manchester & Wigan Council by MDS Transmodal Limited Date: May 2012 Ref: 211076r_ver Final CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Background 2. Freight Activity in North West and Wigan 3. Inventory of Intermodal Terminals in North West 4. Economics of Rail Freight 5. Future Prospects and Opportunities 6. Summary, Conclusions and Next Steps Appendix: Data Tables COPYRIGHT The contents of this document must not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part without the written consent of MDS Transmodal 1. INTRODUCTION Wigan Council (alongside Transport for Greater Manchester ± TfGM) commissioned MDS Transmodal in December 2011 to undertake a study into rail freight within the Wigan Council area. The main objective of the study was to identify existing use of rail freight, assess realistic future prospects and determine what kind of facilities would need to be developed. The study will inform the development of a wider transport strategy for Wigan Council. This technical report documHQWSURYLGHVDVXPPDU\RIWKHVWXG\¶VPDLQILQGLQJV,WEURDGO\ covers the following: Background information and data concerning the rail freight sector nationally; An assessment of cargo currently lifted in the North West and Wigan area; An inventory of existing non-bulk rail terminal facilities in the North West and planned terminal developments; The economics of rail freight; Realistic future prospects and opportunities for rail in the Wigan area, including the identification of large freight traffic generators in the Wigan area i.e. organisations which potentially have sufficient traffic, either individually or combined, to generate full-length rail freight services; and Overall conclusions and recommended next steps.
    [Show full text]
  • TTGGMC Newsletter
    Tea Tree Gully Gem & Mineral Club Inc. (TTGGMC) April Clubrooms: Old Tea Tree Gully School, Dowding Terrace, Tea Tree Gully, SA 5091. Edition Postal Address: Po Box 40, St Agnes, SA 5097. President: Ian Everard. H: 8251 1830 M: 0417 859 443 Email: [email protected] 2016 Secretary: Claudia Gill. M: 0419 841 473 Email: [email protected] Treasurer: Russell Fischer. Email: [email protected] "Rockzette" Tea Tree Gully Gem & Mineral Club News In This Edition… President’s Report Meetings, Courses & Fees. Hi All, Diary Dates Meetings Don McColl is doing a presentation on, st Stop Press Club meetings are held on the 1 Thursday of Harts Range, N.T.; hope you all can make President's Report. each month except January: Club Activities. it. Apologies from Janet, Mel and myself Committee meetings start at 7.00 pm. General Meetings, Courses & Fees. for the April meeting as we will be on our meetings - arrive at 7.30 pm for 8.00 pm start. Member’s Mineral Purchases. way to the Canberra ‘Rockswap’. ‘Shell Grotto’ Article. Cheers, Ian. Faceting (times to be advised) General Interest - Workshops. Course 10 weeks x 2 hours Cost $20.00. General Interest – ‘Flying Scotsman’, Handy Club Activities Use of equipment $1.00 per hour. Hints, and Nancy’s Travel Poem. Lapidary (Tuesday mornings) Members Notice Board Competitions Course 5 weeks x 2 hours Cost $10.00. Competitions have been suspended indefinitely and are currently replaced Use of equipment $1.00 per hour. Diary Dates with members showcasing an interesting Silver Craft (Friday mornings) part of their collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport
    MITCHELL SHIRE COUNCIL. PUBLIC TRANSPORT. Improving Public Transport in Mitchell Shire Preliminary Business Case May 2018 Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 3 1 Part 1 Problem ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Definition of the Problem......................................................................................... 12 1.3 Evidence of the Problem ......................................................................................... 12 1.4 Timing Considerations ............................................................................................ 20 1.5 Consideration of the Broader Context ..................................................................... 20 2 Part 2 Benefits ..................................................................................................................... 21 2.1 Benefits to be Delivered .......................................................................................... 21 2.2 Importance of the Benefits to Government .............................................................. 21 2.3 Evidence of Benefit Delivery ................................................................................... 22 2.4 Interdependencies .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report 04/2018
    Rail Accident Report Freight train derailment at Lewisham, south- east London 24 January 2017 Report 04/2018 February 2018 This investigation was carried out in accordance with: l the Railway Safety Directive 2004/49/EC; l the Railways and Transport Safety Act 2003; and l the Railways (Accident Investigation and Reporting) Regulations 2005. © Crown copyright 2018 You may re-use this document/publication (not including departmental or agency logos) free of charge in any format or medium. You must re-use it accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and you must give the title of the source publication. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This document/publication is also available at www.gov.uk/raib. Any enquiries about this publication should be sent to: RAIB Email: [email protected] The Wharf Telephone: 01332 253300 Stores Road Fax: 01332 253301 Derby UK Website: www.gov.uk/raib DE21 4BA This report is published by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch, Department for Transport. Preface Preface The purpose of a Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) investigation is to improve railway safety by preventing future railway accidents or by mitigating their consequences. It is not the purpose of such an investigation to establish blame or liability. Accordingly, it is inappropriate that RAIB reports should be used to assign fault or blame, or determine liability, since neither the investigation nor the reporting process has been undertaken for that purpose. The RAIB’s findings are based on its own evaluation of the evidence that was available at the time of the investigation and are intended to explain what happened, and why, in a fair and unbiased manner.
    [Show full text]