DOCSLIB.ORG

Long Income National Distribution & Headquarters Investment Opportunity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Long Income National Distribution & Headquarters Investment Opportunity connecting brilliant ideas connecting brilliant ideas LONG INCOME NATIONAL DISTRIBUTION & HEADQUARTERS INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY 1 connecting brilliant ideas EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Rare opportunity to acquire a major high-street retailer’s sole UK distribution centre and national headquarters Prime distribution unit located on Brookfields Park, Rotherham in the heart of the Dearne Valley Triangle, close to the M1, A1(M) and M18 Motorways and major conurbations such as Sheffield, Leeds, Barnsley and Wakefield Highly specified, modern head office and distribution facility, built in 2007 and extending to 198,272 sq ft (18,420 sq m). The unit has 12m eaves, 50m yard, 80kN/sq m floor loading, 1:10,500 sq ft loading provision and 80 car spaces. To enable additional parking, the tenant has inserted a temporary barrier in the yard to provide a further 50 spaces for van and back office staff parking Let to Maplin Electronics Limited for a term of 25 years expiring 19th December 2032 providing 15.2 years unexpired term Current passing rent of £1,006,000 per annum equating to a low £5.07 per sq ft (£54.57 per sq m) With 217 stores, Maplin operates an extensive store replenishment and multi- channel distribution platform from the unit via their established online, telephone, and mail order sales service Other high-profile occupiers nearby include Next, ASOS, Symphony Group, Royal Mail, Pegler, Capita, RBS Lombard and Cepac We are instructed to seek offers in excess of£16,830,000 (Sixteen Million, Eight Hundred and Thirty Thousand Pounds) reflecting aNet Initial Yield of 5.60% (allowing for purchaser’s costs of 6.76%) and a capital value of £85 per sq ft (£914 per sq m). 2 connecting brilliant ideas Next CEPAC Garnett Dickenson Brookfields Way Thetford Pegler Yorkshire Capita A6023 / Manvers Way 3 connecting brilliant ideas Harrogate YORK Skipton A1(M) Leeds Bradford International LEEDS M1 KINGSTON LOCATION BRADFORD M621 UPONHULL The Property is well located on the established Location Distance (miles) BLACKBURN M606 M65 Brookfields Park, Rotherham. The park is M62 R Humber Bridge I Goole V M1 Junction 36 7 E prominent in the Dearne Valley region which M62 R H Wakefield U A1 M itself is formed by the triangle connecting A1(M) Junction 37 8 B E Barnsley, Doncaster and Rotherham. R M18 Junction 1 9 M62 M18 Immingham Approximately 80% of the UK population can be M66 M1 A19 A18 Scunthorpe accessed in a 4.5 hour HGV drive time. Barnsley 6 Bolton A18 M181 A627(M) M180 GRIMSBY A629 A614 Doncaster 10 M61 Barnsley A635 The Rotherham and Doncaster area play an Sheffield 13 A628 J36 important distribution function within the J3 Leeds 30 MANCHESTER J35/2 Robin Hood densely populated South Yorkshire region, A638 Airport M67 ROTHERHAM approximately 13 miles (21 km) north east of Manchester 40 M60 M18 A1(M) Bawtry Sheffield, 30 miles (48 km) south east of Leeds A61 J34 Birmingham 85 J33 A631 and 155 miles (248 km) north of London. J32 A630 London 155 J31 M56 Manchester A1 Airport SHEFFIELD A57 M1 Worksop Liverpool A619 Macclesfield Buxton A61 Lincoln A619 M6 Road Rail Air Port Located in the heart of the UK’s motorway The area benefits from excellent rail access Rotherham is served by Doncaster Robin Hood The port of Hull is 60 miles (97 km) to the north network the Property benefits from excellent at Doncaster - a major station on the East Airport at Finningley, approximately 15 miles east, with unencumbered access from the Newark-on-Trent access to the M1 Motorway at Junction 36 Coast Main Line providing direct rail services (24 km) south east, which provides flights to subject property via the M18/M62, handling to the west and the A1 (M) at Junction 37 to London King’s Cross with a journey time of domestic and international destinations and over 12 million tonnes of cargo each year. It is NEWCASTLEUNDERLYME to the east. This in turn links with the M18 approximately 1 hour 29 minutes. can also handle the largest cargo planes. the fourth largest in Northern Europe, providing Motorway at Junction 1, 9 miles (14 km) to vital links with mainland Europe, Scandinavia the south, providing easy access to the wider Doncaster International Railport, run by Manchester Airport is located at Ringway, and the Baltic NOStatesTTINGHA for bothM passenger and UK motorway network. Major cities such as Freightliner Group, is located 11 miles (18 km) 50 miles (80 km) south west of the subject cargo vessels. Grantham M6 DERBY Sheffield, Leeds and Manchester are within 35, east of the property. The rail freight terminal property. It is the third largest airport in the UK 50 and 85 minutes’ drive time respectively. currently handles 37,000 deep-sea containers providing flights to over 200 destinations. The a year. airport is also the fourth busiest UK airport for M1 freight handling. Staord LOUGHBOROUGH 4 M54 M6 Toll connecting brilliant ideas Leeds 47 A 6 3 3 A610 SITUATION 46 A63 M621 45 A1(M) BARNSLEY Situated on44 Brookfields Way and accessed via the A6195, the property is 7.5 miles (12 km) east r Ba nsley Road A635 B Sal of Junction 36 of the M1 and 8 miles (13 km) west of Junctions 36 and 37 of the A1 (M) both a ter Doncaster R r sb oad Road 37 28 n roo Barnsley 29 s k R 30 l oa e y d A635 taking approximatelyM6 152 minutes’ drive time. Ro a 32a d 31 A6 32 A633 35 M1 5 33 9 1 6 The area is very popular with both manufacturing and distribution companies. Given the Va A A1(M) lle y Wa abundance of suitably skilled low cost labour, notable occupiers include ASOS, Symphony, y M a n v Next, Royal Mail, Pegler, Morphy Richards, Garnett Dickinson, RBS Lombard, Cepac and Capita. e wa r ark y 95 A61 s A628 P A61 95 W A1 Valley ay A6023 e G rn o a l e d D e Edinburgh n Glasgow W 36 S a m th 38 M8 R i 36 t oa h d d a i Ro e D ster A1 s onca L A6 a 02 n A 3 38 e 602 2 M1 35 Barnsley A1(M)M74 37 2 A635 37 35a A69 Newcastle Carlisle A695 M1 36 36 A616 A633 A1(M) 35 M18 A74(M) A A630 62 M18 9 3 35 Drive Times U 2 p 1 A Rotherham p 6 e 6 1 hour r A W 1 A629 o 2 A65 rt 3 2 hours ley Ro Rotherham ad 34 3 hours Leeds Hull 4 hours ROTHERHAM M1 Immingham M62 M180 Manchester Grimsby A A57 60 M18 SHEFFIELD 21 Liverpool M56 Sheffield A635 M6 A6 A46 M1 A1 Employment by Occupation Gross Weekly Pay A5 Norwich Leicester M54 Peterborough A47 £550 A43 A10 £541 Birmingham 8.1% £540 A49 Corby Manufacturing A14 A11 £530 A43 11.5% Northampton Cambridge £520 Ipswich A487 M1 A12 £510 Milton 6.3% £498 M40 A1(M) M11 Process plant and A40 Keynes A40 Colchester (£) £500 machine operatives 10.9% £485 M5 £490 London Gateway Reading £480 M4 LONDON M4 Elementary 10.7% Cardiff Bristol M2 £470 A34 occupations M25 M3 M20 Dover 11.8% £460 M23 Workforce Gross Weekly Wage Wage Weekly Gross Workforce A3 Folkestone £450 A303 A23 M27 A27 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% Rotherham Yorkshire & Great Britain A27 Southampton Brighton The Humber A35 UK Average Rotherham Exeter Plymouth 5 connecting brilliant ideas DESCRIPTION Constructed in 2007, the Property comprises a high-quality, modern, detached two-bay steel portal frame distribution warehouse with ancillary office accommodation totalling 198,272 sq ft (18,420 sq m). In addition, the Property is built to the following specification: Steel portal frame construction Clear working eaves height of 12m 17 dock level loading doors 2 level access doors High floor loading capacity of 80KN/sq m Heating and lighting system Sprinkler system 88 car parking spaces Unrestricted 24-hour use CCTV system 50m yard with additional 31 trailer spaces 2-storey offices with air-conditioning, suspended ceilings, recessed lighting and perimeter trunking ACCOMMODATION The Property has been measured in accordance with the RICS Code of Measuring Practice (Seventh Edition) on a Gross Internal Area (GIA) basis, and provides the following approximate areas: Floor Use Area (sq m) Area (sq ft) Ground Warehouse 15,800 170,070 Ground Office 1,310 14,101 First Office 1,310 14,101 Total 18,420 198,272 6 connecting brilliant ideas 7 connecting brilliant ideas SITE TENANCY The site extends to 8.48 acres (3.43 hectares). The Property is let to Maplin Electronics Limited for a term of 25 years, from 20th December 2007 and expiring 19th December 2032, providing approximately 15.2 years term certain. TENURE The current rent passing of £1,006,000 per annum equates to £5.07 per sq ft (£54.57 per sq m). The Property is held Freehold. The Full Repairing and Insuring lease is subject to 5 yearly upwards only open market rent reviews. Tenant sq ft Lease Start Lease End Rent Review Rent pa Rent psf Maplin Electronics 198,272 20/12/2007 19/12/2032 20/12/2017 £1.006m £5.07 Limited COVENANT INFORMATION Founded in 1972 Maplin Electronics Limited, trading name ‘Maplin’, are a leading consumer electronics specialist with over 3,200 employees operating in 217 retail stores across the UK and Ireland specialising in the sale of electronic goods. They also operate an extensive online, telephone and mail-order sales service.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A1 Corridor Logistics Assessment
    AUGUST 2021 AUGUST A1 Corridor Logistics Assessment: Bassetlaw Council Final Report Iceni Projects Limited ICENI PROJECTS LIMITED August 2021 : Iceni Projects London: Da Vinci House, 44 Saffron Hill, London, EC1N 8FH Edinburgh: 11 Alva Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4PH Glasgow: 177 West George Street, Glasgow, G2 2LB Manchester: This is the Space, 68 Quay Street, Manchester, M3 3EJ A1 Corridor Logistics Assessment Logistics Corridor A1 FINAL REPORT t: 020 3640 8508 | w: iceniprojects.com | e: [email protected] linkedin: linkedin.com/company/iceni -projects | twitter: @iceniprojects 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 LOGISTICS PROPERTY MARKET AREA ................................................................. 2 POLICY AND LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................ 7 MARKET REVIEW – DEMAND ASSESSMENT ....................................................... 14 SUPPLY ASSESSMENT........................................................................................... 22 ROLE IF THE A1 IN WIDER MARKET CONTEXT ................................................... 26 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................ 28 APPENDIX A ..................................................................................................................... 30 0 INTRODUCTION Bassetlaw District Council has commissioned Iceni Projects Ltd to produce
    [Show full text]
  • An Uphill Struggle for the Right to Travel by Train
    AN INDEPENDENT VOICE FOR RAIL USERS No 154 £2 December 2017 An uphill struggle for the right to travel Picture: Paul Tattam by train SEE PAGE 2 PAGE ONE PICTURE: Chinley (and many other stations) deserve better access Our page one picture shows red- The sun should be setting on diesels up there too. The £70 million coated MP Ruth George surrounded national initiative for full accessi- By Chris Austin by people on the footbridge steps of bility on the railways launched in [email protected] Chinley station in October. 2016 by Transport Minister Alex- Since the shock announcement The High Peak MP promised to ander Dobrindt started, interest- from Transport Secretary Chris deliver an 800-signature petition ingly, with smaller stations with Grayling in July which brought to the Department for Transport, Picture: Paul Tattam less than one 1,000 entries/exits to a close the ambitious electri- calling for better access to the per day. Additionally the Ger- fication programme supported station. man “Northern Powerhouse” of previously by industry and Gov- Lifts and ramps can be life- Nordrhein-Westfalen has its own ernment, Railfuture has been Picture: NETWORK RAIL transforming for people with £900 million programme for the working to understand the issues disabilities but they help virtually modernisation of 150 of its 697 and what is best for the passen- everyone else, especially those with stations between 2017 and 2023, ger, the freight customer and the prams, luggage and bicycles too. by which date 80% of its stations railway which serves them. And Chinley is typical of many other will have step-free access (cur- None of us believes that the pres- stations throughout Britain where rently 73%).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft-Freight-Implementation-Plan.Pdf
    Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Role of Freight 4 3. Existing Conditions / Current Issues 5 4. Aspirations for Tees Valley Freight Network 21 5. Interventions 22 7. Action Plan 25 2 Draft Freight Implementation Plan 1. Introduction Tees Valley Combined Authority is the local transport authority for the Tees Valley. This is the Tees Valley Freight Implementation Plan, part of the first Strategic Transport Plan for the region, for the period up to 2029. It has been developed by the Combined Authority in collaboration with our five constituent Local Authorities, Darlington, Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Redcar & Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees. The Combined Authority has ambitious plans to grow the region’s economy and our Strategic Economic Plan aims to create 25,000 Our vision for new jobs and deliver an additional £2.8billion into Tees Valley by Tees Valley is: 2026. We are also developing a Local Industrial Strategy, an agreement between us and the Government on how we will To provide a high improve our economy over the next ten years and how this will quality, clean, feed into the Government’s overall UK strategy. quick, affordable, reliable and safe In order to ensure that everyone in Tees Valley is able to work, transport network study, enjoy and fully participate in these ambitious plans for the for people and future, we need a world-class transport system that also encourages inward investment. Transport is about connecting freight to move people and businesses in Tees Valley and beyond. Delivering a within, to and from world-class transport system that is fit for the future is a critical Tees Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Warehousing-And-Logistics-In-Leicester-And-Leicestershire-Managing-Growth-And-Change
    Warehousing and Logistics in Leicester and Leicestershire: Managing growth and change Leicester and Leicestershire Authorities Final Report April 2021 Prepared by GL Hearn 65 Gresham Street London EC2V 7NQ T +44 (0)20 7851 4900 glhearn.com With MDS Transmodal Ltd Iceni Projects Ltd Public Warehousing and Logistics in Leicester and Leicestershire: Managing growth and change, April 2021 Leicester and Leicestershire Authorities, Final Report Contents Section Page 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 Key messages from the report 10 1 INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT 20 Context 21 Study Area 21 Stakeholders 23 2 DRIVERS FOR CHANGE IN THE LOGISTICS MARKET 24 Better Delivery: The Challenge for Freight 24 National Planning Policy Framework and Planning Practice Guidance 31 National Planning Statement for National Networks 34 The Growth of E-commerce 35 Rail Freight Trends and Forecasts 41 Rail Network Enhancements 45 Highway Network Enhancements 50 Brexit 52 3 WAREHOUSING STOCK POSITION (2019) 60 4 PROPERTY MARKET REVIEW 67 Warehouse / Industrial Market Review 67 Warehousing Floorspace 70 Agent Consultation: Key Drivers and Trends 82 5 EXISTING SRFI RAIL FREIGHT VOLUMES 85 6 WAREHOUSE LAND SUPPLY AND SUPPLY TRAJECTORY, LEICESTERSHIRE AND ‘GOLDEN TRIANGLE’ 87 7 ESTIMATES FOR FUTURE STRATEGIC WAREHOUSING NEED – LABOUR DEMAND AND COMPLETIONS TRENDS 90 Labour Demand Model 90 Baseline Forecasts 94 Completions Trend Model 98 8 ESTIMATES FOR FUTURE STRATEGIC WAREHOUSING NEED – REPLACEMENT AND TRAFFIC GROWTH 102 9 TESTING DEMAND FORECASTS AND SUPPLY 113 Road Only Sites – Demand and Supply 122 10 FUTURE WAREHOUSE FLOORSPACE GROWTH SCENARIOS SUMMARY 127 GL Hearn Page 2 of 209 P:\Projects\Harborough District Council - Future of Wareshousing in Leicestershire - 20-322\4.
    [Show full text]
  • How Soon Is Now?
    HOW SOON IS NOW? The disruption and evolution of logistics and industrial property 2 3 INDEX INTRODUCTION AND INVESTMENT AND 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 DEVELOPMENT Introduction The investor view Executive summary Tipping the scales Addleshaw Goddard Policy recommendations A shift in shed requirements has led to big changes for the logistics sector M&G Real Estate Big is beautiful: why investors are chasing prime industrial assets Tritax Big Box Industrial is the high street of the future Legal & General Investment Management Mid-sized spread BMO Real Estate Partners Getting the fundamentals right Oxenwood Real Estate LLP Developer focus Trophy assets: a new perspective Addleshaw Goddard Fitting out and fitting in: how developers are making speculative development and mixed-use logistics schemes work Kier Property The Caddick case study Caddick Group Omega Warrington Miller Developments Direct rail termini can be a boon for logistics parks Verdion iPort 4 Market perspective INFRASTRUCTURE - WHAT ALTERNATIVES ARE 3 THERE TO ROAD? Challenges in the UK Logistics Market Savills Unlocking investment for rail as well as multi- modal sheds A commercial property trends perspective Addleshaw Goddard Aberdeen Asset Management Superports: why we need them and how to get them A regional view DP World London Gateway Gent Visick The importance of rail MDS Transmodal A European and global view Where needs investment, and how do we unlock it? Rail Freight Group A European view CBRE Global Investors A train wagon capacity perspective VTG Rail UK Cheap labour
    [Show full text]
  • Proof of Evidence on Behalf of Stop the West Midlands Interchange
    Strategic Rail Freight Interchange Proof of Evidence On behalf of Stop The West Midlands Interchange 8. Wrong Location Report In respect of the proposed West Midlands Interchange 1 Strategic Rail Freight Interchange Introduction This evidence has been prepared by a local community group opposed to the West Midlands Interchange proposed at Gailey, Four Ashes and Calf Heath in South Staffordshire. The community group was set up to represent the views of local residents. The group comprises of professional experts and local residents. It also has local political support from Gavin Williamson (South Staffordshire MP) and Jeremy Lefroy (Stafford MP). ‘Stop The West Midlands Interchange’ currently has over 2500 members from the neighbouring communities that will be directly or indirectly affected by the proposed development, these include the communities of Gailey, Four Ashes, Calf Heath, Hatherton, Penkridge, Brewood & Coven. We do not propose to repeat the objections made by the professional bodies, local authorities and political leaders we are merely seeking to offer a local perspective and provide our own views on this proposal, which is supported by evidence and professional experts. This report focuses on the Location of this development. This report should be read in conjunction with the other reports prepared by the group on the following matters: • Planning and Green Belt • Railway Infrastructure • Highways – including Independent Highways Consultants Traffic Examination • Health • Environment & ecological issues • Tourism / recreational issues • Agriculture • Supporting Information and • Answers to the Inspector’s Questions. 2 Strategic Rail Freight Interchange SUMMARY OF OUR OBJECTIONS This report examines reasons why this Location for an SRFI would be wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Freight & National Passenger Operators Route Strategic Plan
    Freight & National Passenger Operators Route Strategic Plan March 2019 as part of RF11 FNPO Route Strategic Plan – RF11 February 2019 Foreword and summary ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Route objectives ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Safety ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Train performance .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 20 Locally driven measures ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 25 Sustainability & asset management capability ....................................................................................................................................................................... 30 Financial performance ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Appendices Plr Vs 1.1) St Helens
    DRAFT PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF VINCENT GEORGE SANDWELL PLR VS 1 (APPENDICES PLR VS 1.1) ST HELENS METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL PARKSIDE ACTION GROUP (PAG) LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY APPLICATION REFERENCES: P/2018/0249/FUL – PARKSIDE LINK ROAD (ST HELENS) THE PLANNING INSPECTORATE REFERENCES: APP/H4315/V/20/3253230 - A49-A573 LINK ROAD (ST HELENS) APP/M0655/V/20/3253232 - A49-A573 LINK ROAD (WARRINGTON) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 PROPOSALs .................................................................................................................................. 5 3.0 CONTEXT ..................................................................................................................................... 7 4.0 MARKET DEMAND PARKSIDE PHASE 2 ..................................................................................... 17 5.0 STRATEGIC RAIL FREIGHT INTERCHANGE ................................................................................. 33 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................. 37 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The following Proof of Evidence is prepared by Vincent George Sandwell on issues of Need in relation to planning application P/2018/0249/FUL in relation to the Parkside Link Road. 1.2 I have received instructions from St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council (‘the Council’) acting as the Applicant. 1.3
    [Show full text]
  • East Coast - Scotland: Strategic Development Corridor SPOC
    This document is Not for Publication - On-going Research This document is Not for Publication - On-going Research East Coast - Scotland: Strategic Development Corridor SPOC Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................... 1 Strategic Dimension .............................................................................. 11 2 Introduction .................................................................................. 11 3 The Case for Change ...................................................................... 26 4 The Need for Intervention ............................................................. 74 5 Wider Context ................................................................................ 77 6 Option Assessment Process ........................................................... 80 7 Strategic Dimension Summary ....................................................... 98 Economic Dimension ............................................................................. 99 8 Introduction .................................................................................. 99 9 Approach to Cost Estimation ........................................................ 107 10 Quantified SDC Programme Impacts ............................................ 110 11 Economy Impacts ........................................................................ 119 12 Environment Impacts................................................................... 121 13 Social Impacts ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Letter for That Case Sets out That the Sale of Access Rights Does Not Preclude Network Rail from Taking Possessions When These Are Needed
    John Trippier Senior Executive, Access and Licensing Telephone: 020 7282 2122 Email: [email protected] Robert Williamson Ian Kapur Customer Relationship Executive – Freight Head of Capacity Planning Network Rail Ltd GB Railfreight Ltd 1 Eversholt Street 3rd Floor London 55 Old Broad Street NW1 2DN London EC2M 1RX 16 December 2020 Dear Rob and Ian Direction of the 11th Supplemental Agreement (SA) to the Track Access Contract dated 11 December 2016 (the TAC) between Network Rail Infrastructure Limited (Network Rail) and GB Railfreight Limited (GBRf) (the Parties) 1. The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) on 16 December 2020 under section 22A of the Railways Act 1993 (the Act) directed the parties to enter into the GBRf 11th SA of the TAC. This letter explains the reasons for the decision to direct a supplemental agreement which provides firm rights with 24-hour windows for 4D06 and 4D15, and contingent rights to expire on the Subsidiary Change Date 2022 (SCD 22) for 4N06, 4D08 (SX), 4D08 (SO), 4N08 (SX), and 4D12 (SO). 2. GBRf’s application for seven new 1-hour firm rights did not match Network Rail’s offer of contingent rights expiring in December 2021. Additional representations between the parties to ORR were needed to demonstrate evidence of their concerns. In particular, we asked Network Rail to provide evidence of its concerns on capacity. We have considered GBRf’s and Network Rail’s representations in our final directions. ORR’s review of the evidence and conclusions are summarised from page 7. Background GBRf’s application 3. GBRf sought seven new firm rights for new-to-rail Intermodal flows between Teesport and Doncaster i-Port terminal.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2019 Inter City Railway Society Founded 1973
    TTRRAA CCKKSS Inter City Railway Society – August 2019 Inter City Railway Society founded 1973 www.intercityrailwaysociety.org Volume 47 No.7 Issue 555 August 2019 The content of the magazine is the copyright of the Society No part of this magazine may be reproduced without prior permission of the copyright holder President: Simon Mutten - [email protected] (01603 715701) Coppercoin, 12 Blofield Corner Rd, Blofield, Norwich, Norfolk NR13 4RT Treasurer: Peter Britcliffe - [email protected] (01429 234180) 9 Voltigeur Drive, Hart, Hartlepool TS27 3BS Membership Sec: Colin Pottle - [email protected] (01933 272262) 166 Midland Road, Wellingborough, Northants NN8 1NG Mob (07840 401045) Secretary: Christine Field - [email protected] contact details as below for Trevor Chairman: filled by senior officials as required for meetings Magazine: Editor: Trevor Roots - [email protected] (01466 760724) Mill of Botary, Cairnie, Huntly, Aberdeenshire AB54 4UD Mob (07765 337700) Sightings: James Holloway - [email protected] (0121 744 2351) 246 Longmore Road, Shirley, Solihull B90 3ES Photo Database: Colin Pottle Books: Publications Manager: Trevor Roots - [email protected] Publications Team: Trevor Roots / Eddie Rathmill Website / IT: Website Manager: Trevor Roots - [email protected] contact details as above Social Media: Gareth Patterson Yahoo Administrator: Steve Revill Sales Manager: Christine Field contact
    [Show full text]
  • Solent to the Midlands Multimodal Freight Strategy – Phase 1
    OFFICIAL SOLENT TO THE MIDLANDS MULTIMODAL FREIGHT STRATEGY – PHASE 1 JUNE 2021 OFFICIAL TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 2. STRATEGIC AND POLICY CONTEXT ................................................................................................................................................... 11 3. THE IMPORTANCE OF THE SOLENT TO THE MIDLANDS ROUTE ........................................................................................................ 28 4. THE ROAD ROUTE ............................................................................................................................................................................. 35 5. THE RAIL ROUTE ............................................................................................................................................................................... 40 6. KEY SECTORS .................................................................................................................................................................................... 50 7. FREIGHT BETWEEN THE SOLENT AND THE MIDLANDS ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]