DOCSLIB.ORG

20 4 283 318 Esyunin Et Al.P65

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
20 4 283 318 Esyunin Et Al.P65 Arthropoda Selecta 20(4): 283318 © ARTHROPODA SELECTA, 2011 On the spider fauna (Arachnida: Aranei) of Kirov Area, Russia Î ôàóíå ïàóêîâ (Arachnida: Aranei) Êèðîâñêîé îáëàñòè, Ðîññèÿ S.L. Esyunin1, A.M. Laetin2, L.G. Tselishcheva3, A.N. Lyapunov4, A.V. Tiunov1 Ñ.Ë. Åñþíèí1, À.Ì. Ëàýòèí2, Ë.Ã. Öåëèùåâà3, À.Í. Ëÿïóíîâ4, À.Â. Òèóíîâ1 1 Department of Zoology, Perm State University, Bukireva Street 15, Perm 614600 Russia. 2 Lunacharskogo Street 11/2-87, Kirovo-Chepetsk, Kirov Area 613045 Russia. 3 Nurgush Reserve, Lenina Street 129À, Kirov 610002 Russia. 4 Kirpichnaya Street 14-98, Kirov 610046 Russia. 1 Êàôåäðà çîîëîãèè áåñïîçâîíî÷íûõ æèâîòíûõ, Ïåðìñêèé ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé óíèâåðñèòåò, óë. Áóêèðåâà 15, Ïåðìü 614600 Ðîññèÿ. 2 óë. Ëóíà÷àðñêîãî ä. 11/2, êâ.87, ã. Êèðîâî-×åïåöê, Êèðîâñêîé îáë. 613045 Ðîññèÿ. 3 Çàïîâåäíèê «Íóðãóø», óë. Ëåíèíà, 129À, Êèðîâ 610002 Ðîññèÿ. 4 óë. Êèðïè÷íàÿ 14, êâ. 98, Êèðîâ 610046 Ðîññèÿ. KEY WORDS: spiders, fauna, Kirov Area, Russia. ÊËÞ×ÅÂÛÅ ÑËÎÂÀ: ïàóêè, ôàóíà, Êèðîâñêàÿ îáë., Ðîññèÿ. ABSTRACT. A check-list of 296 spider species of ca (Clerck, 1758), to the regional list. Later, the same 152 genera and 27 families collected from Kirov Area author [Shernin, 1971] increased the spider species list is presented. Of them, 234 species are new to the of Kirov Area by 22 species. studied region. Local faunistic data and a distribution Regular investigations of the spider fauna of Kirov pattern of each species are provided. The records of area were initiated by Laetin (under the supervision of Pardosa monticola and Agyneta cauta from Kirov Area A.I. Shernin) at the Zoology Department of the Kirov are shown to be misidentifications, while those of Rob- State University in 1969. Results of the most intensive ertus scoticus and Xysticus ninnii remain doubtful. studies conducted between 1969 and 1974 were pre- sented by Laetin [1974] in his MSc thesis (unpub- ÐÅÇÞÌÅ. Äëÿ Êèðîâñêîé îáëàñòè ïðèâåäåí ñïè- lished). ñîê èç 296 âèäîâ èç 152 ðîäîâ è 27 ñåìåéñòâ ïàóêîâ. Later, a significant contribution to the spider fauna Äàíû òî÷êè òî÷êè íàõîäîê ïàóêîâ è èõ ðàñïðîñòðà- of Kirov Area was made by Garkusha [1978, 1980], íåíèå. Óêàçàíèÿ äëÿ Êèðîâñêîé îáëàñòè Pardosa who investigated the spider populations of Sphagnum monticola è Agyneta cauta îøèáî÷íû, à íàõîäêè bogs in the vicinity of Biological Station situated near Robertus scoticus è Xysticus ninnii ñîìíèòåëüíû. Totphyanoy Vil. (Orichev Distr.). Garkushas data, with minor comments, were recently repeated by Alalykina Introduction [2001]. Further scarse information on the spiders of Kirov Kirov Area is situated in the east part of the Russian Area can be found in the following three works: Plain and lies within the boreal zone which includes the Tyshchenko [1971] on Sitticus terebratus (Clerck, following three subzones: the middle taiga, the southern 1758), Ovtsharenko [1982] on Drassodes villosus taiga and the subzone of coniferous-broad-leaved forests (Thorell, 1856) and Drassylus lutetianus (L. Koch, (Map). 1866), and Oliger [1999] on Clubiona stagnatilis Although the spider fauna of Mari-El Republic, Kulczyñski, 1897, Erigone dentipalpis (Wider, 1834) Tartaria, Chuvashia [Krasnobaev, 2004: 389, 254 and and Macrargus rufus (Wider, 1834) from Sanchursk 238 species, accordingly] and Perm Area [Esyunin, Distr. Yet, in the Catalogue of spiders of the Middle unpublished data: 542 species] is well studied, the Volga region [Krasnobaev, 2004], data on 18 species information on spiders of Kirov Area remains inade- from Kirov Area are presented on the basis of Garkusha quate. The first records of three species, viz. Alloho- [1978], Ovtsharenko [1982] and Oliger [1999]. gna singoriensis (Laxmann, 1770), Araneus diadema- Thus, by the beginning of our research, 87 spider tus Clerck, 1758 and Argyroneta aquatica (Clerck, species have been known from Kirov Area. Of them, a 1758), from Kirov Area were made by Krulikovskiy record of Pardosa monticola (Clerck, 1758) is errone- [1908]. These data were repeated by Shernin [1960], ous, and those of Robertus scoticus Jackson, 1914 and who also added the fourth species, Tegenaria domesti- Xysticus ninnii (Thorell, 1872) remain doubtful. Six of 284 S.L. Esyunin, A.M. Laetin, L.G. Tselishcheva, A.N. Lyapunov, A.V. Tiunov the previously recorded species are absent from the Tselishcheva; Krugloe Boloto, sweeping, VIII.2009, material collected/studied by us. L.G. Tselishcheva. Provisional results of the survey of spider fauna Oparino District (35 species) from two localities were hitherto published by Esyunin [7], Bylina Reserve, 59.849N, 47.332E: the vicini- & Tselishcheva [2009] and Tiunov & Esyunin [2009]. ty of Nizhnayay Palomnitsa Vil., VIII.2008, L.G. Tse- In the present paper, we have summarized both the lishcheva; Molomy River, c. 22 km NE of Palomnitsa literature-derived and newly collected data on the Vil., VII.2010, L.G. Tselishcheva; Shechug River, c. 24 spiders of Kirov Area. A total of 296 species of 152 km NE of Palomnitsa Vil., VII.2010, L.G. Tselishcheva. genera and 27 families is currently known. [8], the vicinity of Oparino Vil., 59.850N, 48.284E, VVI.2007, IVV & VIIVIII.2008, Renzhina; Duvan- Material and metods noe Vil., VII.2006, A. Lyapunov. Verkhnekamskiy District (67 species) This study is based on the collections made by the [9], the vicinity of Lesnoe Vil., 59.799N, 52.139E, four authors in numerous localities of Kirov Area from 1969, 1970, V.1973, A.M. Laetin. 1969 to 2009. In addition, the small material taken by [10], the vicinity of Sozimskiy Vil., 59.739N, S.V. Elshin near Chernaya Kholunitsa Vil. (Omutninsk 52.253E, VIII.2008, L.G. Tselishcheva. Distr.) in 19861989 and the material collected by G.I. [11], the vicinity of Loino Vil., 59.737N, Yuferev from Bylina Reserve and the vicinity of 52.660E, 1975, VI.1978, A.M. Laetin, VII.2006, A. Shmelevo Vil. have also been incorporated. Detailed Lyapunov. information on the localities visited is given below. [12], Porysh River, left tributary of Kama River, 12 km NE Yuzhaki Vil., 60.125N, 53.184E, 1975, VII. 2007, V.M. Ryabov. Description of the collecting localities [13], the vicinity of Kirs, 59.352N, 52.248E, VIII. 2007, A. Lyapunov, VIII.2008, L.G. Tselishcheva. Middle taiga subzone Luza District (31 species) Southern taiga subzone [1], Protected territory Khristophorovskie Bolota, Shabalinskiy District (administrative centre the vicinity of Khristophorovo Vil., 35 km N of Luza, Leninskoe Vil.) (11 species) 60.902N, 47.240E, VIII.2007, L.G. Tselishcheva. [47], nr. Gostovskiy Vil., 58.350N, 46.683E, [2], the vicinity of Luza: recreation park Bor VII.2009, A.V. Tiunov. Ustalets and protected territory Romanovskiy Bor, Svecha District (48 species) 60.620N, 47.269E, VIII.2007, L.G. Tselishcheva. [14], the vicinity of Shmelevo Vil., 58.280N, [3], the vicinity of Lalsk, 60.752N, 47.625E 47.830E, VVI.2007, G.I. Yuferev. (centre): bank of Luza River, VI.1972, A.M. Laetin, Tuzha District (57 species) VI.2006, A. Lyapunov; Krasavinskiy Bor and [15], the vicinity of Karavannoe Vil., 57.790N, protected territories Vasilevskiy Bor, Rusinovskiy 47.647E, 1970, VI.1971, VIII.1972, VIII.1973, VII. Bor, Anikinskiy Bor, Potapovskiy Bor in the 1978, 1989, A.M. Laetin; Pizhemskiy Reserve: Ya- vicinity of Vakhrushevo Vil., Bor Zabore, Bor tantsy Vil., V.2008, L.G. Tselishcheva; Pizhma River Vysota and Somovskiy Bor in the vicinity of nr. Mari Kugalki Vil., VII.2008, L.G. Tselishcheva. Papulovo Vil., VIII.2007, L.G. Tselishcheva. Kotelnich District (158 species) [4], Godovo Vil., c. 60 km SE of Lalsk, 60.401N, [16], the vicinity of Kotelnich, X.2007, L.G. 48.386E, bank of Luza River, VI.2006, A. Lyapunov. Tselishcheva. Podosinovets District (103 species) [17], Nurgush Reserve: between Vishkil and Borovka [5], the vicinity of Podosinovets Vil., 60.272N, Villages, 58.097N, 48.299E, IVVIII.2008, L.G. Tseli- 47.063E (centre): Ustyanskiy Bor, Lermontovskiy shcheva; sweeping, pitfall-traps, VIVII.2009, A.V. Bor nr. Rovdino Vil., Khomyakovskiy Bor nr. Tiunov, L.G. Tselishcheva (154 species). Utmanovo Vil., Purtovskiy Bor nr. Sholga Vil., Orichi District (66 species) Gribinskiy Bor nr. Demyanovo Vil., Gladkoe [18], the vicinity of Shalegovo Vil., Zelenyi, Boloto nr. Yakhrenga Vil., Poskotino-Kalische Bog 58.362N, 48.891E, IX.2005, leg. A. Lyapunov. nr. Schetkino Vil., VIII.2007, L.G. Tselishcheva. [19], the vicinity of Torphyanoy Vil. [Garkusha, [6], Bylina Reserve, 60.101N, 47.236E (centre): 1980], Bystritsa Vil., 58.550N, 49.188E, VI.1973, Kaiskoe Boloto nr. Lodeino Vil. and Rogovskoe leg. A.M. Laetin. Boloto nr. Golovino Vil., V.2005, A. Lyapunov, VIII. Kirov (City Territory) (98 species) 2007, VI and VIII.2008, L.G. Tselishcheva, VIII.2008, [20], 58.597N, 49.670E (centre), Kirov (Chizhi, G.I. Yuferev, pitfall-traps, sweeping, VIVII.2009, A.V. Ganino, Kholunovo Lake), VVII.1972, VI.1973, Tiunov & L.G. Tselishcheva, VIII.2009, L.G. Tseli- 1976, 1978, A.M. Laetin, VIX.2005, A. Lyapunov, shcheva; Lodeino Vil., VII.2007, A. Lyapunov; Kre- VVII.2007, L.G. Tselishcheva; the vicinity of Kirov: stoviy Pochinok, Malogorskiy Bor nr. Golovino Vil., Goltsy Vil., 1971, 1978, A.M. Laetin; Kalinintsy VIII.2007, VI and VIII.2008, L.G. Tselishcheva; nr. Vil., VI.1969, A.M. Laetin; Kstinino Vil., VIV.1993, Golovino Vil., VIII.2008, G.I. Yuferev, VIII.2009, L.G. leg. L.G. Tselishcheva. On the spider fauna (Arachnida, Aranei) of Kirov Area, Russia 285 Map. Collecting localities (B: see for the explanations given in Description of the collecting localities) and the scheme of vegetation subzones (À) of Kirov Area. The vegetation subzones: MT middle taiga, ST south taiga, CBF coniferous and broadlieved forests. Êàðòà. Ëîêàëèòåòû (Â: îïèñàíèå ñìîòðè â ðàçäåëå Description of the collecting localities ) è ñõåìû ðàñòèòåëüíûõ ïîäçîí (À) Êèðîâñêîé îáëàñòè. Ðàñòèòåëüíûå ïîäçîíû: MT ñðåäíÿÿ òàéãà, ST þæíàÿ òàéãà, CBF õâîéíî-øèðîêîëèñòâåííûõ ëåñîâ.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On the Quaternary Reptilian Fauna of Bashkortostan (South Urals, Russia)
    ©Österreichische Gesellschaft für Herpetologie e.V., Wien, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at HERPETOZOA 19 (3/4): 99 - 110 99 Wien, 30. Jänner 2007 On the Quaternary reptilian fauna of Bashkortostan (South Urals, Russia) Zur Quartären Reptilienfauna von Baschkortostan (Südural, Rußland) VlNER KHABIBULLIN KURZFASSUNG Die Geschichte der quartären Reptilienfauna von Baschkortostan (Südural, Rußland) wird im Zusammen- hang mit einem kurzen Überblick zur Entwicklung des Klimas, der Landschaften und der Vegetation dargestellt. Fünf Reptilienarten {Lacerta agilis, Anguis fragilis, Lacerta vivipara, Natrix natrix, Vipera berus) sind für das Spätquartär des Untersuchungsgebietes anhand von Fossilbelegen nachgewiesen. Die neuzeitliche Herpetofauna des Urals begann sich im späteren Pliozän herauszubilden. Die gegenwärtige Reptilfauna entwickelte sich im mitt- leren Holozän, mit der Rückkehr der Reptilien aus den eiszeitlichen Refugialräumen. Die Gebirgsketten des Urals sowie die Tätigkeit des Menschen hatten auf die Ausbildung der gegenwärtigen Kriechtierfauna der Region keinen bedeutenden Einfluß. ABSTRACT The history of the Quaternary reptilian fauna of Bashkortostan (South Urals, Russia) is described and the development of climate, landscapes and vegetation are briefly reviewed. Five late Quaternary fossil reptile species {Lacerta agilis, Anguis fragilis, Lacerta vivipara, Natrix natrix, Vipera berus) had been identified for the region. The modern herpetofauna of the Urals started to form approximately in the Late Pliocene. In the
    [Show full text]
  • Permophiles Issue
    Contents Notes from the SPS Secretary ...........................................................................................................................1 Shen Shuzhong Notes from the SPS Chair ..................................................................................................................................2 Charles M. Henderson Meeting Report: Report on the Continental Siena Meeting, Italy, September 2006.....................................3 G. Cassinis, A. Lazzarotto, P. Pittau Working Group Report: Short report on 2005-2006 activities of the non-marine – marine correlation work- ing group of SPS ..................................................................................................................................................5 J.W. Schneider Report of SPS Working Group on “Using Permian transitional biotas as gateways for global correlation”7 Guang R. Shi International Permian Time Scale ...................................................................................................................10 Voting Members of the SPS ............................................................................................................................. 11 Submission guideline for Issue 49 ....................................................................................................................12 Reports: Ostracods (Crustacea) from the Permian-Triassic boundary interval of South China (Huaying Mountains, eastern Sichuan Province): paleo-oxygenation significance .......................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Toxic Archipelago: Preventing Proliferation from the Former Soviet Chemical and Biological Weapons Complexes
    Toxic Archipelago: Preventing Proliferation from the Former Soviet Chemical and Biological Weapons Complexes Amy E. Smithson Report No. 32 December 1999 Copyright©1999 11 Dupont Circle, NW Ninth Floor Washington, DC 20036 phone 202.223.5956 fax 202.238.9604 [email protected] Copyright©1999 by The Henry L. Stimson Center 11 Dupont Circle, NW Ninth Floor Washington, DC 20036 tel 202.223.5956 fax 202.238.9604 email [email protected] Preface and Acknowledgments This report is the second major narrative by the Stimson Center’s Chemical and Biological Weapons Nonproliferation Project on the problems associated with the vast chemical and biological weapons capabilities created by the USSR. An earlier report, Chemical Weapons Disarmament in Russia: Problems and Prospects (October 1995), contained the first public discussion of security shortcomings at Russia’s chemical weapons facilities and the most detailed account publicly available of the top secret chemical weapons development program of Soviet origin, code-named novichok. Toxic Archipelago examines another aspect of the USSR’s weapons of mass destruction legacy, the proliferation problems that stem from the former Soviet chemical and biological weapons complexes. Given the number of institutes and individuals with expertise in chemical and biological weaponry that have been virtually without the financial support of their domestic governments since the beginning of 1992, this report provides an overview of a significant and complex proliferation dilemma and appraises the efforts being made to address it. This topic and other issues of chemical and biological weapons proliferation concern are also covered on the project’s worldwide web page, which can be found at the Chemical and Biological Weapons Nonproliferation Project section of the Stimson web site at: www.stimson.org/.
    [Show full text]
  • T H E T I M E W O
    GEOGRAPHY OF THE WORLD UralsTHE TIMEWORN GEOGRAPHY OF THE WORLD UralsTHE TIMEWORN By Barbara A. Somervill THE CHILD’S WORLD® CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Published in the United States of America by The Child’s World® PO Box 326, Chanhassen, MN 55317-0326 800-599-READ www.childsworld.com Content Adviser: Photo Credits: Cover/frontispiece: TASS/Sovfoto. Interior: Bryan & Cherry Alexander: 18; Animals Animals/Earth Scenes: 9 (OSF/O. Mark Williams, Newman), 14 (Bradley W. Stahl), 17 (Darek Kapp); Corbis: 11 (Steve Raymer), 26 Associate Professor, (Dave G. Houser); Wolfgang Kaehler: 6; Wolfgang Kaehler/Corbis: 8, 16, 21; Jacques University of Colorado, Langevin/Corbis Sygma: 22; Novosti/Sovfoto: 4, 24; TASS/Sovfoto: 5, 12, 13. Boulder, Colorado The Child’s World®: Mary Berendes, Publishing Director Editorial Directions, Inc.: E. Russell Primm, Editorial Director; Melissa McDaniel, Line Editor; Katie Marsico, Associate Editor; Judi Shiffer, Associate Editor and Library Media Specialist; Matthew Messbarger, Editorial Assistant; Susan Hindman, Copy Editor; Sarah E. De Capua and Lucia Raatma, Proofreaders; Marsha Bonnoit, Peter Garnham, Terry Johnson, Olivia Nellums, Chris Simms, Katherine Trickle, and Stephen Carl Wender, Fact Checkers; Tim Griffin/IndexServ, Indexer; Cian Loughlin O’Day, Photo Researcher; Linda S. Koutris, Photo Selector; XNR Productions, Inc., Cartographer The Design Lab: Kathleen Petelinsek, Design and Page Production Copyright © 2005 by The Child’s World® All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means without written permission from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Somervill, Barbara A. The timeworn Urals / by Barbara A. Somervill. p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Discussion of the 1936 Constitution and the Practice of Soviet Democracy
    Speaking Out: The Public Discussion of the 1936 Constitution and the Practice of Soviet Democracy By Samantha Lomb B.A. in History, Shepherd University, 2006 M.A. in History, University of Pittsburgh, 2009 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Kenneth P. Dietrich School of of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2014 University of Pittsburgh Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences This dissertation was presented by Samantha Lomb It was defended on April 7, 2014 and approved by William Chase, PhD, Professor Larry E. Holmes, PhD, Professor Emeritus Evelyn Rawski, PhD, Professor Gregor Thum, PhD, Assistant Professor Dissertation Director: William Chase, PhD, Professor ii Copyright © by Samantha Lomb 2014 iii Speaking Out: The Public Discussion of the 1936 Constitution and the Practice of Soviet Democracy Samantha Lomb, PhD University of Pittsburgh 2014 The Stalinist Constitution was a social contract between the state and its citizens. The Central leadership expressly formulated the 1936 draft to redefine citizenship and the rights it entailed, focusing on the inclusion of former class enemies and the expansion of “soviet democracy”. The discussion of the draft was conducted in such a manner as to be all-inclusive and promote the leadership’s definition of soviet democracy. However the issues that the leadership considered paramount and the issues that the populace considered paramount were very different. They focused on issues of local and daily importance and upon fairness and traditional peasant values as opposed to the state’s focus with the work and sacrifice of building socialism.
    [Show full text]
  • Argus Nefte Transport
    Argus Nefte Transport Oil transportation logistics in the former Soviet Union Volume XVI, 5, May 2017 Primorsk loads first 100,000t diesel cargo Russia’s main outlet for 10ppm diesel exports, the Baltic port of Primorsk, shipped a 100,000t cargo for the first time this month. The diesel was loaded on 4 May on the 113,300t Dong-A Thetis, owned by the South Korean shipping company Dong-A Tanker. The 100,000t cargo of Rosneft product was sold to trading company Vitol for delivery to the Amsterdam-Rotter- dam-Antwerp region, a market participant says. The Dong-A Thetis was loaded at Russian pipeline crude exports berth 3 or 4 — which can handle crude and diesel following a recent upgrade, and mn b/d can accommodate 90,000-150,000t vessels with 15.5m draught. 6.0 Transit crude Russian crude It remains unclear whether larger loadings at Primorsk will become a regular 5.0 occurrence. “Smaller 50,000-60,000t cargoes are more popular and the terminal 4.0 does not always have the opportunity to stockpile larger quantities of diesel for 3.0 export,” a source familiar with operations at the outlet says. But the loading is significant considering the planned 10mn t/yr capacity 2.0 addition to the 15mn t/yr Sever diesel pipeline by 2018. Expansion to 25mn t/yr 1.0 will enable Transneft to divert more diesel to its pipeline system from ports in 0.0 Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr the Baltic states, in particular from the pipeline to the Latvian port of Ventspils.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTURE CITY CITY DELIVERY Region Terms of Delivery
    DEPARTURE Terms of delivery COST OF CITY DELIVERY Region CITY (working days) DELIVERY Moscow VIP - in Yekaterinburg Sverdlovsk 1 845 Moscow VIP - by Kazan Rep. Tatarstan 1 845 Moscow VIP - on Kaliningrad Kaliningrad 1-2 845 Moscow VIP - in Krasnodar Krasnodar region 1 845 Moscow VIP - around Krasnoyarsk (unless in Krasnoyarsk) Krasnoyarsk region 1 1420 Moscow VIP - Moscow Moscow 1 1420 Moscow VIP - in Nizhny Novgorod Nizhny Novgorod 1 845 Moscow VIP - in Novosibirsk Novosibirsk 1 1420 Moscow VIP - for Perm Perm 1 845 Moscow VIP - to Rostov-on-Don Rostov 1 845 Moscow VIP - by Samara Samara 1 845 Moscow VIP - in St. Petersburg Leningrad 1 1420 Moscow VIP - of Ufa Rep. Bashkiria 1 845 Moscow A.Kosmodemyanskogo village (Kaliningrad) Kaliningrad 2-3 550 Moscow Ababurovo (Leninsky district, Moscow region). Moscow 2-3 930 Moscow Abaza (Resp. Khakassia) Khakassia 6-7 1645 Moscow Abakan (rep. Khakassia) Khakassia 3-4 1180 Moscow Abbakumova (Moscow region). Moscow 2-3 930 Moscow Abdreevo (Ulyanovsk region.) Ulyanovsk 3-4 1300 Moscow Abdullno (Orenburg region). Orenburg 4-5 1060 Moscow Abdulov (Ulyanovsk region.) Ulyanovsk 3-4 1300 Moscow Abinsk (Krasnodar) Krasnodar region 3-6 1300 Moscow Abramovka (Ulyanovsk region.) Ulyanovsk 3-4 1300 Moscow Abramtsevo (Balashikha district, Moscow region). Moscow 2-3 930 Moscow Abrau Djurso (Krasnodar) Krasnodar region 3-5 1060 Moscow Avdon (rep. Bashkortostan) Bashkortostan 4 630 Moscow Aviators (Balashikha district, Moscow region). Moscow 2-3 930 Moscow Autorange (Moscow region). Moscow 2-3 930 Moscow Agalatovo (Len.oblasti) Leningrad 4 1060 Moscow Ageevka (Orel). Oryol 2-3 930 Moscow Aghidel (rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Agrarian Technologies in Russia in the Late XIX - Early XX Centuries: Traditions and Innovations (Basing on the Materials of Vyatka Province)
    ISSN 0798 1015 HOME Revista ESPACIOS ! ÍNDICES ! A LOS AUTORES ! Vol. 38 (Nº 52) Year 2017. Page 32 Agrarian technologies in Russia in the late XIX - early XX centuries: traditions and innovations (basing on the materials of Vyatka province) Tecnologías agrarias en Rusia a finales del siglo XIX-principios del XX: tradiciones e innovaciones (basándose en los materiales de la provincia de Vyatka) Alexey IVANOV 1; Anany IVANOV 2; Alexey OSHAYEV 3; Anatoly SOLOVIEV 4; Aleksander FILONOV 5 Received: 09/10/2017 • Approved: 21/10/2017 Content 1. Introduction 2. Methodology 3. Results 4. Conclusions Bibliographic references ABSTRACT: RESUMEN: Basing on a wide range of published and unpublished Basándose en una amplia gama de fuentes publicadas e sources the article examines the historical experience of inéditas, el artículo examina la experiencia histórica de introducing and disseminating new technologies of la introducción y difusión de nuevas tecnologías de agricultural production in the peasant economy of producción agrícola en la economía campesina de la Vyatka province in the late 19th and early 20th provincia de Vyatka a fines del siglo XIX y principios del centuries when the most important changes took place XX, cuando se produjeron los cambios más importantes in the agriculture of Russia. The most notable en la agricultura de Rusia. El fenómeno más notable phenomenon for the agricultural province was the para la provincia agrícola fue la introducción de una introduction of a multi-field (grass-field) crop rotation in rotación de cultivos
    [Show full text]
  • Winter in the Urals 7 Mountain Ski Resort “Stozhok” Mountain Ski Resort “Stozhok” Is a Quiet and Comfortable Place for Winter Holidays
    WinterIN THE URALS The Government of Sverdlovsk Region mountain ski resorts The Ministry of Investment and Development of Sverdlovsk Region ecotourism “Tourism Development Centre of Sverdlovsk Region” 13, 8 Marta Str., entrance 3, 2nd fl oor Ekaterinburg, 620014 active tourism phone +7 (343) 350-05-25 leisure base wellness winter fi shing gotoural.соm ice rinks ski resort FREE TABLE OF CONTENTS MOUNTAIN SKI RESORTS 6-21 GORA BELAYA 6-7 STOZHOK 8 ISET 9 GORA VOLCHIHA 10-11 GORA PYLNAYA 12 GORA TYEPLAYA 13 GORA DOLGAYA 14-15 GORA LISTVENNAYA 16 SPORTCOMPLEX “UKTUS” 17 GORA YEZHOVAYA 18-19 GORA VORONINA 20 FLUS 21 ACTIVE TOURISM 22-23 ECOTOURISM 24-27 ACTIVE LEISURE 28-33 LEISURE BASE 34-35 WELLNESS 36-37 WINTER FISHING 38-39 NEW YEAR’S FESTIVITIES 40-41 ICE RINKS, SKI RESORT 42-43 WINTER EVENT CALENDAR 44-46 LEGEND address chair lift GPS coordinates surface lift website trail for mountain skis phone trail for running skis snowtubing MAP OF TOURIST SITES Losva 1 Severouralsk Khanty-Mansi Sosnovka Autonomous Okrug Krasnoturyinsk Karpinsk 18 Borovoy 31 Serov Kytlym Gari 2 Pavda Sosva Andryushino Tavda Novoselovo Verkhoturye Alexandrovskaya Raskat Kachkanar Tura Iksa 3 Verhnyaya Tura Tabory Perm Region Niznyaya Tura Kumaryinskoe Basyanovskiy Kushva Tagil Niznyaya Salda Turinsk 27 29 Verkhnyaya Salda Nitza 4 Nizhny Tagil 26 1 Niznyaya Sinyachikha Chernoistochinsk Visimo-Utkinsk Alapaevsk 7 Verkhnie Tavolgi Irbit Turinskaya Sloboda Ust-Utka Chusovaya Visim Aramashevo Artemovskiy Verkhniy Tagil Nevyansk Rezh 10 25 Chusovoe 2 Shalya 23 Novouralsk
    [Show full text]
  • 136 Lexical Material of Regional Content in the Process Of
    Lexical material of regional content in the process of implementing the communicative approach in teaching English to students of non- linguistic specialties Vladimir B. Pomelov – Rezeda R. Khairutdinova – Nina I. Kryukova DOI: 10.18355/XL.2018.11.01.13 Abstract The purpose of this article is to study the positive, practical experience of using didactic (lexical) material of regional content in the process of implementing the communicative approach in teaching English to students of non-linguistic specialties. The leading method in the study is the pedagogical experiment (ascertaining, forming and control stages of the experiment), as well as the method of expert evaluations, statistical processing of quantitative research results, observation, questioning, modeling of situations, dramatization. The specificity of the authors’ method of applying the communicative approach, implemented in the form of a dialogue, using the vocabulary of a regional orientation, allows to increase the effectiveness of training sessions, raise the level of interest in learning English. The authors developed the content of training courses with regional orientation. The study proved the effectiveness of introducing lexical material of regional orientation. Key words: communicative approach, regional content of lexical material, the English language, teaching methods 1. Introduction 1.1. The urgency of the problem The current period of the development of Russian society is characterized, in particular, by the fact that nowadays, as never before, the youth faces a problem of receiving a high-quality education. The well-known definition of science as an engine of social progress can be supplemented by the definition of education as a driving force for the development of the personality of each individual member of the society.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy New Martyrs of Eastern Russia 2
    THE HOLY NEW MARTYRS OF EASTERN RUSSIA 2 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................3 1. HIEROMARTYR JOACHIM, ARCHBISHOP OF NIZHNI-NOVGOROD ........................... 5 2. HIEROMARTYR LAURENCE, BISHOP OF BALAKHNA .....................................................9 3. HIEROMARTYR AMBROSE, BISHOP OF SARAPUL ..........................................................18 4. HIEROMARTYR HERMAN, BISHOP OF VOLSK .................................................................22 5. HIEROMARTYR METROPHANES, ARCHBISHOP OF ASTRAKHAN ............................23 6. HIEROMARTYR LEONTIUS, BISHOP OF TSAREVO ..........................................................27 7. HIEROCONFESSOR PHILARET, ARCHBISHOP OF SAMARA.........................................28 8. HIEROMARTYR SERGIUS, BISHOP OF BUZULUK.............................................................29 9. HIEROCONFESSOR MICAH, BISHOP OF UFA....................................................................36 10. HIEROMARTYR STEPHEN, BISHOP OF IZHEVSK ........................................................... 40 11. HIEROCONFESSOR VICTOR, ARCHBISHOP OF VYATKA ............................................49 12. HIEROMARTYR NECTARIUS, ARCHBISHOP OF YARANSK ........................................71 13. HIEROMARTYR JOB, BISHOP OF NIZHEGOROD ............................................................89 14. HIEROMARTYR SINESIUS, BISHOP OF IZHEVSK............................................................90
    [Show full text]
  • Quaterly Report
    QUATERLY REPORT Open Joint Stock Company “VolgaTelecom” The issuer’s code: 0 0 1 3 7 - A For quarter IV of 2005 The issuer’s location: Russian Federation, 603000, Nizhny Novgorod city, M.Gorky square, Dom Svyazi The information contained in this quarterly report is subject to disclosure in accordance with Russian Federation legislation on securities General Director __________________ / S.V. Omelchenko / signature Name Date: February 14,2006 Chief accountant __________________ / N.I.Popkov / signature Name Date: February 14,2006 LS Contact person: Leading expert in securities Mrs. Mironova Elena Petrovna Phone: (8312) 34 22 10 Fax: (8312) 30 67 68 E-mail: [email protected] The address of Internet web-site(s) where the information contained in this quarterly report is disclosed: http://www.vt.ru/?id=312 1 Table of contents Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………..6 I. Brief data on persons forming the issuer’s management body structure, data on bank accounts, on auditor, appraiser, and the issuer’s financial adviser, and also on other persons who signed the quarterly report 1.1. Persons, forming the issuer’s management body structure ……………………………14 1.1.1. The issuer’s collegial management body ………………..………………….….14 1.1.2. The issuer’s collegial executive body ………………...………………………..14 1.1.3. The issuer’s single executive body …………………………………………….15 1.2. Data on the issuer’s bank accounts …………………………………………………….15 1.3. Data on the issuer’s auditor (auditors) …………………………………………………20 1.4. Data on the issuer’s appraiser ………………………………...………………. ………21 1.5. Data on the issuer’s advisers ………………………………………………………..…21 1.6. Data on other persons who signed this quarterly report ……………………………….22 II.
    [Show full text]