DOCSLIB.ORG

On the Quaternary Reptilian Fauna of Bashkortostan (South Urals, Russia)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Commissioner on National Minorities

    High Commissioner on National Minorities

    Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe High Commissioner on National Minorities The Hague, 12 January 2001 Dear Mr. Minister, In the beginning of last year the government of Ukraine requested me to investigate the situation of Ukrainian language education in your country. When I discussed this with your government, it offered to facilitate such an investigation. Earlier, your government had requested me to investigate the situation of Russian language education in Ukraine. The government of Ukraine also declared itself willing to facilitate such an investigation. In the summer of last year I have studied the situation of Ukrainian language education in your country, assisted by two experts, Prof. Bowring from the United Kingdom and Mr. Zhekov from Bulgaria. My conclusions are based on visits to Moscow, St. Petersburg and Tyumen, where conversations took place with local and regional authorities and with representatives of Ukrainian organisations. In Moscow extensive consultations took place with governmental authorities. While in Moscow, I also received representatives of Ukrainian organisations in Krasnodar, Ekatarinburg and Moscow Oblast. I want to thank your government for its co-operation. H.E. Mr. Igor Ivanov Minister of Foreign Affairs Moscow P.O. Box 20062 Telephone Telefax [email protected] 2500 EB, The Hague (+31-70) 312 55 00 (+31-70)363 59 10 http://www.osce.org Prinsessegracht 22 2514 AP, The Hague The Netherlands Earlier in the summer, I have conducted similar studies in Ukraine, again assisted by Prof. Bowring and Mr. Zhekov. I visited, Kharkiv, Lviv, Odessa and Simferopol, and met there with the local and regional authorities and with representatives of the Russian community.
  • Instrument of Ratification)1

    Instrument of Ratification)1

    Proposed Declaration (instrument of ratification)1 1. In accordance with Article 2, paragraph 1 of the Charter, the Russian Federation undertakes to apply the provisions of Part II to all the regional or minority languages spoken within its territory and which comply with the definition in Article 1. 2. In accordance with Article 2, paragraph 2, and Article 3, paragraph 1, of the Charter, the Russian Federation declares that the provisions set out below shall apply to the following languages in the specified territories: Abaza (Republic of Karachay-Cherkessia), Adyghe (Republic of Adygea), Aghul (Republic of Dagestan), Altai (Republic of Altai), Avar (Republic of Dagestan), Azeri (Republic of Dagestan), Balkar (Republic of Kabardino-Balkaria), Bashkir (Republic of Bashkortostan), Buryat (Republic of Buryatia), Chechen (Republics of Chechnya and Dagestan), Cherkess (Republic of Karachay-Cherkessia), Chuvash (Republic of Chuvashia), Dargin (Republic of Dagestan), Ingush (Republic of Ingushetia), Kabardian (Republic of Kabardino-Balkaria), Kalmyk (Republic of Kalmykia), Karachay (Republic of Karachay-Cherkessia), Khakas (Republic of Khakasia), Komi (Republic of Komi), Kumyk (Republic of Dagestan), Lak (Republic of Dagestan), Lezgian (Republic of Dagestan), Mountain and Meadow Mari (Republic of Mari El), Moksha and Erzya Mordovian (Republic of Mordovia), Nogai (Republics of Dagestan and Karachay-Cherkessia), Ossetic (Republic of North Ossetia), Rutul (Republic of Dagestan), Sakha (Republic of Sakha), Tabasaran (Republic of Dagestan), Tat (Republic of Dagestan), Tatar (Republic of Tatarstan), Tsakhur (Republic of Dagestan), Tuvan (Republic of Tuva) and Udmurt (Republic of Udmurtia) Article 8 – Education Paragraph 1.a.i; b.ii; c.ii; d.ii; e.ii; f.i; g; h; i. Article 9 – Judicial authorities Paragraph 1.a.ii; a.iii; a.iv; b.ii; b.iii; c.ii; c.iii.
  • Religion, Power and Nationhood in Sovereign Bashkortostan

    Religion, Power and Nationhood in Sovereign Bashkortostan

    Religion, State & Society, Vo!. 25, No. 3, 1997 Religion, Power and Nationhood in Sovereign Bashkortostan SERGEI FILATOV Relations between the nation-state and religion are always paradoxical, an effort to square the circle. Spiritual life, the search for the absolute and worship belong to a sphere which is by nature free and not susceptible to control by authority. How can a president, a police officer or an ordinary patriot decide for an individual what consti­ tutes truth, goodness or personal salvation from sin and death? On the other hand, faith forms the national character, moral norms and the concept of duty, and so a sense of national identity and social order depend upon it. Understanding this, states and national leaders throughout human history have used God for the benefit of Caesar. Even priests themselves often forget whom it is they serve. In all historical circumstances, however, religious faith shows that it stands outside state, nation and society, and consistently betrays the plans and expectations of monarchs, presidents, secret police, collaborators and patriots. It changes regardless of any orders from those in authority. Peoples, states, empires and civilisations change fundamentally or vanish completely because the basic ideas which supported them also vanish. Sometimes it is the rulers themselves, striving to preserve their kingdoms, who are unaware that their faith and view of the world are changing and themselves turn out to be the medium of the changes which destroy them. In the countries of the former USSR, indeed in all the former socialist camp, constant attempts to 'tame the spirit' were in themselves nothing new, but the histor­ ical situation, the level of public awareness and the character of religiosity were unique; and the use of religion for national and state purposes therefore acquired distinctive and somewhat grotesque characteristics.
  • Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The

    Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The

    ACFC/SR/II(2005)003 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 26 April 2005) MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Report of the Russian Federation on the progress of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities MOSCOW, 2005 2 Table of contents PREAMBLE ..............................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................4 2. The legislation of the Russian Federation for the protection of national minorities rights5 3. Major lines of implementation of the law of the Russian Federation and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities .............................................................15 3.1. National territorial subdivisions...................................................................................15 3.2 Public associations – national cultural autonomies and national public organizations17 3.3 National minorities in the system of federal government............................................18 3.4 Development of Ethnic Communities’ National
  • Investment Guide to the Republic of Bashkortostan | Ufa, 2017

    Investment Guide to the Republic of Bashkortostan | Ufa, 2017

    MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF BASHKORTOSTAN Investment Guide to the Republic of Bashkortostan Ufa 2017 Introduction by Rustem Khamitov, Head of the Republic of Bashkortostan 3 Greetings from Dmitriy Chaban, Managing Partner of Deloitte Ufa 4 Address by Oleg Golov, General Director of the Development Corporation of the Republic of Bashkortostan 5 General information about the Republic of Bashkortostan 6 Seven reasons for doing business in the Republic of Bashkortostan 8 Top-priority sectors for development 16 Government support initiatives for investors 20 Fostering innovation 27 Development institutions 32 Summary of statistics on the economic position of the Republic of Bashkortostan 36 Contacts 38 Investment Guide to the Republic of Bashkortostan Introduction by Rustem Khamitov, Head of the Republic of Bashkortostan Dear Friends, Welcome to the Investment Guide to the Republic Federal mechanisms of investment activity development of Bashkortostan! Bashkortostan is among the leading are used extensively. There is effective cooperation with and dynamically developing regions of Russia. Its location Vnesheconombank and the Monocity Development Fund aimed at the intersection of main traffic arteries, abundant resource at diversifying the economy of the single-industry regions potential, well-developed industry and infrastructure, as well of the republic, as well as increasing the investment inflows as highly skilled labor force, attract investors to our region. to them. One significant event of 2016 was the creation of social and economic development areas in such monocities as Belebey In terms of total investment to subjects of the Russian Federation, and Kumertau, where additional business support tools are used. Bashkortostan today remains in the top ten.
  • Contribution to the Knowledge of the Fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges And

    Contribution to the Knowledge of the Fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges And

    driemaandelijks tijdschrift van de VLAAMSE VERENIGING VOOR ENTOMOLOGIE Afgiftekantoor 2170 Merksem 1 ISSN 0771-5277 Periode: oktober – november – december 2002 Erkenningsnr. P209674 Redactie: Dr. J–P. Borie (Compiègne, France), Dr. L. De Bruyn (Antwerpen), T. C. Garrevoet (Antwerpen), B. Goater (Chandlers Ford, England), Dr. K. Maes (Gent), Dr. K. Martens (Brussel), H. van Oorschot (Amsterdam), D. van der Poorten (Antwerpen), W. O. De Prins (Antwerpen). Redactie-adres: W. O. De Prins, Nieuwe Donk 50, B-2100 Antwerpen (Belgium). e-mail: [email protected]. Jaargang 30, nummer 4 1 december 2002 Contribution to the knowledge of the fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges and Noctuidae of the Southern Ural Mountains, with description of a new Dichagyris (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae, Endromidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Noctuidae, Pantheidae, Lymantriidae, Nolidae, Arctiidae) Kari Nupponen & Michael Fibiger [In co-operation with Vladimir Olschwang, Timo Nupponen, Jari Junnilainen, Matti Ahola and Jari- Pekka Kaitila] Abstract. The list, comprising 624 species in the families Lasiocampidae, Endromidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Noctuidae, Pantheidae, Lymantriidae, Nolidae and Arctiidae from the Southern Ural Mountains is presented. The material was collected during 1996–2001 in 10 different expeditions. Dichagyris lux Fibiger & K. Nupponen sp. n. is described. 17 species are reported for the first time from Europe: Clostera albosigma (Fitch, 1855), Xylomoia retinax Mikkola, 1998, Ecbolemia misella (Püngeler, 1907), Pseudohadena stenoptera Boursin, 1970, Hadula nupponenorum Hacker & Fibiger, 2002, Saragossa uralica Hacker & Fibiger, 2002, Conisania arida (Lederer, 1855), Polia malchani (Draudt, 1934), Polia vespertilio (Draudt, 1934), Polia altaica (Lederer, 1853), Mythimna opaca (Staudinger, 1899), Chersotis stridula (Hampson, 1903), Xestia wockei (Möschler, 1862), Euxoa dsheiron Brandt, 1938, Agrotis murinoides Poole, 1989, Agrotis sp.
  • River Runoff Variability at Watercourses of the Ural River Basin

    River Runoff Variability at Watercourses of the Ural River Basin

    E3S Web of Conferences 163, 05002 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016305002 IV Vinogradov Conference River runoff variability at watercourses of the Ural river basin Regina Fatkhutdinova*, Diana Gareeva Bashkir State University, Zaki Validi 32, 450076, Ufa, Russia Abstract. The article is devoted to spatial and temporal variabilities of the river runoff on the example of the river Ural within the territory of the Russian Federation. The author points out the necessity of investigating fluctuations in the water resources of a transboundary river for the purposes of long-term water management planning. Using the coefficient of variation and asymmetry, the annual runoff variability is analyzed. 1 Introduction The rational use of water resources requires reliable data on the long-term variability of the quantitative characteristics of the river runoff. In this respect, it becomes necessary to conduct research on studying the multiannual runoff dynamics of individual river systems. Given the increasing volumes of water consumption, special relevance is attributed to identifying the trends in river runoff variations. While determining long-term changes in the water content, special attention is paid to the annual and maximum discharges [1]. The annual average throughflow values are used for identifying the river runoff rate, which serves as the basis of long-term water management planning. The data related to the absolute values of the maximum throughflow is needed primarily for preventing negative implications – the formation of floods, the water-logging of settlements, and the damaging of hydrotechnic facilities. The subject of research comprises the selected segments of the upper and middle reaches of the river Ural, including the meridional section within the Republic of Bashkortostan and the Chelyabinsk Region (the upper reaches of the river Ural) and the latitudinal section of the river in the Orenburg Region (the middle reaches).
  • Stages in Restructuring Bashneft Group's Petrochemical Assets

    Stages in Restructuring Bashneft Group's Petrochemical Assets

    Bashneft Group petrochemical assets consolidation and divestment Disclaimer This report contains a review of the financial position and operating results of JSOC Bashneft and includes operating results of Bashneft Group for the three months ended 31 March 2013. The terms “Bashneft”, “the Company”, “Bashneft Group” and “the Group” in various forms mean JSOC Bashneft and its subsidiaries and special purpose entities. The financial position and operating results analysed in this document are consolidated data on Bashneft Group. Certain statements in this report may contain assumptions or forecasts with respect to forthcoming events within Bashneft Group. Such statements may contain the words “is expected”, “is estimated”, “intends”, “will”, “could”, negations of these expressions or other similar expressions. These statements are only assumptions, and actual events or results may differ materially from them. The actual results of Bashneft Group may differ substantially from what is declared in our assumptions and forecasts as a result of a large number of factors. Such factors may include general economic conditions, Bashneft’s competitive environment, risks associated with operating in Russia, rapid technological and market changes in the Company’s areas of business, as well as many other risks directly related to Bashneft Group. The barrel-tonne conversion factor used in this report is 7.3. OVERVIEW Bashneft Group is one of Russia’s leading vertically integrated oil companies involved in crude oil production and refining, as well as in selling oil and petroleum products. The Group was established as an open joint-stock company on 13 January 1995 after the privatization of Bashneft production association.
  • Early Devonian Suprasubduction Ophiolites of the Southern Urals A

    Early Devonian Suprasubduction Ophiolites of the Southern Urals A

    ISSN 00168521, Geotectonics, 2010, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 321–343. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2010. Original Russian Text © A.A. Belova, A.V. Ryazantsev, A.A. Razumovsky, K.E. Degtyarev, 2010, published in Geotektonika, 2010, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 39–64. Early Devonian Suprasubduction Ophiolites of the Southern Urals A. A. Belovaa, b, A. V. Ryazantseva, A. A. Razumovskya, and K. E. Degtyareva a Geological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pyzhevskii per. 7, Moscow, 119017 Russia b Faculty of Geology, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991 Russia email: [email protected] Received January 25, 2010 Abstract—The composition of ophiolites widespread in the southern Urals shows that they were formed in a suprasubduction setting. LowTi and highMg sheeted dikes and volcanic rocks vary from basalt to andesite, and many varieties belong to boninite series. The rocks of this type extend as a 600km tract. The volcanic rocks contain chert interbeds with Emsian conodonts. Plagiogranites localized at the level of the sheeted dike complex and related to this complex genetically are dated at 400 Ma. The ophiolites make up a base of thick island arc volcanic sequence. The composition of the igneous rocks and the parameters of their metamorphism indicate that subduction and ascent of a mantle plume participated in their formation. The nonstationary subduction at the intraoceanic convergent plate boundary developed, at least, from the Middle Ordovician. DOI: 10.1134/S0016852110040035 INTRODUCTION differ from the Devonian counterpart in geochemistry. Subductionrelated ophiolites are widesperad in In some places, ophiolites differing in age and compo the Paleozoides of the southern Urals. Sheeted dikes sition converge and intercalate.
  • T H E T I M E W O

    T H E T I M E W O

    GEOGRAPHY OF THE WORLD UralsTHE TIMEWORN GEOGRAPHY OF THE WORLD UralsTHE TIMEWORN By Barbara A. Somervill THE CHILD’S WORLD® CHANHASSEN, MINNESOTA Published in the United States of America by The Child’s World® PO Box 326, Chanhassen, MN 55317-0326 800-599-READ www.childsworld.com Content Adviser: Photo Credits: Cover/frontispiece: TASS/Sovfoto. Interior: Bryan & Cherry Alexander: 18; Animals Animals/Earth Scenes: 9 (OSF/O. Mark Williams, Newman), 14 (Bradley W. Stahl), 17 (Darek Kapp); Corbis: 11 (Steve Raymer), 26 Associate Professor, (Dave G. Houser); Wolfgang Kaehler: 6; Wolfgang Kaehler/Corbis: 8, 16, 21; Jacques University of Colorado, Langevin/Corbis Sygma: 22; Novosti/Sovfoto: 4, 24; TASS/Sovfoto: 5, 12, 13. Boulder, Colorado The Child’s World®: Mary Berendes, Publishing Director Editorial Directions, Inc.: E. Russell Primm, Editorial Director; Melissa McDaniel, Line Editor; Katie Marsico, Associate Editor; Judi Shiffer, Associate Editor and Library Media Specialist; Matthew Messbarger, Editorial Assistant; Susan Hindman, Copy Editor; Sarah E. De Capua and Lucia Raatma, Proofreaders; Marsha Bonnoit, Peter Garnham, Terry Johnson, Olivia Nellums, Chris Simms, Katherine Trickle, and Stephen Carl Wender, Fact Checkers; Tim Griffin/IndexServ, Indexer; Cian Loughlin O’Day, Photo Researcher; Linda S. Koutris, Photo Selector; XNR Productions, Inc., Cartographer The Design Lab: Kathleen Petelinsek, Design and Page Production Copyright © 2005 by The Child’s World® All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means without written permission from the publisher. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Somervill, Barbara A. The timeworn Urals / by Barbara A. Somervill. p.
  • Argus Nefte Transport

    Argus Nefte Transport

    Argus Nefte Transport Oil transportation logistics in the former Soviet Union Volume XVI, 5, May 2017 Primorsk loads first 100,000t diesel cargo Russia’s main outlet for 10ppm diesel exports, the Baltic port of Primorsk, shipped a 100,000t cargo for the first time this month. The diesel was loaded on 4 May on the 113,300t Dong-A Thetis, owned by the South Korean shipping company Dong-A Tanker. The 100,000t cargo of Rosneft product was sold to trading company Vitol for delivery to the Amsterdam-Rotter- dam-Antwerp region, a market participant says. The Dong-A Thetis was loaded at Russian pipeline crude exports berth 3 or 4 — which can handle crude and diesel following a recent upgrade, and mn b/d can accommodate 90,000-150,000t vessels with 15.5m draught. 6.0 Transit crude Russian crude It remains unclear whether larger loadings at Primorsk will become a regular 5.0 occurrence. “Smaller 50,000-60,000t cargoes are more popular and the terminal 4.0 does not always have the opportunity to stockpile larger quantities of diesel for 3.0 export,” a source familiar with operations at the outlet says. But the loading is significant considering the planned 10mn t/yr capacity 2.0 addition to the 15mn t/yr Sever diesel pipeline by 2018. Expansion to 25mn t/yr 1.0 will enable Transneft to divert more diesel to its pipeline system from ports in 0.0 Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr the Baltic states, in particular from the pipeline to the Latvian port of Ventspils.
  • The State Hermitage Museum Annual Report 2012

    The State Hermitage Museum Annual Report 2012

    THE STATE HERMITAGE MUSEUM ANNUAL REPORT n 2012 CONTENTS General Editor 4 Year of Village and Garden Mikhail Piotrovsky, General Director of the State Hermitage Museum, 6 State Hermitage Museum. General Information Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 16 Awards Full Member of the Russian Academy of Arts, Professor of St. Petersburg State University, 20 Composition of the Hermitage Collection as of 1 January 2013 Doctor of History 40 Exhibitions 86 Restoration and Conservation 121 Publications EDITORIAL BOARD: 135 Electronic Editions and Video Films Mikhail Piotrovsky, 136 Conferences General Director of the State Hermitage Museum 141 Dissertations Georgy Vilinbakhov, 142 Archaeological Expeditions Deputy Director for Research 158 Major Construction and Restoration of the Buildings Svetlana Adaksina, Deputy Director, Chief Curator 170 Structure of Visits to the State Hermitage in 2012 Marina Antipova, 171 Educational Events Deputy Director for Finance and Planning 180 Special Development Programmes Alexey Bogdanov, Deputy Director for Maintenance 188 International Advisory Board of the State Hermitage Museum Vladimir Matveyev, 190 Guests of the Hermitage Deputy Director for Exhibitions and Development 194 Hermitage Friends Organisations Mikhail Novikov, 204 Hermitage Friends’ Club Deputy Director for Construction 206 Financial Statements of the State Hermitage Museum Mariam Dandamayeva, Academic Secretary 208 Principal Patrons and Sponsors of the State Hermitage Museum in 2012 Yelena Zvyagintseva, 210 Staff Members of