Hong Kong's Relationship with the Central Authorities/The Mainland
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
For meeting on 26 May 2014 Paper Ref.: CSD/1/2014 Commission on Strategic Development Hong Kong’s Relationship with the Central Authorities/the Mainland (Translation) Purpose This paper outlines for discussion Hong Kong’s relationship with the Central Authorities/the Mainland. Members are invited to give their views on related issues. “One Country, Two Systems” 2. On 19 December 1984, the Chinese and British Governments signed the Sino-British Joint Declaration, affirming that the Government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) will resume the exercise of sovereignty over Hong Kong with effect from 1 July 1997. Our country’s basic policies regarding Hong Kong and their elaboration have been set out in the Sino-British Joint Declaration1. The Central Authorities have established, in accordance with the provisions of Article 31 of the Constitution of the PRC2, a Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR). Our country’s basic policies regarding Hong Kong have been stipulated by the National People’s Congress (NPC) in a Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China (the Basic Law), and they will remain unchanged for 50 years. 3. The Basic Law was adopted on 4 April 1990 by the 7th NPC of the PRC and came into effect on 1 July 1997. The Basic Law is a set of national laws enacted by the NPC, and also a constitutional document on the HKSAR. It prescribes, in the form of a legal document, the systems to be practised in the 1 See sub-paragraph (12) of Part 3 and Annex 1 of the Sino-British Joint Declaration. 2 Article 31 of the Constitution of the PRC reads “The State may establish special administrative regions when necessary. The systems to be instituted in special administrative regions shall be prescribed by law enacted by the National People’s Congress in the light of specific conditions.” HKSAR in order to ensure the implementation of the basic policies of the PRC regarding Hong Kong. 4. Article 1 of the Basic Law states clearly at the outset that “the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is an inalienable part of the People’s Republic of China.” Under the “One Country, Two Systems” principle adopted by our country, the HKSAR enjoys a high degree of autonomy, which has been authorised by the Central Authorities. Article 12 of the Basic Law expressly states that “The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be a local administrative region of the People’s Republic of China, which shall enjoy a high degree of autonomy and come directly under the Central People’s Government.” 5. Under the premise of “One Country”, the Central Authorities have sovereignty over the HKSAR. The Central People’s Government is responsible for administering the defence and foreign affairs of the HKSAR as well as appointing the Chief Executive and the principal officials of the executive authorities of the HKSAR. Article 43 of the Basic Law stipulates that the Chief Executive of the HKSAR shall be the head of the HKSAR, shall represent the Region, and shall be accountable to the Central People's Government and the HKSAR in accordance with the provisions of the Basic Law. Article 48 of the Basic Law states that the Chief Executive of the HKSAR shall lead the government of the Region; be responsible for the implementation of the Basic Law and other laws which, in accordance with the Basic Law, apply in the HKSAR; implement the directives issued by the Central People’s Government in respect of the relevant matters provided for in the Basic Law; and conduct, on behalf of the Government of the HKSAR, external affairs and other affairs as authorised by the Central Authorities. Under the principle of “One Country, Two Systems” and the provisions of the Basic Law, the Chief Executive has a special and important constitutional role. On this basis, the Chief Executive is obliged to report regularly the work of the HKSAR Government and the situation of HKSAR to the Central People’s Government. 6. The HKSAR enjoys a high degree of autonomy but not absolute autonomy. Article 2 of the Basic Law points out that “the National People’s Congress authorises the HKSAR to exercise a high degree of autonomy and enjoy executive, legislative and independent judicial power, including that of final adjudication, in accordance with the provisions of this Law”. The Central Authorities have authorised the local government to exercise an extraordinary - 2 - high degree of autonomy and specified clearly the scope of the autonomy, which includes the executive, legislative, independent judicial and final adjudication power, and the power to handle external affairs. As the authorising body, the Central Authorities cannot delegate all its authorities. Therefore, it retains the power of national defence and foreign affairs as well as other powers outside the limits of the autonomy of the HKSAR3. 7. The Basic Law is an enabling legislation in nature. Under the theory of the unitary state structure, all powers exercised by the municipalities are conferred by the Central Authorities. Therefore, all legislation involving the relationship between the Central Authorities and municipalities, in particular, those governing the municipal organisations etc, are enabling legislation in nature. The executive, legislative and judicial powers exercised by the HKSAR are derived from authorisation by the Central Authorities, and there is no so-called “residual power”4. At the “Seminar in commemoration of the 10th anniversary of the implementation of the Basic Law in the HKSAR of the People’s Republic of China” in June 2007, Wu Bangguo, the then Chairman of the Standing Committee of the NPC said, “……. the high degree of autonomy enjoyed by the HKSAR is conferred by the Central Authorities. We are an unitary country. The high degree of autonomy of the HKSAR was not inherent to Hong Kong but granted by the Central Authorities.” Article 20 of the Basic Law states that “the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region may enjoy other powers granted to it by the National People’s Congress, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress or the Central People’s Government.” It shows that the Central Government has sovereignty over SAR while retaining the residual powers. On the other hand, it also indicates that the SAR enjoys the power to continue to accept other powers5 conferred by the Central Authorities. Professor Wang Zhenmin of Tsinghua University said that this requirement showed that the drafters of the Basic Law “departed from the traditional legislative practice and handled the question of ‘residual powers’ flexibly without compromising the principles. That means the Central Authorities retain all ‘residual powers’ while the SAR enjoys the power to 3 Wang Yu. ‘A study of the Authorisation Theory under the “One Country, Two systems” Framework’, Hong Kong and Macao Studies, Spring issue, 2013 (the 29th issue), Research Institute of Hong Kong and Macao of the Development Research Centre of State Council 4 Quoted from paragraph 12 of the statement made by the then Chief Secretary for Administration at the Legislative Council on 11 February 2004, informing Members of the Constitutional Development Task Force’s visit to Beijing in that month (see Annex B of Legco Paper CB (2) 1459/03-04 (03) for the full text). 5 Wang Zhenmin: “Relationship between the Central Authorities and the SAR— an analysis of the structure of the rule of law” Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, 2002, p. 174-175. - 3 - accept ‘other residual powers’ conferred by the Central Authorities”.6 Wu Bangguo also pointed out on the same occasion that the corresponding requirement of the Basic Law “has clearly defined the legal status of the HKSAR, indicating that the SAR is wholly under the China’s sovereignty. The HKSAR has as much power as that granted by the Central Authorities. According to Article 20 of the Basic Law, the Central Authorities may grant other powers to the SAR, which have not been clearly specified, and the question of so-called ‘residual power’ does not exist.” 8. The underlying goal of the principles and policies adopted by the Central Government concerning Hong Kong is to uphold China’s sovereignty, security and development interests, and maintain long-term prosperity and stability of Hong Kong. To implement the principles of “One Country, Two Systems”, “Hong Kong people administering Hong Kong” and a high degree of autonomy, we must both adhere to the one country principle and respect the differences of the two systems, both uphold the power of the Central Government and ensure a high degree of autonomy in the HKSAR, both give play to the role of the Mainland as the staunch supporter of Hong Kong and increase the HKSAR’s competitiveness. At no time should we focus only on one side to the neglect of the other7. Role of Hong Kong in National Development 9. Since the 1980s, the Mainland has been pushing forward with reform and open-up policies. Over the past 30-odd years, Hong Kong has brought funds, personnel, technologies and management experience into the Mainland, contributing to the country’s reform and opening up. As the Mainland economy develops rapidly, the Central Government has been fuelling the transformation of its economic development model and encouraging Mainland enterprises to tap the global market in recent years. 10. At the 3rd Session of the 9th NPC of the Communist Party of China in March 2000, President Jiang Zemin pointed out that “with the continuous development of China’s economy, we must play an active role in international economic competition, and strive to seize the initiative. We should also embrace every opportunity to pursue the ‘going out’ strategy, and combine the 6 Same as Note 5, p.