DOCSLIB.ORG

Russian Federation) Regarding the Preparedness for Responding to a Radiation Emergency

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russian Federation) Regarding the Preparedness for Responding to a Radiation Emergency FINAL REPORT PEER APPRAISAL OF THE ARRANGEMENTS IN THE ARCHANGELSK REGION (RUSSIAN FEDERATION) REGARDING THE PREPAREDNESS FOR RESPONDING TO A RADIATION EMERGENCY 04 – 14 July 2011 Archangelsk Region, Russian Federation International Atomic Energy Agency 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The mission team gained access to all principal organizations, which provided excellent cooperation and valuable input at all levels. The time spent with organizational counterparts in Moscow, Archangelsk and Severodvinsk was extremely productive. The professional interest and involvement on the part of representatives from critical response organizations with whom the mission team interacted was vital to the success of this mission. The mission team wishes to extend its special appreciation for the positive and active involvement of Professor L. A. Bolshov, Director of Nuclear Safety Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IBRAE RAN), for the excellent preparation of the mission and and Mr. V.V.Shishov, the Deputy Governor of the Archangelsk Region on natural resources and ecology, for providing access and consultation opportunity to all the organizations playing important roles in the regional nuclear or radiological emergency preparedness and response system. The visits provided valuable insights into the challenges faced by the regional government, as well as the locally operating federal institutions to provide the necessary capabilities to cope with the consequences of any nuclear or radiological accident. 2 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Background ........................................................................................................ 5 1.2. Scope .................................................................................................................. 6 1.3. Process ................................................................................................................ 8 1.4. Input and guidance for the assessment ............................................................. 11 1.5. Regional Table-Top and Field Radiological Emergency Exercise .................. 11 2. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ................................................................................... 12 2.1. Historical background and present situation .................................................... 12 2.1.1. Archangelsk Region ................................................................................. 12 2.1.2. City of Archangelsk .................................................................................. 13 2.1.3. City of Severodvinsk ................................................................................ 14 2.1.4. JSC "Centre of Shiprepairing "Zvezdochka" ........................................... 14 2.1.5. JSC "Research and Development Technological Bureau "Onega" .......... 15 2.1.6. JSC "Product Association "SEVMASH" ................................................. 16 2.2. Main findings ................................................................................................... 17 2.3. Interim (immediate) actions ............................................................................. 21 2.4. Long-term actions ............................................................................................ 21 3. DETAILED FINDINGS .......................................................................................... 23 3.1. Basic responsibilities ........................................................................................ 23 3.1.1. Current situation ....................................................................................... 23 3.2. Assessment of threats ....................................................................................... 25 3.2.1. Current situation ....................................................................................... 25 3.2.2. Recommendation ...................................................................................... 26 3.3. Establishing emergency management and operations; authority, organization and coordination of emergency response ...................................... 27 3.3.1. Current situation ....................................................................................... 27 3.4. Identifying, notifying and activating ................................................................ 27 3.4.1. Current situation ....................................................................................... 28 3.4.2. Recommendation ...................................................................................... 31 3.5. Taking mitigatory actions................................................................................. 31 3.5.1. Current situation ....................................................................................... 32 3.5.2. Recommendation ...................................................................................... 33 3.6. Taking urgent protective actions ...................................................................... 33 3.6.1. Current situation ....................................................................................... 33 3.6.2. Recommendation ...................................................................................... 34 3.7. Providing information, issuing warnings and instructions to the public .......... 34 3.7.1. Current situation ....................................................................................... 34 3.7.2. Recommendation ...................................................................................... 35 3.8. Protecting emergency workers ......................................................................... 35 3.8.1. Current situation ....................................................................................... 35 3.8.2. Recommendation ...................................................................................... 36 3.9. Assessing the initial phase ............................................................................... 36 3.9.1. Current situation ....................................................................................... 36 3.9.2. Recommendation ...................................................................................... 37 3.10. Managing medical response ........................................................................... 37 3 3.10.1. Current situation ..................................................................................... 37 3.10.2.Recommendation ..................................................................................... 38 3.11. Keeping the public informed .......................................................................... 38 3.11.1. Current situation ..................................................................................... 38 3.11.2. Recommendation .................................................................................... 38 3.12. Taking agricultural countermeasures against ingestion and longer term protective actions ................................................................................................ 38 3.12.1. Current situation ..................................................................................... 38 3.12.2. Recommendation .................................................................................... 39 3.13. Mitigating non-radiological consequences of the emergency and response .. 39 3.13.1. Current situation ..................................................................................... 39 3.13.2. Recommendation .................................................................................... 39 3.14. Requirements for infrastructure ..................................................................... 39 3.14.1 Current situation ...................................................................................... 40 3.14.2. Recommendation .................................................................................... 42 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................. 43 Appendix I. Mission Team Composition ................................................................ 43 Appendix II. Work Done and Persons Met ............................................................. 44 Appendix III. Terms of Reference of the IAEA Emergency Preparedness and Response Review (EPREV) Mission to Archangelsk Region (Russian Federation) .......................................................................................................... 50 Appendix IV. Comprehensive Emergency Exercise "Arctic-2011" ....................... 57 GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................ 61 ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................... 66 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................ 69 4 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. BACKGROUND The obligations, responsibilities and requirements for preparedness for and response to radiation emergencies are set out in the Safety Standards, No. GS-R-2 Requirements for ―Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency‖ [1]. The IAEA General Conference, in resolution GC(46)/RES/9, encourages Member States to ―implement the Safety Requirements for Preparedness
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Determination Report
    DETERMINATION REPORT CLIMATE CHANGE GLOBAL SERVICES (CCGS) Determination Report on JI Project “Evaporation System Modernization at OJSC “Ilim Group” Branch in Koryazhma” RUSSIAN FEDERATION BUREAU VERITAS CERTIFICATION REPORT NO. RUSSIA /0023/2009, REV . 01 Report Template Revision 4, 28/09/2007 BUREAU VERITAS CERTIFICATION Report No: RUSSIA/0023-1/2009 rev. 01 DETERMINATION REPORT Date of first issue: Organizational unit: 18/05/2009 Bureau Veritas Certification Holding SAS Client: Client ref.: CCGS Ltd. Mr. Dmitry Potashev Summary: Bureau Veritas Certification has made the determination of the project “Evapor ation System modernization at OJSC “Ilim Group” Branch in Koryazhma”, on the basis of UNFCCC criteria for the JI, as well as criteria given to provide for consistent project operations, monitoring and reporting. UNFCCC criteria refer to Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol, the JI guidelines and the subsequent decisions by the JI Supervisory Committee, as well as the host country criteria. The determination is carried out under Track 1 as per Glossary of JI terms, in line with paragraph 23 of the JI guidelines. The determination scope is defined as an independent and objective review of the project design document, the project’s baseline, monitoring plan and other relevant documents, and consists of the following three phases: i) desk review of the project design document and particularly the baseline and monitoring plan; ii) follow-up interviews with project stakeholders; iii) resolution of outstanding issues and the issuance of the final determination report and opinion. The overall determination, from Contract Review to Determination Report & Opinion, was conducted using Bureau Veritas Certification internal procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrialization of Housing Construction As a Tool for Sustainable Settlement and Rural Areas Development
    E3S Web of Conferences 164, 07010 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf /202016407010 TPACEE-2019 Industrialization of housing construction as a tool for sustainable settlement and rural areas development Olga Popova1,*, Polina Antufieva1 , Vladimir Grebenshchikov2 and Mariya Balmashnova2 1Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, 163002, Severnaya Dvina Emb., 17, Arkhangelsk, Russia 2 Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, 26, Yaroslavskoeshosse, 129337, Moscow, Russia Abstract. The development of the construction industry, conducting construction in accordance with standard projects, and transforming the construction materials industry in hard-to-reach and sparsely populated areas will make significant progress in solving the housing problem. Industrialization of housing construction is a catalyst for strong growth of the region’s economy and the quality of life of citizens. The purpose of this study is to develop a methodology for assessing the level of industrialization of the territory’s construction complex and its development potential for increasing the volume of low-rise housing stock. Research tasks: 1) assessment of the need to develop housing construction, including low-rise housing, on a particular territory; 2) development of a methodology for calculating the level of industrialization of construction in the area under consideration to determine the possibility of developing low-rise housing construction in this area in the proposed way; 3) approbation of the method using the example of rural areas of the Arkhangelsk region. It was revealed that the districts of the Arkhangelsk region have medium and low levels of industrialization. The districts that are most in need of an increase in the rate of housing construction have been identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Forest Sector in the Arkhangelsk Oblast During the Transition Period of the 1990S
    Development of forest sector in the Arkhangelsk oblast during the transition period of the 1990s ALBINA PASHKEVICH Pashkevich Albina (2003). Development of forest sector in the Arkhangelsk oblast during the transition period of the 1990s. Fennia 181: 1, pp. 13–24. Helsinki. ISSN 0015-0010. The Arkhangelsk oblast has long been one of Russia’s most important forest industrial regions. This paper analyses the changes in accessibility of forest resources and forest commodity production during the transition period in the 1990s. Special attention is given to firm restructuring, active roles of domestic capital and the different survival strategies that have been developed by in- dustries in the region. Further analysis deals with signs of economic recovery in the forest sector due to the processes of restructuring, modernisation and self-organisation. Albina Pashkevich, Spatial Modelling Centre (SMC), Department of Social and Economic Geography, Umeå University, Box 839, SE-98128 Kiruna, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected]. MS received 12 August 2002. Introduction adoption of a new. Some suggest that this proc- ess has been deeply embedded in the nature of The shift from central planning to a market-based the socialist system (Dingsdale 1999; Hamilton economy in Russia culminated with the dramatic 1999) and that the legacy of the communism has economic and political reorientation that began been only partly removed, and instead has mere- in the 1990s. This transition towards a market-ori- ly been reworked in a complex way (Smith 1997). ented and outward-looking economic system led Others say that reforms have actually ended the by private sector has created new challenges and old ‘command economy’ but have instead suc- opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Art+ Culture
    RUSSIAN ART+ CULTURE WINTER GUIDE RUSSIAN ART WEEK, LONDON 23-30 NOVEMBER 2018 Russian Art Week Guide, oktober 2018 CONTENTS Russian Sale Icons, Fine Art and Antiques AUCTION IN COPENHAGEN PREVIEW IN LONDON FRIDAY 30 NOVEMBER AT 2 PM Shapero Modern 32 St George Street London W1S 2EA 24 november: 2 pm - 6 pm 25 november: 11 am - 5 pm 26 november: 9 am - 6 pm THIS ISSUE WELCOME RUSSIAN WORKS ON PAPER By Natasha Butterwick ..................................3 1920’s-1930’s ............................................. 12 AUCTION HIGHLIGHTS FEATURED EVENTS ...........................14 By Simon Hewitt ............................................ 4 RUSSIAN TREASURES IN THE AUCTION SALES ROYAL COLLECTION Christie's, Sotheby's ........................................8 Interview with Caroline de Guitaut ............... 24 For more information please contact MacDougall's, Bonhams .................................9 Martin Hans Borg on +45 8818 1128 Bruun Rasmussen, Roseberys ........................10 RA+C RECOMMENDS .....................30 or [email protected] Stockholms Auktionsverk ................................11 PARTNERS ...............................................32 Above: Georgy Rublev, Anti-capitalist picture "Demonstration", 1932. Tempera on paper, 30 x 38 cm COPENHAGEN, DENMARK TEL +45 8818 1111 Cover: Laurits Regner Tuxen, The Marriage of Nicholas II, Emperor of Russia, 26th November 1894, 1896 BRUUN-RASMUSSEN.COM Credit: Royal Collection Trust/ © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2018 russian art week guide_1018_150x180_engelsk.indd 1 11/10/2018 14.02 INTRODUCTION WELCOME Russian Art Week, yet again, strong collection of 19th century Russian provides the necessary Art featuring first-class work by Makovsky cultural bridge between and Pokhitonov, whilst MacDougall's, who Russia and the West at a time continue to provide our organisation with of even worsening relations fantastic support, have a large array of between the two.
    [Show full text]
  • From Wild Forest Reindeer to Biodiversity Studies and Environmental Education” 5Th to 6Th October, 2010 in Kuhmo, Eastern Finland
    YMPÄRISTÖN- SUOJELU The Finnish-Russian Friendship Nature Reserve was established in 1990 to promote and en- hance cooperation in nature conservation and conservation research. In the beginning, the main From wild forest reindeer to biodiversity emphasis was on joint research between Finland and the Soviet Union. Over the years, the co- studies and environmental education operation has expanded to include many universities and research institutes worldwide. The year 2010 marked the 20-year anniversary of the Friendship Nature Reserve. To celebrate this important year, the Finnish Environment Institute, Metsähallitus Natural Heritage Services Abstracts of the 20 years anniversary symposium of and the Kostomuksha Strict Nature Reserve (Zapovednik) arranged jointly an Anniversary Sym- the Finnish - Russian Nature Reserve Friendship posium “From Wild Forest Reindeer to Biodiversity Studies and Environmental Education” 5th to 6th October, 2010 in Kuhmo, eastern Finland. Parallel to the symposium, the 4th European Green Belt Conference was arranged in Kuhmo by Metsähallitus Natural Heritage Services. Around Outi Isokääntä and Jari Heikkilä (eds.) 150 people from 19 different countries participated the symposium. ISBN 978-952-11-3845-4 (PDF) Suomen ympäristökeskus From wild forest reindeer to biodiversity studies and environmental education Abstracts of the 20 years anniversary symposium of the Finnish - Russian Nature Reserve Friendship Outi Isokääntä and Jari Heikkilä (eds.) Helsinki 2011 FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE Layout: Pirjo Appelgrén Cover photo: Ari Meriruoko The publication is availble only in the internet www.environment.fi/syke/fnr20 ISBN 978-952-11-3845-4 (PDF) FOREWORD Jari Heikkilä Finnish Environment Institute Friendship Park Research Centre [email protected] Over the past 20 years the Finnish-Russian Friendship Nature Reserve has been in- volved in opening the border between the East and the West for nature conservation and research.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Update on the Russian Pulp and Paper Markets Prof
    Short update on the Russian Pulp and Paper markets Prof. Eduard Akim Saint Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies and Design (SPb SU ITD). FOREST PRODUCTS TRENDS & DEVELOPMENTS 5 November 2019 15:00 – 18:00 Room XII, Palais des Nations, Geneva Output of market pulp, paper and paperboard in the Russian Federation in 2017-2018 (thousand metric tons) Sources: Goscomstat of the Russian Federation; RAO Bumprom, *author's data handling Products 2018 2017 2018/2017, % Total Market Pulp, Paper & Paperboard 11872* 11232* 105.7 Market pulp total 2815* 2733* 103.0 Paper & Paperboard total 9058 8569 105.7 Newsprint Paper 1527 1440 106.1 Russian exports and imports of pulp, paper and paperboard in 2000-2018 (Million USD) 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 Exports 1000 Imports Trade balance 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 -1000 -2000 -3000 -4000 State of the industry & export • In 2018 pulp production increased by 3.0%, cardboard and paper - by 5.7%. The production volume of pulp and paper industry in 2018 amounted to 11.872 million tons. Pulp exports exceeded 2.1 million tons, which is 108% of the 2017 level. In terms of value - for 1.506 billion dollars (137.2% of the level of 2017). • In 2011-2018, exports of pulp and paper products continued to increase. Russian exports as a percentage of production have remained almost unchanged since 1996, while exports account for about 80% of the production for market pulp and about 30-35% for paper and cardboard.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Evaluation of Preservation and Growth of Spruce Climatypes Based on Long-Term Provenance Trials in Russia
    Folia Forestalia Polonica, series A, 2014, Vol. 56 (1), 56–67 REVIEW ARTICLE DOI: 10.2478/ffp-2014-0006 Comparative evaluation of preservation and growth of spruce climatypes based on long-term provenance trials in Russia Marina A. Nikolaeva1 , Danial Kh. Faizulin2, Alexander Ph. Potokin1, Oleg A. Jamaleev3 1 Saint-Petersburg State Forest Technical University named after S.M. Kirov, Institutsky per. 5, 194021, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, e-mail: [email protected] 2 North Forestry Research Institute, St. Nikitova 13, 163062, Arkhangelsk, Russia 3 Branch of the Federal State Institution, Russian Centre of Forest Health, Leningrad Centre of Forest Health, Institutsky pr. 21, 194021, Saint-Petersburg, Russia AbstrAct The article presents the results of provenance trials carried on the Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.), the Sibe- rian spruce (Picea obovata Ledeb.) and hybrid forms of these two species. The trails were laid in 1977–1978 accord- ing to wide-scale All-Union program of 1972 year (Prokazin 1972) in the Arkhangelsk, Vologda, Leningrad regions and the Republic of Bashkortostan. The results of the most recent inventory of provenance trials as well as analyses of preservation and growth of spruce progenies with different geographical origin are presented. One of the main factors affecting spruce progeny survival was north-south distance between seed collection lo- cality and test locality. At the time of the study (2010–2012), in the Vologda and Arkhangelsk regions, spruce progeny preservation was higher in the case of mother stands distant to the north. On the contrary, in the Leningrad region and the Republic of Bashkortostan, preservation of northern climatypes’ progenies was lower during the whole period of plantations’ growth.
    [Show full text]
  • The SIS Limits and Related Proglacial Events in the Severnaya Dvina Basin, Northwestern Russia: Review and New Data
    Bulletin of the Geological Society of Finland, Vol. 90, 2018, pp 301–313, https://doi.org/10.17741/bgsf/90.2.012 The SIS limits and related proglacial events in the Severnaya Dvina basin, northwestern Russia: review and new data Nataliya E. Zaretskaya1*, Andrei V. Panin2,3 and Natalia V. Karpukhina2 1 Geological Institute of RAS, Pyzhesky per. 7, Moscow, 119017, RUSSIA 2 Institute of Geography of RAS, Staromonetny per. 29, Moscow, 119017, RUSSIA 3 Lomonsov Moscow State University, Vorobiovy Gory 1, Moscow, 119991, RUSSIA Abstract Two underlying problems of the Late Quaternary history of the Scandinavian Ice Sheet (SIS) are reviewed in the paper: the position of the southeastern SIS boundary at the Late Glacial Maximum (LGM), which is still widely “migrating” depending on authors’ concepts, and the formation of associated proglacial lakes (i.e. their dimensions, drainage and chronology) in the valleys of Severnaya Dvina River basin. The position of maximum ice limit in the northwest of the Russian Plain remains debatable and is the least reliable compared to the other SIS sectors. Most of the recent reconstructions concerning ice-dammed lakes (water overflows, restructuring of river valleys etc.) exploited the geological survey results of mid-20th century: since then no geological studies have been conducted of the proposed spillways, their filling sediments and age using the modern sedimentological and geochronological techniques. As a result, the majority of the above-mentioned reconstructions have to be considered hypothetical. Here we present new results on two valley sites that allow to suggest that: 1) the SIS did not advance through the lower and middle Vychegda valley at LGM as suggested in some recent publications; 2) the LGM glacier-dammed lake had a very limited extension in the Severnaya Dvina valley and did not exceed to the Vychegda River mouth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kotlas– Waterville Area Sister City Connection
    About Kotlas The Kotlas– Waterville Area Sister City Connection Incorporated in 1917, Kotlas (61° 15´ N, 46° 35´ E) is a city of 82,000 people at the southern tip of the Archangel Region, a province in north-western Russia. Kotlas lies at the confluence of two wide, navigable rivers, the Northern Dvina and the Vychegda. The city has a river port, a shipyard, a rail junction, an airport, a timber-processing combine, a clothing and furniture factory, a brick factory, and an electromechanical factory. A nearby town has a paper mill complex, the largest in all of the former Soviet Union. These similarities to the Waterville area—the northern location, the rivers, the railroad, and the prominence of paper and wood products industries—led organizers in Waterville to choose Kotlas as the target of their sister city aspirations. The Kotlas-Waterville Area Sister City Connection P.O. Box 1747 Waterville, ME 04903-1747 Greater Waterville’s www.kotlas.org Russian Sister City Organization Front panel: sketch by Yuri Chirkov 12/06 About the Kotlas Connection • Sponsored a two-way student exchange on the theme of two rivers, the Kennebec and The Kotlas-Waterville Area Sister City the Northern Dvina Connection strives to develop friendship and • Sponsored, with the Open World Program, understanding between the peoples of Central an economic-themed visit led by the mayor Maine and Kotlas, Russia. (See the back panel of Kotlas for more information about Kotlas.) To that • Sponsored, with the assistance of the Mailings Calling Telephone end, the Kotlas Connection sponsors educa- local hospitals, Rotary, and the American tional and cultural programs in the Waterville Legion, a medical delegation from Kotlas area to raise awareness of Russia and Kotlas.
    [Show full text]
  • Struggle for the Ownership of Pulp and Paper Mills
    Anna-Maija Matilainen (in The Changing Governance of Renewable Natural Resources in Northwest Russia, ed. by S. Nysten-Haarala, p. 105-128) Struggle for the Ownership of Pulp and Paper Mills Introduction The present paper deals with the pulp and paper industry in Northwest Russia and changing ownership patterns. During recent years the pulp and paper industry in Russia has undergone heavy restructuring and consolidation. Some pulp and paper producers have started to build holding companies in order to strengthen their position on the markets. Large foreign forest enterprises have found the opportunities of Russia’s forest sector as well and many of them have made a significant entry into Russia. Furthermore, the pulp and paper industry has attracted the interest of Russian oligarchs. Their more active role on the Russian pulp and paper business has evoked a great deal of confusion. Since the beginning of 2000s enterprise takeover wave has shaken up the pulp and paper industry in Russia. Russian forest enterprises are concentrating into larger units and more powerful enterprises are emerging into the Russian forest sector. Large and relatively lucrative pulp and paper mills have been the main targets of takeover attempts.1 Accordingly, the hostile takeover attempts have had a great influence on the whole forest industrial sector in Russia. Furthermore, the long-lasting and complicated takeover battles have generated harsh criticism and lively debate over possibilities to regulate enterprise takeovers. In this article I review the actors in the pulp and paper industry in Northwest Russia and some prominent ownership disputes around the pulp and paper mills.
    [Show full text]
  • Материалы Совещания Рабочей Группы INQUA Peribaltic
    САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ Материалы совещания рабочей группы INQUA Peribaltic Из сборника материалов совместной международной конференции «ГЕОМОРФОЛОГИЯ И ПАЛЕОГЕОГРАФИЯ ПОЛЯРНЫХ РЕГИОНОВ», симпозиума «Леопольдина» и совещания рабочей группы INQUA Peribaltic, Санкт-Петербург, СПбГУ, 9 – 17 сентября 2012 года Санкт-Петербург, 2012 SAINT-PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY Proceedings of the INQUA Peribaltic Working Group Workshop From the book of proceeding of the Joint International Conference “GEOMORPHOLOGY AND PALАEOGEOGRAPHY OF POLAR REGIONS”, Leopoldina Symposium and INQUA Peribaltic Working Group Workshop, Saint-Petersburg, SPbSU, 9-17 September, 2012 Saint-Petersburg, 2012 УДК 551.4 Ответственные редакторы: А.И. Жиров, В.Ю. Кузнецов, Д.А. Субетто, Й. Тиде Техническое редактирование и компьютерная верстка: А.А. Старикова, В.В. Ситало Обложка: К.А. Смыкова «ГЕОМОРФОЛОГИЯ И ПАЛЕОГЕОГРАФИЯ ПОЛЯРНЫХ РЕГИОНОВ»: Материалы совместной международной конференции «ГЕОМОРФОЛОГИЯ И ПАЛЕОГЕОГРАФИЯ ПОЛЯРНЫХ РЕГИОНОВ», симпозиума «Леопольдина» и совещания рабочей группы INQUA Peribaltic. Санкт-Петербург, СПбГУ, 9 – 17 сентября 2012 года / Отв. ред. А.И. Жиров, В.Ю. Кузнецов, Д.А. Субетто, Й. Тиде. – СПб., 2012. – 475 с. ISBN 978-5-4391-0029-3 Сборник содержит материалы совместной международной конференции "Геоморфологические и палеогеографические исследования полярных регионов", симпозиума «Леопольдина» и совещания рабочей группы INQUA Peribaltic. Обсуждается целый ряд актуальных вопросов, связанных с изучением проблем теоретической
    [Show full text]
  • The State Hermitage Museum Annual Report 2012
    THE STATE HERMITAGE MUSEUM ANNUAL REPORT n 2012 CONTENTS General Editor 4 Year of Village and Garden Mikhail Piotrovsky, General Director of the State Hermitage Museum, 6 State Hermitage Museum. General Information Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 16 Awards Full Member of the Russian Academy of Arts, Professor of St. Petersburg State University, 20 Composition of the Hermitage Collection as of 1 January 2013 Doctor of History 40 Exhibitions 86 Restoration and Conservation 121 Publications EDITORIAL BOARD: 135 Electronic Editions and Video Films Mikhail Piotrovsky, 136 Conferences General Director of the State Hermitage Museum 141 Dissertations Georgy Vilinbakhov, 142 Archaeological Expeditions Deputy Director for Research 158 Major Construction and Restoration of the Buildings Svetlana Adaksina, Deputy Director, Chief Curator 170 Structure of Visits to the State Hermitage in 2012 Marina Antipova, 171 Educational Events Deputy Director for Finance and Planning 180 Special Development Programmes Alexey Bogdanov, Deputy Director for Maintenance 188 International Advisory Board of the State Hermitage Museum Vladimir Matveyev, 190 Guests of the Hermitage Deputy Director for Exhibitions and Development 194 Hermitage Friends Organisations Mikhail Novikov, 204 Hermitage Friends’ Club Deputy Director for Construction 206 Financial Statements of the State Hermitage Museum Mariam Dandamayeva, Academic Secretary 208 Principal Patrons and Sponsors of the State Hermitage Museum in 2012 Yelena Zvyagintseva, 210 Staff Members of
    [Show full text]