Development of Tourism in the Arkhangelsk Area This Article Is Devoted to the Development and Functioning of the Regional Tourism Industry

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Development of Tourism in the Arkhangelsk Area This Article Is Devoted to the Development and Functioning of the Regional Tourism Industry REGIONAL ECONOMY • The issue theme: TOURISM UDC 338.48(470.11) © V.E. Toskunina © N.N. Shpanova Development of tourism in the Arkhangelsk area This article is devoted to the development and functioning of the regional tourism industry. The main problem of inbound and domestic tourism, the tourism infrastructure state, supply and demand in the tourist market of the Arkhangelsk region are considered in the article. The assessment of historical and cultural factors in the development of regional tourism and regional promotion of tourist products is also given in the article. The tourism branch, regional tourism. Vera E. TOSKUNINA Doctor of Economics, Head of division, Arkhangelsk Scientific Center of the Ural RAS department Natalia N. SHPANOVA Chief searching authority of the Committee on Culture of the Arkhangelsk Region Modern tourism is actively growing sector become comfortable, interesting attracted not of many economies of the world. Despite its only Russians, but also flows of tourists from high tourist potential, Russia is far from ad- other countries. vanced positions on the global tourism market, Available in the Arkhangelsk region of creating mostly visiting flows. As a percentage unique natural complexes and picturesque of gross national product of tourism is less than landscapes with a rich and endemic flora one percent. The main constraint to the devel- and fauna, historical monuments and archi- opment of both domestic and inbound tourism tecture, as well as the culture heritage of the remained steady appreciation the value of travel Russian North can become the basis for the packages. The ratio of price and quality, and development of tourism industry region. But, variety of overseas tourism services induced in spite of the existing tourism potential, favo- many Russians, to the choice of foreign travel. rable geographical and political situation, the At the same time, the price of a week-long tour Arkhangelsk region occupies a very modest of Russia for foreign tourists has grown by an place in the tourist market. The main directions average of almost three times compared with of tourism flows – the Solovki, Arkhangelsk, 2001. There is an urgent need, finally, solve the Severodvinsk, Onega, Kargopol, Kenozero and basic problems of incoming and domestic tour- Pinezha. But while half the incoming flow is in ism. For leisure and travel in our country have Arkhangelsk. 52 1 (5) 2009 Economical and social changes: facts, trends, forecast REGIONAL ECONOMY • The issue theme: TOURISM V.E. Toskunina, N.N. Shpanova There are near 60 companies working on One of the traditional holiday in Russia the tourist market of Arkhangelsk region to- has been and remains a health resort. In many day,6 of them are tour operators, others are regions, just medical institutions based on the engaged in travel agency activities. In recent curative properties of natural therapeutic fac- years, the number of travel companies in the tors become holiday place for a considerable Arkhangelsk region greatly increased (fig. 1). part of tourists. In the Arkhangelsk region for This reduces the number of tour operators many years, there are 7 sanatorium (includ- and a growing number of travel agencies. The ing guest houses with medical treatment), 11 number of workers in this area does not exceed sanatorium-preventorium (up to 2007 – 13) 250 people, including workers and employees and a holiday center, in general, calculated to of an unscheduled. And although for the pe- 2,5 thousand places, and 9 recreation center riod nearly doubled the number of tickets sold on the 730 seats. populations, but it happened due to increase in Designed and implemented social and eco- sales of tours to foreign countries (fig. 2). The nomic program «Development of tourism in total cost of the public tourist tours in 2007 the Arkhangelsk Region (2007 – 2009 years)»1, amounted to 570 million rubles. tourist complex, providing ample opportu- Figure 1. The number of travel companies in the Arkhangelsk region, including those which are engaged in travel agency activities 70 60 60 53 48 50 43 41 34 40 29 30 18 20 10 0 2004 г. 2005 г. 2006 г. 2007 г. Number of firms Tourist agency activity Figure 2. Quantity of sold tourist vouchers 25000 20782 20000 18331 14404 13202 15000 11150 9791 8540 10000 7773 7745 6659 7580 5000 3377 0 2004 г. 2005 г. 2006 г. 2007 г. Total In Russia In foreign countries Economical and social changes: facts, trends, forecast 1 (5) 2009 53 Development of tourism in the Arkhangelsk area nity to meet the needs of Russian and foreign development of tourism infrastructure; citizens in a variety of tourism, promoting the web-site maintenance. conservation and efficient use of tourist and Expected outcomes of the Program: recreational resources. Program includes: • creating the conditions for a modern and improving information security manage- competitive tourist market, the conservation ment system of tourist-recreation complex; and efficient use of tourist and recreational formation of the modern marketing strat- potential of the region; egies to support and promote regional tourist • development of tourism as an industry products in the domestic and international specialization, have a stimulating effect on the markets; economy of the region and improving the qual- improvements in the management of ity of life; development of tourist-recreation complex and • broadening the tax base through the entry structure of the tourism market of the region; of new tourist facilities and accommodation, creation of new tourism network; creating more jobs, increase tax revenues from encourage the development of tourism in- tourism in the budgets of all levels; frastructure by attracting domestic and foreign • promote the development adjacent to the investment for reconstruction of the existing sphere of tourism industries. material and technical basis, creation of new Although the program states that "major tourist facilities and accommodation; constraints of development of tourism in the staffing industry, improving the quality of Arkhangelsk region is the lack of public support services in the tourism and hospitality. for the development of the sector budget alloca- Among the main activities of the Program: tions" (Section 1 "Contents of the problem and information support the tourism indus- rationale for its decision software techniques"), try; the structure of financing of the Program does promoting tourism in the municipalities not reflect the declared financial sentiments of the region; (fig. 3). development human resource capacity The total amount of funding for the Pro- of the tourism industry; gram is 366 370 thousand rubles, including: the Figure 3. The structure of financing of the Program "Development of tourism in the Arkhangelsk Region (2007 – 2009 years)",% 1,90% 96,90% 1,20% Regional budget Local budgets Extra-budgetary sources 54 1 (5) 2009 Economical and social changes: facts, trends, forecast REGIONAL ECONOMY • The issue theme: TOURISM V.E. Toskunina, N.N. Shpanova regional budget – 7 000 thousand rub.; Funds Solovky. By sea you can get to the Solovki only from local budgets – 4 320 thousand rubles; through Karelia. In Arkhangelsk, as already Extra-budgetary sources – 355 050 thousand noted, there are good hotels to accommodate rubles. visitors to the city, but modern tourist class On the question of financing: The Gov- hotels need for the development of the tour- ernment of the Vologda region has adopted a ism industry. All this requires considerable re- long-term targeted program "Veliky Ustyug – sources. Consequently, if we want to make this the birthplace of Father Frost" in 2009 – 2010, industry one of the main strategic directions of which allocated about 90 million rubles infra- the socio-economic development of the region, structure development fiefdom of Father Frost you must create an enabling environment for in the Veliky Ustyug Municipal District. At the investment in it. same time from the district budget in two years To ensure that tourism has become one of is planned to allocate almost 11 million rubles, the leading industries of region’s specialization, from the budget of the Vologda region – more should make great efforts, including organi- than 78 million rubles. The funds will be spent zational, promotional and financial. But only on design and construction of infrastructure advertisement is not enough. facilities at the fiefdom of Father Frost in the Industry’s operating schedule is not directed town of Veliky Ustyug, as well as the various at optimizing the work with the client and does activities under the project. not take into account the specifics of the travel In recent years, some positive developments business, and politics increasing price leads to in the formation of regional infrastructure of a reorientation of the tourist flow to other re- the tourism industry have been in the Arkhan- gions. During holidays the service is trying to gelsk region. There are good hotels to accom- arrange a weekend, on the eve of New Year holi- modate visitors of the city, a lot of food service days, many trains are canceled, the museums companies of high-level in Arkhangelsk. There are closed. Observed that in countries where are some positive changes in the field of tourism tourist industry actively grows the majority of areas of the region. travel agencies are dealing with internal and Opened timber hotel «Golubino» provides entrance tourism, we have the same picture of a range of tourist services. Pinega develops, the the reverse: the majority of travel agencies send guest house with rooms of high class was opened tourists abroad. there. Recently, the programs of the museum of It is necessary to the formation and promo- wooden architecture "Malye Korely" are very tion of tourist products. The analysis shows different, tourists go there with pleasure. The that in Russia there are tourist offices of dif- ski tourism is developed in Onega. ferent countries, they cooperate closely with In general, the tourism infrastructure in the the national tourism business, to promote its region developed very poorly and does not fully tourist products, organizing familiarization conform to the revitalization and tourism de- tours.
Recommended publications
  • Industrialization of Housing Construction As a Tool for Sustainable Settlement and Rural Areas Development
    E3S Web of Conferences 164, 07010 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf /202016407010 TPACEE-2019 Industrialization of housing construction as a tool for sustainable settlement and rural areas development Olga Popova1,*, Polina Antufieva1 , Vladimir Grebenshchikov2 and Mariya Balmashnova2 1Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, 163002, Severnaya Dvina Emb., 17, Arkhangelsk, Russia 2 Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, 26, Yaroslavskoeshosse, 129337, Moscow, Russia Abstract. The development of the construction industry, conducting construction in accordance with standard projects, and transforming the construction materials industry in hard-to-reach and sparsely populated areas will make significant progress in solving the housing problem. Industrialization of housing construction is a catalyst for strong growth of the region’s economy and the quality of life of citizens. The purpose of this study is to develop a methodology for assessing the level of industrialization of the territory’s construction complex and its development potential for increasing the volume of low-rise housing stock. Research tasks: 1) assessment of the need to develop housing construction, including low-rise housing, on a particular territory; 2) development of a methodology for calculating the level of industrialization of construction in the area under consideration to determine the possibility of developing low-rise housing construction in this area in the proposed way; 3) approbation of the method using the example of rural areas of the Arkhangelsk region. It was revealed that the districts of the Arkhangelsk region have medium and low levels of industrialization. The districts that are most in need of an increase in the rate of housing construction have been identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Forest Sector in the Arkhangelsk Oblast During the Transition Period of the 1990S
    Development of forest sector in the Arkhangelsk oblast during the transition period of the 1990s ALBINA PASHKEVICH Pashkevich Albina (2003). Development of forest sector in the Arkhangelsk oblast during the transition period of the 1990s. Fennia 181: 1, pp. 13–24. Helsinki. ISSN 0015-0010. The Arkhangelsk oblast has long been one of Russia’s most important forest industrial regions. This paper analyses the changes in accessibility of forest resources and forest commodity production during the transition period in the 1990s. Special attention is given to firm restructuring, active roles of domestic capital and the different survival strategies that have been developed by in- dustries in the region. Further analysis deals with signs of economic recovery in the forest sector due to the processes of restructuring, modernisation and self-organisation. Albina Pashkevich, Spatial Modelling Centre (SMC), Department of Social and Economic Geography, Umeå University, Box 839, SE-98128 Kiruna, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected]. MS received 12 August 2002. Introduction adoption of a new. Some suggest that this proc- ess has been deeply embedded in the nature of The shift from central planning to a market-based the socialist system (Dingsdale 1999; Hamilton economy in Russia culminated with the dramatic 1999) and that the legacy of the communism has economic and political reorientation that began been only partly removed, and instead has mere- in the 1990s. This transition towards a market-ori- ly been reworked in a complex way (Smith 1997). ented and outward-looking economic system led Others say that reforms have actually ended the by private sector has created new challenges and old ‘command economy’ but have instead suc- opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Art+ Culture
    RUSSIAN ART+ CULTURE WINTER GUIDE RUSSIAN ART WEEK, LONDON 23-30 NOVEMBER 2018 Russian Art Week Guide, oktober 2018 CONTENTS Russian Sale Icons, Fine Art and Antiques AUCTION IN COPENHAGEN PREVIEW IN LONDON FRIDAY 30 NOVEMBER AT 2 PM Shapero Modern 32 St George Street London W1S 2EA 24 november: 2 pm - 6 pm 25 november: 11 am - 5 pm 26 november: 9 am - 6 pm THIS ISSUE WELCOME RUSSIAN WORKS ON PAPER By Natasha Butterwick ..................................3 1920’s-1930’s ............................................. 12 AUCTION HIGHLIGHTS FEATURED EVENTS ...........................14 By Simon Hewitt ............................................ 4 RUSSIAN TREASURES IN THE AUCTION SALES ROYAL COLLECTION Christie's, Sotheby's ........................................8 Interview with Caroline de Guitaut ............... 24 For more information please contact MacDougall's, Bonhams .................................9 Martin Hans Borg on +45 8818 1128 Bruun Rasmussen, Roseberys ........................10 RA+C RECOMMENDS .....................30 or [email protected] Stockholms Auktionsverk ................................11 PARTNERS ...............................................32 Above: Georgy Rublev, Anti-capitalist picture "Demonstration", 1932. Tempera on paper, 30 x 38 cm COPENHAGEN, DENMARK TEL +45 8818 1111 Cover: Laurits Regner Tuxen, The Marriage of Nicholas II, Emperor of Russia, 26th November 1894, 1896 BRUUN-RASMUSSEN.COM Credit: Royal Collection Trust/ © Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 2018 russian art week guide_1018_150x180_engelsk.indd 1 11/10/2018 14.02 INTRODUCTION WELCOME Russian Art Week, yet again, strong collection of 19th century Russian provides the necessary Art featuring first-class work by Makovsky cultural bridge between and Pokhitonov, whilst MacDougall's, who Russia and the West at a time continue to provide our organisation with of even worsening relations fantastic support, have a large array of between the two.
    [Show full text]
  • From Wild Forest Reindeer to Biodiversity Studies and Environmental Education” 5Th to 6Th October, 2010 in Kuhmo, Eastern Finland
    YMPÄRISTÖN- SUOJELU The Finnish-Russian Friendship Nature Reserve was established in 1990 to promote and en- hance cooperation in nature conservation and conservation research. In the beginning, the main From wild forest reindeer to biodiversity emphasis was on joint research between Finland and the Soviet Union. Over the years, the co- studies and environmental education operation has expanded to include many universities and research institutes worldwide. The year 2010 marked the 20-year anniversary of the Friendship Nature Reserve. To celebrate this important year, the Finnish Environment Institute, Metsähallitus Natural Heritage Services Abstracts of the 20 years anniversary symposium of and the Kostomuksha Strict Nature Reserve (Zapovednik) arranged jointly an Anniversary Sym- the Finnish - Russian Nature Reserve Friendship posium “From Wild Forest Reindeer to Biodiversity Studies and Environmental Education” 5th to 6th October, 2010 in Kuhmo, eastern Finland. Parallel to the symposium, the 4th European Green Belt Conference was arranged in Kuhmo by Metsähallitus Natural Heritage Services. Around Outi Isokääntä and Jari Heikkilä (eds.) 150 people from 19 different countries participated the symposium. ISBN 978-952-11-3845-4 (PDF) Suomen ympäristökeskus From wild forest reindeer to biodiversity studies and environmental education Abstracts of the 20 years anniversary symposium of the Finnish - Russian Nature Reserve Friendship Outi Isokääntä and Jari Heikkilä (eds.) Helsinki 2011 FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE Layout: Pirjo Appelgrén Cover photo: Ari Meriruoko The publication is availble only in the internet www.environment.fi/syke/fnr20 ISBN 978-952-11-3845-4 (PDF) FOREWORD Jari Heikkilä Finnish Environment Institute Friendship Park Research Centre [email protected] Over the past 20 years the Finnish-Russian Friendship Nature Reserve has been in- volved in opening the border between the East and the West for nature conservation and research.
    [Show full text]
  • The Population of the Pomor Part of the Turchasovsky Camp of the Kargopolsky District at the Beginning of the Xviii Century
    Вестник Томского государственного университета. История. 2016. № 3 (41) УДК. 94(47).046 DOI 10.17223/19988613/41/2 А.И. Побежимов НАСЕЛЕНИЕ ПОМОРСКОЙ ЧАСТИ ТУРЧАСОВСКОГО СТАНА КАРГОПОЛЬСКОГО УЕЗДА В НАЧАЛЕ XVIII в. Территория поморской части Турчасовского стана Каргопольского узда (Онежское Поморье) к началу XVIII в. располагалась по берегам Онежской губы, на юго-западе – Поморском, от р. Куша до Онеги и на северо-востоке – Онежском берегах, от мы- са Ухт-Наволок на севере до Онеги. Исследуются занятия, социальная структура, численность, населённость дворов, брачные связи, определяется уровень миграций населения, их причины и направления. Автор приходит к выводу, что к этому времени социально-экономическое положение населения ухудшилось, что привело к увеличению малоимущих слоёв, росту миграций и значительному сокращению населения Онежского Поморья. Ключевые слова: уезд; стан; волость; вотчина; бобыли; подсоседники; подворники; миграции. Вопросы истории населения поморской части Тур- промысел» отдавался крестьянам монастыря «в обро- часовского стана Каргопольского узда неоднократно ки погодно» [Там же. Л. 467–471]. затрагивались в отечественной историографии Рыбный промысел вёлся на реках и море. Рыбу ло- (А.А. Савич, Ю.С. Васильев, Т.А. Бернштам, вили с помощью забора, или «запора». Забор – устрой- В.И. Иванов) [1. С. 1–280; 2. С. 39–46; 3. С. 476; 4. ство для ловли сёмги, которым перегораживалась вся С. 1–608]. В этой связи стоит выделить труд река, в виде ломаной линии [6. С. 46]. В переписной Т.А. Бернштам «Поморы», посвящённый изучению книге Каргопольского уезда 1712 г. говорится о запо- этногенеза поморов. В работе автор прослеживает рах в Кушерецкой волости «на реке», в Лямецкой воло- процесс формирования населения берегов Поморья на сти вотчины Соловецкого монастыря запоры на кумжу протяжении всей его истории.
    [Show full text]
  • RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1
    RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1 No. 33 Summer 2003 Special issue: The Transformation of Protected Areas in Russia A Ten-Year Review PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (Letter from the Editors)......................................1 Ten Years of Teaching and Learning in Bolshaya Kokshaga Zapovednik ...............................................................24 BY WAY OF AN INTRODUCTION The Formation of Regional Associations A Brief History of Modern Russian Nature Reserves..........................2 of Protected Areas........................................................................................................27 A Glossary of Russian Protected Areas...........................................................3 The Growth of Regional Nature Protection: A Case Study from the Orlovskaya Oblast ..............................................29 THE PAST TEN YEARS: Making Friends beyond Boundaries.............................................................30 TRENDS AND CASE STUDIES A Spotlight on Kerzhensky Zapovednik...................................................32 Geographic Development ........................................................................................5 Ecotourism in Protected Areas: Problems and Possibilities......34 Legal Developments in Nature Protection.................................................7 A LOOK TO THE FUTURE Financing Zapovedniks ...........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Transition in the Arkhangelsk Forest Sector
    International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis • A-2361 Laxenburg • Austria Tel: +43 2236 807 • Fax: +43 2236 71313 • E-mail: [email protected] • Web: www.iiasa.ac.at INTERIM REPORT IR-99-xxx/May Institutions and the Emergence of Markets - Transition in the Arkhangelsk Forest Sector Lars Carlsson ([email protected]) Nils-Gustav Lundgren ([email protected]) Mats-Olov Oisson ([email protected]) Mikhail Yu. Varakin ([email protected]) Approved by Sten Nilsson ([email protected]) Leader, Forest Resources Project Interim Reports on work of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis receive only limited review. Views or opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the Institute, its National Member Organizations, or other organizations supporting the work. Foreword With this report on the forest sector institutions in Arkhangelsk Oblast the second study in a series of case studies that IIASA has initiated in different regions of the Russian Federation is completed. The first study was conducted in Tomsk Oblast. That study was reported in Carlsson & Olsson, eds. 1998; Carlsson & Olsson, 1998; Carlsson, Lundgren & Olsson, 1999. Studies are currently being conducted in the Karelian Re- public as well as in the regions of Moscow, Murmansk, Krasnoyarsk, Irkutsk, and Kha- barovsk. All these studies deal with institutional aspects of the Russian forest sector. The research has been made possible through financial support from The Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research (FRN) and the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (KVA). A large number of people have provided valuable infor- mation and given useful comments on earlier drafts of the report.
    [Show full text]
  • 416 Entries in the Barents Encyclopedia (In Alphabetical Order)
    416 entries in the Barents Encyclopedia (in alphabetical order) As of May 7, 2012 Letters in the leftmost column C mean: S = submitted articles (348) C = articles for which we have contracted authors (68) The entry was found in another encyclopedia / Topic New entry cate- suggested by gory Length C Entry Word [Name] 1-12 of entry Author/-s S Alta V. Tevlina 1 S Nielsen, Jens Petter [email protected] S Alta controversy Saami 3 M Berg, Bård A, [email protected] J. Porsanger S Alymov, Vasilii Kondratevich V.-P. Lehtola 2 S Martyushova, Svetlana, ([email protected]) and Ilicheva, Maria, [email protected] S Alyosha M. Ilicheva 7 S Karelin, Vladimir [email protected] [email protected] S Amundsen, Roald V. Tevlina 2 M Berg, Roald, Stavanger Univ. [email protected] S Andreyev Bay U. Wråkberg 1 S Fiskebeck, Per-Einar Per- [email protected] S Anikiev Island A.N. Davydov 6 S Davydov, Alexander. [email protected] Pomor S Apatity U. Wråkberg 1 S Dyuzhilov, Sergey, [email protected] C Arctic co-operation 8 M Hoel, Alf Håkon [email protected] and Heininen, Lassi [email protected] S Arctic Council M.-O. Olsson 8 S Vaaja, Nina Buvang, [email protected] S Arctic explorations L.-E. Edlund 3 L Wråkberg, Urban, Barents Intsitute, [email protected] S Arctic hunting (previously V. Tevlina 6 M Nielsen, Jens Petter called “Russian and Norwegian [email protected] sea mammal hunting in the Arctic”) S Arctic Ocean, The U.
    [Show full text]
  • The State Hermitage Museum Annual Report 2012
    THE STATE HERMITAGE MUSEUM ANNUAL REPORT n 2012 CONTENTS General Editor 4 Year of Village and Garden Mikhail Piotrovsky, General Director of the State Hermitage Museum, 6 State Hermitage Museum. General Information Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 16 Awards Full Member of the Russian Academy of Arts, Professor of St. Petersburg State University, 20 Composition of the Hermitage Collection as of 1 January 2013 Doctor of History 40 Exhibitions 86 Restoration and Conservation 121 Publications EDITORIAL BOARD: 135 Electronic Editions and Video Films Mikhail Piotrovsky, 136 Conferences General Director of the State Hermitage Museum 141 Dissertations Georgy Vilinbakhov, 142 Archaeological Expeditions Deputy Director for Research 158 Major Construction and Restoration of the Buildings Svetlana Adaksina, Deputy Director, Chief Curator 170 Structure of Visits to the State Hermitage in 2012 Marina Antipova, 171 Educational Events Deputy Director for Finance and Planning 180 Special Development Programmes Alexey Bogdanov, Deputy Director for Maintenance 188 International Advisory Board of the State Hermitage Museum Vladimir Matveyev, 190 Guests of the Hermitage Deputy Director for Exhibitions and Development 194 Hermitage Friends Organisations Mikhail Novikov, 204 Hermitage Friends’ Club Deputy Director for Construction 206 Financial Statements of the State Hermitage Museum Mariam Dandamayeva, Academic Secretary 208 Principal Patrons and Sponsors of the State Hermitage Museum in 2012 Yelena Zvyagintseva, 210 Staff Members of
    [Show full text]
  • Subject of the Russian Federation)
    How to use the Atlas The Atlas has two map sections The Main Section shows the location of Russia’s intact forest landscapes. The Thematic Section shows their tree species composition in two different ways. The legend is placed at the beginning of each set of maps. If you are looking for an area near a town or village Go to the Index on page 153 and find the alphabetical list of settlements by English name. The Cyrillic name is also given along with the map page number and coordinates (latitude and longitude) where it can be found. Capitals of regions and districts (raiony) are listed along with many other settlements, but only in the vicinity of intact forest landscapes. The reader should not expect to see a city like Moscow listed. Villages that are insufficiently known or very small are not listed and appear on the map only as nameless dots. If you are looking for an administrative region Go to the Index on page 185 and find the list of administrative regions. The numbers refer to the map on the inside back cover. Having found the region on this map, the reader will know which index map to use to search further. If you are looking for the big picture Go to the overview map on page 35. This map shows all of Russia’s Intact Forest Landscapes, along with the borders and Roman numerals of the five index maps. If you are looking for a certain part of Russia Find the appropriate index map. These show the borders of the detailed maps for different parts of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport and Infrastructural Basis of the Tourism Development Strategy in the Arkhangelsk Oblast © Aleksandr Yu
    Aleksandr Yu. TSVETKOV. Transport and infrastructural basis … 35 UDC [338.48+332.14](470.11)(045) DOI: 10.37482/issn2221-2698.2020.38.44 Transport and infrastructural basis of the tourism development strategy in the Arkhangelsk Oblast © Aleksandr Yu. TSVETKOV, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), associate professor E-mail: [email protected] Department of Management, Higher School of Economics, Management and Law, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Arkhangelsk, Russia Abstract. The article, devoted to the analysis of transport and geographical locations, describes possible strategies for the development of tourism in the Arkhangelsk Oblast. The main goal of the research was the development of logistic schemes of the transportation of tourists from the places of formation of tourist flows to the Arkhangelsk Oblast. The methodological basis of the article is to determine the economic dis- tances between potential tourist distribution centers and their places of interest in the area. Moscow, St. Petersburg, and Arkhangelsk were considered as the main towns of departure. Kargopol, Solvychegodsk, Kholmogory and Lomonosovo, Solovki, Kenozersky National Park, and Pinega caves are regarded as the main sites of tourist interest in the Arkhangelsk Oblast. It was determined that Kargopol is the most acces- sible for tourists, and Kenozersky National Park is the most recognizable by tourists but the least accessible. The object of world cultural heritage, the Monastery of the Transfiguration of the Saviour on Solovki is the most accessible for tourists from the territory of Karelia. It is recommended to optimize the schedule and to synchronize the work of transport for tourists to improve the transport accessibility of recreational facili- ties in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Charitable Activity of the Elena and Gennady Timchenko Foundation Timchenko Elena & Gennady Timchenko Foundation Foundation Contents
    2015 REPORT ON THE CHARITABLE ACTIVITY OF THE ELENA AND GENNADY TIMCHENKO FOUNDATION TIMCHENKO ELENA & GENNADY TIMCHENKO FOUNDATION FOUNDATION CONTENTS Message from Elena and Gennady Timchenko .....................4 Working with the Foundation.............................................109 Message from Xenia Frank .....................................................6 Selecting grant recipients .............................................. 110 Message from Maria Morozova .............................................8 Open grant competitions ............................................... 110 The Foundation’s mission statement and values ................10 Non-competitive support ................................................111 Work programme ..................................................................11 Duration of project support ............................................111 5 years of work – facts and results ...................................... 12 Programme evaluation system ...........................................111 Key results in 2015 .............................................................. 16 Risk management ...............................................................112 Interaction with stakeholders .............................................112 Working with enquiries from the public .........................112 THE OLDER GENERATION PROGRAMME .......................18 Working with regional agents .........................................113 Society for all Ages Focus Area ............................................24
    [Show full text]