The Ukrainian Weekly 2008, No.45

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Ukrainian Weekly 2008, No.45 www.ukrweekly.com INSIDE: • Rusyns seek autonomy in western Ukraine – page 3. • Paula Dobriansky receives Shevchenko Freedom Award – page 4. • Internment monument unveiled in Sault Ste. Marie – page 5. THEPublished U byKRAINIAN the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profitW associationEEKLY Vol. LXXVI No. 45 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 2008 $1/$2 in Ukraine Ukraine reacts IMF OKs $16.4 billion loan to Ukraine by Zenon Zawada Ukraine – People’s Self-Defense, Meanwhile, the IMF funds will enable to the election Kyiv Press Bureau Volodymyr Lytvyn and Tymoshenko the state to purchase, or nationalize, blocs. shares in stricken banks, thereby giving KYIV – The International Monetary The law’s biggest provision involves them a capital injection and stabilizing of Barack Obama Fund (IMF) on December 5 approved a creating a stabilization fund to raise bud- them. $16.4 billion loan to the Ukrainian gov- get revenues with new measures, such as “The crisis in all the world is being KYIV – President Viktor Yushchenko ernment – its biggest ever credit – to sta- and Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko of privatization of state assets, and then interpreted as a banking crisis,” said bilize Ukraine’s shaken financial system using the money to extend credit and Ukraine congratulated Sen. Barack and restore public confidence in the Prime Minister Tymoshenko. “And that’s Obama on his victory in the U.S. presi- financing to insolvent banks and con- nation’s banks. struction firms. (Continued on page 10) dential elections. The first tranche of $4.5 billion was “Congratulations on your election as released after Ukraine’s Parliament president of the United States,” wrote agreed to set aside the election financing Mr. Yushchenko on November 5. “It is conflict, after two weeks of fierce wran- ELECTION NOTEBOOK: Ukraine’s my strong conviction that during your gling, and approve anti-crisis legislation term in the office Ukraine-U.S. relations, on October 31, which was signed by based on the common values and close- President Viktor Yushchenko on elections now postponed indefinitely ness of interests in the international November 3. arena, will develop and strengthen in Besides propping up collapsing banks, by Zenon Zawada favor of our people.” Ukrainian leaders hoped the loan would Kyiv Press Bureau The Ukrainian president expressed restore public trust in the nation’s finan- confidence that the strategic partnership cial system, much of which eroded after KYIV – The Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc between Ukraine and the United States the government froze access to bank succeeded in indefinitely postponing the will further play a significant role in deposits on October 13 and then deval- 2008 pre-term parliamentary elections securing peace and stability worldwide. ued the hryvnia, causing many depositors with its leaders apologizing for their Mr. Yushchenko wished Sen. Obama to lose money. brutish behavior in recent weeks but nev- good health and success in his work for “The issue is we need to demonstrate ertheless vowing to overwhelm the courts the benefit of the American people. that the National Bank has a reserve in Prime Minister Tymoshenko sent a to prevent any vote. the national currency,” said President telegram to the president-elect, congratu- “In formal ways, we will practically Yushchenko, referring to the loan as lating him on his election victory. She bury the administrative courts with com- “psychological credit.” wrote: “Your victory is an inspiration for plaints,” Andrii Portnov, a Tymoshenko Though she offered a different propos- us. What seemed impossible is now pos- Bloc national deputy, said on November al, Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko sible.” 3. “In this period, we will create the most eventually agreed to support the presi- Ms. Tymoshenko said she is convinced powerful, most extensive legal service dent’s anti-crisis proposal, which was that the leadership and enthusiasm of the throughout all of Ukraine’s regions, ratified by 243 national deputies in the Website of the Government of Ukraine (Continued on page 10) Verkhovna Rada representing the Our (Continued on page 10) Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko. Kean University conference focuses on Holodomor Cooper Union stirs by Roma Hadzewycz Ukrainian community UNION, N.J. – Kean University on October 10 hosted an educational confer- with Picasso’s “Stalin” ence on the “Ukraine Famine-Genocide of 1932-1933” that featured presentations by Matthew Dubas by historians, educators and Holodomor survivors. NEW YORK – The Ukrainian commu- Billed by the university as a human nity of New York City mobilized to call for rights conference, the program’s stated the removal of a three-story high portrait aim was “to preserve the dignity of all depicting Joseph Stalin on display on the human beings, to promote human rights southern façade of Cooper Union’s around the world and to ensure that food Foundation Building, located at Third is never again used as a weapon.” Avenue and Seventh Street, in the Ukrainian The conference coordinator was Dr. neighborhood of Manhattan’s East Village. Ruth P. Griffith, who teaches a graduate The banner was 40 feet wide and 52 course titled “Ukrainian Famine- feet high and was installed on October 26 Genocide” that was first offered in the as part of Norwegian artist Lene Berg’s spring semester of 2006. Dr. Griffith is exhibit inside the Arthur A. Houghton Jr. the granddaughter of a Holodomor vic- Gallery. The portrait is a copy of the tim and the daughter of a survivor, Mary 1953 charcoal drawing “Stalin by Picasso Horbatiuk-Demsyn Piatnochka, who or Woman with Moustache.” spoke at the conference of her family’s Originally commissioned by Louis experience during the genocidal Famine. Aragon, editor of the Parisian newspaper The keynote address at the conference Les Lettres Francaises and a member of was delivered by Dr. Taras Hunczak, pro- Markian Hadzewycz the French Communist Party, as a memo- fessor emeritus of history at Rutgers rial tribute to Joseph Stalin after his At the Kean University conference “Ukraine Famine-Genocide” (from left) are: University, who underscored that “it was death, Mr. Aragon wanted to memorial- conference coordinator Dr. Ruth P. Griffith; her mother, a Holodomor survivor, (Continued on page 11) Mary Horbatiuk-Demsyn Piatnochka; and Dr. Taras Hunczak, keynote speaker. (Continued on page 4) 2 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 2008 No. 45 ANALYSIS NEWSBRIEFS Ukrainian cable TV networks President cuts Secretariat staff possible revival of the coalition in the Verkhovna Rada are the prime minister’s KYIV – Ukrainian President Viktor alone. He said that he personally does not ordered to drop Russian channels Yushchenko on November 4 signed a see any political force in the Parliament, decree on the reduction of budget spend- by Pavel Korduban ban the Russian-language programs of the except the Yulia Tymoshenko Bloc ing and personnel supporting the activity (YTB), that could back the incumbent Eurasia Daily Monitor RTVi and EuroNews channels, which are of Ukraine’s head of state. One-fourth of prime minister to interfere in the forma- based outside Russia. the Presidential Secretariat will be dis- Moscow has claimed that Kyiv’s recent “The powers-that-be want to cut off tion of a coalition. The president said the decision to banish several Russian TV chan- charged, and a number of presidential democratic coalition “would have worked Ukrainian society from the Russian infor- institutes will be closed. The staff of the nels from Ukrainian cable TV networks was mation space,” the PRU said in a statement, for a long period… if the prime minister National Institute of Strategic Studies has a violation of bilateral accords and of the “thereby violating freedom of speech in had been honest with the coalition, did been cut by 100 to 217 people. The rights of Russian speakers. Kyiv, on the Ukraine and the right of citizens to receive not hold back-door talks and consulta- National Institute of International other hand, says that the Russian channels full and true information.” The PRU, which tions how to turn Ukraine’s course to the Security and the National Security in question violated Ukrainian laws. is apparently going to play the Russian lan- opposite side.” The president added that Institute were united into one scientific Ukrainian cable TV operators, backed by guage card in the forthcoming parliamenta- the Our Ukraine – People’s Self-Defense center, as a result of which 178 positions pro-Russian politicians, may ignore the ban. ry election campaign, also accused the faction has no desire to return to the were liquidated. From now on, presiden- On September 23 the National TV and NRTR of violating the right of Russian coalition, and he emphasized that early tial advisers will be appointed exclusively Radio Broadcasting Council (NRTR), speakers to receive information in their elections under the current situation are Ukraine’s media regulating body, ordered native language (Ukrayinska Pravda, on freelance terms – they will not be reg- the only constitutional way out. cable networks to stop re-broadcasting the October 7). istered as civil servants and will not (Ukrinform) state-controlled Russian channels ORT and receive salaries. Forty-five employees of Moscow’s reaction has been predictably Uncertainty puts pressure on PM RTR and the private Ren TV beginning stormy. The Russian Foreign Affairs the Presidential Secretariat, 50 of the November 1. Ministry warned that the ban on the Russian National Security
Recommended publications
  • Eastern Europe
    * *»t« »t<»»t« ************* Eastern Europe INTRODUCTION FTER A PROTRACTED STRUGCLE, Nikita Khrushchev succeeded in July 1957 AL. in securing the removal from top Communist Party and government positions of Vyacheslav Molotov, Lazar Kaganovich, Georgi Malenkov, and Dmitri Shepilov. At the same time two other lesser party leaders, Mikail Pervukhin and Maxim Saburov, were removed from the Party presidium. The decision to remove them was taken at a plenary meeting of the Com- munist Party Central Committee in Moscow June 22-29, 1957. Khrushchev and the 309-member Central Committee accused the deposed leaders, the so- called "anti-Party group," of wanting to lead the Party back to the pattern of leadership and the political line that had prevailed under Josef Stalin. While there were varying interpretations as to which of the contending men and factions represented what policy, it was clear that in this all-important fight for power a new and significant element had been introduced. In his duel with the oldest and most authoritative leaders of the Party, Khrushchev could not muster more than about half of the presidium votes. The powerful support he needed to break the deadlock came from the Soviet army. The backing of Marshal Georgi Zhukov, according to reliable reports, assured Khrushchev's victory. At the same Central Committee meeting, Zhukov was elevated to full membership in the Party presidium. After the June plenum, the influence of Marshal Zhukov and his role in the government of the Soviet Union seemed to increase, and the marshal's pronouncements indicated that he did not underestimate his newly acquired power position.
    [Show full text]
  • WHOSE LANGUAGE DO WE SPEAK? Some Reflections on The
    A. Portnov, T. Portnova, S. Savchenko, V. Serhiienko, Whose Language...? Ab Imperio, 4/2020 the objectivity myth and emphasized the relevance of any historical text’s literary form but also, as some critics have argued, “denied the possibility 3 Andrii PORTNOV of fruitful professional discourse except within communities of believers.” White’s influential theory provoked no discussion in either Soviet or dias- Tetiana PORTNOVA pora Ukrainian historiography. During late perestroika, historians usually Serhii SAVCHENKO debated the challenges of writing new history in terms of “filling the blank Viktoriia SERHIIENKO spots” and overcoming Soviet censorship.4 There were Ukrainian scholars who responded to some of their Moscow-based colleagues’ call to embrace the methodology of the French Annales school and study mentalities,5 or make history a “true science” and study historical sources with mathematical methods.6 In the 1980s and 1990s, neither the drift toward historical anthro- WHOSE LANGUAGE DO WE SPEAK? pology and microhistory nor the strengthening of the traditional positivist Some Reflections on the Master Narrative approach by means of the historical method’s “machinization” helped to address the challenges of Metahistory. of Ukrainian History Writing One of the very first Ukrainian surveys of American poststructuralist his- tories warned that these encouraged scholars to take a narcissist stance and allow arbitrary analysis.7 Later a prominent Ukrainian conservative historian, Yaroslav Dashkevych, denounced White’s “extreme relativism”
    [Show full text]
  • Andrii Portnov
    ANDRII PORTNOV Kooperationspartner des Fachgebiets “Ostslawische Literaturen und Kulturen” (Prof. Frank) im Forum für Transregionale Studien (Berlin) und regelmäßiger Lehrbeauftragter des Instituts für Slawistik seit 2012 Emails: andrii.portnov@trafo‐berlin.de, portnov@europa‐uni.de Ausbildung, akademische Grade Promotion [PhD] (2005, Ivan Krypiakevych Institut für Ukrainistik, Lemberg, Ukraine); M.A. in Kulturwissenschaften (2003, mit Auszeichnung, Warschauer Universität, Polen); M.A. in Geschichte (2001, mit Auszeichnung, Dnipropetrovsk Universität, Ukraine). Berufserfahrung Lehre WS 2017/2018, Europa‐Universität Viadrina, Frankfurt/Oder, Vertretung der Professur Entangled History of Ukraine 2017, SciencesPo Lyon, Guest Professor WS 2016/2017, Freie Universität Berlin, Lehrauftrag am Osteuropa Institut 2016 SciencesPo Paris, Guest Professor 2012–2016, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Lehrauftrag am Institut für Slawistik WS 2015 Universität Basel University, Lehrauftrag 2015 Free University of Brussels, International Chair for the History of the Second World War Forschung 2016–2017 – Universität Genf, Senior Research Fellow 2012–2014, Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin, Fellow 2010, Centre d’études des mondes russe, caucasien et centre‐européen (CERCEC, Paris), Gast Wissenschaftler 2010–2012, Ivan Krypiakevych Institute for Ukrainian Studies, Senior Research Fellow 2008–2010, Institute for Strategic Studies, Kyiv, Senior Research Fellow 2007, Centre for Holocaust and Genocide Studies, Amsterdam, Gast Wissenschaftler 2004–2007, Universität
    [Show full text]
  • Russian State Archive for Social and Political History, Moscow
    Russian State Archive for Social and Political History, Moscow РОССИЙСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ АРХИВ СОЦИАЛЬНО-ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОЙ ИСТОРИИ (РГАСПИ) Vladislav Zubok London School of Economics [email protected] The Director of the Archive: Andrei Konstantinovich Sorokin Location: Bolshaia Dmitrovka St.,15 (the main collections and reading room) and Profsoiuznaia St., 82 (former archives of the Komsomol and its satellites). Tel: +7 (495) 694-40-34. The archive was closed in late March but reopened on July 27, 2020. The core of the archival collection was formed in the 1920s-70s on the basis of the documents of the Bolsheviks and other revolutionary political parties of Russia, the materials on European socialist movements, on Marx, Engels, Lenin, Rosa Luxemburg, etc. Before 1992, it was also the secret archive of the Bolshevik party (later CPSU) documents from 1919 until 1952. In 1993- 2011, RGASPI received many collections from the Archive of the President of the Russian Federation, most notably the Stalin fond (collection). Other valuable documents are osobaia papka (special dossiers) with documentation prepared for decision-making of the Party Politburo and Secretariat, the State Committee for Defence, the ruling body of the USSR during the war of 1941-45, the personal collections of Nikolai Bukharin, Lazar Kaganovich, Vyacheslav Molotov, Georgy Ordzhonikidze, Aleksei Rykov, Lev Trotsky, Andrei Zhdanov, Aleksandra Kollontai, etc. In 1999 the Archive took under its wing the former archive of the Komsomol (TsKhDMO), located on Profsoyuznaia St 82. Most of the collections in the archive have been declassified, including the osobaia papka, the Party protocols, the departments of the central party apparatus and of the permanent Party commissions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethnic Roots of Class Universalism
    Edinburgh Research Explorer The Ethnic Roots of Class Universalism Citation for published version: Riga, L 2008, 'The Ethnic Roots of Class Universalism: Rethinking the “Russian” Revolutionary Elite', American Journal of Sociology, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 649-705. https://doi.org/10.1086/592862 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1086/592862 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: American Journal of Sociology Publisher Rights Statement: © Riga, L. (2008). The Ethnic Roots of Class Universalism: Rethinking the “Russian” Revolutionary Elite. American Journal of Sociology, 114(3), 649-705 doi: 10.1086/592862. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 The Ethnic Roots of Class Universalism: Rethinking the “Russian” Revolutionary Elite Author(s): Liliana Riga Source: American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 114, No. 3 (November 2008), pp. 649-705 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/592862 . Accessed: 22/01/2014 06:01 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistic Ukrainization, 1923-1932
    3 Linguistic Ukrainization, 1923-1932 On October 10, 1920, Stalin published an artide in Pravda that for the first time authoritatively announced the Soviet policy of korenizatsiia: "It is nec- essary that all Soviet organs in the borderlands-the courts, the administration, the economic organs, organs oflocal power (as well as Party organs)-be com- posed to the greatest possible degree of people who know the customs, habits and language of the local population. »1 Korenizatsiia, as definitively formulated at party congresses in March 1921 and April 1923, consisted of two major tasks: the creation of national elites (Affirmative Action) and the promotion oflocal nationallanguages to a dominant position in the non-Russian territories (lin- guistic korenizatsiia). Linguistic korenizatsiia would prove much more difficult to achieve. Between April 1923 and December 1932, central party and soviet organs issued dozens of resolutions urging the immediate implementation of linguistic korenizatsiia. Local republican and oblast authorities issued hundreds, if not thousands, of similar decrees. Nevertheless, linguistic korenizatsiia failed almost everywhere. Why? 1 initially assumed that central authorities must have been sending mixed signals, publidy trumpeting the need for irnmediate korenizatsiia while privately letting it be known that this public rhetoric was largely for show. 1 was wrong. Not only did the soft-line soviet bureaucracies in charge of nationalities policy, such as TsIK's Soviet of Nationalities and VTsIK's Nationalities Depart- ment, vigilantly monitor the implementation of korenizatsiia, hard-line organs attached to the party's Central Committee were equally vigilant. The Orgburo 11. Stalin, "Politika sovetskoi vlasti po natsional'nomu voprosu v RDssü" (1920), in Marksizm i natsional'no-kolonial'nyi Tlopros (Moscow, 1934): 62.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Ukrainian Statehood: ХХ- the Beginning of the ХХІ Century
    NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LIFE AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE OF UKRAINE FACULTY OF THE HUMANITIES AND PEDAGOGY Department of History and Political Sciences N. KRAVCHENKO History of Ukrainian Statehood: ХХ- the beginning of the ХХІ century Textbook for students of English-speaking groups Kyiv 2017 UDК 93/94 (477) BBК: 63.3 (4 Укр) К 77 Recommended for publication by the Academic Council of the National University of Life and Environmental Science of Ukraine (Protocol № 3, on October 25, 2017). Reviewers: Kostylyeva Svitlana Oleksandrivna, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of History of the National Technical University of Ukraine «Kyiv Polytechnic Institute»; Vyhovskyi Mykola Yuriiovych, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor of the Faculty of Historical Education of the National Pedagogical Drahomanov University Вilan Serhii Oleksiiovych, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of History and Political Sciences of the National University of Life and Environmental Science of Ukraine. Аristova Natalia Oleksandrivna, Doctor of Pedagogic Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of English Philology of the National University of Life and Environmental Science of Ukraine. Author: PhD, Associate Professor Nataliia Borysivna Kravchenko К 77 Kravchenko N. B. History of Ukrainian Statehood: ХХ - the beginning of the ХХІ century. Textbook for students of English-speaking groups. / Kravchenko N. B. – Куiv: Еditing and Publishing Division NUBiP of Ukraine, 2017. – 412 р. ISBN 978-617-7396-79-5 The textbook-reference covers the historical development of Ukraine Statehood in the ХХ- at the beginning of the ХХІ century. The composition contains materials for lectures, seminars and self-study. It has general provisions, scientific and reference materials - personalities, chronology, terminology, documents and manual - set of tests, projects and recommended literature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Famine in Soviet Ukraine: Toward New Avenues Of
    THE GREAT FAMINE IN SOVIET UKRAINE: TOWARD NEW AVENUES OF INQUIRY INTO THE HOLODOMOR A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By Troy Philip Reisenauer In Partial Fulfillment for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Major Department: History, Philosophy, and Religious Studies June 2014 Fargo, North Dakota North Dakota State University Graduate School Title THE GREAT FAMINE IN SOVIET UKRAINE: TOWARD NEW AVENUES OF INQUIRY INTO THE HOLODOMOR By Troy Philip Reisenauer The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Dr. John K. Cox Chair Dr. Tracy Barrett Dr. Dragan Miljkovic Approved: July 10, 2014 Dr. John K. Cox Date Department Chair ABSTRACT Famine spread across the Union of Social Soviet Republics in 1932 and 1933, a deadly though unanticipated consequence of Joseph Stalin’s attempt in 1928 to build socialism in one country through massive industrialization and forced collectivization of agriculture known as the first Five-Year Plan. This study uses published documents, collections, correspondence, memoirs, secondary sources and new insight to analyze the famine of 1932-1933 in Ukraine and other Soviet republics. It presents the major scholarly works on the famine, research that often mirrors the diverse views and bitter public disagreement over the issue of intentionality and the ultimate culpability of Soviet leadership. The original contribution of this study is in the analysis of newly published primary documents of the 1920s and 1930s from the Russian Presidential Archives, especially vis-à-vis the role of Stalin and his chief lieutenants at the center of power and the various representatives at the republic-level periphery.
    [Show full text]
  • Colloquium Final
    Ukrainian Studies Online November 30, 2020 January 25, 2021 Tobias Wals (Leibniz Institute for Contemporary History, Munich) Laura Eckl (Bergische U Wuppertal) Colloquium Zhytomyr in the Second World War Hunger in Kharkiv and Sumy Oblast: Supply Strategies Commentator Olena Petrenko (Ruhr U, Bochum) and Experiences in Dealing with Scarcity during the November 2, 2020 – February 22, 2021 German Military Occupation 1941–1943 December 7, 2020 every Monday, 6 pm Commentator Kathryn David (Vanderbilt U, Nashville) Zoom events: registration via [email protected] Ielizaveta Oliinyk (Mozarteum U / U of Salzburg) February 1, 2021 November 2, 2020 Documentary theater as a witness to the historic changes in contemporary Ukraine Maryna Snizhynska (Kyiv-Mohyla Academy) Opening Discussion Commentator Bohdan Tokarskyi (Cambridge U) "Ukrainian Parnassians": Pro and Contra Fabian Baumann (U of Basel), Joanna Konieczna-Sałamatin Commentator Hanna Gnedkova (U of Vienna) (U of Warsaw), Mykola Riabchuk (National Academy of December 14, 2020 Sciences of Ukraine), Natalia Sinkevych (LMU Munich) Ihor Andriichuk (The New School for Social Research, New York) February 8, 2021 Moderated by Andrii Portnov (European U Viadrina, Internationalism or Imperialism? The Communist Party of Oleksandr Avramchuk (U of Warsaw) Frankfurt/Oder) Ukraine after the Dissolution of the Soviet Union Writing a history of the ‘non-historical’ nation. A November 9, 2020 Commentator Kyrylo Tkachenko (European U Viadrina, Frankfurt/ shaping of Ukrainian studies and the Polish-Ukrainian
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Thinking U.S.-Soviet Relations in 1956: Nikita Khrushchev's Secret Speech, the Poznán Revolt, the Return of Władysław Gomułka, and the Hungarian Revolt
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 2014 Re-Thinking U.S.-Soviet Relations in 1956: Nikita Khrushchev's Secret Speech, the Poznán Revolt, the Return of Władysław Gomułka, and the Hungarian Revolt Emily Parsons Trinity College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Parsons, Emily, "Re-Thinking U.S.-Soviet Relations in 1956: Nikita Khrushchev's Secret Speech, the Poznán Revolt, the Return of Władysław Gomułka, and the Hungarian Revolt". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2014. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/365 1 Re-Thinking U.S.-Soviet Relations in 1956: Nikita Khrushchev’s Secret Speech, the Poznań Revolt, the Return of Władysław Gomułka, and the Hungarian Revolt Emily Parsons History Department Senior Thesis Advisor: Samuel Kassow Trinity College 2013-2014 2 Table of Contents: Acknowledgements 3 Introduction 4 Part One: The Chronology of the Events of the Cold War in 1956 12 Chapter 1: Do As I Say Not As I Do: Nikita Khrushchev’s Secret Speech 13 Chapter 2: The Eastern Bloc Begins to Crack: Poznań Revolt and Polish October 21 Chapter 3: Khrushchev Goes Back on His Word: The Hungarian Revolt of 1956 39 Part Two: The United States Reactions and Understanding of the Events of 1956 60 Chapter 4: Can Someone Please Turn on the Lights? It’s Dark in Here: United States Reactions to the Khrushchev’s Secret Speech 61 Chapter 5: “When They Begin to Crack, They Can Crack Fast.
    [Show full text]
  • CIUS Newsletter 2010
    CIUS Newsletter 2010 Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies 4-30 Pembina Hall, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2H8 Italian Scholar’s Lecture Represents a Milestone in the Study of the Holodomor The great Ukrainian-Kuban famine of 1932–33—the Holodomor—was one of the determinative events of the twentieth century. Nevertheless, it was largely ignored by scholars until the last few years of the existence of the Soviet Union. One of the scholars who began studying the famine in the late 1980s was Andrea Graziosi, now an internationally recognized specialist on the Soviet state and its policies toward the peasantry and one of the world’s leading authorities on the Holodomor. From 14 to 21 November 2009 he vis- ited Toronto and Edmonton to lecture on “The Holodomor and the Soviet Famines, 1931–33.” The title of the lecture is indica- Monument to victims of the 1932‒33 Holodomor in Ukraine on a hill of the Kyivan Cave Mon- tive of Dr. Graziosi’s comprehensive astery. Photo: Andy Ignatov approach to the study of the Holodo- identified some of its special features peasants from Ukraine and the Kuban mor in Soviet Ukraine and the Kuban and national characteristics. Particu- to leave for other areas of the USSR in within the context of Soviet state policy larly telling, in his view, were Moscow’s search of food. toward the peasantry from 1917 to exclusive policies taken against the Dr. Graziosi also noted other 1933 and, more particularly, the pan- peasantry in Ukraine and the Kuban measures taken against Ukrainians in Soviet famines of 1931–33, including region in the North Caucasus, which this period or immediately afterward.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ambiguities of Soviet “Piedmonts”: Soviet Borderland
    THE AMBIGUITIES OF SOVIET “PIEDMONTS”: SOVIET BORDERLAND POLICIES IN THE UKRAINIAN SSR AND THE MOLDOVAN ASSR, 1922-1934 Alexandr Voronovici A DISSERTATION in History Presented to the Faculties of the Central European University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Budapest, Hungary 2016 CEU eTD Collection Supervisor: Professor Alexei Miller ii Copyright in the text of this dissertation rests with the author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained by the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copied made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author. I hereby declare that this dissertation contains no materials accepted for any other degrees and no materials previously written and/or published by another person unless otherwise noted. CEU eTD Collection iii Abstract The dissertation analyzes Soviet borderland policies in the Ukrainian SSR and the Moldovan ASSR in the 1920s and early 1930s. Adopting the situational approach, I explore the Soviet struggle for borderlands on the Western border and the role of the cross-border cultural ties in it. The dissertation argues that the negotiations, different interpretations and the interplay between actors on both sides of the Soviet Western border influenced and framed the evolution of borderland policies in the Ukrainian SSR and the Moldovan ASSR in 1920s. Although, the Soviet Union was a centralized state with a disciplined party, there was still considerable space for conflicting interpretations of Moscow's directives and the promotion of personal agenda by Soviet leaders and activists.
    [Show full text]