Improving the Sustainability of Road Management and Financing in Armenia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Improving the Sustainability of Road Management and Financing in Armenia Report No. 66533-AM Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized IMPROVING THE SUSTAINABILITY OF ROAD MANAGEMENT AND FINANCING IN ARMENIA Public Disclosure Authorized OCTOBER 13, 2011 THE WORLD BANK Public Disclosure Authorized WASHINGTON, D.C. Abbreviations and Acronyms AADT Average Annual Daily Traffic ADB Asian Development Bank ARD Armenian Road Directorate EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development ECA Europe and Central Asia EU European Union FWD Falling Weight Deflectometer GDP Gross Domestic Product GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GTZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit GIS Geographic Information System Government Government of Armenia HDM-4 Highway Development and Management Model (Version – 4) IFI International Financial Institution IT Information Technology MCF Millennium Challenge Fund MOTC Ministry of Transport and Communications NTCC National Traffic Control Centre OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development PPP Public Private Partnership RDCAD Road Data Collection and Analysis Department RMS Road Management System RMU Road Maintenance Units RONET Road Network Evaluation Tools Model Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... i A. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 B. Overview of the Armenian Road Sector .............................................................................. 2 Road Network ....................................................................................................................... 3 Institutional Setup ................................................................................................................. 6 Road Maintenance .............................................................................................................. 10 Road Asset Management System ....................................................................................... 13 C. Expenditures in the Road Sector ........................................................................................ 17 Maintenance and Rehabilitation Requirements on Interstate and Republican Roads ........ 20 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 24 D. Options for Sustainable Road Management Financing ...................................................... 25 Option 1: Increase Efficiency of Current Expenditures ..................................................... 25 Option 2: Develop Cost-effective Design Standards for Low-traffic Roads ..................... 26 Option 3: Increase Road-user Charges ............................................................................... 27 Option 4: Earmarking ......................................................................................................... 30 Option 5: Borrowing .......................................................................................................... 30 Option 6: Mobilizing Private Sector Resources through Public-Private Partnerships ....... 31 Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................................. 34 Annex 1. Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) ............................................................................... 40 Annex 2. Performance-based Contracts (PBCs) ........................................................................... 43 Annex 3. Comparison between Traditional Contracting and Output- and Performance-based Road Contracts (OPRCs) in the Armenian Road Sector .................................................... 45 Annex 4. Review of International Experience with OPRCs ......................................................... 47 Annex 5. Success Factors for Road Asset Management Systems (RAMS) ................................. 52 Annex 6. HDM-4 Scenarios for Addressing the Interstate and Republican Road Rehabilitation Backlog ............................................................................................................................... 54 Option 1: Minimize Total Transport Costs Scenario ......................................................... 54 Option 2: Expenditures of US$110 Million per Year Scenario ......................................... 55 Option 3: Eliminate Rehabilitation Backlog in 10 Years Scenario .................................... 55 Option 4: Keep Current Condition Scenario ...................................................................... 56 Annex 7. HDM-4 Road Maintenance Works Economic Evaluation ............................................ 57 The HDM-4 Model ............................................................................................................... 57 Primary Road Works Economic Evaluation ......................................................................... 57 Local Road Works Economic Evaluation ............................................................................. 60 Optimal Periodic Maintenance Treatment ............................................................................ 62 Tables Table 1. Comparison of Different Expenditure Scenarios ............................................................. iv Table 2. High Priority Recommendations ................................................................................... viii Table 3. Road Definition and Length, 2009 ................................................................................... 4 Table 4. Trend of Road Classes Lengths in km .............................................................................. 5 Table 5. Length and Condition of the National Road Network (2009) .......................................... 5 Table 6. Road Network Condition and Asset Value ....................................................................... 6 Table 7. Investment Program on the Road Network from 2005-2011 (US$ million) .................. 18 Table 8. Consequences of Different Expenditure Scenarios ........................................................ 22 Table 9. Funding Requirements of Different Expenditure Scenarios ........................................... 25 Table 10. Gasoline and Diesel Prices (US cents per liter, unless otherwise stated) ..................... 27 Table 11. Fuel Taxes in Armenia, Effective from January 1, 2011 .............................................. 29 Figures Figure 1. Road Density ................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2. Main Roads Asset Value ................................................................................................. 6 Figure 3. Main Roads Length and Traffic ...................................................................................... 6 Figure 4. Organizational Structure of the Road Sector in Armenia ................................................ 7 Figure 5. Present Value of Total Transport Costs (US$ million) ................................................. 23 Figure 6. Interstate and Republican Roads – Percentage of the Network in Good or Fair Condition (%)................................................................................................................. 24 Figure 7. Gasoline Price Composition .......................................................................................... 29 Figure 8. Financing Sources for Highways Funded from Government and PPPs (Concession) .. 32 Figure 9. Option 1: Minimize Total Transport Costs: Annual Road Expenditures from Years 1-20 (US$ millions) ............................................................................................. 55 Figure 10. Option 2: Eliminate Rehabilitation Backlog in 10 Years: Annual Road Expenditures from Years 1-20 (US$ millions) ...............................................................56 Acknowledgments This report was written by a Bank team comprised of Rodrigo Archondo-Callao (Sr. Highway Engineer, ECSS5 and Task Team Leader), Carolina Monsalve (Transport Economist), Mirtha Pokorny (Economist, Consultant), Cesar Queiroz (Institutional Specialist, Consultant) and Anita Shrestha (Operations Analyst, ECSS5). Essential support to the Study was provided by Arthur Kochnakyan (Economist, ECSS2), Irina Tevosyan (Program Assistant, ECCAR), Mher Hovsepyan (Consultant) and Giorgi Japaridze (Consultant). The team would like to thank Henry G.R. Kerali (Sector Manager Transport, ECSSD) and Christopher R. Bennett (Sr. Transport Specialist, EASNS and former Task Team Leader of the Study) for quality control and overall guidance and the peer reviewers Mustapha Benmaamar (Sr. Transport Specialist, EASIS), Steven Brushett (Lead Transport Specialist, LCSTR) and Shomik Mehndiratta (Sr. Transport Specialist, EASCS). The team is also thankful to Ben Gericke (Lead Transport Specialist, ECSSD) and Vickram Cuttaree (Senior Infrastructure Economist, ECSS5) for their comments. The team would like to acknowledge contributions from representatives of Government (including the Ministry of Transport and Communications, the Armenian Road Directorate, Transport Project Implementation Unit) and other stakeholders in Armenia, including the Asian Development Bank). Executive Summary As part of a wider transport sector dialogue with the Government of Armenia (Government), the World Bank conducted a performance
Recommended publications
  • The World Bank Rural Infrastructure in Armenia
    30312 Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Rural Infrastructure in Armenia: Addressing Gaps in Service Delivery Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Infrastructure and Energy Services Department Europe and Central Asia Region 1st September 2004 FINAL REPORT: 1st September 2004 Disclaimer: This paper is published to communicate the results of the Bank’s work to the development community with minimum delay. The typescript of this paper, therefore, has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formal printed texts and the World Bank accepts no responsibility for errors. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank cannot guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply on the part of the World Bank any judgment of the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. © 2004 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), The World Bank. ii FINAL REPORT: 1st September 2004 CONTENTS Abbreviations And Acronyms vi Acknowledgments vii Overview and Summary of Recommendations 1 Introduction 5 Why did we do this Study?........................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives
    WIND ENERGY IN ARMENIA: OVERVIEW OF POTENTIAL AND DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES ASSISTANCE TO ENERGY SECTOR TO STRENGTHEN ENERGY SECURITY AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONTRACT NUMBER EPP-I-08-03-00008-00 MARCH 2010 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by PA Government Services Inc. Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives ASSISTANCE TO ENERGY SECTOR TO STRENGTHEN ENERGY SECURITY AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONTRACT NUMBER EPP-I-08-03-00008-00 The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives ASSISTANCE TO ENERGY SECTOR TO STRENGTHEN ENERGY SECURITY AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONTRACT NUMBER EPP-I-08-03-00008-00 March 2010 © PA Consulting Group 2010 Prepared for: United States Agency for PA Government Services Inc. International Development 4601 N. Fairfax Drive Armenia Mission Suite 600 1 American Ave. Arlington, VA 22203 Yerevan 0082 Armenia Prepared by: PA Government Services Inc. Tel: +1 571 227 9000 Fax: +1 571 227 9001 www.paconsulting.com Version: 1.0 Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of potential and development perspectives. March 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Summary 1-1 2. Introduction 2-1 2.1 International Trends 2-1 2.2 State of the energy sector in Armenia 2-3 3. Wind Studies 3-1 4. Wind Measurements 4-1 5. Wind Energy Potential 5-1 6. Development perspectives 6-1 6.1 Technical limitations 6-1 6.2 Perspective Sites 6-3 6.3 Grid Interconnection 6-8 6.4 Economic Limitations 6-11 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Ice: the Role of Civil
    The failure of the 2009 Protocols to establish and develop diplomatic relations between Armenia and Turkey has largely overshadowed the success of civil society organizations in advancing the normalization process over the past decade. This report aims to help address this imbalance through a detailed account Breaking the Ice: of the United States Department of State-funded “Dialogue-Building between Turkey and Armenia” project, implemented by the Global Political Trends Center (GPoT) of Istanbul Kültür University, Internews Network, Internews Armenia, the Yerevan Press Club and CAM Film between September 2010 and December 2011. The Role of Civil Society and Media in Including an introduction that analyzes the current “frozen” state and historical background of Turkish- Armenian relations, Breaking the Ice: The Role of Civil Society and Media in Turkey-Armenia Relations presents the writings and reflections of the dozens of Turkish and Armenian journalists and students who participated in the project. The output of the Dialogue-Building Project demonstrates the continued, if not Turkey-Armenia Relations heightened, importance of civil society and media-based initiatives in the Turkey-Armenia normalization process, post-Protocols. Susae Elanchenny & Narod Maraşlıyan Since its founding in 2008, GPoT Center has played an active role in rapprochement and reconciliation projects between Turkey and Armenia through organizing numerous exchanges, roundtable discussions and conferences with the participation of leading Turkish civil society activists, academics, journalists and retired diplomats. For more information on these projects and GPoT Center, please visit www.gpotcenter.org. ISBN: 978-605-4233-80-9 Breaking the Ice: The Role of Civil Society and Media in Turkey-Armenia Relations An Evaluation of the “Dialogue-Building between Turkey and Armenia” Project Susae Elanchenny & Narod Maraşlıyan April 2012 BREAKING THE ICE: THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOcietY anD MEDia IN TUrkeY-Armenia RELatiOns Istanbul Kültür University Publication No.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia Seeking & Travelling Deeper
    ARMENIA SEEKING & TRAVELLING DEEPER UNDISCOVERED ARMENIA Exclusive small group cultural and historical trekking expedition led by international and local guides. Discover Unknown Armenia: A journey from the capital city of Yerevan, towered over by the snow-capped peaks of Mount Ararat, through the ancient prehistoric and Christian history of this ancient land and trek into the mountains and along ancient pilgrim and silk trading routes through landscapes, historic sites and rural communities seldom visited by tourism. Interact with local communities, culture and history in a way that few visitors to Armenia do. An extraordinary 12 night / 11 day exploration, into the ancient and modern culture and remote landscapes of rural Southern Armenia. The journey involves 6 days of pioneering trekking routes between Vaghatin/Vorotnavank ancient and modern villages far off the tourism beaten track. itzen Old Khot Old Harzis Bardzravan Tatev Taandzatap An ancient land of tradition, culture and history within stunning mountain landscapes. Armenia is an ancient land with a rich culture and identity. A cradle of civilisation which flourished on its fertile high plateaus and gained protection and sanctuary in its mountainous landscape. It is a land fought over by Byzantine, Persian, Roman and Islamic empires as an important centre and a major component of the ancient Silk Trading Routes. Armenia was also the seat of ancient kings who embraced early Christianity in the 3rd century making Armenia the first sovereign nation in the world to adopt Christianity and a centre for pilgrimage and ecclesiastical architecture, culture and learning. In modern times, Armenia was part of the Soviet Union and became independent in 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • English Were Elaborated and Submitted on a Regular Basis to the World Bank Team
    Public Disclosure Authorized CONNECTING THE DOTS: TRANSPORT, POVERTY, AND SOCIAL Public Disclosure Authorized INCLUSION - EVIDENCE FROM ARMENIA December 2017 Transport and ICT Global Pracce EUROPE Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Connecting the Dots: Transport, Poverty, and Social Inclusion - Evidence from Armenia December 2017 Transport and ICT Global Practice EUROPE CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective November 1, 2017) Currency Unit = Armenian Dram (AMD) AMD 486,671 = US$1 US$ 0,00021 = AR$ 1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 - December 31 Regional Vice President: Regional Vice President:Cyril Muller Country Director: Country Director:Mercy Miyang Tembon Senior Global Practice Director: Senior Global Practice Director:Jose Luis Irigoyen Practice Manager: Practice Manager:Juan Gaviria Task Team Leader(s): Task Team Leader(s):Steven Farji Weiss Standard Disclaimer: This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Copyright Statement: The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia Labor Market Evaluation and Strategy Assessment
    Armenia Labor Market Evaluation and Strategy Assessment Promoting Jobs in Armenia: Which Labor-Oriented Policy Approaches Are Worth Pursuing? Submitted to USAID/Armenia Global Workforce in Transition (GWIT) IQC USAID Contract No. GDG-1-00-02-0003-00 April 25, 2003 Education Development Center 1000 Potomac Street, NW, Suite 350, Washington DC 20007 202-572-3735 On the Web at www.gwit.us Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................6 THE CURRENT SITUATION .................................................................................................11 Labor Market Overview......................................................................................................12 Demand Side Overview .....................................................................................................16 Supply Side Overview ........................................................................................................20 OPTIONS FOR CROSSCUTTING USAID TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ...................................24 Criteria for Prioritizing Options ...........................................................................................25 Assistance Options to Create a More Efficient Labor Market to Support a Dynamic Market Economy ..........................................................................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • ARMENIA (Via Georgia) in 2016
    BIRD TOURISM REPORTS 4/2016 Petri Hottola ARMENIA (via Georgia) in 2016 Fig. 1. Late spring is the time of flowers in the Caucasus region. From 25th April to 6th May, 2016, I finally was able to travel to Armenia for birding, and also to realize my third visit in Georgia, after a long break since the nation became free of Russian rule. The journey was quite an enjoyable one and inspired me to write this report to help others to get there, too. I myself was particularly encouraged and helped by a 2014 report by two Swedes, Thomas Pettersson and Krister Mild. Vasil Ananian was also contacted in regard to Caspian Snowcock and he let me know the current situation, helping to avoid sites which have become empty or required a local guide. I have nothing against somebody employing a guide to guarantee a better success rate in this case, but being guided is not my personal preference. The main target species of the trip were as follows: For Georgia – Caucasian Grouse, Caucasian Snowcock, Güldenstädt’s Redstart and Great Rosefinch. For Armenia – Dalmatian Pelican, Caspian Snowcock, See-see Partridge, Radde’s Accentor, Eurasian Crimson-winged Finch, Mongolian Finch and Black-headed Bunting. Even though my life list already was around 7.300 in April 2016, I still missed some relatively common species such as the pelican and the bunting. The secondary target list, the Western Palaearctic region lifers, included: Red-tailed Wheatear, Upcher’s Warbler, Menetries’s Warbler, Eastern Rock Nuthatch, Wallcreeper, White-throated Robin, Red-fronted Serin, Grey-necked Bunting and Pale Rock Sparrow.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Consultancy on Assessing Neonatal Care Services at Maternity and Primary Healthcare Levels in Armenia
    Gerald and Patricia Turpanjian School of Public Health Avedisian Onanian Center for Health Services Research and Development Institutional consultancy on Assessing Neonatal Care Services at Maternity and Primary Healthcare Levels in Armenia Study Team: Anahit Demirchyan, MD, MPH Dzovinar Melkom Melkomian, DVM, MPH, MBA Gohar Abelyan, MS, MPH Varduhi Petrosyan, MS, PhD October, 2017 Yerevan Table of Content ABBREVAITONS ........................................................................................................................................ v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ vii ԱՄՓՈՓՈՒՄ .............................................................................................................................................. x 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Study rationale ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study objectives................................................................................................................................. 2 2. DESK REVIEW OF AVAILABLE SOURCES ................................................................................... 3 2.1 Neonatal mortality as a global target ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Assistance Consultant's Report Armenia: Preparing the North-South Road Corridor Development Project
    Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report Project Number: 7208-ARM May 2010 Armenia: Preparing the North-South Road Corridor Development Project Prepared by PADECO Co., Ltd. For Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City Philippines This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. (For project preparatory technical assistance: All the views expressed herein may not be incorporated into the proposed project’s design. Asian Development Bank TA7208-ARM Ministry of Transport and Communication Republic of Armenia Preparing the North-South Road Corridor Development Project VOLUME I MFF Framework FINAL REPORT May 2010 TA7208-ARM Preparing the North-South Road Corridor Development Project Final Report PADECO Co., Ltd. Volume I VOLUME I MFF FRAMEWORK CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Study Background .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Report Structure ................................................................................................................. 2 SECTION 2 NATIONAL ECONOMY ................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council
    UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council TRANS/SC.1/1998/3 1 July 1998 Original: ENGLISH ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE INLAND TRANSPORT COMMITTEE Working Party on Road Transport (Ninety-second session, 19-21 October 1998, agenda item 3 (a)(ii)) ROAD TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE European Agreement on Main International Traffic Arteries (AGR) Ad Hoc Meeting on the Implementation of the AGR and Results of the Round Table on the Extension of the E-road Network to the Caucasus and Central Asian ECE Member States Transmitted by the Government of Armenia Note: At its sixteenth session (30 April - 1 May 1998, Geneva), the Ad Hoc Meeting on the Implementation of the AGR considered the proposals for new E-roads made by the Government of Armenia and contained in TRANS/SC.1/AC.5/1998/2. The proposals were approved with the exception of those with Azerbaijan and Turkey and may be found in part II of the annex to TRANS/SC.1/AC.5/32. The following document contains background information on the infrastructure and transport situation in Armenia, which the Working Party may wish to consider during its discussion of the extension of the E Road network to the Caucasus and Central Asian ECE Member States. ___________ GE.98- TRANS/SC.1/1998/3 page 2 1. The Republic of Armenia is situated in the southern Transcaucasus. Land area: 30,000 km2 Population (1995): 3.7 million Capital: Yerevan (population 1.2 million) Administrative divisions: 10 regions and the city of Yerevan, which has the status of a region Currency: dram Member of the United Nations since 2 March 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Report of the LOGMOS Master Plan
    Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea II ENPI 2011 / 264 459 Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea II in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan LOGMOS Master Plan – Annex 5 Road Sector Overview September 2014 This project is funded by A project implemented by the European Union Egis International / Dornier Consulting Master Plan Annex 5 Page 1 of 120 Logistics Processes and Motorways of the Sea II TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................. 5 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 13 1.1 CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................................... 13 1.2 CONTENT OF THE REPORT ............................................................................................................. 13 2 ROAD SECTOR ORGANISATION: INSTITUTIONAL SETTINGS AND POLICY ............................ 15 2.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 15 2.2 ROAD SECTOR ORGANISATION IN CENTRAL ASIA ............................................................................. 15 2.2.1 Kazakhstan ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Content
    DRAFT FINAL REPORT The World Bank ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN POST CONFLICT TRANSPORT STUDY Table of Content SUMMARY 1 BACKGROUND 2 General 2 Standards and quality of work 3 Road machinery and equipment 4 ARMENIA 6 1 Transport potential 6 1.1 Transport needs, 6 1.2 Transport fleet characteristics 6 1.3 Traffic estimates 6 2 Institutional capacity 7 2.1 Road sector institutions (Client functions) 7 2.2 Road design 8 2.3 Road maintenance 8 3 Rehabilitation and improvement program 12 3.1 Road inspection and condition survey 12 3.2 Rehabilitation and reconstruction program 13 3.3 Program components 14 3.4 Institutional development needs and recommended actions 15 AZERBAIJAN 17 4 Transport potential 17 4.1 Transport needs, 17 4.2 Transport fleet characteristics 17 4.3 Traffic estimates 18 5 Institutional capacity 18 5.1 Road sector institutions (Client functions) 18 5.2 Road design 19 5.3 Road maintenance 20 6 Rehabilitation and improvement program 25 6.1 Road inspection and condition survey. 25 6.2 Rehabilitation and reconstruction program 26 6.3 Rehabilitation and reconstruction program in the conflict area. 26 6.4 Coordination of rehabilitation of the Occupied Zone 28 6.5 Improvement of roads outside the Conflict Zone 30 6.6 Program components 30 6.7 Institutional development needs and recommended actions. 33 APPENDICES 34 SWEROAD 24 August, 2000 DRAFT FINAL REPORT The World Bank ARMENIA AND AZERBAIJAN POST CONFLICT TRANSPORT STUDY Summary When "The Great Peace" occurs, two things will happen, which affects the need for roads and roadwork: Resettling in the evacuated areas Increased flows of goods and people between countries Resettling is not a major problem in Armenia, where the number of refugees is small, and where the refugees are said to have settled elsewhere in Armenia or abroad and have no intentions to move back to their previous locations.
    [Show full text]