2.3 Armenia Road Network

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2.3 Armenia Road Network 2.3 Armenia Road Network Distance Matrix Road Security Weighbridges and Axle Load Limits Road Class and Surface Conditions Armenia has a relatively well-developed road network, serving all areas of its economy with 257.6 km of roads per 1,000 km2. Most of freight and passenger transport is made by road. The road network is 7,700 km long with 1,400 km of interstate roads, 2,520 km of regional roads and 3,780 km of local roads. Surface condition of these roads varies from excellent to fair, although all are passable. Many sections are dual carriageway. The southern half of the country is very mountainous and has only one single main road stretching from Vaik to Meghri on the Iranian border. Damage to this road due to an earthquake or landslide could severely affect transportation of supplies to the region. Secondary roads are in poor condition and local knowledge would be essential before dispatching any supplies along such routes. The average width of the main roads is from 6 to 8 m and the secondary roads up to around 5 m. The road surface is mainly asphalt. Most of the roads are open all year, however during the winter; the roads in the North (Shirak and Lori Marzes) and in the South (Synik) could be closed for shorter periods due to insufficient snow cleaning machinery. The heavy snow and fogs are mostly common from the end of January to the beginning of February From 1992 till nowadays road reconstruction and rehabilitation are one of main areas were government of Armenia is involved together with different international organizational and fund, such as World Bank and MCA (Millennium Challenges Account) and All Armenian Fund. With help of these organizations all major roads and now even smaller road has been reconstructed and some portions even completely rebuilt. Such as recently built tunnel between roads Sevan-Dilijan let to bypass certain mount passes. Overall road maintenance relies on Ministry of Transport and Communication of the Republic of Armenia. Distance Matrix DISTANCES FROM CAPITAL CITY TO MAJOR TOWNS (km) Yerevan Gyumri Vanadzor Goris Vardenis Ashotsk Meghri Idjevan Yerevan - 125 118 240 162 160 373 135 Gyumri 125 - 60 365 238 36 498 136 Vanadzor 118 60 - 368 166 92 491 76 Goris 240 365 368 - 402 400 133 375 Vardenis 162 238 166 402 - 274 535 156 Ashotsk 160 36 92 400 274 - 533 172 Page 1 Meghri 373 498 491 133 535 533 - 508 Idjevan 135 136 76 375 156 172 508 - Road Security Public Safety is of major concern to the Republic of Armenia established in National Security Strategy of the Republic of Armenia. High level political interest in improving road safety clearly exists in Armenia, with the ambition to achieve the good practice road safety levels found in Europe. Armenia is firmly committed to improving its safety performance. In December 2005, a Presidential decree formed a multi-agency Task Force to develop proposals to address traffic management and safety issues and to develop proposals to reform the provision of traffic safety management services provided by the traffic police. The vehicle fleet in Armenia is old (12 years on average) and of relatively poor safety quality, however at least 10,000 newer vehicles are imported annually. Armenia is experiencing rapid growth in motor vehicle ownership and use. In the last five years the motor vehicle fleet increased by 30%, while the traffic carried by road increased by 38% (freight) and 61% (passengers). This rapid motorization is causing traffic congestion in Yerevan and traffic collisions to increase rapidly across the country There have been insecurity incidents on the border between Armenia and Azerbaijan mainly in areas of Tavush and Gegharkunik regions, with several incidents on road between Ijevan and Noyemberyan, which passes close to the border and military emplacements. In the winter due to heavy snows some roads, especially road from Vanadzor to Yerevan and Yerevan to Kapan might be closed for one or two days, in winter all trucks have to have chains to drive through mountainous areas. Weighbridges and Axle Load Limits According to local legislation there are limits on certain axle loads: Single axle up to 10 mt Double axle up to 18 mt Triple axel up to 22 mt Above these limits there are charges per km, which has to be paid at the border crossing, in case trucks are registered not in Armenia, and trucks registered in Armenia within 30 days. Charges per km for truck with single axle exceeding load of 10 tons AMD USD Load Capacity: From 10 – up to 10.5 tons 45.00 0.11 Load Capacity: From 10.5 – up to 11 tons 110.00 0.27 Load Capacity: From 11.00 – up to 11.5 tons 175.00 0.42 Load Capacity: From 11.5 – up to 12.00 tons 265.00 0.64 Load Capacity: From 12.00 – up to 12.5 tons 375.00 0.91 Load Capacity: From 12.5 – up to 13.00 tons 530.00 1.28 Load Capacity: From 13.00 – up to 13.5 tons 770.00 1.87 Load Capacity: From 13.50 – up to 14.0 tons 1100.00 2.66 Load Capacity: From 14.00 – up to 14.5 tons 1430.00 3.46 Load Capacity: From 14.5 – up to 15.00 tons 1760.00 4.26 Load Capacity: From 15.00 – up to 15.5 tons 2100.00 5.09 Load Capacity: From 15.5 – up to 16.0 tons 2400.00 5.81 Above 16.00 tons and higher 2400 AMD plus 45 AMD per each 500 kg per km Charges per km for truck with double axle exceeding load of 18 tons AMD USD Load Capacity: From 18 – up to 19 tons 265.00 0.64 Load Capacity: From 19 – up to 20 tons 380.00 0.92 Load Capacity: From 20 – up to 21 tons 430.00 1.04 Load Capacity: From 21 – up to 22 tons 700.00 1.70 Load Capacity: From 23 – up to 23 tons 925.00 2.24 Page 2 Load Capacity: From 23 – up to 24 tons 1190.00 2.88 Load Capacity: From 24 – up to 25 tons 1540.00 3.73 Load Capacity: From 25– up to 26 tons 1950.00 4.72 Above 26 tons, 2650 AMD plus 55 AMD per each 1000 kg per km Charges per km for truck with triple axel exceeding load of 22 tons AMD USD Load Capacity: From 22 – up to 22.5 tons 90.00 0.22 Load Capacity: From 22.5 – up to 23 tons 110.00 0.27 Load Capacity: From 23 – up to 24 tons 175.00 0.42 Load Capacity: From 24 – up to 25 tons 265.00 0.64 Load Capacity: From 25 – up to 26 tons 395.00 0.96 Load Capacity: From 26 – up to 27 tons 550.00 1.33 Load Capacity: From 27 – up to 28 tons 705.00 1.71 Load Capacity: From 28– up to 29 tons 880.00 2.13 Load Capacity: From 29 –up to30 tons 1080.00 2.62 Load Capacity: From 30 – up to31 tons 1300.00 3.15 Load Capacity: From 31 – up to 32 tons 1540.00 3.73 Load Capacity: From 32 – up to33 tons 1805.00 4.37 Load Capacity: From 33 – up to34 tons 2135.00 5.17 Load Capacity: From 34 – up to35 tons 2650.00 6.42 Above 35 tons and higher 2650 AMD plus 45 AMD per each 1000 kg per km NOTE: For trucks crossing border, these charges are paid at the border to the customs office or at final destination before goods are released. Axle load limits LCA Country Transit Country Truck with 2 axles 18,000 kg 10,000 kg Truck with 3 axles 22,000 kg 30,000 kg Truck with 4 axles 36,000 kg 40,000 kg Road Class and Surface Conditions According to local legislation (Nº 112 dated, 12th Jan, 2008) there are 3 types of roads in Armenia. They are interstate, republican and regional Classification Road Description Class: Interstate, code M1 RN From Yerevan– Gyumri – Gogavan, average width 8 mt Class: Interstate, code M2 RN From Yerevan– Goris – Meghri, average width 5 mt Class: Interstate, code M6 RN From Yerevan–Vanadzor – Sadakhlo, average width 5 mt Route Nationale (bitumen), Route Nationale (gravel), Route District (gravel), Unclassified Route, Urban Routes etc… Page 3.
Recommended publications
  • The World Bank Rural Infrastructure in Armenia
    30312 Public Disclosure Authorized The World Bank Rural Infrastructure in Armenia: Addressing Gaps in Service Delivery Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Infrastructure and Energy Services Department Europe and Central Asia Region 1st September 2004 FINAL REPORT: 1st September 2004 Disclaimer: This paper is published to communicate the results of the Bank’s work to the development community with minimum delay. The typescript of this paper, therefore, has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formal printed texts and the World Bank accepts no responsibility for errors. Some sources cited in this paper may be informal documents that are not readily available. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank cannot guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply on the part of the World Bank any judgment of the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. © 2004 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD), The World Bank. ii FINAL REPORT: 1st September 2004 CONTENTS Abbreviations And Acronyms vi Acknowledgments vii Overview and Summary of Recommendations 1 Introduction 5 Why did we do this Study?........................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents 1. Social Economic Background & Current Indicators of Syunik Region...........................2 2. Key Problems & Constraints .............................................................................................23 Objective Problems ...................................................................................................................23 Subjective Problems..................................................................................................................28 3. Assessment of Economic Resources & Potential ..............................................................32 Hydropower Generation............................................................................................................32 Tourism .....................................................................................................................................35 Electronics & Engineering ........................................................................................................44 Agriculture & Food Processing.................................................................................................47 Mineral Resources (other than copper & molybdenum)...........................................................52 Textiles......................................................................................................................................55 Infrastructures............................................................................................................................57
    [Show full text]
  • Development Project Ideas Goris, Tegh, Gorhayk, Meghri, Vayk
    Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development of the Republic of Armenia DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IDEAS GORIS, TEGH, GORHAYK, MEGHRI, VAYK, JERMUK, ZARITAP, URTSADZOR, NOYEMBERYAN, KOGHB, AYRUM, SARAPAT, AMASIA, ASHOTSK, ARPI Expert Team Varazdat Karapetyan Artyom Grigoryan Artak Dadoyan Gagik Muradyan GIZ Coordinator Armen Keshishyan September 2016 List of Acronyms MTAD Ministry of Territorial Administration and Development ATDF Armenian Territorial Development Fund GIZ German Technical Cooperation LoGoPro GIZ Local Government Programme LSG Local Self-government (bodies) (FY)MDP Five-year Municipal Development Plan PACA Participatory Assessment of Competitive Advantages RDF «Regional Development Foundation» Company LED Local economic development 2 Contents List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ 2 Contents ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Structure of the Report .............................................................................................................. 5 Preamble ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 9 Approaches to Project Implementation ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives
    WIND ENERGY IN ARMENIA: OVERVIEW OF POTENTIAL AND DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES ASSISTANCE TO ENERGY SECTOR TO STRENGTHEN ENERGY SECURITY AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONTRACT NUMBER EPP-I-08-03-00008-00 MARCH 2010 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by PA Government Services Inc. Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives ASSISTANCE TO ENERGY SECTOR TO STRENGTHEN ENERGY SECURITY AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONTRACT NUMBER EPP-I-08-03-00008-00 The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of Potential and Development Perspectives ASSISTANCE TO ENERGY SECTOR TO STRENGTHEN ENERGY SECURITY AND REGIONAL INTEGRATION CONTRACT NUMBER EPP-I-08-03-00008-00 March 2010 © PA Consulting Group 2010 Prepared for: United States Agency for PA Government Services Inc. International Development 4601 N. Fairfax Drive Armenia Mission Suite 600 1 American Ave. Arlington, VA 22203 Yerevan 0082 Armenia Prepared by: PA Government Services Inc. Tel: +1 571 227 9000 Fax: +1 571 227 9001 www.paconsulting.com Version: 1.0 Wind Energy in Armenia: Overview of potential and development perspectives. March 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Summary 1-1 2. Introduction 2-1 2.1 International Trends 2-1 2.2 State of the energy sector in Armenia 2-3 3. Wind Studies 3-1 4. Wind Measurements 4-1 5. Wind Energy Potential 5-1 6. Development perspectives 6-1 6.1 Technical limitations 6-1 6.2 Perspective Sites 6-3 6.3 Grid Interconnection 6-8 6.4 Economic Limitations 6-11 7.
    [Show full text]
  • PEOPLE in NEED ARMENIA NEWSLETTER #5: JUNE 2020 – AUGUST 2020 | Armenia.Peopleinneed.Global
    PEOPLE IN NEED ARMENIA NEWSLETTER #5: JUNE 2020 – AUGUST 2020 | armenia.peopleinneed.global Presenting the hosts of the Legends Trail These businesses were established with support from the EU4Tourism project Tea & Chat Room The Tea & Chat Room is located along the Legends Trail in Tatev. Visitors and locals can enjoy chatting, playing games, and drinking tea in a pleasant environment. There are plans to stage a variety of classes and events once the epidemiological situation permits. Ttenut Ttenut is one of the businesses established on the Legends Trail in Karahunj, Goris. It offers a camping zone, food, mulberry workshops, and other services. Shahnazar Adventure Campsite The Shahnazar Adventure Campsite is situated in Hartashen, close to Goris, and offers hiking, camping, horseback riding, fishing, birdwatching, bonfires, and tours to abandoned villages nearby. Khustup Guest House The Khustup Guest House, based along the Legends Trail in Verin Vachagan, is a bed and breakfast offering a variety of adventure tours in the Kapan area. PEOPLE IN NEED ARMENIA Legends Trail E-bikes in Tandzaver Pegasus Tandzaver provides bike rentals, as well as electric and mountain bike tours to Tatev and to the settlements around Tatev. Restoration of the Legends Trail Our crew is working hard on the restoration of the Legends Trail. Thanks to our collaboration with the NGO Trails For Change and the Transcaucasian Trail, it will soon be easier to navigate the beautiful segment between Khndzoresk and Khustup. Hosting Travel Bloggers on the Legends Trail Travel bloggers Aram and Megan of Absolute Armenia recently explored the Legends Trail. They stayed at camping zones along the trail, and visited a number of the locations and businesses funded as part of the EU4Tourism project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Route to Mysterious Tatev It Is Said That the Master Who Built the Monastery, at the End of His Work, Asked to Bring Him Two Wood Chips
    STATE TOURISM COMMITTEE Ministry of Economic Development and Investments Republic of Armenia The Route to Mysterious Tatev It is said that the master who built the monastery, at the end of his work, asked to bring him two wood chips. Taking them he prayed to God and said: “ogni Surb ta tev”, which is translated from Armenian as: “May the Holy Spirit send down the wings.” After these words, he jumped into the abyss. In flight, the wings grew behind his back and he flew away, the monastery was named in honor of this miracle – Tatev, that means “give wings.” TRANSPORTATION GG GG Yerevan is the capital and largest city of Armenia. Yerevan The history of Yerevan dates back to the 8th century Start time 09:00 BC, with the founding of the fortress of Erebuni in 782 BC by King Argishti I at the western extreme of the Ararat plain. Areni-1 cave The Areni-1 winery is a 6100-year-old winery that was discovered in 2007 in the Areni-1 cave complex in the village of Areni in the Vayots Dzor province. The Areni-1 shoe was found in the same cave in 2008. WHERE TO EAT Areni-1 cave Harsnasar Restorant Complex, Areni Lchak Restaurant Complex, Arpi Here is our suggestion where you can take a break and taste the local food. Karahunj Observatory Zorats Karer is a prehistoric archaeological site near the town of Sisian. It is known as the Armenian Stonehenge. Goris 1 Goris is an old town of 25,000 characterized by the regionally representative architecture of the houses and its long tree-lined avenues.
    [Show full text]
  • Yerevan, ARMENIA (Via Zoom)
    UN EDUCATION SUB-WORKING GROUP MEETING MINUTES Wednesday, 18 November 2020 11:00 11:45 VENUE: Yerevan, ARMENIA (via Zoom) Participating organizations: 15 participants from UN agencies, international organizations and international/local NGOs (see – attached Participants list) attended the fourth meeting of the Education Sub-Working Group. Meeting agenda: • Updates on the dynamics of the movement of displaced population of NKunder the new reality and current situation in the shelters. • Updates on the activities in ensuring access and continuance of education of student spontaneously arrived from NKR; • Discussion on future actions. • UNICEF (Avlard Poghosyan, Maya Simonyan) o Informed, that by the end of the week the delivery of 3000 school bags with stationary items to the Government requested municipalities will be completed and the list of municipalities and the numbers of delivered kits will be shared with group members; o Besides school bags, on 19th of November 100 tablets will be delivered to Syunik marzpetaran for the distribution to school of Goris, Sisian and Kapan municipalities, who are hosting students from NK to support distance learning of students from NKR; o Informed group members, that considering the needs, 2000 new school kits will be procured for the distribution to marzpetarans; o Notified that, there is a contract with “Step by Step” foundation on the establishment of early learning corners in 11 shelters (the list of the shelters also will be shared with the group members for coordination of efforts); o On the
    [Show full text]
  • Breaking the Ice: the Role of Civil
    The failure of the 2009 Protocols to establish and develop diplomatic relations between Armenia and Turkey has largely overshadowed the success of civil society organizations in advancing the normalization process over the past decade. This report aims to help address this imbalance through a detailed account Breaking the Ice: of the United States Department of State-funded “Dialogue-Building between Turkey and Armenia” project, implemented by the Global Political Trends Center (GPoT) of Istanbul Kültür University, Internews Network, Internews Armenia, the Yerevan Press Club and CAM Film between September 2010 and December 2011. The Role of Civil Society and Media in Including an introduction that analyzes the current “frozen” state and historical background of Turkish- Armenian relations, Breaking the Ice: The Role of Civil Society and Media in Turkey-Armenia Relations presents the writings and reflections of the dozens of Turkish and Armenian journalists and students who participated in the project. The output of the Dialogue-Building Project demonstrates the continued, if not Turkey-Armenia Relations heightened, importance of civil society and media-based initiatives in the Turkey-Armenia normalization process, post-Protocols. Susae Elanchenny & Narod Maraşlıyan Since its founding in 2008, GPoT Center has played an active role in rapprochement and reconciliation projects between Turkey and Armenia through organizing numerous exchanges, roundtable discussions and conferences with the participation of leading Turkish civil society activists, academics, journalists and retired diplomats. For more information on these projects and GPoT Center, please visit www.gpotcenter.org. ISBN: 978-605-4233-80-9 Breaking the Ice: The Role of Civil Society and Media in Turkey-Armenia Relations An Evaluation of the “Dialogue-Building between Turkey and Armenia” Project Susae Elanchenny & Narod Maraşlıyan April 2012 BREAKING THE ICE: THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOcietY anD MEDia IN TUrkeY-Armenia RELatiOns Istanbul Kültür University Publication No.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: PIDC14759 Public Disclosure Authorized Project Name Local Economy and Infrastructure Development Project (P150327) Region EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA Country Armenia Public Disclosure Copy Sector(s) Sub-national government administration (20%), SME Finance (10%), Rural and Inter-Urban Roads and Highways (35%), General water, sani tation and flood protection sector (35%) Theme(s) Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise support (10%), Cultural Heritage (20%), Urban Economic Development (25%), City-wide Infrastructur e and Service Delivery (35%), Infrastructure services for private sector development (10%) Lending Instrument Investment Project Financing Public Disclosure Authorized Project ID P150327 Borrower(s) Ministry of Finance Implementing Agency Development Foundation of Armenia Environmental B-Partial Assessment Category Date PID Prepared/ 23-Mar-2015 Updated Date PID Approved/ 26-Mar-2015 Disclosed Public Disclosure Authorized Estimated Date of 14-Sep-2015 Appraisal Completion Estimated Date of 22-Oct-2015 Board Approval Public Disclosure Copy Concept Review Track II - The review did authorize the preparation to continue Decision I. Introduction and Context Country Context Armenia is a small (29,800 km2), landlocked lower-middle income country with a population of about 3 million, with a large diaspora population of around 7 million, and an average per capita Gross National Income (GNI) of US$3,720 in 2012. In the decade preceding the global economic and financial crisis, real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth was more than 10 percent, strongly Public Disclosure Authorized fueled by remittances. In 2009, there was a substantial contraction. Growth has since resumed, although at a slower pace, reaching 4.7 percent in 2011 and 7.2 percent in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • PTA2- Goris Urban Streets Rehabilitation
    Community-led Urban Strategies in Historic Towns (COMUS) Goris Urban Streets Rehabilitation Preliminary Technical Assessment Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Executive Summary: the Site and its Management................................................................................................ 5 3. Administrative information ......................................................................................................................................... 6 4. Summary of condition ................................................................................................................................................. 7 5. Existing Information .................................................................................................................................................... 8 6. Scope of the PTA ....................................................................................................................................................... 11 7․ The PTA ...................................................................................................................................................................... 12 8. Documentation ........................................................................................................................................................... 15 9. Authors ........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: PAD1424 INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT APPRAISAL DOCUMENT ON A Public Disclosure Authorized PROPOSED LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$55 MILLION TO THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA FOR A LOCAL ECONOMY AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized December 1, 2015 Social, Urban, Rural and Resilience Global Practice EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without Public Disclosure Authorized World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective November 23, 2015) Currency Unit = AMD ADM 475 = US$1 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADB Asian Development Bank M&E Monitoring and Evaluation ADS Armenia Development Strategy MIS Management Information System ASA Air Service Agreements MNA Middle East and North Africa ASIF Armenia Social Investment Fund MoC Ministry of Culture ATDF Armenian Territorial Development Fund MoE Ministry of Economy B&B Bread and Breakfast MoNP Ministry of Nature Protection Ministry of Territorial Administration BP Bank Policy MoTA&ES and Emergency Situations MOUD Ministry of Urban Development CBA Cost Benefit Analysis NCB National Competitive Bidding National Competitiveness Foundation CER Contingent Emergency Response NCFA of Armenia CIS Commonwealth of Independent States CNF Caucasus Nature Fund
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia USAID Trip Report Food Safety Marcy Neilan
    Office of International Rresearch Education and Development Virginia Tech 526 Price’s Fork Road (0378) Blacksburg, VA 24061 Phone: (540) 231-1875 [email protected] http://www.oired.vt.edu/innovate/ Trip Report: InnovATE/Armenia Dates: June 26 to July 11 for Joe Marcy June 26 to July 19 for Angela Neilan Institution(s): Virginia Tech, ICARE and ATC Purpose: Assessment of Food Safety Systems and Processing Plant Implementation of Best Food Science Based Practices in order to develop new Specialty for ATC students in Food Safety Management. Sites Visited: Yerevan- Ministry of Food Safety Systems and FAO Food Testing Laboratories, Armenian National Agrarian University Department of Food Stuffs and laboratory facilities Visits to Food Production Facilities, farm and roadside food markets and CARD Farm and Vet Service Centers for Food Safety assessment: North of Yerevan- Sevan, Vanadzor, Stepanavan, Tashir, Spitak (1 day) South of Yerevan-Ararat, Yeghegnadzor Sissian, Goris, Khndzoresk (2 days) Description of Activities: Observed and assessed value chain for food products such as fruit, vegetables and dairy cheese from farm to fork. Interviewed Food Processing industry owners and employees, government regulatory staff, Ministry of Food Safety Systems, CARD Farm and Vet center staff, CARD Food Safety staff, Suggestions and Recommendations: (see trip log for further explanations) ATC should collate and distribute the content and results of the July 1 Symposium on “Linkages between Industry and Academia” and follow up on action items Ensuring animal health is one of the most important phases in the food safety process. We recommend that the village and regional veterinarians be involved in the Food Safety Management curriculum development.
    [Show full text]