DOCSLIB.ORG

IEE of Preliminary Works for the Houay Soup Resettlement Area

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IEE of Preliminary Works for the Houay Soup Resettlement Area MAKO PROJECT Initial Environmental Examination of Preliminary Works for the Houay Soup Resettlement Area FINAL Prepared for By June 2015 IEE: Preliminary Access Works RECORD DISTRIBUTION Copy No. Company / Position Name 1 Director, ESD NNP1 Mr. Prapard PAN-ARAM 2 EMO Manager, NNP1 Mr Viengkeo Phetnavongxay 3 Deputy Compliance Manager, NNP1 Mr. Cliff Massey DOCUMENT REVISION LIST Revision Status/Number Revision Date Description of Revision Approved By Rev0 15 June 2015 Working Draft Nigel Murphy Rev1 18 June 2015 Draft Nigel Murphy Rev2 26 June 2015 Revised Draft Tom Callander Rev3 06 July 2015 Final Tom Callander This report is not to be used for purposes other than those for which it was intended. Environmental conditions change with time. The site conditions described in this report are based on observations made during the site visit and on subsequent monitoring results. Earth Systems does not imply that the site conditions described in this report are representative of past or future conditions. Where this report is to be made available, either in part or in its entirety, to a third party, Earth Systems reserves the right to review the information and documentation contained in the report and revisit and update findings, conclusions and recommendations. FINAL i i IEE: Preliminary Access Works Contents 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................... 1 0.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 0.2 Key Findings .............................................................................................................. 1 0.3 Key Recommendations .............................................................................................. 2 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Objectives and Scope of the IEE ............................................................................... 3 1.3 HSRA Preliminary Works Developer and IEE Consultant ........................................... 4 1.3.1 Nam Ngiep 1 Power Company ......................................................................... 4 1.3.2 Contractors ...................................................................................................... 4 1.3.3 Earth Systems ................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Methodology .............................................................................................................. 4 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE HSRA PRELIMINARY WORKS ..................................... 7 2.1 HSRA Preliminary Works Location ............................................................................. 7 2.2 HSRA Preliminary Works Description ........................................................................ 7 2.3 HSRA Preliminary Works Design ............................................................................... 8 2.3.1 Design Characteristics ..................................................................................... 8 2.4 HSRA Preliminary Works Schedule ........................................................................... 9 2.5 HSRA Preliminary Works Alternatives ...................................................................... 12 2.5.1 Alternative Access Route ............................................................................... 12 2.5.2 No Project Alternative .................................................................................... 12 3 DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT ........................................................... 13 3.1 Physical Components .............................................................................................. 13 3.1.1 Atmosphere and Climate ............................................................................... 13 3.1.2 Topography .................................................................................................... 13 3.1.3 Soils and Erosion ........................................................................................... 13 3.1.4 Hydrology ...................................................................................................... 13 3.1.5 Surface and Ground Water Quality ................................................................ 13 3.1.1 Protected Areas and Forests ......................................................................... 15 3.1.2 Vegetation / Habitat Types ............................................................................. 15 3.1.3 Land Use, Habitat Distribution and Quality..................................................... 18 FINAL i i IEE: Preliminary Access Works 3.1.4 Terrestrial Flora .............................................................................................. 22 3.1.5 Terrestrial Fauna ............................................................................................ 22 3.1.6 Aquatic Habitat .............................................................................................. 23 3.1.7 Aquatic Biology .............................................................................................. 23 3.2 Social and Cultural Components .............................................................................. 25 3.2.1 Communities .................................................................................................. 25 3.2.2 Land Resource Use ....................................................................................... 25 3.2.3 Forest Resource Use ..................................................................................... 26 3.2.4 Water Resource Use ...................................................................................... 26 3.2.5 Cultural Heritage ............................................................................................ 26 4 SCREENING OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES .......................................................................... 27 4.1 Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures ..................................................... 27 4.1.1 Terrestrial Biodiversity .................................................................................... 27 4.1.2 Invasive Vegetation ........................................................................................ 28 4.1.3 Hydrology ...................................................................................................... 28 4.1.4 Erosion and Sediment Transportation ............................................................ 29 4.1.5 Water Quality ................................................................................................. 29 4.1.6 Aquatic Habitat and Biology ........................................................................... 30 4.1.7 Hazardous and Non-hazardous Waste .......................................................... 31 4.1.8 Operation of the Barge .................................................................................. 32 4.1.9 Decommissioning of Temporary Infrastructure ............................................... 32 4.2 Social Impacts and Mitigation Measures .................................................................. 33 4.2.1 Loss of Land, Assets and Livelihoods ............................................................ 33 4.2.2 Access to the Right Bank and HSRA ............................................................. 33 4.2.3 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage ................................................................ 33 4.2.4 UXO............................................................................................................... 33 4.2.5 Noise and Air Quality and Vibration ................................................................ 34 4.2.6 Workforce ...................................................................................................... 34 5 INSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PLAN ................................................................................................................... 36 5.1 Institutional Arrangements ....................................................................................... 36 5.1.1 Environmental and Social Department (ESD) ................................................ 36 FINAL ii IEE: Preliminary Access Works 5.1.2 NN1PC Technical Department ....................................................................... 36 5.1.3 Other Monitoring Institutions .......................................................................... 36 5.2 Environmental and Social Management and Monitoring Plan-Construction Phase (ESMMP-CP) ........................................................................................................... 36 5.3 Management and Monitoring Program ..................................................................... 37 6 PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE ........................ 41 6.1 Objectives of Public Consultation and Disclosure .................................................... 41 6.2 Consultation Activities .............................................................................................. 41 6.2.1 Meeting with PONRE ..................................................................................... 41
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Germination and Salinity Tolerance of Seeds of Sixteen Fabaceae Species in Thailand for Reclamation of Salt-Affected Lands
    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 21, Number 5, May 2020 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 2188-2200 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d210547 Germination and salinity tolerance of seeds of sixteen Fabaceae species in Thailand for reclamation of salt-affected lands YONGKRIAT KU-OR1, NISA LEKSUNGNOEN1,2,♥, DAMRONGVUDHI ONWIMON3, PEERAPAT DOOMNIL1 1Department of Forest Biology, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University. 50 Phahonyothin Rd, Lat yao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand 2Center for Advanced Studies in Tropical Natural Resources, National Research University, Kasetsart University. 50 Phahonyothin Rd, Lat yao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand. ♥email: [email protected] 3Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University. 50 Phahonyothin Rd, Lat Yao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand. Manuscript received: 26 March 2020. Revision accepted: 24 April 2020. Abstract. Ku-Or Y, Leksungnoen N, Onwinom D, Doomnil P. 2020. Germination and salinity tolerance of seeds of sixteen Fabaceae species in Thailand for reclamation of salt-affected lands. Biodiversitas 21: 2188-2200. Over the years, areas affected by salinity have increased dramatically in Thailand, resulting in an urgent need for reclamation of salt-affected areas using salinity tolerant plant species. In this context, seed germination is an important process in plant reproduction and dispersion. This research aimed to study the ability of 16 fabaceous species to germinate and tolerate salt concentrations of at 6 different levels (concentration of sodium chloride solution, i.e., 0, 8, 16, 24, 32, and 40 dS m-1). The germination test was conducted daily for 30 days, and parameters such as germination percentage, germination speed, and germination synchrony were calculated. The electrical conductivity (EC50) was used to compare the salt-tolerant ability among the 16 species.
    [Show full text]
  • 41924-014: Biodiversity Status Report on 230
    Initial Environmental Examination Project Number: 41924-014 May 2015 Nam Ngiep 1 Hydropower Project (Lao People’s Democratic Republic) Biodiversity Status Report on 230 kV Transmission Line Construction Area (Dam Site to Tower 54) Prepared by Earth Systems on behalf of Nam Ngiep 1 Power Company Limited for the Asian Development Bank This report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. MAKO P‘OJECT Biodiversity Status Report on 230 kV Transmission Line Construction Area (Dam site to Tower 54) FINAL Prepared for By May 2015 Biodiversity Status Report RECORD DISTRIBUTION Copy No. Company / Position Name 1 Director, ESD NNP1 Mr. Prapard PAN-ARAM 2 EMO Manager, NNP1 Mr Viengkeo Phetnavongxay 3 Deputy Compliance Manager, NNP1 Mr. Cliff Massey DOCUMENT REVISION LIST Revision Status/Number Revision Date Description of Revision Approved By Rev0 22 nd April 2015 Working Draft Nigel Murphy Rev1 24 th April 2015 Draft Nigel Murphy Rev2 18 th May 2015 Draft Nigel Murphy Rev3 20 th May 2015 Final Nigel Murphy Rev4 28 th May 2015 Final (reformatted) Nigel Murphy Rev5 22 nd April 2015 Working Draft Nigel Murphy This report is not to be used for purposes other than those for which it was intended.
    [Show full text]
  • Nhbss 062 2D Vanwelzen
    NAT. HIST. BULL. SIAM SOC. 62 (2): 149–159, 2018 THE NEED TO PROTECT: A COMPARISON BETWEEN THREE PLANT DIVERSITY PLOTS IN NORTHEAST THAILAND Peter C. van Welzen 1, 2*, Machiel Visser 1, Nanthawan Suphunte 3, Sommanussa Saengrit 3 and Voradol Chamchumroon 3 ABSTRACT The plant species communities of single 1-ha plots in each of three protected areas in Northeast Thailand, Phu Langka National Park, Phu Phan National Park and Phu Wua Wildlife Sanctuary, all of which supported mature forest on similar substrata and in a similar elevational zone, were studied. All trees were tagged and inventoried. The communities of the three sites differed widely. Of 168 species detected, most (147 spp.) were found on no more than one of the three plots. Only one species was common to all three plots. Biodiversity conservation under a scenario of changing climate will therefore be best served by conserving as large a number of protected areas as feasible, and ensuring connectivity among them so as to facilitate dispersal among sites. Keywords: biodiversity, Northeast Thailand, plot study, protection, species conservation INTRODUCTION The distributions of plants in Thailand are mainly known as maps with a few dots based on the collecting localities noted on the labels of herbarium specimens. A technique that has become popular recently, Species Distribution Modelling (SDM), provides a model of where species might occur by calculating chances based on the abiotic climate and soil conditions present in the places where the species were collected. The abiotic climate variables are related to precipitation and temperature. As such, one can calculate their values likely in the future based on climate models (soil conditions will roughly remain the same).
    [Show full text]
  • 41924-014: 230 Kv Transmission Line Realignment
    Initial Environmental Examination Project Number: 41924-014 May 2015 Nam Ngiep 1 Hydropower Project (Lao People’s Democratic Republic) IEE Addendum: 230 kV Transmission Line Realignment (Tower 54 to Tower 86) Prepared by Earth Systems on behalf of Nam Ngiep 1 Power Company Limited for the Asian Development Bank This report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. MAKO P‘OJECT IEE Addendum: 230 kV Transmission Line Realignment (Tower 54 to Tower 86) FINAL Prepared for By May 2015 IEE Addendum RECORD DISTRIBUTION Copy No. Company / Position Name 1 Director, ESD NNP1 Mr. Prapard PAN-ARAM 2 EMO Manager, NNP1 Mr Viengkeo Phetnavongxay 3 Deputy Compliance Manager, NNP1 Mr. Cliff Massey DOCUMENT REVISION LIST Revision Status/Number Revision Date Description of Revision Approved By Rev0 22 nd April 2015 Working Draft Nigel Murphy Rev1 24 th April 2015 Draft Nigel Murphy Rev2 18 th May 2015 Draft Nigel Murphy Rev3 20 th May 2015 Final Nigel Murphy Rev4 28 th May 2015 Final (reformatted) Nigel Murphy This report is not to be used for purposes other than those for which it was intended.
    [Show full text]
  • Diet of Phayre's Leaf-Monkey in the Phu Khieo Wildlife
    2 Asian Primates Journal 3(1), 2013 DIET OF PHAYRE’S LEAF-MONKEY IN THE PHU KHIEO WILDLIFE SANCTUARY, THAILAND Scott A. Suarez Department of Anthropology, Upham 120, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Trachypithecus is reported to rely more on leaves, and predicted to eat more mature leaves, than other Asian colobines. I therefore predicted that leaves should dominate the diet of Phayre’s Leaf-monkeys Trachypithecus phayrei (Blyth). To test this, I conducted five 20-minute focal samples each month (June 2004 to May 2005) for all adult monkeys in three social groups (N=23), with instantaneous sampling of behavior at one-minute intervals (N=24,439). Based on feeding time, the percentage of instantaneous samples within each dietary category, leaves were the dominant food item (46.2%) as predicted, with young leaves (31.3%) eaten more than mature leaves (12.4%). Fruit represented 39.5% of the diet, with monkeys consuming seeds and pulp from immature fruits (23.9%) more than mature fruits (12.6%). Flowers comprised 8.9% of the diet, while bamboo shoots, insects, and other items represented less than 5%. Insects and bamboo shoots were important for a period of less than two months. Diet varied across the year, with immature fruits becoming important as immature leaves disappeared from the diet. Most food items came from 28 plant genera, many of which are consumed throughout the year. Trachypithecus phayrei consumed more mature leaves than reported for Presbytis and Nasalis, providing support for stronger adaptation to a leaf diet.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Composition, Distribution and Management of Trees in Paddy Fields in Central Laos
    Species composition, distribution and management of trees in paddy fields in central Laos 京都大学 / アジア・アフリカ地域研究研究科 / 博士課程 小坂 康之 富士ゼロックス 小林節太郎記念基金 小林フェローシップ 2005 年度研究助成論文 謝 辞 本論文は、2006年3月に京都大学大学院アジア・アフリカ地域研究研究科に提出された博士論文の一 部を抜粋・改変したものである。 本論文を執筆するにあたり、京都大学大学院アジア・アフリカ地域研究研究科の竹田晋也助教授、 岩田明久助教授、小林繁男教授、京都大学地域研究統合情報センターの田中耕司教授には、原稿に対 する貴重なコメントのみならず、私が大学院に入学して以来今日にいたるまで日々ご指導ご教示いた だいた。また私が修士課程の学生の頃、古川久雄名誉教授（当時、京都大学大学院アジア・アフリカ 地域研究研究科教授）とラオスの農村で行ったフィールド調査の思い出は、本論文を仕上げる際に直 面した数々の困難を乗り越えるための力強い励ましとなった。 本研究を遂行するにあたり、京都大学大学院アジア・アフリカ地域研究研究科の平松幸三教授、鈴 木玲治助手、生方史数博士、嶋村鉄也博士、山口哲由博士、Mr. Souksompong Prixar、Mr. Anoulom Vilayphone、Mr. Soulaphone Inthavong、京都大学東南アジア研究所の安藤和雄助教授、柳澤雅之助 教授、富田晋介博士、京都学園大学の石田紀郎教授、大西信弘助教授からも、ご助言や励ましのお言 葉をいただいた。 さらに、京都大学東南アジア研究所の虫明悦生氏、京都大学アジア・アフリカ地域研究研究科の増 原善之氏、木口由香氏、ラオス国立大学林学部の先生や学生の方々には、2000年8月に初めてラオスを 訪問して以来、ラオスでの生活からフィールド調査の方法にいたるまで全てにわたってご教示いただ いた。 そして私の現地調査を受け入れ、温かく見守ってくださったサワンナケート県ドンマックンゲオ村、 バーク村、ナクー村の全ての方々、サワンナケート県農林局の皆様にお礼申し上げる。 最後に、本研究は、富士ゼロックス小林節太郎記念基金、21世紀COEプログラム「世界を先導する総 合的地域研究拠点の形成」の助成を受けて行われた。ここに記して、感謝の意を表したい。 2006年8月 小坂 康之 目 次 Chapter 1. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 Chapter 2. Site description and methods ..............................................................................................3 2-1. Site description .........................................................................................................................3 2-2. Data collection ..........................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • These Proceedings Contain the Presentations and Deliberations Ofth E First PROSEA International Symposium, Which Was Held from May 22-25,1989, in Jakarta, Indonesia
    These Proceedings contain the presentations and deliberations ofth e First PROSEA International Symposium, which was held from May 22-25,1989, in Jakarta, Indonesia. Focal points ofth e presentations wereth e past, present and future ofth e PROSEA project, which is an international, multidisciplinary undertaking that aims to publish a multivolume, illustrated handbook in English, on approximately 5,000 useful South-East Asian plants. Yy <rV .%ävA-*|i* n^iv/ Kn A6 *Î\I-ÏÀ /)a<Pc^ O2 . ^ „ oi , Plant Resources of South-East Asia Proceedings of the First PROSEA International Symposium May 22-25,1989, Jakarta, Indonesia J.S. Siemonsma and N.Wulijarni-Soetjipt o (Editors) H Pudoc Wageningen 1989 c SU S~I o") S Bibliotheek TEELT Vakgroep Agronomie LU -Wag«ninge n Cip-Data Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Den Haag Plant Plant resources of South-East Asia :proceeding s of the first PROSEA interna­ tional symposium, May 22-25, 1989, Jakarta, Indonesia:J. S. Siemonsma and N. Wulijarni-Soetjipto (ed.).- Wageningen : Pudoc. - III. With ref. ISBN 90-220-0999-8 bound SISO 632.3UD C 633/635 (59) NUGI835 Subject heading: plant resources ;South-Eas t Asia. ISBN 90-220-0999-8 NUGI 835 Design: Frits Stoepman GVN. © Pudoc/Prosea, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 1989 No part of this publication, apart from bibliographic data and brief quotations embodied in critical reviews, may be reproduced, re-recorded or published in any form including print, photocopy, microfilm, electric or electromagnetic record without permission from the publisher Pudoc, P.O. Box 4, 6700 AA
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Survey at Danang Airport
    ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION AT DANANG AIRPORT CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT Biodiversity Survey at Danang Airport NOVEMBER 14, 2012 1 This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). It was prepared by Hatfield Consultants (Hatfield) and Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST), on behalf of CDM International, Inc. (CDM Smith) Environmental Remediation at Danang Airport Construction Management and Oversight Biodiversity Survey at Danang Airport Prepared by: Dr. Le Xuan Canh, Director of Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST) and Hatfield Consultants (Hatfield), on behalf of CDM International, Inc. (CDM Smith) Submitted to: Jamey Watt, United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) USAID Contract No.: AID-EDH-1-00-08-00023 USAID Order No.: AID-486-TO-12-00001 Report Date: November 14, 2012 CONTENTS SECTION 1 – BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE ................................................................. 1-1 SECTION 2 – SCOPE OF WORK ............................................................................................ 2-1 SECTION 3 – STUDY TIME, LOCATION, AND METHODS .............................................. 3-1 3.1 Study Time and Location .......................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Survey .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Labelled and Other Important Trees and Lianas in Cát Tiên National Park (Checklist and Higher Taxonomy of Trees, Lianas and Larger Plants) V.2 Update: 18 August 2021
    Labelled and other important trees and lianas in Cát Tiên National Park (Checklist and higher taxonomy of trees, lianas and larger plants) v.2 update: 18 August 2021 The purpose of this checklist is to provide an inventory, with higher taxonomy, of a majority of the labelled specimen trees and lianas found on the main roads, Botanic, Crocodile-lake trails and the Headquarters area. The Park's 2021 tree labelling initiative has enormously enhanced the scientific and educational value of the commonly-used trails. The number of names – more than 150 species of trees and lianas (woody vines) - can be bewildering to non-specialists: the word "diversity" is commonly used, but with it comes complexity. How best to dissect the problem? Botanists tend to place species in families (Họ), but there are still some 45 names to learn here; to make this more manageable, families can be grouped into (say a dozen) orders (Bộ), easier to cope-with. Up-to-date species names will help visitors obtain further information online – but please be careful to spell them correctly! The original, official Park species list was prepared in 2002 (by Prof. Phạm Hoàng Hộ, author of the definitive work Cây Cỏ Việt Nam). However since then, plant taxonomy has been revised substantially by the international Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG), with whole plant families promoted, demoted or moved to different orders. Furthermore, genera and species have been – and continue to be - revised in light of scientific evidence; this also can be confusing for non-botanists. Two important families, the Fabaceae and Malvaceae have undergone substantial revision, sometimes with reorganisation into new subfamily names (indicated in blue).
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodian Journal of Natural History
    Cambodian Journal of Natural History New orchid records Ethnobotanical knowledge Carbon stocks and dynamics A homage to Pauline Dy Phon National Biodiversity Action Plan Movement of Siamese crocodiles Payments for Ecosystem Services Camera trapping of large mammals June 2017 Vol. 2017 No. 1 Cambodian Journal of Natural History Editors Email: [email protected] • Dr Neil M. Furey, Chief Editor, Fauna & Flora International, Cambodia. • Dr Jenny C. Daltry, Senior Conservation Biologist, Fauna & Flora International, UK. • Dr Nicholas J. Souter, Mekong Case Study Manager, Conservation International, Cambodia. • Dr Ith Saveng, Project Manager, University Capacity Building Project, Fauna & Flora International, Cambodia. International Editorial Board • Dr Stephen J. Browne, Fauna & Flora International, • Dr Sovanmoly Hul, Muséum National d’Histoire U.K. Naturelle, France. • Dr Martin Fisher, Editor of Oryx – The International • Dr Andy L. Maxwell, World Wide Fund for Nature, Journal of Conservation, U.K. Cambodia. • Dr L. Lee Grismer, La Sierra University, California, • Dr Brad Pett itt , Murdoch University, Australia. USA. • Dr Campbell O. Webb, Harvard University Herbaria, • Dr Knud E. Heller, Nykøbing Falster Zoo, Denmark. USA. Other peer reviewers • Prof. Henrik Balslev, Aarhus University, Denmark. • Dr Le Phat Quoi, Institute for Environment and Natural Resources, Ho Chi Minh National University, Vietnam. • Dr Chou Ly, Virginia Tech, USA. • Dr Benjamin Rawson, World Wide Fund For Nature, • Dr J.W. Duckworth, IUCN SSC Asian Species Action Vietnam. Partnership, UK. • Dr Sasaki Nophea, Asian Institute of Technology, • Jonathan Eames, BirdLife International Cambodia Thailand. Programme. • Dr André Schuiteman, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, • Dr Tracy Farrell, Conservation International, Cambodia. UK. • Paul Herbertson, Fauna & Flora International, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S1. Medicinal Plants Used by Four Phu Tai Healers in Roi Et Province, Thailand
    Table S1. Medicinal plants used by four Phu Tai healers in Roi Et province, Thailand. No. Species (Auemporn Junsongduang Family Local name Symptoms and Preparation Life forms Source of UV Vourcher no.) Ailments treated and status Medicinal (Part used) plant 1 Acalypha indica L. (AJ-58) Euphorbiaceae Tam yae maeo Tuberculosis (L), Decoction H Community 0.50 Asthma (R) forest 2 Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl (AJ-59) Acanthaceae Ngueak pla mo Diabetes (S) Decoction Shr Protected 0.25 forest 3 Acronychia pedunculata (L.) Miq. Rutaceae Ka uam Headache (S) Decoction Shr Community 0.50 (AJ-105) forest 4 Apocynaceae Som lom Fever (R) Decoction C Home 0.25 Aganonerion polymorphum Spire garden (AJ-187) 5 Agave sisalana Perrine (AJ-60) Asparagaceae Pan son na rai Swelling (R) Decoction ExShr Home 0.25 garden 6 Allium sativum L. (AJ-106) Amaryllidaceae Kra thiam Hemorrhoids (L) Mashed and ExH Home 0.25 applied to skin garden 7 Alpinia galanga (L.) Willd. (AJ-188) Zingiberaceae Kha Flatulence (R) Eaten as food H Community 0.25 forest 8 Zingiberaceae Kha Khom Muscle pain (Sh), Decoction H Community 0.75 Alpinia zerumbet (Pers.) B.L.Burtt & Flatulence (Sh) forest, R.M.Sm. (AJ-61) Protected forest 9 Apocynaceae Khruea sai tan Urination difficulty Decoction C Community 0.25 Amphineurion marginatum (Roxb.) (S) forest D.J.Middleton (AJ-107) 10 Anacardium occidentale L. (AJ-186) Anacardiaceae Ma muang him Diarrhea (S) Decoction ExT Home 0.25 ma phan garden 11 Bromeliaceae Mak nut Leucorrhea (R), Decoction ExH Home 0.50 Ananas bracteatus (Lindl.) Schult. & Urination difficulty garden Schult.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Use and Trade of Plants and Animals in Traditional Medicine Systems in Cambodia
    AN OVERVIEW OF THE USE AND TRADE OF PLANTS AND ANIMALS IN TRADITIONAL MEDICINE SYSTEMS IN CAMBODIA David Ashwell Naomi Walston A TRAFFIC SOUTHEAST ASIA REPORT An overview of the use and trade of plants and animals in traditional medicine systems in Cambodia 2 Published by TRAFFIC Southeast Asia, Greater Mekong Programme, Ha Noi, Viet Nam © 2008 TRAFFIC Southeast Asia, Greater Mekong Programme, Ha Noi, Viet Nam All rights reserved. All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be reproduced with permission. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must credit TRAFFIC Southeast Asia, Greater Mekong Programme as the copyright owner. The views of the authors expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC network, WWF or IUCN. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership is held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint programme of WWF and IUCN. Suggested citation: Ashwell, D. and Walston, N. (2008). An overview of the use and trade of plants and animals in traditional medicine systems in Cambodia. TRAFFIC Southeast Asia, Greater Mekong Programme, Ha Noi, Viet Nam. Written by: David Ashwell and Naomi Walston Edited by: Geoff Morris Cover photo: Mark Bezuijen AN OVERVIEW OF THE USE AND TRADE OF PLANTS AND ANIMALS IN TRADITIONAL MEDICINE SYSTEMS IN CAMBODIA By Naomi Walston and David Ashwell A TRAFFIC SOUTHEAST ASIA REPORT © Mark Bezuijen © Mark Bezuijen Forest products on sale at a Cambodian market TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]