Grands Discours Parlementaires

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Grands Discours Parlementaires Grands discours parlementaires http://philosophie.ac-creteil.fr/spip.php?article1134 Grands discours parlementaires - Humanités, Littérature et Philosophie. Classes de Terminales. - Eloquence et argumentation - Date de mise en ligne : jeudi 24 septembre 2020 Copyright © La philosophie dans l'Académie de Créteil - Tous droits réservés Copyright © La philosophie dans l'Académie de Créteil Page 1/6 Grands discours parlementaires GRANDS MOMENTS D'ÉLOQUENCE PARLEMENTAIRE Révolution française • Sieyès, Mirabeau, Bergasse (15, 16 et 17 juin 1789) : Le tiers état se constitue en Assemblée nationale • Le roi et le comte de Mirabeau (23 juin 1789) : Résistance de l'Assemblée nationale à la volonté du roi • Barnave, Mirabeau (16 juillet 1789) : Débat sur la responsabilité ministérielle • Comte de Castellane, Barnave, Malouet (1er août 1789) : Discours sur la Déclaration des droits de l'homme et du Citoyen • Target, Noailles, Aiguillon (nuit du 4 août 1789) : Abolition des droits féodaux • Robespierre (1790) : Le marc d'argent • Mirabeau (1790) : Éloge funèbre de Benjamin Franklin • Mirabeau (1790) : Le drapeau tricolore • Barnave (1791) : L'inviolabilité royale, la séparation des pouvoirs et la terminaison de la Révolution française • Robespierre (1791) : Le suffrage universel • Condorcet (1792) : L'organisation générale de l'instruction publique • Danton (1792) : « De l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace » • Robespierre (1793) : Gouverner la République • Saint-Just (1793) : L'art militaire de la Nation et la bureaucratie • L'abbé Grégoire (1794) : Rapport sur les destructions opérées par le Vandalisme et les moyens de le réprimer • L'abbé Grégoire (1794) : L'unité de langue • Robespierre (1794) : ultime discours (séance du 8 thermidor) • Boissy d'Anglas (1795) : Liberté des cultes Restauration • François-René de Chateaubriand (1823) : « La réconciliation complète des Français s'achèvera sous la tente » Copyright © La philosophie dans l'Académie de Créteil Page 2/6 Grands discours parlementaires • François Guizot (1830) : « L'esprit d'insurrection est un esprit radicalement contraire à la liberté » Monarchie de Juillet • Odilon Barrot (1831) : « L'élément démocratique » • Alphonse de Lamartine (1838) : « La peine de mort d'une part ne réprime ou ne prévient pas le meurtre, et de l'autre part accroît les dangers de la société en entretenant la férocité des moeurs » • Alphonse de Lamartine (1838) : L'étatisation des chemins de fer • Dominique Arago (1840) : Le droit de vote au rang des droits naturels • Alexis de Tocqueville (1848) : « Je crois que nous nous endormons sur un volcan » Révolution de 1848 et Deuxième République • Hippolyte Detours : L'inviolabilité du suffrage universel • Louis Blanc : La création d'un ministère du progrès et du travail • Paul Rabuan : L'abolition complète de la peine de mort • Alphonse de Lamartine : Le droit au travail • Alphonse de Lamartine : L'élection du Président de la République au suffrage universel • Victor Hugo : La liberté de la presse • Victor Hugo : L'abolition de la peine de mort • Agricol Perdiguier : Le maintien de la limitation des horaires de travail • Pierre-Joseph Proudhon : « Ou la propriété emportera la République, ou la République emportera la propriété » • Pierre Leroux : Limiter la durée journalière de travail • Ledru-Rollin : Le droit au travail • Victor Hugo (1849) : « Détruire la misère » • Victor Hugo (1850) : Le suffrage universel Copyright © La philosophie dans l'Académie de Créteil Page 3/6 Grands discours parlementaires [Jean Jaurès à la tribune] Jean Jaurès à la tribune René Rousseau-Decelle, début du XXe siècle © Assemblée nationale Troisième République • Léon Gambetta (1870) : Contre le plébiscite • Victor Hugo (1871) : Contre l'invalidation de Garibaldi • Léon Gambetta (1880) : « Il n'y a qu'une France et qu'une République » • Paul Bert (1880) : Le principe de laïcité appliqué à l'enseignement primaire obligatoire • Albert de Mun (1884) : La nécessité de la loi sociale • Jules Ferry (1885) : Les fondements de la politique coloniale • Georges Clemenceau (1885) : La colonisation est-elle un devoir de civilisation ? • Jules Ferry (1889) : L'école laïque • Georges Clemenceau (1891) : « La Révolution est un bloc » • Georges Clemenceau (1891) : « Il y a quelque part, sur le pavé de Fourmies, une tache de sang innocent qu'il faut laver à tout prix ! » • Jean Jaurès (1893) : L'émancipation sociale des travailleurs • Jean Jaurès (1905) : « C'est dans le prolétariat que le verbe de la France se fait chair » • Aristide Briand (1905) : Présentation du projet de séparation des Églises et de l'État • René Viviani (1906) : La création d'un ministère du travail • Francis de Pressensé (1906) : Réintégration du capitaine Dreyfus et du colonel Picquart • Marcel Sembat (1912) : « La liberté d'être cubiste » • Jean Jaurès (1913) : Contre la loi des trois ans • Georges Clemenceau (1918) : « Je fais la guerre » • Édouard Herriot (1924) : Le programme du Gouvernement républicain • Léon Blum (1936) : « Nous sommes un Gouvernement de Front populaire » Assemblée consultative provisoire Copyright © La philosophie dans l'Académie de Créteil Page 4/6 Grands discours parlementaires • Général de Gaulle (1945) : « La victoire est aux dimensions de la guerre » Première Assemblée constituante • Général de Gaulle (1945) : Présentation du Gouvernement d'unité nationale • Général de Gaulle (1945) : Déclarations à l'Assemblée constituante (débat sur les crédits de la défense nationale) Quatrième République • René Capitant (1947) : Il faut retourner à l'électeur et le consulter avec une loi électorale nouvelle, comportant un scrutin majoritaire • Pierre Mendès France (1951) : « Pour une solution négociée en Indochine » • Pierre-Henri Teitgen (1952) : Réponses aux attaques de Charles Maurras contre la Résistance • Pierre Mendès France (1953) : « Gouverner c'est choisir » • Pierre Mendès France (1954) : Cessation des hostilités en Indochine • Léopold Sédar Senghor (1957) : « Je vous dis que la France est un arbre vivant » • Maurice Faure (1957) : Ratification des traités de Rome • Général de Gaulle (1958) : Discours d'investiture • François Mitterrand (1958) : Réponse au discours d'investiture du général de Gaulle Copyright © La philosophie dans l'Académie de Créteil Page 5/6 Grands discours parlementaires Cinquième République • Michel Debré (1959) : Les principes des nouvelles institutions • Michel Debré (1959) : L'aide à l'enseignement privé • Paul Reynaud, Georges Pompidou (1962) : Débat de censure • André Malraux (1966) : Présentation du budget de la culture à l'Assemblée nationale • André Malraux (1966) : La création des Paravents de Jean Genet à l'Odéon - Théâtre de France • Jacques Chaban-Delmas (1969) : « La nouvelle société » • Robert Badinter (1981) : « L'abolition de la peine de mort » • Jack Lang (1981) : « Un ministère de la culture, pour quoi faire ? » • Philippe Séguin (1992) : « Oui, nous voulons l'Europe, mais debout » Copyright © La philosophie dans l'Académie de Créteil Page 6/6.
Recommended publications
  • Class Struggles in France 1848-1850
    Karl Marx The Class Struggles in France, 1848-1850 Written: December January-October 1850; Published: as a booklet by Engels in 1895; Source: Selected Works, Volume 1, Progress Publishers, Moscow 1969; Proofed: and corrected by Matthew Carmody, 2009, Mark Harris 2010; Transcribed: by Louis Proyect. Table of Contents Introduction (Engels, 1895) ......................................................................................................... 1 Part I: The Defeat of June 1848 ................................................................................................. 15 Part II: From June 1848 to June 13, 1849 .................................................................................. 31 Part III: Consequences of June 13, 1849 ................................................................................... 50 Part IV: The Abolition of Universal Suffrage in 1850 .............................................................. 70 Introduction (Engels, 1895)1 The work republished here was Marx’s first attempt to explain a piece of contemporary history by means of his materialist conception, on the basis of the prevailing economic situation. In the Communist Manifesto, the theory was applied in broad outline to the whole of modern history; in the articles by Marx and myself in the Neue Rheinische Zeitung, it was constantly used to interpret political events of the day. Here, on the other hand, the question was to demonstrate the inner causal connection in the course of a development which extended over some years, a development
    [Show full text]
  • Louis-Napoléon and Mademoiselle De Montijo;
    CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Cornell University Library DC 276.132 1897 3 1924 028 266 959 Cornell University Library The original of tliis book is in tlie Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924028266959 LOUIS NAPOLEON AND MADEMOISELLE DE MONTIJO LOUIS NAPOLEON BONAPARTE President if the French Republic LOUIS NAPOLEON AND MADEMOISELLE DE MONTIJO BY IMBERT DE SAINT-AMAND TRANSLATED BY ELIZABETH GILBERT MARTIN WITH PORTRAITS NEW YORK CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS 1899 COPYRIGHT, 1897, BY CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS NotiDOOtI ^tttt }. a. Cuahing & Co. —Berwick k Smith NsiTOod Mill. U.S.A. CONTENTS CHAPTSB PASZ Intboduction 1 I. Tee Childhood OF Louis Napoleon 15 II. The !Fibst Restoration 28 in. The Hundred Days 39 rv. The First Years op Exile 50 V. Rome 62 VI. The Birth op the Empress 69 Vn. 1830 77 VIII. The Italian Movement 90 IX. The Insurrection op the Romagna 97 X. Ancona 107 XI. The Journey in Erance 115 Xn. Arenenbeko 128 Xin. Stbasburg 142 XIV. The Childhood op the Empress 154 XV. The " Andromeda " 161 XVI. New York 170 V Vi CONTENTS OHAPTEE PAGB XVII. Some Days in London 179 XVIII. The Death op Queen Hoktensb 187 XIX. A Year IN Switzerland 197 XX. Two Years in England 211 XXI. Boulogne 222 XXn. The Conciehgerie 233 XXm. The Court OP Peers 240 XXIV. The Fortress op Ham 247 XXV. The Letters prom Ham 261 XXVI. The Prisoner's Writings 274 XXVII. The End op the Captivity 281 XXVIIL The Escape 292 XXIX.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revolution of 1848 in the History of French Republicanism Samuel Hayat
    The Revolution of 1848 in the History of French Republicanism Samuel Hayat To cite this version: Samuel Hayat. The Revolution of 1848 in the History of French Republicanism. History of Political Thought, Imprint Academic, 2015, 36 (2), pp.331-353. halshs-02068260 HAL Id: halshs-02068260 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02068260 Submitted on 14 Mar 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. History of Political Thought, vol. 36, n° 2, p. 331-353 PREPRINT. FINAL VERSION AVAILABLE ONLINE https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/imp/hpt/2015/00000036/00000002/art00006 The Revolution of 1848 in the History of French Republicanism Samuel Hayat Abstract: The revolution of February 1848 was a major landmark in the history of republicanism in France. During the July monarchy, republicans were in favour of both universal suffrage and direct popular participation. But during the first months of the new republican regime, these principles collided, putting republicans to the test, bringing forth two conceptions of republicanism – moderate and democratic-social. After the failure of the June insurrection, the former prevailed. During the drafting of the Constitution, moderate republicanism was defined in opposition to socialism and unchecked popular participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Appendix
    BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX Aberdeen George Hamilton-Gordon, earl of (1784–1860), was the Foreign Secretary under Robert Peel 1841–46 and a close friend of Guizot and of Princess Lieven. He acted as go- between for Louis-Philippe and the comte de Chambord in 1849–50. He was the Prime Minister of Great Britain in 1852–55. Affre Denis-Auguste (1793–1848) was the archbishop of Paris from 1840. He rallied to the Republic quickly in 1848 but was mortally wounded when he tried to parlay with insur- gents during the June Days. d’Agoult Marie (1805–76) published her Histoire de la Révolution de 1848 under the name of Daniel Stern. Arago François (1786–1853) was an astronomer and member of the Provisional Government and Executive Commission. Barante Prosper de (1782–1866) was a member of the Doctrinaires in the Restoration and prefect during the July Monarchy as well as ambassador in Turin and Saint Petersburg. Baroche Jules (1802–70) was the Minister of the Interior from March 1850, actively supported the electoral reform law of 31 May 1850. He resigned when Changarnier was dis- missed but was made Minister of Foreign Affairs in April 1851, only to resign in October in protest against the President’s attempt to revoke the law of 31 May. After the coup he became President of the Council of State. Barrot Odilon (1791–1873) was prefect of the Seine after the 1830 Revolution. He was leader of the Dynastic Opposition © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 299 C. Guyver, The Second French Republic 1848–1852, DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-59740-3 300 BIOGRAPHICAL APPENDIX during the July Monarchy, and his banquet campaign for reform of the electoral system helped trigger the February Revolution of 1848.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaux-Arts.Pdf
    PREFACE For more than two centuries, the Palais Bourbon and the Hôtell de Lassay have been at the heart of French political life. From the very moment the Council of Five Hundred moved there in 1798, the edifices lost their original residentiiaal function and became the seat of national sovereignty and the cradle of our Republican values. These ancient walls resonate with the grand voices which, togetther, have made France and which have shown us and continue to guide us along the patth of liberty and solidarity: Lamartine, Schœlcher, Hugo, Jaurès, Clemenceau, but also,, more recently, Robert Badinter or Simone Veil. These splendid buildings are also an extraordinary testtament to the architectural and artistic development of our country, from the Regency to the modern daay. The architect Jules de Joly, the painters Delacroix, Vernet, Pujol, Alechinsky, and JonOne, as well as the sculptor De Maria, have all left their indelible mark here. Their artistic interpretations speak to us of France, of the demands of democratic debate and of our collective capacity to overcome our divisions. These national palaces, brimming with history, are also, through the parliamentary sittings, the daily arena for the work of MPs, their assisttants and of the civil servants of the National Assembbly. The work of Parliament must be better known by all. More than ever, our Assembly, which is the expression of direct universal suffrage, mustt be the shared house of all French citizens. New technologies have enabled us to make huge steps in the field of transparency and the National Assembly will continue its efforts in this direction, in the same way as it wishes to allow its heritage to be accessible to all.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Society in the History of Ideas: the French Tradition
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics De Dijn, Annelien Working Paper Civil society in the history of ideas: The French tradition WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP IV 2007-401 Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: De Dijn, Annelien (2007) : Civil society in the history of ideas: The French tradition, WZB Discussion Paper, No. SP IV 2007-401, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/49606 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Veröffentlichungsreihe der Forschungsgruppe „Zivilgesellschaft, Citizenship und politische Mobilisierung in Europa“ ZKD Forschungsschwerpunkt Zivilgesellschaft, Konflikte und Demokratie ZCM Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung Annelien de Dijn Civil Society in the History of Ideas: The French Tradition Discussion Paper Nr.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolutionary Insurgency and Revolutionary Republicanism
    REVOLUTIONARY INSURGENCY AND REVOLUTIONARY REPUBLICANISM: ASPECTS OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTIONARY TRADITION FROM THE ADVENT OF THE JULY MONARCHY THROUGH THE REPRESSION OF THE PARIS COMMUNE SUBMITTED BY: DAVID A. SHAFER DEGREE: PhD COLLEGE: UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON ProQuest Number: 10045641 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10045641 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ABSTRACT During the greater part of the nineteenth century the French political, social and cultural landscapes continued to reverberate from the echoes of the French Revolution. On one level, the Revolution framed the parameters of political debate. However, on another level the Revolution represented the first time in French history when political activism appeared to open up boundless opportunities for effecting change. In large measure, this was due to the prominence of popular protest in the Revolution and its transformation after 1789. Popular protest was nothing new to France. In fact, it was ingrained in the popular mentalité as a response to grievances. That said, the scope of popular protest during the ancien régime tended to be quite limited and rarely transcended the immediate source of the dispute.
    [Show full text]
  • SARAH HOROWITZ FRIENDSHIP and POLITICS
    FRIENDSHIP and POLITICS IN POST-REVOLUTIONARY FRANCE SARAH HOROWITZ FRIENDSHIP and POLITICS in POST- REVOLUTIONARY FRANCE FRIENDSHIP and POLITICS in POST- REVOLUTIONARY FRANCE SARAH HOROWITZ The Pennsylvania State University Press University Park, Pennsylvania Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Horowitz, Sarah, 1978– author. Friendship and politics in post-revolutionary France / Sarah Horowitz. p. cm Summary: “Explores the place of friendship in helping French society and the political system recover from the upheaval of the Revolution. Examines the interdependence of public and private in post-revolutionary France, as well as the central role of women in political reconstruction”—Provided by publisher. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-271-06192-4 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Friendship—Political aspects—France—History—19th century. 2. France—Politics and government—19th century. 3. Political culture—France—History—19th century. 4. Politicians—France—Social life and customs—19th century. 5. Politicians—Social networks—France—History—19th century. 6. Women—Political activity—France—History—19th century. I. Title. dc252.h67 2013 306.20944'09034—dc23 2013027155 Copyright © 2013 The Pennsylvania State University All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Published by The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA 16802-1003 The Pennsylvania State University Press is a member of the Association of American University Presses. It is the policy of The Pennsylvania State University Press to use acid- free paper. Publications on uncoated stock satisfy the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Material, ansi z39.48–1992. This book is printed on paper that contains 30% post-consumer waste.
    [Show full text]
  • Honoré Daumier
    HonoréPolitical Caricaturist ofDaumier the Nineteenth Century An Exhibition of the Haggerty Museum of Art, Marquette University, February 13 - May 18, 2003 Honoré Daumier (1808-1879) [Jean-François-Polynice] Denjoy from Les Représentans Représentés (The Representatives Represented) series, 1848-49 Lithograph on newsprint, 14 3/8 x 9 1/2 in. (36.5 x 24.1 cm) Haggerty Museum of Art, Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Philip Pinsof, 00.301.1 Photo © Andrei Lovinescu Daumier T imeline 1808 1832 1852 Honoré-Victorin Daumier born February 26 in Daumier’s first caricature appears in La Bonaparte declares himself Emperor Napoleon III Marseilles to Cécile Catherine Philip and Jean- Caricature and he begins creating small grotesque establishing the Second Empire. Increased surveil- Baptiste Louis Daumier. busts of parliamentarians. Widespread political lance of the press. unrest leads to government control of the press. 1814 Daumier condemned to six months in prison for 1855 Napoleon abdicates the throne, April 8. his lithograph Gargantua; Philipon and Aubert Daumier leaves Paris for Valmondois. Restoration of the Bourbons. Louis XVIII grants a receive the same sentence for publishing this cari- constitutional charter. cature of Louis-Philippe. Le Charivari, a new daily 1860 illustrated with lithographs launched by Aubert and Daumier is fired from Le Charivari, but rehired in 1815 Philipon. 1863. Napoleon escapes exile on the Island of Elbe, March 1. Louis XVIII flees Paris and is briefly 1833 1862 replaced by Napoleon. Napoleon defeated at Daumier released from prison, January 27. Daumier begins producing lithographs for Le Waterloo, June 18. Return of Louis XVIII. Daumier Boulevard and working for Le Monde Illustré.
    [Show full text]
  • Revue D'histoire Du Xixe Siècle, 22 | 2001, « Autour De Décembre 1851 » [Online], Online Since 20 June 2005, Connection on 24 September 2020
    Revue d'histoire du XIXe siècle Société d'histoire de la révolution de 1848 et des révolutions du XIXe siècle 22 | 2001 Autour de Décembre 1851 Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/rh19/482 DOI: 10.4000/rh19.482 ISSN: 1777-5329 Publisher La Société de 1848 Printed version Date of publication: 1 June 2001 ISSN: 1265-1354 Electronic reference Raymond Huard (dir.), Revue d'histoire du XIXe siècle, 22 | 2001, « Autour de Décembre 1851 » [Online], Online since 20 June 2005, connection on 24 September 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/ rh19/482 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/rh19.482 This text was automatically generated on 24 September 2020. Tous droits réservés 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Ont collaboré à la production de ce numéro Le mot du président Avertissement de réédition À nos lecteurs Réédition de l'article paru dans 1848 - Revue des révolutions contemporaines, n° 189, décembre 1951 La Rédaction Articles Aspects de l’opinion et de la pratique du suffrage entre mai 1849 et décembre 1851 : le témoignage des élections partielles à l’Assemblée législative Raymond Huard Le 2 décembre 1851 dans le Finistère, un coup d'État évanescent ? Laurent Le Gall Décembre 1851 : faibles réactions en pays « rouge ». Le cas de la Saône-et-Loire Pierre Lévêque La célébration du coup d’État de 1851 : symbolique politique et politique des symboles Rémi Dalisson Le Deux décembre ou le sacre de l'Auteur : les usages politiques d'un lieu commun de l'écriture de l'histoire Olivier Le Trocquer Mémoire et tourisme. Les monuments provençaux de 1851 Maurice Agulhon Le coup d'État du 2 décembre 1851.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction There is, in many respects, a Tocqueville enigma. Why did Tocqueville write Democracy in America? The question might seem incongruous.1 In fact, it is the key to understanding both the work and the man. Today we know that America was not the sole subject of the book that Tocqueville published in two volumes in 1835 and 1840. America was merely the pretext for studying modern society and the woes of France. What is more, the author’s intention remains ambiguous and controversial, as does the precise scope of the book he had in mind. De- mocracy in America has become a world classic (especially in the United States, Italy, and France), yet anyone who reads it slowly and reflectively will notice that its careful prose incorporates a number of curious signs: the author never discloses his opinion straightaway but rather turns it over in his mind, modifies it, and on occasion contradicts himself.2 His position on 1 No one asks why Cézanne painted Mont Sainte-Victoire, because the masterpiece speaks for itself. 2 To the point that Jon Elster often finds his thought to be incorrigibly incoherent: seePolitical Psy- chology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993). Citations from De la démocratie en Amérique are from the 1981 Garnier-Flammarion edition, as follows: DA I, for the 1835 text, DA II, for the 1840 text, followed by a page number; citations to specific chapters take the formDA I.2.5, for example, to in- dicate the fifth chapter of book 2 of volume 1. English translations are taken from Arthur Goldhammer’s translation, published in one volume by the Library of America in 2004 (hereafter cited as AG).
    [Show full text]
  • PARIS in DECEMBER, 1851 1 AUTHOR's APPENDIX • 2Il TRANSLATORS' APPENDIX: 256 ALPHABETICAL INDEX 345
    PARIS IN DECEUBER, 1851, Oll, THE COUP D'ETAT OF NAPOLEON Ill BY EUGENE TENOT, EDITOll OF THE SIECl,E (PARIS) AND AUTHOR OF "LA PROVL'l'CE EN DECEl1BllE V!.n.'' TRANSLATED FROl'rt THE THIRTEENTH FRENCH EDITION, WITH :MANY ORIGINAL NOTES, BY S. W. ADAMS, AND A.H. BRANDON. NEW YORK: PUBLISHED BY HURD AND HOUGHTON. l'!C a milt {ll ge, 1.t £1Hts {ll e ;th:tu. 1870. /tJ, ¥19 Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1870, by SHBRl!AN W. ADAMS, in the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington. RIVERSIDE, OAllIBBIDGE: FRI!ITED BY H. 0, HOUGHTON AND COllIFANY, CONTENTS. -+­ PAGE TRANSLATORS' PREFACE V AUTHOR'S PREFACE vii ANALYSIS OF CHAPTERS xiii PARIS IN DECEMBER, 1851 1 AUTHOR'S APPENDIX • 2il TRANSLATORS' APPENDIX: 256 ALPHABETICAL INDEX 345 TRANSLATORS' PREFACE. -+­ THE work of which a translation is herewith respect­ fully submitted, was first published in Paris, in July 1868, since which time it has reached its fifteenth French edition. As the object of its author was to sup­ ply a long-needed, correct version of the acts of vio­ lence and unlawfulness whereby Louis Napoleon sup­ planted the Republic of France by the Empire of which he became the head; so the object of the translators has been, to give to the "plain, unvarnished tale'' a form and style which should make it intelligible and popular in the hands of American readers. It is for this rea­ son that they have added a copious appendix of histor­ ical, biographical, and explanatory notes.
    [Show full text]