DOCSLIB.ORG

View Into the Broader Issues Surrounding Claims; the Right Hon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View Into the Broader Issues Surrounding Claims; the Right Hon Wednesday Volume 498 28 October 2009 No. 132 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 28 October 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 267 28 OCTOBER 2009 268 Mr. Francis Maude (Horsham) (Con): The Minister House of Commons says that there was some concern about national security, but Sir Ian Johnston’s report makes it absolutely clear Wednesday 28 October 2009 that these leaks were only matters of “embarrassment” that were The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock “not…likely to undermine government’s effectiveness.” So why did a Cabinet Office director write to counter- terrorism asserting that there was PRAYERS “considerable damage to national security” from these stories and that [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] “the potential for future damage is significant”? Did the Cabinet Secretary, the Prime Minister or Ministers BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS know about this letter before it was sent, and was there any political pressure on civil servants to shut down RAF NIMROD MR2 AIRCRAFT XV230 those embarrassing stories? Resolved, That an humble Address be presented to Her Majesty, That Tessa Jowell: Neither report from Chief Inspector she will be graciously pleased to give directions that there be laid O’Connor nor from Sir Ian Johnston makes any claim before this House a Return of the Report, dated 28 October 2009, that the Cabinet Office exaggerated national security of the Independent Review into the broader issues surrounding claims; the right hon. Gentleman should be absolutely the loss of the RAF Nimrod MR2 Aircraft XV230 in Afghanistan clear about that. He will also know that there was no in 2006.—(Mr. Blizzard.) ministerial involvement in the decision to involve the police. Oral Answers to Questions Mr. Maude: But the report says explicitly that these were only matters of embarrassment that were not likely to undermine Government effectiveness. On 31 October, the Cabinet Office demanded a scoping DEFENCE exercise that then went into detail about the involvement of “members of the Conservative party”. Does the The Secretary of State was asked— Minister think it right that counter-terrorism officers were misled and used, in effect, to try to intimidate and Operation Miser suppress parliamentary opposition? Given that the Prime Minister himself made his political career as a conduit 1. Mr. Andrew Turner (Isle of Wight) (Con): What for a flood of civil service leaks, should he have been assessment she has made of the findings of Sir Ian arrested when he was a shadow Minister? Johnston’s review of the investigation of leaks from the Home Department under Operation Miser which relate Tessa Jowell: Let me deal with the substantive point to the actions of her Department. [295973] that the right hon. Gentleman makes. I reiterate that neither report drew the conclusion that the Cabinet The Minister for the Cabinet Office and for the Olympics, Office had over-reacted. His judgment is made with the and Paymaster General (Tessa Jowell): I welcome Ian benefit of retrospection and of the two reports having Johnston’s report and the wider report published on the been carried out, as well as with the benefit of hindsight. same day by Chief Inspector Dennis O’Connor. We The important step now is that the recommendations of have looked very carefully at both reports, and my the report are implemented, as they will be. Department will shortly send new guidance on managing information to Departments and adopt the chief inspector’s Third Sector (Recession) protocol for future consideration of police involvement in leak investigations, which recognises the high threshold 2. Clive Efford (Eltham) (Lab): What her most recent required for police involvement. assessment is of the effect of the recession on the third sector; and if she will make a statement. [295975] Mr. Turner: The police inspectorate’s report has savaged the role of the Cabinet Office in calling the Metropolitan The Minister of State, Cabinet Office (Angela E. police to arrest my hon. Friend the Member for Ashford Smith): We recognise that this is a very difficult time for (Damian Green). Will the Minister place the current the sector, with some parts experiencing increased demand guidelines and protocol in the Library so that we can for their services at the same time as having concerns review the failings of the existing rules? about their financial situation. That is why the Government have provided a comprehensive package of support for Tessa Jowell: Both reports reflect very fairly the state the third sector worth up to £42.5 million. The money is of events that led to the police involvement—a series of getting out there right now to groups who need it. leaks, some of which gave rise to concern about national Thousands of grants have been made, and that is supporting security. I would say to the hon. Gentleman that it is the communities that need it most and providing jobs. very easy, with the benefit of hindsight, to reach a different judgment. I have made it clear in my answer Clive Efford: I welcome my hon. Friend’s answer; that that the lessons of the O’Connor and Johnston reports will be very welcome news to the voluntary sector. will be applied in full, and I will certainly consult the However, many funders of not-for-profit voluntary Cabinet Secretary about the release of the information organisations do not recognise the need to cover their that the hon. Gentleman seeks. core funding in order to make them sustainable for the 269 Oral Answers28 OCTOBER 2009 Oral Answers 270 future. Those organisations want to create income that initiatives to get more people into work by increasing provides for that. I come across this problem frequently the work that they do, so as to benefit from the programmes in organisations that I work with in my constituency. that have recently been put in place? Will she encourage funders to bear this in mind in future? Angela E. Smith: The response to the Government programmes put in place during the recession has been Angela E. Smith: Absolutely. My hon. Friend has a remarkable. I am pleased to say that the anecdotal reputation in his constituency for his involvement in the response that we are getting, particularly on grass-roots third sector, and the points that he makes are entirely grants, is that the forms and application process are valid. Let me mention some of the things that the easier and simpler than they have ever been before. Government are doing; I hope that other funders will There is an increased number of volunteers, and we are consider them. Grass-root grants are going directly to supporting them through a variety of programmes. The smaller organisations—an initiative that has never been evidence is clear that people who volunteer often find a taken before, coupled with an endowment process—and route into work by gaining skills, confidence and that is providing £130 million. That can address the connections with employers. issue of core funding. We also have the community assets programme, providing £30 million across the Charities (Regulatory Burden) country for projects involving buildings that are sustainable for the long term. May I direct him also to 3. Mr. Ian Taylor (Esher and Walton) (Con): What Communitybuilders, a £70 million programme that was steps the Government are taking to reduce the recently opened for applications and has received 1,500 regulatory burden on charities. [295976] already? That is the kind of programme that the organisations he mentions will benefit from. The Minister of State, Cabinet Office (Angela E. Smith): The changes that we have made to charity law Mr. Nick Hurd (Ruislip-Northwood) (Con): We should and to accounting and reporting thresholds have resulted be concerned that more than 10,000 charities have in savings of thousands of pounds for charities. ceased operating in the past six months, according to Departments are cutting red tape for third sector the Charity Commission. After two years of consultation, organisations, and further progress will be reported we are still no clearer about Government plans to make before the end of the year. The Government and the gift aid easier and more effective for charities. Instead, National Audit Office have produced guidance to reduce we are now getting signals from private meetings that red tape associated with the £12 billion a year that the the Treasury actually wants to scrap tax reliefs for sector gets from the Government. higher rate payers who give to charity. This must be the wrong time to be hiding things from the sector. When Mr. Taylor: Does the Minister understand that in my will the Government come clean on their plans for the constituency, charities are worried about the detailed reform of gift aid? applications for gift aid, which she has just discussed, the ending of the ring-fencing of Supporting People Angela E. Smith: The number of charities has reduced, and particularly the vagueness of the extension of Criminal but from talking to the Charity Commission we find Records Bureau checks, especially for volunteers dealing that that is about the cleaning up of the charities list. with children. The problem is not that the regulations There are charities that have been on the list for some are wrong, it is the application of them that is causing time but have not been functional, or there may have concern.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Development of Slavery in the Natchez District, 1720-1820
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Dissertations Spring 5-2012 Slavery and Empire: The Development of Slavery in the Natchez District, 1720-1820 Christian Pinnen University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations Part of the Cultural History Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Pinnen, Christian, "Slavery and Empire: The Development of Slavery in the Natchez District, 1720-1820" (2012). Dissertations. 821. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/821 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi SLAVERY AND EMPIRE: THE DEVELOPMENT OF SLAVERY IN THE NATCHEZ DISTRICT, 1720-1820 by Christian Pinnen Abstract of a Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2012 ABSTRACT SLAVERY AND EMPIRE: THE DEVELOPMENT OF SLAVERY IN THE NATCHEZ DISTRICT, 1720-1820 by Christian Pinnen May 2012 “Slavery and Empire: The Development of Slavery in the Natchez District, 1720- 1820,” examines how slaves and colonists weathered the economic and political upheavals that rocked the Lower Mississippi Valley. The study focuses on the fitful— and often futile—efforts of the French, the English, the Spanish, and the Americans to establish plantation agriculture in Natchez and its environs, a district that emerged as the heart of the “Cotton Kingdom” in the decades following the American Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Affairs Brief a Daily Summary of Political Events Affecting the Jewish Community
    20 March 2009 Political Affairs Brief A daily summary of political events affecting the Jewish Community Scottish Council of Jewish Communities SCoJeC Contents Home Affairs Relevant Legislation Community Relations Consultations Israel Home Affairs UK Parliamentary Questions Church Repairs Ben Chapman (Wirral, South) (Lab): What progress has been made in discussions between the Church of England and the Chancellor of the Exchequer on levels of value added tax charged on church repairs. [264462] The Second Church Estates Commissioner: Church representatives have been in regular contact with the Treasury on that matter. The latest development is the agreement reached by the European Council of Finance Ministers on 10 March that all member states will have the option to apply permanently reduced VAT rates to a number of goods and services. I very much regret that the repair of places of worship is not on that list of goods and services. Ben Chapman: Is it not a pity that the Council found the opportunity to discuss VAT reductions for some toll bridges and restaurants, but not for church buildings, which provide so much emotional, spiritual and cultural well-being? What is the next step? Sir Stuart Bell: I agree entirely with my hon. Friend. One has to bear in mind that the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, now Prime Minister, agreed effectively to reduce VAT on church repairs to 5 per cent. until 2011. The campaign by Members in this House will be to maintain that derogation well after that date. I am sure that right hon. and hon. Members will add their weight to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Nhs Vale of York Clinical Commissioning Group
    Item Number: 5 NHS VALE OF YORK CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP GOVERNING BODY MEETING Meeting Date: 4 July 2013 Report Sponsor: Report Author: Mark Hayes Mark Hayes Chief Clinical Officer 1. Title of Paper: Chief Clinical Officer Report 2. Strategic Objectives supported by this paper 1. Improve healthcare outcomes 2. Reduce health inequalities 3. Improve the quality and safety of commissioned services 4. Improve efficiency 5. Achieve financial balance 3. Executive Summary This report provides an update on a number of meetings which have taken place during the last month and associated issues. 4. Evidence Base Not applicable 5. Risks relating to proposals in this paper Not applicable 1 6. Summary of any finance / resource implications Not applicable 7. Any statutory / regulatory / legal / NHS Constitution implications Not applicable 8. Equality Impact Assessment Not applicable 9. Any related work with stakeholders or communications plan Not applicable 10. Recommendations / Action Required The Governing Body is asked to note the Chief Clinical Officer Report. 11. Assurance Not applicable 2 NHS VALE OF YORK CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP Governing Body Meeting: 4 July 2013 Chief Clinical Officer Report 1. Regulation and Control – Urgent Decision I want to inform the Governing Body that I met with three members of the Governing Body on 3 May 2013 and we made the decision to agree to reconsider and approve funding for a nasal procedure on a patient who was the victim of a criminal assault. This had previously been turned down. 2. Integration The CCG continues to work closely with our Local Authorities colleagues to investigate the potential benefits of increasing the integration of health and social care services.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of a Meeting Held at the Town Hall, Lowestoft
    WAVENEY DISTRICT COUNCIL – 20/03/19 Confirmed Minutes of the Council meeting held at Riverside, Canning Road, Lowestoft on Wednesday, 20 March 2019 at 6.30 pm. Members present: F Mortimer (Chairman), S Ardley, P Ashdown, E Back, M Barnard, D Beavan, M Bee, N Brooks, P Byatt, A Cackett, G Catchpole, J Ceresa, M Cherry, Y Cherry, L Coulam, J Craig, G Elliott, J Ford, T Gandy, T Goldson, I Graham, K Grant, A Green, M Ladd, P Light, T Mortimer, J Murray, K Patience, M Pitchers, B Provan, C Punt, D Ritchie, C Rivett, K Robinson, M Rudd, L Smith, K Springall, C Topping, M Vigo di Gallidoro and N Webb. Officers present: S Baker (Chief Executive), C Bing (Legal & Licensing Services Manager), S Bleese (Coastal Manager South), P Harris (Communications Manager), S Hubbard (Principal Planner for Policy & Delivery), A Jarvis (Strategic Director), N Khan (Strategic Director), D Reed (Planning Policy & Delivery Manager), S Taylor (Chief Finance Officer & Section 151 Officer), and N Wotton (Democratic Services Manager). Officers in attendance: K Blair (Head of Operations), S Carter (Democratic Services Officer), C Clamp (Assistant Planning Officer), R Cook (Planning Technician), S Davis (Democratic Services Officer), S Martin (Head of Internal Audit), N Rickard (Head of Communities), P Wood (Head of Economic Development & Regeneration). Others present: T Doherty (Project Manager, Balfour Beatty, Lowestoft Flood Risk Management Project Contractors). The Chairman welcomed all those present to the last ever Waveney District Council meeting. He stated that he felt very privileged and honoured to have served Waveney District Council as Chairman for the past 2 years and to preside over this, the very last Waveney District Council meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Baroness Brown of Cambridge • Vice Chair
    EU ENVIRONMENT SUB-COMMITTEE DECLARATION OF INTERESTS Interests declared: Baroness Brown of Cambridge • Vice Chair of the Committee on Climate Change • Chair of the Adaptation Committee of the Committee on Climate Change • Chair of the Carbon Trust • Sector Champion for the Offshore Wind Sector Deal • Chair of the Independent Climate and Environment Review for Cambridgeshire and Peterborough • Board member of the Offshore Renewable Catapult Share ownership: • BP plc; • Rolls-Royce plc Baroness Bryan of Partick Nil Lord Cameron of Dillington (Deputy Chair) • Farmer and landowner in receipt of Single Farm Payment, managing let property for both commercial and domestic tenants • Managing forestry • Chair of Strategic Advisory Board of the UK Government’s Global Food Security Programme • Chair of the board at the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology • Trustee of the Lawes Trust at Rothamsted Research • Chair of Airports Direct Travel Ltd. (internet travel and airport parking) • Member, Secretary of State’s panel looking at National Parks and Designated Areas Lord Carter of Coles • Farms, farmland, residential and tourist activities in Hertfordshire Lord Cormack Nil Lord Giddens Nil Baroness Jolly Nil Baroness McIntosh of Pickering Directorships • Director and sole owner, Anne McIntosh Consulting Limited (strategic advice on food, farming and the environment) • Non-executive Chair, The National Proof of Age Standards Scheme (PASSCO CiC) Remunerated employment, office, profession etc. • Advocate; member of Faculty of Advocates, Edinburgh (non-practising)
    [Show full text]
  • Conference '09
    CravenRail The newsletter for supporters of SELRAP: - the Skipton-East Lancashire Rail Action Partnership Issue 14 Conference edition 2010 “The Department for Transport has agreed to work with Pennine Lancashire partners to develop a process to take forward the Colne to Skipton Rail Reinstatement, through the Pennine Lancashire Multi Area Agreement” ..... Gordon Brown, Prime Minister And there is more. For, fast forwarding to the views expressed [below] by keynote speakers at SELRAP’s Autumn 2009 conference, it is clear that proposals to reopen the Skipton-Colne rail line are now flagged up by all the major political parties ..... Ed. “There are substantial benefits, it is clear, from reopening this [Skipton-Colne] portion of track. They are not only the direct benefits, but [also] the wider benefits”..... Stephen Hammond, Conservative Shadow Transport Minister “We have identified 14 lines which we think should be reopened without any further delay. You will not be surprised to learn that Colne-Skipton is in there!” ..... Norman Baker, Lib Dem Shadow Secretary of State for Transport CONFERENCE ‘09: • POLITICIANS • RAIL INDUSTRY • DEVELOPERS YES • PLANNERS to • CONSULTANTS RAIL LINK Skipton-East Lancashire Rail Action Partnership LINKING CITIES AND REGIONS ACROSS THE NORTH Patrons: Richard Bannister, Rt Revd Nicholas Reade. MPs David Curry, Gordon Prentice, Kitty Ussher, Nigel Evans, Anne McIntosh. MEPs Chris Davies, Jacqueline Foster, Timothy Kirkhope, Brian Simpson, Diana Wallis. 2 Being a conference edition you’d expect a reference to SELRAP’s most high profile event, ever. And what with Network Rail being the nation’s infrastructure provider, it Contents seems a good point to open the batting: Network Rail very much understands the challenge that the Skipton East Lancs Railway Action Partnership are seeking to address in the re-instatement of the Colne-Skipton line and has had a number of useful meetings with the Partnership in recent months.
    [Show full text]
  • Results Elected Members
    Results and Elected Members Second edition based on official statistics where available 13 JuLy, 1989 PE 133.341 C 0 N T E N T S Electorate and turnout in the 12 . 1 Great Britain . 2 Northern Ireland . 3 Great Britain constituency results .................................... 4 Ireland constituency results .......................................... 14 Belgium ............................................................... 16 Denmark ............................................................... 18 France ................................................................ 20 Germany . 22 Greece ................................................................ 24 Ireland ............................................................... 26 Italy ................................................................. 28 Luxembourg . 31 Netherlands ........................................................... 33 Portugal .............................................................. 35 Spain ......................... : . ...................................... 37 United Kingdom ........................................................ 39 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS Electorate and turnout in EC states in 1979, 1984 and 1989 Country Electorate Turnout V\J.lid votes Belgium 1989 7,096,273 90.7 5,899,285 1984 6,975,677 92.2 5,725,837 1979 6,800,584 91.4 5,442,867 Denmark 1989 3,923,549 46.2 1,789,395 1984 3,878,600 52.4 2,001,875 1979 3,754,423 47.8 1,754,350 France 1989 38,348,191 48.7 18,145,588 1984 36,880,688 56.7 20,180,934 1979 35,180,531 60.7 20,242,347 Germany 1989 45,773,179 62.3 28,206,690 1984 44,451,981 56.8 24,851,371 1979 42,751,940 65.7 27,847,109 Greece 1989 8,347.387 79.9 6,544,669 1984 7,790,309 77.2 5,956,060 1981 7,319,070 78.6 5,753,478 Ireland 1989 2,453,451 68.3 1,632, 728 1984 2,413,404 47.6 1,l20,-ll6 1979 2,188, 798 63.6 1 '339.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Contamination
    House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Food Contamination Fifth Report of Session 2013–14 Volume II Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 10 July 2013 Published on 16 July 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and its associated bodies. Current membership Miss Anne McIntosh (Conservative, Thirsk and Malton) (Chair) Richard Drax, (Conservative, South Dorset) George Eustice (Conservative, Camborne and Redruth) Barry Gardiner (Labour, Brent North) Mrs Mary Glindon (Labour, North Tyneside) Mrs Emma Lewell-Buck (Labour, South Side) Iain McKenzie (Labour, Inverclyde) Sheryll Murray (Conservative, South East Cornwall) Neil Parish (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Ms Margaret Ritchie (Social Democratic and Labour Party, South Down) Dan Rogerson (Liberal Democrat, North Cornwall) Thomas Docherty (Labour, Dunfermline and West Fife) was a member of the Committee during this inquiry. Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/efracom Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are David Weir (Clerk), Anna Dickson (Second Clerk), Sarah Coe (Committee Specialist—Environment), Phil Jones (Committee Specialist—Agriculture), Clare Genis (Senior Committee Assistant), Owen James (Committee Assistant), Yago Zayed (Committee Support Assistant), and Hannah Pearce (Media Officer).
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Thursday Volume 591 22 January 2015 No. 97 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 22 January 2015 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2015 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 345 22 JANUARY 2015 346 fairly. Account is taken of rurality and road usage in the House of Commons various highways authorities when we allocate this money to them. Thursday 22 January 2015 15. [907152] Damian Green (Ashford) (Con): In Kent, The House met at half-past Nine o’clock we are grateful for the £142 million we are receiving from the highways maintenance fund. Will the Secretary of State join me in urging not just the PRAYERS highways authority but Kent county council to pay particular attention to rural roads in Kent? They have [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] suffered terribly in recent winters and are in desperate need of this extra support. Mr McLoughlin: My right hon. Friend rightly points Oral Answers to Questions out the allocation that has been made to Kent. As I said, in this Parliament we have increased by 27% what the previous Government spent on road maintenance, TRANSPORT and in December I announced another funding increase of more than 20%. I hope that we see a fair sharing of it The Secretary of State was asked— across the whole of the community—in both urban and rural areas. Potholes Duncan Hames (Chippenham) (LD): The extra £86 million allocated to fix and improve Wiltshire’s 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sessional Diary 2005–06
    HOUSE OF COMMONS SESSIONAL DIARY 2005–06 11 May 2005 to 8 November 2006 Prepared in the Journal Office of the House of Commons INTRODUCTION 1. This diary records the business on which the House spent its time in Session 2005–06, analysed into categories, and similar information for sittings in Westminster Hall. It is intended mainly to provide information in response to statistical inquiries, and in using it the following points should be borne in mind: (a) The diary does not include business which took little or no time, such as presentations of bills, unopposed private business, and motions agreed to without debate or division. (b) Divisions are normally included with the business to which they relate. (c) Timings are taken from the Official Report, using the printed times where available, and otherwise taking a column of debate to last three minutes. Daily prayers are assumed to last a standard five minutes (and are not itemised in the analysis), and the time at which the House rose is taken from the Votes and Proceedings. (d) Periods of suspension are included in the total sitting time, and are listed in section 14h of the analysis (Miscellaneous). However, the 2½-hour suspension from 11.30 to 14.00 in Westminster Hall on most Tuesdays and Wednesdays (introduced on 1 January 2003) is shown in brackets in the “Duration” column and is left out of the totals. Other suspensions in Westminster Hall are included in the totals and in the analysis under section 5. (e) The times in the column headed “After appointed time” refer to business taken after the time appointed as the “moment of interruption”.
    [Show full text]
  • Sessional Returns
    House of Commons SESSIONAL RETURNS Session 2008–09 3 December 2008– 12 November 2009 RETURNS to Orders of the Honourable The House of Commons, dated 26 November 2009—(The Chairman of Ways and Means) HOUSE, COMMITTEES OF THE WHOLE HOUSE, GENERAL COMMITTEES AND SELECT COMMITTEES Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 25 January 2010 HC 1 Published on 27 January 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 INTRODUCTORY NOTE The Sessional Returns were first published in consolidated form for Session 1986– 87. Returns of: i. Closure of debate in the House and in Standing Committees dating back to 1887 and 1907 respectively; ii. Delegated Legislation from Session 1974–75; iii. Private Bills and Private Business from 1981; iv. Sittings of the House from Session 1960–61; and v. Special Procedure Orders from Session 1972–73 have been placed in the House of Commons Library where they may be inspected by Members. Copies have also been supplied to the Parliamentary Archives, where they are available to the public for inspection. Requests for inspection should be addressed to the Parliamentary Archives, Houses of Parliament, London, SW1A 0PW (020 7219 3074). Hours of inspection are from 9.30am to 5.00pm Mondays to Fridays. The Public Bill Office of the House of Commons maintains a Public Bill Index from 1922 to the present day. A Weekly Information Bulletin showing the progress of all legislation, listing Committee meetings and providing other information relating to the business of the House is compiled by the Public Information Office of the House of Commons and published by The Stationery Office Limited.
    [Show full text]