DOCSLIB.ORG

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) Thursday Volume 591 22 January 2015 No. 97 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 22 January 2015 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2015 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 345 22 JANUARY 2015 346 fairly. Account is taken of rurality and road usage in the House of Commons various highways authorities when we allocate this money to them. Thursday 22 January 2015 15. [907152] Damian Green (Ashford) (Con): In Kent, The House met at half-past Nine o’clock we are grateful for the £142 million we are receiving from the highways maintenance fund. Will the Secretary of State join me in urging not just the PRAYERS highways authority but Kent county council to pay particular attention to rural roads in Kent? They have [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] suffered terribly in recent winters and are in desperate need of this extra support. Mr McLoughlin: My right hon. Friend rightly points Oral Answers to Questions out the allocation that has been made to Kent. As I said, in this Parliament we have increased by 27% what the previous Government spent on road maintenance, TRANSPORT and in December I announced another funding increase of more than 20%. I hope that we see a fair sharing of it The Secretary of State was asked— across the whole of the community—in both urban and rural areas. Potholes Duncan Hames (Chippenham) (LD): The extra £86 million allocated to fix and improve Wiltshire’s 1. Sir David Amess (Southend West) (Con): What roads over the next six years is very welcome. What financial assistance he is providing to local authorities steps is the Secretary of State taking to ensure that this to repair potholes. [907133] is indeed additional money spent on our roads and that 8. Andrew Jones (Harrogate and Knaresborough) councils do not use it to top up their reserves, or (Con): What financial assistance he is providing to displace money that otherwise would have been spent local authorities to repair potholes. [907142] on roads to meet other spending pressures? The Secretary of State for Transport (Mr Patrick Mr McLoughlin: Overall, local authorities do take McLoughlin): Potholes are a menace to all road users their highway maintenance projects seriously. I point and that is why this Government are taking action. I out to the hon. Gentleman that one cannot argue for announced in December 2014 that we are allocating just localism and then argue all the time for central direction. under £6 billion for councils in England to tackle potholes However, I very much hope that all authorities that have and improve local road conditions over the next six been allocated the money spend it on the roads. Some years. This funding is on top of the £4.7 billion we have other funds are available, and we will judge what local provided since 2010. authorities have done regarding how those funds are distributed. Sir David Amess: Unfortunately, I receive lots of complaints about the state of local roads. I do understand that repairing potholes is very expensive, and I commend A64 (Dualling) last week’s national pothole week. Despite the present strains on the economy, I ask my right hon. Friend that 2. Miss Anne McIntosh (Thirsk and Malton) (Con): sufficient funds be made available so that local roads in What plans he has to provide funding for dualling of Southend are kept in good order. the A64. [907134] Mr McLoughlin: I pointed out in my announcement The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport that Southend-on-Sea would get £7.3 million over the (Mr Robert Goodwill): It is no secret that the A64 is also period I have just referred to. Despite the financial important to my constituency of Scarborough and Whitby. situation we found ourselves in when we entered The first major investment for 38 years in the A64 east government, we allocated 27% more for road repairs in of York was announced as part of our road investment this Parliament than the previous Government did in strategy last month. This addressed the notorious Hopgrove the last Parliament. roundabout pinch point. As part of the detailed design Andrew Jones: North Yorkshire has one of the biggest of the scheme, the case for dualling nearby sections of networks of rural roads in the country, and we are very the A64 will be considered. grateful for the extra cash the Government have provided to help. Rural areas often have a large road network, Miss McIntosh: While I am grateful for that answer, supported by the small tax base of the rural population. there are currently huge numbers of casualties and Can the impact of rurality be better reflected in funding fatalities in the villages of Ganton, Rillington and for future repairs to our road network? Heslerton, which have no speed restrictions on the roads and no protections for the very vulnerable crossing Mr McLoughlin: I certainly understand the point my them—children and the elderly. Will my hon. Friend hon. Friend makes—indeed, I have a large rural give priority to that section of the A64, in which I know constituency that has many similar problems. It is up to he too has a personal interest, serving as it does his own the highways authority to look after its entire network constituency? 347 Oral Answers22 JANUARY 2015 Oral Answers 348 Mr Goodwill: When considering investment in our beyond CP5 and into CP6, particularly to enhance roads network, two factors are always borne in mind. capacity and improve journey times for the parts of One is congestion, and in that respect the section between East Anglia and Essex that he represents. Malton and Hopgrove is the busiest and most congested. The other is safety, and that would include the situation Mrs Louise Ellman (Liverpool, Riverside) (Lab/Co-op): to which my hon. Friend refers. Network Rail is now fully in the public sector. Will this improve public accountability and enable passengers to Railway Improvements travel on safe, newer trains, and trains that are appropriate for the newly electrified lines? 3. Christopher Pincher (Tamworth) (Con): What plans he has to introduce new rolling stock and Claire Perry: The hon. Lady shares with me a firm infrastructure on the railway. [907135] commitment to ensuring that passengers have safe and better journeys. That is the point of this unprecedented The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport level of investment. It is within the grasp of us all to (Claire Perry): Network Rail is delivering an unprecedented hold Network Rail to account. It is an arm’s length £38 billion investment programme for the period from public body, and we have a regulator that regulates its 2014 to 2019, which will transform the infrastructure on investment programme. Network Rail is also accountable the busiest parts of Britain’s rail network. Passengers to Members of Parliament just as it is to members of will also see significant improvements in rolling stock, the public. She will be aware that we are holding a series thanks to the Government’s unprecedented investment of performance summits with the train operating companies and the changes to the franchising programme. This and Network Rail, particularly relating to the routes will allow passengers across the country to benefit from that have shown the worst performance data over the the enhanced investment. past few months. Christopher Pincher: I am grateful for that answer, Sir Alan Haselhurst (Saffron Walden) (Con): Will my but on the question of infrastructure, my constituents hon. Friend tell the House how the feasibility study on in Drayton Bassett are concerned by comments that the West Anglia line, promised by the Minister of State, have been made by the right hon. Member for Birmingham, my right hon. Friend the Member for South Holland Hodge Hill (Mr Byrne) that the HS2 marshalling yard and The Deepings (Mr Hayes), is being progressed? proposed for Washwood Heath might be moved. Will my hon. Friend confirm that the Government believe Claire Perry: I believe that that is part of the whole that Washwood Heath is the right site for such a marshalling aspiration for the Anglian upgrades relating to routes, yard and that they do not propose to move it? investment and capacity, which has been nicely packaged in the “Norwich in 90”proposals. A series of consultations Claire Perry: I can confirm that Washwood Heath is are currently taking place, and I will write to my right absolutely the right location for the rolling stock hon. Friend with specific updates on the point that he maintenance depot. This was confirmed by the High has raised. Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Bill Select Committee’s announcement in December, and it would Mr Barry Sheerman (Huddersfield) (Lab/Co-op): When be a brave and foolhardy politician who suggested for it comes to the railways, it is always pie in the sky, or political reasons that anything else might be appropriate. arm’s length, or somebody else’s fault. When is the Minister going to take responsibility for a Government Andy Sawford (Corby) (Lab/Co-op): I met representatives who have done so little to get people in Yorkshire and of East Midlands Trains this week to discuss the the rest of the north of England moving around securely, electrification of the line to Corby. I am concerned that safely and on time? when that happens there might no longer be any services running north from Corby on the Manton line. Will the Claire Perry: I have respect for the hon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Development of Slavery in the Natchez District, 1720-1820
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Dissertations Spring 5-2012 Slavery and Empire: The Development of Slavery in the Natchez District, 1720-1820 Christian Pinnen University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations Part of the Cultural History Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Pinnen, Christian, "Slavery and Empire: The Development of Slavery in the Natchez District, 1720-1820" (2012). Dissertations. 821. https://aquila.usm.edu/dissertations/821 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi SLAVERY AND EMPIRE: THE DEVELOPMENT OF SLAVERY IN THE NATCHEZ DISTRICT, 1720-1820 by Christian Pinnen Abstract of a Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2012 ABSTRACT SLAVERY AND EMPIRE: THE DEVELOPMENT OF SLAVERY IN THE NATCHEZ DISTRICT, 1720-1820 by Christian Pinnen May 2012 “Slavery and Empire: The Development of Slavery in the Natchez District, 1720- 1820,” examines how slaves and colonists weathered the economic and political upheavals that rocked the Lower Mississippi Valley. The study focuses on the fitful— and often futile—efforts of the French, the English, the Spanish, and the Americans to establish plantation agriculture in Natchez and its environs, a district that emerged as the heart of the “Cotton Kingdom” in the decades following the American Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Affairs Brief a Daily Summary of Political Events Affecting the Jewish Community
    20 March 2009 Political Affairs Brief A daily summary of political events affecting the Jewish Community Scottish Council of Jewish Communities SCoJeC Contents Home Affairs Relevant Legislation Community Relations Consultations Israel Home Affairs UK Parliamentary Questions Church Repairs Ben Chapman (Wirral, South) (Lab): What progress has been made in discussions between the Church of England and the Chancellor of the Exchequer on levels of value added tax charged on church repairs. [264462] The Second Church Estates Commissioner: Church representatives have been in regular contact with the Treasury on that matter. The latest development is the agreement reached by the European Council of Finance Ministers on 10 March that all member states will have the option to apply permanently reduced VAT rates to a number of goods and services. I very much regret that the repair of places of worship is not on that list of goods and services. Ben Chapman: Is it not a pity that the Council found the opportunity to discuss VAT reductions for some toll bridges and restaurants, but not for church buildings, which provide so much emotional, spiritual and cultural well-being? What is the next step? Sir Stuart Bell: I agree entirely with my hon. Friend. One has to bear in mind that the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, now Prime Minister, agreed effectively to reduce VAT on church repairs to 5 per cent. until 2011. The campaign by Members in this House will be to maintain that derogation well after that date. I am sure that right hon. and hon. Members will add their weight to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Nhs Vale of York Clinical Commissioning Group
    Item Number: 5 NHS VALE OF YORK CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP GOVERNING BODY MEETING Meeting Date: 4 July 2013 Report Sponsor: Report Author: Mark Hayes Mark Hayes Chief Clinical Officer 1. Title of Paper: Chief Clinical Officer Report 2. Strategic Objectives supported by this paper 1. Improve healthcare outcomes 2. Reduce health inequalities 3. Improve the quality and safety of commissioned services 4. Improve efficiency 5. Achieve financial balance 3. Executive Summary This report provides an update on a number of meetings which have taken place during the last month and associated issues. 4. Evidence Base Not applicable 5. Risks relating to proposals in this paper Not applicable 1 6. Summary of any finance / resource implications Not applicable 7. Any statutory / regulatory / legal / NHS Constitution implications Not applicable 8. Equality Impact Assessment Not applicable 9. Any related work with stakeholders or communications plan Not applicable 10. Recommendations / Action Required The Governing Body is asked to note the Chief Clinical Officer Report. 11. Assurance Not applicable 2 NHS VALE OF YORK CLINICAL COMMISSIONING GROUP Governing Body Meeting: 4 July 2013 Chief Clinical Officer Report 1. Regulation and Control – Urgent Decision I want to inform the Governing Body that I met with three members of the Governing Body on 3 May 2013 and we made the decision to agree to reconsider and approve funding for a nasal procedure on a patient who was the victim of a criminal assault. This had previously been turned down. 2. Integration The CCG continues to work closely with our Local Authorities colleagues to investigate the potential benefits of increasing the integration of health and social care services.
    [Show full text]
  • Baroness Brown of Cambridge • Vice Chair
    EU ENVIRONMENT SUB-COMMITTEE DECLARATION OF INTERESTS Interests declared: Baroness Brown of Cambridge • Vice Chair of the Committee on Climate Change • Chair of the Adaptation Committee of the Committee on Climate Change • Chair of the Carbon Trust • Sector Champion for the Offshore Wind Sector Deal • Chair of the Independent Climate and Environment Review for Cambridgeshire and Peterborough • Board member of the Offshore Renewable Catapult Share ownership: • BP plc; • Rolls-Royce plc Baroness Bryan of Partick Nil Lord Cameron of Dillington (Deputy Chair) • Farmer and landowner in receipt of Single Farm Payment, managing let property for both commercial and domestic tenants • Managing forestry • Chair of Strategic Advisory Board of the UK Government’s Global Food Security Programme • Chair of the board at the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology • Trustee of the Lawes Trust at Rothamsted Research • Chair of Airports Direct Travel Ltd. (internet travel and airport parking) • Member, Secretary of State’s panel looking at National Parks and Designated Areas Lord Carter of Coles • Farms, farmland, residential and tourist activities in Hertfordshire Lord Cormack Nil Lord Giddens Nil Baroness Jolly Nil Baroness McIntosh of Pickering Directorships • Director and sole owner, Anne McIntosh Consulting Limited (strategic advice on food, farming and the environment) • Non-executive Chair, The National Proof of Age Standards Scheme (PASSCO CiC) Remunerated employment, office, profession etc. • Advocate; member of Faculty of Advocates, Edinburgh (non-practising)
    [Show full text]
  • Conference '09
    CravenRail The newsletter for supporters of SELRAP: - the Skipton-East Lancashire Rail Action Partnership Issue 14 Conference edition 2010 “The Department for Transport has agreed to work with Pennine Lancashire partners to develop a process to take forward the Colne to Skipton Rail Reinstatement, through the Pennine Lancashire Multi Area Agreement” ..... Gordon Brown, Prime Minister And there is more. For, fast forwarding to the views expressed [below] by keynote speakers at SELRAP’s Autumn 2009 conference, it is clear that proposals to reopen the Skipton-Colne rail line are now flagged up by all the major political parties ..... Ed. “There are substantial benefits, it is clear, from reopening this [Skipton-Colne] portion of track. They are not only the direct benefits, but [also] the wider benefits”..... Stephen Hammond, Conservative Shadow Transport Minister “We have identified 14 lines which we think should be reopened without any further delay. You will not be surprised to learn that Colne-Skipton is in there!” ..... Norman Baker, Lib Dem Shadow Secretary of State for Transport CONFERENCE ‘09: • POLITICIANS • RAIL INDUSTRY • DEVELOPERS YES • PLANNERS to • CONSULTANTS RAIL LINK Skipton-East Lancashire Rail Action Partnership LINKING CITIES AND REGIONS ACROSS THE NORTH Patrons: Richard Bannister, Rt Revd Nicholas Reade. MPs David Curry, Gordon Prentice, Kitty Ussher, Nigel Evans, Anne McIntosh. MEPs Chris Davies, Jacqueline Foster, Timothy Kirkhope, Brian Simpson, Diana Wallis. 2 Being a conference edition you’d expect a reference to SELRAP’s most high profile event, ever. And what with Network Rail being the nation’s infrastructure provider, it Contents seems a good point to open the batting: Network Rail very much understands the challenge that the Skipton East Lancs Railway Action Partnership are seeking to address in the re-instatement of the Colne-Skipton line and has had a number of useful meetings with the Partnership in recent months.
    [Show full text]
  • Results Elected Members
    Results and Elected Members Second edition based on official statistics where available 13 JuLy, 1989 PE 133.341 C 0 N T E N T S Electorate and turnout in the 12 . 1 Great Britain . 2 Northern Ireland . 3 Great Britain constituency results .................................... 4 Ireland constituency results .......................................... 14 Belgium ............................................................... 16 Denmark ............................................................... 18 France ................................................................ 20 Germany . 22 Greece ................................................................ 24 Ireland ............................................................... 26 Italy ................................................................. 28 Luxembourg . 31 Netherlands ........................................................... 33 Portugal .............................................................. 35 Spain ......................... : . ...................................... 37 United Kingdom ........................................................ 39 EUROPEAN ELECTIONS Electorate and turnout in EC states in 1979, 1984 and 1989 Country Electorate Turnout V\J.lid votes Belgium 1989 7,096,273 90.7 5,899,285 1984 6,975,677 92.2 5,725,837 1979 6,800,584 91.4 5,442,867 Denmark 1989 3,923,549 46.2 1,789,395 1984 3,878,600 52.4 2,001,875 1979 3,754,423 47.8 1,754,350 France 1989 38,348,191 48.7 18,145,588 1984 36,880,688 56.7 20,180,934 1979 35,180,531 60.7 20,242,347 Germany 1989 45,773,179 62.3 28,206,690 1984 44,451,981 56.8 24,851,371 1979 42,751,940 65.7 27,847,109 Greece 1989 8,347.387 79.9 6,544,669 1984 7,790,309 77.2 5,956,060 1981 7,319,070 78.6 5,753,478 Ireland 1989 2,453,451 68.3 1,632, 728 1984 2,413,404 47.6 1,l20,-ll6 1979 2,188, 798 63.6 1 '339.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Contamination
    House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Food Contamination Fifth Report of Session 2013–14 Volume II Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 10 July 2013 Published on 16 July 2013 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and its associated bodies. Current membership Miss Anne McIntosh (Conservative, Thirsk and Malton) (Chair) Richard Drax, (Conservative, South Dorset) George Eustice (Conservative, Camborne and Redruth) Barry Gardiner (Labour, Brent North) Mrs Mary Glindon (Labour, North Tyneside) Mrs Emma Lewell-Buck (Labour, South Side) Iain McKenzie (Labour, Inverclyde) Sheryll Murray (Conservative, South East Cornwall) Neil Parish (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Ms Margaret Ritchie (Social Democratic and Labour Party, South Down) Dan Rogerson (Liberal Democrat, North Cornwall) Thomas Docherty (Labour, Dunfermline and West Fife) was a member of the Committee during this inquiry. Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/efracom Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are David Weir (Clerk), Anna Dickson (Second Clerk), Sarah Coe (Committee Specialist—Environment), Phil Jones (Committee Specialist—Agriculture), Clare Genis (Senior Committee Assistant), Owen James (Committee Assistant), Yago Zayed (Committee Support Assistant), and Hannah Pearce (Media Officer).
    [Show full text]
  • Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee
    House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Winter floods 2013–14 First Report of Session 2014–15 HC 240 House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Winter floods 2013-14 First Report of Session 2014–15 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 11 June 2014 HC 240 INCORPORATING HC 991, SESSION 2013–14 Published on 17 June 2014 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and its associated bodies. Current membership Miss Anne McIntosh (Conservative, Thirsk and Malton) (Chair) Richard Drax (Conservative, South Dorset) Jim Fitzpatrick (Labour, Poplar and Limehouse) Mrs Mary Glindon (Labour, North Tyneside) Mrs Emma Lewell-Buck (Labour, South Shields) Iain McKenzie (Labour, Inverclyde) Sheryll Murray (Conservative, South East Cornwall) Neil Parish (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Ms Margaret Ritchie (Social Democratic and Labour Party, South Down) Mr Mark Spencer (Conservative, Sherwood) Roger Williams (Liberal Democrat, Brecon and Radnorshire) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/efracom and by The Stationary Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • View Into the Broader Issues Surrounding Claims; the Right Hon
    Wednesday Volume 498 28 October 2009 No. 132 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 28 October 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 267 28 OCTOBER 2009 268 Mr. Francis Maude (Horsham) (Con): The Minister House of Commons says that there was some concern about national security, but Sir Ian Johnston’s report makes it absolutely clear Wednesday 28 October 2009 that these leaks were only matters of “embarrassment” that were The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock “not…likely to undermine government’s effectiveness.” So why did a Cabinet Office director write to counter- terrorism asserting that there was PRAYERS “considerable damage to national security” from these stories and that [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] “the potential for future damage is significant”? Did the Cabinet Secretary, the Prime Minister or Ministers BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS know about this letter before it was sent, and was there any political pressure on civil servants to shut down RAF NIMROD MR2 AIRCRAFT XV230 those embarrassing stories? Resolved, That an humble Address be presented to Her Majesty, That Tessa Jowell: Neither report from Chief Inspector she will be graciously pleased to give directions that there be laid O’Connor nor from Sir Ian Johnston makes any claim before this House a Return of the Report, dated 28 October 2009, that the Cabinet Office exaggerated national security of the Independent Review into the broader issues surrounding claims; the right hon.
    [Show full text]
  • ND181 Waste Management in England
    House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee Waste management in England Fourth Report of Session 2014–15 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 15 October 2014 HC 241 Published on 22 October 2014 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and its associated bodies. Current membership Miss Anne McIntosh (Conservative, Thirsk and Malton) (Chair) Richard Drax (Conservative, South Dorset) Jim Fitzpatrick (Labour, Poplar and Limehouse) Mrs Mary Glindon (Labour, North Tyneside) Mrs Emma Lewell-Buck (Labour, South Shields) Iain McKenzie (Labour, Inverclyde) Sheryll Murray (Conservative, South East Cornwall) Neil Parish (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Ms Margaret Ritchie (Social Democratic and Labour Party, South Down) Mr Mark Spencer (Conservative, Sherwood) Roger Williams (Liberal Democrat, Brecon and Radnorshire) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk Home page - UK Parliament. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee - UK Parliament and by The Stationary Office by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is publishe d on the Committee’s website at Waste management in England - UK Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Childhood Review:Child Review
    Contents About the Childhood Review 2 Introduction by David Willetts 3 1. Children and the outside world 4 2. Happy and resilient children 9 3. Risk, play and adventure 13 Conclusion 17 Appendix 18 A report from the Childhood Review 1 About the Childhood Review The publication of “An Overview of Child Well-Being in Rich Countries” by UNICEF in February 2007 showed Britain is the worst place for children to live in the developed world. Our children are unhappier, have poorer relationships with their friends and family, are unhealthier and are more prone to risky behaviour than in other countries. In response, David Cameron asked David Willetts to conduct a review into how we can make things better for our children. This publication “More Ball Games” is the second in a series of working papers by the Childhood Review that diagnose the problems children face. The Childhood Review was helped by the work of Julian Brazier TD MP, Alistair Burt MP, Nick Gibb MP, Tim Loughton MP,Anne McIntosh MP, Maria Miller MP and Baroness Morris. The Review has been advised by an expert advisory panel, consisting of Sir Richard Bowlby, Baroness Susan Greenfield, Sue Palmer, Tim Gill, Lord Richard Best and Bob Reitemeier. The advisory panel are in no way affiliated with the Conservative Party and neither the panel nor their affiliated bodies have endorsed the findings of the Childhood Review. The research team for the Childhood Review includes Ryan Shorthouse, Melanie Batley and Christopher Cook. This document is not a statement of party policy but a set of recommendations to the Shadow Cabinet.
    [Show full text]