DOCSLIB.ORG

The Market for Liberty

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Market for Liberty THE MARKET FOR MORRIS AND LINDA TANNEHILL LIBERTY Copyright © 1970 by Morris and Linda Tannehill P. O. Box 1383 Lansing, Michigan 48904 All rights reserved. First Printing, March, 1970 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments iv PART I—The Great Conflict 1 Chapter 1. If We Don't Know Where We're Going 2 2. Man and Society 6 3. The Self-Regulating Market 16 4. Government—An Unnecessary Evil 32 PART II—A Laissez-Faire Society 43 Chapter 5. A Free and Healthy Economy 44 6. Property—The Great Problem Solver 54 7. Arbitration of Disputes 65 8. Protection of Life and Property 77 9. Dealing With Coercion 88 10. Rectification of Injustice 101 11. Warring Defense Agencies and Organized Crime 109 12. Legislation and Objective Law 116 13. Foreign Aggression 126 14. The Abolition of War 136 PART III—How Do We Get There? 149 Chapter 15. From Government to Laissez Faire 150 16. The Force Which Shapes the World 160 Acknowledgments The authors wish to express their gratitude to Skye d'Aureous and Natalee Hall for numerous ideas and suggestions (including Mr. d'Aureous' ideas on data banks for intellectual property, educational TV, and the interest of insurance companies in medical and drug safety); to Roy A. Childs, Jr., for several philosophical arguments against statism; and to Anthony I.S. Alexander for the concept of monetary reparations for coercive injustices and the idea that justice consists of rectifying the injustice insofar as is humanly possible, the idea that property ownership is the solution to pollutioil problems, the idea that Ayn Rand's "competing governments" argument against anarchy is actually a devastating argument against government, and for many hours of fruitful discussion. PART I THE GREAT CONFLICT "Since late Neolithic times, men in their political capacity have lived almost exclusively by myths."—Dr. James J. Martin 1 If We Don't Know Where We're Going . If we don't know where we're going, chances are we won't get there! Our world is increasingly stirred with dissatisfication. Myriads of people on every continent are whispering or shouting or writing or rioting their discontent with the structures of their societies. And they have a lot to be dissatisfied with—poverty which increases in step with increasingly expensive anti-poverty programs, endlessly heavier burdens of taxation and regulation piled on by unmindful bureaucrats, the long death-agonies of meaningless mini-wars, the terrible, iron- fisted knock of secret police . Youth are especially dissatisfied. Many long to turn the world upside down, in hopes that a better, freer, more humane society will emerge. But improvements in man's condition never come as a result of blind hope, pious prayers, or random chance; they are the product of knowledge and thought. Those who are dissatisfied must discover what sort of being man is and, from this, what kind of society is re- quired for him to function most efficiently and happily. If they are unwilling to accept this intellectual responsibility, they will only suc- ceed in exchanging our present troubles for new, and probably worse, ones. An increasing number of people are beginning to suspect that governmental actions are the cause of many of our social ills. Pro- ductive citizens, on whom the prosperity of nations depends, resent being told (in ever more minute detail) how to run their business and their lives. Youth resent being drafted into involuntary servitude as hired killers. The poor are finding, to their bitter disappointment, that government can bleed the economy into anemia but that all its grandiose promises and expensive programs can do nothing but freeze them in their misery. And everyone is hurt by the accelerating spiral of taxes and inflation. Nearly everyone is against some governmental actions, and an increasing number want to cut the size of government anywhere from slightly to drastically. There are even a few who have come to believe that it is not just certain governmental activities, nor even the size of If We Don t Know Where We're Going ... 3 the government, but the very existence of government which is causing the problems. These individuals are convinced that if we want to be permanently free of government-caused ills we must get rid of government itself. Within this broad anti-statist faction, there are plenty of "activists" who march or protest or just dream and scheme about means of bringing part or all of the governmental system crashing down. Although these anti-authoritarian individuals have taken a firm and well-justified stand against the injustice of government, few of them have an explicitly clear idea of what they are for. They want to tear down the old society and build a better one, but most of them hold only hazy and contradictory ideas of what this better society would be like and what its structure should be. But if we have no clear idea of what our goals are, we can hardly expect to achieve them. If we bring our present authoritarian sys- tem crashing down around our ears withour formulating and dis- seminating valid ideas about how society will operate satisfactorily without governmental rule, all that will result is confusion, ending in chaos. Then people, bewildered and frightened and still convinced that the traditional governmental system was right and necessary in spite of its glaring flaws, will demand a strong leader, and a Hitler will rise to answer their plea. So we'll be far worse off than we were before, because we will have to contend with both the destruction resulting from the chaos and a dictator with great popular support. The force which shapes men's lives and builds societies is not the destructive power of protests and revolutions but the productive power of rational ideas. Before anything can be produced—from a stone axe to a social system—someone must first have an idea of what to aim for and how to go about achieving it. Ideas must precede all production and all action. For this reason, ideas are the most power- ful (though often the most underestimated) force in man's world. This is a book about an idea—the discovery of what kind of society man needs in order to function most efficiently and happily . and how to achieve that society. It is a book about freedom— what it really is and implies, why man needs it, what it can do for him, and how to build and maintain a truly free society. We are not envisioning any Utopia, in which no man ever tries to victimize another. As long as men are human, they will be free to choose to act in an irrational and immoral manner against their fellows, and there will probably always be some who act as brutes, inflicting their will upon others by force. What we are proposing is a system for dealing with such men which is far superior to our present governmental one—a system which makes the violation of 4 The Market for Liberty human liberty far more difficult and less rewarding for all who want to live as brutes, and downright impossible for those who want to be politicians. Nor are we proposing a "perfect" society (whatever that is). Men are fallible, so mistakes will always be made, and there will never be a society of total equity. Under the present governmental system, however, blunders and aggressive intrusions into the lives of peaceful individuals tend to feed on themselves and to grow automatically, so that what starts as a small injustice (a tax, a regulation, a bureau, etc.) inevitably becomes a colossus in time. In a truly free society, blunders and aggressions would tend to be self-correcting, because men who are free to choose will not deal with individuals and firms which are stupid, offensive, or dangerous to those they do business with. The society we propose is based on one fundamental principle: No man or group of men—including any group of men calling them- selves "the government"—is morally entitled to initiate (that is, to start) the use of physical force, the threat of force, or any substitute for force (such as fraud) against any other man or group of men. This means that no man, no gang, and no government may morally use force in even the smallest degree against even the most unimportant individual so long as that individual has not himself initiated force.1 Some individuals will choose to initiate force; how to deal with them justly occupies a major part of this book. But, although such aggres- sions will probably never by fully eliminated, rational men can con- struct a society which will discourage them rather than institutional- izing them as an integral part of its social structure. Of course, our knowledge of what a truly free society would be like is far from complete. When men are free to think and produce, they innovate and improve everything around them at a startling rate, which means that only the bare outlines of the structure and functioning of a free society can be seen prior to its actual establish- ment and operation. But more than enough can be reasoned out to prove that a truly free society—one in which the initiation of force would be dealt with justly instead of institutionalized in the form of a government—is feasible. By working from what is already known, it is possible to show in general how a free society would operate and to answer fully and satisfactorily the common questions about and objections to such a society.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Great Fiction 2Nd Edition.Indb
    Th e Great Fiction Th e Mises Institute dedicates this volume to all of its generous Supporters and wishes to thank these, in particular: Benefactors Susan B. McNiel, Mr. and Mrs. Donald M. Rembert, Sr., Steven R. Berger Mr. and Mrs. Gary J. Turpanjian, Juliana and Hunter Hastings Ryan Schmitt in Memory of William Norman Grigg Yousif Almoayyed and Budoor Kazim Patrons Anonymous, Behfar and Peiying Bastani in honor of those known and unknown who fi ght for liberty, Wayne Chapeskie, Carl S. Creager Th omas and Lisa Dierl, Reza Ektefaie, Willard and Donna Fischer Kevin R. Griffi n, Jeff and Jamie Haenggi, Jule R. Herbert, Jr. Albert L. Hillman, Jr., Hunter Lewis and Elizabeth Sidamon-Eristoff Arnold Lisio, MD in Memory of Margit von Mises, Arthur L. Loeb David McClain, Joseph Edward Paul Melville, Michael L. Merritt Gregory and Joy Morin, James Nardulli, Chris and Melodie Rufer, Leif Smith Dr. Th omas L. Wenck, Brian J. Wilton, Walter and Sharon Woodul III Donors Anonymous, Wesley and Terri Alexander Th omas T. Amlie making amends for grandfather Th omas Ryum Amlie William H. Anderson, John Bartel, Dr. Th omas Beazlie, Ryan Best Bob and Rita Bost, Rémi Boudreau, John Boyer, Michael L. Burks John L. Buttolph III, Prof. Paul Cantor, Terence Corcoran, Jim and Cherie Cox Paul Dietrich, Randall Dollahon and Kathleen Lacey, Jeff ery M. Doty Prof. Frank van Dun, Bill Eaton, David J. Emery, Eric Englund, John Rock Foster Dietmar Georg, Christopher Georgacas, Kevin Paul Hamilton Charles F. Hanes, Sheldon Hayer, Wilfrid Helms, Dr. Frederic Herman Adam W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of National Defense, Hoppe
    THE MYTH OF NATIONAL DEFENSE: ESSAYSONTHE THEORY AND HISTORY OF SECURITY PRODUCTION EDITED BY HANS-HERMANN HOPPE THE MYTH OF NATIONAL DEFENSE: ESSAYSONTHE THEORY AND HISTORY OF SECURITY PRODUCTION Copyright © 2003 by the Ludwig von Mises Institute Indexes prepared by Brad Edmonds All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of reprints in the context of reviews. For information write the Ludwig von Mises Institute, 518 West Magnolia Avenue, Auburn, Alabama 36832. ISBN: 0-945466-37-4 To the memory of Gustave de Molinari (1819–1911) Patrons The Mises Institute dedicates this volume to all of its generous donors, and in particular wishes to thank these Patrons: Don Printz, M.D., Mrs. Floy Johnson, Mr. and Mrs. R. Nelson Nash, Mr. Abe Siemens ^ Mr. Steven R. Berger, Mr. Douglas E. French, Mr. and Mrs. Richard D. Riemann (top dog™), Mr. and Mrs. Joseph P. Schirrick, Mr. and Mrs. Charles R. Sebrell, In memory of Jeannette Zummo, Mr. W.A. Richardson ^ Anonymous, Mr. Steven R. Berger, Mr. Richard Bleiberg, Mr. John Hamilton Bolstad, Mr. Herbert Borbe, Mr. and Mrs. John C. Cooke, Dr. Larry J. Eshelman, Bud Evans (Harley-Davidson of Reno), Mrs. Annabelle Fetterman, Mr. and Mrs. Willard Fischer, The Dolphin Sky Foundation, Mr. Frank W. Heemstra, Mr. Albert L. Hillman, Jr., Richard J. Kossmann, M.D., Mrs. Sarah Paris Kraft, Mr. David Kramer, Mr. Frederick L. Maier, Mr. and Mrs. William W. Massey, Jr., Mr. Norbert McLuckie, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • David Friedman and Libertarianism: a C Ritique
    LIBERTARIAN PAPERS VOL. 3, ART. NO. 35 (2011) DAVID FRIEDMAN AND LIBERTARIANISM: A CRITIQUE WALTER E. BLOCK* 1. Introduction There is not one philosophy of libertarianism, but rather there are two. One of them, the utilitarian, is predicated on the notion that the free economy tends to bring about that state of affairs which is preferred by all or at least most of its members; the one that maximized utility. The other school of libertarian thought is the deontological one. It is based on the non aggression principle (NAP), according to which no one may properly initiate violence against another person or his justly owned property. The latter is based upon homesteading and legitimate title transfers, such as those that emanate from free trade or gifts. Friedman (1989) is clearly in the former camp, and attempts to show the advantages of this thesis over the latter. In his chapter 41, the main focus of the present critique, this author explicitly criticizes the deontological theory. Well, not that explicitly, in that he never once quotes or cites a single advocate of principled libertarianism. Rather, he attributes views to this perspective which are all but straw men and then proceeds to demolish them, at least to his own satisfaction. The present paper will attempt to defend deontological libertarianism against his unscrupulous attacks on it, and then return the favor by subjecting his own utilitarian libertarianism, to critical scrutiny. But there will be one difference in method between his procedure and ours. We will not insult his side of the debate by referring to hearsay evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • WINTER 2014 Journal of Austrian Economics
    The VOL . 17 | NO . 4 QUARTERLY WINTER 2014 JOURNAL of AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS ARTICLES The Natural Rate of Interest Rule . 419 Erwin Rosen and Adrian Ravier Juan de Mariana and the Modern American Politics of Money: Salamanca, Cervantes, Jefferson, and the Austrian School . 442 Eric C. Graf The Depression of 1873–1879: An Austrian Perspective . 474 Patrick Newman Legal Polycentrism, the Circularity Problem, and the Regression Theorem of Institutional Development . 510 Jakub Bożydar Wiśniewski The Marginal Efficiency of Capital: A Comment . 519 Christopher Westley Book Review: Economists and the State: What Went Wrong By Timothy P . Roth . 525 Mark Thornton Book Review: Money: How the Destruction of the Dollar Threatens the Global Economy— and What We Can Do About It By Steve Forbes and Elizabeth Ames . 530 David Gordon Book Review: The Dollar Trap: How the U.S. Dollar Tightened Its Grip on Global Finance By Eswar S . Prasad . 535 George Bragues Book Review: Masters of the Universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics By Daniel Stedman Jones . 543 Greg Kaza FOUNDING EDITOR (formerly The Review of Austrian Economics), Murray N . Rothbard (1926–1995) EDITOR, Joseph T . Salerno, Pace University BOOK REVIEW EDITOR, Mark Thornton, Ludwig von Mises Institute ASSISTANT EDITOR, Timothy D . Terrell, Wofford College EDITORIAL BOARD D .T . Armentano, Emeritus, University of Hartford Randall G . Holcombe, Florida State University James Barth, Auburn University Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Emeritus, UNLV Robert Batemarco, Pace University Jesús Huerta de Soto, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Walter Block, Loyola University Jörg Guido Hülsmann, University of Angers Donald Bellante, University of South Florida Peter G .
    [Show full text]
  • NEW PERSPECTIVES on POLITICAL ECONOMY a Bilingual Interdisciplinary Journal Vol
    NEW PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICAL ECONOMY A bilingual interdisciplinary journal Vol. 13, No. 1–2, 2017 NEW PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICAL ECONOMY A bilingual interdisciplinary journal / Vol. 13, No. 1–2, 2017 New Perspectives on Political Economy is a peer-reviewed semi-annual bilingual interdisci- plinary journal, published since 2005 in Prague. The journal aims at contributing to schol- arship at the intersection of political science, political philosophy, political economy and law. The main objective of the journal is to enhance our understanding of private property-, market- and individual liberty-based perspectives in the respected sciences. We also belive that only via exchange among social scientists from different fields and cross-disciplinary research can we critically analyze and fully understand forces that drive policy-making and be able to spell out policy implications and consequences. The journal welcomes submis- sions of unpublished research papers, book reviews, and educational notes. Published by CEVRO Institute Academic Press EDITORIAL ADDRESS: New Perspectives on Political Economy CEVRO Institute, Jungmannova 17, 110 00 Praha 1, Czech Republic Manuscripts should be submitted electronically. All manuscripts and correspondence should be addressed to [email protected]. Full text available via DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals and also via EBSCO Publishing databases. INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS Authors submitting manuscripts should include abstracts of not more than 250 words and JEL classification codes. New Perspectives on Political Economy edits for clarity, brevity, and in accordance with the Chicago Manual of Style. Authors should use footnotes rather than endnotes or in-text references, and must include complete bibliographical information. Authors should include information on their titles and professional affiliations, along with e-mail address.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarian Perspectives on Policing and Punishment
    Forthcoming in the Routledge Companion to Libertarianism Libertarian perspectives on policing and punishment Jake Monaghan Libertarians are concerned primarily with the use or threat of force. Citizens are subjected to government force most directly through interactions with the criminal justice system. As usual, political reality diverges significantly from what libertarians think justice requires. This chapter offers an overview of libertarian perspectives on the administration of criminal justice. The essay proceeds in three stages, mirroring the criminal justice system. Section One asks, what is the legitimate scope of criminal law? This is followed in Section Two by its enforcement: how ought police enforce the criminal law? Given the seriously unjust nature of policing, ought policing to be merely reformed or abolished? Arrest is often followed by prosecution. Successful prosecution is followed by punishment, the topic of Section Three.1 Section Four concludes with some questions generated by failures of realized criminal justice systems. As a disclaimer, note that many of the arguments I will discuss are not distinctively libertarian or constitutive of the view, though they are closely associated with “hard” libertarian and classical liberal thought. 1. The scope of the criminal law Libertarianism, like any plausible normative political theory, takes power over another to be burdened by justification. This amounts to a presumptive constraint on the criminal law. There are a variety of foundations for this presumption (see the Foundations section of this volume). But how can any kind of police function be consistent with libertarian constraints on political power? The usual answer is that people will consent to the rules of a legal regime, or the law will be constrained to independently enforceable moral rules (Chartier 2013, 242).
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarianism
    Piero Vernaglione Libertarianism Index 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Self-ownership .......................................................................................................................................... 3 3. Property on tangible things ....................................................................................................................... 7 4. Non-aggression principle ........................................................................................................................ 11 5. Permissible actions .................................................................................................................................. 16 6. Liberty as property .................................................................................................................................. 19 7. Other implications of the theory ............................................................................................................. 22 Bibliography................................................................................................................................................ 31 Cite this essay as: P. Vernaglione, Libertarianism, in Rothbardiana, https://www.rothbard.it/teoria/libertarianism.pdf, May 31st, 2020. 2 Il libertarismo 1. Introduction Libertarianism1 is a political philosophy, therefore its field of investigation is the examination of
    [Show full text]
  • Response to J.C. Lester on David Friedman on Libertarian Theory
    MEST Journal DOI 10.12709/mest.07.07.01.17 RESPONSE TO J.C. LESTER ON DAVID FRIEDMAN ON LIBERTARIAN THEORY Walter E. Block Loyola University New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, USA ©MESTE JEL category: P10 Abstract This essay is written in support of my (Block, 2011A) critique of Friedman (1989) in response to Lester’s (2014) support of the latter. The debate concerns libertarianism, private property rights, crime, law and other issues of interest to libertarians. If you are not interested in the libertarian political-economic philosophy, nor debates, this would be a good time to stop reading. My main target in this article is Lester’s contention that rights can clash. If they may, we are left at sea without a rudder, since all we have, as libertarians, is the non-aggression principle plus private property rights based on initial homesteading. If these will not suffice to obviate any clash, then we have nothing in the cupboard. Another difficulty I have with this author is his defense of utilitarianism; my perspective, in sharp contrast to his, is deontological. While this article is highly critical of Lester, I do acknowledge that he makes several good points, on the basis of which I have had to revise my own views of these matters. For one thing, thanks to him, I have added violation of dignity to my theory of punishment. For another, he corrected a slip of mine about the right not to be murdered. So, it is hat’s off to Lester, as far as I am concerned, despite my many criticisms of him in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • The Machinery of Freedom: Guide to a Radical Capitalism
    Santa Clara Law Santa Clara Law Digital Commons Legal Monographs and Treatises Law Library Collections 4-19-1989 The aM chinery of Freedom: Guide to a Radical Capitalism David D. Friedman Santa Clara University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/monographs Automated Citation Friedman, David D., "The aM chinery of Freedom: Guide to a Radical Capitalism" (1989). Legal Monographs and Treatises. Book 2. http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/monographs/2 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Library Collections at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Legal Monographs and Treatises by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Machinery of Freedom THE MACHINERY OF FREEDOM GUIDE TO A RADICAL CAPITALISM second edition David Friedman This book is dedicated to Milton Friedman Friedrich Hayek Robert A. Heinlein, from whom I learned and to Robert M. Schuchman, who might have written it better Capitalism is the best. It's free enterprise. Barter. Gimbels, if I get really rank with the clerk, 'Well I don't like this', how I can resolve it? If it really gets ridiculous, I go, 'Frig it, man, I walk.' What can this guy do at Gimbels, even if he was the president of Gimbels? He can always reject me from that store, but I can always go to Macy's. He can't really hurt me. Communism is like one big phone company.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty Magazine September 1988
    "It is a strange desire to see/(power andto Cose Ci6erty." - ::Francis 'Bacon September 1988 $4.00 Volume 2, Number 1 WHY YOU PROBABLY WILL LOSE EVERYTHING IN T-HE COMING DEPRESSION Of course, you could be the excep­ lowed in ancient Rome, in Pre­ late Bernard Baruch, Davidson is through firsthand experience on the tion. Even in the Great Depression Napoleonic France, in Russia prior endowed with a Prodigious talent internationalscene. His worldwide a handful of people actually made to the Bolshevik Revolution, in for forecasting economic events. travels and contacts allow him to fortunes-the ones who heeded the Germany under Hitler's early rule, Davidson's first book, The analyze the U.S. economy from a advice of economic realists like and in the U. S. in the 1920s. Squeeze, wonpraise from Frederick truly unique perspective. Bernard Baruch, famed "Wizard of Now, bureaucrats and establish­ A. von Hayek, Nobel Prizewinner Wall Street." ment economists are again almost in Economics, as "one of the really And whatdoes that perspective Baruchtried to warn the public of frantic in their efforts to assure us significant contributions to its reveal? In Blood in the Streets, the coming economic disaster, but that there is no reason for concern. field." Davidson otTers virtually irrefu­ mostignoredhim. As a result, most History tells us this is a badsign; the table evidence that the U.S. will of the population failed to escape third step is practically upon us! Now, Davidson has written a soon enter a depression far the ravages ofthe Great Depression. In every age "experts" have in­ prophetic-and frightening-new greater than that of the 1930s­ sisted, right up to the fmal collapse, book, Bloodin the Streets, with his probably by 1990 at the latest.
    [Show full text]
  • Chaos Theory
    CHAOS THEORY CHAOS THEORY TWO ESSAYS ON MARKET ANARCHY by ROBE R T P. MU rp HY SECOND EDITION All men with honor are kings. But not all kings have honor. —Rob Roy (Liam Neeson) First edition © 2002 Robert P. Murphy Second edition © 2010 by the Ludwig von Mises Institute and published under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Ludwig von Mises Institute 518 West Magnolia Avenue Auburn, Alabama 36832 www.mises.org ISBN: 978-1-933550-65-7 Contents Preface to the Second Edition. 7 Private Law. .13 Private Defense. 43 Bibliography on Anarcho-Capitalism. .65 5 Preface to the Second Edition ack in late 2001, I wrote a series of articles on private law B for the website anti-state.com, which featured articles and a chat forum catering to anarcho-capitalists. I then wrote an essay on private defense—meaning how a free market would handle the problem of foreign military invasion—which I submitted to Jeremy Sapienza, the editor of the website, for inclusion in his printed magazine. Jeremy wrote back that the essay was too important for a magazine with limited circulation, and urged me to turn it into a book. Thus Chaos Theory was born. (The title was Jeremy’s idea also.) Being an unpublished author and driven by completely unreal- istic assumptions of the demand for an underground pamphlet on market anarchy, I naturally elected to self-publish the first edition of Chaos Theory, through RJ Communications in New York City. I was going to grad school at NYU at the time, so it was easy for me to visit their offices and see that they actually existed before sending them a check.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarian Forum
    A Semi-Monthly Newsletter THE Libertarian Forum Joseph R. Peden, Publisher Murray N. Rothbard, Editor VOLUME 11, NOS. 22-23 NOVEMBER 15 - DECEMBER 1, 1970 35C THE ELECTIONS We live in a time of increasingly intense and unpre- bers, etc., they also have a great need to revere their dictable changes in attitudes and values, a time when a valid President, to consider him as a wise authority figure analysis of existing social and ideological trends may be a bit above the battle. And so the brawling nature of the completely outmoded a few months later. Who, for example, Nixon-Agnew campaign put the Middle American voters could have predicted last spring that the flourishing anti- off, discomfited them, made their wise authority images war movement would now be dead as a dodo? Dead.. .or seem too much like local wardheelers for comfort. Fur- dormant? Any analysis of the November elections has to thermore, the Democrats were able to draw the teeth keep this humbling fact in mind. of Agnewism by shifting notably rightward, by stressing Be that as it may, the press has underestimated the their own devotion to "law and order". Thus, the clumsy crushing defeat suffered by the Nixon Administration. attempt by the Republicans to turn such a generally Despite an ardent nation-wide galvanizing effort by Nixon revered and moderate figure as Adlai Stevenson into a and Agnew, despite their continual hammering at the seem- crypto-Weatherman backfired badly by making the Repub- ingly popular issue of polarization against the Left, despite licans rather ridiculous, a backfiring that also beset Agnew's enormously greater financing and a demoralized Democratic attempts at rhetorical alliteration.
    [Show full text]