Issue 167, 4Th Quarter, 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Issue 167, 4Th Quarter, 2015 s Whole Number 167 “If one takes care of the means, the end will take care of itself” 4th Quarter 2015 Voluntary Government as a vestige of political protection, not even as represented by constitutionally limited, representative republican Marketable Service: Reminiscences government. He was apparently the first person to realize on the History of an Idea that the market economy contained the means for its By Alvin Lowi [1] own protection and to advance a theory of a society Back in 1954, when he was at the Foundation for entirely devoid of political regimentation, which is to Economic Education at Irvington-on-Hudson, New say, a society without a state. York, economist Baldy Harper called the idea of Molinari envisioned a stable and humane social voluntary government a most radical one. [2] At that paradigm. He took individual human liberty to the limit time, Harper said he could count on the fingers of one to see if it could stand on its own legs. Libertarians hand all the people he knew in the world who nowadays call this position individualist anarchy, market entertained the notion of a “total alternative” to tax- anarchism, or anarcho-capitalism. Society without funded government. Spencer Heath, Spencer political statecraft has also been referred to variously as MacCallum, Robert LeFevre, and Murray Rothbard economic government, voluntary government, or were the only ones who came to his mind. [3] Today, government via market-delivered property protection given the Internet, there are probably tens of thousands, services. maybe even millions, who entertain this notion, at least The Free Enterprise Institute furtively. Yet, the history of the idea, its inception and My colleague Galambos came to think like Molinari spread, is sketchy and tentative. about a century later . He did so apparently without a My encounter with this idea began when my friend prompt from Molinari - but not without some prompting and colleague, Andrew J. Galambos, introduced me to from his students. Even so, this was a remarkable Spencer Heath. [4] At the time, 1961, I was associated transition for Galambos, who had no academic with Galambos and his Free Enterprise Institute. There, I preparation in the humanities. He was an astronomer and was privileged to observe and participate in the astrophysicist who left the government-dominated development and exposition of such ideas. I had always defense industry in 1959, during the height of the Cold known this was a unique opportunity, but until recently War, to return to academia to make the world safe for had not thought to memorialize the experience. I was astrophysicists. In 1960, while still a tenured physics prompted to do so when I recently discovered a reprint professor, he launched his campaign, “Capitalism, The of J. Huston McCulloch's 1977 translation from the Key to Survival.” This was a short-lived seminar at French of a remarkable essay entitled THE Whittier College where he taught, but it was soon PRODUCTION OF SECURITY. [5] I found the essay, transformed into a profit-seeking educational enterprise written in 1849, a most compelling read in itself, and the in Los Angeles under the banner of The Free Enterprise inspiring introduction by Murray Rothbard made it Institute (FEI) and continued for several decades. virtually irresistible to put down. It brought to mind Galambos died in 1997 after a long illness. In 1999, some of the experiences I had almost forgotten. some of his taped FEI lectures were transcribed and The author of the essay was an obscure laissez-faire published in a volume entitled SIC ITUR AD ASTRA. economist from Belgium named Gustave de Molinari On founding FEI, Galambos embraced the limited (1819-1912), a contemporary and intellectual kin of the government framework of classical liberalism. He was better known French liberal political economist, Frederic an enthusiastic promoter of the writings of Mises, Read, Bastiat. Born in Belgium and educated there in the new Hazlitt, Harper, Hayek, and Rothbard. In the early academic field of economics, Molinari was associated 1960s, he brought Read, Mises, and Harper to Southern with the French économistes, a group of laissez-faire California for well-attended seminars. Galambos was liberals recognizable nowadays as a rare breed: pro- obsessed with American constitutionalism. He had a capitalist, non-political libertarians. Throughout his long strong sentimental attachment to the American life (he was 92 when he died), Molinari argued for Revolution as fomented by Thomas Paine, which peace, free trade, freedom of speech, freedom of represented for him the break with old-world political association, and liberty in all its forms. despotism and elitism and especially the break-through Molinari was unique among economists in his in social technology that resulted, enabling the liberation conviction that the economy did not need the slightest (continued on page 5) SECURITY, partially reprinted in Issue 35 of THE VOLUNTARYIST.) However, Molinari made no mention of the role of insurance. That idea appears to Editor: Carl Watner have first been expressed more than 100 years later by Webmaster: Dave Scotese someone else, as will be described below. When I received a copy of an email from subscriber Subscription Information Richard Boren in September 2014, I had already been Published quarterly by The Voluntaryists, P.O. Box 275, Gramling, SC 29348. A six-issue subscription is thinking about the pivotal role that defense and insurance $25. For overseas postage, please add $5. Single back companies would play in a state-free society. Richard issues are $5. Gold, silver, and bitcoin readily accepted. had written that email to Hans-Hermann Hoppe, the Please check the number on your mailing label to see when you should renew. Carl Watner grants permission author of a book, DEMOCRACY, THE GOD THAT to reprint his own articles without special request. THE FAILED, he had recently read. That book, first VOLUNTARYIST is online at www.voluntaryist.com. published in 2001, placed heavy emphasis on the role of insurance companies in a free society. In it Hoppe gave Insurance Companies as credit to Morris and Linda Tannehill for their “brilliant Competing Governments: Whose insights and analysis” in that regard, as expressed in their Idea Was It? 1970 book, THE MARKET FOR LIBERTY. The purpose of Boren’s email to Hoppe was to suggest that By Richard Boren perhaps the Tannehills were not the true source of the [Editor’s Note: As some of you may know, I operate ideas he so greatly admired. I suggested to Richard that a small retail tire store and auto service center. Several he write an article on the history of the insurance problems in the store involve questions regarding the concept, and he offered me the following.] sale of used tires and the proper way to repair punctured tires. If a customer brings in a tire with plenty of tread, I first heard the idea that insurance companies would but which was manufactured ten years ago, is it safe to play an important role in a state-free society in 1975, install? Should a tire be ‘plugged’ from the outside or while taking Course V-50 at the Free Enterprise Institute must it be inspected and repaired from the inside? These (FEI). The concept had been taught there for over 10 are questions the tire industry is struggling to answer. years, which is to say about five years before the Many leading tire associations look to the federal and/or Tannehills published their book. My instructor was state governments to offer legislative and regulatory Senior Lecturer Jay Stuart Snelson (1936-2011). He did solutions. When I suggested to the editor of a tire a superb job of teaching concepts innovated by Andrew magazine that the insurance companies should set these J. Galambos (1924-1997) and others in what was labeled standards, he responded: “Where did you ever get that the Science of Volition. Galambos had founded the idea from?” Well, I got it from several decades of Institute, a profit-seeking venture, in the early 1960s. I studying and thinking about voluntaryist solutions to was so taken by what I learned there that I took classes societal problems. continually for four years, all but the first taught In a state-free market economy it would only be personally by Galambos. FEI operated under Galambos’ natural for insurance companies to establish safety and direct management until the mid-1980s when he was procedural standards for those that they insure. Among sidelined by Alzheimer’s disease. other things they would probably fund organizations like Prior to reading Hoppe’s book, I had never heard of Underwriters Laboratory and Consumers’ Union to test the Tannehills but was inspired to purchase their book. products and to establish minimum requirements for What they had written about insurance companies obtaining insurance. Thus, rather than the state dictating sounded a lot like what I had learned from Galambos. I the rules regarding tire aging, tire repair, (and thousands tried to find out more about the authors but hit a dead of other standards, such as the way to store explosive end. I could find no mention of them anywhere, other fertilizers or the use of seat belts and air bags in autos), it than references to their book. It didn't appear that they would be the insurers of these products and procedures had written anything before THE MARKET FOR that would be responsible. After all, they would have a LIBERTY, or anything since. Apparently the book was large amount at stake should an insurable event occur quite successful in libertarian circles when it first came and cause them a loss. out. I asked myself, “Who comes out of nowhere, writes In a voluntaryist world, by definition, all products a well-received book, and then disappears?” The answer, and services would be provided via private, voluntary as far as I know, is pretty much limited to J.D.
Recommended publications
  • Libertarian Party at Sea on Land
    Libertarian Party at Sea on Land To Mom who taught me the Golden Rule and Henry George 121 years ahead of his time and still counting Libertarian Party at Sea on Land Author: Harold Kyriazi Book ISBN: 978-1-952489-02-0 First Published 2000 Robert Schalkenbach Foundation Official Publishers of the works of Henry George The Robert Schalkenbach Foundation (RSF) is a private operating foundation, founded in 1925, to promote public awareness of the social philosophy and economic reforms advocated by famed 19th century thinker and activist, Henry George. Today, RSF remains true to its founding doctrine, and through efforts focused on education, communities, outreach, and publishing, works to create a world in which all people are afforded the basic necessities of life and the natural world is protected for generations to come. ROBERT SCHALKENBACH FOUND ATION Robert Schalkenbach Foundation [email protected] www.schalkenbach.org Libertarian Party at Sea on Land By Harold Kyriazi ROBERT SCHALKENBACH FOUNDATION New York City 2020 Acknowledgments Dan Sullivan, my longtime fellow Pittsburgher and geo-libertarian, not only introduced me to this subject about seven years ago, but has been a wonderful teacher and tireless consultant over the years since then. I’m deeply indebted to him, and appreciative of his steadfast efforts to enlighten his fellow libertarians here in Pittsburgh and elsewhere. Robin Robertson, a fellow geo-libertarian whom I met at the 1999 Council of Georgist Organizations Conference, gave me detailed constructive criticism on an early draft, brought Ayn Rand’s essay on the broadcast spectrum to my attention, helped conceive the cover illustration, and helped in other ways too numerous to mention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Fiction 2Nd Edition.Indb
    Th e Great Fiction Th e Mises Institute dedicates this volume to all of its generous Supporters and wishes to thank these, in particular: Benefactors Susan B. McNiel, Mr. and Mrs. Donald M. Rembert, Sr., Steven R. Berger Mr. and Mrs. Gary J. Turpanjian, Juliana and Hunter Hastings Ryan Schmitt in Memory of William Norman Grigg Yousif Almoayyed and Budoor Kazim Patrons Anonymous, Behfar and Peiying Bastani in honor of those known and unknown who fi ght for liberty, Wayne Chapeskie, Carl S. Creager Th omas and Lisa Dierl, Reza Ektefaie, Willard and Donna Fischer Kevin R. Griffi n, Jeff and Jamie Haenggi, Jule R. Herbert, Jr. Albert L. Hillman, Jr., Hunter Lewis and Elizabeth Sidamon-Eristoff Arnold Lisio, MD in Memory of Margit von Mises, Arthur L. Loeb David McClain, Joseph Edward Paul Melville, Michael L. Merritt Gregory and Joy Morin, James Nardulli, Chris and Melodie Rufer, Leif Smith Dr. Th omas L. Wenck, Brian J. Wilton, Walter and Sharon Woodul III Donors Anonymous, Wesley and Terri Alexander Th omas T. Amlie making amends for grandfather Th omas Ryum Amlie William H. Anderson, John Bartel, Dr. Th omas Beazlie, Ryan Best Bob and Rita Bost, Rémi Boudreau, John Boyer, Michael L. Burks John L. Buttolph III, Prof. Paul Cantor, Terence Corcoran, Jim and Cherie Cox Paul Dietrich, Randall Dollahon and Kathleen Lacey, Jeff ery M. Doty Prof. Frank van Dun, Bill Eaton, David J. Emery, Eric Englund, John Rock Foster Dietmar Georg, Christopher Georgacas, Kevin Paul Hamilton Charles F. Hanes, Sheldon Hayer, Wilfrid Helms, Dr. Frederic Herman Adam W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth of National Defense, Hoppe
    THE MYTH OF NATIONAL DEFENSE: ESSAYSONTHE THEORY AND HISTORY OF SECURITY PRODUCTION EDITED BY HANS-HERMANN HOPPE THE MYTH OF NATIONAL DEFENSE: ESSAYSONTHE THEORY AND HISTORY OF SECURITY PRODUCTION Copyright © 2003 by the Ludwig von Mises Institute Indexes prepared by Brad Edmonds All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of reprints in the context of reviews. For information write the Ludwig von Mises Institute, 518 West Magnolia Avenue, Auburn, Alabama 36832. ISBN: 0-945466-37-4 To the memory of Gustave de Molinari (1819–1911) Patrons The Mises Institute dedicates this volume to all of its generous donors, and in particular wishes to thank these Patrons: Don Printz, M.D., Mrs. Floy Johnson, Mr. and Mrs. R. Nelson Nash, Mr. Abe Siemens ^ Mr. Steven R. Berger, Mr. Douglas E. French, Mr. and Mrs. Richard D. Riemann (top dog™), Mr. and Mrs. Joseph P. Schirrick, Mr. and Mrs. Charles R. Sebrell, In memory of Jeannette Zummo, Mr. W.A. Richardson ^ Anonymous, Mr. Steven R. Berger, Mr. Richard Bleiberg, Mr. John Hamilton Bolstad, Mr. Herbert Borbe, Mr. and Mrs. John C. Cooke, Dr. Larry J. Eshelman, Bud Evans (Harley-Davidson of Reno), Mrs. Annabelle Fetterman, Mr. and Mrs. Willard Fischer, The Dolphin Sky Foundation, Mr. Frank W. Heemstra, Mr. Albert L. Hillman, Jr., Richard J. Kossmann, M.D., Mrs. Sarah Paris Kraft, Mr. David Kramer, Mr. Frederick L. Maier, Mr. and Mrs. William W. Massey, Jr., Mr. Norbert McLuckie, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Paper on Tax Reform (Pdf)
    CSI Policy Study Civil Society Institute • Santa Clara University 500 El Camino Real • Santa Clara, CA 95053 • [email protected] • 408/554-6931 January 2006 The Ultimate Tax Reform: Public Revenue from Land Rent by Fred E. Foldvary** The U.S. tax system is widely perceived as too complex, too intrusive, and too demanding of workers’ paychecks. Taxes today claim a greater share of the average family’s budget than food, clothing, housing, and transportation combined.1 In 2005, the average American had to work 107 days just to pay taxes, compared to 44 days in 1930.2 Tax reform proposals, not surprisingly, are popular among voters and the politicians who If land value is taxed, the land will not represent them. President George W. Bush flee, shrink, or hide. A tax on land created an advisory panel on tax reform. value has no deadweight loss. Some economists and institutes have proposed reforms to flatten and simplify the income tax, or to replace it entirely with a national sales or consumption tax or value-added tax. These would be an improvement, but if we seek to reform taxes, we should consider all the possibilities and choose, as Milton Friedman puts it, the “least bad” tax. Even a relatively flat income tax imposes what economists call a “deadweight loss” or “excess burden” on society. Taxes on productive activity increase the price of labor or goods beyond economic costs, and so reduce the quantity provided. This reduction in production, income, and * Fred Foldvary received his Ph.D. in economics from George Mason University in Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • David Friedman and Libertarianism: a C Ritique
    LIBERTARIAN PAPERS VOL. 3, ART. NO. 35 (2011) DAVID FRIEDMAN AND LIBERTARIANISM: A CRITIQUE WALTER E. BLOCK* 1. Introduction There is not one philosophy of libertarianism, but rather there are two. One of them, the utilitarian, is predicated on the notion that the free economy tends to bring about that state of affairs which is preferred by all or at least most of its members; the one that maximized utility. The other school of libertarian thought is the deontological one. It is based on the non aggression principle (NAP), according to which no one may properly initiate violence against another person or his justly owned property. The latter is based upon homesteading and legitimate title transfers, such as those that emanate from free trade or gifts. Friedman (1989) is clearly in the former camp, and attempts to show the advantages of this thesis over the latter. In his chapter 41, the main focus of the present critique, this author explicitly criticizes the deontological theory. Well, not that explicitly, in that he never once quotes or cites a single advocate of principled libertarianism. Rather, he attributes views to this perspective which are all but straw men and then proceeds to demolish them, at least to his own satisfaction. The present paper will attempt to defend deontological libertarianism against his unscrupulous attacks on it, and then return the favor by subjecting his own utilitarian libertarianism, to critical scrutiny. But there will be one difference in method between his procedure and ours. We will not insult his side of the debate by referring to hearsay evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • WINTER 2014 Journal of Austrian Economics
    The VOL . 17 | NO . 4 QUARTERLY WINTER 2014 JOURNAL of AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS ARTICLES The Natural Rate of Interest Rule . 419 Erwin Rosen and Adrian Ravier Juan de Mariana and the Modern American Politics of Money: Salamanca, Cervantes, Jefferson, and the Austrian School . 442 Eric C. Graf The Depression of 1873–1879: An Austrian Perspective . 474 Patrick Newman Legal Polycentrism, the Circularity Problem, and the Regression Theorem of Institutional Development . 510 Jakub Bożydar Wiśniewski The Marginal Efficiency of Capital: A Comment . 519 Christopher Westley Book Review: Economists and the State: What Went Wrong By Timothy P . Roth . 525 Mark Thornton Book Review: Money: How the Destruction of the Dollar Threatens the Global Economy— and What We Can Do About It By Steve Forbes and Elizabeth Ames . 530 David Gordon Book Review: The Dollar Trap: How the U.S. Dollar Tightened Its Grip on Global Finance By Eswar S . Prasad . 535 George Bragues Book Review: Masters of the Universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics By Daniel Stedman Jones . 543 Greg Kaza FOUNDING EDITOR (formerly The Review of Austrian Economics), Murray N . Rothbard (1926–1995) EDITOR, Joseph T . Salerno, Pace University BOOK REVIEW EDITOR, Mark Thornton, Ludwig von Mises Institute ASSISTANT EDITOR, Timothy D . Terrell, Wofford College EDITORIAL BOARD D .T . Armentano, Emeritus, University of Hartford Randall G . Holcombe, Florida State University James Barth, Auburn University Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Emeritus, UNLV Robert Batemarco, Pace University Jesús Huerta de Soto, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Walter Block, Loyola University Jörg Guido Hülsmann, University of Angers Donald Bellante, University of South Florida Peter G .
    [Show full text]
  • NEW PERSPECTIVES on POLITICAL ECONOMY a Bilingual Interdisciplinary Journal Vol
    NEW PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICAL ECONOMY A bilingual interdisciplinary journal Vol. 13, No. 1–2, 2017 NEW PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICAL ECONOMY A bilingual interdisciplinary journal / Vol. 13, No. 1–2, 2017 New Perspectives on Political Economy is a peer-reviewed semi-annual bilingual interdisci- plinary journal, published since 2005 in Prague. The journal aims at contributing to schol- arship at the intersection of political science, political philosophy, political economy and law. The main objective of the journal is to enhance our understanding of private property-, market- and individual liberty-based perspectives in the respected sciences. We also belive that only via exchange among social scientists from different fields and cross-disciplinary research can we critically analyze and fully understand forces that drive policy-making and be able to spell out policy implications and consequences. The journal welcomes submis- sions of unpublished research papers, book reviews, and educational notes. Published by CEVRO Institute Academic Press EDITORIAL ADDRESS: New Perspectives on Political Economy CEVRO Institute, Jungmannova 17, 110 00 Praha 1, Czech Republic Manuscripts should be submitted electronically. All manuscripts and correspondence should be addressed to [email protected]. Full text available via DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals and also via EBSCO Publishing databases. INFORMATION FOR AUTHORS Authors submitting manuscripts should include abstracts of not more than 250 words and JEL classification codes. New Perspectives on Political Economy edits for clarity, brevity, and in accordance with the Chicago Manual of Style. Authors should use footnotes rather than endnotes or in-text references, and must include complete bibliographical information. Authors should include information on their titles and professional affiliations, along with e-mail address.
    [Show full text]
  • By C. Lowell Harriss
    25 Rothbard's Anarcho-Capitalist Critique BY C. LOWELL HARRISS Professional economists who were contemporaries of Henry George generally opposed his views. Other chapters in this volume discuss the leading examples. More recently, in academe as well as elsewhere, there has developed support for property-tax revision along the lines he so fervently advocated—much greater reliance on site values and a corresponding reduction in burdens on capital and other products of human labor. Land-value taxation relates to countless issues of (local) government finance, including many types of distress in urban areas; land-use policies, the environment, energy, and "externalities" of endless variety are related in one way or another to present and potential taxes on land. For dealing with these and other matters, all potentially useful insights deserve attention—George's as well as those of his critics who have claim to competence. Among contemporary economists, few if any have written more extensively in explicit criticism of George's work than has Murray N. Rothbard, widely recognized as a leading libertarian and student of Ludwig von Mises. He explains in the preface to Power and Market that he devotes more attention than is now customary to this topic because "the Georgists are correct in noting that their important claims are never mentioned, much less refuted, in current works. " I His critique draws heavily upon analyses made by two other writers—Frank H. Knight (1885-1972), in his day one of America's foremost economists,' and Spencer Heath (1876-1963), a successful inventor and patent attorney who published a book and several pamphlets in the field of social and political theory.' Rothbard's statement of his basic position, that ".
    [Show full text]
  • MAN, ECONOMY, and STATE with POWER and MARKET by Joseph Stromberg
    MAN, ECONOMY, AND STATE ATREATISE ON ECONOMIC PRINCIPLES WITH POWER AND MARKET GOVERNMENT AND THE ECONOMY MURRAY N. ROTHBARD SCHOLAR’S EDITION Man, Economy, and State: Copyright 1962 by William Volker Fund and D. Van Nostrand Copyright 1970 by Murray N. Rothbard Copyright 1993 by Murray N. Rothbard, revised edition Copyright 2001 by Ludwig von Mises Institute Copyright 2004 by Ludwig von Mises Institute, second edition, Scholar’s Edition Power and Market: Copyright 1970 by Institute for Humane Studies Copyright 1977 by Institute for Humane Studies, second edition Copyright 2004 by Ludwig von Mises Institute, third edition, Scholar’s Edition All rights reserved. Written permission must be secured from the publisher to use or reproduce any part of this book, except for brief quotations in critical reviews or articles. Published by the Ludwig von Mises Institute, 518 West Magnolia Avenue, Auburn, Alabama 36832-4528. ISBN: 0-945466-30-7 TO Ludwig von Mises (Man, Economy, and State) AND TO Libertarians of the Past, who Blazed the Trail and to Libertarians of the Future, who Shall Overcome (Power and Market) The Ludwig von Mises Institute dedicates this volume to all of its generous donors and wishes to thank these Patrons, in particular: George W. Connell Andreas Acavalos, Richard Bleiberg, John Hamilton Bolstad, Louis Carabini (Monex International), Anthony Deden (Sage Capital Zurich AG), Mrs. Floy Johnson, Neil Kaethler, Mr. and Mrs. R. Nelson Nash Mr. and Mrs. J.R. Bost, Dr. John Brätland, William H. Conn, Carl Creager, Dr. and Mrs. George G. Eddy, Douglas E. French, John R. Harper, Roland Manarin, Ronald Mandle, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Market for Liberty
    THE MARKET FOR MORRIS AND LINDA TANNEHILL LIBERTY Copyright © 1970 by Morris and Linda Tannehill P. O. Box 1383 Lansing, Michigan 48904 All rights reserved. First Printing, March, 1970 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments iv PART I—The Great Conflict 1 Chapter 1. If We Don't Know Where We're Going 2 2. Man and Society 6 3. The Self-Regulating Market 16 4. Government—An Unnecessary Evil 32 PART II—A Laissez-Faire Society 43 Chapter 5. A Free and Healthy Economy 44 6. Property—The Great Problem Solver 54 7. Arbitration of Disputes 65 8. Protection of Life and Property 77 9. Dealing With Coercion 88 10. Rectification of Injustice 101 11. Warring Defense Agencies and Organized Crime 109 12. Legislation and Objective Law 116 13. Foreign Aggression 126 14. The Abolition of War 136 PART III—How Do We Get There? 149 Chapter 15. From Government to Laissez Faire 150 16. The Force Which Shapes the World 160 Acknowledgments The authors wish to express their gratitude to Skye d'Aureous and Natalee Hall for numerous ideas and suggestions (including Mr. d'Aureous' ideas on data banks for intellectual property, educational TV, and the interest of insurance companies in medical and drug safety); to Roy A. Childs, Jr., for several philosophical arguments against statism; and to Anthony I.S. Alexander for the concept of monetary reparations for coercive injustices and the idea that justice consists of rectifying the injustice insofar as is humanly possible, the idea that property ownership is the solution to pollutioil problems, the idea that Ayn Rand's "competing governments" argument against anarchy is actually a devastating argument against government, and for many hours of fruitful discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Reading
    FAITH SEEKING FREEDOM Libertarian Christian Answers to Tough Questions FURTHER READING Faith Seeking Freedom For Further Reading 1 Chapter 1 Why Should I Care about Politics? FURTHER READING “New Testament Theology of the State, Part 1 and Part 2” | Norman Horn (Libertarian Christian Institute, 2008) Bible and Government: Public Policy from a Christian Perspective | John Cobin (Alertness Books, 2003) Christian Theology of Public Policy: Highlighting the American Experience | John Cobin (Alertness Books, 2006) Resisting Babel: Allegiance to God and the Problem of Government | John Mark Hicks, ed. (Abilene Christian University Press, 2020) “Jesus Wasn’t a Libertarian (but He’s Glad I Am!)” | Doug Stuart (Libertarian Christian Institute, 2018) Kingdom Conspiracy: Returning to the Radical Mission of the Local Church | Scot McKnight (Brazos Press, 2014) The State in the New Testament | Oscar Cullman (Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1956) “Josephus on the Origin of the State” | Norman Horn (Libertarian Christian Institute, 2009) An Essay on Submission to the Powers That Be | James M. Willson (1850) Lex, Rex or The Law and the Prince | Samuel Rutherford (1644) Statism | R. C. Sproul (2008) Surprised by Hope; Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church | N.T Wright (HarperOne, 2018) Westminster Confession of Faith 20.4, Second Helvetic Confession chapter 30, Belgic Confession chapter 36, The 39 Articles number 37, and Augsburg Article 16. Article Series: Christian Theology of Public Policy | John Cobin, Libertarian Christian Institute, 2011) Faith Seeking Freedom For Further Reading 2 Chapter 2 The Libertarian Basics FURTHER READING Healing Our World: In an Age of Aggression | Mary Ruwart (Sunstar Press, 2003) Called to Freedom: Why You Can be Christian and Libertarian | Elise Daniel, Ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarian Perspectives on Policing and Punishment
    Forthcoming in the Routledge Companion to Libertarianism Libertarian perspectives on policing and punishment Jake Monaghan Libertarians are concerned primarily with the use or threat of force. Citizens are subjected to government force most directly through interactions with the criminal justice system. As usual, political reality diverges significantly from what libertarians think justice requires. This chapter offers an overview of libertarian perspectives on the administration of criminal justice. The essay proceeds in three stages, mirroring the criminal justice system. Section One asks, what is the legitimate scope of criminal law? This is followed in Section Two by its enforcement: how ought police enforce the criminal law? Given the seriously unjust nature of policing, ought policing to be merely reformed or abolished? Arrest is often followed by prosecution. Successful prosecution is followed by punishment, the topic of Section Three.1 Section Four concludes with some questions generated by failures of realized criminal justice systems. As a disclaimer, note that many of the arguments I will discuss are not distinctively libertarian or constitutive of the view, though they are closely associated with “hard” libertarian and classical liberal thought. 1. The scope of the criminal law Libertarianism, like any plausible normative political theory, takes power over another to be burdened by justification. This amounts to a presumptive constraint on the criminal law. There are a variety of foundations for this presumption (see the Foundations section of this volume). But how can any kind of police function be consistent with libertarian constraints on political power? The usual answer is that people will consent to the rules of a legal regime, or the law will be constrained to independently enforceable moral rules (Chartier 2013, 242).
    [Show full text]