Checklist of Inshore Demersal Fishes from Southern and Central California

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Checklist of Inshore Demersal Fishes from Southern and Central California 1 T /I•• .•' -:-~~:.;ir_:...~ ·.. ?·>,/ \:' --:1:.· ;)~{ --~ ;_. ··~ . AWt1 l'll This list was prepared to compare southern California trawl-caught fishes with those caught north of Point Conception. All data are based on otter trawl or beam trawl surveys; sources are listed at the end of the list, along with information on the effort, gear, and depths sampled in each survey. The list, which simply shows the presence or absence of species, reveals that at least 225 species1 of fish have been taken by otter trawl in coastal regions of southern and central California. Of these, 185 have been caught in southern California alone; 79 species have been found in both southern and central California waters. To provide a picture of the present coastal shelf bottom fish com­ munities, the data from 1969-72 southern California trawling sur­ veys (Southern California coastal Water Research Project 1973) were analyzed to identify recurrent groups (commonly associated species) of fishes. The analysis showed that about one-fifth of the 121 nearshore demersal species found in these surveys appeared in statistically significant associations. ~Five major groups and six associate species were defined in the analysis; the groups are shown in Figure 1. With the exception of the yellowchin sculpin (Icelinus guadriser­ iatus), queenfish (Seriphus politus), blackbelly eelpout (Lycodop­ sis pacifica), and blacktip poacher (Xeneretmus latifrons}, all southern California recurrent group species were also noted in the central California surveys described here. (The latter three species are known to occur at least as far north as northern Cali­ fornia; the fact that they were not noted in the central California surveys may be a result of low sampling effort in their depth ranges.} 1. Species marked "UI" (unidentified} on the list were included in the species counts only where they were the only members of the genus taken in the surveys. 1 ~ I PYGMY POACHER I I CURLFIN SOLE I INORTHERN ANNCHOVY Jo.so 10.26 Io.:33 GROUP 6 168 SAMPLES) GROUP 2 (49 SAMPLES) GROUP 3 (19! AMPLESI ~ SHALLOW YELLOWCHIN SCULPIN 0 SPECKLED SANODAB WHITE CRO AKER WATER LONGSPINE COMBFISH CALIF TONGUEFISH QUEENFISt- - HORNYHEAD TURBOT WHITE SEAi ERCH ENGLISH SOLE 0.50 I r--0.16 .J I ■ NOTE GROUP 1 140 SAMPLES) GROUPS IDENTIFIED 8\' RECURRENT GROUP ANALYSIS IAFFI NITY INDEX t\J PACIFIC SANDDAB 0.60 DOVER SOLE • 0.501. OTHER ASSOCIA TIONS IINDI­ MID-DEPTH CATED BY CONNECTINC LINESI PLAIN FIN MIDSHIPMAN DETERMINED BY CONNI X 4NALYSIS PINK SEAPERCH SHORTSPINE COMBFISH . 10.40 isTRIPETAIL ROCKFtsHl 0.60 I I I GROUP 4 164 SAMPLES) 0.60 DEEP 'I ~LACKBELLY EELPOUTI WATER SLENDER SOLE REX SOLE ' 0.50 : BLACKTIP POACHER I Figure l. Species Associations of Southern California Nearshore Dernersal Fishes, 1969-72. '~'i, . A. .A. , •r ... , .., , !lt'.:-!,li'l1 , W, 6fi'~-..I•,••.:,,•~ ,. , ., • .-,l •~,, ,,., •. ·• • W', ...,•Wl,0)1 ..., ,,,.:..~,.c.,;.;.,,;,, , .... '"· rr.<, ,~' . • t, '• { I ....,..,_..,{. ( • tf if•· ,r ,., I['" .•' . - · ·-·· , • " Central California Southern California Mont­ San ~ Morro erey Fran­ Species SCCWRP Carlisle Babel Dohrn UCSB Jow UCLA Bay Bay cisco Myxinidae .Eptatretus sp. (UI)[* X Eptatretus stouti X Petromyzontidae Lampetra ayresi X Hexanchidae Hexanchus griseus X l • Notorynchus, maculatua X Heterodontidae Heterodontus francisci X X Scylliorhinidae Apristurus brunneus X X X Cephaloscyllium ventrioaum X X X X Parmaturus xaniurus X X X X Carch arhinidae Galeorhinus zyopterus X X Mustelus californicus X X X Mustelus henlei X X X Prionace glauca X Triakis semifasciata X X X Squalidae Sgualus acanthias X X X X X X Squatinidae Sguatina californica X X X X X Rhinobatidae Platyrhinoidis triseriata X X X Rhinobatos productus X X X Torpedinidae Torpedo californica X X X X X X X X Rajidae Raja binoculata X X X Raja inornata X X X X X X Raja kincaidi X :x X X X X Raja rhina X X JL .IL Raja stellulata X X X Dasyatidae Dasyatis dipterura X Gymnura maxmorata X Urolophus halleri X X Myliobatidae Myliobatis californica X X X Hydrolaqus colliei X X X X X X X Acipenseridae Acipenser medirostris X Acipenser transmontanus X Nettastomatidae, Facciolella gilberti X congridae Gnathgphis catalinensis x -=- Clupeidae Alga sapidissima X X Clupea harengus pallasi X X norosoma, petenense X Qpisthonema medirastre X X sardinops ~ *UI = unidentified species. 3 ,J. •' Central t California - -- southern California Mont- San ~ Morro erey Fran- Species SCCWRP Carlisle Babel Dohrn UCSB Jow UCLA Bay Bay cisco - Engraulidae AQ!;}JQi:1, ~Qmli!.l::SHiH X Aochoa delicatissima X Engraulis mordax X X X X Salmonidae Ons;;orhynchus tsha~ticha X 5-sJ.mQ gairdneri X Osmeridae Allosmerus elongatui X Hyoomesus pretiosus X Spirinchus starksi X SEirinchus thaleichthys X Argentinidae ". Argentina sialis X X X Bathylagidae Bathylagus milleri X Storniatidae Stomias atriventer X Alepocephalidae Aleeocephalus tenebrosus X S~modontidae SYnodus lucioceps X X X X X Myctophidae Stenobrachius leucopsarus X '. cyprinidae CVPrinus carEiO ..·- X Ba tr achoididae Porichthys myriaster X X X X - Porichthys notatus X X X X X X X X X Gobiesocidae Gobiesox rhessodon X Moridae Physiculus rastrelliger X X Merlucciidae Merluccius eroductus X .x X X X X Gadu.dae .i. Micr29:adus proximus X Ophidiidae 1 Brosmophycis marginata· X Cataetyx rubrirostris X X Otoohidium scrieosae X X X Chilara taylori X X X X X X X . zoarcidae A:erodon cortezianus X X X X . ;-i"<'~ X . ~: Lycoda12us sp. (UI)* -.'"f Lycodoesis eacifica X X X . tJ:· Lyconema barbatum X X ..... ····•t Macrouridae Nezumia lioleeis X Nezumia stelgidole;eis X X Atherinidae Atherinops affinis X X X Atherinoesis californiensis .<': Gasterosteidae -l AulorhYnchus flavidus X Gas::erosteus aculeatus X e .•":j--~ *UI = unidentified species. 4 Central California ' Southern California Mont- San :tt ~ Morro erey Fran- !" Species SCCWRP Carlisle Babel Dohrn UCSB Jow UCLA Bay Bay cisco Syngnathidae Syngnathus sp. (UI) * X X s:i::ngnathus californiensis X X s:i::ngnathus leptorh:z::nchus X + X Percichthyidae Roccus saxatilis X Stereolepis .9-™ X Serranidae Paralabrax clathratus X X X X Paraiabrax macuiatorasciatus X • Paralabrax nebulifer X X X X X Branchiostegidae Caulolatilus erin£~E!! X Carangidae Trachurus svmmetr;j.cus X Sciaenidae cynoscion nobilis X ~en~QD!.ffl!Yli! lin~s1tu1 X X X X X X X MentJ,cirrbys ungulsg,i&i X X X Roni;.s1gg;i;: stearnsi X Seriebu12 politus X X X X X X Kyphosidae Megi.ii!l!.IDsl s::sl.i.forniensi:z X Einbiotocidae 8!:!lPll i §tic!JJ,U:! argenteys X X X X X cymatogiilster s1gg;i;:egs1ts1 X X X X X X X Einb;i.QtOCi;& jacksoni X X X X X X l(t X I EmbiQtocs1 lateril!,lis :,. Hyperprosopon anale X X X 'j li:;.!:l2!i:.C:'1.C:QliiQJ2QD s.r::genteYm X X X X li:ll2!i:l: J;!J: Q Iii QJ2QD ellipticum X Hypsurus caryi X X X Micrometrus minimus X X X Phanerodon atripes X Phanerodon furcatus X X X X X X X Rhacochilus toxotes X X X Rhacochilus vacca X X X X X X X Zalembius rosaceus X X X X X X X Pomacentridae Chromis punctipinnis X Labridae O~julis californica X Pimelometopon pulchrum X Bathymasteridae Rathbunella sp. (NSP) ** X Rathbunella hypoplecta X X X Uranoscopidae · Kathetostoma averruncus X X Clinidae Alloclinus holderi X cr:i::ptotrema corallinum .~ X Gibbonsia elegans X Gibbonsia metzi X Heterostichus rostratus X X X X Neoclinus blanchardi X X X X [) Neoclinus uninotatus X I *UI = unidentified species. **NSP = new species. 5 .l ~ :; . .:• . - ~- .. Central ~\:1_.- California Southern californi·a Mont- San Anton Morro erey Fran­ ·~ ~- Species SCCWRP Carlisle Babel Dohrn UCSB Jaw UCLA Bay Bay cisco Stichaeidae Plectobranchus evides X X Poroclinus rothrocki X P_holidae Apodichthys flavidus X Pholis ornata X Ulvicola sanctaerosae X Anarhlchadidae Anarrhichthys ocellatus X jAmlnodytidae Ammodytes hexapterus X Gobiidae Acanthogobius flavimanus X Coryphopterus nicholsi X X X X Lepidogobius lepidus X X X X X X Lythrypnus dalli X Lythrypnus zebra X Trichiuridae Lepidopus xantusi X Scombridae Sarda chiliensis X Stromateidae r w~ f ;n ~ Peprilus simillimus X X X X X X ;,'-;,/- t Scorpaenidae ' Scorpaena guttata X X X X X X Sebastes alutus X Sebastes auriculatus X X Sebastes aurora X X X Sebastes chlorostictus X X X X X X Sebastes constellatus X Sebastes crameri X X X X X Sebastes dalli X X X X Sebastes diploproa X X X X X X Sebastes elongatus X X X X X X Sebastes ensifer X Sebastes entomelas X X Sebastes ~ X X X X Sebastes flavidus X X X ...... Sebastes goodei X X X X X X Sebastes hopkinsi X Sebastes jordani X X X X X X Sebastes lentiginosus X Sebastes levis X X X X X X Sebastes rnacdonaldi X X Sebastes melanostomus X X X X X Sebastes miniatus X X X X X X X Sebastes mystinus X • X Sebas.tes ·ovalis X X Sebastes paucispinis X X X X X X Sebastes pinniger X Sebastes rastrelliger X Sebastes rosaceus X Sebastes rosenblatti X Sebastes rubrivinctus X X X X X Sebastes rufus X X Sebastes ~ola X X X X X X X Sebastes semicitctus X X X X X X 6 • -~ll"""""--:~ . -. I -~,';ii,;,~· ,,. --:f,...,_,.,., ..,,• ....., - . ; ;.,.;;:,:.:;;i;.;;;,r,, - - ~ r ' Central California Southern California ~- .(t Mont- San ~ Morro erey Fran- Species SCCWRP Carlisle Babel Dohrn UCSB Jow UCLA Bay Bay cisco Sebastes serranoides X X X Sebastes serriceps X X Sebast!ilS umbrosus X X X ,S~Qslli!:t~ia ~i:x.i l lat: i Iii X X X X X S~s1s:t~a Zsl~li:DttJ.15 X X s.ebastolobus alascanus X X X X X Sebastolobus altivelus X X Hexagrammidae Hexa2rammos stelleri X ' Ophiodon elon2atus X X X Oxylebius pictus· X X X X zaniole12is frenata X X X X X X X Zaniole12is lati]2innis X X X X X X Anoplopomatidae Anoplopoma fimbria X X X X ·x X Cottidae Artedius fenestralis X Art.edius harring:toni X Artedius lateralis X Artedius notosEilotus X X X Chitonotus pug:etensis X X X X X Hemilepidotus hemilepidotus X Icelinus cavifrons X Icelinus filamentosus X X X Icelinus fimbriatus X :)- Icelinus guadriseriatus X X X X X X 9 Kt Icelinus tenuis X X X Leptocottus armatus X X X X Radulinus asprellus X X Rhamphocottus richardsoni X X Scorpaenichthys marmoratus .
Recommended publications
  • Humboldt Bay Fishes
    Humboldt Bay Fishes ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> ·´¯`·._.·´¯`·.. ><((((º>`·._ .·´¯`·. _ .·´¯`·. ><((((º> Acknowledgements The Humboldt Bay Harbor District would like to offer our sincere thanks and appreciation to the authors and photographers who have allowed us to use their work in this report. Photography and Illustrations We would like to thank the photographers and illustrators who have so graciously donated the use of their images for this publication. Andrey Dolgor Dan Gotshall Polar Research Institute of Marine Sea Challengers, Inc. Fisheries And Oceanography [email protected] [email protected] Michael Lanboeuf Milton Love [email protected] Marine Science Institute [email protected] Stephen Metherell Jacques Moreau [email protected] [email protected] Bernd Ueberschaer Clinton Bauder [email protected] [email protected] Fish descriptions contained in this report are from: Froese, R. and Pauly, D. Editors. 2003 FishBase. Worldwide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org/ 13 August 2003 Photographer Fish Photographer Bauder, Clinton wolf-eel Gotshall, Daniel W scalyhead sculpin Bauder, Clinton blackeye goby Gotshall, Daniel W speckled sanddab Bauder, Clinton spotted cusk-eel Gotshall, Daniel W. bocaccio Bauder, Clinton tube-snout Gotshall, Daniel W. brown rockfish Gotshall, Daniel W. yellowtail rockfish Flescher, Don american shad Gotshall, Daniel W. dover sole Flescher, Don stripped bass Gotshall, Daniel W. pacific sanddab Gotshall, Daniel W. kelp greenling Garcia-Franco, Mauricio louvar
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Fishes of the Monterey Bay Area Including Elkhorn Slough, the San Lorenzo, Pajaro and Salinas Rivers
    f3/oC-4'( Contributions from the Moss Landing Marine Laboratories No. 26 Technical Publication 72-2 CASUC-MLML-TP-72-02 A CHECKLIST OF THE FISHES OF THE MONTEREY BAY AREA INCLUDING ELKHORN SLOUGH, THE SAN LORENZO, PAJARO AND SALINAS RIVERS by Gary E. Kukowski Sea Grant Research Assistant June 1972 LIBRARY Moss L8ndillg ,\:Jrine Laboratories r. O. Box 223 Moss Landing, Calif. 95039 This study was supported by National Sea Grant Program National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration United States Department of Commerce - Grant No. 2-35137 to Moss Landing Marine Laboratories of the California State University at Fresno, Hayward, Sacramento, San Francisco, and San Jose Dr. Robert E. Arnal, Coordinator , ·./ "':., - 'I." ~:. 1"-"'00 ~~ ~~ IAbm>~toriesi Technical Publication 72-2: A GI-lliGKL.TST OF THE FISHES OF TtlE MONTEREY my Jl.REA INCLUDING mmORH SLOUGH, THE SAN LCRENZO, PAY-ARO AND SALINAS RIVERS .. 1&let~: Page 14 - A1estria§.·~iligtro1ophua - Stone cockscomb - r-m Page 17 - J:,iparis'W10pus." Ribbon' snailt'ish - HE , ,~ ~Ei 31 - AlectrlQ~iu.e,ctro1OphUfi- 87-B9 . .', . ': ". .' Page 31 - Ceb1diehtlrrs rlolaCewi - 89 , Page 35 - Liparis t!01:f-.e - 89 .Qhange: Page 11 - FmWulns parvipin¢.rl, add: Probable misidentification Page 20 - .BathopWuBt.lemin&, change to: .Mhgghilu§. llemipg+ Page 54 - Ji\mdJ11ui~~ add: Probable. misidentifioation Page 60 - Item. number 67, authOr should be .Hubbs, Clark TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 AREA OF COVERAGE 1 METHODS OF LITERATURE SEARCH 2 EXPLANATION OF CHECKLIST 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4 TABLE 1
    [Show full text]
  • Intrinsic Vulnerability in the Global Fish Catch
    The following appendix accompanies the article Intrinsic vulnerability in the global fish catch William W. L. Cheung1,*, Reg Watson1, Telmo Morato1,2, Tony J. Pitcher1, Daniel Pauly1 1Fisheries Centre, The University of British Columbia, Aquatic Ecosystems Research Laboratory (AERL), 2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada 2Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Açores, 9901-862 Horta, Portugal *Email: [email protected] Marine Ecology Progress Series 333:1–12 (2007) Appendix 1. Intrinsic vulnerability index of fish taxa represented in the global catch, based on the Sea Around Us database (www.seaaroundus.org) Taxonomic Intrinsic level Taxon Common name vulnerability Family Pristidae Sawfishes 88 Squatinidae Angel sharks 80 Anarhichadidae Wolffishes 78 Carcharhinidae Requiem sharks 77 Sphyrnidae Hammerhead, bonnethead, scoophead shark 77 Macrouridae Grenadiers or rattails 75 Rajidae Skates 72 Alepocephalidae Slickheads 71 Lophiidae Goosefishes 70 Torpedinidae Electric rays 68 Belonidae Needlefishes 67 Emmelichthyidae Rovers 66 Nototheniidae Cod icefishes 65 Ophidiidae Cusk-eels 65 Trachichthyidae Slimeheads 64 Channichthyidae Crocodile icefishes 63 Myliobatidae Eagle and manta rays 63 Squalidae Dogfish sharks 62 Congridae Conger and garden eels 60 Serranidae Sea basses: groupers and fairy basslets 60 Exocoetidae Flyingfishes 59 Malacanthidae Tilefishes 58 Scorpaenidae Scorpionfishes or rockfishes 58 Polynemidae Threadfins 56 Triakidae Houndsharks 56 Istiophoridae Billfishes 55 Petromyzontidae
    [Show full text]
  • Flounders, Halibuts, Soles Capture Production by Species, Fishing Areas
    101 Flounders, halibuts, soles Capture production by species, fishing areas and countries or areas B-31 Flets, flétans, soles Captures par espèces, zones de pêche et pays ou zones Platijas, halibuts, lenguados Capturas por especies, áreas de pesca y países o áreas Species, Fishing area Espèce, Zone de pêche 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Especie, Área de pesca t t t t t t t t t t Mediterranean scaldfish Arnoglosse de Méditerranée Serrandell Arnoglossus laterna 1,83(01)001,01 MSF 34 Italy - - - - - - - 57 223 123 34 Fishing area total - - - - - - - 57 223 123 37 Italy ... ... ... ... ... ... 447 479 169 403 37 Fishing area total ... ... ... ... ... ... 447 479 169 403 Species total ... ... ... ... ... ... 447 536 392 526 Leopard flounder Rombou léopard Lenguado leopardo Bothus pantherinus 1,83(01)018,05 OUN 51 Bahrain 2 - - 1 1 4 4 F 4 F 4 F 4 F Saudi Arabia 77 80 77 75 74 83 71 79 80 F 74 51 Fishing area total 79 80 77 76 75 87 75 F 83 F 84 F 78 F Species total 79 80 77 76 75 87 75 F 83 F 84 F 78 F Lefteye flounders nei Arnoglosses, rombous nca Rodaballos, rombos, etc. nep Bothidae 1,83(01)XXX,XX LEF 21 USA 1 087 774 566 747 992 759 545 406 633 409 21 Fishing area total 1 087 774 566 747 992 759 545 406 633 409 27 Germany - - - - - - - - 0 - Portugal 136 103 143 125 105 102 87 76 84 105 Spain 134 116 96 56 29 8 12 12 6 5 27 Fishing area total 270 219 239 181 134 110 99 88 90 110 31 USA 59 38 71 45 41 128 117 133 99 102 31 Fishing area total 59 38 71 45 41 128 117 133 99 102 34 Greece - - - - - - - 71 45 - Portugal 15 46 ..
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes-Of-The-Salish-Sea-Pp18.Pdf
    NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 18 Fishes of the Salish Sea: a compilation and distributional analysis Theodore W. Pietsch James W. Orr September 2015 U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA Professional Penny Pritzker Secretary of Commerce Papers NMFS National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Kathryn D. Sullivan Scientifi c Editor Administrator Richard Langton National Marine Fisheries Service National Marine Northeast Fisheries Science Center Fisheries Service Maine Field Station Eileen Sobeck 17 Godfrey Drive, Suite 1 Assistant Administrator Orono, Maine 04473 for Fisheries Associate Editor Kathryn Dennis National Marine Fisheries Service Offi ce of Science and Technology Fisheries Research and Monitoring Division 1845 Wasp Blvd., Bldg. 178 Honolulu, Hawaii 96818 Managing Editor Shelley Arenas National Marine Fisheries Service Scientifi c Publications Offi ce 7600 Sand Point Way NE Seattle, Washington 98115 Editorial Committee Ann C. Matarese National Marine Fisheries Service James W. Orr National Marine Fisheries Service - The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS (ISSN 1931-4590) series is published by the Scientifi c Publications Offi ce, National Marine Fisheries Service, The NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series carries peer-reviewed, lengthy original NOAA, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, research reports, taxonomic keys, species synopses, fl ora and fauna studies, and data- Seattle, WA 98115. intensive reports on investigations in fi shery science, engineering, and economics. The Secretary of Commerce has Copies of the NOAA Professional Paper NMFS series are available free in limited determined that the publication of numbers to government agencies, both federal and state. They are also available in this series is necessary in the transac- exchange for other scientifi c and technical publications in the marine sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Beam-Trawl Survey O F Bay a N D Nearshore Fishes O F
    ALLEN AND HERBINSON: BEAM-TRAWL FISH SURVEY, 1989 CalCOFl Rep., Vol. 32,1991 BEAM-TRAWL SURVEY OF BAY AND NEARSHORE FISHES OF THE SOFT-BOTTOM HABITAT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IN 1989 M. JAMES ALLEN KEVIN T. HERBINSON MBC Applied Environmental Sciences Southern California Edison Company 947 Newhall Street P. 0. Box 800 Costa Mesa. California 92627 Rosemead, California 91770 ABSTRACT profundidad del sur de California muestradas por las Small-meshed (2.5-mm) beam trawls have been redes de arrastre de fondo de malla fina. Siendo asi, used in several recent surveys to examine the distri- se estudiaron algunas Areas costeras de 10s condados bution of newly settled California halibut (Puvul- de Los Angeles, Orange, y San Diego, entre abril y ichthyr cul$ofortzicus). However, information on the septiembre de 1989. Se tomaron muestras en cuatro entire fish assemblage collected in these surveys has localidades costeras (Hermosa Beach, Long Beach, not previously been reported. The objective of this San Onofre, y Carlsbad) y en dos lagunas costeras study was to describe the bay and shallow coastal (Anaheim Bay y Agua Hedionda Lagoon). Se mues- ichthyofauna of southern California as sampled by trearon tres estaciones en cada localidad utilizando small-meshed beam trawls. Areas off Los Angeles, una red de arrastre de fondo de 1.0 m en las lagunas Orange, and San Diego counties were surveyed y una red de 1.6 m en las ireas costeras. Se colectaron from April to September 1989. Three stations were 288 muestras en total, a profundidades de 0-3 m en sampled at each of four coastal sites (Hermosa las lagunas y de 6-13 m a lo largo de la costa.
    [Show full text]
  • F Latfishes Families Bothidae, Cvnoalossidae, and F'leuronectidae
    NORTHEAST PAC IF IC F latfishes Families Bothidae, Cvnoalossidae, and F'leuronectidae Ponald E, Kramer a i@i!liam H. Bares Brian C. F'aust + Barry E. Bracken illustrated by Terry Josey Alaska 5ea Grant Col/egeProgram Universityor Alaska Fa>rbanks P.O.Pox 755040 Fairbanks,Aiaska 99775-5040 907! 474-6707 ~ Fax 907! 47a 5285 Alaska Rshenes0eveioprnent Foundation 508 West seoono'Avenue, suite 212 Anonorage.Alaska 99501-2208 Marine Advisory Bulletin No. 47 a 1995 a $20.00 ElmerE. RasmusonLibrary Cataloging-in-Publication Data Guide to northeast Pacific flatfishes: families Bothidae, Cynoglossidae, and Pleuronectidae/by Donald E. Kramer ... Iet al,l Marine advisory bulletin; no. 47! 1. Flatfishes Identification. 2. Flattishes North Pacific Ocean. 3. Bothidae. 4. Cynoglossidae.5, Pleuronectidae. I. Kramer,Donald E. II. AlaskaSea Grant College Program. III. AlaskaFisheries Development Foundation. IV, Series. QL637.9.PSG85 1995 ISBN 1-5 !t2-032-2 Credits Thisbook is the resultof work sponsoredby the Universityof AlaskaSea GrantCollege Program, which is cooperativelysupported by the U.S,Depart- mentof Commerce,NOAA Office of SeaGrant and ExtramuralPrograms, undergrant no. NA4f! RG0104, projects A/7 I -01and A/75-01, and by the Universityof Alaskawith statefunds. The Universityof Alaskais an affirma- tive action/equal opportunity employer and educational institution. SeaGrant is a unique partnership with public and private sectors com- bining research,education, and technologytransfer for public service,This national network of universities meets
    [Show full text]
  • 61661147.Pdf
    Resource Inventory of Marine and Estuarine Fishes of the West Coast and Alaska: A Checklist of North Pacific and Arctic Ocean Species from Baja California to the Alaska–Yukon Border OCS Study MMS 2005-030 and USGS/NBII 2005-001 Project Cooperation This research addressed an information need identified Milton S. Love by the USGS Western Fisheries Research Center and the Marine Science Institute University of California, Santa Barbara to the Department University of California of the Interior’s Minerals Management Service, Pacific Santa Barbara, CA 93106 OCS Region, Camarillo, California. The resource inventory [email protected] information was further supported by the USGS’s National www.id.ucsb.edu/lovelab Biological Information Infrastructure as part of its ongoing aquatic GAP project in Puget Sound, Washington. Catherine W. Mecklenburg T. Anthony Mecklenburg Report Availability Pt. Stephens Research Available for viewing and in PDF at: P. O. Box 210307 http://wfrc.usgs.gov Auke Bay, AK 99821 http://far.nbii.gov [email protected] http://www.id.ucsb.edu/lovelab Lyman K. Thorsteinson Printed copies available from: Western Fisheries Research Center Milton Love U. S. Geological Survey Marine Science Institute 6505 NE 65th St. University of California, Santa Barbara Seattle, WA 98115 Santa Barbara, CA 93106 [email protected] (805) 893-2935 June 2005 Lyman Thorsteinson Western Fisheries Research Center Much of the research was performed under a coopera- U. S. Geological Survey tive agreement between the USGS’s Western Fisheries
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural Resources of Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary
    Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series ONMS-13-05 The Natural Resources of Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary: A Focus on Federal Waters Final Report June 2013 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Office of National Marine Sanctuaries June 2013 About the Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Ocean Service (NOS) administers the Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS). Its mission is to identify, designate, protect and manage the ecological, recreational, research, educational, historical, and aesthetic resources and qualities of nationally significant coastal and marine areas. The existing marine sanctuaries differ widely in their natural and historical resources and include nearshore and open ocean areas ranging in size from less than one to over 5,000 square miles. Protected habitats include rocky coasts, kelp forests, coral reefs, sea grass beds, estuarine habitats, hard and soft bottom habitats, segments of whale migration routes, and shipwrecks. Because of considerable differences in settings, resources, and threats, each marine sanctuary has a tailored management plan. Conservation, education, research, monitoring and enforcement programs vary accordingly. The integration of these programs is fundamental to marine protected area management. The Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series reflects and supports this integration by providing a forum for publication and discussion of the complex issues currently facing the sanctuary system. Topics of published reports vary substantially and may include descriptions of educational programs, discussions on resource management issues, and results of scientific research and monitoring projects. The series facilitates integration of natural sciences, socioeconomic and cultural sciences, education, and policy development to accomplish the diverse needs of NOAA’s resource protection mandate.
    [Show full text]
  • Anomalous Epipelagic Micronekton Assemblage
    SAKUMA ET AL.: ANOMALOUS EPIPELAGIC MICRONEKTON ASSEMBLAGE PATTERNS IN THE NERITIC WATERS OF THE CALIFORNIA CURRENT IN SPRING 2015 DURING A PERIOD OF EXTREME OCEAN CONDITIONS CalCOFI Rep., Vol. 57, 2016 ANOMALOUS EPIPELAGIC MICRONEKTON ASSEMBLAGE PATTERNS IN THE NERITIC WATERS OF THE CALIFORNIA CURRENT IN SPRING 2015 DURING A PERIOD OF EXTREME OCEAN CONDITIONS KEITH M. SAKUMA, JOHN C. FIELD, BALDO B. MARINOVIC, CYNTHIA N. CARRION NATHAN J. MANTUA, STEPHEN RALSTON Institute for Marine Sciences Fisheries Ecology Division University of California Santa Cruz Southwest Fisheries Science Center Santa Cruz, CA 95060 National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 110 McAllister Way Santa Cruz, California 95060 ph: (831) 420-3945 [email protected] ABSTRACT these results indicate that the micronekton community We report on the anomalous distribution, abun- structure in the late spring of 2015 was highly anoma- dance, and community structure patterns of epipelagic lous in that species characteristic of what might gener- micronekton from a midwater trawl survey in May–June ally be considered three different nominal states (YOY 2015 that has a 26-year time series within a core region groundfish/market squid and krill, warm-water subtropi- off central California (36˚35'–38˚10'N) and a 12-year cal species, and pelagic tunicates) were all encountered time series with expanded spatial coverage (extending in high abundance. from 32˚42.5'–39˚50'N). The 2015 survey took place during an extended period of record-breaking warm INTRODUCTION surface temperatures in much of the northeast Pacific Oceanographic conditions within the California Cur- Ocean. In the neritic waters off central and northern rent were highly variable from 2013–15.
    [Show full text]
  • Trawl Communities and Organism Health
    chapter 6 TRAWL COMMUNITIES AND ORGANISM HEALTH Chapter 6 TRAWL COMMUNITIES AND ORGANISM HEALTH INTRODUCTION The Orange County Sanitation District (District) Ocean Monitoring Program (OMP) samples the demersal (bottom-dwelling) fish and epibenthic macroinvertebrate (large invertebrates that live on the bottom) organisms to assess effects of the wastewater discharge on these communities and the health of the individual fish within the monitoring area (Figure 6-1). The District’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requires evaluation of these organisms to demonstrate that the biological community within the influence of the discharge is not degraded and that the outfall is not an epicenter of diseased fish (see box below). The monitoring area includes populations of commercially and recreationally important species, such as California halibut (Paralichthys californicus), California scorpionfish (Scorpaena guttata), and ridgeback rockshrimp (Sicyonia ingentis). Past monitoring findings have shown that the wastewater outfall has two primary impacts to the biota of the receiving waters: reef and discharge effects (OCSD 2001, 2004). Reef effects are changes related to the habitat modification by the physical presence of the outfall structure and associated rock ballast. This structure provides a three dimensional hard substrate habitat that harbors a different suite of species than that found on the surrounding soft bottom. As a result, the area near the outfall pipe can have greater species diversity. Compliance criteria pertaining to trawl communities and organism health contained in the District’s NPDES Ocean Discharge Permit (Order No. R8-2004-0062, Permit No. CAO110604). Criteria Description C.5.a Marine Communities Marine communities, including vertebrates, invertebrates, and algae shall not be degraded.
    [Show full text]
  • Change in Oregon's Nearshore Groundfish Trawl Fishery
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Rebecca A. Howard for the degree of Master of Science in Marine Resource Management presented on September 9, 2020. Title: Change in Oregon’s Nearshore Groundfish Trawl Fishery: Perspectives from Science and Industry Data. Abstract approved: _____________________________________________________________ Lorenzo Ciannelli The commercial groundfish fishing industry and groundfish research have a long concurrent history of activity on the Oregon continental margin. Within the non-whiting groundfish fishery, the target species are primarily flatfishes, sablefish, lingcod, and rockfishes, though landings of each have fluctuated over time. Recent work shows that over the past two decades, fishing effort has shifted offshore likely due to implementation of gear regulations, area closures, and lower catch limits. Although federal fishery-independent surveys have been conducted across most of the groundfish fishery’s depth range, data is limited by years and seasons surveyed as well as absence of data in the shallowest waters (< 55 m). Fishery-dependent data covers those shallow waters and a broader temporal range, but at a coarse scale. Limitations in data coverage combined with a historical focus on deep-water groundfishes has led to a gap in understanding of dynamics within the nearshore fishery, particularly regarding the influence of environmental factors on abundance and distribution. Through this thesis, I analyzed changes in spatiotemporal dynamics of the Oregon nearshore non-whiting groundfish trawl fishery and assessed gaps in each data source over the past four decades. Statistical modeling was used to elucidate distribution shifts in species as well as temporal changes in community composition. These analyses revealed how individual species’ distributions have geographically shifted over time, what environmental variables affect their spatial distribution, and how depth and habitat type strongly influence nearshore community composition.
    [Show full text]