DOCSLIB.ORG

TGM 2019 Grant Application Transportation and Growth Management Program Grant Application for the Year 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TGM 2019 Grant Application Transportation and Growth Management Program Grant Application for the Year 2019 TGM 2019 Grant Application Transportation and Growth Management Program grant application for the year 2019. Be sure to download and review the 2019 application packet before filling out this grant application. Additional resources and examples of successful applications can be found on the TGM planning grants page. You can save your progress by clicking the "Save" button at the bottom of the form. Type of grant ODOT region (1-5): Category 1: Transportation System Planning 1 Primary applicant jurisdiction: Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Project title: TriMet Accessible Bus Stops Plan Mailing address: 1800 SW 1st Avenue, Suite 300, Portland, Oregon 97201 Contact person name: Contact person title: Kerry Ayres-Palanuk Director, Planning and Policy Contact phone: Contact email: (503) 962-7520 [email protected] List other local jurisdictions providing match: Summary description of project: The TriMet Accessible Bus Stops Plan will provide systems-level guidance for capital investments in infrastructure at or near bus stops to improve overall access to fixed-route bus service for people with disabilities. The foundation of the plan will be established through an energetic public engagement process. The existing TriMet bus stop inventory will be updated to include additional accessibility attributes, and stops and route segments will be classified to define network level thresholds for improvements. The plan will help guide TriMet investments in bus stop infrastructure and TriMet responses to jurisdictional requests for direction on transit infrastructure requirements for service expansions and increases, project design and transportation system plan updates. Project cost table TGM funds requested Consultant: $ Consultant 200,000 Local reimbursement: $ Local Reimbursement 0 Total TGM funds requested $ Total TGM Funds Requested 200,000 Local match 12% minimum (calculated) $ 12% Minimum 27,273 Match to be provided Labor, supplies and services during project: $ Labor, supplies and services during project 27,723 Payment when Intergovernmental Agreement is $ Check at time of IGA signing signed: 0 Certifications This application was prepared by staff of the primary applicant or staff of one of the involved jurisdictions. Consultant name (if applicable): Untitled By checking this box, I certify that my organization listed above supports the proposed project, has the legal authority to pledge matching funds, and has the legal authority to apply for Transportation and Growth Management funds. I further certify that matching funds are available or will be available for the proposed project. I understand that all State of Oregon rules for contracting, auditing, underwriting (where applicable), and payment will apply to this project. Date 6/5/2019 Eligibility requirements The following three eligibility requirements are reviewed on a pass/fail basis. Applications found to not meet each of these requirements will not be scored against the award criteria and will not be awarded a grant. 1. Clear transportation relationship A proposed project must have a clear transportation relationship and produce transportation benefits. A project must entail analysis, evaluation and selection of alternatives, development of implementation actions, and public involvement that results in a long range transportation plan, land use plan, or other product that addresses a transportation problem, need, opportunity, or issue of local or regional importance. 1. Clear Transportation Relationship This project has a clear transportation relationship because it creates a system plan for critical connection points of multiple modes of transportation. Bus stops are shared spaces in the transportation system where individuals transition from being pedestrians and cyclists to being transit users. Barriers to movement and transitions within the space that bus stops provide need to be identified, addressed or eliminated to ensure that all individuals have the ability to safely move from one mode to the next with ease. 2. Adoption of products to meet project objectives A proposed project must include preparation of an adoption-ready product or products that lead to a local policy decision and that directly address the project objectives, such as a transportation system plan, comprehensive plan amendment, land use plan, code amendment, implementation program, or intergovernmental agreement. Projects are expected to include adoption hearings (or equivalent) by the governing body or to prepare products which will be adopted as part of a larger project. 2. Adoption of Products to Meet Project Objectives The TriMet Accessible Bus Stops Plan will presented to the TriMet Board of Directors for adoption upon completion. Upon adoption, the plan will guide TriMet investments in bus stop infrastructure. TriMet staff will also use the Accessible Bus Stops plan as a reference to advise jurisdictions as they request technical assistance to complete local land use reviews and update their local plans in order to comply with 3.08.120 and 3.08.130 of the Regional Transportation Functional Plan, which obligates them to include a transit plan and pedestrian plan in their Transportation System Plans. 3. Support of local officials A proposed project must clearly demonstrate that local officials, both the primary applicant and any co- applicants, understand the purpose of the grant application and support the project objectives. A resolution of support, meeting minutes, or authorized letter from the governing body of all applicants (e.g. City Council, Board of Commissioners, or Transit Board) must be submitted with the application to meet this requirement. Upload your resolution, minutes or authorized letter from governing body of applying jurisdiction(s) here: Resolution 19-05-39 Authorizing the creation of a TriMet Accessible Bus Stops Plan.pdf Award criteria Applications will be scored on the following criteria. Instructions for responding to these criteria can be found in the application packet. TGM may award up to 10 bonus points for innovation. 1. Proposed project addresses a need and supports TGM objectives (up to 40 points) The project clearly and effectively addresses a local or regional transportation or transportation-related land use issue, problem, need, or opportunity and will achieve one or more of the TGM objectives. 1. Proposed project addresses a need and supports TGM objectives (up to 40 points) The TriMet district serves a population of over 1.5 million across 533 square miles of Clackamas, Multnomah and Washington Counties. There are over 6,600 bus stops serving 85 bus routes in the TriMet System that travel within urban, suburban and exurban geographies. The purpose of the Accessible Bus Stops Plan is to provide systems level guidance for prioritizing and siting improvements to infrastructure at or near bus stops, with a focus on moving toward universal access for people with disabilities. This plan will provide needed data and direction to inform an update to TriMet’s Bus Stop Guidelines, which were last revised in July, 2010 and will provide additional structure for implementing right of way improvements for full system accessibility and service expansion. Bus stops provide crucial modal connections that allow people to transition from pedestrian infrastructure to the fixed-route transit system. When barriers are present at or near bus stops, people’s overall mobility is significantly reduced. The displacement of residents to areas of the region, including emerging centers and corridors, where bus stops are less developed has affected the mobility of thousands of transit-reliant individuals. Planning analysis of this displacement will help define the geographies, route segments and bus stops with the greatest need for stop improvements and the appropriate types of improvements to invest in where high needs are identified. The overall goal is to ensure that an individual’s mobility does not end at a bus stop and that they are able to safely transition from the pedestrian environment to fixed route, which provides more choices to individuals traveling within the region. The scope, scale and geographic context of bus stop accessibility will be informed by public engagement, a project advisory committee a technical advisory committee, and input from stakeholders and experts in accessibility and universal design. This definition may extend beyond the immediate area of the bus stop and will be context-sensitive to surrounding land uses. The desired attributes of an accessible bus stop may extend beyond ADA minimum requirements, and prioritization of improvements that exceed ADA minimums will be based on PAC and TAC advisory recommendations and the recommendations of the TriMet Bus Stops Group planning staff. This effort provides new accessibility measures and criteria that translate into attributes to add to TriMet’s bus stop inventory and geo-database records. Adoptable plan components will include definitions of minimum distances, clearances and basic stop configurations as well as strategies for non-conforming situations. Strategies for mitigating the effects of parking demand, increased development and right-of-way improvements implemented by other jurisdictions will also be identified with a goal of advising and assisting other jurisdictions in leveraging changes to the built environment for the greatest bus stop accessibility benefit. Other aspects of bus stop accessibility related to safety and access will be evaluated during
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
    Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks
    [Show full text]
  • NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon
    Portland State University PDXScholar Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Publications and Presentations Planning 6-24-2014 Do TODs Make a Difference? NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon Jenny H. Liu Portland State University, [email protected] Zakari Mumuni Portland State University Matt Berggren Portland State University Matt Miller University of Utah Arthur C. Nelson University of Utah SeeFollow next this page and for additional additional works authors at: https:/ /pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac Part of the Transportation Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Liu, Jenny H.; Mumuni, Zakari; Berggren, Matt; Miller, Matt; Nelson, Arthur C.; and Ewing, Reid, "Do TODs Make a Difference? NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon" (2014). Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations. 124. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/124 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Studies and Planning Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors Jenny H. Liu, Zakari Mumuni, Matt Berggren, Matt Miller, Arthur C. Nelson, and Reid Ewing This report is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/usp_fac/124 NS Streetcar Line Portland, Oregon Do TODs Make a Difference? Jenny H. Liu, Zakari Mumuni, Matt Berggren, Matt Miller, Arthur C. Nelson & Reid Ewing Portland State University 6/24/2014 ______________________________________________________________________________ DO TODs MAKE A DIFFERENCE? 1 of 35 Section 1-INTRODUCTION 2 of 35 ______________________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents 1-INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of Trimet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY
    MAKING HISTORY 50 Years of TriMet and Transit in the Portland Region MAKING HISTORY 50 YEARS OF TRIMET AND TRANSIT IN THE PORTLAND REGION CONTENTS Foreword: 50 Years of Transit Creating Livable Communities . 1 Setting the Stage for Doing Things Differently . 2 Portland, Oregon’s Legacy of Transit . 4 Beginnings ............................................................................4 Twentieth Century .....................................................................6 Transit’s Decline. 8 Bucking National Trends in the Dynamic 1970s . 11 New Institutions for a New Vision .......................................................12 TriMet Is Born .........................................................................14 Shifting Gears .........................................................................17 The Freeway Revolt ....................................................................18 Sidebar: The TriMet and City of Portland Partnership .......................................19 TriMet Turbulence .....................................................................22 Setting a Course . 24 Capital Program ......................................................................25 Sidebar: TriMet Early Years and the Mount Hood Freeway ...................................29 The Banfield Project ...................................................................30 Sidebar: The Transportation Managers Advisory Committee ................................34 Sidebar: Return to Sender ..............................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Service Planning Decisions on Rail Transit Success June 2009 Or Failure 6
    MTI The InfluenceThe of ServiceTransitPlanning Failure DecisionsSuccess or on Rail Funded by U.S. Department of Transportation and California The Influence of Service Planning Department of Transportation Decisions on Rail Transit Success or Failure MTI ReportMTI 08-04 MTI Report 08-04 June 2009 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Norman Y. Mineta International Institute for Surface Transportation Policy Studies (MTI) was established by Congress as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Reauthorized in 1998, MTI was selected by the U.S. Department of Transportation through a competitive process in 2002 as a national “Center of Excellence.” The Institute is funded by Con- MTI BOARD OF TRUSTEES gress through the United States Department of Transportation’s Research and Innovative Technology Administration, the Califor- nia Legislature through the Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and by private grants and donations. Honorary Co-Chair Rebecca Brewster Steve Heminger Stephanie Pinson Hon. James Oberstar ** President/COO Executive Director President/COO American Transportation Metropolitan Transportation Gilbert Tweed Associates, Inc. The Institute receives oversight from an internationally respected Board of Trustees whose members represent all major surface Chair House Transportation and Research Institute Commission New York, NY transportation modes. MTI’s focus on policy and management resulted from a Board assessment of the industry’s unmet needs Smyrna, GA Oakland, CA Infrastructure Committee Hans Rat and led directly to the choice of the San José State University College of Business as the Institute’s home. The Board provides House of Representatives Donald H. Camph Hon. John Horsley # Secretary General policy direction, assists with needs assessment, and connects the Institute and its programs with the international transportation Washington, DC President Executive Director Union Internationale des California Institute for community.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Funding Task Force: Trimet Update
    Transportation Funding Task Force: TriMet Update September 25th, 2019 Meeting Outline Welcome and Introduction Dr. Linda Simmons, TriMet Board Member and T2020 Task Force Member 1. Transit Equity and Inclusion, Low Income Fare Initiatives John Gardner - Director, Transit Equity, Inclusion and Community Affairs 2. Transit Service Update and Future Service Outlook Kerry Ayres-Palanuk – Director, Planning & Policy 3. Enhanced Transit and Better Bus Program Jamie Snook – Manager, Capital Planning 4. Regionally Significant Transit Priorities Dave Unsworth – Director, Project Development & Permitting Discussion with Task Force Members Bernie Bottomly - Executive Director, Public Affairs 2 1. Transit Equity and Inclusion, Low Income Fare Initiatives John Gardner Director of Transit Equity, Inclusion and Community Affairs TriMet’s Diversity at a glance TriMet’s Board • Majority women and men of color TriMet’s Executive Leadership • Majority women and men of color TriMet’s Staff reflects the Diversity of the Region TriMet’s Ridership • 37% of all trips on TriMet are taken by people of color • 40% of the trips taken by people of color are taken on MAX 4 Community Engagement • TEAC TriMet’s Transit Equity Advisory Committee is made up of the following organizations • Safety & Security • Youth Committee • Language Access Advisory Committee • Committee on Accessible Transportation • Riders Club ~59,500 • Launching newsletter for 170 community based organizations and system partners 5 Fare affordability & system access • Access Transit provides $1.3
    [Show full text]
  • West Broadway Transit Study Economic Development Impacts of Transit Alternatives
    West Broadway Transit Study Economic Development Impacts of Transit Alternatives 11/11/2015 Prepared by the SRF Consulting Group Team for Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 3 II. Baseline Development Scenario ............................................................................................................... 3 III. Literature Review & Case Study Findings ............................................................................................... 9 IV. Developer Interview Findings ................................................................................................................ 17 V. BRT and Streetcar Development Scenarios........................................................................................... 19 Appendix: Transit Economic Development Impacts Case Studies ............................................................. 24 West Broadway Transit Study 2 I. Introduction Metro Transit, in collaboration with Hennepin County and the Cities of Minneapolis, Robbinsdale, and Golden Valley, is seeking guidance on the economic development impacts of proposed streetcar and bus rapid transit (BRT) alternatives along the West Broadway corridor. As documented in the April 1, 2015 methodology statement, transit can support economic development by enhancing mobility and providing a placemaking amenity for the corridor. The Team developed a financial model in order to
    [Show full text]
  • Streetcar System Concept Plan a Framework for Future Corridor Planning and Alternatives Analysis
    PORTLAND STREETCAR SYSTEM CONCEPT PLAN A Framework for Future Corridor Planning and Alternatives Analysis Adopted September 9, 2009 by Portland City Council This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration How this document will be used This document will be used to identify and select corridors for future Alternatives Analysis and planning studies as funding becomes available. No funding plan or schedule has been identified for any of the potential streetcar projects. Transit corridors citywide were assessed to determine which corridors have the best potential for future streetcar investment. Corridors that are shown in this document represent the best opportunities for streetcar infrastructure. Detailed corridor by corridor analysis, study and discussions with corridor neighborhoods are necessary to determine if a streetcar investment is warranted. No individual corridor can move forward without a detailed analysis and planning study to address the purpose and need of a streetcar project and to comprehensively evaluate project impacts. The Portland Bureau of Transportation fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the ADA Title II, and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. For accommodations and additional information, contact the Title II and Title VI Coordinator at Room 1204, 1120 SW 5th Ave, Portland, OR 97204, or by telephone 503-823-2559, City TTY 503-823-6868, or use Oregon Relay Service: 711. PORTLAND STREETCAR SYSTEM CONCEPT PLAN A Framework for Future Corridor Planning and Alternatives Analysis Adopted by Portland City Council September 9, 2009 Resolution 36732 Acknowledgements City of Portland Bureau of Transportation Sam Adams, Mayor, Commissioner of Public Utilities Susan D.
    [Show full text]
  • C-TRAN Board of Directors February 12, 2013 Minutes Page 1 of 15 C
    C-TRAN BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING MINUTES February 12, 2013 The C-TRAN Board of Directors meeting was held Tuesday, February 12, 2013 at C-TRAN Administrative Facility, 2425 NE 65th Avenue, Vancouver, Washington 98661. CALL TO ORDER Chair Bill Ganley called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chair Smith led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS PRESENT: Connie Jo Freeman, Bill Ganley, Bart Hansen, Roy Jennings, Tim Leavitt, David Madore, Tom Mielke, Jim Irish, Larry Smith, ABSENT: Steve Stuart None STAFF PRESENT Executive Director/CEO Jeff Hamm, Legal Counsel Tom Wolfendale, Director of Operations Lynn Halsey, Director of Development & Public Affairs Scott Patterson, Director of Maintenance John Hoefs, Director of Administrative Services Diane O’Regan, Operations Chief Debra Wright, Senior Manager of Development & Public Affairs Jim Quintana, Senior Human Resources Manager Julie DeBoever, Senior Manager of Information Technology Bob McMahan, Passenger Service Manager Walt Gordon, Senior Planner Tom Shook, Executive Assistant/Clerk of the Board Debbie Jermann CHANGES TO AND APPROVAL OF THE BOARD AGENDA LARRY SMITH MOTIONED, TIM LEAVITT SECONDED, AND MOTION CARRIED TO APPROVE THE AGENDA. CITIZEN COMMUNICATION TO THE BOARD STEVE HERMAN, Vancouver, WA thanked the Board for their support of the November 2012 vote, and asked for consideration of a straight yes or no vote on the proposed light rail project. C-TRAN Board of Directors February 12, 2013 Minutes Page 1 of 15 CAROLYN CRAIN, Vancouver, WA stated there is proposed legislation in Olympia that has light rail implications and violate eminent domain, and could result in public property disposition for less than market value.
    [Show full text]
  • Extending Light Rail to the North
    PHILADELPHIA THOMPSON SR-501 SUNSET -SYL V ERWIN O REIGER MEMORIAL AN SCHOLLS FERR SR-501 Y SUNSET PA TT SKYLINE ON WILLAMETTE SHA TTUCK T S HELENS YEON LOWER RIVER LOWER HUMPHREY POR TLAND 41ST W DOSCH SE ARD 36TH COLUMBIA LAKESHORE NICOLAI 31ST V BLISS AUGHN 93RD 1 19TH The Columbia River Crossing project(CRC) is expanding transit options between Portland and Vancouver. This bi-state project will extend an existing 52-mile light rail system across the Columbia River to connect the region’s largest and most concentrated employment area in downtown Portland with Vancouver. This extension will improve connections, reliability 23RD and travel times for riders. VIST A LOMBARD GREELEY HAYDEN ISLAND The Columbia River Crossing Project (CRC) is expanding transit options in Vancouver and will improve connections, reliability and travel times for riders. LAKESHORE 21ST 21ST W BROAD N MARINE DR MARINE N FRONT SIMPSON 94TH A N JANTZEN N Vancouver Y GOING 16TH N H BERNIE GREELEY A 18TH Y D A 109TH E VE LOVEJOY N I S L I405 A N 6TH D 11TH 11TH D LINCOLN R R FOU KAUFFMAN 9TH L 3RD 4TH LINCOLN B PLAIN TH 13TH ST 13TH 15TH ST 8TH ST 8TH T NAI Portland 149TH BARBUR 45TH O 139TH MCLOUGHLIN BL UNION ALDER VD L KEL HARBOR OREGON N T O N MARINE DR MARINE N M Y A H A COLUMBI N W A WASHINGTON ST HOOD W K MAIN ST I5 I S T ASHING VD L 39TH A N POR DELL Highway Improvements D BROADW Existing Highway and Bridge AY ST Proposed Light Rail Alignment ST 17TH Existing MAX Yellow Line HAZEL Proposed Park and Ride Proposed Light Rail Stations D L MARQUAM B R TLAND VD
    [Show full text]
  • Facts About Trimet
    Facts about TriMet Ridership TriMet is a national leader in providing transit service. TriMet carries more people than nearly every other U.S. transit system its size. Weekly ridership on buses and MAX has increased for all but one year in the past 23 years. TriMet ridership has outpaced population growth and daily vehicle miles traveled for more than a decade. During fiscal year 2011 Residents and visitors boarded a bus, MAX or WES train 100 million times: • 58.4 million were bus trips • 41.2 million were MAX trips • 370,800 were WES trips TriMet’s service area covers 570 square miles within the tri-county region with a Weekday boardings averaged population of 1.5 million people. 318,500 trips: • 190,300 were bus trips Portland is the 24th-largest metro easing traffic congestion and helping • 126,800 were MAX trips area in the U.S., but transit ridership keep our air clean. That adds up to • 1,450 were WES trips is 7th per capita. 28.6 million fewer car trips each year. Weekend ridership: More people ride TriMet than transit TriMet’s MAX and buses combined systems in larger cities, such as eliminate 207,300 daily car trips, or • Bus and MAX ridership averaged Dallas, Denver and San Diego. 65 million trips each year. 343,900 trips. For each mile taken on TriMet, 53% Maintaining livability less carbon is emitted compared to Easing traffic congestion driving alone. MAX carries 26% of evening rush- Annual Ridership Growth Bus, MAX & WES hour commuters traveling from 105 downtown on the Sunset Hwy.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Guided Tour of Urban Design Precedents
    Self-Guided Tour Urban Design Precedents Introduction This packet contains 7 self-guided tours of successful public and private spaces in the Milwaukie area. These precedents (and others) could be models for development in downtown Milwaukie. The tour is designed to be an opportunity to experience each place; identify the characteristics that make them unique and successful; and consider how various components might work in downtown Milwaukie. Each page notes the components of the space that are particularly relevant. The Tour The below list is a suggested tour route. If you visit the sites in the order listed, your route from Milwaukie will take you counter-clockwise to the east, north, and west. You can also reverse the order to end at Belmont Dairy. A map is provided on the back of this page. 1. Belmont Dairy, SE Belmont and Morrison between SE 34th and 35th 2. Esther Short Park, 301 W 8th Ave, Vancouver 3. Mississippi Marketplace, N Mississippi Ave and N Skidmore St 4. Laughing Planet Plaza, N Mississippi Ave between Beech and Failing 5. Jamison Square, 810 NW 11th Ave 6. Director Park, 815 SW Park Ave 7. Millennium Plaza, 200 1st St, Lake Oswego If You Have Time… If you are interested in additional examples, the following may also be of interest: • SW Pennoyer St, South Waterfront • SW Hall and SW Moody, The Strand development, South Waterfront • Saturday Market pavilion and Ankeny Plaza COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING • ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT • ENGINEERING • PLANNING 6101 SE Johnson Creek Blvd., Milwaukie, Oregon 97206 P) 503-786-7600 / F) 503-774-8236 www.cityofmilwaukie.org Self-Guided Tour Map (Additional examples not shown) Belmont Dairy SE 34th Avenue between SE Belmont & SE Morrison The Belmont Dairy is a successful infill development that complements the materials and scale of the surrounding commercial and residential buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Routeahead: Prioritization of Future Capital Projects
    •Click to edit Master text styles RouteAhead: Prioritization of Future Capital Projects SPC on Transportation & Transit Misty Sklar, A/Manager, Transit Planning - Calgary Transit Author/Owner Position,2020 November Department 17 Report # # TT2020-1289 ISC:Attachment Unrestricted # ISC: Restricted / Unrestricted 1 •Click to edit Master text styles RouteAhead • Long-term strategic plan to guide both operational and capital investments in transit • Capital Investment Prioritization has not been updated in 7 years • Council directed Administration “to use the framework and list of major transit growth projects for prioritizing the future stages of growth of the rapid transit network.” 2 •Click to edit Master text styles RouteAhead Network Progress Rapid Transit Network • Major construction has been completed on many Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Network projects, with service commencing on the: • MAX Orange, • MAX Purple, • MAX Teal and • MAX Yellow lines. • These projects account for 158 kilometers of the 342 kilometers of rapid transit projects planned which equals 46 percent. 3 •Click to edit Master text styles Project List 4 •Click to edit Master text styles Key Points • Prioritization does not include Green Line • Benefits analysis used 2048 • Capital and Operating Costs for 30-years (NPV) 5 •Click to edit Master text styles Prioritization Process • Two Dimensional Process Benefits Using Weighted Criteria • Evaluated benefits using Environmental 10% weighted criteria Ridership • Compared with capital and 30% operating investments Social 20%
    [Show full text]