DOCSLIB.ORG

Relazione Finanziaria Semestrale 2020 ALTRI INVESTIMENTI PARTECIPATIVI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Relazione Finanziaria Semestrale 2020 ALTRI INVESTIMENTI PARTECIPATIVI Relazione Finanziaria Semestrale 2020 ALTRI INVESTIMENTI PARTECIPATIVI 62,50% FoF Private Debt 76,69% FoF Venture Capital 20,83% Fondo Italiano d’Investimento Fondo di Fondi 20,83% Fondo Italiano d’Investimento FII Venture 74,32% Fondo Innovazione e Sviluppo 71,43% Fondo FII Tech Growth 100,00% FoF Private Equity Italia Fondo Atlante 11,77% 12,90% Italian Recovery Fund Fondo QuattroR 100,00% 59,10% 100,00% 100,00% 100,00% 100,00% 70,00% quote A 41,96% quote B 0,21% FSI I quote A 35,81% quote B 0,25% CDP EQUITY S.p.A. CDP RETI S.p.A. CDP INDUSTRIA S.p.A. SACE S.p.A. FINTECNA S.p.A. CDP IMMOBILIARE S.r.l. CDP INVESTIMENTI SGR S.p.A. 49,50% Vertis Venture 3 Technology Transfer (**) 37,60% Residenziale 360 PoliMi TT Fund (**) Ansaldo 100,00% Eni S.p.A. 25,96% 87,57% Terna S.p.A. 29,85% Saipem S.p.A. 12,55% SIMEST S.p.A. 76,01% Immobiliare 2004 S.p.A. Energia S.p.A. 49,50% Progress Tech Transfer SLP-RAIF (**) 35,00% 100,00% 50,00% Poste Italiane S.p.A. 71,32% SACE FCT S.p.A. 100,00% Alfiere S.p.A. EAF S.C.A. SICAR – Caravella (Fondo Caravella) Open Fiber S.p.A. 50,00% Fincantieri S.p.A. 18,50% Telecom Sofinnova Telethon SCA (**) 9,89% M.T. Manifattura Italia S.p.A. B.F. S.p.A. 18,79% Snam S.p.A. 31,04% SACE BT S.p.A. 100,00% 40,00% 25,14% Tabacchi S.p.A. Springrowth – Fondo di credito diversificato 100% 21,87% Treccani S.p.A. 7,42% HI CrescItalia PMI Hotelturist S.p.A. Manifatture 45,95% 13,50% 50,00% SACE Srv S.r.l. Milano S.p.A. 16,16% Anthilia BIT III Elite S.p.A. 15,00% SACE do Brasil 100,00% Webuild S.p.A. 18,68% Cinque Cerchi S.p.A. 100,00% Oltre II SICAF EuVECA S.p.A. (***) 17,55% Italgas S.p.A. 26,04% African Trade 4,23% 1,11% CDP Venture Insurance Company European Investment Fund Capital SGR S.p.A. 70,00% Quadrifoglio Fondo Sviluppo 100,00% 2,21% 100,00% Modena S.p.A. Istituto per il Credito Sportivo Export Fondo Italiano 68,00% F2i - Secondo Fondo Italiano per le Infrastrutture d’Investimento SGR S.p.A. quote A 8,05% quote C 0,02% Consorzi e altri 4,17% F2i - Terzo Fondo per le Infrastrutture QuattroR SGR S.p.A. 40,00% 14,08% 2020 European Fund for Energy. Climate Change and FSI SGR S.p.A. 39,00% Infrastructure SICAV-FIS S.A. (Fondo Marguerite) 13,42% Marguerite II SCSp (Fondo Marguerite II) F2i - Fondi Italiani per le 14,01% Infrastrutture SGR S.p.A. Inframed Infrastructure S.A.S. à capital variable (Fondo Inframed) 77,12% quote A 38,92% quote B 1,20% European Energy Efficiency Fund S.A., SICAV-SIF (Fondo EEEF) FSI Investimenti S.p.A. quote A 10,42% quote B 1,64% 11,90% Connecting Europe Broadband Fund SICAV RAIF 25,70% 23,00% 70,00% 57,42% Rocco Forte Hotels Ltd FSIA SIA S.p.A. 14,58% Investimenti S.r.l. Fondo PPP Italia 100,00% Fondo Investimenti per la Valorizzazione Extra 25,06% 25,67% 6,99% Trevi Finanziaria SACE S.p.A. Kedrion S.p.A. Industriale S.p.A. Fondo Investimenti per la Valorizzazione Plus 100,00% 49,31% 0,50% (*) 50,00% IQ Made in Italy 28,40% Fondo Investimenti per l’Abitare (FIA) Valvitalia Finanziaria S.p.A. Investment Inalca S.p.A. Company S.p.A. 100,00% Fondo Investimenti per il Turismo (FIT) 100,00% Fondo FIA 2 100,00% Fondo Federal District Fondo Immobiliare di Lombardia - 3,57% Comparto Uno (già Abitare Sociale 1) Fondi comuni di investimento Tipo di controllo/influenza Società in liquidazione: () 49,5% proorma post conversione Prestito Obbligazionario Convertibile. Veicoli societari di investimento () Fondo lanciato nell’ambito della Piattaorma d’investimento IAtech, contratto di gestione e co-investimento tra Controllo Influenza notevole Europrogetti & Finanza S.r.l. 31,80% Cinque Cerchi S.p.A. 100% CDP e FEI con ocus in ondi di traserimento tecnologico. Rapporto di gestione ondi XXI Aprile S.r.l. 100% Pentagramma Romagna S.p.A.100% () Fondo lanciato nell’ambito della Piattaorma Social Impact Italia, contratto di gestione e co-investimento tra CDP Controllo di atto Controllo congiunto Bonaous S.p.A. 100% Pentagramma Piemonte S.p.A. 50% e FEI con ocus su investimenti a impatto sociale. ALTRI INVESTIMENTI PARTECIPATIVI 62,50% FoF Private Debt 76,69% FoF Venture Capital 20,83% Fondo Italiano d’Investimento Fondo di Fondi 20,83% Fondo Italiano d’Investimento FII Venture 74,32% Fondo Innovazione e Sviluppo 71,43% Fondo FII Tech Growth 100,00% FoF Private Equity Italia Fondo Atlante 11,77% 12,90% Italian Recovery Fund Fondo QuattroR 100,00% 59,10% 100,00% 100,00% 100,00% 100,00% 70,00% quote A 41,96% quote B 0,21% FSI I quote A 35,81% quote B 0,25% CDP EQUITY S.p.A. CDP RETI S.p.A. CDP INDUSTRIA S.p.A. SACE S.p.A. FINTECNA S.p.A. CDP IMMOBILIARE S.r.l. CDP INVESTIMENTI SGR S.p.A. 49,50% Vertis Venture 3 Technology Transfer (**) 37,60% Residenziale 360 PoliMi TT Fund (**) Ansaldo 100,00% Eni S.p.A. 25,96% 87,57% Terna S.p.A. 29,85% Saipem S.p.A. 12,55% SIMEST S.p.A. 76,01% Immobiliare 2004 S.p.A. Energia S.p.A. 49,50% Progress Tech Transfer SLP-RAIF (**) 35,00% 100,00% 50,00% Poste Italiane S.p.A. 71,32% SACE FCT S.p.A. 100,00% Alfiere S.p.A. EAF S.C.A. SICAR – Caravella (Fondo Caravella) Open Fiber S.p.A. 50,00% Fincantieri S.p.A. 18,50% Telecom Sofinnova Telethon SCA (**) 9,89% M.T. Manifattura Italia S.p.A. B.F. S.p.A. 18,79% Snam S.p.A. 31,04% SACE BT S.p.A. 100,00% 40,00% 25,14% Tabacchi S.p.A. Springrowth – Fondo di credito diversificato 100% 21,87% Treccani S.p.A. 7,42% HI CrescItalia PMI Hotelturist S.p.A. Manifatture 45,95% 13,50% 50,00% SACE Srv S.r.l. Milano S.p.A. 16,16% Anthilia BIT III Elite S.p.A. 15,00% SACE do Brasil 100,00% Webuild S.p.A. 18,68% Cinque Cerchi S.p.A. 100,00% Oltre II SICAF EuVECA S.p.A. (***) 17,55% Italgas S.p.A. 26,04% African Trade 4,23% 1,11% CDP Venture Insurance Company European Investment Fund Capital SGR S.p.A. 70,00% Quadrifoglio Fondo Sviluppo 100,00% 2,21% 100,00% Modena S.p.A. Istituto per il Credito Sportivo Export Fondo Italiano 68,00% F2i - Secondo Fondo Italiano per le Infrastrutture d’Investimento SGR S.p.A. quote A 8,05% quote C 0,02% Consorzi e altri 4,17% F2i - Terzo Fondo per le Infrastrutture QuattroR SGR S.p.A. 40,00% 14,08% 2020 European Fund for Energy. Climate Change and FSI SGR S.p.A. 39,00% Infrastructure SICAV-FIS S.A. (Fondo Marguerite) 13,42% Marguerite II SCSp (Fondo Marguerite II) F2i - Fondi Italiani per le 14,01% Infrastrutture SGR S.p.A. Inframed Infrastructure S.A.S. à capital variable (Fondo Inframed) 77,12% quote A 38,92% quote B 1,20% European Energy Efficiency Fund S.A., SICAV-SIF (Fondo EEEF) FSI Investimenti S.p.A. quote A 10,42% quote B 1,64% 11,90% Connecting Europe Broadband Fund SICAV RAIF 25,70% 23,00% 70,00% 57,42% Rocco Forte Hotels Ltd FSIA SIA S.p.A. 14,58% Investimenti S.r.l. Fondo PPP Italia 100,00% Fondo Investimenti per la Valorizzazione Extra 25,06% 25,67% 6,99% Trevi Finanziaria SACE S.p.A. Kedrion S.p.A. Industriale S.p.A. Fondo Investimenti per la Valorizzazione Plus 100,00% 49,31% 0,50% (*) 50,00% IQ Made in Italy 28,40% Fondo Investimenti per l’Abitare (FIA) Valvitalia Finanziaria S.p.A. Investment Inalca S.p.A. Company S.p.A. 100,00% Fondo Investimenti per il Turismo (FIT) 100,00% Fondo FIA 2 100,00% Fondo Federal District Fondo Immobiliare di Lombardia - 3,57% Comparto Uno (già Abitare Sociale 1) Fondi comuni di investimento Tipo di controllo/influenza Società in liquidazione: () 49,5% proorma post conversione Prestito Obbligazionario Convertibile. Veicoli societari di investimento () Fondo lanciato nell’ambito della Piattaorma d’investimento IAtech, contratto di gestione e co-investimento tra Controllo Influenza notevole Europrogetti & Finanza S.r.l. 31,80% Cinque Cerchi S.p.A. 100% CDP e FEI con ocus in ondi di traserimento tecnologico. Rapporto di gestione ondi XXI Aprile S.r.l. 100% Pentagramma Romagna S.p.A.100% () Fondo lanciato nell’ambito della Piattaorma Social Impact Italia, contratto di gestione e co-investimento tra CDP Controllo di atto Controllo congiunto Bonaous S.p.A. 100% Pentagramma Piemonte S.p.A. 50% e FEI con ocus su investimenti a impatto sociale. Un Gruppo unico al servizio del Paese Relazione Finanziaria Semestrale 2020 Indice Principali dati al 30 giugno 2020 4 Cariche sociali e governance 5 01 Presentazione del Gruppo CDP 9 02 Relazione intermedia sulla gestione 13 1. Gruppo CDP 14 2. Contesto di mercato 21 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Up to EUR 3,500,000.00 7% Fixed Rate Bonds Due 6 April 2026 ISIN
    Up to EUR 3,500,000.00 7% Fixed Rate Bonds due 6 April 2026 ISIN IT0005440976 Terms and Conditions Executed by EPizza S.p.A. 4126-6190-7500.7 This Terms and Conditions are dated 6 April 2021. EPizza S.p.A., a company limited by shares incorporated in Italy as a società per azioni, whose registered office is at Piazza Castello n. 19, 20123 Milan, Italy, enrolled with the companies’ register of Milan-Monza-Brianza- Lodi under No. and fiscal code No. 08950850969, VAT No. 08950850969 (the “Issuer”). *** The issue of up to EUR 3,500,000.00 (three million and five hundred thousand /00) 7% (seven per cent.) fixed rate bonds due 6 April 2026 (the “Bonds”) was authorised by the Board of Directors of the Issuer, by exercising the powers conferred to it by the Articles (as defined below), through a resolution passed on 26 March 2021. The Bonds shall be issued and held subject to and with the benefit of the provisions of this Terms and Conditions. All such provisions shall be binding on the Issuer, the Bondholders (and their successors in title) and all Persons claiming through or under them and shall endure for the benefit of the Bondholders (and their successors in title). The Bondholders (and their successors in title) are deemed to have notice of all the provisions of this Terms and Conditions and the Articles. Copies of each of the Articles and this Terms and Conditions are available for inspection during normal business hours at the registered office for the time being of the Issuer being, as at the date of this Terms and Conditions, at Piazza Castello n.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence from SME Bond Markets
    Temi di discussione (Working Papers) Asymmetric information in corporate lending: evidence from SME bond markets by Alessandra Iannamorelli, Stefano Nobili, Antonio Scalia and Luana Zaccaria September 2020 September Number 1292 Temi di discussione (Working Papers) Asymmetric information in corporate lending: evidence from SME bond markets by Alessandra Iannamorelli, Stefano Nobili, Antonio Scalia and Luana Zaccaria Number 1292 - September 2020 The papers published in the Temi di discussione series describe preliminary results and are made available to the public to encourage discussion and elicit comments. The views expressed in the articles are those of the authors and do not involve the responsibility of the Bank. Editorial Board: Federico Cingano, Marianna Riggi, Monica Andini, Audinga Baltrunaite, Marco Bottone, Davide Delle Monache, Sara Formai, Francesco Franceschi, Salvatore Lo Bello, Juho Taneli Makinen, Luca Metelli, Mario Pietrunti, Marco Savegnago. Editorial Assistants: Alessandra Giammarco, Roberto Marano. ISSN 1594-7939 (print) ISSN 2281-3950 (online) Printed by the Printing and Publishing Division of the Bank of Italy ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION IN CORPORATE LENDING: EVIDENCE FROM SME BOND MARKETS by Alessandra Iannamorelli†, Stefano Nobili†, Antonio Scalia† and Luana Zaccaria‡ Abstract Using a comprehensive dataset of Italian SMEs, we find that differences between private and public information on creditworthiness affect firms’ decisions to issue debt securities. Surprisingly, our evidence supports positive (rather than adverse) selection. Holding public information constant, firms with better private fundamentals are more likely to access bond markets. Additionally, credit conditions improve for issuers following the bond placement, compared with a matched sample of non-issuers. These results are consistent with a model where banks offer more flexibility than markets during financial distress and firms may use market lending to signal credit quality to outside stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinnacle Notes Frequently Asked Questions 18
    PINNACLE NOTES FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 18 DECEMBER 20081 These Frequently Asked Questions have been prepared by Pinnacle Performance Limited for the distributors of the Pinnacle notes in Singapore in response to questions about the Pinnacle notes generally. Any questions from investors should be raised with the institution that sold them the Pinnacle notes in Singapore. Please read the important notice at the end of this document. 1. What are the Pinnacle notes? The Pinnacle notes are the Series 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15 and 16 notes issued by Pinnacle Performance Limited (the "Issuer"). Some of the Pinnacle notes are equity- linked notes and some are credit-linked notes. The Pinnacle equity-linked notes and the Pinnacle credit-linked notes are together referred to in this document as the "Pinnacle notes". 2. What are the Pinnacle equity-linked notes? The Pinnacle equity-linked notes (the "Pinnacle equity-linked notes") are the Series 8, 11, 12, 15 and 16 notes issued by the Issuer. An equity-linked note is, in general terms, a structured note where the return and/or interest on the note is determined by reference to, amongst other things, the performance of one or more shares or share indices. Investors in a Series of Pinnacle equity-linked notes should also refer to the Frequently Asked Questions in relation to Pinnacle equity-linked notes dated 14 November 2008 for further information. A copy of these Frequently Asked Questions is available on the website referred to in the important notice below. 3. What are the Pinnacle credit-linked notes? The Pinnacle credit-linked notes (the "Pinnacle credit-linked notes") are the Series 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10 notes issued by the Issuer.
    [Show full text]
  • Valuation Adjustments 6 Ntnze
    0 0 ·~rf'J. ·~> ·~Q Q) 8 0 u 0 ~ ~ Q) ~ ·~ ~ t 0 ~ Q) ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ u ~ ·s:t:::: .0 fJl Od 00 b ...... 0 ~ W,o c:: 0 0 co 0 ~ :iQ 0 :::. ·~ @ Ql ~ ~ .;:: ~ $: ~ ~ ~ ~ .D ~ ro Cl) > ~ ~ LBEX-WGM 002234 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC. t""'('l rn~ ~~ ~ti ~~ t:l:i>-l ~> Contents >-lt""" :::r:...., I [/).>~G; :::r:...., 1. Executive Summary 3-5 0~ t""'tn z....,oz @G; "!0 JL Valuation Adjustments 6 ntnze . [/)....., Significant Changes 7 0 Summary 8 ~ Regional Matrix 9 Americas 10- 11 Europe 12-13 Asia 14-15 Monthly Changes 16-17 UL Pricing Report 18 r Explanation of Significant Variances 19-23 m m >< Coverage 24-25 Projects 26-28 :s:~ 0 0 1\.) 1\.) (.,) 0'1 LEHlvfAN BROTHERS 2 t""'('l rn~ ~~ ~ti ~~ t:l:i>-l ~> Executive summary >-lt""" :::r:...., Complex Derivatives Transaction Review Committee [/).>~G; :::r:...., This committee, consisting of Capital Market Finance, Accounting Policy and Model Validation personnel, was set up in April 2005 and meets to 0~ t""'tn consider any significant derivative transactions undertaken. The committee considers whether the transactions are being booked, valued and z....,oz modeled appropriately. Furthermore, the committee determines whether the proper accounting treatment is being applied. During the month, the @G; following transactions were reviewed: "!0 ntnze . [/)....., -----+Emerging Market Loan with FX Call Spread- Lehman loaned ¥6 billion to Astana, a Kazakhstan quasi-sovereign entity. In addition, Lehman entered into a currency swap with Astana to convert the JPY loan into USD. Lehman also purchased a FX call spread from 0 Astana.
    [Show full text]
  • Derivative Choices of Retail Investors: Evidence from Germany
    Derivative Choices of Retail Investors: Evidence from Germany David Nicolaus * This version: December 16 th ,2010 Abstract: During the last few years, a strong growth of retail derivative markets has been observed in a number of financial retail markets around the world. Using a unique data set, we confront in this paper several lines of arguments that have been provided to explain the observed popularity of the instrument with data from the German secondary market. We analyze a number of determinants that are likely to affect the derivative choices of retail investors. We further analyze the performance of retail derivatives chosen by retail investors and propose a new sentiment measure to analyze the information content of the observed choices for the underlying asset. Our results support previous studies that argue that an increase in the need for specifying the characteristics of financial products and consequently an increase in retail investors’ search costs contribute to the observed popularity of retail derivatives. However, the observed pattern in derivative choices also supports other studies that argue that the retail demand for derivatives is driven by systematic deviations of retail investors from rational behaviour. Our analysis of the performance of the products chosen by retail investors further reveals that the trading behaviour that is likely to underlie the observed derivative choices results in a performance loss compared to a more diversified portfolio. We conclude that retail derivative markets emphasize the importance of situational and investor specific factors for retail investors’ portfolio choices that might counteract the welfare improving potential of this instrument. Keywords: Retail derivatives, certificates, investor behaviour, momentum, contrarian, sentiment JEL Codes: G11, G12, D83 * Finance Department and Center for Financial Studies at Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, corresponding email address [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Confidential Treatment Requested by Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc
    CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC. LBEX-WGM 763319 Valuation & Control Report - Fixed Income Division June 2008 • r mOJ >< LEHMAN BROTHERS ~ G) Where vision built. s" ~ gets --....1 (J) w w 1\.) 0 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC. Contents I I. Executive Summary 3-5 II. Valuation Adjustments 6 Significant Changes 7 Summary 8 Regional Matrix 9 Americas 10-11 Europe 12-13 Asia 14-15 Monthly Changes 16-17 III. Pricing Report 18 Explanation of Significant Variances 19-24 Coverage 25-26 r mOJ Projects 27-30 >< ~ G) ~ --....1 (J) w LEHMAN BROTHERS 2 w 1\.) .....lo. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS, INC. LBEX-WGM 763322 Executive summary Complex Derivatives Transaction Review Committee This committee, consisting of Capital Market Finance, Accounting Policy and Model Validation personnel, was set up in April2005 and meets to consider any significant derivative transactions undertaken. The committee considers whether the transactions are being booked, valued and modeled appropriately. Furthermore, the committee determines whether the proper accounting treatment is being applied. During the month, the following transactions were reviewed: -+Callable Credit Default Swap- Lehman sold $50 million of credit protection on Rio Tinto. The trade matures in October 2009. The premium that Lehman receives on the trade will be the greater of: 1) 105 bps per annum and 2) 105 bps per annum plus the change in the spread of the on-the-run iTraxx index. Furthermore, the counterparty can call the trade on specified dates with the first call date in October 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • MPS-Bilancio ING 2015 Layout 1
    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2015 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT 31 DECEMBER 2015 Financial Statements at 31 December 2015 MPS CAPITAL SERVICES BANCA PER LE IMPRESE Table of contents - Report on Operations 13 Reference Context 15 Significant Aspects of Operations 18 Credit Aggregates 22 Deposits 30 Main financial aggregates 32 Equity Investments 42 Main economic aggregates and operating indicators 43 Risk governance 46 The equity position 47 Human Resources 48 Organisational and Technological Trends 50 Internal Audit 51 Compliance 53 Environmental Issues 55 Relations with Group companies 56 Significant Subsequent Events and Outlook on Operations 57 Proposals to the Shareholders’ Meeting 58 - Financial Statements 59 - Notes to the Financial Statements 71 Part A - Accounting Policies 73 Part B - Notes to the Balance Sheet 117 Part C - Notes to the Income Statement 187 Part D - Comprehensive Income 211 Part E - Information on Risks and Related Hedging Policies 212 Part F - Information on Equity 298 Part G - Business Combinations regarding companies or business units 314 Part H - Transactions with related parties 315 Part I - Share-based Payments 320 Part L - Segment Reporting 321 Attachments to the Notes to the Statements 323 - Certification Report 337 - Report of the Board of Statutory Auditors 341 5 MPS CAPITAL SERVICES BANCA PER LE IMPRESE Financial Statements at 31 December 2015 Company Profile Name MPS CAPITAL SERVICES BANCA PER LE IMPRESE S.p.A. “Monte dei Paschi di Siena” banking Group General Information MPS Capital Services Banca per le Imprese SpA (MPSCS) is the Corporate & Investment Bank of the Monte dei Paschi di Siena Banking Group (BMPS Group), specialised in financial support and advice to the Corporate, Public Bodies and Institutional segment.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapporto Sulla Stabilità Finanziaria 2 / 2020
    Rapporto sulla stabilità finanziaria Rapporto sulla stabilità finanziaria 2 2020 2 / 2014 novembre 2020 Rapporto sulla stabilità finanziaria Numero 2 / 2020 Novembre Le altre pubblicazioni economiche della Banca d’Italia sono le seguenti: Relazione annuale Un resoconto annuale dei principali sviluppi dell’economia italiana e internazionale Bollettino economico Un resoconto trimestrale degli andamenti congiunturali dell’economia italiana e internazionale Economie regionali Una serie di analisi sull’economia delle regioni italiane Temi di discussione (Working Papers) Collana di studi economici, empirici e teorici Questioni di economia e finanza (Occasional Papers) Una miscellanea di studi su temi di particolare rilevanza per l’attività della Banca d’Italia Newsletter sulla ricerca economica Un aggiornamento sulle ricerche e sui convegni recenti Quaderni di storia economica Collana di analisi storica dell’economia italiana Queste pubblicazioni sono disponibili su internet all’indirizzo: www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni Copie a stampa possono essere richieste alla casella della Biblioteca Paolo Baffi: [email protected] © Banca d’Italia, 2020 Per la pubblicazione cartacea: autorizzazione del Tribunale civile di Roma n. 209/2010 del 13 maggio 2010 Per la pubblicazione telematica: autorizzazione del Tribunale civile di Roma n. 212/2010 del 13 maggio 2010 Direttore responsabile Eugenio Gaiotti Comitato di redazione Alessio De Vincenzo e Pierluigi Bologna (coordinatori), Piergiorgio Alessandri, Nicola Branzoli, Mario Cappabianca,
    [Show full text]
  • European Super Senior New Money Study
    European Super Senior New Money Study J U L Y 2 0 2 1 Houlihan Lokey is the trusted advisor to more top decision- makers than any other independent global investment bank. Corporate Finance Financial Restructuring Financial and Valuation Advisory 2020 M&A Advisory Rankings 2020 Global Distressed Debt & Bankruptcy 2001 to 2020 Global M&A Fairness All U.S. Transactions Restructuring Rankings Advisory Rankings Advisor Deals Advisor Deals Advisor Deals 1 Houlihan Lokey 210 1 Houlihan Lokey 106 1 Houlihan Lokey 956 2 Goldman Sachs & Co 172 2 PJT Partners Inc 63 2 JP Morgan 876 3 JP Morgan 132 3 Lazard 50 3 Duff & Phelps 802 4 Evercore Partners 126 4 Rothschild & Co 46 4 Morgan Stanley 599 5 Morgan Stanley 123 5 Moelis & Co 39 5 BofA Securities Inc 542 Refinitiv (formerly known as Thomson Reuters). Announced Source: Refinitiv (formerly known as Thomson Reuters) Source: Refinitiv (formerly known as Thomson Reuters) or completed transactions. No. 1 U.S. M&A Advisor No. 1 Global Restructuring Advisor No. 1 Global M&A Fairness Opinion Advisor Over the Past 20 Years Top 5 Global M&A Advisor 1,400+ Transactions Completed Valued at More Than $3.0 Trillion 1,000+ Annual Valuation Leading Capital Markets Advisor Collectively Engagements 2 Financial and Valuation Advisory Houlihan Lokey is actively tracking the space as more super senior instruments require an independent valuation or fairness opinion issued to boards of directors. Houlihan Lokey is highly experienced in providing valuations and fairness opinions to facilitate the negotiation and implementation of companies’ potential injection of new money.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lehman Minibonds Crisis in Hong Kong 547
    2009 The Lehman Minibonds Crisis in Hong Kong 547 THE LEHMAN MINIBONDS CRISIS IN HONG KONG: LESSONS FOR PLAIN LANGUAGE RISK DISCLOSURE ANDREW GODWIN* I INTRODUCTION The trigger for this article was the crisis caused by the collapse of an investment product arranged by Lehman Brothers Asia Limited and marketed in Hong Kong1 under the name ‘Minibonds’. As outlined in Part III below, this product proved popular among retail investors, many of whom incurred substantial losses as a result of the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and companies associated with it in September 2008. The crisis sparked investigations by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission2 (‘SFC’) and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority3 (‘HKMA’), each of which issued a report on the crisis at the end of 2008.4 As part of its regulatory response to the crisis, the SFC urged the issuers of retail investment products ‘to ensure that their applications and related offering documents and marketing materials contain clear upfront explanations of the * Andrew Godwin is Senior Lecturer at the Melbourne Law School and Associate Director (Asian Commercial Law) of the Asian Law Centre, The University of Melbourne. He consults in the area of contract drafting and the use of plain language techniques. He would like to thank Andrew Malcolm of Linklaters Hong Kong for his insightful comments on risk awareness and also the anonymous referees for their constructive comments and suggestions. All views, errors and omissions are this writer’s alone. 1 The Minibonds were also marketed and sold in Singapore, where a similar crisis arose.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilancio Al 30 Giugno 2017 Bozza
    Bozza LXXI ESERCIZIO Bilancio al 30 giugno 2017 Assemblea dei Soci del 28 ottobre 2017 SOCIETÀ PER AZIONI CAPITALE SOCIALE VERSATO € 440.617.579,00 SEDE SOCIALE IN MILANO - PIAZZETTA ENRICO CUCCIA, 1 ISCRITTA ALL’ALBO DELLE BANCHE CAPOGRUPPO DEL GRUPPO BANCARIO MEDIOBANCA ISCRITTO ALL’ALBO DEI GRUPPI BANCARI Assemblea dei Soci al 28 ottobre 2017 www.mediobanca.com CONSIGLIO DI AMMINISTRAZIONE Scadenza del mandato Renato Pagliaro Presidente 2017 * Maurizia Angelo Comneno Vice Presidente 2017 Marco Tronchetti Provera Vice Presidente 2017 * Alberto Nagel Amministratore Delegato 2017 * Francesco Saverio Vinci Direttore Generale 2017 Tarak Ben Ammar Consigliere 2017 Gilberto Benetton Consigliere 2017 Mauro Bini Consigliere 2017 Marie Bolloré Consigliere 2017 Maurizio Carfagna Consigliere 2017 * Angelo Caso’ Consigliere 2017 Maurizio Costa Consigliere 2017 Vanessa Labérenne Consigliere 2017 Elisabetta Magistretti Consigliere 2017 Alberto Pecci Consigliere 2017 * Gian Luca Sichel Consigliere 2017 * Alexandra Young Consigliere 2017 * Membri del Comitato Esecutivo COLLEGIO SINDACALE Natale Freddi Presidente 2017 Laura Gualtieri Sindaco Effettivo 2017 Gabriele Villa Sindaco Effettivo 2017 Alessandro Trotter Sindaco Supplente 2017 Barbara Negri Sindaco Supplente 2017 Silvia Olivotto Sindaco Supplente 2017 *** Massimo Bertolini Dirigente Preposto alla redazione dei documenti contabili societari e Segretario del Consiglio www.mediobanca.com INDICE Bilancio consolidato Relazione sulla Gestione del Gruppo Mediobanca al 30 giugno 2017 11 Attestazione
    [Show full text]
  • Costs of Raising (Social) Capital Through Mini-Bonds
    Costs of Raising (Social) Capital Through Mini-Bonds Todd L. Ely and Christine R. Martell* Public offi cials use mini-bonds, small denomination municipal bonds, as a mechanism to broaden citizen access to tax-exempt investments that fi nance public infrastructure. Marketing debt securities to smaller investors comes with costs, but a popular expecta- tion is that such offerings strengthen local social capital. This paper provides a historical overview of the use of mini-bonds, including the rationale and challenges. It then uses a series of mini-bond issuances by the City and County of Denver from 1990 to 2014 to illustrate the differences in issuance and interest costs compared to traditional municipal bonds, as well as investor access outcomes. A series of considerations for public offi cials contemplating the issuance of mini-bonds is included. Mini-bonds present a conscious fi nancing decision where the additional and substantial costs can be quantifi ed, but the anticipated benefi ts of increased publicity about public projects and more equitable investor access are more diffi cult to value. INTRODUCTION ax-exempt municipal bonds are a primary source of long-term fi nancing for state and local governments. Traditionally, such T bonds are sold in $5,000 increments and are especially desirable to high-income investors, because they receive relatively greater fi nancial benefi t from the tax-exempt interest. Issuing municipal bonds is costly and requires the assistance of a wide range of fi nancial intermediaries. These costs of issuance decline, as a percentage of the funds raised, with increases in the amount of debt issued.
    [Show full text]