DOCSLIB.ORG

Movement Control in a Theater of Operations Ss®?Sss

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Movement Control in a Theater of Operations Ss®?Sss fJ?f<y FM 55-10 MOVEMENT CONTROL IN A THEATER OF OPERATIONS SS®?SSS- DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY y i I' *FM 55-10 HEADQUARTERS Field Manual 55-10 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Washington, DC, 8 December 1992 MOVEMENT CONTROL IN A THEATER OF OPERATIONS CONTENTS Page PREFACE vii CHAPTER 1. MOVEMENT CONTROL IN THE OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT Section I. OVERVIEW 1-1. Introduction 1-1 1-2. Levels of War 1-1 Section II. MOVEMENT SYNCHRONIZATION COMPONENTS 1-3. Introduction 1-2 1-4. Movement Control 1-3 1-5. Movement Control and Maneuver 1-3 1-6. Battlefield Circulation Control 1-4 1-7. Basic Principles of Movement Control 1-4 1-8. Sustainment Imperatives 1-5 Section HI. AIRLAND BATTLE OPERATIONS 1-9. Introduction 1-5 1-10. AirLand Battle Doctrine 1-5 1-11. Combat Operations 1-7 Section IV. BASIC APPLICATIONS OF HOST-NATION SUPPORT 1-12. Introduction 1-8 1-13. Host-Nation Support 1-8 CHAPTER 2. STRATEGIC MOVEMENT CONTROL Section I. STRATEGIC DEPLOYMENT 2-1. Introduction . 2-1 2-2. Strategic Deployment .2-1 2-3. Strategic Deployment Planning 2-2 2-4. Strategic Deployment Planning Systems 2-2 2-5. Strategic Deployment Movement Control Organizations 2-4 2-6. Unit Deployment 2-6 Section II. THEATER MOVEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM 2-7. Introduction 2-7 2-8. Command Relationships 2-7 DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. *This'pubfieât'ion?s'upersedês‘FM'55*l(');'22',J'ulÿ’î986. FM 55-10 Page 2-9. Transportation and Logistics Arrangements in a Joint Force 2-9 2- 10. Theater Joint Movement Control Organizations 2-10 CHAPTER 3. MOVEMENT CONTROL AT ECHELONS ABOVE CORPS Section I. THEATER ARMY ORGANIZATION 3- 1. Introduction 3-1 3-2. TA Headquarters 3-1 3-3. TA Organization 3-1 / 3-4. Staff Functions 3-1 Section II. MOVEMENT CONTROL ORGANIZATIONS AT EAC 3-5. Introduction 3-2 3-6. Theater Army Movement Control Agency 3-2 3-7. Tremsportation Battalions (MC) 3-9 Section III. MOVEMENT CONTROL TEAMS 3-8. Introduction 3-11 3-9. Air Terminal Movement Control Teams 3-13 3-10. ATMCT Operations Versus A/DACG 3-14 3-11. Movement Regulating Team 3-14 3- 12. Allocation Rules 3-14 CHAPTER 4. MOVEMENT CONTROL IN THE CORPS 4- 1. Introduction 4-1 4-2. Corps Staff 4-1 4-3. Corps Support Command 4-2 4-4. Functional Relationships 4-7 4- 5. MCC/CSG Interface 4-7 CHAPTERS. MOVEMENT CONTROL IN THE DIVISION 5- 1. Introduction 5-1 5-2. Organization 5-1 5-3. Transportation Requests 5-2 5-4. Division Transportation Officer 5-2 5-5. Highway Regulation 5-3 5- 6. DISCOM Movement Control Officer 5-4 CHAPTER 6. MOVEMENT PLANS, PROGRAMS, AND PROCEDURES 6- 1. Introduction 6-1 6-2. Developing the Movement Program . ; 6-1 6-3. Assessing the Distribution Pattern 6-1 6-4. Determining Requirements 6-2 6-5. Determining Capabilities 6-2 6-6. Balancing Requirements Agmnst Capabilities 6-3 6-7. Determining Critical Points 6-4 6-8. Programming by Schematics 6-4 6-9. Selecting a Mode 6-6 6-10. Coordinating 6-7 6-11. Formatting a Movement Program 6-8 6-12. Executing the Movement Program 6-9 6-13. Preparing the Port Clearance Program 6-9 il FM 55-10 Page CHAPTER?. HIGHWAY REGULATION Section I. PLANNING, ROUTING, AND SCHEDULING 7-1. Introduction 7-1 7-2. Highway Regulation Planning 7-1 7-3. Fundamentals and Principles of Routing 7-3 7-4. Fundamentals and Methods of Scheduling 7-5 7-5. Clearance Requests 7-6 Section II. PLANNING FACTORS 7-6. Introduction 7-6 7-7. Movement Measurement . .7-6 7-8. Time and Distance Factors 7-7 7-9. Time, Distance, and Rate Calculations 7-8 7-10. Arrive and Clear Time Calculations 7-9 7-11. Deconflicting Movements 7-12 7-12. Diverting and Rerouting 7-13 Section HI. LARGE UNIT MOVEMENTS 7-13. Introduction 7-13 7- 14. Planning 7-13 CHAPTER 8. RECEPTION AND ONWARD MOVEMENT OF UNITS 8- 1. Introduction 8-1 8-2. Theater Reception and Onward Movement Process 8-1 8-3. Aerial Port of Debarkation 8-2 8-4. Air-to-Air Interface Operations 8-7 8-5. Seaport of Debarkation 8-7 8-6. Sea-to-Air Interface Operations 8-11 8-7. Onward Movement of Pre-Positioned Material 8-11 8-8. Movement Control During Repositioning 8-12 8- 9. Planning Sequence for Reception and Onward Movement 8-13 CHAPTER 9. INTERMODAL OPERATIONS Section I. CONTAINERS AND SEAPORTS 9- 1. Introduction 9-1 9-2. Container Control 9-1 9-3. Overseas Theater Support 9-1 9-4. Container Destinations 9-1 9-5. Port Ojxrations 9-3 9-6. Container Discharge at Seaports 9-3 9-7. Seaport Clearance 9-4 9-8. Container Operations at EAC 9-6 9-9. Container Operations at Corps and Division 9-6 9-10. Intertheater and Intratheater Container Movements 9-6 9-11. Daily Container Management Activities 9-8 9-12. Container Management Objectives 9-8 9-13. Retrograde Use of Containers 9-9 9-14. Container Documentation 9-9 9-15. Interface with CONUS 9-9 iii FM 55-10 Page Section II. AIR CARGO AND AERIAL PORTS 9-16. Introduction 9-9 9-17. Direct Support System 9-9 9-18. ALOC Subsystem of DSS 9-10 9-19. Order Ship Time Objectives 9-10 9-20. Port Clearance and Input to the HF 9-10 9- 21. Onward Movement and Input to the LIF 9-13 CHAPTER 10. TRANSPORTATION REQUEST PROCESS o Section I. SUPPLY SYSTEM INTERFACE 10- 1. Introduction 10-1 10-2. Supply Requisitions and CONUS Procedures 10-1 Section II. TRANSPORTATION REQUEST PROCEDURES 10-3. Introduction 10-3 10-4. MCT Responsibilities 10-3 10-5. Transportation Request Process 10-6 Section III. REQUEST FOR INTRATHEATER AIRLIFT 10-6. Introduction 10-9 10-7. Army Aviation 10-9 10-8. Air Force Airlift 10-13 Section IV. COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT 10-9. Introduction 10-19 10-10. Communications Support 10-19 10- 11. Information Management 10-19 CHAPTER 11. MOVEMENT CONTROL IN OTHER OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTS Section I. MILITARY OPERATIONS IN LOW-INTENSITY CONFLICT 11- 1. Introduction 11-1 11-2. Low-Intensity Conflict 11-1 11-3. Movement Control Support 11-1 Section II. CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS 11-4. Introduction 11-2 11-5. Corps Contingency Operations 11-2 Section III. NBC OPERATIONS 11-6. Introduction 11-3 11-7. NBC Threats 11-3 11-8. Movement Control Responsibilities 11-4 APPENDIX A. UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND A-l. Introduction A-l A-2. Command Relationships A-l A-3. Communications A-l APPENDIX B. UNITED STATES EUROPEAN COMMAND B-l. Introduction B-l B-2. Command Relationships B-l B-3. Movement Control Organizations B-4 IV FM 55-10 Page B-4. Communications B-6 B-5. First Destination Reporting Points B-6 B-6. Rapid Delivery Service B-6 B-7. Cellular Logistics Team B-6 B-8. Standardization Agreements B-9 APPENDIX C. UNITED STATES FORCES KOREA C-l. Introduction C-l C-2. Command Relationships C-l C-3. Organization C-l C-4. Communications C-4 C-5. Combined Operations C-5 APPENDIX D. UNITED STATES SOUTHERN COMMAND D-l. Introduction D-l D-2. Command Relationships D-3 D-3. Organization D-3 D-4. Communications D-4 APPENDIX E. ROAD MOVEMENT PLANNING Section I. GRAPHING E-l. Introduction E-l E-2. Preparing a Graph E-l E-3. Planning for Route Restrictions E-3 E-4. Publishing Road Movement Tables E-4 Section H. DECONFLICTING E-5. Introduction E-5 E-6. Critical Time and Point Graph E-5 Section HI. GRAPHING, DECONFLICTING, AND PREPARING MOVEMENT TABLES FOR A HIGHWAY MOVEMENT E-7. Introduction E-7 E-8. Reviewing the Situation E-7 E-9. Computing Time Distance of the Route E-8 E-10. Computing Road Space of the First Serial E-8 E-ll. Computing Pass Time of the First Serial E-8 E-12. Computing Road Space and Pass Time of the Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth Serials . E-8 E-13. Preparing a Road Movement Graph E-9 E-14. Graphing the First Serial E-10 E-15. Graphing the Second Serial E-10 E-16. Graphing the Third Serial . E-10 E-17. Graphing the Fourth Serial E-10 E-18. Graphing the Fifth Serial E-ll E-19. Using a Road Movement Table E-ll APPENDIX F. TRANSPORTATION MOVEMENT RELEASE AND COMMITMENT WORK SHEET F-l. Introduction F-l F-2. TMR Number F-l F-3. Codes F-2 F-4. Commitment Work Sheet F-3 v FM 55-10 Page GLOSSARY . Glossary-1 REFERENCES References-1 INDEX . Index-1 FM 55-10 PREFACE This publication describes movement control processes and procedures at the strategic, operational, and tactical levels of war. It integrates movement control with mode and terminal operations to describe how movement control activities support reception and onward movement, theater distribution systems, intermodal operations, and contingency operations. The focus is planning the use of available modes of transport to move units, equipment, and supplies through sea and aerial ports of debarkation to their final destination. It also describes transportation request procedures and how transportation resources are managed and controlled. It is a guide for commanders, staffs, and transportation movements control personnel at division, corps, and echelons above corps.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The United States Atomic Army, 1956-1960 Dissertation
    INTIMIDATING THE WORLD: THE UNITED STATES ATOMIC ARMY, 1956-1960 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Paul C. Jussel, B.A., M.M.A.S., M.S.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee Approved by Professor Allan R. Millett, Advisor Professor John R. Guilmartin __________________ Professor William R. Childs Advisor Department of History ABSTRACT The atomic bomb created a new military dynamic for the world in 1945. The bomb, if used properly, could replace the artillery fires and air-delivered bombs used to defeat the concentrated force of an enemy. The weapon provided the U.S. with an unparalleled advantage over the rest of the world, until the Soviet Union developed its own bomb by 1949 and symmetry in warfare returned. Soon, theories of warfare changed to reflect the belief that the best way to avoid the effects of the bomb was through dispersion of forces. Eventually, the American Army reorganized its divisions from the traditional three-unit organization to a new five-unit organization, dubbed pentomic by its Chief of Staff, General Maxwell D. Taylor. While atomic weapons certainly had an effect on Taylor’s reasoning to adopt the pentomic organization, the idea was not new in 1956; the Army hierarchy had been wrestling with restructuring since the end of World War II. Though the Korean War derailed the Army’s plans for the early fifties, it returned to the forefront under the Eisenhower Administration. The driving force behind reorganization in 1952 was not ii only the reoriented and reduced defense budget, but also the Army’s inroads to the atomic club, formerly the domain of only the Air Force and the Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • Oshkosh Corporation
    CHARLES L. SZEWS WILSON R. JONES Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer (through 12/31/15) (effective 01/01/16) LEADING THE MARKET Oshkosh Corporation is a leading designer, manufacturer and marketer of a broad range of access equipment, specialty military, fire & emergency and commercial vehicles and vehicle bodies. Oshkosh’s products are valued worldwide by rental companies, defense forces, concrete placement and refuse businesses, fire & emergency departments and municipal and airport services, where high quality, superior performance, rugged reliability and long-term value are paramount. Oshkosh Corporation partners with customers to deliver superior solutions that safely and efficiently move people and materials at work, around the globe and around the clock. In short, we are Moving the World at Work. Our top priorities are to serve and delight our customers as well as drive superior operating performance to benefit our shareholders. We do this while leveraging our strengths and resources in engineering, manufacturing, purchasing and distribution across our four business segments. Founded in 1917, Oshkosh Corporation has manufacturing operations in eight U.S. states and in Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, France, Mexico, Romania and the United Kingdom. The company currently employs approximately 13,000 people worldwide. OSHKOSH CORPORATION 2015 FORM 10-K UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission file number: 1-31371 Oshkosh Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Wisconsin 39-0520270 (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S.
    [Show full text]
  • About This Template
    Oshkosh Corporation Investor Presentation March 2021 Forward-looking statements This presentation contains statements that the Company believes to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including, without limitation, statements regarding the Company’s future financial position, business strategy, targets, projected sales, costs, earnings, capital expenditures, debt levels and cash flows, and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. When used in this presentation, words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “should,” “project” or “plan” or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors include the overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition; the duration and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic; actions that may be taken by governmental authorities and others to address or otherwise mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic; the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on global economies and the Company’s customers, suppliers and employees; the cyclical nature of the Company’s access equipment, commercial and fire & emergency markets, which are particularly impacted by the strength of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Just Another Truck?
    JUST ANOTHER TRUCK? A Monograph by Major Daniel V. Sulka Transportation Corps School of Advanced Military Studies United States Army Command and General Staff College Fort Leavenworth, Kansas Fit Term AY 91-92 SWOL OF ADVANCED MILITARY STUDIES MONCGRAPH APPROVAL Student: Major Daniel V. Sulka. US Army Title of Monograph: The Palletized Load System.... Just Another Truck? Approve by: Monograph Director Director, School of es R. McDonough, Advanced Military Studies Director, Graduate Philip J. Brookes, PHD Degree Program Accepted this &fP day of -&Zfdk-, 1991 ABSTRACT THE PALLETIZED LOAD SYSTEM.. .. JUST ANOTHER TRUCK? by Major Daniel V. Sulka, USA, 61 pages. This monograph examines the Palletized Load System to determine if it will effectively support the transportation requirements of current and evolving doctrine. The PLS, a self loading and unloading truck and trailer system, will be fielded in the near future. This technology represents a significant investment in addressing shortfalls in ammuni- tion distribution under the Maneuver Oriented Ammunition Distribution System (MOADS). To assess the impact of the Palletized Load System on logisticians' ability to support AirLand Battle doctrine and and the evolving AirLand Operations doctrine, the monograph first traces historical and theoretical influences on the system. These include the evolution of truck technology, the impact of mechanized transport and mobility on doctrine, and the development of unit load devices and containerization. The monograph briefly addresses current transportation chal- lenges, the design of the Palletized Load System, and its planned use. The monograph concludes that the Palletized Load Sys- tem is a natural confluence of the evolution of transporta- tion technologies and the demands of highly mobile forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Combat Support and Combat Service Support
    COMBAT SUPPORT AND COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT Under the Program Executive Office for Combat Support & Combat Service Support (PEO CS&CSS), project man- agers, together with their reporting prod- uct managers and product directors, are responsible for Army systems and some joint service programs across all phases of their life cycle. Program phases fall into the areas of: pre-systems acquisition (concept refine- ment or technology development), gener- ally consisting of research and develop- 350 ARMY I October 2010 ment programs and prior to a Milestone B; systems acquisition (between Milestone B and full materiel release); systems after full materiel release (in production and fielding phases); and two types of sustain- ment (operations and support): systems Logistics support that have completed fielding, are no longer vessel (LSV) in production and are managed directly by the project manager and systems that have completed fielding, are no longer in pro- duction and are managed by an Army Ma- teriel Command commodity command, but for which the PM is the life-cycle man- ager. PEO CS&CSS Project Managers include: Project Manager Force Projection, Project Manager Joint Combat Support Systems, Project Manager Tactical Vehicles and Pro- ject Manager Mine Resistant Ambush Pro- tected Vehicles. A representative sampling Army,” the Product Director for Army combat vehicles and sustainment cargo. of their programs follows. Watercraft Systems (PD AWS) is working The 313-foot LSV class vessel, designed to to provide “a flexible and responsive fleet, carry more than 2,000 tons of deck cargo, Project Manager Force Projection projecting and sustaining America’s forces has a beam of 60 feet and a molded depth The Project Manager Force Projection through the 21st century.” PD AWS is re- of 19 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisition of the Palletized Load System
    OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL" ACQUISITION OF THE PALLETIZED LOAD SYSTEM Report Number 92-003 October 9, 1991 Department of Defense INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 400 ARMY NAVY DRIVE ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22202-2884 October 9, 1991 MEMORANDUM FOR ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT) SUBJECT: Audit Report on the Acquisition of the Palletized Load System (Report No. 92-003) We are providing this final report for your information and use. Comments on a draft of this report were considered in preparing the final report. We performed the audit from September 1989 through January 1991 as part of our continuing review of major acquisition programs. The Army had not accurately quantified the acquisition requirements for the PLS program and had not determined the cost­ effectiveness of all planned uses of the PLS. As a result, the acquisition requirements for the PLS were misstated by about $653.8 million. Also, the Army could unnecessarily spend at least $279.8 million by using the PLS to support Multiple Launch Rocket System units. DoD Directive 7650.3 requires that all audit recommendations be resolved promptly. Therefore, the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Financial Management) must provide final comments on the unresolved recommendations by December 9, 1991. The courtesies extended to the audit staff are appreciated. If you have any questions on this audit, please contact Mr. Rayburn H. Stricklin at (703) 614-3965 (DSN 224-3965) or Mr. Verne F. Petz at (703) 693-0388 (DSN 223-0388). Copies of this report are being provided to the activities listed in Appendix H.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 the EARLY MODERN BRIGADE, 1958-1972 Pentomic
    Chapter 6 THE EARLY MODERN BRIGADE, 1958-1972 Pentomic Era Following World War II, the US Army retained the organizational structures, with minor modifications, which had won that war. This organization—which did not include a maneuver unit called the brigade after the two brigades in the 1st Cavalry Division were eliminated in 1949—was also used to fight the Korean War in 1950-1953. Despite the success of the triangular infantry division in two wars, the Army radically changed the structure in 1958 by converting the infantry division to what became known as the Pentomic Division. Ostensively, the Pentomic structure was designed to allow infantry units to survive and fight on an atomic battlefield. Structurally it eliminated the regiment and battalion, replacing both with five self- contained “battlegroups,” each of which were larger than an old style battalion, but smaller than a regiment. A full colonel commanded the battlegroup and his captains commanded four, later five, subordinate rifle companies. The Pentomic Division structurally reflected that of the World War II European theater airborne divisions. This was no surprise since three European airborne commanders dominated the Army’s strategic thinking after the Korean War: Army Chief of Staff General Matthew Ridgway, Eighth Army commander General Maxwell Taylor, and VII Corps commander Lieutenant General James Gavin. Though theoretically triangular in design, the two airborne divisions Ridgway, Taylor, and Gavin commanded in the war, the 82d and 101st, fought as division task forces reinforced with additional parachute regiments and separate battalions. For most of the Northern European campaign, both divisions had two additional parachute regiments attached to them, giving them five subordinate regiments, each commanded by colonels.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-06-160 Defense Logistics: Several Factors Limited The
    United States Government Accountability Office GAO Report to Congressional Committees March 2006 DEFENSE LOGISTICS Several Factors Limited the Production and Installation of Army Truck Armor during Current Wartime Operations a GAO-06-160 March 2006 DEFENSE LOGISTICS Accountability Integrity Reliability Highlights Several Factors Limited the Production Highlights of GAO-06-160, a report to and Installation of Army Truck Armor congressional committees during Current Wartime Operations Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found In April 2005, GAO reported on The Army expects to have met its current requirements for the production factors affecting the timely and installation of truck armor by the end of January 2006 except for fuel production of up-armored high- tankers. Completion of armor kit installation for tankers is expected by mobility multi-purpose wheeled January 2007. Although the Army first identified a requirement for 3,780 vehicles (HMMWV) and add-on truck armor kits for five types of trucks in November 2003, it did not armor kits for HMMWVs, as well as other items critically needed by produce all of the kits until February 2005 and did not install the kits to fully deployed forces during Operation meet the requirement until May 2005 – 18 months after the initial Iraqi Freedom. Due to high interest requirement was identified. However, by that time, requirements had by Congress and the public increased substantially. As subsequent requirements for an additional 7,847 regarding vehicle armor, GAO kits, excluding tankers, were identified, the time lag to meet them lessened. initiated this subsequent engagement to examine issues Time to Meet Initial Truck Armor Requirements by Truck Type affecting the production and Date required Date required Total months to installation of armor for medium Initial November quantities quantities fully meet initial and heavy trucks.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Ausa Annual Meeting & Exposition
    PROGRAM 2017 AUSA ANNUAL MEETING & EXPOSITION A Professional Development Forum 9-11 OCTOBER 2017 Walter E. Washington Convention Center Washington, DC BUILDING READINESS America’s Army from the Great War to Multi-Domain Battle THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSORS The Association of the United States Army would like to thank the following sponsors for their generous support during the 2017 Annual Meeting. HHHTHREE STAR SPONSORS HHTWO STAR SPONSORS H ONE STAR SPONSORS ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY salutes the United States Army in its 242nd Year of Service to the Nation Welcome! The Association of the United States Army (AUSA) welcomes you to the 63rd AUSA Annual Meeting & Exposition, the largest land power exposition and professional development forum in North America. The Meeting will take place 9-11 October 2017 at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in Washington, D.C. AUSA is a member-based, nonprofit professional organization proudly serving America’s Army and its supporters. If you have a connection with the Army—professionally or personally—AUSA is your resource for Soldier and family programs, educational resources, business opportunities, and more. Join us today at www.ausa.org/join. Location The 2017 AUSA Annual Meeting & Exposition is conveniently located in the heart of Washington, D.C. at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center, 801 Mt. Vernon Pl NW, Washington, D.C. 20001. The facility is metro accessible and offers 3000+ parking spots within a three-block radius. Security AUSA has added certain security measures that affect access to and movement within the Walter E. Washington Convention Center.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHICAL DATA BOO KK Class 2019-4 15
    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Class 2019-4 15 Jul - 16 Aug 2019 National Defense University NDU PRESIDENT Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge, USN 16th President Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge is an honors graduate of the University of Minnesota with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering and was commissioned through the Reserve Officers' Training Corps program. He earned a Master of Science in Engineering Management from the Catholic University of America and a Master of Arts with highest distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies from the Naval War College. He was a fellow of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Seminar XXI program. VADM Fritz Roegge, NDU President (Photo His sea tours include USS Whale (SSN 638), USS by NDU AV) Florida (SSBN 728) (Blue), USS Key West (SSN 722) and command of USS Connecticut (SSN 22). His major command tour was as commodore of Submarine Squadron 22 with additional duty as commanding officer, Naval Support Activity La Maddalena, Italy. Ashore, he has served on the staffs of both the Atlantic and the Pacific Submarine Force commanders, on the staff of the director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion, on the Navy staff in the Assessments Division (N81) and the Military Personnel Plans and Policy Division (N13), in the Secretary of the Navy's Office of Legislative Affairs at the U. S, House of Representatives, as the head of the Submarine and Nuclear Power Distribution Division (PERS 42) at the Navy Personnel Command, and as an assistant deputy director on the Joint Staff in both the Strategy and Policy (J5) and the Regional Operations (J33) Directorates.
    [Show full text]
  • Main Command Post-Operational Detachments
    C O R P O R A T I O N Main Command Post- Operational Detachments (MCP-ODs) and Division Headquarters Readiness Stephen Dalzell, Christopher M. Schnaubelt, Michael E. Linick, Timothy R. Gulden, Lisa Pelled Colabella, Susan G. Straus, James Sladden, Rebecca Jensen, Matthew Olson, Amy Grace Donohue, Jaime L. Hastings, Hilary A. Reininger, Penelope Speed For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2615 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0225-7 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents research and analysis conducted as part of a project entitled Multi- Component Units and Division Headquarters Readiness sponsored by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • About This Template
    Oshkosh Corporation Investor Presentation September 2020 Forward-looking statements This presentation contains statements that the Company believes to be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including, without limitation, statements regarding the Company’s future financial position, business strategy, targets, projected sales, costs, earnings, capital expenditures, debt levels and cash flows, and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. When used in this presentation, words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “should,” “project” or “plan” or the negative thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors include the overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition; the duration and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic; actions that may be taken by governmental authorities and others to address or otherwise mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic; the potential negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on global economies and the Company’s customers, suppliers and employees; the cyclical nature of the Company’s access equipment, commercial and fire & emergency markets, which are particularly impacted by the strength of U.S.
    [Show full text]