Emeljanov Golub 2001 Testes.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Emeljanov Golub 2001 Testes.Pdf SHTOMOJIOrHHECKOE OBO3PEHHE, LXXX, 3, 2001 VflK 595.732.2 + 595.751.2/3 :S91 .463.2 + 591.465.31 © A. <&. EMejibHHOB, H. B. Tojiy6 H B. F. KyaneijoBa OBOJIIOI^HOHHtlE IIPEOEPA3OBAHHH CTPyKTyPM CEMEHHHKOB H HHHHHKOB V CEHOEflQB, IiyXOEAOB H BHIEft (PSOCOPTERA, PHTHIRAPTERA: MALLOPHAGA, ANOPLURA) {A. F. EMELJANOV, N- V. GOLUB a. V. G. KUZNETSOVA. EVOLUTIONARY TRANSFORMATIONS OF TESTES AND OVARIES STRUCTURE IN BARKLICE AND LICE (PSOCOPTERA, PHTHIRAPTERA: MALLOPHAGA, ANOPLURA)] B paSoTe B nepsyio o^iepeflb paccMaxpHBaeTCfl Bonpoc 06 HHn,eBbix Tpy6o^eK H ceiwteHHbix ^ojuinKyjioB, fljia ceMeHHHKOB paccMa-r- pusaeTca TaKJKe ssaiiMHoe pacnojioaceHHe 4>oJiJiHKyjioB na ceMHnposofle. TOH- K1I6 OCoSeHHOCTH CTpOeHHH H (JjyHKILTlOHHpOBaHHfl HH^HHKOB, CeMeHHHKOB H HX HacTeH He paccMaTpHBaroTCfl, TaK KUK TaKHe ^annhie if.e HSBBCTHBI HJIH H6 IISBeCTHbl H HeflOCTaTO^HLI flJIH 3BOjriOrtHOHHbIX nOCTpO6HHH. Hbie o "^HCJie H xapaKTepe pacnojiojKeHHfl <$QJuna.KyjioB y cenoefloB HS jiHTepaTypbi (Nitzsch, 1882; Badonnel, 1934; Jentsch, 1939; Finla- yson, 1949; KHer, 1951; Wong, Thornton, 1968; BuniHHKOBa, 1970) H BToptiM asTopoM B peoyjibTHTe co6cTseHHtix HccjieflosaHHH. o ^iHCJie H pacnoJioHceniiH E^ojunmyjioB y Mallophaga ^anbi o5pa30M no Bjiarosen^eHCKOMy (1956), y Haematomyzida — no H Cen-CapMe (Mukerji, Sen-Sarma, 1955), y Anoplura — no BjiaroserqeHCKOMy (I960), IlaBJioBCKOMy (1907, 1922, 1923), Oeppucy (Fer- ris, 1951). HcnojibsosaHbi TaKJKe npenapaiti, nsroTOBJieHHbie noKoiinbiM fl. H. Bjiarosen^eHCKHM, xpanjiu^HecH B SoonorH^iecKOM HHCTHTyTe PAH B CaHKT-rieTep6ypre (CM. TaSji. IH 2). OCHOBOH paccyjKfleHHii o HanpaBJieHnax Mop^ojiorHHecKOH 3BOJiK)itHH cc- cjiyjKHT ^HJioreHeTH^ecKan cxeiaa CMHoepca (Sniithers, 1972) (puc. 1), TaKJKe, no KpairaeH Mepe B OTHomeHHH nopaflKa rjiasHbix ii, BHUIHHKOBOH (1980) H Hbio (New, 1987). Hiii;eBbie TpySo^KH. Bap JiaD;nH no JIOBOH cucreMbi CBMOK cenoe^os B OTHomeHHH ^iHCJia osapHoji HesejiHKH H HocflT xapaKTep npocToii ojinroMe- pHsaitHH HJIH/H no^HMepii3an;iiH. IIo-BHflHMOMy, npeoSjiaflaeT npoixeec ojmro- Mepnsan.HH, Hflyn^nii napaJTJiejibHO BO MHOFHX seTBax cqnTajon^erocs Han6ojiee npoflBHHyTbiM no^oTps^a Psocomorpha. Bo scex Tpex noflOTps^ax cenoeflos BCTpe^iaioTCfl 5 osapnoji, 3TO HBjiaeTcii e^HHCTBeHHbiM RJIX DpeacTasHTejieH: no^oTpHflOB Trogiomorpha Troctomorpha, a TaK^ce ^JIH scex Phthiraptera. y Psocomorpha axo nojiowcHTejibHO ncxoflHoe MHCJIO coxpanHeTca y 28 BH^OB (us 76 18 po#oB (HO 32 HsyqeHHBix) H 12 ceMeiicTB (H3 22 HsynenHbix). B 3Bojnon;HH Psocomorpha OHO nocjiefloeaTejibHo coKpauj;aeTCfl AO 4 H 3. HHCJIO 4 y HHX (41 siifl, 21 po^, 11 ceMeficTB). HHCJIO 3 BCTpe^aeTCH 557 T a 6 Ji H n. a 1 ciicTHMa nyxoe^os {Mallophaga) MHCJIO ^WJiJiHJtyiiDB; 4n<yio .aojieii CCMCH- B« CUBH'tBC (s) HHCJIO osapnoji HOro uyaKrpbKa miH Ha cTe6ejii.Kax (p) IToftOTpnA AMBLYCERA COM. MENOPONIDAE IToAceM. Mcnoponinae Mcnupon gallinae (L.) 3, s? 6 5 Amyrsidea latifasciata (Pg.) 3, p 4 5 A.perdicis (D.) 3, p? 4 ? A.striala (Kell.) 3, p? 4 ? Holomenopon nyrocac (Blag.) 3, ? 4 5 Nosopnn rotundifmns (Blag,) ? 2 ? Au.it romcnopon crocatum (N.) 3, s 4 5 A- meyeri (Gb.) 3, s? 4 5 A* lutesccns (N.) 3, s? 4 5 Fidmanniela brevipalpe (Pg.) 3, s? 4 ? Plegadiphilus plegadis (Dub.) 3, s? 2 ? IIoflceM. Pseudomenoponinae Pseudomenopon tridcns (N.) 3, p 4 5 IIoflceM. Menacanthinae Menacant hus cornutus (Schom.) 3, p 4 5 M.fertilis (N.) 3, p? 4 5 M. ? alaudae (Schr.) 3, p? 4 7 M. cornicis Blag. 3, P? 4 ? Af, mutabilis Blag. 3, p? 4 ? M . an.nula.tus (Gb.) 3, p? 4 ? M.orioli Blag, 3, p? 4 ? M.coarctatus (Scop.) 3, P? 4 9 • M.pusillus (N.) 2, ? 4 ? M. gonophaeus gonophae.us (N.) 3, p? 4 ? M. ^. jnoncdulac Blag, 3, p? 4 5 Men.acan.thus sp. 3, p? 4 5 Uchida pallidulus (Neum.) 3,p? 4 5 Some nacan thus stramincus (N.) 3, P 6 5 IToAceM. Colpocephalinae Colpaccphalum flauiscens N. 3, p 4 5 C.subacquale N. 8,p? 4 ? C. decimfasciatum Boisd. 3, p? 4 5 C. zeftra N. 3, p? 4 ? C. inaequale N. 3, p? 4 ? N eocolpocepkalum bicinctum (N.) 3, p? 4 5 M tricinctum (N.) 3, p? 4 5 yV. blagoweschenskii (Dub.) 3, p? 4 ? Anseriphilus pectiniventre paruum 3, p? 4 ? (Blag.) Kurodaia longipes (Gb.) 3, p 4 ? 558 Ta6jiHna 1 Hncflo ({xj^ijinKyjiOB; HHCJIO flOJIBH CEMBH- BOA CHfiSHMe (s) MHCJIO oaapiiOJi nrai ii a creGentKax (p) HOro nyabtpbKa TTojuceM. Colpocephalinae Actor nithophilus ? affinis (N.) 3, ? 4 ? A. ochraceiis ochraceus (N.) 3, ? 4 ? Ao. himantopi Biag. 3, ? 4 ? A.uniseriatiLs (Pg.) 3, ? 4 ? A. patellatus (Pg.) 3, ? 4 ? A.spinulosus (Pg.) 3, ? 4 5 Hclconomus truncatus (Pg.) 3, ? 4 ? CuculiphiluK fasciatus (Scop.) 3, ? 4 5 Meromenopon meropis C. et M. ? 4 5 HoflceM. Dennyinae Takarnatsuia major Ucli. 3, s 2 7 Myrsidea subaequalis (Lyonet) 2, ? 4 5 M. isostoma (N.) • ? ? 5 M.cucuilaris (N.) ? 4 5 M.anathorax (N.) ? 4 7 TIoAceM. Trinotoninae Trinoton que.rquedulae (L.) 3, s 4 5 T.anscriniim (Fabr.) 3, s? 4 ? Piagettieta titan (Pg.) 3, s? 2 7 CeM. LAEMOBOTlIRnDAE Laemoholhrion tinnunculi L. 3, p? 4 7 JS.circi (Geoff.) 3.p 4 5 Eulaemobothrion nismm. (Burtn.) 3, p 4 5 CeM. RICINIDAE Ricinus nlttdissimus (N.) ? 7 5 R. tugarinovi Blag. ? ? 5 R.frenatus (N.) 9 ? 5 7?. scrratus (Dur.) 3, ? 4 5 Cew. GYROPIDAE IIoaceM. Gyropinae Gyrapus oualis N. 3, s 2 5 IIoflceM. Gliricolinae Gliricota porcetli (L.) 3, s 4 5 IIoflOTp«A I S C H N O C E R A CGM. PinLOPTERIDAE TloAceM. Philoptcrinac Philopterus semisignatus N. 2, P 4 5 Ph.occllatus N. 2, P 4 5 559 HDCJIO (JjojirniKyjios; MUCJIO ^ojien ceueH- Bafl CHflJIi«IC (S) HHCJIO osapiioji BOro nyatipMta tutu us creBejiiKax (p) IIoAOTpiiA ISCHNOCERA CeM. PHILOPTERJDAE IIo^ceM. Philopterinae Philopterus corui (L.) 2, P 4 5 Ph.picae D. 2, P 4 1 Ph.guttatus N. 2, p? 4 5 Ph.thryptoccphalus Kell. et P. 2,p? 4 9 Ph. ornatus N. 2, P 4 ? Ph.cincli D. 2, p 4 9 Ccpseloecus excisus (N.) 2, P 4 ? Docaphorulus subflauescens (Geoff.) 2, P 4 5 D. fulginosus1 2* ? 5 Sturnidoecus sturni (Schr.) 2, s 2 5 S. ruficeps (N.) 2, s 2 5 Anatoecus dentatus (Scrop.) 2, s 4 5 Penenirmus paulovskyi paulovskyi 2, s 2 ? Blag. P.albiuentris (Scop.) 2, s 2 j P.gulosa(N.) 2, s 2 ? P. heteroscelts {N.) 2, s 2 9 P.auritus (Scop.) 2, s 2 ? P. nirmuides (N.) 2, s 2 ? P.gcntilis Blag. 2, s 2 ? Meropaecus me.ropis (D.) 2, s 4 ? Cucutoecus iatifrofis (N.) 2, s 4 ? Ibidoecus bisignatus (N.) 2, s 4 5 Lplattileae (D.) 2,s 4 5 Saemundssonia lobaticeps (Gb.) 2, s 4 1 S. melanocephalus Burm. 2, s 4 ? S. gonotlwrax (Gb.) 2, s 4 ? S.fratercvlac Ov. 2, s 4 ? S.celidoxa (N.) 2, s 4 ? S. cvrdiceps (Gb.) 2, s 4 ? S.limosae (D.) 2,5 4 5 S. temporalis (Gb.) 2, s 4 ? S.naumanni (Gb.) 2, s 4 ? S.ellipttca (N.) 2, s 4 ? Incidifrons pertusus pertusus (N.) 2, s 4 5 Cummingsiella testudinaria (D.) 2, s 4 7 C.breuiclypeata Blag. 2, s 4 ? C.spathulatus (Gb.) 2, s 4 ? C. macrocephalus (N.) 2, s 4 5 C.platystontus (N.) 2, s 4 ? C. nacuius (Gb.) 2, s 4 ? Aegypoecus neophron C. et M. 2, s 4 5 Strigiphilus cursor (N.) 2,3 4 ? Eurimetopus taurus 2** ? 5 560 Ta6jiima 1 HIICJIO (JiojiJiHKyjioB; ''lucjio jjojieii CCMRH- cnflKine (s) HHCJIO OBapHOJi Ban iioro nya&iptKa mm iia ere 5 cjii.it ax (p) rio^ccM. Degeeriellinae Degecrietla discocaphala dixcocc- 2, 5 4 5 phala (N.) Kcle.rinirm.its fuscus (N.) 2, s 4 5 K.rufius (N.) 2, S 4 9 Capraiella suhcuspidata (N.) 2, s 4 5 Upupicola upupae (D.) 2, s 4 5 Brueiia urgula (N.) 2, s 2 ? B. uncinosa (N.) 2, s 2 5 B. Darin {N.) 2, s 2 1 B.bioccllata (Pg.) 2, s 2 ? B.biguttata (Kell. et P.) 2, s 2 ? B.;imo (Gb.) ? ? 5 £. nebulosa (Burm.) 2, s 2 ? B.paruiguttata (Blag.) . 2, s 2 7 B.marginalis (N.) 2, s 2 ? Mcropsiella apiustri (D.) 2, s 2 ? Ca.rduicp.ps zonarius (N.) 2, s 2 ? C.smtaris(Pg.) 2, s 2 5 C. terckiae (Blag.) 2, s 2 ? C. cingulatus (N.) 2, s 2 5 Lunaceps holophacus (N.) 2, s 4 ? L. numenii (D.) 2, s 4 7 L.proxiniLis (Blag.) 2, s 4 ? A^uonirmiis podicepis (D.) 2, s 4 7 Quadracc.ps ochropi (D.) 2, s 4 5 Q.furvus (N.) 2, s 4 7 Q. conformis (Blag.) 2, s 4 ? Q.dissimilis (Blag.) 2, s 4 ? Q.obscurus (N.) 2, s 4 5 Q.junceus (D.) 2, s 4 9 Q.perinsignis (Blag.) 2, s 4 5 Q.infectus connexus (Cell, et M.) 2, s 4 7 Q. /issus (N.) 2, s 4 7 Q.hernichrous (N.) 2, s 4 9 Q.punctoius (N.) 2, s 4 5 Q. ornafus (Gr.) 2, s 4 ? Q. sellatus (Brum.) 2, s 4 ? Q.caspius (Gb.) 2, s 4 9 Q.phaeonotus (N.) 2, s 4 ? Q. normifer (Gr.) 2, s 4 ? Mjoberginirmus obliquus (Mjob.) 2, s 4 7 Lagopoecus pailidouittatus (Gr.) 2, s 4 ? L.Ly runts Cl. 2, s 4 ? L.af finis (Child.) 2, s 4 7 Syrrhaphtoecus alchatae (Rud.) 2, s 2 ? Rallicola fulicae (D.) 2, s 2 5 R.cuspidata (Scop.) ? 2 ? 561 Ta6jiHu;a 1 'Incjio iJiojurrfKyjiOB; HUCJID jiojieii ccMen- Bus cuAfl'uie (s) MJICJIO OBQpnojr HOFO nyaupLKa IT JUT na cTeoe.ni.Kax (p) IToflceM. Lipeurinae Lipcurus caponis (L.) 2, s 2 ? L. lawrensis tropiculis Peters** 2, s 2 5 Falcolipeurus frater (Gb.) 2, s 2 ? F . perspicillatus (N.) 2, s . 2 ? F.quadrioculatus (N.) 2, s 2 ? Culotogaster hetcragrapfius (N.) 2, s 2 5 C. tetraogallus (Cl.) 2.
Recommended publications
  • Infestation by Haematopinus Quadripertusus on Cattle in São
    Research Note Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet., Jaboticabal, v. 21, n. 3, p. 315-318, jul.-set. 2012 ISSN 0103-846X (impresso) / ISSN 1984-2961 (eletrônico) Infestation by Haematopinus quadripertusus on cattle in São Domingos do Capim, state of Pará, Brazil Infestação por Haematopinus quadripertusus em bovinos de São Domingos do Capim, estado do Pará, Brasil Alessandra Scofield1*; Karinny Ferreira Campos2; Aryane Maximina Melo da Silva3; Cairo Henrique Sousa Oliveira4; José Diomedes Barbosa3; Gustavo Góes-Cavalcante1 1Laboratório de Parasitologia Animal, Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde Animal na Amazônia, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Pará – UFPA, Castanhal, PA, Brasil 2Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência Animal, Universidade Federal do Pará – UFPA, Belém, PA, Brasil 3Programa de Pós-graduação em Saúde Animal na Amazônia, Universidade Federal do Pará – UFPA, Castanhal, PA, Brasil 4Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência Animal, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais – UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil Received September 15, 2011 Accepted March 20, 2012 Abstract Severe infestation with lice was observed on crossbred cattle (Bos taurus indicus × Bos taurus taurus) in the municipality of São Domingos do Capim, state of Pará, Brazil. Sixty-five animals were inspected and the lice were manually collected, preserved in 70% alcohol and taken to the Animal Parasitology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Pará, Brazil, for identification. The adult lice were identified Haematopinusas quadripertusus, and all the cattle examined were infested by at least one development stage of this ectoparasite. The specimens collected were located only on the tail in 80% (52/65) of the cattle, while they were around the eyes as well as on the ears and tail in 20% (13/65).
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    -- 1~ OEC 19 95 ANNUAL REPORT A U S T R A L I A N M l l S E U M s ,. d n c .' A s 11 ISSN 1039- IJl41 - ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS 4 Introduction and Highlights s Mission 7 Premier's Message 9 President's Message 11 Director's Message 1 3 Public Programs and Marketing 17 Science in the Museum 2 9 Commercial Activities 31 Administration 34 Financial Statements Appendices 47 Trust 48 Management Structure 51 Staff 55 Publications 63 Sponsors 64 Index 3 INTRODUCT ION AND H IGHLI G HTS The Australian Museum finds itse lf in the fortunate position of being located in the city of Sydney, host of HIGHLI GHTS OF THE Y EAR IN CL UDE: the Olympic Games in the ye ar 2000. Our plan s are influenced by the goal of full participation in the Games • 'Rediscovering Pompeii' exhibition received over lead -up program. the Cultural Olympiad. Sydney can 15o,ooo visitors; ga in from the creativity and expertise which Museum staff offer in both exhibition developm ent and • 'Search & Discover' resource centre In its first six environmental management. These are the two distinct, months, received 35,000 visitors an d over 4,000 yet interacting sides : the public face of the Museum and telephone enquiries; the expertise which lies behind the scenes. Over the years. ma ny changes have occurred in the Museum, just • Outreach Programs reached over 550,ooo people in as concepts of science. nature and humanity have regional centres and schools; changed and tech nological adva nce s have been forged.
    [Show full text]
  • BÖCEKLERİN SINIFLANDIRILMASI (Takım Düzeyinde)
    BÖCEKLERİN SINIFLANDIRILMASI (TAKIM DÜZEYİNDE) GÖKHAN AYDIN 2016 Editör : Gökhan AYDIN Dizgi : Ziya ÖNCÜ ISBN : 978-605-87432-3-6 Böceklerin Sınıflandırılması isimli eğitim amaçlı hazırlanan bilgisayar programı için lütfen aşağıda verilen linki tıklayarak programı ücretsiz olarak bilgisayarınıza yükleyin. http://atabeymyo.sdu.edu.tr/assets/uploads/sites/76/files/siniflama-05102016.exe Eğitim Amaçlı Bilgisayar Programı ISBN: 978-605-87432-2-9 İçindekiler İçindekiler i Önsöz vi 1. Protura - Coneheads 1 1.1 Özellikleri 1 1.2 Ekonomik Önemi 2 1.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 2 2. Collembola - Springtails 3 2.1 Özellikleri 3 2.2 Ekonomik Önemi 4 2.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 4 3. Thysanura - Silverfish 6 3.1 Özellikleri 6 3.2 Ekonomik Önemi 7 3.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 7 4. Microcoryphia - Bristletails 8 4.1 Özellikleri 8 4.2 Ekonomik Önemi 9 5. Diplura 10 5.1 Özellikleri 10 5.2 Ekonomik Önemi 10 5.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 11 6. Plocoptera – Stoneflies 12 6.1 Özellikleri 12 6.2 Ekonomik Önemi 12 6.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 13 7. Embioptera - webspinners 14 7.1 Özellikleri 15 7.2 Ekonomik Önemi 15 7.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 15 8. Orthoptera–Grasshoppers, Crickets 16 8.1 Özellikleri 16 8.2 Ekonomik Önemi 16 8.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 17 i 9. Phasmida - Walkingsticks 20 9.1 Özellikleri 20 9.2 Ekonomik Önemi 21 9.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 21 10. Dermaptera - Earwigs 23 10.1 Özellikleri 23 10.2 Ekonomik Önemi 24 10.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 24 11. Zoraptera 25 11.1 Özellikleri 25 11.2 Ekonomik Önemi 25 11.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 26 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Parasitology in Australia: Past, Present and Future
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Journal of Zoology, 2018, 66, 286–305 Review https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO19017 Wildlife parasitology in Australia: past, present and future David M. Spratt A,C and Ian Beveridge B AAustralian National Wildlife Collection, National Research Collections Australia, CSIRO, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. BVeterinary Clinical Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Werribee, Vic. 3030, Australia. CCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Wildlife parasitology is a highly diverse area of research encompassing many fields including taxonomy, ecology, pathology and epidemiology, and with participants from extremely disparate scientific fields. In addition, the organisms studied are highly dissimilar, ranging from platyhelminths, nematodes and acanthocephalans to insects, arachnids, crustaceans and protists. This review of the parasites of wildlife in Australia highlights the advances made to date, focussing on the work, interests and major findings of researchers over the years and identifies current significant gaps that exist in our understanding. The review is divided into three sections covering protist, helminth and arthropod parasites. The challenge to document the diversity of parasites in Australia continues at a traditional level but the advent of molecular methods has heightened the significance of this issue. Modern methods are providing an avenue for major advances in documenting and restructuring the phylogeny of protistan parasites in particular, while facilitating the recognition of species complexes in helminth taxa previously defined by traditional morphological methods. The life cycles, ecology and general biology of most parasites of wildlife in Australia are extremely poorly understood. While the phylogenetic origins of the Australian vertebrate fauna are complex, so too are the likely origins of their parasites, which do not necessarily mirror those of their hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying British Insects and Arachnids: an Annotated Bibliography of Key Works Edited by Peter C
    Cambridge University Press 0521632412 - Identifying British Insects and Arachnids: An Annotated Bibliography of Key Works Edited by Peter C. Barnard Index More information Index This index includes all the higher taxonomic categories mentioned in the book, from orders down to families, but page numbers are given only for the main occurrences of those names. It therefore also acts as a complete alphabetic list of the higher taxa of British insects and arachnids (except for the numerous families of mites). Acalyptratae 173, 188 Anyphaenidae 327 Acanthosomatidae 55 Aphelinidae 198, 293, 308 Acari 320, 330 Aphelocheiridae 55 Acartophthalmidae 173, 191 Aphididae 56, 62 Acerentomidae 23 Aphidoidea 56, 61 Acrididae 39 Aphrophoridae 56 Acroceridae 172, 180, 181 Apidae 198, 217 Aculeata 197, 206 Apioninae 83, 134 Adelgidae 56, 62, 64 Apocrita 197, 198, 206, 227 Adelidae 146 Apoidea 198, 214 Adephaga 82, 91 Arachnida 320 Aderidae 83, 126, 127 Aradidae 55 Aeolothripidae 52 Araneae 320, 326 Aepophilidae 55 Araneidae 327 Aeshnidae 31 Araneomorphae 327 Agelenidae 327 Archaeognatha 21, 25, 26 Agromyzidae 173, 188, 193 Arctiidae 146, 162 Alexiidae 83 Argidae 197, 201 Aleyrodidae 56, 67, 68 Argyronetidae 327 Aleyrodoidea 56, 66 Arthropleona 22 Alucitidae 146 Aschiza 173, 184 Alucitoidea 146 Asilidae 172, 180, 181, 182 Alydidae 55, 58 Asiloidea 172, 181 Amaurobiidae 327 Asilomorpha 172, 180, 182 Amblycera 48 Asteiidae 173, 189 Anisolabiidae 41 Asterolecaniidae 56, 70 Anisopodidae 172, 175, 177 Atelestidae 172, 183, 185 Anisopodoidea 172 Athericidae 172, 181 Anisoptera 31 Attelabidae 83, 134 Anobiidae 82, 119 Atypidae 327 Anoplura 48 Auchenorrhyncha 54, 55, 59 Anthicidae 83, 90, 126 Aulacidae 198, 228 Anthocoridae 55, 57, 58 Aulacigastridae 173, 192 Anthomyiidae 173, 174, 186, 187 Anthomyzidae 173, 188 Baetidae 28 Anthribidae 83, 88, 133, 134 Beraeidae 142 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521632412 - Identifying British Insects and Arachnids: An Annotated Bibliography of Key Works Edited by Peter C.
    [Show full text]
  • Hastings Slide Collection3
    HASTINGS NATURAL HISTORY RESERVATION SLIDE COLLECTION 1 ORDER FAMILY GENUS SPECIES SUBSPECIES AUTHOR DATE # SLIDES COMMENTS/CORRECTIONS Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Diamanus montanus Baker 1895 221 currently Oropsylla (Diamanus) montana Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Diamanus spp. 1 currently Oropsylla (Diamanus) spp. Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Foxella ignota acuta Stewart 1940 402 syn. of F. ignota franciscana (Roths.) Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Foxella ignota (Baker) 1895 2 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Foxella spp. 15 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Malaraeus spp. 1 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Malaraeus telchinum Rothschild 1905 491 M. telchinus Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Monopsyllus fornacis Jordan 1937 57 currently Eumolpianus fornacis Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Monopsyllus wagneri (Baker) 1904 131 currently Aetheca wagneri Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Monopsyllus wagneri ophidius Jordan 1929 2 syn. of Aetheca wagneri Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Opisodasys nesiotus Augustson 1941 2 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas sexdentatus (Baker) 1904 134 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas sexdentatus nevadensis (Jordan) 1929 15 syn. of Orchopeas agilis (Baker) Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas spp. 8 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas latens (Jordan) 1925 2 Siphonaptera Ceratophyllidae Orchopeas leucopus (Baker) 1904 2 Siphonaptera Ctenophthalmidae Anomiopsyllus falsicalifornicus C. Fox 1919 3 Siphonaptera Ctenophthalmidae Anomiopsyllus congruens Stewart 1940 96 incl. 38 Paratypes; syn. of A. falsicalifornicus Siphonaptera
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta: Psocodea: 'Psocoptera'
    Molecular systematics of the suborder Trogiomorpha (Insecta: Title Psocodea: 'Psocoptera') Author(s) Yoshizawa, Kazunori; Lienhard, Charles; Johnson, Kevin P. Citation Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 146(2): 287-299 Issue Date 2006-02 DOI Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/43134 The definitive version is available at www.blackwell- Right synergy.com Type article (author version) Additional Information File Information 2006zjls-1.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082The Lin- nean Society of London, 2006? 2006 146? •••• zoj_207.fm Original Article MOLECULAR SYSTEMATICS OF THE SUBORDER TROGIOMORPHA K. YOSHIZAWA ET AL. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 146, ••–••. With 3 figures Molecular systematics of the suborder Trogiomorpha (Insecta: Psocodea: ‘Psocoptera’) KAZUNORI YOSHIZAWA1*, CHARLES LIENHARD2 and KEVIN P. JOHNSON3 1Systematic Entomology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan 2Natural History Museum, c.p. 6434, CH-1211, Geneva 6, Switzerland 3Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820, USA Received March 2005; accepted for publication July 2005 Phylogenetic relationships among extant families in the suborder Trogiomorpha (Insecta: Psocodea: ‘Psocoptera’) 1 were inferred from partial sequences of the nuclear 18S rRNA and Histone 3 and mitochondrial 16S rRNA genes. Analyses of these data produced trees that largely supported the traditional classification; however, monophyly of the infraorder Psocathropetae (= Psyllipsocidae + Prionoglarididae) was not recovered. Instead, the family Psyllipso- cidae was recovered as the sister taxon to the infraorder Atropetae (= Lepidopsocidae + Trogiidae + Psoquillidae), and the Prionoglarididae was recovered as sister to all other families in the suborder.
    [Show full text]
  • Psocodea, “Psocoptera”, Psocidae), with One New Species
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeysA review 203: 27–46 of the(2012) genus Neopsocopsis (Psocodea, “Psocoptera”, Psocidae), with one new species... 27 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.203.3138 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A review of the genus Neopsocopsis (Psocodea, “Psocoptera”, Psocidae), with one new species from China Lu-Xi Liu1,†, Kazunori Yoshizawa2,‡, Fa-Sheng Li1,§, Zhi-Qi Liu1,| 1 Department of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China 2 Systematic Entomo- logy, Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-8589, Japan † urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:192B5D2C-88C9-41A6-95B5-C6F992B2573B ‡ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:E6937129-AF09-4073-BABF-5C025930BF31 § urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:46BA87D8-F520-4E04-B72A-87901DAFB46E | urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A642446F-B2A9-409F-A3D4-0C882890B846 Corresponding author: Zhi-Qi Liu ([email protected]) Academic editor: Vincent Smith | Received 29 March 2012 | Accepted 6 June 2012 | Published 19 June 2012 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:45CC60D2-0723-4177-A271-451D933B8D87 Citation: Liu L-X, Yoshizawa K, Li F-S, Liu Z-Q (2012) A review of the genus Neopsocopsis (Psocodea, “Psocoptera”, Psocidae), with one new species from China. ZooKeys 203: 27–46. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.203.3138 Abstract A review of species of the genus Neopsocopsis Badonnel, 1936 is presented. Four species are redescribed, viz. N. hirticornis (Reuter, 1893), N. quinquedentata (Li & Yang, 1988), N. profunda (Li, 1995), and N. flavida (Li, 1989), as well as the description of one new species, N. convexa sp. n. Seven new synonymies are proposed as follows: Pentablaste obconica Li syn.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2, Chapter 12-5: Terrestrial Insects: Hemimetabola-Notoptera
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Terrestrial Insects: Hemimetabola – Notoptera and Psocoptera. Chapter 12-5. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. 12-5-1 Volume 2. Interactions. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. eBook last updated 19 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology2/>. CHAPTER 12-5 TERRESTRIAL INSECTS: HEMIMETABOLA – NOTOPTERA AND PSOCOPTERA TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTOPTERA .................................................................................................................................................. 12-5-2 Grylloblattodea – Ice Crawlers ................................................................................................................. 12-5-3 Grylloblattidae – Ice Crawlers ........................................................................................................... 12-5-3 Galloisiana ................................................................................................................................. 12-5-3 Grylloblatta ................................................................................................................................ 12-5-3 Grylloblattella ............................................................................................................................ 12-5-4 PSOCOPTERA – Booklice, Barklice, Barkflies .............................................................................................. 12-5-4 Summary .........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta: Psocodea: Psocomorpha
    1 for submission to Insect Systematics & Diversity (ISD-2020-0035) 2 3 Systematic Position of the Enigmatic Psocid Family Lesneiidae (Insecta: 4 Psocodea: Psocomorpha), with Description of Two New Species 5 6 Kazunori Yoshizawa,1,6 Yuri M. Marusik,2,3,4 Izumi Yao,1 and Charles Lienhard 5 7 8 1 SystematiC Entomology, SChool of AgriCulture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan 9 2 Institute for BiologiCal Problems of the North RAS, Portovaya Str.18, Magadan, Russia 10 3 Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South 11 AfriCa 12 4 ZoologiCal Museum, Biodiversity Unit, University of Turku, FI-20014, Finland 13 5 Geneva Natural History Museum, CP 6434, CH-1211 Geneva 6, Switzerland 14 15 6 Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] 16 17 18 Abstract 19 The systematiC plaCement of an enigmatiC psocid family restriCted to AfriCa, Lesneiidae, 20 was estimated by using a multiple gene data set. The candidates for its close relatives are now 21 Classified under two different infraorders, the family Archipsocidae of the infraorder Archipsocetae 22 or the families Elipsocidae/Mesopsocidae of the infraorder Homilopsocidea. The maximum 23 likelihood and Bayesian analyses of the moleCular data set strongly suggested that the Lesneiidae 24 belongs to Homilopsocidea and forms a clade with Elipsocidae/Mesopsocidae/EolaChesillinae 25 (LaChesillidae). However, the relationships among these (sub)families and Lesneiidae, including the 26 monophyly of Elipsocidae and MesopsoCidae, were ambiguous or questionable, showing the 27 neCessity of further investigations for elucidating their relationships and validating the status of 28 these families.
    [Show full text]
  • Elephant Bibliography Elephant Editors
    Elephant Volume 2 | Issue 3 Article 17 12-20-1987 Elephant Bibliography Elephant Editors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/elephant Recommended Citation Shoshani, J. (Ed.). (1987). Elephant Bibliography. Elephant, 2(3), 123-143. Doi: 10.22237/elephant/1521732144 This Elephant Bibliography is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Elephant by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@WayneState. Fall 1987 ELEPHANT BIBLIOGRAPHY: 1980 - PRESENT 123 ELEPHANT BIBLIOGRAPHY With the publication of this issue we have on file references for the past 68 years, with a total of 2446 references. Because of the technical problems and lack of time, we are publishing only references for 1980-1987; the rest (1920-1987) will appear at a later date. The references listed below were retrieved from different sources: Recent Literature of Mammalogy (published by the American Society of Mammalogists), Computer Bibliographic Search Services (CCBS, the same used in previous issues), books in our office, EIG questionnaires, publications and other literature crossing the editors' desks. This Bibliography does not include references listed in the Bibliographies of previous issues of Elephant. A total of 217 new references has been added in this issue. Most of the references were compiled on a computer using a special program developed by Gary L. King; the efforts of the King family have been invaluable. The references retrieved from the computer search may have been slightly altered. These alterations may be in the author's own title, hyphenation and word segmentation or translation into English of foreign titles.
    [Show full text]