DOCSLIB.ORG

Community Advisory Group

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community Advisory Group Community Advisory Group eNewsletter APRIL 2017 Benning Road CAG works with Pepco and DDOE on Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment (BHHRA) and Preliminary Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment (BERA) The Benning Road Community Advisory Group (CAG) was formed in 2012 and began work in January of 2013. The CAG was formed as a result of a 2010 Consent Decree signed by Pepco and the District of Columbia Department of Energy and Environment (DOEE). Pepco is required to submit an annual report on its activities to the Federal court every May. The CAG is committed to advising Pepco on the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) of the Benning road plant. The investigation includes both landside and waterside components. The CAG includes representatives from civic associations, ANCs, and environmental groups active within the footprint of the plant. The group meets once a month and its meetings are open to the public. All meeting dates are posted on Facebook (The Community Advisory Group: The RI/FS Benning Road Power Plant Study). The CAG’s mission is to ensure that there is consistent community engagement and participation throughout the implementation of the RI/FS. DDOE and Pepco meet each month with the CAG to answer their questions and provide regular updates on the work. The ultimate objective of the work is to restore the site, help reduce pollution to the Anacostia River, and protect the communities around the former plant. Currently, the RI/FS study is continuing with additional field investigation studies. A request WHAT’S INSIDE: has been made to update previously submitted preliminary Baseline Human Health Risk Dr. Janet A. Phoenix Page 2 Assessment (BHHRA) and preliminary Baseline Justice Department & EPA Ecological Risk Assessment (BERA). These studies Page 3 serve to help us understand the baseline health CAG Members issues of the community and the ecology around Page 4 the former plant. (Continue on Page 2) RI/FS Timeline Page 5 RI/FS Next Steps Page 6 Dr. Janet A. Phoenix was recently appointed Chair of the Technical Services committee of the Community Advisory Group’s Technical Services Committee Dr. Janet A. Phoenix was recently appointed Chair of the Technical Services committee of the Community Advisory Group’s Technical Services Committee. Dr. Phoenix is an Assistant Research Professor in the Department of Health Policy and Management at the George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health. Dr. Phoenix is also the Chair of the DC Environmental Health Collaborative (DCEHC) a loose coalition of organizations working to identify and prioritize environmental health risks in the District of Columbia. The Collaborative was established in 2007, and is a project of the Coalition for Environmentally Safe Communities, a national non-profit organization. Dr. Phoenix was the recipient of a Health Policy Fellowship from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. She received her MD from Howard University and her MPH from the Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University. (Continued from Page 1) A preliminary BHHRA and BERA were submitted to DOEE in April 2015. These documents were revised and finalized in response to DOEE comments in February 2016. The preliminary risk assessments were based on the results of Remedial Investigation field activities completed between January 2013 and December 2014. Both risk assessments concluded that additional field investigation is necessary to address remaining data gaps and uncertainties. Once the additional field investigations are completed, the preliminary BHHRA and BERA will be revised to include the results of these investigations. As requested in DOEE’s January 16, 2016 letter to Pepco (RI Path Forward Letter), the revised risk assessments will incorporate new Site data and additional landside exposure scenarios. The CAG will keep you informed through this community newsletter in the coming months. Learn More About the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study at the Benning Road Facility: http://www.benningservicecenter.com/library/documents/BenningRIFSFactSheet.pdf. April 2, 2016 Pepco Public Presentation on the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study: http://www.benningservicecenter.com/library/documents/BenningRIFSCommunityUpdate.pdf. Page 2 The Justice Department and EPA Reach Clean Water Act Settlement with Pepco to Reduce Pollution to Anacostia River The Department of Justice and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced in January of this year a settlement with the Potomac Electric Power Company (PEPCO) for alleged violations of PEPCO’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit at its service center on Benning Road. The United States filed its complaint in October, 2015 in the US District Court for the District of Columbia after Anacostia Riverkeeper filed a notice of intent to sue under the Clean Water Act and alleged violations of the limits set in PEPCO’s NPDES permit for the Benning Road facility for metals: copper, zinc, iron, and nickel; and total suspended solids (TSS). Under the settlement described in the consent decree filed with the court this January, PEPCO will implement a number of measures to reduce metals in stormwater entering into its drainage system including the installation of best management practices (BMPs) such as booms and filters at each drain leading into the system, enhanced inspections, enhanced staff training, and other measures. PEPCO will install an in-pipe treatment system to further treat the stormwater, which discharges into the Anacostia River. Further, PEPCO will pay a civil penalty of $1.6 million and has agreed to eliminate stormwater discharges from another stormwater outfall from the facility with a mitigation project using vegetation and a holding pond to capture and treat stormwater that currently drains from the Benning Street facility into the Anacostia River. They will pay an additional penalty of $500,000 if they fail to put this last project into operation. Page 3 Community Involvement and CAG Members At the outset of the RI/FS a community involvement plan was developed to guarantee community input into the RI/FS process. The groups consist of neighborhood associations, ANCs, and environmental groups active in the area. The CAG meets every month with Pepco and DOEE officials to discuss the investigation. The CAG worked with Pepco on the design of the April 2, 2016 presentation that was held at River Terrace Elementary School. CAG meetings are open to the public and meeting information can be found on the CAG Facebook page: www.facebook.com/CAGBenningRoad. Current CAG members are as follows: Chair: Johnny Gaither n Maria Johnson n Marc Battle* River Terrace Community Deanwood Community Pepco Organization n Justin Lini n Richard Jackson* Vice Chair: Geraldine Bell Advisory Neighborhood DOEE Parkside Civic Association Commission 7D n Fariba Mahvi* n Javier Barker n Dr. Janet Phoenix Pepco Eastland Gardens Civic D.C. Environmental Health n Association Collaborative Chris Taylor* Pepco n n Rhonda Chapman Irv Sheffey n Groundwork Anacostia The Sierra Club, Jim Foster River, DC Washington, DC Chapter Anacostia Watershed Society n Dorothy Douglas n Trey Sherard Advisory Neighborhood Anacostia Riverkeeper Commission 7D n David Smith n Kathy Henderson Deanwood Citizens Facilitation provided by Advisory Neighborhood Association Kennedy Communications: Commission 5D n Chester Speight, Jr. n Ron Lester n David Holmes MPD 6th District Citizens Facilitator Advisory Neighborhood Advisory Council n Commission 6A Jessica C. Pinkney n Greg Stewart Assistant Facilitator n Latisha Atkins Advisory Neighborhood Ward 7 Council of the Commission 7C District of Columbia n VACANT n Gwendolyn Hunnicutt Advisory Neighborhood Friends of Kingman Park Commission 5C *AD HOC member Page 4 Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Timeline (December 2011 — November 24, 2017) September 8, 2017 May 24, 2017 Pepco’s Submission of Draft Final Pepco and DOEE Submit RI Report Status Report to the Court Subject to timely completion of field work May 31, 2017 November 24, 2017 Completion of RI Phase II Field Work Pepco’s Submission of Draft FS Report Subject to the issuance of permits Not more than 180 days after completion of RI field work (or 120 days after approval Page 5 of treatability study report, if required) Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Next Steps Page 6.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Housing in the Nation's Capital
    Housing in the Nation’s2005 Capital Foreword . 2 About the Authors. 4 Acknowledgments. 4 Executive Summary . 5 Introduction. 12 Chapter 1 City Revitalization and Regional Context . 15 Chapter 2 Contrasts Across the District’s Neighborhoods . 20 Chapter 3 Homeownership Out of Reach. 29 Chapter 4 Narrowing Rental Options. 35 Chapter 5 Closing the Gap . 43 Endnotes . 53 References . 56 Appendices . 57 Prepared for the Fannie Mae Foundation by the Urban Institute Margery Austin Turner G. Thomas Kingsley Kathryn L. S. Pettit Jessica Cigna Michael Eiseman HOUSING IN THE NATION’S CAPITAL 2005 Foreword Last year’s Housing in the Nation’s Capital These trends provide cause for celebration. adopted a regional perspective to illuminate the The District stands at the center of what is housing affordability challenges confronting arguably the nation’s strongest regional econ- Washington, D.C. The report showed that the omy, and the city’s housing market is sizzling. region’s strong but geographically unbalanced But these facts mask a much more somber growth is fueling sprawl, degrading the envi- reality, one of mounting hardship and declining ronment, and — most ominously — straining opportunity for many District families. Home the capacity of working families to find homes price escalation is squeezing families — espe- they can afford. The report provided a portrait cially minority and working families — out of of a region under stress, struggling against the city’s housing market. Between 2000 and forces with the potential to do real harm to 2003, the share of minority home buyers in the the quality of life throughout the Washington District fell from 43 percent to 37 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2020 Transit Development Plan
    DC Circulator Transit Development Plan 2020 Update April 12, 2021 (Page intentionally left blank) DC Circulator 2020 TDP i April 2021 Transit Development Plan 2020 Update DRAFT Table of Contents 1.046T 46T Introduction46T ..............................................................46T .................................................... 1 46T 46T Purpose of the Transit Development Plan (TDP)46T ..............................................................46T ............ 1 46T 46T Transit Development Plan Process46T ..............................................................46T ................................. 3 2.046T 46T DC Circulator System Overview46T ..............................................................46T ....................... 4 46T 46T History46T ..............................................................46T ............................................................................. 4 46T 46T Organizational Structure46T 46T ............................................................................................................... 6 46T 46T Strategic Goals and Objectives46T ..............................................................46T ....................................... 6 46T 46T Levels of Service46T 46T ............................................................................................................................ 8 46T 46T Fare Structure46T ..............................................................46T ............................................................... 10 46T 46T Fleet
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring the Anacostia River Progress on Commitment
    Environmental Health Administration Bureau of Environmental Quality Watershed Protection Division Restoring the Anacostia River Progress on Commitment Mayor Williams’ Administration has made a commitment to clean up the Anacostia River and revitalize its waterfront. The restoration of the river and its neighborhood streams is an important component of the District’s comprehensive initiative to revitalize the community from the Southwest Waterfront up to the Maryland boundary. Below is a list of water quality enhancement projects underway in the watershed in support of the Mayor’s Anacostia Initiative. · Combined Sewer Overflows: DC WASA has proposed a plan to control Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs) in the District at a proposed cost of $1.265 billion in current dollars. The plan calls for reducing CSOs by 96% overall, and by 98% in the Anacostia. This will be achieved by constructing approximately 10 miles of underground tunnels to collect the mixture of wastewater and stormwater. The stored material will be pumped to Blue Plains for treatment before being discharged to the river. In addition, the plan calls for separation of sewers in selected areas, and removal of 13 of the current 59 outfalls. · Wetland Restoration: In partnership with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the Department of Health Environmental Health Administration (DOH EHA) has restored 42 acres of wetlands in Kingman Lake in the Anacostia. DOH EHA is building on that success by creating 18 additional acres of fringe wetland in the upper Anacostia and 10 acres near Heritage Island. · Kingman and Heritage Islands: Jointly funded by USACE and DC, the goal of this project is to restore the southern half of Kingman Island as a natural recreational area.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Application
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Regist er Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Kingman Park Historic District________________________________ Other names/site number: ______________________________________ Name of related multip le property listing: Spingarn, Browne, Young, Phelps Educational Campus; Spingarn High School; Langston Golf Course and Langston Dwellings ______________________________________________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: Western Boundary Line is 200-800 Blk 19th Street NE; Eastern Boundary Line is the Anacostia River along Oklahoma Avenue NE; Northern Boundary Line is 19th- 22nd Street & Maryland Avenue NE; Southern Boundary Line is East Capitol Street at 19th- 22nd Street NE. City or town: Washington, DC__________ State: ____DC________ County: ____________ Not For Publicatio n: Vicinity: ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Spingarn Etal Educational Campus 2.Pdf
    GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HISTORlC PRESERVATION OFFICE * * * lDSTORIC PRESERVATION REVIEW BOARD APPLICA TION FOR HISTORIC LANDMARK OR HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGNATION New Designation _X_ Historic District Amendment of a previous designation Please summarize any amendment(s) _______________________ Browne Junior High School, Charles Young Elementary School, and Phelps Architecture, Construction, and Engineering (aka Vocational) High School, and Their Grounds and Surrounding Landscape's Educational Campus and Historic District. Propertyname __________________________________ Ifany pari ofthe interior is being nominated, it must be specifically identified and described in the narrative statements. 850 - 26th Street, N.E., 820 - 26th Street, N.E., and 704 - 26th Street, N.E., and their grounds and surrounding landscape. Address___________________________________________ Parcel 1600043 1600043 and/or 1600045 Square and lot number(s) _____________________________________________ 5B (5D in 2013) Affected Advisory Neighborhood Commission ___________________________ 1931 - 1952 Date of construction Date of major alteration(s~ ______________ Merrel Coe, Municipal ArchlNathan Wyeth, Architect 19th and 201 Century Colonial Revival Architect(s) Architectural style(s) ___________~_ Public Schools Public Schools Original use _______________ Present use ________________ D.C. Government Propertyowner _______________________________________ 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Legal address of property owner _________________________ Kingman Park Civic
    [Show full text]
  • State of Washington, D.C.'S Neighborhoods A-3
    State of Washington, D.C.’s Neighborhoods Prepared by Peter A. Tatian G. Thomas Kingsley Margery Austin Turner Jennifer Comey Randy Rosso Prepared for The Office of Planning The Government of the District of Columbia September 30, 2008 The Urban Institute 2100 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 UI project no. 08040-000-01 State of Washington, D.C.’s Neighborhoods ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments............................................................................................. vi About this Report ............................................................................................... 1 I. Introduction...................................................................................................... 3 II. Demographics................................................................................................. 9 Population......................................................................................................................9 Households..................................................................................................................13 III. Economy – Jobs and Income ..................................................................... 15 Employed Residents and Unemployment Rate...........................................................15 Poverty and Household Income ..................................................................................18 Public Assistance
    [Show full text]
  • Washington DC Neighborhodd Trends Report 2013/14
    CAPITAL 2013 /14’ MARKET WASHINGTON DC APPRAISAL NEIGHBORHOOD RESEARCH TRENDS DESK REPORT VOLUME 1, MARCH 2014 When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir. —John Maynard Keynes Contents 4 Introduction 4 Conventional, Conforming 30-Yr Fixed-Rate 4 Mortgage-Related Bond Issuance and Outstanding 6 The DC Market: One/ Five/ Ten-Year Relative Returns 7 DC Index vs. 10-City Composite Component Indices 7 Seasonality Index 7 Months of Inventory 10 Total Sales Volume and Financing Trends 11 Median Days on Market (DOM) 11 Distressed Sales 13 Parking 13 Market Value and Sales Volume 16 Washington DC: Neighborhood Trends 2013 16 Sales Volume Leaders 16 Market Cap Leaders 19 Median Sale Price 21 Median Sale to List Price 22 Median Days on Market 23 Distressed Sales 24 Neighborhood Databook 2013 30 Neighborhood Map 31 About Us 32 End Notes / General Disclaimer 1 202 320 3702 [email protected] 1125 11 St NW 402 WDC 20001 www.CapitalMarketAppraisal.com Introduction Mortgage-Related Bond Issuance and Outstanding he Capital Market Appraisal 2013 Neighborhood Trends Over the prior year residential mortgage-related bond is- Report was developed to provide market participants suance3 declined 7.6%, falling from $2.019 trillion in 2012 to with a comprehensive overview of the residential real $1.866 trillion in 2013. Over the same period of time resi- T 1 3 estate market in Washington, DC (DC Market ). dential mortgage-related bonds outstanding declined 1.04% from $8.179 trillion in 2012 to $8.094 trillion in 2013. As the We begin by highlighting a few broad measure—medium term overwhelming majority of residential mortgages are packaged trends in the mortgage market.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Unfair Share 3
    Our Unfair Share 3: Race & Pollution in Washington, D.C. African American Environmentalist Association 2000 The African American Environmentalist Association (AAEA), founded in 1985, is dedicated to protecting the environment, enhancing the human ecology, promoting the efficient use of natural resources and increasing African American participation in the environmental movement. AAEA is one of the nation's oldest African American-led environmental organizations. AAEA’s main goals are to deliver environmental information and services directly into the black community. AAEA works to clean up neighborhoods by implementing toxics education, energy, water and clean air programs. AAEA includes an African American point of view in environmental policy decision-making. AAEA resolves environmental racism and environmental justice issues through the application of practical environmental solutions. Our Unfair Share 3: Race and Pollution in Washington, D.C. Author Norris McDonald President Sulaiman Mahdi Contributing Editor Research Assistant Pamela Pittman Administrative Assistant Pamela Jones Editing Red Letter Group, Inc Editing Assistance Ronald Taylor Contributing Scientists Dr. Felix Nwoke Dr. Gustave Jackson © 2000 by the African American Environmentalist Association. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the African American Environmentalist Association. Funding for his report was provided by a grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Environmental Justice and Friends of AAEA. The views, recommendations and opinions expressed in this report are those of the African American Environmentalist Association and do not necessarily reflect the views, recommendations or opinions of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Architecture Overview Presentation Overview
    HISTORIC D.C. NEIGHBORHOODS History and Architecture Overview Presentation Overview D.C.’s Historic Most Common Deeper Dive Neighborhoods Architectural Styles 2 D.C. Historic Districts There are nearly 70 historic districts in Washington, DC! Generally, we separate these into three main categories: • Government and Institutional Historic Districts • Park and Parkway Historic Districts • Neighborhood Historic Districts 3 DC Historic Districts Neighborhood Historic • Kingman Park Districts include: • LeDroit Park • Anacostia • Logan Circle • Blagden Alley/Naylor Court • Massachusetts Avenue • Bloomingdale • Meridian Hill • Capitol Hill • Mount Pleasant • Cleveland Park • Mount Vernon Square • Downtown • Mount Vernon Triangle • Dupont Circle • Shaw • Emerald Street • Sheridan Kalorama • Foggy Bottom • Sixteenth Street • Fourteenth Street • Strivers' Section • Foxhall Village • Takoma Park • Georgetown • U Street • Grant Circle • Union Market • Grant Road • Washington Heights • Kalorama Triangle • Woodley Park 4 D.C.’s Oldest Building? • “The Lindens,” 1754 • Originally built in Danvers, Massachusetts and rebuilt in D.C. in 1935- 1937 The Lindens (Architectural Digest) 5 The Federal City • The District of Columbia was created in 1791, while the federal government arrived in 1800. • Most of the area was still rural when the District was created. Map of the 18th-Century Land Grants in Washington (Washington History) 6 The Federal City • Originally divided between Washington County and Washington City. • Two previously settled areas were Georgetown and Alexandria. • Between 1800 and 1860, clustered settlements formed in some areas like Capitol Hill, Foggy Bottom, and Southwest. Map of the original District of Columbia. Colored portions are Washington City (Library of Congress) 7 Federal Italianate Second Empire Common Architectural Styles Queen Anne 8 Historic D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Washington, D.C.'S Neighborhoods, 2010
    2010 Prepared by Jennifer Comey Chris Narducci Peter A. Tatian Prepared for The Office of Planning The Government of the District of Columbia November 2010 The Urban Institute 2100 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 Copyright © November 2010. The Urban Institute. All rights reserved. Except for short quotes, no part of this report may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the Urban Institute. The Urban Institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan policy research and educational organization that examines the social, economic, and governance problems facing the nation. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders. State of Washington, D.C.’s Neighborhoods iii CONTENTS About this Report ............................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 5 II. Demographics ................................................................................................. 7 Population ................................................................................................................... 7 Households ................................................................................................................12 III. Economy—Jobs and Income .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Crossing / 200 & 250 Massachusetts Ave Nw
    CAPITOL CROSSING / 200 & 250 MASSACHUSETTS AVE NW / WASHINGTON, DC 1 W 4 N St N t h Florid S ¤50 t Gallaudet Ridge St NW Patterson St NE a Ave NE Shepherd Park N Mt Vernon Square University W Takoma Barnaby Woods US-50 SOUTH VIEW OF CAPITOL CROSSING | RENDERING SHAW W M St NW M St NE US-1 hip • edgy • residential N t Lamond Riggs M $132,419 AVG HH INCOME S Brightwood CONVENTION a New YorkN Ave NW s h Chevy Chase s e (MD) ac t CENTER h w us 9 Pierce St NW Pierce St NE e t t J Friendship Heights Queens Chapel s Av e Brightwood Park e L St NW r N s NOMA Abbey Pl NE W e 1st St NW L St NW L St NW y L St NE Fort Totten new • evolving • connected 16th Street Heights A American University Park Tenleytown Van Ness v North Michigan Park K MARYLAND e $108,903 AVG HH INCOME Petworth N Crestwood W Spring Valley K St NW Mt Vernon MT VERNON TRIANGLE University Heights ¤29 K St NW K St NW K St NE Cathedral Heights Cleveland Park Square Brookland new • up and coming Palisades Mount Pleasant 1st St NE Wesley Heights Woodbridge Franklin Park $116,119 AVG HH INCOME Park View NW Columbia Heights N Capitol St NE Woodley Park Edgewood McMillan Langdon Fort Lincoln Glover Park I St NW I St NW I St NE Adams Morgan 2 Gateway Brentwood LeDroit Park n 3rd St NW U Street North Shaw Kalorama Bloomingdale d Foxhall Arboretum Eckington Ivy City S New York Ave NW 5th St NW 4th St NW North Dupont t 17th Street Georgetown 14th Street N Truxton Circle H St N W H St N E Logan Circle Shaw Georgetown East E Union Market District NE 5th St NE South Dupont NoMa Trinidad MASSACHUSETTS
    [Show full text]
  • A Transportation Guide to 5200 2Nd Street, NW
    Washington Latin Public Charter School A Transportation Guide To 5200 2nd Street, NW Table of Contents The Location ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 Overview of Transportation Options ………………………………….………………………………………………… 1 Bus Transportation ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 Metro Transportation ………………………………………………………………………………………… 2 Washington Latin Chartered Bus Service ……………………………………………………………. 3 Carpooling …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 Street Smarts ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Transportation Details by Wards …………………………………………………………………………………………….5 Ward 1 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 Ward 2 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 6 Ward 3 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... 8 Ward 4 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 Ward 5 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..10 Ward 6 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..11 Ward 7 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 12 Ward 8 ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 13 i The Location As of the start of the 2013-14 school year, Washington Latin Public Charter School is located at 5200 2nd Street, NW between Hamilton and Ingraham Streets, on the old site of Rudolph Elementary School. The site, including the gymnasium when completed, will be approximately 75,000 square feet on just over 5 acres and includes a large playing field. We are located in a quiet, residential neighborhood with older buildings populated mostly by older residents and some young families. There are seven schools within
    [Show full text]