The Seanad Special Select Committee on the Withdrawal of the UK from the EU Interim Report on the Impacts of Brexit July 2021 33/Seanadwukeu/001

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Seanad Special Select Committee on the Withdrawal of the UK from the EU Interim Report on the Impacts of Brexit July 2021 33/Seanadwukeu/001 Roghchoiste Speisialta an tSeanaid um an Ríocht Aontaithe do Tharraingt Siar as an Aontach Eorpach Tuarascáil Eatramhach ar Éifeachtaí Brexit Iúil 2021 The Seanad Special Select Committee on the Withdrawal of the UK from the EU Interim Report on the Impacts of Brexit July 2021 33/SeanadWUKEU/001 Ohh Tithe an Oireachtais Roghchoiste Speisialta an tSeanaid um an Ríocht Aontaithe do Tharraingt Siar as an Aontach Eorpach Tuarascáil eatramhach ar éifeachtaí Brexit Iúil 2021 ____________________________ Houses of the Oireachtas Seanad Special Select Committee on the Withdrawal of the UK from the EU Interim report on the impacts of Brexit July 2021 33/SeanadWUKEU/001 Contents Cathaoirleach’s Foreword ....................................................................................................................... 1 stalishent o ecial Committee ...................................................................................................... 2 acground and revious reorts ........................................................................................................... 2 EU- rade and Cooperation greement TC) ................................................................................... 3 Protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland .............................................................................................. 3 Committee ngagements ........................................................................................................................ 4 Ke themes.............................................................................................................................................. 6 1. rade Flows and Cstoms ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Inrastrctre .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2. he Rles of rigin ..................................................................................................................... 12 2. he Protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland ............................................................................. 1 2.1 Citizens’ Rights in Northern Ireland ost-reit ......................................................................... 1 3. utal recognition of roessional ualiications ........................................................................ 22 3.1 dcation and Research .............................................................................................................. 2 4. ealth – Cross-border Health irective CBD) .............................................................................. 28 5. ata Flows ..................................................................................................................................... 1 6. Ftre relations ............................................................................................................................. 34 Recommendations and conclusions going orward rom evidence presented to the Committee ...... 38 Appendi 1 – Mebership o the Committee ...................................................................................... 46 Appendi 2 – erms of Reference of the Committee ........................................................................... 47 Contents Cathaoirleach’s Foreword Cathaoirleach’s Foreword ....................................................................................................................... 1 stalishent o ecial Committee ...................................................................................................... 2 “he reit reerendum and the ensing withdrawal rocess represents an etraordinar period in relations etween the EU and the .. and indeed Ireland acground and revious reorts ........................................................................................................... 2 and the U.K. The four years that followed the UK’s vote to leave the ropean EU- rade and Cooperation greement TC) ................................................................................... 3 Union was a period of intense negotiation, with several extensions to the UK’s oicial withdrawal. Protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland .............................................................................................. 3 Committee ngagements ........................................................................................................................ 4 he rade and Cooperation greement that will inorm the futre relationship o the and the was reached on the 24 December 2020. Not all asects o the Ke themes.............................................................................................................................................. 6 futre relationship were thoroughly wored through and any outstanding isses remain. he 1. rade Flows and Cstoms ............................................................................................................... 7 Committee commenced its wor in late 2020 and agreed that the impact o the ost-31 ecember 2020 arrangements on arious sectors would be central to its or Programme. 1.1 Inrastrctre .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2. he Rles of rigin ..................................................................................................................... 12 he Committee sought to rovide a platorm or sinesses communities and civil society groups to discss the impact o reit and the operation o the Trade and Cooperation greeent. he 2. he Protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland ............................................................................. 1 intention o the Committee was to rovide an in-deth and detailed analysis o the isses impacting 2.1 Citizens’ Rights in Northern Ireland ost-reit ......................................................................... 1 people and sinesses on the island of Ireland. 3. utal recognition of roessional ualiications ........................................................................ 22 he Committee rther sought to engage in inter-parliaentary relationship ilding and held a number o meetings with olitical reresentatives rom Northern Ireland the EU and the .. to gain 3.1 dcation and Research .............................................................................................................. 2 an international perspective to the Committee’s work. 4. ealth – Cross-border Health irective CBD) .............................................................................. 28 he Committee held a series of blic hearings rom Deceber 2020 ntil une 2021 with relevant 5. ata Flows ..................................................................................................................................... 1 staeholder groups. hile it was clear that the withdrawal o the was going to hae serious 6. Ftre relations ............................................................................................................................. 34 reercssions or Ireland the Committee sought to identify the everyda isses aecting citizens and sinesses across the island. igniicant isses were identiied throughout Committee Recommendations and conclusions going orward rom evidence presented to the Committee ...... 38 engageents some o which were onl brought to the ore in the months ollowing reit. hese Appendi 1 – Mebership o the Committee ...................................................................................... 46 included impacts on trade flows and customs checs mutal recognition o aliications education, health, citizens’ rights and data flows. In addition, particular issues arose surronding the Appendi 2 – erms of Reference of the Committee ........................................................................... 47 rle o origin and mied origin roducts on the island o Ireland and srrounding the Protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland oth o which continue to resent difficlties in ongoing negotiations. i months into the operation of a new trading enironment and a signiicantly altered olitical landscae here is a etter understanding o the tre impact o reit and the issues lowing rom the rade and Cooperations greement that still reuire wor. he Committee cannot overstate the need or a proactive collaorative resonse to the implications arising rom reit all relevant parties to ensre a strong utre relationship etween the U and the and the and Ireland. he Committee has in this Interi Reort provided solutions-focsed recommendations and loos orward to its return in the Autn where it will re-commence its eamination in order to roduce its inal reort by 1 December 2021. I commend this Reort to eanad ireann with a reest that the report be deated as soon as ossible. I would like to epress my gratitde on ehal o the Committee to all the witnesses who attended our blic hearings to give eidence for the Interim Report o the Committee. I would also lie to than the sta o the Committee Secretariat who assisted in the preparation of this report.” _____________ enator Lisa Chabers Cathaoirleach – Jul 221 1 | Page stablismen o ecial ommittee The eanad pecial elect Committee on the ithdrawal of the United Kingdom from the uropean Union was estalished y a motion in eanad ireann on 6 ctober 2020 to: ➢ monitor Ireland’s preparedness for all possible outcomes following the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union;
Recommended publications
  • Europaparlamentet 2019–2024
    Europaparlamentet 2019–2024 Utskottet för miljö, folkhälsa och livsmedelssäkerhet ENVI_PV(2020)0305_1 PROTOKOLL från sammanträdet den 5 mars 2020 kl. 9.30–12.30 BRYSSEL Sammanträdet öppnades torsdagen den 5 mars 2020 kl. 9.40 med utskottets ordförande, Pascal Canfin, som ordförande. 1. Godkännande av föredragningslistan ENVI_OJ(2020)0305_1 Föredragningslistan godkändes i den form som framgår av detta protokoll. 2. Meddelanden från ordföranden Ordföranden meddelade följande: Tolkning: Tolkningen motsvarade utskottets normala språkprofil: 21 språk tolkades med undantag för estniska, maltesiska och iriska. Elektroniska sammanträdeshandlingar/webbsändning: Ordföranden informerade om att sammanträdeshandlingar som vanligt fanns tillgängliga i elektroniskt format via programmet för e-sammanträden och att sammanträdet skulle sändas på nätet. Rapport från ad hoc-delegationen till 25:e partskonferensen för FN:s ramkonvention om klimatförändringar i Madrid, Spanien, den 10– 14 december 2019: Ordföranden informerade om att sammanträdeshandlingarna innehöll rapporten från ad hoc-delegationen till 25:e partskonferensen för FN:s ramkonvention om klimatförändringar i Madrid, Spanien, den 10– 14 december 2019. PV\1204450SV.docx PE650.672v01-00 SV Förenade i mångfaldenSV 3. Meddelanden från ordföranden om samordnarnas rekommendationer av den 18 februari 2020 Ordföranden meddelade att samordnarnas rekommendationer av den 18 februari 2020 hade skickats ut elektroniskt, och att de, eftersom inga invändningar lagts fram, ansågs vara godkända (se bilaga
    [Show full text]
  • Power Ranking of Meps in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament
    Who has the critical vote? Power ranking of MEPs in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament A. Kovacs¹; I. Fertő²; L. Kóczy²; B. Sziklai²; A.A. Nás² 1: Tec de Monterrey, Department of International Business, Mexico, 2: Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics, Hungary Corresponding author email: [email protected] Abstract: We analyze the voting power of the members of the agricultural committee of the European Parliament using a spatial Banzhaf power index. Using a novel dataset of roll-call votes in the current EP-term, we identify critical members whose votes are necessary to form winning coalitions. We found that committee members with formal positions, EP group coordinators as well as German, French, Italian and British members are powerful actors. Nevertheless, rapporteurs are not necessarily influential. We also concluded that members with moderate ideological position but from Member States with extreme agricultural importance are the most powerful ones. Acknowledegment: JEL Codes: C71, A12 #1419 Who has the critical vote? Power ranking of MEPs in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament Abstract We analyze the voting power of the members of the agricultural committee of the European Parliament using a spatial Banzhaf power index. Using a novel dataset of roll-call votes in the current EP-term, we identify critical members whose votes are necessary to form winning coalitions. We found that committee members with formal positions, EP group coordinators as well as German, French, Italian and British members are powerful actors. Nevertheless, rapporteurs are not necessarily influential. We also concluded that members with moderate ideological position but from Member States with extreme agricultural importance are the most powerful ones.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • From Understanding to Cooperation Promoting Interfaith Encounters to Meet Global Challenges
    20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS FROM UNDERSTANDING TO COOPERATION PROMOTING INTERFAITH ENCOUNTERS TO MEET GLOBAL CHALLENGES Zagreb, 7 - 8 December 2017 20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS / 3 PROGRAMME 10:00-12:30 hrs / Sessions I and II The role of religion in European integration process: expectations, potentials, limits Wednesday, 6 December 10:00-11:15 hrs Session I 20.30 hrs. / Welcome Reception hosted by the Croatian Delegation / Memories and lessons learned during 20 years of Dialogue Thursday, 7 December Co-Chairs: György Hölvényi MEP and Jan Olbrycht MEP, Co-Chairmen of 09:00 hrs / Opening the Working Group on Intercultural Activities and Religious Dialogue György Hölvényi MEP and Jan Olbrycht MEP, Co-Chairmen of the Working Opening message: Group on Intercultural Activities and Religious Dialogue Dubravka Šuica MEP, Head of Croatian Delegation of the EPP Group Alojz Peterle MEP, former Responsible of the Interreligious Dialogue Welcome messages Interventions - Mairead McGuinness, First Vice-President of the European Parliament, - Gordan Jandroković, Speaker of the Croatian Parliament responsible for dialogue with religions (video message) - Joseph Daul, President of the European People’ s Party - Joseph Daul, President of the European People’ s Party - Vito Bonsignore, former Vice-Chairman of the EPP Group responsible for - Andrej Plenković, Prime Minister of Croatia Dialogue with Islam - Mons. Prof. Tadeusz Pieronek, Chairman of the International Krakow Church Conference Organizing Committee - Stephen Biller, former EPP Group Adviser responsible for Interreligious Dialogue Discussion 20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS / 5 4 /20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS 11:15-12:30 hrs.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Amendments 1
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Constitutional Affairs 2020/2088(INI) 20.7.2020 AMENDMENTS 1 - 265 Draft report Pascal Durand (PE653.777v01-00) Stocktaking of European elections (2020/2088(INI)) AM\1210438EN.docx PE655.711v01-00 EN United in diversity EN AM_Com_NonLegReport PE655.711v01-00 2/134 AM\1210438EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Damian Boeselager on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Motion for a resolution Citation 2 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union, in particular articles 39 and 52(1) thereof, Or. en Amendment 2 Leila Chaibi Motion for a resolution Citation 2 a (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and in particular Article 21 thereof, Or. fr Amendment 3 Leila Chaibi Motion for a resolution Citation 2 b (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and in particular Article 25 thereof, Or. fr AM\1210438EN.docx 3/134 PE655.711v01-00 EN Amendment 4 Leila Chaibi Motion for a resolution Citation 2 c (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), and in particular Article 29 thereof, Or. fr Amendment 5 Leila Chaibi Motion for a resolution Citation 2 d (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the European Pillar of Social Rights, and in particular its principle 1, Or. fr Amendment 6 Leila Chaibi Motion for a resolution Citation 2 e (new) Motion for a resolution Amendment - having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Article 21 thereof, Or.
    [Show full text]
  • Ms Mairead Mcguinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr
    TO: Ms Mairead McGuinness European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability and the Capital Markets Union Mr Valdis Dombrovskis European Commission Executive Vice-President for An Economy that Works for People CC: Mr Frans Timmermans European Commission Executive Vice-President for the European Green Deal Ms Kadri Simson European Commissioner for Energy Brussels, 13 April 2021 Dear Executive Vice-President Dombrovskis, Dear Commissioner McGuinness, We are convinced that the Taxonomy Regulation is crucial for the European Union to achieve both the new greenhouse gas emissions reduction target for 2030 and climate neutrality by 2050. Additionally, the Regulation should help strengthening the European Union’s strategic resilience and global economic competitiveness, maintaining its energy security and affordability, boosting growth and job creation and supporting a just and inclusive energy transition that leaves nobody behind. However, to what extent the Taxonomy Regulation will ultimately meet these expectations depends primarily on the technical screening criteria (TSC) defined in the Delegated Act on climate change mitigation and adaptation. We understand the European Commission will publish it later this month, whereupon the European Parliament may make full use of its scrutinizing prerogatives under Article 290 TFEU. In advance of its publication, we would like to share with you some of our major concerns regarding the revised draft version of this delegated act. Firstly, it is indispensable that the Taxonomy Regulation takes into account transition at the energy system level and supports the most cost-efficient decarbonisation pathway for each Member State in line with the principle of technology neutrality. In this context, it is key to acknowledge the role of gaseous fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report
    SPECIAL REPORT Key points for the 8th term of the European Parliament (2014-2019) Madrid, November 2014 BARCELONA BOGOTÁ BUENOS AIRES LIMA LISBOA MADRID MÉXICO PANAMÁ QUITO RIO J SÃO PAULO SANTIAGO STO DOMINGO KEY POINTS FOR THE 8TH TERM OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2014-2019) 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2. THE LATEST ELECTION The European Parliament has, since its creation in 1962 in the 3. MAIN ISSUES IN THE context of the evolution of European integration, become the LEGISLATIVE AGENDA European Union (EU) Institution to have gained more power and 4. SPANISH DELEGATION relevance in the decision-making process of the Union. Indeed, over the years, it has gained increasingly important powers, legitimized 5. CONCLUSIONS and differentiated by the fact that it is the only EU Institution to be 6. APPENDIX 1: COMPETENCES elected by universal suffrage. 7. APPENDIX 2: CURRENT COMPOSITION OF THE It has evolved from being a mere advisory body to having the COMMITTEES power to co-legislate, together with the Council, in more than 85 legislative areas, exercising legislative powers as well as powers 8. APPENDIX 3: THE CURRENT of budgetary and political control. It also wields a considerable BUREAU OF THE EUROPEAN amount of political influence, and its competences include those PARLIAMENT of electing the President of the European Commission, vetoing the 9. APPENDIX 4: EUROPEAN appointment of the College, and even forcing the resignation of the PARLIAMENT DELEGATIONS entire Commission after a motion of no confidence. AUTHORS The official headquarters of the Parliament are in Strasbourg, where the main plenary sessions are held.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Activity Report 2020 European Parliament Liaison Office in Ireland Europe House 12-14 Lower Mount Street Dublin D02 W710 Tel
    The European Parliament Liaison Office in Ireland Annual activity report 2020 European Parliament Liaison Office in Ireland Europe House 12-14 Lower Mount Street Dublin D02 W710 Tel. +353 (0)1 6057900 Website: www.europarl.ie Facebook: @EPinIreland Twitter: @EPinIreland and @EPIreland_Edu Instagram: @ep_ireland © European Union/EP, 2021 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Contents Contents 3 Top Posts and Tweets in 2020 34 Top Content Highlighting MEPs’ Work 36 Introduction 5 Top Content on Cooperation with other Members of the Organisations and MEPs 39 European Parliament for Ireland 6 Top Content Produced by EPLO Dublin 40 Remote Plenary Sessions 7 Strategy 41 Social Media Data Overview 41 Outreach Activities 10 Cross-border activities 13 Activities for young people 42 Regular newsletter 17 European Parliament Ambassador School Campaigns 18 Programme (EPAS) 42 International Women’s Day 18 Euroscola 44 Charlemagne Youth Prize 19 Information visits to Europe House Europeans Against COVID-19 19 in Dublin 45 European Citizen’s Prize 21 Blue Star Programme 45 Lux Audience Award 21 Other youth activities 46 Sakharov Prize 21 Back to school 47 Bridge the Pond initiative 48 Other information activities 22 Annexes 43 EP grant programme Annex I - Ambassador Schools for information activities 24 Academic Year 2019-2020 49 Media 25 Annex II - Ambassador Schools Journalism students and the EP 25 Academic Year 2020-2021 50 Europeans Against COVID-19 26 Annex III - Schools representing Ireland at Commission hearings and
    [Show full text]
  • Intercultural & Religious Dialogue
    INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE ACTIVITY REPORT 2018 INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE Activity Report 2018 INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE ACTIVITY REPORT 2018 3 INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE Activity Report 2018 Activity Report 2018 INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENT DATE ACTIVITY PAGE The EPP Group Intercultural and Religious Dialogue activities aim to promote mutual understanding and an active sense of European citizenship for a peaceful living together. Decision makers are called 6 February Working Group Meeting 7 to provide answers to the complex crisis with political, economic, religious and cultural implications on Initiatives of religious organisations to face climate change in Europe. with CEC 'Intercultural and Religious Dialogue’ does not mean theological discussions in the European 28 February Conference on Oriental Christians in MASHREQ Region: 9 Consequences of the conflicts in the Middle-East on the Parliament. It is about listening to people from the sphere of religion and exchanging views with Christians Communities and future perspectives representatives of academia, governments, European Institutions on issues of common interest or concern and in connection to religion and intercultural relations. 6 March Seminar on the Importance for Europe to Protect Christian 13 Cultural Heritage - Views from the Orthodox Churches The Working Group on 'Intercultural and Religious Dialogue' is an official structure of the EPP 13 March Working Group Meeting 16 Group and is co-chaired by Jan
    [Show full text]
  • Dáil Éireann
    DÁIL ÉIREANN AN COMHCHOISTE UM GHNÓTHAÍ AN AONTAIS EORPAIGH JOINT COMMITTEE ON EUROPEAN UNION AFFAIRS Dé Céadaoin, 14 Feabhra 2018 Wednesday, 14 February 2018 Tháinig an Comhchoiste le chéile ag 2 p.m. The Joint Committee met at 2 p.m. Comhaltaí a bhí i láthair / Members present: Teachtaí Dála / Deputies Seanadóirí / Senators Colm Brophy, Paul Coghlan, David Cullinane, Gerard P. Craughwell, Bernard J. Durkan, Terry Leyden, Seán Haughey, Neale Richmond. Mattie McGrath. I láthair / In attendance: Senators John Dolan, Billy Lawless and Niall Ó Donnghaile. Teachta / Deputy Michael Healy-Rae sa Chathaoir / in the Chair. 1 JEUA Engagement with MEPs Chairman: Senator Neale Richmond has let us know that he will be a little late. A number of MEPs, including Brian Crowley, Brian Hayes, Seán Kelly and Nessa Childers, were not able to make it here today and we have been asked to note their apologies. I met with Brian Hayes in person a few days ago and he explained to me what he is doing today. He made it clear that he wanted to be here, but he cannot, nor can the others. Due to Murphy’s law, at approximately 3.10 p.m., I will have to vacate the Chair to go to the Dáil as we have been selected for a Topi- cal Issue debate. I remind members, witnesses and people in the Visitors Gallery to ensure their mobile phones are switched off. I welcome Ms Mairead McGuinness, MEP, Ms Deirdre Clune, MEP, Ms Liadh Ní Riada, MEP, and Mr. Matt Carthy, MEP, and I thank them for taking the time to engage with the committee today.
    [Show full text]
  • IPAV 45Th AGM & Annual Conference
    The Property Professional Summer 2016 IPAV 45th AGM & ANNUAL CONFERENCE THE PROPERTY PROFESSIONAL Welcome | Summer ‘16 Message from the CEO ear Member I wish to sincerely thank all the members who attended our recent AGM and D Annual Conference in Castleknock Hotel & Country Club on June 11. I wish to congratulate our new President Alan Redmond who took over the reins of office from Eamon O’Flaherty. I know Alan will continue Eamon’s great work in representing members’ interests over the coming year. The new President outlined his priorities to the Annual Conference and a summary is contained in this issue. Congratulations also to our new Senior Vice-President Brian Dempsey and our new Junior Vice-President Ella Dunphy on their election. The Conference and Annual Gala Dinner again saw a huge turnout by members and guests Front cover: Tánaiste Frances Fitzgerald TD and IPAV President Alan Redmond which is a real sign of the thriving and forward-looking organisation that IPAV is today. The afternoon Conference was another opportunity for members to upskill in various aspects of THE PROPERTY PROFESSIONAL our profession as well as being a great social occasion to meet fellow members. IS THE MAGAZINE OF This year we were particularly delighted to have the Tánaiste and Minister for Justice & THE INstITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL Equality Frances Fitzgerald present to officially open the Conference. We were also delighted AUCTIONEERS & VALUERS to welcome back once again as our Conference Facilitator Ivan Yates, whose skills gave a sharp and focused edge to the presentations. Details of the Conference and Gala Dinner and 129 LOWER BAGGOT STREET DUBLIN 2 a photo special are featured in this issue.
    [Show full text]