DOCSLIB.ORG

Intercultural & Religious Dialogue

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intercultural & Religious Dialogue INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE ACTIVITY REPORT 2018 INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE Activity Report 2018 INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE ACTIVITY REPORT 2018 3 INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE Activity Report 2018 Activity Report 2018 INTRODUCTION TABLE OF CONTENT DATE ACTIVITY PAGE The EPP Group Intercultural and Religious Dialogue activities aim to promote mutual understanding and an active sense of European citizenship for a peaceful living together. Decision makers are called 6 February Working Group Meeting 7 to provide answers to the complex crisis with political, economic, religious and cultural implications on Initiatives of religious organisations to face climate change in Europe. with CEC 'Intercultural and Religious Dialogue’ does not mean theological discussions in the European 28 February Conference on Oriental Christians in MASHREQ Region: 9 Consequences of the conflicts in the Middle-East on the Parliament. It is about listening to people from the sphere of religion and exchanging views with Christians Communities and future perspectives representatives of academia, governments, European Institutions on issues of common interest or concern and in connection to religion and intercultural relations. 6 March Seminar on the Importance for Europe to Protect Christian 13 Cultural Heritage - Views from the Orthodox Churches The Working Group on 'Intercultural and Religious Dialogue' is an official structure of the EPP 13 March Working Group Meeting 16 Group and is co-chaired by Jan Olbrycht MEP and György Hölvényi MEP, in which a number of EPP on the roots of fundamental rights and the rule of law Group Members of the European Parliament gather monthly to deal with religious and intercultural issues. 20 March Extraordinary Working Group Meeting 17 with Testimonies of Christian university students from the Middle East and Africa 22 March Working Lunch with Ambassadors (OIC, Turkey, Ivory Coast) 18 10 April Meeting with Journalists on Politics and Religions: EPP Group´s 18 approach to dialogue with representatives of Churches and religious communities 10 April Conference on Religious rituals and Fundamental Rights 20 24 April Extraordinary Working Group Meeting on Religious freedom in 22 light of the 70th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights 2 May Conference with Orthodox Churches: 24 Visit of Patriarch Philaret from Ukraine 2 May Annual Dinner with all Ambassadors of OIC member states 27 29 May Working Group Meeting on the situation of Christians in Syria 28 12 June Working Group Meeting on current points of dialogue between 29 Bishops’ Conferences and political authorities of the EU Manfred Weber MEP, Chairman of the European People's Party Group (EPP Group) in the EP and the Co-Chairmen of 27 June Extraordinary Working Group Meeting 30 the EPP Group Working Group on Intercultural and Religious Dialogue: György Hölvényi MEP and Jan Olbrycht MEP with H.E. Joseph Tobji, Maronite Archbishop of Aleppo 4 5 INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE Activity Report 2018 Activity Report 2018 TABLE OF CONTENT EPP Working Group DATE ACTIVITY PAGE INTERCULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE 27 June Working lunch with High - Level religious Delegation 31 STRASBOURG, TUESDAY, 6 FEBRUARY 2018 from Azerbaijan EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 27 June Seminar on Interreligious Dialogue in International Relations 33 AGENDA 28 - 29 June Visit to Georgia and Conference on the role of Churches and 35 religious communities in the European Integration process: 1. Opening by the Co-Chairman of the Working Group Mr Jan Olbrycht MEP Georgia - EU perspective 2. Exchange of views with Rev. Dr Peter Pavlovic, Study Secretary at the Conference of European Churches on “Initiatives of Religious Organisations to face climate change” 3 July Working Group Meeting 39 on Victims of Ethnic and Religious Violence in the Middle East 3. Date of next meeting 11 September Working Group Meeting on Antisemitism in Europe 40 12 September Working Group Lunch Meeting 41 with Archbishop Jean-Claude Hollerich S.J., President of COMECE 25 September Meeting with OIC Ambassadors from ASEAN countries 42 5 - 6 October Churches Conference in Krakow 43 9 October Working breakfast on the Role of religious actors in Conflict 49 prevention, management and resolution 17 - 19 October XXI Annual Interreligious Dialogue in Lisbon (Mafra) 51 13 November Working Group Meeting with Israel’s Ambassador to the EU 58 28 November “Religions and the culture of peace” Seminar on the promotion of 60 Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue 4 December Presentation of the Aid to the Church in Need ‘Freedom 64 of religion’ Report 6 -7 December Interreligious Dialogue Initiatives: 66 Tunne Kelam MEP, Rev. Dr Peter Pavlovic, Rev. Sören Lenz, Sean Kelly MEP The model of “Courtyard of the Gentiles” and other initiatives of Dialogue in the Vatican/Rome Climate change is a matter for all. It is a moral and ethical challenge that goes beyond denominational and religious differences. Climate change, sustainable development, and care for creation are intertwined with the Christian faith. Thus, faith communities can and must play a clear role in responding to widespread ecological devastation and building up sustainable communities. 6 7 INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE Activity Report 2018 Activity Report 2018 VISIT OF H.E. MONS. JEAN-CLÉMENT JEANBART ARCHBISHOP OF THE MELKITE GREEK CATHOLIC ARCHEPARCHY OF ALEPPO, SYRIA CONFERENCE ON ORIENTAL CHRISTIANS IN MASHREQ REGION: THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE CONFLICTS IN THE MIDDLE-EAST ON THE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITIES WEDNESDAY, 28 FEBRUARY 2018 EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, BRUSSELS PROGRAMME WELCOME György Hölvényi MEP, Co-Chairman of the Working Group on Intercultural Relations and Interreligious Dialogue of the EPP Group KEYNOTE SPEECH Mons. Jean-Clément Jeanbart, Archbishop of the Melkite Greek Catholic Archeparchy of Aleppo, Syria SHORT INTERVENTIONS BY REPRESENTATIVES OF RELIGIOUS ORGANISATIONS • Rev. Olivier Poquillon OP, General Secretary of the Commission of the Bishops' Conferences of the EU (COMECE) • Archimandrite Fr. Aimilianos Bogiannou, Director of Liaison Office of the Orthodox Church to the European Union • Elizabeta Kitanović, Executive Secretary for Human Rights, Conference of European Churches (CEC) • Michel Varton, Director of Open Doors, France INTERVENTIONS BY EPP GROUP MEPS AND DEBATE • Mairead McGuinness, First Vice-President of the European Parliament, responsible for dialogue with religions • Michèle Alliot-Marie MEP, Chair of the Delegation for relations with the Arab Peninsula and Head of the Study Group on Eastern Christians in the European Parliament • Cristian Dan Preda MEP, EPP Group Coordinator for Foreign Affairs CONCLUSIONS Jan Olbrycht, MEP, Co-Chairman of the Working Group on Intercultural Relations and Interreligious Dialogue of the EPP Group 8 9 INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE Activity Report 2018 Activity Report 2018 Jean-Clément Jeanbart, Greek Catholic Archbishop of Aleppo, expressed the hope that the European Parliament, using its influence, would promote peace-building in Syria through a political solution. The greatest challenge is to help the return of Christians, especially for those who sought shelter not only in other parts of the country or in the surrounding states, but who left their home country far behind. Jean-Clément Jeanbart recalled that his visit to Hungary also contributed to his aspirations. MEPs urged the European Union and its Member States to give priority support to the return of Christians to their ancient cities as soon as possible. More effective peace-building initiatives and diplomatic efforts are needed from Europe, with an increased humanitarian assistance. László Tőkés MEP, Tunne Kelam MEP, Željana Zovko MEP, Rev. Olivier Poquillon OP, General Secretary of COMECE View of the meeting room Mons Jean-Clément Jeanbart, Archbishop of the Melkite Greek Catholic Archeparchy of Aleppo, Syria and György Hölvényi MEP György Hölvényi MEP, Jean-Clément Jeanbart, Greek Catholic Archbishop of Aleppo, Antonio Tajani, President of the European Parliament, Jan Olbrycht MEP 10 11 INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE INTERCULTURAL & RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE Activity Report 2018 Activity Report 2018 EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS DIALOGUE: SEMINAR ON THE IMPORTANCE FOR EUROPE TO PROTECT CHRISTIAN CULTURAL HERITAGE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 6 MARCH 2018 PROGRAMME OPENING MESSAGES • György Hölvényi MEP, Co-Chairman of the Working Group on Intercultural and Religious Dialogue of the EPP Group • Jan Olbrycht MEP, Co-Chairman of the Working Group on Intercultural and Religious Dialogue of the EPP Group • Metropolitan Athenagoras of Belgium on behalf of Committee of Representatives of the Orthodox Churches to the European Union (CROCEU) SESSION I THE PROTECTION OF MONUMENTS AS PART OF THE LIVE EUROPEAN CULTURAL HERITAGE Chair: Cristian Dan Preda MEP, EPP Group Coordinator for Foreign Affairs INTERVENTIONS • Christodoulos Hadjichristodoulou, Byzantinologist, Curator of Bank of Cyprus Cultural Foundation, Church of Cyprus • Svetoslav Hristov Malinov MEP • Ionuţ Bursuc, Expert-manager in Restoration Projects, Patriarchate of Romania SESSION II THE SPIRITUAL DIMENSIONS OF THE CHRISTIAN HERITAGE VIA EDUCATION Chair: Reverend Protopresbyter Dr. Georgios Lekkas, Advisor of the Representation Office of the Church of Greece in E.U. INTERVENTIONS • Bishop Kyrillos of Abydos, Ecumenical Patriarchate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Europaparlamentet 2019–2024
    Europaparlamentet 2019–2024 Utskottet för miljö, folkhälsa och livsmedelssäkerhet ENVI_PV(2020)0305_1 PROTOKOLL från sammanträdet den 5 mars 2020 kl. 9.30–12.30 BRYSSEL Sammanträdet öppnades torsdagen den 5 mars 2020 kl. 9.40 med utskottets ordförande, Pascal Canfin, som ordförande. 1. Godkännande av föredragningslistan ENVI_OJ(2020)0305_1 Föredragningslistan godkändes i den form som framgår av detta protokoll. 2. Meddelanden från ordföranden Ordföranden meddelade följande: Tolkning: Tolkningen motsvarade utskottets normala språkprofil: 21 språk tolkades med undantag för estniska, maltesiska och iriska. Elektroniska sammanträdeshandlingar/webbsändning: Ordföranden informerade om att sammanträdeshandlingar som vanligt fanns tillgängliga i elektroniskt format via programmet för e-sammanträden och att sammanträdet skulle sändas på nätet. Rapport från ad hoc-delegationen till 25:e partskonferensen för FN:s ramkonvention om klimatförändringar i Madrid, Spanien, den 10– 14 december 2019: Ordföranden informerade om att sammanträdeshandlingarna innehöll rapporten från ad hoc-delegationen till 25:e partskonferensen för FN:s ramkonvention om klimatförändringar i Madrid, Spanien, den 10– 14 december 2019. PV\1204450SV.docx PE650.672v01-00 SV Förenade i mångfaldenSV 3. Meddelanden från ordföranden om samordnarnas rekommendationer av den 18 februari 2020 Ordföranden meddelade att samordnarnas rekommendationer av den 18 februari 2020 hade skickats ut elektroniskt, och att de, eftersom inga invändningar lagts fram, ansågs vara godkända (se bilaga
    [Show full text]
  • Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue De La Loi 170 1000 Brussels
    Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue de la Loi 170 1000 Brussels Brussels, 16th April 2021 Dear Mr. High Representative; Mr Vice-President of the Commission: A delegation from the illegitimate National Assembly of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, which emerged from the electoral farce organised on 6th December 2020 by the regime of Nicolás Maduro, recently paid a visit to Brussels and was officially received by the institution you lead. According to a statement you made on behalf of the European Union on 6th December, this spurious process took place in the absence of electoral conditions that could have guaranteed its credibility, without any respect for political pluralism, and in an atmosphere of persecution and disqualification of democratic leaders whose legitimate rights were curtailed. Your statement concludes that such circumstances could not consider this process credible, inclusive, and transparent and therefore the results did not represent the will of the Venezuelan people. That initial statement was confirmed on 6 January of this year by a new declaration, in similar terms to those expressed on 6 December, and by the conclusions of the Foreign Affairs Council of 25 January. These reiterated the lack of recognition of the electoral process and regretted the behaviour of the authorities of the Maduro regime, whose actions are preventing a solution to the serious crisis in Venezuela. We were surprised and gravely concerned to learn that on 14th April, at your request, senior officials of the European External Action Service received the aforementioned delegation, comprising Iris Varela, Pedro Carreño and Desirée Santos Amaral, at the EEAS headquarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Dignity М Freedom М Human Rights
    Differences in the understanding of human dignity are born from the rejection by EU legislation of the religious element and DIGNITY – FREEDOM the laws of nature, which for Christians are essential sources of human dignity, freedom and human rights. The EU developed – HUMAN RIGHTS them mostly from the state endowment, and relative stability is not attributed to them. In reading the convergences and divergences in the understanding of these three fundamental The Role of the Catholic Church concepts of human dignity, freedom and human rights, a particular difficulty in dialogue with the EU comes from the in the European Integration Process language which we use to express our views. The terms dignity, freedom and human rights mean something completely different This publication contains the transcripts in both the Christian and Union contexts. This discrepancy arose from speeches and discussions during the conference because Christianity derives dignity, freedom and human rights in Krakow on 25-26 September 2015 from the truth, and this is the revealed truth, while the EU has adopted the principle of freedom as its source. [...] Bp Prof. Tadeusz Pieronek 0*%)$#$%0$ 8#*0$99: <$;9(&$ <<<=>*90(*4?$"#*6,=*#-=64 )"%.9 8,#&L 8,#4(,+$%& DIGNITY – FREEDOM HUMAN RIGHTS NBO ! M M 8 5 3 N 2 7 M B @ The Pontifical University The Robert Schuman The Konrad Adenauer The Group ‘Wokó³ nas’ European People’s Party Commission of John Paul II Foundation Foundation of the European People's Party Publishing House of
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament 2019-2024
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ITRE_PV(2019)0925_1 MINUTES Meeting of 25 September 2019, 9.00-12.30 and 14.30-18.30 BRUSSELS 25 September 2019, 9.00 – 10.00 In camera 1. Coordinators’ meeting The Coordinators’ meeting was held from 9.00 to 10.00 in camera with Adina-Ioana Vălean (Chair) in the chair. (See Annex I) * * * The meeting opened at 10.04 on Wednesday, 25 September 2019, with Adina-Ioana Vălean (Chair) presiding. 2. Adoption of agenda The agenda was adopted. PV\1189744EN.docx PE641.355 EN United in diversityEN 3. Chair’s announcements Chair’s announcements concerning coordinators’ decisions of 3 September 2019. Chair has informed the Committee members that the Committee meeting of 7-8 October has been cancelled due to the Commissioner hearing. The next ITRE Committee meeting will take place on the 17 October 2019. 4. Approval of minutes of meetings 2-3 September 2019 PV – PE641.070v01-00 The minutes were approved. *** Electronic vote *** 5. Establishing the European Cybersecurity Industrial, Technology and Research Competence Centre and the Network of National Coordination Centres ITRE/9/01206 ***I 2018/0328(COD) COM(2018)0630 – C8-0404/2018 Rapporteur: Rasmus Andresen (Verts/ALE) Responsible: ITRE Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations The decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations was adopted: for: 49; against: 12; abstention: 2. (Due to technical issues, roll-call page is not available) 6. Labelling of tyres with respect to fuel efficiency and other essential parameters ITRE/9/01207 ***I 2018/0148(COD) COM(2018)0296 – C8-0190/2018 Rapporteur: Michał Boni Responsible: ITRE Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations The decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations was adopted: for: 56; against: 3; abstention: 4.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Urban Agenda at the Urban Forum “Cities
    April 2014 - 13th issue NEWSLETTERhttp://urban-intergroup.eu ear partners, dear colleagues, this 13th newsletter of the URBAN “DIntergroup is the last one of this term. I was very pleased to chair the UR- BAN Intergroup over the last five years. I think that we should be proud of what we have achieved together during this half a decade. All along this term, we welcomed in our Intergroup MEPs from most of EU Mem- ber States, all political groups and almost all committees. We also got support from new partners – culminating at 83 – from local, regional, national and European level that represent the interests of Europe’s town and cities or work in the domain relevant for urban development.” Jan Olbrycht President of the URBAN Intergroup ver the past five years, we organised no less than 27 conferences and over 30 “Omeetings, concerning issues such as transports, housing, biodiversity, culture, sustainable development or urban planning. Members of the URBAN Intergroup fol- lowed closely what was happening in their respective committees in the European Parliament. They reported on latest developments and defended urban related issues in various fields. Moreover, our members and partners were deeply involved in the negotiations of the EU post 2013 cohesion policy, especially concerning the urban ele- ments in the structural funds’ regulations. Finally, we are very proud to have initiated two preparatory actions: “RURBAN”, which aimed at improving urban-rural partner- ships, and “World cities: EU-third countries cooperation on urban development”, cur- rently still under preparation. We also followed closely the symbolic change of name of the Directorate-General for Regional Policy (DG REGIO) and welcomed the addition of “Urban Policy”.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Ranking of Meps in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament
    Who has the critical vote? Power ranking of MEPs in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament A. Kovacs¹; I. Fertő²; L. Kóczy²; B. Sziklai²; A.A. Nás² 1: Tec de Monterrey, Department of International Business, Mexico, 2: Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Economics, Hungary Corresponding author email: [email protected] Abstract: We analyze the voting power of the members of the agricultural committee of the European Parliament using a spatial Banzhaf power index. Using a novel dataset of roll-call votes in the current EP-term, we identify critical members whose votes are necessary to form winning coalitions. We found that committee members with formal positions, EP group coordinators as well as German, French, Italian and British members are powerful actors. Nevertheless, rapporteurs are not necessarily influential. We also concluded that members with moderate ideological position but from Member States with extreme agricultural importance are the most powerful ones. Acknowledegment: JEL Codes: C71, A12 #1419 Who has the critical vote? Power ranking of MEPs in the Agricultural Committee of the European Parliament Abstract We analyze the voting power of the members of the agricultural committee of the European Parliament using a spatial Banzhaf power index. Using a novel dataset of roll-call votes in the current EP-term, we identify critical members whose votes are necessary to form winning coalitions. We found that committee members with formal positions, EP group coordinators as well as German, French, Italian and British members are powerful actors. Nevertheless, rapporteurs are not necessarily influential. We also concluded that members with moderate ideological position but from Member States with extreme agricultural importance are the most powerful ones.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • PROVISIONAL LIST of PARTICIPANTS As of 21 October 2017
    PROVISIONAL LIST OF PARTICIPANTS as of 21 October 2017 AUSTRIA Bischof Dr. Michael BÜNKER AB Lutheran Bishop of Austria H.E. Mr. Alfons M. KLOSS Ambassador of Austria to the Holy See Mr Lukas MANDL State Parliament Member Sr. Beatrix MAYRHOFER Präsidentin der Vereinigung der Frauenorden Österreichs Dr. Gabriele MOSER State Parliament Member Ms. Evelyn REGNER Member of the European Parliament DDr. Severin RENOLDNER Theologian, former State Parliament Member DDr. Peter SCHIPKA General Secretary of the Austrian Bishops' Conference S.E.R. Mons. D. Aloïs SCHWARZ Bishop of Gurk-Klagenfurt Dr. Irmfried SCHWIMANN European Commission S.E.R. Mons. Ägidius ZSIFKOVICS Bishop of Eisenstadt, Delegate to COMECE BELGIUM S.E. Le Comte J. CORNET d'ELZIUS Ambassadeur de Belgique près le Saint Siège Mr Gilles de KERCHOVE Counter-Terrorism Coordinator for the European Union Prof. Vincent DUJARDIN President of the Institut d’études européennes at the Catholic University of Louvain (UCL) Most Rev. Fr. Franck JANIN President of the Conference of European Provincials S.E.R. Mons. Jean KOCKEROLS Auxiliary Bishop of the Diocese of Mechelen-Brussels, COMECE First Vice-President Mr Philippe LAMBERTS Co-Chairman of the Greens–European Free Alliance in the European Parliament Dr. Pieter-Jan MEERSMANN Ambassade de Belgique près le Saint Siège Mgr. Dirk SMET Conseiller, Ambassade de Belgique près le Saint Siège Mr Enrico TRAVERSA European Commission Mr Steven VANACKERE former Deputy Prime Minister, former Minister of Foreign Affairs Ms Katrien VERHEGGE Director general of Kind en Gezin BULGARIA H.E. Prof. Vladimir GRADEV Former Ambassador of Bulgaria to the Holy See, Professor of Philosophy at the University of Sofia.
    [Show full text]
  • From Understanding to Cooperation Promoting Interfaith Encounters to Meet Global Challenges
    20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS FROM UNDERSTANDING TO COOPERATION PROMOTING INTERFAITH ENCOUNTERS TO MEET GLOBAL CHALLENGES Zagreb, 7 - 8 December 2017 20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS / 3 PROGRAMME 10:00-12:30 hrs / Sessions I and II The role of religion in European integration process: expectations, potentials, limits Wednesday, 6 December 10:00-11:15 hrs Session I 20.30 hrs. / Welcome Reception hosted by the Croatian Delegation / Memories and lessons learned during 20 years of Dialogue Thursday, 7 December Co-Chairs: György Hölvényi MEP and Jan Olbrycht MEP, Co-Chairmen of 09:00 hrs / Opening the Working Group on Intercultural Activities and Religious Dialogue György Hölvényi MEP and Jan Olbrycht MEP, Co-Chairmen of the Working Opening message: Group on Intercultural Activities and Religious Dialogue Dubravka Šuica MEP, Head of Croatian Delegation of the EPP Group Alojz Peterle MEP, former Responsible of the Interreligious Dialogue Welcome messages Interventions - Mairead McGuinness, First Vice-President of the European Parliament, - Gordan Jandroković, Speaker of the Croatian Parliament responsible for dialogue with religions (video message) - Joseph Daul, President of the European People’ s Party - Joseph Daul, President of the European People’ s Party - Vito Bonsignore, former Vice-Chairman of the EPP Group responsible for - Andrej Plenković, Prime Minister of Croatia Dialogue with Islam - Mons. Prof. Tadeusz Pieronek, Chairman of the International Krakow Church Conference Organizing Committee - Stephen Biller, former EPP Group Adviser responsible for Interreligious Dialogue Discussion 20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS / 5 4 /20TH ANNUAL EPP GROUP INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE WITH CHURCHES AND RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS 11:15-12:30 hrs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethical Dimension of Politics
    […] The eleventh Krakow conference, held in September 2011 The Ethical Dimension of Politics in Tomaszowice, near Krakow, concerned a topic that is difficult and has been annually postponed – that of the ethical dimension of politics. Its aim was to draw a conclusion based on thoughts from the previous conference, during which the contribution The Role of the Catholic Church of Christians in the process of European integration was discussed. This time it was a matter of defining what role Christian politicians in the European Integration Process have to fulfil in this process, especially those who as part of its structure and decision-making bodies bear responsibility for its shape, which includes its ethical shape. This is not a simple task because it is in a way an account This publication contains the transcripts of conscience for these politicians, who often face ethical dilem- from speeches and discussions during the conference mas, and who establish the guidelines for many aspects of the lives in Krakow on 9-10 September 2011 of European citizens, who profess different faiths and worldviews; people who invoke their conscience, which is shaped by principles that are often at odds with those recognised by others. […] Bp. Prof. Tadeusz Pieronek The Ethical Dimension of Politics Gliwice 2012 nas’ Publishing House ’Wokó³ The Ethical Dimension of Politics The Role of the Catholic Church in the European Integration Process This publication contains the transcripts from speeches and discussions
    [Show full text]
  • 10.4.2019 A8-0029/114 Amendment 114 Róża Gräfin Von Thun Und Hohenstein, Olga Sehnalová, Dita Charanzová, Kateřina Konečn
    10.4.2019 A8-0029/114 Amendment 114 Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein, Olga Sehnalová, Dita Charanzová, Kateřina Konečná, Biljana Borzan, Julia Reda, Julia Pitera, Tadeusz Zwiefka, Janusz Lewandowski, Dariusz Rosati, Jan Olbrycht, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Danuta Maria Hübner, Bogusław Sonik, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Jarosław Kalinowski, Michał Boni, Antanas Guoga, Petras Auštrevičius, Agnieszka Kozłowska-Rajewicz, Adam Szejnfeld, Marek Plura, Barbara Kudrycka, Dubravka Šuica, Ivana Maletić, Željana Zovko, Marijana Petir, Krzysztof Hetman, Jerzy Buzek, Emil Radev, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Janusz Zemke, Krystyna Łybacka, Adam Gierek, Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski, Eduard Kukan, Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Michaela Šojdrová, Tomáš Zdechovský, Renate Weber, Robert Rochefort, Momchil Nekov, Sergei Stanishev, Georgi Pirinski, Emilian Pavel, Peter Kouroumbashev, Maria Grapini, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Wajid Khan, Luigi Morgano, Maria Noichl, Davor Škrlec, Ruža Tomašić, Jozo Radoš, Tonino Picula, Ivo Vajgl, Tanja Fajon, Miriam Dalli, Pavel Poc, Jan Keller, Monika Beňová, Boris Zala, Miltiadis Kyrkos, Martina Dlabajová, Miroslav Poche, Igor Šoltes, Petr Ježek, Filiz Hyusmenova, Monika Smolková, Vladimír Maňka, Jiří Maštálka, Jaromír Kohlíček, Stefan Eck, Luke Ming Flanagan, Gabriele Zimmer, Marie-Pierre Vieu, Miguel Viegas, João Pimenta Lopes, João Ferreira, Anja Hazekamp, Martin Schirdewan, Paloma López Bermejo, Cornelia Ernst, Takis Hadjigeorgiou, Helmut Scholz, Marina Albiol Guzmán, Mihai Ţurcanu, Jiří Pospíšil, Stanislav
    [Show full text]
  • The Seanad Special Select Committee on the Withdrawal of the UK from the EU Interim Report on the Impacts of Brexit July 2021 33/Seanadwukeu/001
    Roghchoiste Speisialta an tSeanaid um an Ríocht Aontaithe do Tharraingt Siar as an Aontach Eorpach Tuarascáil Eatramhach ar Éifeachtaí Brexit Iúil 2021 The Seanad Special Select Committee on the Withdrawal of the UK from the EU Interim Report on the Impacts of Brexit July 2021 33/SeanadWUKEU/001 Ohh Tithe an Oireachtais Roghchoiste Speisialta an tSeanaid um an Ríocht Aontaithe do Tharraingt Siar as an Aontach Eorpach Tuarascáil eatramhach ar éifeachtaí Brexit Iúil 2021 ____________________________ Houses of the Oireachtas Seanad Special Select Committee on the Withdrawal of the UK from the EU Interim report on the impacts of Brexit July 2021 33/SeanadWUKEU/001 Contents Cathaoirleach’s Foreword ....................................................................................................................... 1 stalishent o ecial Committee ...................................................................................................... 2 acground and revious reorts ........................................................................................................... 2 EU- rade and Cooperation greement TC) ................................................................................... 3 Protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland .............................................................................................. 3 Committee ngagements ........................................................................................................................ 4 Ke themes.............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]