sign in sign up
<<
Home , Mellitic acid, Molecule, Organic compound

What is an Organic Substance?

Lee J. Silverberg

Pennsylvania State University, 200 University Drive, Schuylkill Haven, PA, 17972

[email protected]

ABSTRACT

No exact definition of an “organic” substance has been agreed upon by the chemical and textbook definitions vary substantially. The question of what exactly constitutes an “organic” substance is explored in this paper.

GRAPHIC ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS organic, inorganic, organometallic, , INTRODUCTION

In the early history of modern , compounds that came from living things were thought to contain a “vital force” and were referred to as “organic” while those that were from nonliving materials such as were called “inorganic.”1 It was believed that “inorganic” compounds could not be converted into “organic” compounds. This was disproven by Wöhler in 1828, when he converted to .2 This, of course, rendered this nomenclatural distinction obsolete.

However, in the 191 years since Wöhler’s discovery, the distinction between “organic” and “inorganic” substances has not been agreed upon. The IUPAC does not give definitions of “inorganic” or “organic,” and in fact states that “the boundaries between ‘organic’ and ‘inorganic’ compounds are blurred.”3 This is rather surprising when one considers all the areas of nomenclature in which IUPAC does set out precise guidelines. Nonetheless, one recent first-year undergraduate text notes that “a single, precise definition” of an “has yet to be identified by the chemistry community.”4

Second-year textbooks typically begin by introducing the field to be studied by attempting to define it. Clearly, the definition is considered important pedagogically, however, it seems to be mainly a of opinion. This can be seen to be true by the various definitions of “organic” substances found in first- and second-year undergraduate textbooks, some examples of which include: a)

“;”1 (b) compounds “composed primarily of carbon and ,” a definition that

“leaves considerable room for interpretation;”5 c) “compounds that contain carbon and hydrogen, although many organic compounds... do not contain hydrogen;”6 d) “carbon-containing…” including “hydrogen

7 (H2) – a kind of honorary organic even though it doesn’t contain carbon;” e) “compounds of carbon, specifically, those that contain hydrogen and often , , and a few other elements;” 8 f) “carbon-containing compounds;” except for “a few compounds… such as its and ;” 9 g) “any compound of carbon other than a , bicarbonate, , cyanate, , or gaseous ;”10 h) “carbon compounds” except for “certain carbon compounds which are obtained from sources… These are…” carbonates, bicarbonates, , , and oxides;11 and i) those that

“contain one or more carbon ” except for “substances such as , , , , and carbonate” which “are derived from minerals and have typical inorganic properties.”12

Thus, it can be seen that certain carbon-containing substances have been considered “inorganic” primarily because either a) they are sourced from minerals, which really is following the old pre-Wöhler definition of “inorganic;” or b) do not contain hydrogen. These exceptions do not base the distinction on chemical properties of the carbon in the substance, but simply on source or empirical .

But why does this matter? The language of chemistry is important.13 A pdf download of the latest IUPAC

“Gold Book” (Compendium of Chemical Terminology), a book of definitions used in chemistry, is a whopping 1670 pages.14 The latest IUPAC “Blue Book” (Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry) print edition is 1568 pages,15 while the most recent “Red Book” (Nomenclature of ) adds another 378 pages.16 There are other “color books” as well, but just sticking to those pertinent to

“organic” and “inorganic” chemistry, there is a total of 3616 pages dedicated to helping be very clear when communicating.

Still, in all this there is no clear definition of “organic” that we can teach to students. Further, this is not only important specifically to the two fields of “organic” and “inorganic” chemistry, but also to cross- disciplinary fields involving these. For example, “organometallic” compounds have been defined as those with “-carbon bonds,” whereas in a “metal-organic compound… the organic fragment is bound only by metal- bonds.”17 Both are compounds with an “interaction between inorganic metal species and organic .”17 Thus the identification of a compound as “organometallic” or

“metal-organic” also relies on knowing what is or isn’t an “organic” substance. In the discussion below, various carbon-containing substances that have been by some considered to be

“inorganic” are examined in an attempt to ascertain whether carbon in these compounds behaves differently than what is expected of carbon in an “organic” substance.

DISCUSSION

Allotropes of Carbon is a planar sheet of interconnected, conjugated sp2 .18 It possesses .19,20 The basal (interior) carbons undergo addition reactions across C=C, although high are required. The edge carbons, which are more tetrahedral and more reactive, can form benzyne or intermediates.21

Graphite is comprised of sheets of graphene stacked on top of each other. Graphite looks like a mineral, and is often considered “inorganic.”22 This view is perhaps bolstered by the fact that many intercalation compounds, in which a material is sandwiched in between graphene layers, are known. 23 However, graphite reacts with strong oxidizing agents to produce mellitic (Figure 1). 24 Higher polyaromatic (PAHs) similarly undergo oxidation to give . 25 In another example,

“aging” of graphite in humid air produces and carboxylic .26

CO2H HO2C CO2H

HO2C CO2H CO2H

Figure 1. Mellitic acid.

Carbon is comprised of “concentrically arranged, graphite-like crystallites… which can be considered as a highly disordered form of graphitic carbon. By heating to 3,000 °C under inert conditions it develops into an ordered graphitic formation.”27 There are various oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface, which “react in a similar way as the corresponding groups of the (sic) organic chemistry do.”28

The curved allotropes known as are also networks of sp2 carbons, although each is somewhat pyramidalized due to the curvature of the molecule. The molecules react mainly by addition reactions to relieve the strain.29-33 York has discussed the chemistry of “inorganic fullerenes” – those comprised of elements other than carbon; this implies carbon fullerenes are “organic.”34

Diamond, one of the hardest materials known,35,36 is a network of tetrahedral sp3 carbons, held together in a rigid structure of six-membered rings. Each carbon is quaternary. With only σ bonds, no functional groups, no strain, and all carbons being very hindered, it is not surprising that diamond is very unreactive.37

Other Mineral-like Carbon Compounds

Covalent (SiC) is made up of sp3 silicon and carbon atoms, each with four bonds, and is

38 very hard, like diamond. Ionic calcium carbide (CaC2) contains two sp-hydridized carbons in an

39 acetylide dianion and behaves as such; addition of D2O to calcium carbide gives deuterated .

The transition metal carbides (TMCs) are less clear-cut because of the bulk of many of the materials,40 but display M-C bonding whether the carbon is “interstitial” or part of a more complex

41 17 structure such as in Fe3C, which would make them “organometallic.”

2+ 2- + - 2 In metal carbonates, e.g. Ca (CO3 ), and bicarbonates, M (HCO3 ), the carbon is sp -hybridized and bonded to three . The carbonate and bicarbonate are deprotonated forms of carbonic acid

(H2CO3), which by prior definitions is “organic.” The bicarbonate is part of the bicarbonate buffer system that regulates the pH of blood plasma.42 Calcium carbonate is the primary component of eggshells43 and seashells.44

The cyanide ion (-CN) is an sp-hybridized carbanion and is very commonly used as a in substitution reactions,45 a subject taught in second-year undergraduate organic chemistry. The cyanate ion

- 46 ( O-C≡N) can act as a nucleophile in SN1 or SN2 reactions to give or , respectively.

Carbido Clusters

Metal carbido clusters are known in which 5- or 6-coordinate carbon can be found. 17,47 This might be surprising to an organic and something confined specifically to compounds where carbon is interacting with transition . However, in 2017 chemists isolated and obtained an x-ray

2+ crystallographic structure of C6(CH3)6 , an ion with a six-coordinate carbon connected only to other carbons.48

Carbon Oxides and carbon dioxide are both at standard and pressure, so they are not mineral-like in appearance, but they do lack hydrogen. However, they also are found within living systems.49

Carbon monoxide (CO) is an unusual neutral carbon compound in that it has a on the sp- hybridized carbon. It will form M-C bonds with many transition metals; transition metal carbonyls are considered “organometallic”17 and can act as catalysts in of “organic” compounds, for example in the Reppe hydroformylation reaction in which CO is a reactant and Fe(CO)5 is a catalyst

(Scheme 1).17 KOH R R + 3CO + 2H2O + 2CO2 Fe(CO)5 OH 100 C 15 atm

Scheme 1. Reppe reaction (hydroformylation).17

Carbon dioxide (CO2) also has an sp-hybridized carbon, which is electrophilic, as expected of a carbonyl.

It undergoes many reactions with to give organic products.50 It can, for example, form a complex with bases such as diazabicycloundecene (DBU), which can then be used to form N- alkylcarbamates (Scheme 2).51 Second-year undergraduate organic chemistry texts commonly include the reaction of Grignard reagents with CO2.

NH 2 H + O N N N O C + N N O I O - O O CH3CN

51 Scheme 2. Formation of N-alkylcarbamates using DBU-CO2 complex.

Lack of Hydrogen Many other carbonaceous molecules have no but display typical “organic” behavior. For example, (CCl4) is a “suitable organic in different organic reactions,” and can be used as an electrophilic chlorinating agent in reactions with carbanions.52 Another important example is tetrafluoroethylene (F2C=CF2), the used to make polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) via free- radical polymerization, a standard organic mechanism. PTFE is “the most chemically resistant thermoplastic available.”53

CONCLUSION Currently, although we use the terms “organic” and “inorganic,” the definitions are fuzzy to say the least.

However, based on the evidence in the literature, it can be seen that carbon atoms, whether part of an allotrope, , , purely covalent compound, metal carbide, or transition metal complex, display the same fundamental chemical behavior. It is suggested here that it is appropriate therefore to consider all carbon-containing substances “organic,” at least in part. Transition metal complexes can be considered as being “organometallic,” or “metal-organic.” When carbon is part of an , it can be viewed as a salt of an “organic ion.” Compounds that do not contain carbon would be considered

“inorganic.” These definitions would clarify what chemists mean when using these terms, and increase understanding when chemists communicate, whether to each other, students, or the general public.

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information

None.

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author is indebted to Drs. Paul Fishbein, Kevin Cannon, John Tierney, Stuart Cantrill, Stephen

Davey, and David Rovnyak for their insightful commentary on the manuscript, to the chemists who visited the poster at the 2018 BCCE and discussed it with me, and to Caroline Silverberg for the artwork in the Graphic Abstract.

REFERENCES 1. McMurry, J. Organic Chemistry, 9th ed. Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, 2016, p. 2.

2. Wöhler, F. Ann. Phys Chem. 1828, 88 (2), 253–256. DOI: 10.1002/andp.18280880206 3. Hartshorn, R. M.; Hellwich, K.; Yerin, A.; Damhus, T.; Hutton, A. T. Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87 (9-

10), 1039-1049. DOI: 10.1515/pac-2014-0718

4. Flowers, P.; Theopold, K.; Langley, R. Chemistry. OpenStax College: Houston, 2015, p. 1127.

5. Karty, J. Organic Chemistry: Principles and Mechanisms. W. W. Norton: New York, NY, 2014, p. 13.

6. Burdge, J.; Overby, J. Chemistry: Atoms First, 1st ed. McGraw Hill: New York, NY, 2012, pp. G6, 158.

7. Jones Jr., M.; Fleming, S. A. Organic Chemistry, 5th ed. W. W. Norton: New York, NY, 2014, pp. xxxi- xxxii.

8. Silberberg, M. S. Chemistry: The Molecular Nature of Matter and Change, 6th ed. McGraw Hill: New

York, NY, 2012, p. 55.

9. Zumdahl, S. S.; Zumdahl, S. A. Chemistry: An Atoms First Approach, 1st ed. Brooks/Cole: Belmont,

CA, 2012, p. 980.

10. Jesperson, N. D; Brady, J. E.; Hyslop, A. Chemistry: The Molecular Nature of Matter, 6th ed. John

Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, 2012, pp. 86, G13.

11. Madan, R. L. Organic Chemistry. Tate McGraw Hill Education: New Dehli, 2013, p. 2.

12. Wade, Jr., L. G. Organic Chemistry, 8th ed. Pearson Education: New York, NY, 2013, p. 2.

13. Mosher, M. D. Chem. Eng. News 2017, 95(43), 33.

14. Miloslav Nic, M.; Jirat, J.; Kosata, B. IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology (Gold Book),

Version 2.3.3, 2014. https://goldbook.iupac.org/pages/about.html (accessed Sep. 2017).

15. Favre, Henri A. and Powell, Warren H. Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry. IUPAC

Recommendations and Preferred Name 2013. Cambridge, UK: The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2013.

16. Connelly, N. G.; Damhus, T.; Hartshorn, R. M.; Hutton, A. T. Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry:

IUPAC Recommendations 2005. Cambridge, UK: The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2005.

17. Crabtree, R. H. The of the Transition Metals, 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons:

Hoboken, NJ, 2005, pp. 1, 87-90, 361-362.

18. Allen, M. A.; Tung, V. C.; Kaner, R. B. Chem. Rev. 2010, 111 (1), 132-145. DOI: 10.1021/cr900070d 19. Popov, I. A.; Bozhenko, K. V.; Boldyrev, A. I. Nano Res. 2012, 5 (2), 117-123. DOI: 10.1007/s12274-

011-0192-z

20. Zdetsis, A. D.; Economou, E. N. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119 (29), 16991-17003. DOI:

10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b04311

21. Wang, X.; Shi, G. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17 (43), 28484-28504. DOI: 10.1039/C5CP05212B

22. Alyea, H. N. Frick, C; Colo. A. J. J. Chem. Educ. 1968, 45 (3), A225. DOI: 10.1021/ed045pA225.2

23. Enoki, T.; Suzuki, M.; Endo, M. Graphite Intercalation Compounds and Applications. Oxford

University Press: Oxford, 2003.

24. Juettner, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1937, 59 (10), 208-213. DOI: 10.1021/ja01280a052

25. Benner, S. A.; Devine, K. G.; Matveeva, L. N.; Powell, D. H. PNAS 2000, 97 (6), 2425-2430. DOI:

10.1073/pnas.040539497

26. Boehm, H. P. Carbon 2012, 50 (9), 3154-3157. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.10.013

27. What is Carbon Black? Orion Engineered Carbons brochure, 2015. https://www.thecarycompany.com/media/pdf/specs/orion-what-is-carbon-black.pdf (accessed Oct. 2017).

28. Donnet, J. B. Carbon, 1982, 20, 267-282. DOI: 10.1016/0008-6223(82)90002-1

29. Yamada, M.; Akasaka, T.; Nagase, S. Chem. Rev. 2013, 133 (10), 7209-7264. DOI:

10.1021/cr3004955

30. Bühl, M.; Hirsch, A. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101 (5), 1153-1183. DOI: 10.1021/cr990332q

31. Balch, A. L.; Olmstead, M. M. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98 (6), 2123-2165. DOI: 10.1021/cr960040e

32. Matsuo, Y., Nakamura, E. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108 (8), 3016-3028. DOI: 10.1021/cr0684218

33. Tzirakis, M. D.; Orfanopoulos, M. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113 (7), 5262-5321. DOI: 10.1021/cr300475r

34. York, A. P. E. J. Chem. Educ. 2004, 81 (5), 673-676. DOI: 10.1021/ed081p673

35. Kraus, E. H.; Slawson, C. B. Am. Mineral. 1939, 24 (11), 661-676.

36. Pan, Z.; Sun, H.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102 (5), (055503-1)-(055503-4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.055503 37. Rossini, F. D.; Jessup, R. S. J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. (U. S.) 1939, 21 (4), 491-513. DOI:

10.6028/jres.021.028

38. Pedersen, H.; Leone, S.; Kordina, O.; Henry, A.; Nishizawa, S.; Koshka, Y.; Janzén, E. Chem. Rev.

2012, 112 (4), 2434-2453. DOI: 10.1021/cr200257z

39. Hansen, P. E.; Nicolaisen, F. M.; Schaumburg, K. J. Am Chem. Soc. 1986, 108 (4), 625-629. DOI:

10.1021/ja00264a011

40. Hwu, H. H.; Chen, J. G. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105 (1), 185-212. DOI: 10.1021/cr0204606

41. Häglund, J.; Guillermet, A. F.; Grimvall, G.; Körling, M. Phys. Rev. B. 1993, 48 (6), 11685-11691.

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.11685

42. Krieg, B. J.; Taghavi, S. M.; Amidon, G. L.; Amidon, G. E. J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 103, 3473. DOI:

10.1002/jps.24108

43. Butcher, G. D; Miles, R. Concepts of Eggshell Quality, VM69, http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/vm013

(accessed June 2018).

44. Kinard, W. F. J. Chem. Educ. 1980, 57, 783. DOI: 10.1021/ed057p783

45. Smith, M. B.; March, J. March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry, 6th ed. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken,

NJ, 2007, pp. 648-650.

46. Holm, A.; Wentrup, C. Acta Chem. Scand. 1966, 20 (8), 2123-2127. DOI: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.20-

2123

47. Takemoto, S.; Matsuzaka, H. Coordination Chem. Rev. 2012, 256, 574-588. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.10.025

48. Malischewski, M.; Sepelt, K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 368-370. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201608795

49. Berg, J. M.; Tymoczko, J. L.; Stryer, L. , 5th ed. W. H. Freeman: New York, NY, 2001.

50. Sakakura, T.; Choi, J-C.; Yasuda, H. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107 (6), 2365-2387. DOI: 10.1021/cr068357u

51. Pérez, E. R.; Silva, M. O.; Costa, V. C.; Rodrigues-Filho, U. P.; Franco, D. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002,

43 (22), 4091-4093. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4039(02)00697-4

52. Abele, E.; Lukevics, E. Org. Prep. Proc. Int. 1999, 31 (4), 359-377. DOI: 10.1080/00304949909355726

53. Tetrafluoroethylene. http://www.rlhudson.com/tetrafuoroethylene.html (accessed Oct. 2017).