DOCSLIB.ORG

I-395/Route 9 Transportation Study. Appendices to the Final Environmental Impact Statement 2015 Maine Department of Transportation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I-395/Route 9 Transportation Study. Appendices to the Final Environmental Impact Statement 2015 Maine Department of Transportation Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 1-2015 I-395/Route 9 Transportation Study. Appendices to the Final Environmental Impact Statement 2015 Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Recommended Citation Maine Department of Transportation, "I-395/Route 9 Transportation Study. Appendices to the Final Environmental Impact Statement 2015" (2015). Transportation Documents. 92. https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs/92 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Transportation at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I-395/Route 9 Transportation Study Appendices to the Final Environmental Impact Statement Brewer, Holden, Eddington, and Clifton, Maine FHWA-ME-EIS-12-01-F MaineDOT Project Identification Number: 008483.20 FHWA: NH-8483(20)E January 2015 Submitted Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332 (2)(c) by the Federal Highway Administration and Cooperating Agencies U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration–National Marine Fisheries Service, Maine Department of Environmental Protection, and Maine Historic Preservation Commission Appendix A Responses to Substantive Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Page · 189 · THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK · Responses to Substantive Comments On the I-395/Route 9 Transportation Study Draft Environmental Impact Statement Brewer, Holden, Eddington, and Clifton, Maine FHWA-ME-EIS-14-01-D MaineDOT Project Identification Number: 008483.20 FHWA: NH-8483(20)E Submitted Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 4332 (2)(c) by the Federal Highway United States Army Administration Corps of Engineers and Cooperating Agencies U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration–National Marine Fisheries Service, Maine Department of Environmental Protection, and Maine Historic Preservation Commission Contents Introduction ...................................................1 Economic Environment ....................................... 29 Endangered and Threatened Species .............. 31 Exhibit 1- Summary of Substantive Environmental Impacts ....................................... 31 Comments ......................................................5 Farmland ................................................................ 31 Federal Agencies ......................................................5 FEIS ........................................................................... 31 State Agencies ..........................................................8 Future Development ............................................ 32 Regional and Local Entities ...................................8 Induced Development ......................................... 33 Interest Groups and Other Groups .......................9 Land Use .................................................................. 34 Special Business Interests .......................................9 Maps ........................................................................ 35 Public ....................................................................... 10 Mitigation ............................................................... 35 Public Hearing, May 2, 2012 ............................... 16 NEPA ......................................................................... 36 Noise ........................................................................ 36 Exhibit 2 - Responses to Substantive Permits ..................................................................... 37 Comments ....................................................18 Project Construction............................................. 37 Access Management ............................................ 18 Public Coordination ............................................. 37 Agency Coordination ........................................... 18 Road-Stream Crossings ....................................... 38 Alternatives ............................................................ 18 Safety ....................................................................... 38 Anti-Icing ................................................................ 25 Significant Habitat ............................................... 39 Community Facilities and Services ................... 26 Storm Water ........................................................... 40 Construction Impacts .......................................... 26 System Linkage ...................................................... 41 Cumulative Impacts ............................................. 27 Traffic ....................................................................... 42 East-West Highway ............................................... 28 Trail Access .............................................................. 44 Page · i Contents Vernal Pools ............................................................ 44 Water Resources .................................................... 46 Wildlife ..................................................................... 46 Zoning ..................................................................... 47 Index .............................................................49 Attachment ..................................................53 Page · ii Responses to Substantive Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement Under the CEQ’s regulations implementing NEPA identify factual errors, omissions, areas of controversy, (40 CFR Part 1503.1), an agency that publishes a DEIS and provide new information to be considered in the is required to: analysis of alternatives and prior to decision-making. An agency’s focus in preparing the FEIS is the con- • Obtain the comments of Federal agencies with sideration of and responses to these comments. The jurisdiction by law or special expertise, and comment-response process includes all steps from • Request comments from: receipt and consideration of comments through the x agencies at all levels of government autho- preparation of responses and any needed revisions to rized to develop and enforce environmental the EIS. An agency cannot complete the NEPA process standards until it has considered and responded to substantive x Indian tribes, when the effects may be on a comments on the DEIS in the FEIS. The comment- reservation response process is intended to help make better and x an agency that has requested EISs on ac- more informed decisions. tions of the kind proposed In early March 2012, MaineDOT mailed ap- x the public, including actively soliciting proximately 200 newsletters to property owners in the comments from those persons or organiza- study area advising them of the status of the study, the tions that may be interested or affected circulation of the DEIS, opportunities to pose ques- tions to MaineDOT and FHWA and receive answers, Comments received can range from statements of and provide comments. MaineDOT delivered ap- support for, or opposition to, an agency’s proposed proximately 250 copies of the newsletter to the City action to detailed critiques of the DEIS’s analyses and of Brewer and the towns of Holden, Eddington, and suggestions for new alternatives. Comments might Clifton for distribution. Page · 1 Responses to Substantive Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement From the March 2012 Newsletter Open Houses The public is invited and encouraged to comment April 4 3:00 to 8:00 p.m. Brewer Auditorium on the DEIS. Comments will be addressed when a May 2 1:00 to 4:30 p.m. Eddington Town Office Final EIS is published at a later date. MaineDOT and key agencies involved in the NEPA process have Public Hearing scheduled two open houses to provide members May 2 ~ 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. of the public with opportunities to learn about the Eddington Elementary School DEIS and the NEPA process, and to ask questions and share concerns directly with the federal and Next Steps state officials conducting the study. Following the While the formal public hearing will take place open houses and in accordance with the NEPA on May 2, 2012, the public comment period will process, there will be a formal public hearing. At continue through May 15. Comments received the hearing, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will during the comment period and at the public also receive comments on the Section 404 (Clean hearing will be summarized and addressed in the Water Act) permit application. Final EIS. The MaineDOT and the FHWA announced the Two open houses and a public hearing were held availability of the I-395/Route 9 Transportation Study during the 60-day comment period. The first open DEIS and Section 404 Permit Application Supporting house was on April 4, 2012 at the Brewer Auditorium Information on March 23, 2012 (Federal Register, Vol. and the second open house was on May 2, 2012 at the 77, No. 57). A 60-day comment period immediately Eddington Town Office. The purposes of the two open followed, during which MaineDOT and FHWA in- houses were to 1) meet with people with an interest in vited Federal, State and local agencies, Tribes, orga- the study to answer questions about the study and, 2) nizations, and individuals to submit comments on the receive suggestions for further avoidance and minimi- I-395/Route 9 Transportation Study DEIS and Section zation of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Case for Reconnecting Southeast Washington DC
    1 Reimagining DC 295 as a vital multi modal corridor: The Case for Reconnecting Southeast Washington DC Jonathan L. Bush A capstone thesis paper submitted to the Executive Director of the Urban & Regional Planning Program at Georgetown University’s School of Continuing Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for Masters of Professional Studies in Urban & Regional Planning. Faculty Advisor: Howard Ways, AICP Academic Advisor: Uwe S. Brandes, M.Arch © Copyright 2017 by Jonathan L. Bush All Rights Reserved 2 ABSTRACT Cities across the globe are making the case for highway removal. Highway removal provides alternative land uses, reconnects citizens and natural landscapes separated by the highway, creates mobility options, and serves as a health equity tool. This Capstone studies DC 295 in Washington, DC and examines the cases of San Francisco’s Embarcadero Freeway, Milwaukee’s Park East Freeway, New York City’s Sheridan Expressway and Seoul, South Korea’s Cheonggyecheon Highway. This study traces the history and the highway removal success using archival sources, news circulars, planning documents, and relevant academic research. This Capstone seeks to provide a platform in favor DC 295 highway removal. 3 KEYWORDS Anacostia, Anacostia Freeway, Anacostia River, DC 295, Highway Removal, I-295, Kenilworth Avenue, Neighborhood Planning, Southeast Washington DC, Transportation Planning, Urban Infrastructure RESEARCH QUESTIONS o How can Washington’s DC 295 infrastructure be modified to better serve local neighborhoods? o What opportunities
    [Show full text]
  • Gregor Weichbrodt on the Road 0X0a
    0x0a On the Road Gregor Weichbrodt On the Road Gregor Weichbrodt 0x0a © 2014 Gregor Weichbrodt All rights reserved. www.ggor.de CONTENTS About this book ........................ 5 Chapter 1 ............................... 7 Chapter 2 .............................. 23 Chapter 3 .............................. 41 Chapter 4 .............................. 53 ABOUT THIS BOOK Based on the novel “On the Road” by Jack Kerouac and Google Maps Direction Service. The exact and approximate spots Kerouac traveled and described are taken from the book and parsed by Google Direction Service API. The chapters match those of the original book. Gregor Weichbrodt January 2014 www.ggor.de 7 CHAPTER 1 Head northwest on W 47th St toward 7th Ave. Take the 1st left onto 7th Ave. Turn right onto W 39th St. Take the ramp onto Lincoln Tunnel. Parts of this road are closed Mon–Fri 4:00 – 7:00 pm. Entering New Jersey. Continue onto NJ-495 W. Keep right to continue on NJ-3 W, follow signs for New Jersey 3 W/Garden State Parkway/Secaucus. Take the New Jersey 3 W exit on the left toward Clifton. Merge onto NJ-3 W. Slight right onto the Garden State Pkwy N ramp. Merge onto Garden State Pkwy. Take exit 155P on the left to merge onto NJ-19 N toward I-80/ Paterson. Turn left onto Cianci St. Turn right onto Market St. Head west on Market St toward Washington St. Turn left onto Main St. Turn right onto County Rd 509 S. Take the Interstate 80 E ramp. Merge onto I-80 E. Take exit 62A-62B toward Saddle 9 Brook/Saddle River Rd/Garden State Pkwy.
    [Show full text]
  • Mainedot Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021 Maine Department of Transportation
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 2-2019 MaineDOT Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021 Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Recommended Citation Maine Department of Transportation, "MaineDOT Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021" (2019). Transportation Documents. 124. https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs/124 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Transportation at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MaineDOT Work Plan Calendar Years 2019-2020-2021 February 2019 February 21, 2019 MaineDOT Customers and Partners: On behalf of the 2,000 valued employees of the Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT), I am privileged to present this 2019 Edition of our Work Plan for the three Calendar Years 2019, 2020 and 2021. Implementation of this plan allows us to achieve our mission of responsibly providing our customers with the safest and most reliable transportation system possible, given available resources. Like all recent editions, this Work Plan includes all capital projects and programs, maintenance and operations activities, planning initiatives, and administrative functions. This plan contains 2,193 individual work items with a total value of $2.44 billion, consisting principally of work to be delivered or coordinated through MaineDOT, but also including funding and work delivered by other transportation agencies that receive federal funds directly including airports and transit agencies. Although I have the pleasure of presenting this plan, it is really the product of staff efforts dating back to the summer of last year.
    [Show full text]
  • Brewer Rail Trail Project
    Brewer Rail Trail Project Linda Johns President, Brewer Land Trust City Planner, City of Brewer September 1, 2016 The Brewer Land Trust is excited to initiate the creation of a Rail Trail through the City of Brewer! There is an inactive, overgrown portion of railroad (part of the Calais Branch Rail Line) from Wilson Street to approximately 1,000 feet easterly of Green Point Road which is approximately 2.12 miles in length. This rail bed directly abuts a 196-space City-owned parking lot, Maple Street Park, the City’s Public Safety building, an outdoor ice rink, and valuable wetland and wildlife habitats. Within a very short walk to the rail corridor, is the Brewer High School, an indoor ice arena, Brewer Auditorium, Brewer Library, and the City’s Riverwalk trail along the Penobscot River. This potential rail trail could be used by many for both recreational purposes as well as a transportation connection to other locations. Brewer has seen many more walkers and bicyclists as has the region. The Brewer High School students currently use the roads to run, which is not always the safest. This rail trail could create a loop using Dirigo Drive and Green Point Road from the school. Both the Brewer School Department and the City of Brewer would like to see this project constructed. This potential rail trail could also be a great addition to the East Coast Greenway, which is currently on-road through this portion of Brewer. There is a large wetland owned by the State next to the rail bed on Green Point Road where a variety of animals can be seen on almost any given day creating a great location for birdwatcherst.
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving Connecticut's Bridges Report Appendix
    Preserving Connecticut's Bridges Report Appendix - September 2018 Year Open/Posted/Cl Rank Town Facility Carried Features Intersected Location Lanes ADT Deck Superstructure Substructure Built osed Hartford County Ranked by Lowest Score 1 Bloomfield ROUTE 189 WASH BROOK 0.4 MILE NORTH OF RTE 178 1916 2 9,800 Open 6 2 7 2 South Windsor MAIN STREET PODUNK RIVER 0.5 MILES SOUTH OF I-291 1907 2 1,510 Posted 5 3 6 3 Bloomfield ROUTE 178 BEAMAN BROOK 1.2 MI EAST OF ROUTE 189 1915 2 12,000 Open 6 3 7 4 Bristol MELLEN STREET PEQUABUCK RIVER 300 FT SOUTH OF ROUTE 72 1956 2 2,920 Open 3 6 7 5 Southington SPRING STREET QUINNIPIAC RIVER 0.6 MI W. OF ROUTE 10 1960 2 3,866 Open 3 7 6 6 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 MARKET STREET & I-91 NB EAST END I-91 & I-84 INT 1961 4 125,700 Open 5 4 4 7 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 EB AMTRAK;LOCAL RDS;PARKING EASTBOUND 1965 3 66,450 Open 6 4 4 8 Hartford INTERSTATE-91 NB PARK RIVER & CSO RR AT EXIT 29A 1964 2 48,200 Open 5 4 4 9 New Britain SR 555 (WEST MAIN PAN AM SOUTHERN RAILROAD 0.4 MILE EAST OF RTE 372 1930 3 10,600 Open 4 5 4 10 West Hartford NORTH MAIN STREET WEST BRANCH TROUT BROOK 0.3 MILE NORTH OF FERN ST 1901 4 10,280 Open N 4 4 11 Manchester HARTFORD ROAD SOUTH FORK HOCKANUM RIV 2000 FT EAST OF SR 502 1875 2 5,610 Open N 4 4 12 Avon OLD FARMS ROAD FARMINGTON RIVER 500 FEET WEST OF ROUTE 10 1950 2 4,999 Open 4 4 6 13 Marlborough JONES HOLLOW ROAD BLACKLEDGE RIVER 3.6 MILES NORTH OF RTE 66 1929 2 1,255 Open 5 4 4 14 Enfield SOUTH RIVER STREET FRESHWATER BROOK 50 FT N OF ASNUNTUCK ST 1920 2 1,016 Open 5 4 4 15 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 EB BROAD ST, I-84 RAMP 191 1.17 MI S OF JCT US 44 WB 1966 3 71,450 Open 6 4 5 16 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 EAST NEW PARK AV,AMTRAK,SR504 NEW PARK AV,AMTRAK,SR504 1967 3 69,000 Open 6 4 5 17 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 WB AMTRAK;LOCAL RDS;PARKING .82 MI N OF JCT SR 504 SB 1965 4 66,150 Open 6 4 5 18 Hartford I-91 SB & TR 835 CONNECTICUT SOUTHERN RR AT EXIT 29A 1958 5 46,450 Open 6 5 4 19 Hartford SR 530 -AIRPORT RD ROUTE 15 422 FT E OF I-91 1964 5 27,200 Open 5 6 4 20 Bristol MEMORIAL BLVD.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth Transportation Board Shannon Valentine 1401 East Broad Street (804) 786-2701 Chairperson Richmond, Virginia 23219 Fax: (804) 786-2940
    Commonwealth Transportation Board Shannon Valentine 1401 East Broad Street (804) 786-2701 Chairperson Richmond, Virginia 23219 Fax: (804) 786-2940 Agenda Item # 6 RESOLUTION OF THE COMMONWEALTH TRANSPORTATION BOARD January 16, 2019 MOTION Made By: Ms. Hynes, Seconded By: Mr. Kasprowicz Action: Motion Carried, Unanimously Title: Designation of the I-95 Express Lanes Fredericksburg Extension as HOT Lanes and Authorization for the Commissioner of Highways to Enter into an Updated Memorandum of Understanding with the Federal Highway Administration Concerning Tolling of the I-95 HOV/HOT Lanes, as Extended. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Public-Private Transportation Act of 1995 (the “PPTA”), (Va. Code §§ 33.2-1800, et seq.), the Virginia Department of Transportation (the “Department”) may allow private entities to develop and/or operate qualifying transportation facilities; and WHEREAS, on July 31, 2012, pursuant to the PPTA, the Department and 95 Express Lanes, LLC entered into a comprehensive agreement (the “Comprehensive Agreement”) relating to the I-95 HOV/HOT Lanes Project to develop, design, finance, construct, maintain, and operate 29 continuous miles of High Occupancy Toll (“HOT”) lanes on Interstates 95 and 395 between Turkeycock Run (milepost 2.0 on Interstate 395) and Garrisonville Road (VA Route 610) (the “Original 95 HOT Lanes”); and WHEREAS, on May 2, 2016, the Department entered into the First Amendment to the Comprehensive Agreement to extend the HOT lanes on Interstate 95 south 2.2 miles (near milepost 142.5 on Interstate 95) (the “I-95 Express Lanes Southern Terminus Extension”); and Resolution of the Board Designation of the I-95 Express Lanes Fredericksburg Extension as HOT Lanes January 16, 2019 Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, on June 8, 2017, the Department entered into the Amended and Restated Comprehensive Agreement (the “First ARCA”) to extend the HOT lanes on Interstate 395 for approximately 8 miles north to the Washington D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • CCPY Cultural Resources Technical Memo
    Crystal City / Potomac Yard Corridor Transit Improvements Project CULTURAL RESOURCES TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM October 2006 Cultural Resources Technical Memorandum Crystal City / Potomac Yard Corridor Transit Improvements Project Table of Contents Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................... 1 2.1 Project Purpose.................................................................................................................1 2.2 Background .......................................................................................................................1 2.3 Project Alignment Improvements .......................................................................................1 3.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ........................................................................... 3 4.0 ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES ....................................................................... 5 4.1 Methodology......................................................................................................................5 4.2 Area of Potential Effects ....................................................................................................5 4.3 Background Research .......................................................................................................7 4.4 Architectural Resources within the City of Alexandria.........................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore Report.P65
    EFFECTS OF CATASTROPHIC EVENTS ON TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS Baltimore, MD—Howard Street Tunnel Fire—July 18, 2001 July 2002 U.S. Department of Transportation ITS Joint Program Office Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. ii Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Effects of Catastrophic Events on Transportation System Management July 2002 and Operations, Howard Street Tunnel Fire, Baltimore City, Maryland – July 18, 2001 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Mark R. Carter, Mark P. Howard, Nicholas Owens, David Register, Jason Kennedy, Kelley Pecheux, Aaron Newton 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Science Applications International Corporation 7980 Science Applications Court 11. Contract or Grant No. Vienna, VA 22183 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered U.S. Department of Transportation Catastrophic Events Case Study Federal Highway Administration ITS Joint Program Office 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 400 Seventh Street, SW Washington, DC 20590 15. Supplementary Notes Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) – Joseph Peters 16. Abstract This report documents the actions taken by transportation agencies in response to the earthquake in Northridge, California on January 17, 1994, and is part of a larger effort to examine the impacts of catastrophic events on transportation system facilities and services. The findings documented in this report are a result of a detailed literature search on Northridge lessons learned.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of BREWER, MAINE Annual Financial Report for the Year Ended June 30, 2019
    CITY OF BREWER, MAINE Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended June 30, 2019 CITY OF BREWER, MAINE Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended June 30, 2019 Table of Contents Statement Page FINANCIAL SECTION Independent Auditor's Report 1 - 3 Management's Discussion and Analysis 4 - 10 Basic Financial Statements: Government-wide Financial Statements: Statement of Net Position 1 13 Statement of Activities 2 14 Fund Financial Statements: Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds 3 15 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances - Governmental Funds 4 16 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 5 17 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - General Fund (Budgetary Basis) 6 18 Statement of Net Position - Proprietary Funds 7 19 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Position - Proprietary Funds 8 20 Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds 9 21 Statement of Fiduciary Net Position - Fiduciary Funds 10 22 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position - Fiduciary Funds 11 23 Notes to Basic Financial Statements 24-58 Required Supplementary Information 59-66 Combining and Individual Fund Financial Statements and Schedule: Exhibit General Fund: Comparative Balance Sheets A-1 69 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual (Budgetary Basis) A-2 70-72 CITY OF BREWER, MAINE Annual Financial Report For the Year Ended June 30, 2019 Table
    [Show full text]
  • State Owned and Maintained Functionally Obsolete Bridges
    State Owned and Maintained Functionally Obsolete Bridges (4,016 bridges - includes NHS, Non-NHS, NBI, and Non-NBI) Most Travelled (sorted by ADT) Data is based on the condition data of our entire bridge inventory (both NBI and Non-NBI bridges) at the time of the 2018 NBI submittal to FHWA on 03/15/18, which included inspection condition data due in 2017 and the most recent inspection condition data at the time of the submittal NBI 112: NBIS Bridge Length NBI 29: Average Daily NBI 27: Year Built NBI 7: Facility Carried by NBI 6A: Feature Intersected: Narrative NBI 4: City or Town NBI 104: Highway System of the Inventory [Classification Traffic (ADT) [General [General Bridge No. Bridge Name Structure [Classification] [Classification] [Classification] Route [Classification] ] Information] Information] 1 00105A INTERSTATE-95 METRO NORTH & CITY ST'S 08070 - BRIDGEPORT 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 161300 1999 2 00164 INTERSTATE-95 ROUTE 10 52070 - NEW HAVEN 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 152800 1957 3 00038 INTERSTATE-95 HAMILTON AVENUE 73070 - STAMFORD 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 149600 1958 4 00014 INTERSTATE-95 METRO NORTH RR & STATION 33620 - GREENWICH 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 146000 1958 5 00045 INTERSTATE-95 ROUTE 136 18850 - DARIEN 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 144100 1952 6 00033 INTERSTATE-95 MAPLE AVENUE 73070 - STAMFORD 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 143900 1958 7 00011 INTERSTATE-95 DAVIS AVENUE 33620 - GREENWICH 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 143800 1958 8 00027 INTERSTATE-95 SSR 493(WASHINGTON
    [Show full text]
  • Maine State Legislature
    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from electronic originals (may include minor formatting differences from printed original) * ~·:· MaineDOT Three-Year ork Plan 2020 Edition January 14, 2020 January 14, 2020 MaineDOT Customers and Partners: On behalf of the 1,800 dedicated and valued employees at the Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT), I am privileged to present this 2020 Edition of our Work Plan for the three calendar years 2020, 2021, and 2022. This Work Plan includes all capital projects and programs, maintenance and operations activities, planning initiatives, and administrative functions. This plan contains 2,051 individual work items with a total value of $2.59 billion, consisting principally of work to be delivered or coordinated through MaineDOT, but also including funding and work by other transportation agencies including airports and transit agencies. This plan is the primary way that MaineDOT achieves its mission of responsibly providing our customers with the safest and most reliable transportation system possible, given available resources. Preparing the MaineDOT Work Plan takes many months. An early step is to adjust projects that had appeared in prior work plans, including changes to cost, schedule, scope, or available funding. In a typical year, we make the “old” projects whole and then add new capital projects worth hundreds of millions of dollars (principally in the third year of the plan). This year is not typical. Due to cost increases arising from workforce challenges, work constraints, and other factors, making the old projects whole has required an extraordinary amount of funding.
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section I
    I(f) inhibitors I-215 (Salt Lake City, Utah) Interessengemeinschaft Farbenindustrie USE If inhibitors USE Interstate 215 (Salt Lake City, Utah) Aktiengesellschaft Trial, Nuremberg, I & M Canal National Heritage Corridor (Ill.) I-225 (Colo.) Germany, 1947-1948 USE Illinois and Michigan Canal National Heritage USE Interstate 225 (Colo.) Subsequent proceedings, Nuremberg War Corridor (Ill.) I-244 (Tulsa, Okla.) Crime Trials, case no. 6 I & M Canal State Trail (Ill.) USE Interstate 244 (Tulsa, Okla.) BT Nuremberg War Crime Trials, Nuremberg, USE Illinois and Michigan Canal State Trail (Ill.) I-255 (Ill. and Mo.) Germany, 1946-1949 I-5 USE Interstate 255 (Ill. and Mo.) I-H-3 (Hawaii) USE Interstate 5 I-270 (Ill. and Mo. : Proposed) USE Interstate H-3 (Hawaii) I-8 (Ariz. and Calif.) USE Interstate 255 (Ill. and Mo.) I-hadja (African people) USE Interstate 8 (Ariz. and Calif.) I-270 (Md.) USE Kasanga (African people) I-10 USE Interstate 270 (Md.) I Ho Yüan (Beijing, China) USE Interstate 10 I-278 (N.J. and N.Y.) USE Yihe Yuan (Beijing, China) I-15 USE Interstate 278 (N.J. and N.Y.) I Ho Yüan (Peking, China) USE Interstate 15 I-291 (Conn.) USE Yihe Yuan (Beijing, China) I-15 (Fighter plane) USE Interstate 291 (Conn.) I-hsing ware USE Polikarpov I-15 (Fighter plane) I-394 (Minn.) USE Yixing ware I-16 (Fighter plane) USE Interstate 394 (Minn.) I-K'a-wan Hsi (Taiwan) USE Polikarpov I-16 (Fighter plane) I-395 (Baltimore, Md.) USE Qijiawan River (Taiwan) I-17 USE Interstate 395 (Baltimore, Md.) I-Kiribati (May Subd Geog) USE Interstate 17 I-405 (Wash.) UF Gilbertese I-19 (Ariz.) USE Interstate 405 (Wash.) BT Ethnology—Kiribati USE Interstate 19 (Ariz.) I-470 (Ohio and W.
    [Show full text]