DOCSLIB.ORG

Eco-Ethology of Shell-Dwelling Cichlids in Lake Tanganyika

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eco-Ethology of Shell-Dwelling Cichlids in Lake Tanganyika ECO-ETHOLOGY OF SHELL-DWELLING CICHLIDS IN LAKE TANGANYIKA THESIS Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE of Rhodes University by IAN ROGER BILLS February 1996 'The more we get to know about the two greatest of the African Rift Valley Lakes, Tanganyika and Malawi, the more interesting and exciting they become.' L.C. Beadle (1974). A male Lamprologus ocel/alus displaying at a heterospecific intruder. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The field work for this study was conducted part time whilst gworking for Chris and Jeane Blignaut, Cape Kachese Fisheries, Zambia. I am indebted to them for allowing me time off from work, fuel, boats, diving staff and equipment and their friendship through out this period. This study could not have been occured without their support. I also thank all the members of Cape Kachese Fisheries who helped with field work, in particular: Lackson Kachali, Hanold Musonda, Evans Chingambo, Luka Musonda, Whichway Mazimba, Rogers Mazimba and Mathew Chama. Chris and Jeane Blignaut provided funds for travel to South Africa and partially supported my work in Grahamstown. The permit for fish collection was granted by the Director of Fisheries, Mr. H.D.Mudenda. Many discussions were held with Mr. Martin Pearce, then the Chief Fisheries Officer at Mpulungu, my thanks to them both. The staff of the JLB Smith Institute and DIFS (Rhodes University) are thanked for help in many fields: Ms. Daksha Naran helped with computing and organisation of many tables and graphs; Mrs. S.E. Radloff (Statistics Department, Rhodes University) and Dr. Horst Kaiser gave advice on statistics; Mrs Nikki Kohly, Mrs Elaine Heemstra and Mr. Dave Voorvelt produced the numerous excellent illustrations; Mrs. G. Armstrong (Geography Department, Rhodes University) conducted sediment grain size analysis; Ms Cindy Kulongowski, Dr Eva Hert, Ms Vanessa Twentyman-Jones, Mr Ofer Gon, Dr Paul Skelton and Dr M. Villet made comments on various parts of this thesis; Mr Ofer Gon and Dr Paul Skelton are thanked for numerous valuable discussions on many aspects throughout this study. Dr Martin Villet ran the phylogenetic data on Hennig86. Dr Martin Villet also read through the penultimate draft of the thesis and made value comments, he is sincerely thanked for all his help. Sincere thanks to my tutors Dr Tony Ribbink and the late Dr Humphry Greenwood for advice, guidance and patience during the course of my studies at Rhodes University. I was partially supported by a studentship from Dr Tony Ribbink. A huge thanks to Dakha Naran who has been a great friend and an enormous help over the past two years. Finally thanks and love to my parents who have supported me in so many ways for many years. ABSTRACT Observations of habitats are reported. A series of underwater experiments were conducted in natural habitats to answer questions concerning a) why Lamprologus ocellatus and Lamprologus ornatipinnis bury gastropod shells refuges into the substrate, and b) to examine interspecies differences in shell-using behaviours. Some behaviour patterns were analysed using phylogenetic methods. Lamprologus ocellatus and L. omatipinnis responded to new shells in a variety of ways, shells were moved, buried (and used) or hidden (buried and not used). How shells are utilised seems to be dependant on a complex of factors such as the size and quality of new the shell and the number already in the territory. Shell use may also be affected by neighbour species, sex, size and predation levels. There are interspecific differences in the size of shells used and the methods of shell use. The latter results in species-characteristic shell orientations, vertical burial in L. oeellatus and horizontal burial in L. ornatipinnis. Shell orientation does affect other species/use of shells. Shell movement and vertical orientation appear to be apomorphic while shell while shell hiding and burial are pleisiomorphic within the genus Lampr%gus. Numerous cues are involved in stimulating shell burial. Most of these cues are actively sought by the fish by external and internal inspections. Shell burial therefore appears to be a method of reducing the information gathering ability of potential shell-dwelling competitors. Shell burial can therefore be regarded as an investment process which enhances the residents ability to defend its territory. Males can also control the distribution of open shells within teritories and thus control mate access to shells. This behaviour could be a significant factor in the evolutin of marked sexual dichromatism exhibited within the genus. ii CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .............•..•............•.................. 1 SHELL-DWELLERS ....•.................•....................... 2 In Lake Tanganyika ..•...........•...........•.............. 2 In Lake Malawi ...............•........................... 6 In marine habitats ........•................................ 6 SOFT SUBSTRATE SHELL-DWELLERS .....•.•......................... 8 DIAGNOSES OF THE SHELL DWELLERS STUDIED .••.................... 11 OBJECTIVES OF THIS STUDY ............................••....... 12 CHAPTER 2 FIELD OBSERVATIONS IN SOFT SUBSTRATE HABITATS OF LAKE TANGANYIKA •..•.........................•.... 13 INTRODUCTION ..........................................•.... 13 OBSERVATIONS, DESCRIPTIONS OF STUDY SITES AND METHODS ..............•........................... 15 RESULTS ........................•......................•.... 17 THE FISH COMMUNITY ......•..••...........•......•............ 17 Day-time ............................................... 17 Night-time . • . 1 7 OBSERVATIONS OF SHELL-DWELLING FISHES ....••.................•. 17 Abundance ............................................. 17 Social structure of shell-dwellers .............................. 20 Numbers of shells in territories ................................ 21 Inter-shell distances and shell distributions ....................... 24 Refuge use and fleeing behaviour - day-time ...................... 25 - night-time ....................•. 28 Oviposition sites. ........................................ 28 Feeding behaviour observations ............................... 29 MOLLUSC SHELL DEPOSITS .........•.•.......................... 30 iii Shells used by cichlids ..................................... 30 Shell occupancy .......................................... 31 DESCRIPTIONS OF STUDY AND COLLECTION SITES ..................... 34 Musende Rocks, Zambia .................................... 34 Mbita Island, Zambia ...................................... 36 ChezL Zambia ........................................... 39 Gitaza, Burundi .......................................... 39 SUBSTRATE GRAIN SIZES ........................................ 40 REMARI(S AND DISCUSSION ...................................... 42 Shell-dwelling fish abundance ................................ 42 Territory sizes of shell-dwellers ............................... 42 Refuge use ............................................. 42 Oviposition sites and female behaviour .......................... 43 Feeding ................................................ 44 CONCLUSIONS ................................................ 44 CHAPTER 3 SHELL BURIAL BEHAVIOUR BY UNDERWATER EXPERIMENTS IN NATURAL HABITATS ......................................... 46 INTRODUCTION ............................................... 46 MATERIAL AI\ID GEI\IERAL METHODS ................................ 49 Data analysis ............................................ 49 EXPERIMENTS AND RESULTS ..................................... 51 Experiment 1 (shell quality) .................................. 51 Methods ............................................... 51 Results ................................................ 52 Experiment 2 (varying shell size) .............................. 55 Methods ............................................... 55 Results ................................................ 56 Experiment 3 (shell abundance) ............................... 58 Methods ................................................ 58 Results ................................................ 59 iv Experiment 4 (shell abundance) ............................... 62 Methods ............................................... 62 Results ................................................ 62 Experiment 5 (shells not buried) ............................... 64 Methods ............................................... 64 Results ................................................ 64 DISCUSSION ................................................. 67 Can fish determine shell quality? .............................. 67 Do fish respond differently to varying sized shells? .............•.............................. 69 Does shell abundance affect fish behaviour? ...................... 69 Does shell abundance affect numbers of shell-dwelling communities? ................................. 70 What if shells are prevented from being buried? .................... 71 Why are shells buried? ..................................... 71 CHAPTER 4 INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION FOR SHELL RESOURCES ................... 75 INTRODUCTION ............................................... 75 MATERIAL AND GENERAL METHODS ................................ 76 Experiment 1 (interspecific shell size) ........................... 76 Methods ............................................... 76 Results ................................................ 77 Experiment 2 (interspecific methods) .....•..................... 85 Methods ..............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Female Social Dominance Does Not Establish Mating Priority in Nile Tilapia
    Revista de Etologia 2004, Vol.6, N°1,Social 33-37 dominance and mating in the Nile tilapia Female Social Dominance does not Establish Mating Priority in Nile Tilapia ELIANE GONÇALVES-DE-FREITAS AND ALINE CHIMELLO FERREIRA Universidade Estadual Paulista, São José do Rio Preto Female dominance and size are important features for mating choices in fishes. As dominants are also the largest females in some species, we tested whether dominance per se favours mating priority in Nile tilapia females. Three matched-size adult females (n = 13) were grouped in a 140 l-aquarium during 3 days for hierarchical settlement. On the 4th day a male larger than the females was introduced in the group and kept there for 12 consecutive days until reproduction. Spawning occurred in 8 out of 13 replicates, and the alpha female was the first to mate in only 50% of the cases. Males may thus choose females according to size and not according to rank, as occurs in other cichlid species. As confrontations and the establishment of hierarchical dominance involve high energetic expenditure in Nile tilapias, the reason why females invest in such behaviors is still a question to be elucidated. Index terms: Reproductive behavior. Mate choice. Nile tilapias. Oreochromis niloticus. A dominância social da fêmea não promove prioridade de acasalamento em fêmeas de tilápia-do-Nilo. A dominância e o tamanho da fêmea são características importantes para a escolha do parceiro sexual em peixes. Como as fêmeas dominantes também são as maiores em várias espécies, procuramos verificar se a dominância em si promove a prioridade de acasalamento em fêmeas de tilápia-do-Nilo.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary History of Lake Tanganyika's Predatory Deepwater
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Evolutionary Biology Volume 2012, Article ID 716209, 10 pages doi:10.1155/2012/716209 Research Article Evolutionary History of Lake Tanganyika’s Predatory Deepwater Cichlids Paul C. Kirchberger, Kristina M. Sefc, Christian Sturmbauer, and Stephan Koblmuller¨ Department of Zoology, Karl-Franzens-University Graz, Universitatsplatz¨ 2, 8010 Graz, Austria Correspondence should be addressed to Stephan Koblmuller,¨ [email protected] Received 22 December 2011; Accepted 5 March 2012 Academic Editor: R. Craig Albertson Copyright © 2012 Paul C. Kirchberger et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Hybridization among littoral cichlid species in Lake Tanganyika was inferred in several molecular phylogenetic studies. The phenomenon is generally attributed to the lake level-induced shoreline and habitat changes. These allow for allopatric divergence of geographically fragmented populations alternating with locally restricted secondary contact and introgression between incompletely isolated taxa. In contrast, the deepwater habitat is characterized by weak geographic structure and a high potential for gene flow, which may explain the lower species richness of deepwater than littoral lineages. For the same reason, divergent deepwater lineages should have evolved strong intrinsic reproductive isolation already in the incipient stages of diversification, and, consequently, hybridization among established lineages should have been less frequent than in littoral lineages. We test this hypothesis in the endemic Lake Tanganyika deepwater cichlid tribe Bathybatini by comparing phylogenetic trees of Hemibates and Bathybates species obtained with nuclear multilocus AFLP data with a phylogeny based on mitochondrial sequences.
    [Show full text]
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • Neolamprologus Longicaudatus, a New Cichlid Fish from the Zairean Coast of Lake Tanganyika
    Japan. J. Ichthyol. 魚 類 学 雑 誌 42(1): 39-43, 1995 42(1): 39-43, 1995 Neolamprologus longicaudatus, a New Cichlid Fish from the Zairean Coast of Lake Tanganyika Kazuhiro Nakaya1 and Masta Mukwaya Gashagaza2 Laboratory of Marine Zoology, Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido1 University, 3-1-1 Minato-cho, Hakodate, Hokkaido 041, Japan 2Centre de Recherche en Hydrobiologie , Uvira, Zaire, B.P. 254, Bujumbura, Burundi (Received September 9, 1994; in revised form February 10, 1995; accepted March 17, 1995) Abstract A new cichlid, Neolamprologus longicaudatus sp. nov. is described , based on three specimens from the north Zairean coast of Lake Tanganyika. Although similar to N. furcifer, N. christyi and N. buescheri in having an elongate body, strongly emarginate caudal fin, and vertical fins partly covered with scales, this species is distinguishable from them by its small orbit, light grayish-brown coloration of body, dorsal fin lacking a submarginal dark band, 37 longitudinal body scales, 8 gill rakers on lower limb of the 1st gill arch, and a long pointed snout. Neolamprologus is a genus of the family Cichlidae Neolamprologus longicaudatus sp. nov. in Lake Tanganyika, one of the Great Rift Valley (Figs. 1, 2) lakes in the central east Africa. Lake Tanganyika is famous for its remarkable endemism seen in the Neolamprologussp. "Kavalla" Konings and Dieckhof ,f cichlid fishes, and the genus Neolamprologus is also 1992:150, fig. (Milima Island, Zair e) . endemic to the lake. Neolamprologus is the largest Holotype. HUMZ (Laboratory of Marine Zoolog y , genus among Lake Tanganyikan cichlids, and 42 Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University) 12767 0 , species are presently known from the lake (Biischer, 85.5mm in standard length (SL), Cape Banza, Ubwar i 1991, 1992a, 1992b, 1993; Marechal and Poll, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • A.'Afri<Lue" Rica . a Translation of Certain Extracts
    A translation of certain extracts from "Les genres des poissons d'eau douce de l'Afrique" (The genera of freshwater fish from Africa) by M. Poll (1957) Item Type monograph Authors Poll, M.; Mann, M.J. Publisher East African Freshwater Fisheries Research Organization Download date 06/10/2021 23:24:35 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/34947 .. • ~t CCASION A translation of certain extracts from : "Les genres des poissons d'eau ) a.'Afri<lue" (The genera of freshwater fish from Africa) by M. POLL (1957) Ann. Mus. Roy. Congo BeIge. Serf So, Zool. 1-191 translated by M.J. Mann (Fisheries Research Officer) E.A.F.F.R.O. P.O. Box 343, Jinja , Uganda• December, 1967. • ' CONTENTS (Sections in lower case are not included in the transla tion) • Page., 'I!Ei.AN'SUWR f S TION••••••• 0 ••••• 0 • . 11 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • _ • •• I 1>. ~, ODUC TION •••••••••••.•••••••• 0 •••••••••••. •••••••••••••••• _ • ••••• . table of the classes, families and genera of represented in the freshwater of rica General characters of each family . GENERAL GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE FISH FAUNA••••• e, . • •• 3 ..DISTRIBUTION OF FRESHWATER FISHES IN THE CONGO •••.•J.2 eE DIAGNOSTIC OF FISH ••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.• ••• 17 KEY FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF FAMILIES OF AFRICAN FRESHWATER •• lS KEY FOR IDENTIFICATION OF GENERA OF AFRICAN FRESHWATER FISH•.•••• 21 Bibliography Index of figure s Index scientific names Map of African ichthyological r egions - CCAS10NAL PAPEo A translation of certain extracts from : "Les genres des poissons d'eau de·.a.'Afrique " (The genera of freshwater fish from Africa) by M. POLL (1957) Ann. Mus. Roy. Congo BeIge. Sere So, Zool.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Models of Speciation 1.0Cm Modelos Espaciais De Especiação
    UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE CAMPINAS INSTITUTO DE BIOLOGIA CAROLINA LEMES NASCIMENTO COSTA SPATIAL MODELS OF SPECIATION MODELOS ESPACIAIS DE ESPECIAÇÃO CAMPINAS 2019 CAROLINA LEMES NASCIMENTO COSTA SPATIAL MODELS OF SPECIATION MODELOS ESPACIAIS DE ESPECIAÇÃO Thesis presented to the Institute of Biology of the University of Campinas in partial fulfill- ment of the requirements for the degree of Doc- tor in Ecology Tese apresentada ao Instituto de Biologia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas como parte dos requisitos exigidos para a obtenção do título de Doutora em Ecologia Orientador: Marcus Aloizio Martinez de Aguiar ESTE ARQUIVO DIGITAL CORRESPONDE À VERSÃO FINAL DA TESE DEFENDIDA PELA ALUNA CAROLINA LEMES NASCIMENTO COSTA, E ORIENTADA PELO PROF DR. MAR- CUS ALOIZIO MARTINEZ DE AGUIAR. CAMPINAS 2019 Ficha catalográfica Universidade Estadual de Campinas Biblioteca do Instituto de Biologia Mara Janaina de Oliveira - CRB 8/6972 Costa, Carolina Lemes Nascimento, 1989- C823s CosSpatial models of speciation / Carolina Lemes Nascimento Costa. – Campinas, SP : [s.n.], 2019. CosOrientador: Marcus Aloizio Martinez de Aguiar. CosTese (doutorado) – Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Biologia. Cos1. Especiação. 2. Radiação adaptativa (Evolução). 3. Modelos biológicos. 4. Padrão espacial. 5. Macroevolução. I. Aguiar, Marcus Aloizio Martinez de, 1960-. II. Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Instituto de Biologia. III. Título. Informações para Biblioteca Digital Título em outro idioma: Modelos espaciais de especiação Palavras-chave em inglês: Speciation Adaptive radiation (Evolution) Biological models Spatial pattern Macroevolution Área de concentração: Ecologia Titulação: Doutora em Ecologia Banca examinadora: Marcus Aloizio Martinez de Aguiar [Orientador] Mathias Mistretta Pires Sabrina Borges Lino Araujo Rodrigo André Caetano Gustavo Burin Ferreira Data de defesa: 25-02-2019 Programa de Pós-Graduação: Ecologia Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Comissão Examinadora: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • AN ECOLOGICAL and SYSTEMATIC SURVEY of FISHES in the RAPIDS of the LOWER ZA.Fre OR CONGO RIVER
    AN ECOLOGICAL AND SYSTEMATIC SURVEY OF FISHES IN THE RAPIDS OF THE LOWER ZA.fRE OR CONGO RIVER TYSON R. ROBERTS1 and DONALD J. STEWART2 CONTENTS the rapids habitats, and the adaptations and mode of reproduction of the fishes discussed. Abstract ______________ ----------------------------------------------- 239 Nineteen new species are described from the Acknowledgments ----------------------------------- 240 Lower Zaire rapids, belonging to the genera Introduction _______________________________________________ 240 Mormyrus, Alestes, Labeo, Bagrus, Chrysichthys, Limnology ---------------------------------------------------------- 242 Notoglanidium, Gymnallabes, Chiloglanis, Lampro­ Collecting Methods and Localities __________________ 244 logus, Nanochromis, Steatocranus, Teleogramma, Tabulation of species ---------------------------------------- 249 and Mastacembelus, most of them with obvious Systematics -------------------------------------------------------- 249 modifications for life in the rapids. Caecomasta­ Campylomormyrus _______________ 255 cembelus is placed in the synonymy of Mastacem­ M ormyrus ____ --------------------------------- _______________ 268 belus, and morphologically intermediate hybrids Alestes __________________ _________________ 270 reported between blind, depigmented Mastacem­ Bryconaethiops -------------------------------------------- 271 belus brichardi and normally eyed, darkly pig­ Labeo ---------------------------------------------------- _______ 274 mented M astacembelus brachyrhinus. The genera Bagrus
    [Show full text]
  • View/Download
    CICHLIFORMES: Cichlidae (part 3) · 1 The ETYFish Project © Christopher Scharpf and Kenneth J. Lazara COMMENTS: v. 6.0 - 30 April 2021 Order CICHLIFORMES (part 3 of 8) Family CICHLIDAE Cichlids (part 3 of 7) Subfamily Pseudocrenilabrinae African Cichlids (Haplochromis through Konia) Haplochromis Hilgendorf 1888 haplo-, simple, proposed as a subgenus of Chromis with unnotched teeth (i.e., flattened and obliquely truncated teeth of H. obliquidens); Chromis, a name dating to Aristotle, possibly derived from chroemo (to neigh), referring to a drum (Sciaenidae) and its ability to make noise, later expanded to embrace cichlids, damselfishes, dottybacks and wrasses (all perch-like fishes once thought to be related), then beginning to be used in the names of African cichlid genera following Chromis (now Oreochromis) mossambicus Peters 1852 Haplochromis acidens Greenwood 1967 acies, sharp edge or point; dens, teeth, referring to its sharp, needle-like teeth Haplochromis adolphifrederici (Boulenger 1914) in honor explorer Adolf Friederich (1873-1969), Duke of Mecklenburg, leader of the Deutsche Zentral-Afrika Expedition (1907-1908), during which type was collected Haplochromis aelocephalus Greenwood 1959 aiolos, shifting, changing, variable; cephalus, head, referring to wide range of variation in head shape Haplochromis aeneocolor Greenwood 1973 aeneus, brazen, referring to “brassy appearance” or coloration of adult males, a possible double entendre (per Erwin Schraml) referring to both “dull bronze” color exhibited by some specimens and to what
    [Show full text]
  • The AQUATIC DESIGN CENTRE
    The AQUATIC DESIGN CENTRE ltd 26 Zennor Road Trade Park, Balham, SW12 0PS Ph: 020 7580 6764 [email protected] PLEASE CALL TO CHECK AVAILABILITY ON DAY Complete Freshwater Livestock (2019) Livebearers Common Name In Stock Y/N Limia melanogaster Y Poecilia latipinna Dalmatian Molly Y Poecilia latipinna Silver Lyre Tail Molly Y Poecilia reticulata Male Guppy Asst Colours Y Poecilia reticulata Red Cap, Cobra, Elephant Ear Guppy Y Poecilia reticulata Female Guppy Y Poecilia sphenops Molly: Black, Canary, Silver, Marble. y Poecilia velifera Sailfin Molly Y Poecilia wingei Endler's Guppy Y Xiphophorus hellerii Swordtail: Pineapple,Red, Green, Black, Lyre Y Xiphophorus hellerii Kohaku Swordtail, Koi, HiFin Xiphophorus maculatus Platy: wagtail,blue,red, sunset, variatus Y Tetras Common Name Aphyocarax paraguayemsis White Tip Tetra Aphyocharax anisitsi Bloodfin Tetra Y Arnoldichthys spilopterus Red Eye Tetra Y Axelrodia riesei Ruby Tetra Bathyaethiops greeni Red Back Congo Tetra Y Boehlkea fredcochui Blue King Tetra Copella meinkeni Spotted Splashing Tetra Crenuchus spilurus Sailfin Characin y Gymnocorymbus ternetzi Black Widow Tetra Y Hasemania nana Silver Tipped Tetra y Hemigrammus erythrozonus Glowlight Tetra y Hemigrammus ocelifer Beacon Tetra y Hemigrammus pulcher Pretty Tetra y Hemigrammus rhodostomus Diamond Back Rummy Nose y Hemigrammus rhodostomus Rummy nose Tetra y Hemigrammus rubrostriatus Hemigrammus vorderwimkieri Platinum Tetra y Hyphessobrycon amandae Ember Tetra y Hyphessobrycon amapaensis Amapa Tetra Y Hyphessobrycon bentosi
    [Show full text]
  • Indian and Madagascan Cichlids
    FAMILY Cichlidae Bonaparte, 1835 - cichlids SUBFAMILY Etroplinae Kullander, 1998 - Indian and Madagascan cichlids [=Etroplinae H] GENUS Etroplus Cuvier, in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1830 - cichlids [=Chaetolabrus, Microgaster] Species Etroplus canarensis Day, 1877 - Canara pearlspot Species Etroplus suratensis (Bloch, 1790) - green chromide [=caris, meleagris] GENUS Paretroplus Bleeker, 1868 - cichlids [=Lamena] Species Paretroplus dambabe Sparks, 2002 - dambabe cichlid Species Paretroplus damii Bleeker, 1868 - damba Species Paretroplus gymnopreopercularis Sparks, 2008 - Sparks' cichlid Species Paretroplus kieneri Arnoult, 1960 - kotsovato Species Paretroplus lamenabe Sparks, 2008 - big red cichlid Species Paretroplus loisellei Sparks & Schelly, 2011 - Loiselle's cichlid Species Paretroplus maculatus Kiener & Mauge, 1966 - damba mipentina Species Paretroplus maromandia Sparks & Reinthal, 1999 - maromandia cichlid Species Paretroplus menarambo Allgayer, 1996 - pinstripe damba Species Paretroplus nourissati (Allgayer, 1998) - lamena Species Paretroplus petiti Pellegrin, 1929 - kotso Species Paretroplus polyactis Bleeker, 1878 - Bleeker's paretroplus Species Paretroplus tsimoly Stiassny et al., 2001 - tsimoly cichlid GENUS Pseudetroplus Bleeker, in G, 1862 - cichlids Species Pseudetroplus maculatus (Bloch, 1795) - orange chromide [=coruchi] SUBFAMILY Ptychochrominae Sparks, 2004 - Malagasy cichlids [=Ptychochrominae S2002] GENUS Katria Stiassny & Sparks, 2006 - cichlids Species Katria katria (Reinthal & Stiassny, 1997) - Katria cichlid GENUS
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation
    Evolution in Darwin’s Dreampond: The genomic substrate for adaptive radiation in Lake Tanganyika cichlid fish Walter Salzburger Zoological Institute drawings: Julie Johnson drawings: !Charles R. Darwin’s (1809-1882) journey onboard of the HMS Beagle lasted from 27 December 1831 until 2 October 1836 Adaptive Radiation !Darwin’s specimens were classified as “an entirely new group” of 12 species by ornithologist John Gould (1804-1881) African Great Lakes taxonomic diversity at the species level L. Turkana 1 5 50 500 species 0 50 100 % endemics 4°N L. Tanganyika L. Tanganyika L. Albert 2°N L. Malawi L. Malawi L. Edward L. Victoria L. Victoria 0° L. Edward L. Edward L. Kivu L. Victoria 2°S L. Turkana L. Turkana L. Albert L. Albert 4°S L. Kivu L. Kivu L. Tanganyika 6°S taxonomic diversity at the genus level 10 20 30 40 50 genera 0 50 100 % endemics 8°S Rungwe L. Tanganyika L. Tanganyika Volcanic Field L. Malawi 10°S L. Malawi L. Victoria L. Victoria 12°S L. Malawi L. Edward L. Edward L. Turkana L. Turkana 14°S cichlid fish non-cichlid fish L. Albert L. Albert gastropods bivalves 28°E 30°E 32°E 34°E 36°E L. Kivu L. Kivu ostracods ••• W Salzburger, B Van Bockxlaer, AS Cohen (2017), AREES | AS Cohen & W Salzburger (2017) Scientific Drilling Cichlid Fishes Fotos: Angel M. Fitor Angel M. Fotos: !About every 20th fish species on our planet is the product of the ongoing explosive radiations of cichlids in the East African Great Lakes taxonomic~Diversity Victoria [~500 sp.] Tanganyika [250 sp.] Malawi [~1000 sp.] ••• ME Santos & W Salzburger (2012) Science ecological morphological~Diversity zooplanktivore insectivore piscivore algae scraper leaf eater fin biter eye biter mud digger scale eater ••• H Hofer & W Salzburger (2008) Biologie III ecological morphological~Diversity ••• W Salzburger (2009) Molecular Ecology astbur Astbur.:1-90001 Alignment 1 neobri 100% Neobri.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Regional Information Base for Lake Tanganyika Research
    RESEARCH FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE FISHERIES ON LAKE GCP/RAF/271/FIN-TD/Ol(En) TANGANYIKA GCP/RAF/271/FIN-TD/01 (En) January 1992 TOWARDS A REGIONAL INFORMATION BASE FOR LAKE TANGANYIKA RESEARCH by J. Eric Reynolds FINNISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Bujumbura, January 1992 The conclusions and recommendations given in this and other reports in the Research for the Management of the Fisheries on Lake Tanganyika Project series are those considered appropriate at the time of preparation. They may be modified in the light of further knowledge gained at subsequent stages of the Project. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of FAO or FINNIDA concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or concerning the determination of its frontiers or boundaries. PREFACE The Research for the Management of the Fisheries on Lake Tanganyika project (Tanganyika Research) became fully operational in January 1992. It is executed by the Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations (FAO) and funded by the Finnish International Development Agency (FINNIDA). This project aims at the determination of the biological basis for fish production on Lake Tanganyika, in order to permit the formulation of a coherent lake-wide fisheries management policy for the four riparian States (Burundi, Tanzania, Zaïre and Zambia). Particular attention will be also given to the reinforcement of the skills and physical facilities of the fisheries research units in all four beneficiary countries as well as to the buildup of effective coordination mechanisms to ensure full collaboration between the Governments concerned.
    [Show full text]