Chapter 3. Affected Environment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 3. Affected Environment Chapter3: Affected Environment CHAPTER 3. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 3.1. Introduction This section describes the affected environment as it currently exists. The discussion is organized by the following major resource topics: air quality and noise, geology and minerals, paleontological resources, soils, water resources, vegetation, wildlife, special status species, land use and transportation, visual and recreation resources, cultural resources, Native American concerns, socioeconomics and environmental justice, and hazardous and solid waste. 3.1.1. Project Area 3.1.1.1. Proposed Pipeline ROW The proposed common carrier pipeline would extend approximately 399 miles from the cluster of five refineries in southern Davis and northern Salt Lake counties, including Holly’s Woods Cross Refinery, to the Apex Industrial Park northeast of Las Vegas, Nevada, with two short lateral pipelines, one in Salt Lake County from the mainline to the Salt Lake City Airport, the other from the mainline to a terminal in the Cedar City, Utah area (see Exhibit 1.1-1). In Utah, the proposed main pipeline would originate in Davis County and cross Salt Lake, Tooele, Juab, Millard, Beaver, Iron, and Washington counties. In Nevada, the main pipeline would cross Lincoln County and terminate in Clark County. The main pipeline route would primarily cross BLM (203.79 miles) and private (125.56 miles) lands. It would cross lesser amounts of state (35.84 miles), U.S. Forest Service (17.78 miles), Moapa Band of Paiute Indian Reservation (14.57 miles), and U.S. Department of Defense (2.35 miles) lands for a total of 399.89 miles. The main pipeline route would cross approximately 2 miles of water. The proposed Airport Lateral in Salt Lake County would cross approximately 2.4 miles of private land. The proposed Cedar City Lateral in Iron County would cross 4.56 miles of BLM land and 5.8 miles of private land. The Area of Analysis section under each resource specifies the area for which detailed information is provided for that resource. 3.1.1.2. Proposed Utility Corridor The proposed utility corridor on lands administered by the SLFO, from MP 54 to MP 82.5 (the Tooele/Juab County line), would be 0.75 mile (3,960 feet) wide. In most cases the Area of Analysis for each resource does not provide site-specific information for the proposed corridor. Additional general information to describe the affected environment for the proposed utility corridor is provided through references to pertinent sections of the WEC PEIS (DOE 2008). The WEC PEIS was prepared to analyze the environmental impacts of establishing numerous utility corridors throughout the 11 western states (see Section 1.2.3). The affected environment studied and described in the WEC PEIS includes the area for one WEC corridor that aligns with the utility corridor proposed in this FEIS, and so provides context for better understanding the resources within the proposed corridor. 3.1.2. Resources Not Affected Based on BLM Checklists (Appendix A) prepared by each Utah BLM Field Office and discussions with the Las Vegas and Ely Field Offices, the resources discussed below were not carried forward for detailed analysis. Page 3-1 Chapter 3: Affected Environment 3.1.2.1. Wild and Scenic Rivers The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, signed into law on October 2, 1968, protects the free-flowing waters of many of the country's most spectacular rivers. The Act is notable for safeguarding the special character of these rivers, while also recognizing the potential for appropriate use and development. As of 2006, the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System protected more than 11,000 miles of 165 rivers in 38 states and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. There are no rivers or segments of rivers designated as Wild and Scenic or that are considered eligible for designation within the project area. Further, considering the eligibility of rivers or river segments is outside the scope of the plan amendment to designate a new utility corridor and issue a ROW permit. Therefore these resources are not carried forward for detailed analysis (NWSRS 2007). 3.1.2.2. Designated Wilderness, Wilderness Study Areas, and Non-Wilderness Study lands with Wilderness Characteristics The Wilderness Act was passed by Congress in 1964 and continues to be the guiding piece of legislation for all Wilderness areas. The proposed pipeline or corridor would not cross any areas designated as Wilderness under the Wilderness Act, areas designated as Wilderness Study Areas that are currently managed for wilderness values, or non-Wilderness Study lands with wilderness characteristics (see Appendix A). Considering whether any lands within the Proposed Action area contain wilderness characteristics and how to manage those lands, if they existed, is outside the scope of the plan amendment to designate a new utility corridor and issue a ROW permit. Therefore wilderness resources are not carried forward for detailed analysis. 3.1.3. Affected Resources The following affected resources are analyzed in detail in the following sections of Chapter 3: • Air Quality and Noise • Geology and Minerals • Paleontological Resources • Soils • Water Resources • Vegetation • Wildlife • Special Status Species • Land Use and Transportation • Visual and Recreation Resources • Cultural Resources • Native American Concerns • Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice • Hazardous and Solid Waste Materials Page 3-2 Chapter3: Affected Environment 3.2. Air Quality 3.2.1. Area of Analysis With respect to air quality, the proposed pipeline route traverses from northern Utah to southern Nevada through counties designated attainment or nonattainment areas and through Class I and II “clean air areas” (Exhibits 3.2-4, and 3.2-5). Air masses and airsheds are, by definition, regional and mobile. The pipeline would originate in North Salt Lake, Utah, connect to a lateral line servicing the Salt Lake City Airport, connect to a second lateral line and terminal in Cedar City, Utah, and finally terminate at the Apex Industrial Park, northeast of Las Vegas, Nevada. Although the proposed pipeline lies directly in or near the Great Basin, various sections have different sub-climates dependent primarily upon location and elevation (CH2MHill 2008a). The area of analysis for air quality would also include areas in relatively close proximity to the project area that are designated for prevention of significant deterioration. 3.2.2. Data Sources and Methods The air quality affected environment was described using emission estimates based on regulatory- based available literature and airshed designation (Referring to attainment and nonattainment airsheds). No field studies were conducted; the affected environment description was developed based on best available data and information (CH2MHill 2008a). 3.2.3. Existing Conditions for Proposed Pipeline ROW 3.2.3.1. Area Climatology The proposed pipeline route traverses portions of the States of Utah and Nevada through a region that is classified as the Great Basin. The Great Basin is a region generally surrounded by the Sierra Nevada Mountains to the west and the Wasatch Mountains/Wasatch Plateau to the east. This region is effectively cut off from moist westerly flow from the Pacific where, due to orographic lifting, the majority of moisture precipitates out on the windward side of the Sierra Nevada. This effect produces a semi-arid climate in the Great Basin region where evaporation potential exceeds precipitation throughout the year. Interior basins are commonly around 4,000 to 5,000 feet above sea level and mean annual temperatures are near 64.4 °F (18 degrees C) (WRCC n.d. b). Diurnal temperature gradients during the summer months are nearly always greater than those of winter. This occurs as cold air from the surrounding mountains flows down the mountain barriers and settles at the bottom of the basin, thus allowing for hot days and cool nights. The prevailing upper-level wind in the Great Basin is west-southwesterly due to the strong upper-level predominate westerly flow known as the jet stream. Winds can become southerly or northerly depending upon the synoptic or more local mesoscale systems in the area. Easterlies are rarely observed on a large scale basis. On average, mixing of the atmosphere due to convection in the Great Basin region, promotes good air quality. Mean, minimum, maximum and annual temperatures including rainfall totals for the four stations along the pipeline are shown in Exhibit 3.2-1. North Salt Lake Sub Climate North Salt Lake lies approximately 4,430 feet above sea level, roughly 6 miles north of Salt Lake City. Temperatures in North Salt Lake in the summer frequently reach 100 °F during summer months and drop to near 20 °F during the winter months. Annual precipitation of 22.4 inches is normal for the area, some of which contributes to their nearly 59 inches of snow accumulation annually. Prevailing surface winds average 8.6 miles per hour (MPH) at a south-southeasterly direction (WRCC n.d. a). Page 3-3 Chapter 3: Affected Environment Exhibit 3.2-1 Monthly Climate Normals Temp (F) Precip. (in.) ch ch Wind Spd. il r r (MPH) Ap January February Ma May June July August September October November December Annual Mean Max. Temp. 36.5 41.6 50.9 58.7 68.3 79.7 88.4 86.8 76.3 63 48 38.3 61.4 Mean Temp. 29.1 33.2 41.2 48.2 57.7 67.7 75.8 73.9 63.8 52 39 30.7 51 Mean Min. Temp. 21.6 24.8 31.5 37.6 47 55.7 63.2 60.9 51.2 41 30 23.1 40.6 Mean Precip. 2 1.84 2.39 2.81 3 1.15 0.88 0.94 1.54 2.2 1.9 1.75 22.4 Avg. Wind Spd. 6.9 7.6 8.9 9.8 9.2 9.6 9.5 9.8 8.9 8.2 7.5 7.5 8.6 North Salt Lake Prev.
Recommended publications
  • UMNP Mountains Manual 2017
    Mountain Adventures Manual utahmasternaturalist.org June 2017 UMN/Manual/2017-03pr Welcome to Utah Master Naturalist! Utah Master Naturalist was developed to help you initiate or continue your own personal journey to increase your understanding of, and appreciation for, Utah’s amazing natural world. We will explore and learn aBout the major ecosystems of Utah, the plant and animal communities that depend upon those systems, and our role in shaping our past, in determining our future, and as stewards of the land. Utah Master Naturalist is a certification program developed By Utah State University Extension with the partnership of more than 25 other organizations in Utah. The mission of Utah Master Naturalist is to develop well-informed volunteers and professionals who provide education, outreach, and service promoting stewardship of natural resources within their communities. Our goal, then, is to assist you in assisting others to develop a greater appreciation and respect for Utah’s Beautiful natural world. “When we see the land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect.” - Aldo Leopold Participating in a Utah Master Naturalist course provides each of us opportunities to learn not only from the instructors and guest speaKers, But also from each other. We each arrive at a Utah Master Naturalist course with our own rich collection of knowledge and experiences, and we have a unique opportunity to share that Knowledge with each other. This helps us learn and grow not just as individuals, but together as a group with the understanding that there is always more to learn, and more to share.
    [Show full text]
  • IRON COUNTY COMMISSION MEETING January 12, 2015
    IRON COUNTY COMMISSION MEETING January 12, 2015 Minutes ofthe Iron County Commission meeting convened at 9:00a.m. January 12, 2015 in Commission Chambers at the Iron County Courthouse, Parowan, Utah. Officers in attendance included: David J. Miller Commission Chair Alma L. Adams Commissioner Dale M. Brinkerhoff Commissioner G. Michael Edwards Deputy County Attorney Jonathan T. Whittaker County Clerk Also present: Stephen Platt County Engineer Cindy W. Bulloch County Assessor Leslie Bishop Human Resources Director Bruce Anderson Landfill Supervisor SYNOPSIS AGREEMENT FOR RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENT GRANT ... ... ... ........... 4 ADJOURN ... 9 APPROVAL OF MINUTES ...... ...................................... ................ .............. .............. ........ ........... 2 BOARD APPOINTMENTS .. ........ ......... ....... .. .... ............ ................. ...... .. ....................... ........ .. .. .... 3 DISCUSSION OF NIGHT HUNTING ORDINANCE ................................... ..... .. ........ .... ............ 7 DISCUSSION OF THE USE OF COUNTY CREDIT CARDS ................................... .. ................ 3 PERSONNEL MATTERS ............ .. .. .. ................. .. .. ..... .................. ... .............. ............ ... ............ ..... 2 PRAIRIE DOG MATTERS ................ ................. ................................... ..................... ................... 3 PUBLIC COMMENTS ........ ...................... .................... ........................ .. ................ .. ... ... .... .......
    [Show full text]
  • R Media Brokerage Specialist Radio and TV
    California -San Bernardino (Los Angeles) KERN 0 Delano :s SAN BERNARDINO KHOF-TV WascO Ridgecresto ero Ch. 30 Oildales Bakersfield® ris Obispo Technical Facilities: Channel No. 30 °Lamont Arvin° (566 -572 MHz). Authorized power: or.hachapi horizon- 1120 -kw max. & 269 -kw SANTA BARSARA tal visual, 112 -kw max. & 26.9 -kw a ()Barstow VENTURA horizontal aural. Antenna: 2340 - 1poc ft. above ay. terrain, 143 -ft. above caster Santa Barbara ground, 5533 -ft. above sea level. almdale° ADE B GRADE A Latitude 34° 11' 15" Ventura San Fernando Longitude 117` 41' 58" 0 Oxnar e Glendale Transmitter: Sunset Ridge, 5.5 -mi. ;r 1 Port Huene 4 Bt rbank ®®PaSaden N of Claremont, Cal. omona Los Wiles® von 0 E TV tape: Recording facilities. Long Beach ORANGE Riverside *Santa Ana Pa Color: Live, film, slide & tape. Costa Mea ° aguna Hemet° Newport Bea News Wire Service: AP. Beach FM Affiliate: KHOF, 100 -kw, 99.5 MHz (No. 258), 240 -ft. O Oceans! ()Vista Arbitron Data: Not available. Carlsba oEs Ido oCalir Leucadi Map Note: Contours calculated by re- oBrc vised Sec. 73.699 of FCC Rules not available. ^oop El EI Centro® San Ding Cajon Lemon Grove Coronado +rion Cit SCALE OF MILES Imperial Beach r. a Vista Me 0 50 loo guano KHOF -TV Ref: FCC File No. BMPCT -6656 Granted 5/10/65 c0 American Map Co., Inc., N.Y., No. 14244 KHOF -TV Began Operation: Oct. 12, 1969. Network Service: None, independent. Represented (legal) by Cohen & Berfield. Licensee: Faith Center, 1615 S. Glendale Ave., Glendale, Cal. Personnel: (91205).
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico
    Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico William H. Romme, M. Lisa Floyd, David Hanna with contributions by Elisabeth J. Bartlett, Michele Crist, Dan Green, Henri D. Grissino-Mayer, J. Page Lindsey, Kevin McGarigal, & Jeffery S.Redders Produced by the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado State University, and Region 2 of the U.S. Forest Service May 12, 2009 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY … p 5 AUTHORS’ AFFILIATIONS … p 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS … p 16 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION A. Objectives and Organization of This Report … p 17 B. Overview of Physical Geography and Vegetation … p 19 C. Climate Variability in Space and Time … p 21 1. Geographic Patterns in Climate 2. Long-Term Variability in Climate D. Reference Conditions: Concept and Application … p 25 1. Historical Range of Variability (HRV) Concept 2. The Reference Period for this Analysis 3. Human Residents and Influences during the Reference Period E. Overview of Integrated Ecosystem Management … p 30 F. Literature Cited … p 34 CHAPTER II. PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS A. Vegetation Structure and Composition … p 39 B. Reference Conditions … p 40 1. Reference Period Fire Regimes 2. Other agents of disturbance 3. Pre-1870 stand structures C. Legacies of Euro-American Settlement and Current Conditions … p 67 1. Logging (“High-Grading”) in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 2. Excessive Livestock Grazing in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 3. Fire Exclusion Since the Late 1800s 4. Interactions: Logging, Grazing, Fire, Climate, and the Forests of Today D. Summary … p 83 E. Literature Cited … p 84 CHAPTER III.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter W-9 - Wildlife Properties
    07/15/2021 CHAPTER W-9 - WILDLIFE PROPERTIES Index Page ARTICLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS #900 REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL WILDLIFE 1 PROPERTIES, EXCEPT STATE TRUST LANDS ARTICLE II PROPERTY SPECIFIC PROVISIONS #901 PROPERTY SPECIFIC REGULATIONS 8 ARTICLE III STATE TRUST LANDS #902 REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL STATE TRUST LANDS 53 LEASED BY COLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFE #903 PROPERTY SPECIFIC REGULATIONS 55 ARTICLE IV STATE FISH UNITS #904 REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL STATE FISH UNITS 71 #905 PROPERTY SPECIFIC REGULATIONS 72 ARTICLE V BOATING RESTRICTIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL DIVISION CONTROLLED PROPERTIES, INCLUDING STATE TRUST LANDS LEASED BY COLORADO PARKS AND WILDLIFE #906 AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES (ANS) 72 APPENDIX A 74 APPENDIX B 75 Basis and Purpose 81 Statement CHAPTER W-9 - WILDLIFE PROPERTIES ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS #900 - REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL WILDLIFE PROPERTIES, EXCEPT STATE TRUST LANDS A. DEFINITIONS 1. “Aircraft” means any machine or device capable of atmospheric flight, including, but not limited to, airplanes, helicopters, gliders, dirigibles, balloons, rockets, hang gliders and parachutes, and any models thereof. 2. "Water contact activities" means swimming, wading (except for the purpose of fishing), waterskiing, sail surfboarding, scuba diving, and other water-related activities which put a person in contact with the water (without regard to the clothing or equipment worn). 3. “Youth mentor hunting” means hunting by youths under 18 years of age. Youth hunters under 16 years of age shall at all times be accompanied by a mentor when hunting on youth mentor properties. A mentor must be 18 years of age or older and hold a valid hunter education certificate or be born before January 1, 1949.
    [Show full text]
  • Scipio Irrigation Company Ivie Creek Pipeline Project - Watersmart
    Draft Environmental Assessment Scipio Irrigation Company Ivie Creek Pipeline Project - WaterSMART PRO-EA-16-026 Upper Colorado Region Provo Area Office Provo, Utah U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office Provo, Utah May 2017 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior protects and manages the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientific and other information about those resources; and honors its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Draft Environmental Assessment Scipio Irrigation Company Ivie Creek Pipeline Project – WaterSMART Upper Colorado Region Provo Area Office Provo, Utah Interdisciplinary Team Leader Jared Baxter Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office 302 East 1860 South Provo, UT 84606 801-379-1081 [email protected] U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office Provo, Utah May 2017 Contents Page Chapter 1 Purpose of and Need for Proposed Action ...................................... 1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background .......................................................................................... 1 1.3 Purpose of and Need for Proposed Action ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Defense Transportation and Logistics Community Will Be There
    The Defense Transportation and Logistics Community Will Be There MAXIMIZE YOUR VISIBILITY. NETWORK WITH KEY DECISION MAKERS. ENHANCE YOUR VALUE. Sponsor and Exhibit at the 2017 NDTA Fall Exposition Make plans to join us in St. Louis, Missouri October 10 - 13 for the 2017 NDTA Fall Exposition. This is the only venue focused directly on network- ing with top level government and industry decision makers in transporta- tion, logistics, distribution, passenger services, and related industries. Develop and Strengthen Your Brand Establish industry positioning. Demonstrate your latest equipment, products and services. Gain a Competitive Edge Participation as a sponsor and exhibitor illustrates your company’s prod- ucts and services are aligned with the vision and objectives of NDTA and its members. Interact with Decision Makers and Key Influencers With more than 1,300 projected attendees from the military and govern- ment as well as industry, the NDTA Fall Exposition provides opportunities to develop new business leads while enhancing existing relationships, enabling you to provide the ideas and solutions needed to address ongo- ing challenges to our nation’s defense. Build and strengthen relationships with top and mid-level managers in industry and military and government. Interact with your military and government customers, including the com- manders and leaders of those organizations. Troubleshoot with other key players. The NDTA Fall Exposition provides a cost-effective way to meet face-to- face with the influencers and decision makers who are critical to meeting your goals, while at the same time reinforcing your company image with representatives from a wide array of industries, including: airlines, rail- roads, motor carriers, ocean shippers, transportation consultants, cyber security, security, travel and hospitality, express companies, technology, household goods carriers, labor unions, port authorities, and 3PLs.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
    Jump to Navigation Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States As of January 12, 2017, the USGS maintains a limited number of metadata fields that characterize the Quaternary faults and folds of the United States. For the most up-to-date information, please refer to the interactive fault map. Scipio Valley faults (Class A) No. 2440 Last Review Date: 2004-07-01 Compiled in cooperation with the Utah Geological Survey citation for this record: Black, B.D., Hylland, M.D., and Hecker, S., compilers, 2004, Fault number 2440, Scipio Valley faults, in Quaternary fault and fold database of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey website, https://earthquakes.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults, accessed 12/14/2020 02:57 PM. Synopsis Late Holocene faults on the western side of Scipio Valley in central Utah. Name Fault ID: Refers to fault number 8-19 of Hecker (1993 #642). comments County(s) and MILLARD COUNTY, UTAH State(s) Physiographic BASIN AND RANGE province(s) Reliability of Good Reliability of Good location Compiled at 1:62,500 scale. Comments: Mapped or discussed by Bjorklund and Robinson (1968 #4546), Bucknam and Anderson (1979 #517), Crone and Harding (1984 #4545), Oviatt (1992 #4544), and Hintze and Davis (2002 #6754, 2003 #6741). Fault traces from 1:100,000- scale mapping of Oviatt (1992 #4544). Geologic setting North- and northeast-trending normal faults along the western side of northern Scipio Valley. Scipio Valley is an elongate graben flanked by horst-block mountain ranges: the Pavant Range and Canyon Mountains on the west and the Valley Mountains on the east.
    [Show full text]
  • WRP Utah Military Asset List (MAL)
    WRP Utah Military Asset List (MAL) Within the Western Regional Partnership (WRP) region, there are significant military testing and training installations and ranges. WRP developed summaries from all of the Services and the National Guard, describing the history, missions, and importance of these assets. These summaries use only publicly available information and are written for the policy maker new to military issues and the military savvy person needing specific military information. It is our hope that WRP Partners use these summaries as a tool for land use planning efforts to encourage compatible growth and ensure future mission viability. Incompatible development (encroachment) comes in many forms but for the military, it means those issues that affect their ability to fulfill their mission on land, in the sea, or in the air. These military summaries are for general planning purposes. Attached Utah MAL summaries: Air Force: • Hill Air Force Base • Utah Test and Training Range Army: • Dugway Proving Ground • Tooele Army Depot National Guard: • Utah Air National Guard • Utah Army National Guard Military Asset List 2016 U.S. Air Force: HILL AFB : UTAH Hill Air Force Base is an Air Force Materiel Command base located in northern Utah. Hill is the Air Force's third largest base by population and size. The base is home to many operational and support missions, with the host organization Above: Hill AFB is the largest single-site employer in Utah. (Associated Press being the 75th Photo) Air Base Wing. Left: Two F-16s taxi on runway at Hill AFB. (U.S. Air Force photo) Hill AFB traces its history to when the Army attempted to establish an airmail station in the area MISSION STATEMENT Provide mission-ready Airmen and in the 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground -Water Conditions and Storage in the Central Sevier Valley
    Groundr -Water Conditions and Storage in the Central Sevier Valley, Utah By RICHARD A. YOUNG and CARL H. CARPENTER GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1787 Prepared in cooperation with the Utah State Engineer PROPERTY OF U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GROUND WATER BRANCH TRENTON, N.J. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract_ _______________________________________________________ 1 Introduction._____________________________________________________ 3 Purpose and scope of investigation_____________________________ 3 Location and extent of area____________________________________ 3 Previous work________________________________________________ 4 Personnel and methods of investigation___________---_-____--___ 4 Acknowledgments. ___ _ ______________________________________ 6 Well-numbering system__ ______________________________________ 6 Geography _____________________________________________________ 8 Physiography and drainage.____________________________________ 8 Climate._------_-_-----_-___---_---_--_--_-_-__----__--_-____ 9 Vegetation._ _ ________________________________________________ 10 Population, agriculture, and industry__--_-----__-------_-_------ 12 Geology._________________________________________________________ 12 Generalized stratigraphy________________________________________ 12
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of the Native Trees of Utah Kimball S
    Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series Volume 11 | Number 3 Article 1 9-1970 Distribution of the native trees of Utah Kimball S. Erdman Department of Biology, Slippery Rock State College, Slippery Rock, Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byuscib Part of the Anatomy Commons, Botany Commons, Physiology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Erdman, Kimball S. (1970) "Distribution of the native trees of Utah," Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series: Vol. 11 : No. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byuscib/vol11/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. MU3. CCy.P. ZOOL. LIBRARY DEC 41970 Brigham Young University HARVARD Science Bulletin UNIVERSITY) DISTRIBUTION OF THE NATIVE TREES OF UTAH by Kimball S. Erdman BIOLOGICAL SERIES—VOLUME XI, NUMBER 3 SEPTEMBER 1970 BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY SCIENCE BULLETIN BIOLOGICAL SERIES Editor: Stanley L. Welsh, Department of Botany, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah Members of the Editorial Board: Tipton, Zoology Vernon J. Feeeon L. Anderson, Zoology Joseph R. Murdock, Botany WiLMER W. Tanner, Zoology Ex officio Members: A. Lester Allen, Dean, College of Biological and Agricultural Sciences Ernest L. Olson, Chairman, University Publications The Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series, publishes acceptable papers, particularly large manuscripts, on all phases of biology. Separate numbers and back volumes can be purchased from Pubhcation Sales, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
    [Show full text]