DOCSLIB.ORG

Distribution of the Native Trees of Utah Kimball S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Distribution of the Native Trees of Utah Kimball S Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series Volume 11 | Number 3 Article 1 9-1970 Distribution of the native trees of Utah Kimball S. Erdman Department of Biology, Slippery Rock State College, Slippery Rock, Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byuscib Part of the Anatomy Commons, Botany Commons, Physiology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Erdman, Kimball S. (1970) "Distribution of the native trees of Utah," Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series: Vol. 11 : No. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byuscib/vol11/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. MU3. CCy.P. ZOOL. LIBRARY DEC 41970 Brigham Young University HARVARD Science Bulletin UNIVERSITY) DISTRIBUTION OF THE NATIVE TREES OF UTAH by Kimball S. Erdman BIOLOGICAL SERIES—VOLUME XI, NUMBER 3 SEPTEMBER 1970 BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY SCIENCE BULLETIN BIOLOGICAL SERIES Editor: Stanley L. Welsh, Department of Botany, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah Members of the Editorial Board: Tipton, Zoology Vernon J. Feeeon L. Anderson, Zoology Joseph R. Murdock, Botany WiLMER W. Tanner, Zoology Ex officio Members: A. Lester Allen, Dean, College of Biological and Agricultural Sciences Ernest L. Olson, Chairman, University Publications The Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series, publishes acceptable papers, particularly large manuscripts, on all phases of biology. Separate numbers and back volumes can be purchased from Pubhcation Sales, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah. All remittances should be made payable to Brigham Young University. Orders and materials for hbrary exchange should be directed to the Division of Gifts and Exchange, Brigham Young University Library, Provo, Utah 84601. Brigham Young University Science Bulletin DISTRIBUTION OF THE NATIVE TREES OF UTAH by Kimball S. Erdman BIOLOGICAL SERIES—VOLUME XI, NUMBER 3 SEPTEMBER 1970 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 METHODS 2 SPECIES DISCUSSION 4 DISCUSSION 26 TABLES 27 BIBLIOGRAPHY 33 DISTRIBUTION OF THE NATIVE TREES OF UTAH by Kimball S. Erdman* ABSTRACT Although botanists have been actively collecting in sively supplemented by the field work of the author Utah for well over a century, the distribution of and other botanists. many plants are as yet imperfectly known. This is, in part, due to the scattered nature of Utah herbarium The great diversity of environments due to geog- material. Also the terrain of the state has impeded raphy, physiography, and climatic features of Utah collection in more rugged and remote areas. The has resulted in an interesting tree flora of fifty species present study gathers together the data from the and at least three naturally occurring, recognized major collections of native Utah trees and clarifies hybrids. Although a majority of Utah's trees are our present understanding of tree distributions in the mountain species, a number are strictly desert plants state. The older collection records have been exten- restricted to the Virgin or Colorado River drainages. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS No distribution study of this scope is completed assisted me: Dr. Walter P. Cottam, formerly of the without the assistance of many people. I am grateful University of Utah; Professor Arthur H. Holmgren of to Dr. Bertrand F. Harrison and Dr. Kent H. Utah State University; Mr. Stephen Clark at Weber McKnight for their counsel and advice when this pro- State College; Dr. LeRoy K. Henry of the Carnegie ject was initiated as a master's thesis. Dr. Stanley L. Museum; Dr. Dan Nicholson of the U. S. National Welsh and Dr. Earl M. Christensen have given enthu- Herbarium; Dr. Charles Feddema of the U. S. Forest siastic support to the continuation of this research Service Herbarium; and to Dr. Howard S. Irwin and and have added much to our present revised distri- Dr. Patricia Kern of the New York Botanical Garden. bution maps. They have also been most helpful in the Finally. I would like to acknowledge the contri- criticism of the manuscript. I would like to thank Dr. butions of many botanists during the past hundred Albert E. Little, chief dendrologist of the United years. The time and effort expended in searching out States Forest Service for his help and advice. the plants of Utah's rugged terrain have been monu- I am also grateful to the curators of herbaria who mental. INTRODUCTION Althougli botanists have been active in Utah for treatment of economic trees (1958) and Fowell's well over a hundred years, there is still a real need for work on the silvics of forest trees (1965) which in- accurate surveys and studies of plant distribution. cluded generalized maps of tree distribution. Some This paper is an attempt to summarize the distri- work on tree distribution is included in Choate's bution data for all the native trees of Utah. Forests in Utah (1965). Much more detailed maps of The earliest distribution maps of Utah tree species the genus Pimis were published by Critchfield and are those of Sudworth (1915, 1916, 1917, 1918, Little (1966) and Mirov (1967). Christensen pub- 1934) on the gymnosperms and Salicaceae of the lished distributions of Qiterciis gambeUi and on Rocky Mountains. His maps were based on collec- certain naturalized species. Tamarix, Ulmiis, and tions, reportings, and generalizations based on terrain. Elaeagmis not covered in this paper (1949, 1950, He did not show sites of specimens except on his 1955, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965). Recently Youngberg working maps. Sudworth's maps were later revised (1966) treated the willows of Utah. Unfortunately, and republished by Munns (1938). There have been a however, liis distribution maps are not particularly number of works since then such as Preston's Trees of informative inasmuch as they record only the pres- the Rocky Mountains (1940), Harlow and Harrar's ence of a species in a given county. •"Department of Biology, Slippery Rock State College, Slippery Rock, Pennsylvania. BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY SCIENCE BULLETIN There have been a number of studies of the veg- plants of major reservoir sites in Flaming Gorge and etation of portions of the state both pubUshed and Glen Canyon. Harrison, Welsh, and Moore have pub- unpubHshed. Among these are Graham's study of the lished on the plants of Arches National Monument Uinta Basin (1937), Stanton's thesis on the ecology (1964). and floristics of the Henry Mountains (1931), Wood- bury's paper (1933) on the biotic communities of The selection of species to be included in this Zion National Park, Burke's thesis on the plants of paper was difficult. In Utah thousands of acres are the Wellsville Range (1934), MacMilian's study of the covered with pigmy forest where trees rarely reach 30 floristics and ecology of the Deep Creek Mountains feet in height. One, therefore, is inclined to be liberal (1948), Preece's work on the plant communities of in his definition of a tree. In general, however, if a the Raft River Mountains (1950), Welsh's thesis on species consistently or at least commonly exceeded plant ecology in Dinosaur National Monument 10-15 feet in heiglit, was at least two or three inches (1957), Buchanan's Plant Ecology of Bryce Canyon in diameter, and had a fairly well defined trunk and National Park (1960), Ellison's paper (1954) on the crown, it was included. Plants such as Ribes aurem subalpine vegetation of the Wasatch Plateau, and and Cormis stolonifera, which may be this large but Foster's thesis on major plant communities of the definitely many stemmed and shrubby, are excluded. Great Basin in Utah (1966). Flowers (1959, 1960), Also, plants which are commonly shrubs and rarely Lindsay (1959), Hall (1960), and Woodbury and reach a height of 10 or 15 feet, such as Cowania others (1958, 1959, 1960), published reports on the stansbuhana, are not included. METHODS It has been the general practice of botanists when ium specimens are indicated by dots on the maps. mapping distribution of plants to use base maps Certain of these specimens are cited in the species dis- showing political subdivisions such as states and coun- cussion. There the herbaria are listed according to ties and a few major lakes and rivers. The size of their standard abbreviations; U. S. National Herbar- Utah's counties and the remarkable variation of ium (US), U. S. Forest Service Herbarium (USES), topography within them necessitates a more detailed New York Botanical Gardens (NY), Carnegie Museum base map. I have therefore included rivers and also (CM), Utah State University (UTC), University of major mountain ranges (See Fig. 1 and the accompa- Utah (UT), Brigham Young University (BRY), Weber nying key for the features included). State College (no abbreviation.) The distribution of many of Utah's trees are corre- Sightings and recorded occurrences are indicated lated with mountain ranges with elevations over by an "X." In most cases these represent species dis- 7,000 feet. Generally such areas will have sufficient cussed in theses or in published works, but are not precipitation to support a tree flora more varied than validated by specimens in the herbaria consulted. that of the pigmy forests typical of lower elevations. Sightings represent communications from various bot- Only ranges with several square miles above 7,000 anists to the author. All of these sightings and feet are shown on the map. recorded occurrences should eventually be verified by The location of species as determined from herbar- collections. MOUNTAIN RANGES AND PLATEAUS (highest elevation included); 1. Raft River Mountains 9,892 ft. 2. Grouse Creek Mountains 9,042 ft.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UMNP Mountains Manual 2017
    Mountain Adventures Manual utahmasternaturalist.org June 2017 UMN/Manual/2017-03pr Welcome to Utah Master Naturalist! Utah Master Naturalist was developed to help you initiate or continue your own personal journey to increase your understanding of, and appreciation for, Utah’s amazing natural world. We will explore and learn aBout the major ecosystems of Utah, the plant and animal communities that depend upon those systems, and our role in shaping our past, in determining our future, and as stewards of the land. Utah Master Naturalist is a certification program developed By Utah State University Extension with the partnership of more than 25 other organizations in Utah. The mission of Utah Master Naturalist is to develop well-informed volunteers and professionals who provide education, outreach, and service promoting stewardship of natural resources within their communities. Our goal, then, is to assist you in assisting others to develop a greater appreciation and respect for Utah’s Beautiful natural world. “When we see the land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect.” - Aldo Leopold Participating in a Utah Master Naturalist course provides each of us opportunities to learn not only from the instructors and guest speaKers, But also from each other. We each arrive at a Utah Master Naturalist course with our own rich collection of knowledge and experiences, and we have a unique opportunity to share that Knowledge with each other. This helps us learn and grow not just as individuals, but together as a group with the understanding that there is always more to learn, and more to share.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Hydrology and Climate on the Isotope Geochemistry
    Sedimentology (2007) doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2007.00932.x The influence of hydrology and climate on the isotope geochemistry of playa carbonates: a study from Pilot Valley, NV, USA CYNTHIA M. LIUTKUS* and JAMES D. WRIGHT *Department of Geology, Appalachian State University, ASU Box 32067, Boone, NC 28608, USA (E-mail: [email protected]) Department of Geological Sciences, Rutgers University, 610 Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA ABSTRACT Carbonates often accompany lake and lake-margin deposits in both modern and ancient geological settings. If these carbonates are formed in standing water, their stable isotope values reflect the aquatic chemistry at the time of precipitation and may provide a proxy for determining regional hydrologic conditions. Carbonate rhizoliths and water samples were collected from a playa lake in eastern Nevada. Pilot Valley (43°N) is a closed-basin, remnant playa from the Quaternary desiccation of palaeo-Lake Bonneville. Water is added to the playa margin by free convection of dense brines to the east and forced convection of freshwater off the alluvial fan to the west. Both freshwater and saline springs dot the playa margin at the base of an alluvial fan. Water samples collected from seven springs show a range from )16 to )0Æ2& (Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water), and are consistent with published values. The 18 ) ) d Ocalcite values from rhizolith samples range from 18Æ3to 6Æ7& (Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite), and the average is )12& V-PDB (1 ) r SD 2&). With the 18 exception of samples from Little Salt Spring, the range in the d Ocalcite values collected from the rhizoliths confirms that they form in equilibrium with ambient water conditions on the playa.
    [Show full text]
  • Pines in the Arboretum
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MtJ ARBORETUM REVIEW No. 32-198 PETER C. MOE Pines in the Arboretum Pines are probably the best known of the conifers native to The genus Pinus is divided into hard and soft pines based on the northern hemisphere. They occur naturally from the up­ the hardness of wood, fundamental leaf anatomy, and other lands in the tropics to the limits of tree growth near the Arctic characteristics. The soft or white pines usually have needles in Circle and are widely grown throughout the world for timber clusters of five with one vascular bundle visible in cross sec­ and as ornamentals. In Minnesota we are limited by our cli­ tions. Most hard pines have needles in clusters of two or three mate to the more cold hardy species. This review will be with two vascular bundles visible in cross sections. For the limited to these hardy species, their cultivars, and a few hy­ discussion here, however, this natural division will be ignored brids that are being evaluated at the Arboretum. and an alphabetical listing of species will be used. Where neces­ Pines are readily distinguished from other common conifers sary for clarity, reference will be made to the proper groups by their needle-like leaves borne in clusters of two to five, of particular species. spirally arranged on the stem. Spruce (Picea) and fir (Abies), Of the more than 90 species of pine, the following 31 are or for example, bear single leaves spirally arranged. Larch (Larix) have been grown at the Arboretum. It should be noted that and true cedar (Cedrus) bear their leaves in a dense cluster of many of the following comments and recommendations are indefinite number, whereas juniper (Juniperus) and arborvitae based primarily on observations made at the University of (Thuja) and their related genera usually bear scalelikie or nee­ Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, and plant performance dlelike leaves that are opposite or borne in groups of three.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analyses of Juniperus Species in Turkey and Their Relations with Other Juniperus Based on Cpdna Supervisor: Prof
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF JUNIPERUS L. SPECIES IN TURKEY AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH OTHER JUNIPERS BASED ON cpDNA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY AYSUN DEMET GÜVENDİREN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN BIOLOGY APRIL 2015 Approval of the thesis MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF JUNIPERUS L. SPECIES IN TURKEY AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH OTHER JUNIPERS BASED ON cpDNA submitted by AYSUN DEMET GÜVENDİREN in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Department of Biological Sciences, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Gülbin Dural Ünver Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Orhan Adalı Head of the Department, Biological Sciences Prof. Dr. Zeki Kaya Supervisor, Dept. of Biological Sciences METU Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Musa Doğan Dept. Biological Sciences, METU Prof. Dr. Zeki Kaya Dept. Biological Sciences, METU Prof.Dr. Hayri Duman Biology Dept., Gazi University Prof. Dr. İrfan Kandemir Biology Dept., Ankara University Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sertaç Önde Dept. Biological Sciences, METU Date: iii I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Aysun Demet GÜVENDİREN Signature : iv ABSTRACT MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF JUNIPERUS L. SPECIES IN TURKEY AND THEIR RELATIONS WITH OTHER JUNIPERS BASED ON cpDNA Güvendiren, Aysun Demet Ph.D., Department of Biological Sciences Supervisor: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Juniperus Occidentalis
    Fire Effects Information System (FEIS) FEIS Home Page Table of Contents • SUMMARY INTRODUCTORY DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS FIRE EFFECTS AND MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS APPENDICES REFERENCES Figure 1—Western juniper. Photo by Joseph M. DiTomaso, University of California-Davis, Bugwood.org. Citation: Fryer, Janet L.; Tirmenstein, D. 2019 (revised from 1999). Juniperus occidentalis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: https://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/tree/junocc/all.html [2019, June 26]. Revisions: The Taxonomy, Botanical and Ecological Characteristics, and Fire Effects and Management sections of this Species Review were revised in March 2019. New primary literature and a review by Miller et al. [145] were incorporated and are cited throughout this review. SUMMARY Western juniper occurs in the Pacific Northwest, California, and Nevada. Old-growth western juniper stands that established in presettlement times (before the 1870s) occur primarily on sites of low productivity such as claypan soils, rimrock, outcrops, the edges of mesas, and upper slopes. They are generally very open and often had sparse understories. Western juniper has established and spread onto low slopes and valleys in many areas, especially areas formerly dominated by mountain big sagebrush. These postsettlement stands (woodland transitional communities) are denser than most presettlement and old-growth woodlands. They have substantial shrub understories in early to midsuccession. Western juniper establishes from seed. Seed cones are first produced around 20 years of age, but few are produced until at least 50 years of age. Mature western junipers produce seeds nearly every year, although seed production is highly variable across sites and years.
    [Show full text]
  • Triangulation in Utah 1871-1934
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Bulletin 913 TRIANGULATION IN UTAH 1871-1934 J. G. STAACK Chief Topographic Engineer UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1940 Tor sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 20 cents (paper) CONTENTS Page Introduction ______________________________________________________ 1 Scope of report------__-_-_---_----_------------ --__---__ _ 1 Precision __ _ ________________________ _ __________________ _ ___ 1 Instruments used._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 Station marks___- _ _.__ __ __ _ 2 Datum_-_-_-__ __________________________ ______ ______-___.__ 3 Methods of readjustment..._____.-.__..________.___._._...___.__ 4 Form of results__-.________________________ _.___-_____.______ 5 Arrangement__.______________________________ _ ___ _ ________ 6 Descriptions of stations._______________________________________ 6 Azimuths and distances.__ ____-_.._---_--_________ -____ __ __ ^ 7 Maps.__----__-----_-_---__-_--_-___-_-___-__-__-_-_-___.-.__ 7 Personnel_ _ __-----_-_-_---_---------_--__-____-__-_.--_.___ . 7 Projects 9 Uinta Forest Reserve, 1897-98_ 9 Cottonwood and Park City special quadrangles, 1903____ _ 19 Iron Springs special quadrangle, 1905____________________________ 22 Northeastern Utah, 1909.. -_. 26 Eastern Utah, 1910 - . 30 Logan quadrangle, 1913._________-__-__'_--______-___:_____.____ 42 Uintah County, 1913___-__. 48 Eastern Utah, 1914.. ... _ _ .. 55 Northern Utah, 1915 (Hodgeson)_____-___ __-___-_-_-__-_--. _. 58 Northern Utah, 1915 <Urquhart)_.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory, Assessment and Preliminary Management Planning for Utah’S Sovereign Land Along the Bear River
    INVENTORY, ASSESSMENT AND PRELIMINARY MANAGEMENT PLANNING FOR UTAH’S SOVEREIGN LAND ALONG THE BEAR RIVER Plan B Thesis Project Matthew Coombs, M.S. Bioregional Planning Utah State University College of Natural Resources Department of Environment and Society 2017 ii Copyright © Matthew S. Coombs 2017 All Rights Reserved Maps throughout this document were created using ArcGIS® software by Esri. ArcGIS® and ArcMap™ are the intellectual property of Esri and are used herein under license. Copyright © Esri. All rights reserved. For more information about Esri® software, please visit www.esri.com. iii ABSTRACT Inventory, Assessment and Preliminary Management Planning for Utah’s Sovereign Land along the Bear River by Matthew S. Coombs, Master of Science in Bioregional Planning Utah State University, 2017 Major Professor: Richard E. Toth Department: Environment and Society The Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands (FFSL) is responsible for the management of state-owned sovereign land in Utah, which includes the bed and banks of the Bear River in Cache and Box Elder Counties. The purpose of this project is to provide relevant background information and data to support the future development of a comprehensive management plan for the Bear River. This project develops a methodology and process to describe the Bear River Corridor, summarizes and integrates existing information regarding important biophysical and socio- cultural attributes of the river, delineates lands along the river into identified management classes, and recommends management goals and objectives to be carried forward into the future development of a comprehensive management plan. While this project is not the most comprehensive or detailed report for any individual attribute of the Bear River, it is currently the most comprehensive resource addressing sovereign lands along the Bear River.
    [Show full text]
  • Douglas- Fir Limber Pine Lodgepole Pine Ponderosa Pine Blue Spruce
    NAME ORIGIN BARK FEMALE CONES NEEDLES WHERE USES TRIVIA Named by Smooth gray bark To 4ÂÂ long, Soft, flat, 2-sided, Found on north or Railroad crossties, State tree of Scottish botanist on young trees yellowish to light 1¼″ long and south-facing slopes, mine timbers, for Oregon. David Douglas. with numerous brown hanging cones rounded at the tip. in shady ravines and building ships and The Latin name DOUGLAS- Fir is from the resin scars. with uniquely 3- Dark yellow green or on rocky slopes boats, construction psuedotsuga Middle English pointed bracts blue green. Shortly where the soil is lumber, plywood, means FIR firre and Old protruding from cone stalked spreading fairly deep. telephone poles, ÂÂfalse Psuedotsuga English fyrh. scales like a snakes- mostly in two rows. fencing, railroad-car fir.ÂÂ menziesii tongue. Single small groove construction, boxes Can drop 2 on topside of needles and crates, flooring, million seeds in and single white line furniture, ladders a good year. on underside of and pulpwood. needles. Pine is from the Light gray to Big (to 9ÂÂ long) Stout in clusters of 5 Found on rocky, Lumber, railroad Cones start to LIMBER Latin pinus and blackish brown. cylindrical, greenish needles, to 3″ long. gravelly slopes, cross ties, poles, appear after the the Old English Smooth and silvery brown, with thick, Straight or slightly ridges and peaks. turpentine, tar and tree reaches 20 PINE pin. gray on young broad scales. Cone curved, not sticky to fuel. years of age. Pinus flexilis trees. scales lack prickles. the touch. Dark green. Pine is from the Bark is grayish or Light yellow brown, Stout, twisted Found in well Lumber, knotty Many Plains Latin pinus and light brown, thin reddish or dark green, needles, mostly in drained soils, dry pine paneling, Indian tribes the Old English and with many lopsided cones to pairs, to 2½″ long.
    [Show full text]
  • Scipio Irrigation Company Ivie Creek Pipeline Project - Watersmart
    Draft Environmental Assessment Scipio Irrigation Company Ivie Creek Pipeline Project - WaterSMART PRO-EA-16-026 Upper Colorado Region Provo Area Office Provo, Utah U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office Provo, Utah May 2017 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior protects and manages the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provides scientific and other information about those resources; and honors its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Draft Environmental Assessment Scipio Irrigation Company Ivie Creek Pipeline Project – WaterSMART Upper Colorado Region Provo Area Office Provo, Utah Interdisciplinary Team Leader Jared Baxter Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office 302 East 1860 South Provo, UT 84606 801-379-1081 [email protected] U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office Provo, Utah May 2017 Contents Page Chapter 1 Purpose of and Need for Proposed Action ...................................... 1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background .......................................................................................... 1 1.3 Purpose of and Need for Proposed Action ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trees and Shrubs: Drought, Heat, Cold Tolerant Species
    Trees and Shrubs: Drought, Heat, Cold Tolerant Species This list of trees and shrubs is intended to provide guidance for choosing a tree or shrub which will grow in Las Vegas, New Mexico yards. This list of species is for residential yards, not City Parks which are regularly watered during the summer. Purpose. Before selecting a tree, think about the purposes of the tree you are going to plant: do you want it for shade, privacy screen, windbreak, beauty, wildlife value? Due to unpredictable late frosts, fruit producing trees are not recommended as a food source. For more information about what to look for buying a tree, watering, correct planting, watering, and pruning methods, read the Tree Owner’s Manual. A tree is an investment in both time and money. You can find the manual at http://na.fs.fed.us/pubs/uf/tom_natl/tree_owners_manual_web_res.pdf Site selection. Before buying a tree, determine where you are going to plant it, based on the purpose of the tree and these additional factors. Deciduous trees lose their leaves in the winter; if you plant them on the south and west side of your home, they will help with cooling during the summer. Because they lose their leaves, they allow winter sun to help warm your house. Reduce winds by planting trees and shrubs on the windy side of your home. Do not plant a tall tree near or under electric lines (height and width are listed in the descriptions). PNM recommends that a tree which is 25 feet tall at maturity be at least 15 feet from a power line; a 30 foot tall tree should be at least 30 feet away from a power line.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree and Tree-Like Species of Mexico: Asteraceae, Leguminosae, and Rubiaceae
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 84: 439-470, 2013 Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 84: 439-470, 2013 DOI: 10.7550/rmb.32013 DOI: 10.7550/rmb.32013439 Tree and tree-like species of Mexico: Asteraceae, Leguminosae, and Rubiaceae Especies arbóreas y arborescentes de México: Asteraceae, Leguminosae y Rubiaceae Martin Ricker , Héctor M. Hernández, Mario Sousa and Helga Ochoterena Herbario Nacional de México, Departamento de Botánica, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Apartado postal 70- 233, 04510 México D. F., Mexico. [email protected] Abstract. Trees or tree-like plants are defined here broadly as perennial, self-supporting plants with a total height of at least 5 m (without ascending leaves or inflorescences), and with one or several erect stems with a diameter of at least 10 cm. We continue our compilation of an updated list of all native Mexican tree species with the dicotyledonous families Asteraceae (36 species, 39% endemic), Leguminosae with its 3 subfamilies (449 species, 41% endemic), and Rubiaceae (134 species, 24% endemic). The tallest tree species reach 20 m in the Asteraceae, 70 m in the Leguminosae, and also 70 m in the Rubiaceae. The species-richest genus is Lonchocarpus with 67 tree species in Mexico. Three legume genera are endemic to Mexico (Conzattia, Hesperothamnus, and Heteroflorum). The appendix lists all species, including their original publication, references of taxonomic revisions, existence of subspecies or varieties, maximum height in Mexico, and endemism status. Key words: biodiversity, flora, tree definition. Resumen. Las plantas arbóreas o arborescentes se definen aquí en un sentido amplio como plantas perennes que se pueden sostener por sí solas, con una altura total de al menos 5 m (sin considerar hojas o inflorescencias ascendentes) y con uno o varios tallos erectos de un diámetro de al menos 10 cm.
    [Show full text]