Plants & Natural Communities of Concern

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Appendix A—Plant and Natural Communities at the Subregional Scale Page 1 of 39 Table A-1. Plant species of concern identified by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program within the Colorado portion of the Subregional Scale. The plant species are arranged in alphabetical order by scientific name within the counties in which they occur.

128

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Rifle Creek Watershed Assessment
Rifle Creek Watershed Assessment February 2019 Prepared By Sponsored By Table of Contents Executive Summary 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………2 1.1 Purpose……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………2 1.2 Study Area Description……………………………………………………………………………………………..2 2.0 Characteristics of Key Watershed Elements……………………………………………………………….…3 2.1 Hydrology………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 2.2 Land Use……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………4 2.3 Geology and Soils………………………………………………………………………………………………………5 2.4 Stream Channel and Riparian Condition…………………………………………………………………...6 3.0 Water Quality – Known Concerns and Issues…………………………………………………………………6 3.1 303(d) Listings……………………………………………………………………………………………………………6 3.2 Salinity……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….9 3.3 Fish and Wildlife………………………………………………………………………………………………………..10 4.0 Methods of Field Investigation……………………………………………………………………………………..11 4.1 Timing………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..11 4.2 Site Selection……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..11 4.3 Site Notes…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..12 4.4 Sample Preparation and Collection…………………………………………………………………………….12 4.5 Field Measurements…………………………………………………………………………………………………..12 4.6 Laboratory Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………….13 4.7 GIS and Data Uploading………………………………………………………………………………………………15 4.8 Mass Loading………………………………………………………………………………………………………………15 4.9 Data Representation………………………………………………………………………………………..…………15 5.0 Data Synthesis………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..15
[Show full text]
USGS Open-File Report 2005-1190, Table 1
TABLE 1 GEOLOGIC FIELD-TRAINING OF NASA ASTRONAUTS BETWEEN JANUARY 1963 AND NOVEMBER 1972 The following is a year-by-year listing of the astronaut geologic field training trips planned and led by personnel from the U.S. Geological Survey’s Branches of Astrogeology and Surface Planetary Exploration, in collaboration with the Geology Group at the Manned Spacecraft Center, Houston, Texas at the request of NASA between January 1963 and November 1972. Regional geologic experts from the U.S. Geological Survey and other governmental organizations and universities s also played vital roles in these exercises. [The early training (between 1963 and 1967) involved a rather large contingent of astronauts from NASA groups 1, 2, and 3. For another listing of the astronaut geologic training trips and exercises, including all attending and the general purposed of the exercise, the reader is referred to the following website containing a contribution by William Phinney (Phinney, book submitted to NASA/JSC; also http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/ap-geotrips.pdf).] 1963 16-18 January 1963: Meteor Crater and San Francisco Volcanic Field near Flagstaff, Arizona (9 astronauts). Among the nine astronaut trainees in Flagstaff for that initial astronaut geologic training exercise was Neil Armstrong--who would become the first man to step foot on the Moon during the historic Apollo 11 mission in July 1969! The other astronauts present included Frank Borman (Apollo 8), Charles "Pete" Conrad (Apollo 12), James Lovell (Apollo 8 and the near-tragic Apollo 13), James McDivitt, Elliot See (killed later in a plane crash), Thomas Stafford (Apollo 10), Edward White (later killed in the tragic Apollo 1 fire at Cape Canaveral), and John Young (Apollo 16).
[Show full text]
Travel Summary
Travel Summary – All Trips and Day Trips Retirement 2016-2020 Trips (28) • Relatives 2016-A (R16A), September 30-October 20, 2016, 21 days, 441 photos • Anza-Borrego Desert 2016-A (A16A), November 13-18, 2016, 6 days, 711 photos • Arizona 2017-A (A17A), March 19-24, 2017, 6 days, 692 photos • Utah 2017-A (U17A), April 8-23, 2017, 16 days, 2214 photos • Tonopah 2017-A (T17A), May 14-19, 2017, 6 days, 820 photos • Nevada 2017-A (N17A), June 25-28, 2017, 4 days, 515 photos • New Mexico 2017-A (M17A), July 13-26, 2017, 14 days, 1834 photos • Great Basin 2017-A (B17A), August 13-21, 2017, 9 days, 974 photos • Kanab 2017-A (K17A), August 27-29, 2017, 3 days, 172 photos • Fort Worth 2017-A (F17A), September 16-29, 2017, 14 days, 977 photos • Relatives 2017-A (R17A), October 7-27, 2017, 21 days, 861 photos • Arizona 2018-A (A18A), February 12-17, 2018, 6 days, 403 photos • Mojave Desert 2018-A (M18A), March 14-19, 2018, 6 days, 682 photos • Utah 2018-A (U18A), April 11-27, 2018, 17 days, 1684 photos • Europe 2018-A (E18A), June 27-July 25, 2018, 29 days, 3800 photos • Kanab 2018-A (K18A), August 6-8, 2018, 3 days, 28 photos • California 2018-A (C18A), September 5-15, 2018, 11 days, 913 photos • Relatives 2018-A (R18A), October 1-19, 2018, 19 days, 698 photos • Arizona 2019-A (A19A), February 18-20, 2019, 3 days, 127 photos • Texas 2019-A (T19A), March 18-April 1, 2019, 15 days, 973 photos • Death Valley 2019-A (D19A), April 4-5, 2019, 2 days, 177 photos • Utah 2019-A (U19A), April 19-May 3, 2019, 15 days, 1482 photos • Europe 2019-A (E19A), July
[Show full text]
1922 Elizabeth T
co.rYRIG HT, 192' The Moootainetro !scot1oror,d The MOUNTAINEER VOLUME FIFTEEN Number One D EC E M BER 15, 1 9 2 2 ffiount Adams, ffiount St. Helens and the (!oat Rocks I ncoq)Ora,tecl 1913 Organized 190!i EDITORlAL ST AitF 1922 Elizabeth T. Kirk,vood, Eclttor Margaret W. Hazard, Associate Editor· Fairman B. L�e, Publication Manager Arthur L. Loveless Effie L. Chapman Subsc1·iption Price. $2.00 per year. Annual ·(onl�') Se,·ent�·-Five Cents. Published by The Mountaineers lncorJ,orated Seattle, Washington Enlerecl as second-class matter December 15, 19t0. at the Post Office . at . eattle, "\Yash., under the .-\0t of March 3. 1879. .... I MOUNT ADAMS lllobcl Furrs AND REFLEC'rION POOL .. <§rtttings from Aristibes (. Jhoutribes Author of "ll3ith the <6obs on lltount ®l!!mµus" �. • � J� �·,,. ., .. e,..:,L....._d.L.. F_,,,.... cL.. ��-_, _..__ f.. pt",- 1-� r�._ '-';a_ ..ll.-�· t'� 1- tt.. �ti.. ..._.._....L- -.L.--e-- a';. ��c..L. 41- �. C4v(, � � �·,,-- �JL.,�f w/U. J/,--«---fi:( -A- -tr·�� , : 'JJ! -, Y .,..._, e� .,...,____,� � � t-..__., ,..._ -u..,·,- .,..,_, ;-:.. � --r J /-e,-i L,J i-.,( '"'; 1..........,.- e..r- ,';z__ /-t.-.--,r� ;.,-.,.....__ � � ..-...,.,-<. ,.,.f--· :tL. ��- ''F.....- ,',L � .,.__ � 'f- f-� --"- ��7 � �. � �;')'... f ><- -a.c__ c/ � r v-f'.fl,'7'71.. I /!,,-e..-,K-// ,l...,"4/YL... t:l,._ c.J.� J..,_-...A 'f ',y-r/� �- lL.. ��•-/IC,/ ,V l j I '/ ;· , CONTENTS i Page Greetings .......................................................................tlristicles }!}, Phoiitricles ........ r The Mount Adams, Mount St. Helens, and the Goat Rocks Outing .......................................... B1/.ith Page Bennett 9 1 Selected References from Preceding Mount Adams and Mount St.
[Show full text]
R Media Brokerage Specialist Radio and TV
California -San Bernardino (Los Angeles) KERN 0 Delano :s SAN BERNARDINO KHOF-TV WascO Ridgecresto ero Ch. 30 Oildales Bakersfield® ris Obispo Technical Facilities: Channel No. 30 °Lamont Arvin° (566 -572 MHz). Authorized power: or.hachapi horizon- 1120 -kw max. & 269 -kw SANTA BARSARA tal visual, 112 -kw max. & 26.9 -kw a ()Barstow VENTURA horizontal aural. Antenna: 2340 - 1poc ft. above ay. terrain, 143 -ft. above caster Santa Barbara ground, 5533 -ft. above sea level. almdale° ADE B GRADE A Latitude 34° 11' 15" Ventura San Fernando Longitude 117` 41' 58" 0 Oxnar e Glendale Transmitter: Sunset Ridge, 5.5 -mi. ;r 1 Port Huene 4 Bt rbank ®®PaSaden N of Claremont, Cal. omona Los Wiles® von 0 E TV tape: Recording facilities. Long Beach ORANGE Riverside *Santa Ana Pa Color: Live, film, slide & tape. Costa Mea ° aguna Hemet° Newport Bea News Wire Service: AP. Beach FM Affiliate: KHOF, 100 -kw, 99.5 MHz (No. 258), 240 -ft. O Oceans! ()Vista Arbitron Data: Not available. Carlsba oEs Ido oCalir Leucadi Map Note: Contours calculated by re- oBrc vised Sec. 73.699 of FCC Rules not available. ^oop El EI Centro® San Ding Cajon Lemon Grove Coronado +rion Cit SCALE OF MILES Imperial Beach r. a Vista Me 0 50 loo guano KHOF -TV Ref: FCC File No. BMPCT -6656 Granted 5/10/65 c0 American Map Co., Inc., N.Y., No. 14244 KHOF -TV Began Operation: Oct. 12, 1969. Network Service: None, independent. Represented (legal) by Cohen & Berfield. Licensee: Faith Center, 1615 S. Glendale Ave., Glendale, Cal. Personnel: (91205).
[Show full text]
Codornices Creek Watershed Restoration Action Plan
Codornices Creek Watershed Restoration Action Plan Prepared for the Urban Creeks Council By Kier Associates Fisheries and Watershed Professionals 207 Second Street, Ste. B Sausalito, CA 94965 November, 2003 The Codornices Creek watershed assessment and salmonid restoration planning project, the results of which are reported here, was funded by the Watershed Program of the California Bay-Delta Authority, through Contract No. 4600001722 between the California Department of Water Resources and the Urban Creeks Council. The Urban Creeks Council is a non-profit organization working to preserve, protect, and restore urban streams and their riparian habitat. The Urban Creeks Council may be reached at 1250 Addison Street, Ste. 107, Berkeley, CA 94702 (510- 540-6669). Table of Contents Executive Summary..................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................... ii Introduction Fish and stream habitat records................................................................................................. 1 Other Codornices Creek studies................................................................................................ 1 Methods: How Each Element of the Project Was Undertaken Fish population assessment methods ........................................................................................ 2 Salmonid habitat assessment methods.....................................................................................
[Show full text]
Evaluation of Hanging Lake
Evaluation of Hanging Lake Garfield County, Colorado for its Merit in Meeting National Significance Criteria as a National Natural Landmark in Representing Lakes, Ponds and Wetlands in the Southern Rocky Mountain Province prepared by Karin Decker Colorado Natural Heritage Program 1474 Campus Delivery Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 August 27, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. 2 LISTS OF TABLES AND FIGURES ............................................................................. 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 5 Source of Site Proposal ................................................................................................... 5 Evaluator(s) ..................................................................................................................... 5 Scope of Evaluation ........................................................................................................ 5 PNNL SITE DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................... 5 Brief Overview ...............................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico
Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico William H. Romme, M. Lisa Floyd, David Hanna with contributions by Elisabeth J. Bartlett, Michele Crist, Dan Green, Henri D. Grissino-Mayer, J. Page Lindsey, Kevin McGarigal, & Jeffery S.Redders Produced by the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado State University, and Region 2 of the U.S. Forest Service May 12, 2009 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY … p 5 AUTHORS’ AFFILIATIONS … p 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS … p 16 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION A. Objectives and Organization of This Report … p 17 B. Overview of Physical Geography and Vegetation … p 19 C. Climate Variability in Space and Time … p 21 1. Geographic Patterns in Climate 2. Long-Term Variability in Climate D. Reference Conditions: Concept and Application … p 25 1. Historical Range of Variability (HRV) Concept 2. The Reference Period for this Analysis 3. Human Residents and Influences during the Reference Period E. Overview of Integrated Ecosystem Management … p 30 F. Literature Cited … p 34 CHAPTER II. PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS A. Vegetation Structure and Composition … p 39 B. Reference Conditions … p 40 1. Reference Period Fire Regimes 2. Other agents of disturbance 3. Pre-1870 stand structures C. Legacies of Euro-American Settlement and Current Conditions … p 67 1. Logging (“High-Grading”) in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 2. Excessive Livestock Grazing in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 3. Fire Exclusion Since the Late 1800s 4. Interactions: Logging, Grazing, Fire, Climate, and the Forests of Today D. Summary … p 83 E. Literature Cited … p 84 CHAPTER III.
[Show full text]
École De Paris Tableaux Modernes Photographies Aviation Conquête Spatiale
EXPERTISES – VENTES AUX ENCHÈRES École de Paris Tableaux modernes Photographies Aviation Conquête spatiale Paris - Hôtel Drouot - 8 et 9 octobre 2019 EXPERTISES – VENTES AUX ENCHÈRES VENTE AUX ENCHÈRES PUBLIQUES Hôtel Drouot Richelieu salle 6 9, rue Drouot à Paris IXe Mardi 8 octobre 2019 à 14 h École de Paris Tableaux Modernes Mercredi 9 octobre 2019 à 14 h Photographies Aviation Conquête spatiale Reproduction des œuvres sur : www.ogerblanchet.fr - www.jj-mathias.fr Expositions publiques : Le lundi 7 octobre de 11 h à 18 heures Le mardi 8 octobre de 11 h à 12 heures Le mercredi 9 octobre de 11 h à 12 heures EXPERTISES – VENTES AUX ENCHÈRES 22 rue Drouot - 75009 Paris 01 42 46 96 95 - [email protected] ASSISTÉS DES EXPERTS Pour les lots 5 à 10 Pour l’École de Paris Éric SCHOELLER Christophe ZAGRODKI Tél. +33 (0)6 11 86 39 64 Tél. +33 (0)1 43 21 44 52 [email protected] [email protected] Pour les lots 38, 82 à 136, 252, 253, 281 à 287, Pour les autographes et manuscrits 289 à 314 M. Jean-Emmanuel RAUX Cabinet PERAZZONE-BRUN Arts et Autographes 4, rue Favart - 75002 9 rue de l’Odéon - 75006 Paris Tél. +33 (0)1 42 60 45 45 01 43 25 60 48 - [email protected] Pour les photographies M. Serge PLANTUREUX 80 Rue Taitbout - 75009 Paris Tél. +33 (0)6 50 85 60 74 - [email protected] AVERTISSEMENT Concernant l’état des œuvres décrites dans le présent catalogue, des rapports d’état sont disponibles sur simple demande Pour les estampes, sauf mention contraire, les dimensions sont celles de la cuvette pour les gravures et du sujet pour les lithographies J.J.
[Show full text]
Colorado Fourteeners Checklist
Colorado Fourteeners Checklist Rank Mountain Peak Mountain Range Elevation Date Climbed 1 Mount Elbert Sawatch Range 14,440 ft 2 Mount Massive Sawatch Range 14,428 ft 3 Mount Harvard Sawatch Range 14,421 ft 4 Blanca Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,351 ft 5 La Plata Peak Sawatch Range 14,343 ft 6 Uncompahgre Peak San Juan Mountains 14,321 ft 7 Crestone Peak Sangre de Cristo Range 14,300 ft 8 Mount Lincoln Mosquito Range 14,293 ft 9 Castle Peak Elk Mountains 14,279 ft 10 Grays Peak Front Range 14,278 ft 11 Mount Antero Sawatch Range 14,276 ft 12 Torreys Peak Front Range 14,275 ft 13 Quandary Peak Mosquito Range 14,271 ft 14 Mount Evans Front Range 14,271 ft 15 Longs Peak Front Range 14,259 ft 16 Mount Wilson San Miguel Mountains 14,252 ft 17 Mount Shavano Sawatch Range 14,231 ft 18 Mount Princeton Sawatch Range 14,204 ft 19 Mount Belford Sawatch Range 14,203 ft 20 Crestone Needle Sangre de Cristo Range 14,203 ft 21 Mount Yale Sawatch Range 14,200 ft 22 Mount Bross Mosquito Range 14,178 ft 23 Kit Carson Mountain Sangre de Cristo Range 14,171 ft 24 Maroon Peak Elk Mountains 14,163 ft 25 Tabeguache Peak Sawatch Range 14,162 ft 26 Mount Oxford Collegiate Peaks 14,160 ft 27 Mount Sneffels Sneffels Range 14,158 ft 28 Mount Democrat Mosquito Range 14,155 ft 29 Capitol Peak Elk Mountains 14,137 ft 30 Pikes Peak Front Range 14,115 ft 31 Snowmass Mountain Elk Mountains 14,099 ft 32 Windom Peak Needle Mountains 14,093 ft 33 Mount Eolus San Juan Mountains 14,090 ft 34 Challenger Point Sangre de Cristo Range 14,087 ft 35 Mount Columbia Sawatch Range
[Show full text]
Tidal Marsh Recovery Plan Habitat Creation Or Enhancement Project Within 5 Miles of OAK
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California California clapper rail Suaeda californica Cirsium hydrophilum Chloropyron molle Salt marsh harvest mouse (Rallus longirostris (California sea-blite) var. hydrophilum ssp. molle (Reithrodontomys obsoletus) (Suisun thistle) (soft bird’s-beak) raviventris) Volume II Appendices Tidal marsh at China Camp State Park. VII. APPENDICES Appendix A Species referred to in this recovery plan……………....…………………….3 Appendix B Recovery Priority Ranking System for Endangered and Threatened Species..........................................................................................................11 Appendix C Species of Concern or Regional Conservation Significance in Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California….......................................13 Appendix D Agencies, organizations, and websites involved with tidal marsh Recovery.................................................................................................... 189 Appendix E Environmental contaminants in San Francisco Bay...................................193 Appendix F Population Persistence Modeling for Recovery Plan for Tidal Marsh Ecosystems of Northern and Central California with Intial Application to California clapper rail …............................................................................209 Appendix G Glossary……………......................................................................………229 Appendix H Summary of Major Public Comments and Service
[Show full text]
Planning for Native Oyster Restoration in San Francisco Bay. Final Report to California Coastal Conservancy Agreement
Planning for Native Oyster Restoration in San Francisco Bay Final Report to California Coastal Conservancy Agreement # 05-134 Edwin Grosholza, Jim Mooreb, Chela Zabina, Sarikka Attoea and Rena Obernoltea aDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy University of California, Davis bCalifornia Department of Fish and Game Funding provided by the California Ocean Protection Council Introduction Historically, native Olympia oysters Ostreola conchaphila (=Ostrea lurida) (Turgeon et al. 1998) were an abundant and ecologically important part of the fauna in West Coast estuaries and an important fishery (Barnett 1963, Baker 1995). Unfortunately, the popularity of the fishery that began in the 1850s resulted in the complete collapse of native oyster populations along the west coast of the U.S. during the late 19th and early 20th centuries (Barnett 1963, Baker 1995). Not only was the fishery lost, but so were the key ecosystem services provided by native oysters. Studies of oysters in estuaries in the eastern U.S. have shown that native oyster reefs (Crassostrea virginica) act as a “foundation species” by creating a refuge from predators and physical stress as well as a food source resulting in increased local diversity of fishes and invertebrates (Zimmerman 1989, Lenihan 1999, Micheli and Peterson 1999, Lenihan et al. 2001). In the largely unstructured, soft-sediment habitats of West Coast estuaries, aggregations of native oysters were likely to have provided similar functions and have been shown to increase invertebrate species richness (Kimbro and Grosholz 2006). The introduction of exotic Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas) from Asia in the early 20th century provided a successful replacement for the native oyster fishery.
[Show full text]