Predicting SAR Response and Operational Requirements Based on NZ Population Projections Through to 2030 Volume 1: Baselines &

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Predicting SAR Response and Operational Requirements Based on NZ Population Projections Through to 2030 Volume 1: Baselines & Study report: Predicting SAR response and operational requirements based on NZ population projections through to 2030 Volume 1: Baselines & trends, demand analysis and detailed projections Prepared for: Search & Rescue Institute New Zealand Ltd. Research sponsored by New Zealand Oil & Gas By: Gordon Cessford and Bronek Kazmierow Date: 20 August 2010 B Kazmierow Recreation & Tourism Consulting E: [email protected]; Ph: 04 234 1540; Cell: 021 140 1841 W: http://home.clear.net.nz/pages/bronek/home/ PO Box 58082, Porirua 5245 10 The Crowsnest, Whitby, Porirua Citation Cessford, G.R., Kazmierow, B.J. (2010). Predicting SAR response and operational requirements based on NZ population projections through to 2030. Volume 1: Baselines & trends, demand analysis and detailed projections. Prepared for SARINZ & NZ Oil & Gas by B. Kazmierow Recreation & Tourism Consulting, New Zealand. Prepared for SARINZ Ltd., NZ - www.sarinz.com NZ Oil & Gas – www.nzog.com Prepared by Gordon Cessford and Bronek Kazmierow Date 20 August 2010 Contacts B Kazmierow – Recreation & Tourism Consulting [email protected] Table of Contents1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ IV 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2. OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................................................... 1 3. REVIEW OF EXISTING INFORMATION ............................................................................................... 3 3.1. SUMMARY CONCLUSIONS DRAWN FROM THE LITERATURE .......................................................................... 3 3.2. APPROACH ....................................................................................................................................... 3 3.3. DEMAND-SIDE RESEARCH .................................................................................................................... 4 3.3.1. DEMAND FOR SAR ............................................................................................................................ 4 3.3.2. DEMAND FOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES .................................................................................................. 5 3.3.3. DEMAND FOR TOURISM ACTIVITIES ....................................................................................................... 6 3.3.4. NON-RECREATION DEMAND FOR SAR ................................................................................................... 7 3.4. SUPPLY-SIDE RESEARCH....................................................................................................................... 8 3.4.1. NATIONAL LEVEL VOLUNTEER DATA ....................................................................................................... 8 3.4.2. SAR-SPECIFIC VOLUNTEER RESEARCH ................................................................................................... 8 3.4.3. EMERGENCY SERVICE VOLUNTEER RESEARCH .......................................................................................... 9 3.4.4. OTHER USEFUL VOLUNTEER RESEARCH ................................................................................................. 11 3.4.5. TECHNOLOGY IMPACT RESEARCH (ON VOLUNTEER SUPPLY) ..................................................................... 11 3.5. SUPPLY AND DEMAND – LOOKING FORWARD ........................................................................................ 12 4. METHODS ...................................................................................................................................... 14 4.1. METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK AND APPROACH .................................................................................. 14 4.2. CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS INFLUENCING SAR INCIDENTS .......................................... 14 4.3. REGIONAL FOCUS – REGIONAL BOUNDARY CONCORDANCES ..................................................................... 16 4.4. PRINCIPLE DATA SOURCES AND LIMITATIONS ......................................................................................... 19 4.4.1. METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS .................................................................................................. 19 4.4.2. RESEARCH APPROACH ....................................................................................................................... 21 4.4.3. CENSUS DATA ................................................................................................................................. 22 4.4.4. SAR EXPERT OPINIONS ON KEY TRENDS ................................................................................................ 22 4.5. APPLICATION OF THE MODEL FOR SPECIFIC INCIDENT TYPES ...................................................................... 23 4.5.1. ASSUMPTIONS UNDERPINNING PROJECTIONS ........................................................................................ 23 4.5.2. NOTES ON INTERPRETING PROJECTIONS ................................................................................................ 24 5. BASELINES & TRENDS ..................................................................................................................... 25 5.1. POPULATION DEMOGRAPHICS (FOR CONSIDERATION WITH BOTH DEMAND AND SUPPLY SIDES) ....................... 25 5.1.1. REGIONAL POPULATION .................................................................................................................... 25 5.1.2. SEX ............................................................................................................................................... 27 5.1.3. AGE .............................................................................................................................................. 27 5.1.4. ETHNICITY ...................................................................................................................................... 28 5.1.5. BIRTHPLACE ................................................................................................................................... 31 5.1.6. ACCESS TO TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS......................................................................................... 31 5.1.7. ACCESS TO MOTOR-VEHICLES ............................................................................................................. 34 5.1.8. LABOUR FORCE STATUS ..................................................................................................................... 36 5.1.9. OCCUPATION .................................................................................................................................. 37 5.1.10. FAMILY TYPE .............................................................................................................................. 39 5.2. INCIDENT PATTERNS ......................................................................................................................... 40 5.2.1. P130 POLICE PROFILE – LAND-BASED SAR INCIDENTS ........................................................................... 40 5.2.2. LAND-BASED SAR SUBJECT PROFILES ................................................................................................... 52 5.2.3. P130 POLICE PROFILE – MARINE INCIDENTS ...................................................................................... 68 5.2.4. SUBJECT PROFILE - MARINE ............................................................................................................... 78 1 Note that full lists of tables and figures are provided at the end of this document. 5.3. SPECIFIC SUB-GROUP PROFILES ........................................................................................................... 92 5.3.1. SUBJECT PROFILE – ALZHEIMER’S/DEMENTIA ....................................................................................... 94 5.3.2. SUBJECT PROFILE – 65+ AGE GROUP (MARINE AND LAND) ................................................................ 102 5.3.3. SUBJECT PROFILE – DESPONDENT ..................................................................................................... 110 5.3.4. SUBJECT PROFILE – TRAMPERS ......................................................................................................... 116 5.3.5. SUBJECT PROFILE – WALKERS .......................................................................................................... 129 5.3.6. SUBJECT PROFILE – HUNTERS........................................................................................................... 142 5.3.7. SUBJECT PROFILE – SHORE-BASED MARINE ........................................................................................ 155 5.3.8. SUBJECT PROFILE – TOURISTS .......................................................................................................... 161 6. PROJECTION SOURCES ................................................................................................................. 178 6.1. NZ POPULATION PROJECTIONS ......................................................................................................... 178 6.1.1. REGIONAL AGE PROFILE ..................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Auckland & Northland Region Calendar
    Auckland & Northland Region Calendar Please refer to calendars on the Gymnastics NZ website for education registrations and competition entry forms and competitions in other regions. Date GymSport Competition/ Course STEP/Level/Pre-requsite Venue March 3-4 March – New Date MAG + WAG Junior Coach Artistic coaches who have WAG + MAG Counties Manukau GC Registrations close 21 Feb Course completed Elementary TUM Elementary Coach Coaches have completed Needs to be re-scheduled TUM Auckland?/Whangarei? course Foundation Coach 9-11 March – New Date Rhythmic coaches who have RG RG Junior Coach Course Counties Manukau GC Registrations close 28 Feb completed Elementary coach 25 March Coaches who have completed Understanding Movement Registrations close 14 All Codes Online Understanding Howick GC Practical March Movement 25 REC competition North Harbour Gymfest MAG / WAG recreational North Harbour GC 30 March – 2 April Easter Holiday April Coaches have completed TBC TRA TRA Elementary Coach Course Auckland Foundation Coach 7-8 Coaches have completed Hamilton, TBC (not run in RG RG Elementary Coach course Registrations close 28 Mar Foundation Coach Auckland/Northland) Eastern Suburbs Tumbling ESGC routines Tumbling, not 8 TUM Eastern Suburbs GC festival GNZ routines 8 XTND Group Management 2018 Year 1 students Counties Manukau GC Registrations close 28 Mar 8 XTND Trampoline Year 2 students Counties Manukau GC Registrations close 28 Mar 14-15 – New Date TRA Junior & Senior Judge TRA Trampoline Judges Icon Registrations close 4 April Course 14-15 –
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Areas of Whangarei Ecological District
    Natural areas of Whangarei Ecological District Reconnaissance Survey Report for the Protected Natural Areas Programme NEW ZEALAND PROTECTED NATURAL AREAS PROGRAMME Diana Manning Published by Department of Conservation Northland Conservancy P.O. Box 842 Whangarei, New Zealand © Crown copyright 2001 This report may be freely copied provided that the Department of Conservation is acknowledged as the source of the information. Cover photograph: Maungatapere Mountain. Topographic base maps reproduced under the Land Information New Zealand Map Authority 1991/42: Crown Copyright Reserved. ISSN: 0112-9252 ISBN: 0-478-22076-6 Cataloguing-in-Publication data Manning, Diana Natural areas of Whangarei Ecological District : reconnaissance survey report for the Protected Natural Areas Programme / Diana Manning. Whangarei, N.Z. : Dept. of Conservation, Northland Conservancy, 2001. 1 v. ; 30 cm. (New Zealand Protected Natural Areas Programme, 0112- 9252) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0478220766. 1. Ecological surveysNew ZealandNorthland Region. 2. Natural areasNew ZealandNorthland Region. 3. Whangarei Ecological District (N.Z.). I. Title. II. Series: New Zealand Protected Natural Areas Programme (Series) Foreword The Whangarei Ecological District comprises a range of landscapes with significant wildlife and vegetation values. Whangarei Harbour, a major shallow estuarine habitat with extensive mudflats, saltmarshes, shellbanks and mangroves, supports a rich diversity of international and resident coastal and wading birds which seasonally number in their thousands, despite the concentrations of housing, and the port, airport, cement and fertiliser works around it. Surrounding the outskirts of Whangarei City are numerous young scoria cones, clothed with nationally unique volcanic broadleaf forest, which are an important food source for the threatened kukupa (NZ pigeon). The once vast Hikurangi swamp on the Wairua River flood plain has been much diminished through drainage and development.
    [Show full text]
  • CRBF and Carter Holt Harvey
    PUBLIC Version ISSN No. 0114-2720 10103 Decision No. 589 Determination pursuant to the Commerce Act 1986 in the matter of an application for Proposal CRBF LIMITED and CARTER HOLT HARVEY LIMITED The Commission: Paula Rebstock Denese Bates QC Peter J M Taylor Summary of Application: CRBF Limited seeks clearance to acquire shares and assets owned by Carter Holt Harvey Limited, relating to forestry estates located in Northland, Auckland, central North Island and Nelson. Determination: Pursuant to section 66(3)(a) of the Commerce Act 1986, the Commission determines to give clearance to the proposed acquisition. Date of Determination: 05 October 2006 CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL IN THIS REPORT IS CONTAINED IN SQUARE BRACKETS CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................i GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................iv Terms ........................................................................................................................iv Parties.........................................................................................................................v THE PROPOSAL ..........................................................................................................1 PROCEDURE................................................................................................................1 STATUTORY FRAMEWORK.....................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Does Collaborative Governance Increase Public Confidence in Water Management? Survey Evidence from Aotearoa New Zealand
    www.water-alternatives.org Volume 13 | Issue 2 Tadaki, M.; Sinner, J.; Stahlmann-Brown, P. and Greenhalgh, S. 2020. Does collaborative governance increase public confidence in water management? Survey evidence from Aotearoa New Zealand. Water Alternatives 13(2): 302-323 Does Collaborative Governance Increase Public Confidence in Water Management? Survey Evidence from Aotearoa New Zealand Marc Tadaki Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand; [email protected] Jim Sinner Cawthron Institute, Nelson, New Zealand; [email protected] Philip Stahlmann-Brown Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research, Wellington, New Zealand; [email protected] Suzie Greenhalgh Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand; [email protected] ABSTRACT: Collaborative decision-making is widely understood as a democratic corrective to top-down forms of environmental management; it is a way in which citizens can contribute local knowledge to the policy process and have a more direct role in shaping policies and rules that affect them and their environments. However, while the democratic virtues of collaborative governance are often asserted, they are rarely evidenced; this leaves claims of democratic empowerment open to question. This study used a longitudinal survey of three New Zealand regions (n = 1350) to identify whether major multi-year investments in collaborative decision-making (2012-2018) are leading to increased public confidence in the effectiveness, responsiveness and fairness of water management institutions. Residents in collaborative catchments were found to have scores that were statistically indistinguishable from residents of non-collaborative catchments on management effectiveness, perceived agreement about water management, and fairness. Collaborative catchment residents did assign higher scores for water management responsiveness than did other residents, but the size of this difference was small compared to the effects of gender, ethnicity, region and level of individuals’ prior engagement in water management.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Interglacial Sea-Level Record of Aotearoa New Zealand (Aotearoa)
    The last interglacial sea-level record of Aotearoa New Zealand (Aotearoa) Deirdre D. Ryan1*, Alastair J.H. Clement2, Nathan R. Jankowski3,4, Paolo Stocchi5 1MARUM – Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany 5 2School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand 3 Centre for Archeological Science, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia 4Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia 10 5NIOZ, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Coastal Systems Department, and Utrecht University, PO Box 59 1790 AB Den Burg (Texel), The Netherlands Correspondence to: Deirdre D. Ryan ([email protected]) Abstract: This paper presents the current state-of-knowledge of the Aotearoa New Zealand (Aotearoa) last interglacial (MIS 5 sensu lato) sea-level record compiled within the framework of the World Atlas of Last Interglacial Shorelines (WALIS) 15 database. Seventy-seven total relative sea-level (RSL) indicators (direct, marine-, and terrestrial-limiting points), commonly in association with marine terraces, were identified from over 120 studies reviewed. Extensive coastal deformation around New Zealand has prompted research focused on active tectonics, which requires less precision than sea-level reconstruction. The range of last interglacial paleo-shoreline elevations are resulted in a significant range of elevation measurements on both the North Island (276.8 ± 10.0 to -94.2 ± 10.6 m amsl) and South Island (173.1165.8 ± 2.0 to -70.0 ± 10.3 m amsl) and 20 prompted the use of RSL indicators tohave been used to estimate rates of vertical land movement; however, indicators in many instances lackk adequate description and age constraint for high-quality RSL indicators.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper North Island Story 2019-2020
    UNISA The UPPER NORTH ISLAND STORY 2019 - 2020 UNI Growth Snapshot There were Hamilton house 17% price increase more cyclists in Auckland 38% from 2018 to 2019 from 2016 to 2019 Source: NZTA 2019 Source: QV 2019 From 1996 to 2019, Tauranga City had 81% growth Source: Tauranga District Council 3.1 million tonnes Tourism growth in the of cargo exported in 2019. Bay of Plenty was An increase of 13%, 63% the highest in the over 10 years Upper North Island Source: Northport 2019 Source: MBIE 2019 1 Upper North Island Story 2019 - 2020 UNISA CONTENTS 3 12 17 An introduction to the Our workforce Our economy Upper North Island story 7 13 18 The Upper North Island Our transport and Strategic importance is growing and changing infrastructure of working together 10 15 The Upper North Island Our natural is connected environment 11 16 Our homes Our response to a changing climate 2 Upper North Island Story 2019 - 2020 An introduction to the UPPER NORTH ISLAND STORY The Upper North Island Story is about growth, change and how important the connections between the regions and cities of the Upper North Island are to the success of New Zealand. This document is an update NORTHLAND to the first Upper North Island Story published in 2016. Since 2016, growth and change have continued and issues such as housing, infrastructure, natural environment and the changing climate have become even more POPULATION important. This document has been produced for the Upper North Island Strategic Alliance (UNISA) 166,000 179,076 UNISA was established in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Growth Programme
    The Regional Growth Programme Working in partnership with regional New Zealand to increase jobs, income and investment MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, Ministry for Primary Industries INNOVATION & EMPLOYMENT Mana! Ahu Matua HTKINA WHAKATUTUKI The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment and the Ministry for Primary Industries lead central government’s contribution to the Regional Growth Programme. They are also supported by other government agencies which draw upon their resources and expertise to drive support to the regions on key issues. A group of 11 ministers whose agencies have strong connections to regional economic development oversee the programme. This includes social and educational agencies, as well as infrastructure and economic agencies. MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION & EMPLOYMENT Ministry for Primary Industries HTKINA WHAKATUTUKI Manat Ahu Matua Regional Economic Development Ministers Hon Simon Bridges Minister for Economic Development Hon Nathan Guy Minister for Primary Industries Associate Minister for Economic Development Hon Te Ururoa Flavell Minister for Māori Development Associate Minister for Economic Development ISBN: 978-1-98-851779-7 print ISBN: 978-1-98-851780-3 online Publishing date: June 2017 Cover image sources: ZESPRI Flinn Higgins and Tourism Eastland Matt Burden NorthlandNZ.com NZStory Taylor Paige Paaka and Tourism Eastland MB14128_3014_JUN17 Contents Working in partnership with the regions 02 Tai Tokerau/ Hawke's Bay Northland 15 03 Waikato Taranaki 07 17 Bay of Plenty Manawatū- Whanganui 09 19 Gisborne/ West Coast Tairāwhiti 21 13 Canterbury 23 Southland 25 Annex: Regional Actions 28 Ballooning in Canterbury. Source: christchurchnz.com Working in partnership with the regions A new approach to regional economies How the programme works New Zealand’s economy is made up of diverse regions, each Each region initially identifes their key economic opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand's North Island 2
    452 ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd Art Deco Weekend 337 Bay of Plenty 41, 292-314, 273 Fringe NZ 22 accommodation 272 International Film Festival 359 climate 272 New Zealand International Arts highlights 273 Festival 22 travel seasons 272 NZ Body Painting Festival 252 Baylys Beach 151 Reel Earth Environmental Film beaches 18 Festival 237 Auckland region 58, 99, 101, 108 Splore 22 Bay of Islands 119 Taranaki International Arts Festival Bay of Plenty 306, 311, 312 24, 214 Baylys Beach 151 Te Matatini National Kapa Haka Festival 22 Coromandel Peninsula 13, 153, 165, 167-9, 170, 171-3 A Wanganui Festival of Glass 227 East Coast 319 accommodation 422-5, see also Wanganui Literary Festival 227 Great Barrier Island 93-7 individual locations World of WearableArt Award activities 21, 29-38, see also Show 24 Kapiti Coast 373-4, 376 individual activities, locations Atene 233 King Country 195 adventure & amusement parks ATMs 430 Lake Taupo 245 Northland 141, 142, 151 Rainbow’s End 59 Auckland 6, 39, 44-84, 45, 48, 52-3, Spookers 58 56, 60, 62, 66-7, 70, 7 safety 428-9 Waimarino Adventure Park 294 accommodation 66-72 south of Raglan 187-88 aerial sightseeing, see scenic flights activities 59-63 Taranaki 212, 218, 222 Ahipara 144-6 children, travel with 61 Te Henga (Bethells Beach) 100 air travel climate 44, 425 Waiheke Island 87, 86 airlines 436, 438 drinking 76-8 Waikato 178-9, 176-7 airports 436 entertainment 78-80 Wellington 357 to/from Auckland 82 festivals & events 64-6 Beehive 354 to/from New Zealand 436-8 food 44, 72-6 beer 385, see also
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resource Assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand
    Mineral resource assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand A B Christie R G Barker GNS SCIENCE \REPORT 2007/06 May 2007 Mineral resource assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand A B Christie R G Barker GNS Science Report 2007/06 May 2007 GNS Science BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE Christie, A.B., Barker, R.G. 2007. Mineral resource assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand, GNS Science Report, 2007/06, 179 A B Christie, GNS Science, PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt R G Barker, Consulting Geologist, PO Box 54-094, Bucklands Beach, Auckland © Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited, 2007 ISSN 1177-2425 ISBN 0-478-09969-X CONTENTS ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................................vii KEYWORDS ..........................................................................................................................................vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................1 2.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FACTORS AND LIMITATIONS .................................7 3.0 PREVIOUS WORK......................................................................................................................9 4.0 METHODS.................................................................................................................................11 5.0 DATA.........................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • The Far North…
    Far North Alcohol Team (FNAT) Co-location Project Evaluation Indicator Framework TheThe FarFar NorthNorth…… A great place to visit, live and work REPORT by Evaluation Solutions for the Alcohol Advisory Council of New Zealand ISBN 978-1-877373-82-4 Prepared for ALAC by Evaluation Solutions ALCOHOL ADVISORY COUNCIL OF NEW ZEALAND Kaunihera Whakatupato Waipiro o Aotearoa PO Box 5023 Wellington New Zealand www.alac.org.nz www.waipiro.org.nz September 2010 2 CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3 Far North Alcohol Team - Co-location Project Indicator Framework ....................................... 3 Purpose of co-location indicator framework report ......................................................................... 3 Methodology of indicator framework .............................................................................................. 3 Far North Alcohol Team – Collocation Project .......................................................................... 4 Project background ........................................................................................................................ 4 Project purpose and aims .............................................................................................................. 4 Indicators and data to support the project ...................................................................................... 5 What alcohol-related harm data exists in the Far
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting SAR Response and Operational Requirements
    NZ population projections through to 2030 For SARINZ By: Gordon Cessford & Bronek Kazmierow B Kazmierow – Recreation and Tourism Consulting Origins Sponsors: ◦ SARINZ ◦ NZ Oil and Gas Supporters - SARINZ stakeholders and broader network 2 Aim: Identify foreseeable patterns & trends in SAR incidents operational responses through to 2030 Primary objectives: Assess how SAR volunteer response will be affected by projected population changes Identify changes in the nature of SAR callouts over the next 20 years Identify how these will impact training needs 3 1. Approach ◦ Model 2. Demand: NZ population 3. Key demographic profiles & projections ◦ Aged & tourism 4. Supply ◦ Agency profile contrasts: Surf v. AREC Coastguard v. LandSAR 5. Incident type profiles 6. Trends 7. Summary ◦ Recommendations 4 Develop and apply a conceptual model Analyse relevant secondary data sources demographic projections incident records other information sources review of relevant literature Undertake projections 5 Demand factors Incident profiles – general and targetted Forecasts ○ tourism/recreation ○ other (including census population, age, ethnicity) Supply factors Volunteer profiles and projections Outcomes Equilibria or tension? Directions of change Implications for response 6 DEMAND FACTORS OVERALL SAR SUPPLY FACTORS OUTCOMES Overall NZ population demographic characteristics and projections SAR call-out demographic SAR volunteer demographic characteristics – national , profiles – national, regional and regional and targeted segments
    [Show full text]
  • NORTHLAND REGION FINDINGS from the 2013/14 ACTIVE NEW ZEALAND SURVEY Citation Sport New Zealand
    Sport & Active Recreation Regional Profile NORTHLAND REGION FINDINGS FROM THE 2013/14 ACTIVE NEW ZEALAND SURVEY Citation Sport New Zealand. (2015). Sport and Active Recreation Regional Profile: Northland Region – Findings from the 2013/14 Active New Zealand Survey. Wellington: Sport New Zealand. This document is available on the Sport New Zealand website: www.sportnz.org.nz. ISBN: 978-1-927232-71-2 WEB NORTHLAND Contents A QUICK LOOK ............................................................................................................2 At Adults .............................................................................................................. 2 At Participants ...................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................4 Methodology ........................................................................................................ 4 FINDINGS .....................................................................................................................6 Participation in Sport and Active Recreation over Different Timeframes ................. 6 Popular Sport and Recreation Activities ................................................................. 8 Number of Sport and Recreation Activities Participated In ................................... 10 Ways Participants Take Part in Sport and Active Recreation ..................................11 Where People
    [Show full text]